I would highly recommend isometrics but dont limit urself to just that include it in with ur weights,bands,machines,cardio, and bw exercise so u can be the strongest all around. I always do isometrics everyday.
This version of the isometric machine actually taken from the 1960,York Barbell isometric rack .best way doing 3 positions,botton ,middle,and almost lockout.not more than 8 secounds count,exerting all Your strenght against a static object.one can simply build a isometric rack out of wood,cost perhaps $200. it would be the same as this machine seen in this vedio.static contraction no more than 8 secounds,more than that would be wasting your time.
Where is the full range of motion? I get that it tests strength levels by pushing or pulling really hard, but that is not how to exercise. This is just a type of strength testing machine, not an exercise machine.
no range of motion = muscles not fully activated = not much ripping = not much happening. if the numbers on the machine actually work and correspond to something, it can be a strength measurer, but it's not a work out.
it's better than doing nothing, i guess. why are people always looking for the easy way out? are 3 one hour gym sessions per week that much to ask for?
Don't knock it until you have tried it. In 6 weeks, thats only 3 A workouts and 3 B workouts, my strength went though the roof. I was only benching around 80 kgs ( 3 x 10 reps) before I started. My bench jumped up to 140kg. This shit does work.
@Ducatista696 you do not know what isokinetcis are. Iso-metric means same (iso, as in isosceles triangle, a triangle with each side the same length) and metric is from metron meaning length. So, in an isometric exercise the contracted muscle remains the SAME LENGTH throughout the exercise. Iso-kinetics (from kinesis, movement, as in kinesiology or how our muscles function) means SAME SPEED. In an isokinetic exercise one MOVES but at the same speed throughout the contraction.
@Ducatista696 I don't understand. Yes, this is isometrics. They happen to be the most effective means of acquiring strength by increasing the efficiency of the neuromuscular system rather than by building muscle bulk. You can't duplicate this machine with a broom handle and some rope. It is that digital readout that keeps you always increasing your effort. Without it isometrics are very difficult to gauge vis a vis the amount of effort you are expending. I want this machine!.
@Ducatista696 isokinetics enjoyed a brief heyday until it was discovered that, since they lack a negative resistance portion to the exercise (such as lowering a barbell) their muscle building utility is very limited. I used to sell the TriMax home gym. The resistance was supplied by hydraulic cylinders. It was great for developing ones quick twitch fibers for punching, kicking, throwing, but the muscular development was mediocre. Isokinetics are entirely different from isometrics.
I hope that by doing this training I will be able to see some new muscle. I'm 6'2 205lbs at ~10% body fat I've been stuck at my current frame for a long time. I'm willing to try anything (except roids / crazy horse pills).
The most muscle Ive gained was with short Extreme High Intensity workouts that lasted ~30min. But I was still doing full ranges of motion and that lead to me hit a plateau b/c I did not give my body enough rest to fully recover.
I don't have the Static Hold Equipment but I'm giving this a shot. The older I get (I'm 27 now) the more I realize after training for 8 years that fallowing "Juicer" training techinques and trying their routines is BS. Any pro bodybuilder shoots up roids and intakes massive amounts of pills, which is why they are able to be in the gym for so long and do full range of motion workouts and still get results.
@asoflex Wow, you are an ignorant piece of shit! I am a competive BodyBuilder and you dont have the slightest clue about ANYTHING related to: Working Out, Bodybuilding, AAS, Kinisiology, Muscle Mechanics, Pussy, or ANYTHING else related! You FAIL at life kid
id have to say the tool is cool, i like how you can gauge your intensity to show progression, how ever i do beleive isometrics another tool to get in shape and not the only method...i use iso work to help with plateaus.... also i belive that the owner/inventer is horible at customer service...stating your way is the best way is b.s. it all depends on goals, specific needs of the individual, & of course intrest. i hope in the future some of the nay sayers will try some iso work 2 see its effects
I haven't found any bodybuilder who build great looking body with the use of Static Contraction. I am aware it can make your stronger but I am not convinced that it can help you build a great looking muscles like tradicional weight lifting will. Mabe you can share some insights on that.
I concur with everything Lazur1 has said. In conclusion, "xfguru" or whatever his name may be is a faggot & certainly hasn't got the right attitude towards criticism if he is expecting to succeed with any of his "work". He has no evidence proving his claims apart from his faggot disciples which undoubtedly are weaker than me(of which I've only been on SS for 8months). Only somebody afraid to get under the bar & Squat or pull a heavy DL would think of something as ridiculous as this.
the cardio isn't necessarily performed on the machine, there are reistance bands which allow you to do a great cardio workout utilizing the gym howevr in my studios clients perform MIT-Cardio, my own version of Tabata Protocol.....keeping an interval of 20 seconds exertion and 10 seonds rest equals one cycle and we perform up to 10 cylces for a carido workout
A similar rig could be built fairly cheaply. You can get a weighing scales/load cell for shipping which would go to high forces and have a max setting. All the scale/readout is doing is giving a figure to try and beat next time. If you stood on a scale and looped webbing under it and onto a bar and pulled upwards you would see the dial go up.
i don't disagree but there is so much more to this workout than just a rig i developed an entire training system (MIT) that i have used for over 4 years ages 6-84 with 100 SUCCESS. i guarantee results or it's free. more than 1400 clients later i have never once lost out on that there is intensity, overload, progression, timing, etc. we're opening centers in the US 2 are in oklahoma city, the ENTIRE workout cardio, strength, warm up cool down is 15 minutes not for the gym rats but :)
my daughter presses the car/trucks I leg press jets and airliners train cars only becasue so many o fleg press cars and planes in real day to day life mmmm kind of like gym rats regular day to day job is performing dozens of full range bench presses, bicep curls, butterflies, knee extenisons...wait a tick...what r thos ejobs other than the "true" hard core bodybuilders....perhaps liek u I'm sure, right
love me? uh, i think you should be posting to a "different" type of video.....Peace
You guys sound and look like the people who go to the gym day after day, doing the same sets reps and weight and don't gain a thing youll plateu and mantain at best!! I was you before max contraction I feel sorry for you!
Though the other guy camswitzer is a total fruit though!
yeah my point is to have a life and the so called "bodybuilders" who comment here spend more time in the gym in a week than I do in a YEAR!
the really funny part is I know several real bodybuilders and THEY don't have time to respond or at least choose not to make dumb ass comments on something they know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about....I'll put my system against any idiot here
Static contraction exercises and heavy, short range partial lifts work great and they do wonders for muscle mass. I personally don't care that some of you guys think it's not effective. I've used it for a long time and it's significantly more effective than full range lifts. The reason people who try SC fail is usually because they don't give their body enough rest. If you're doing heavy, SC lifts you need to hit the gym maybe once per week at the most.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Not a matter of effectiveness, but rather the emotional way its 'founder' answers serious criticism. Shawn has no interest in the Arthur Jones' elaborate hands-on research & has read little or none of the records of this work, yet feels fine w/ insulting it & claiming his work is "beyond" it. How can you claim to be beyond something that you know little or nothing about? I've great hope for the machine, but Shawn's attitude may kill viability beyond a few gyms run by Shawn & his students.
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
Max Planck 1858-1947. German Theoretical Physicist
hm.. the guy looks like shit i just dont get it.. MAYBE you'll get bit strength but what ever.. theres no way to build serious mass or even hard muscle with this crap as well as powerfilting skills.. even if you trust in this thing one way to say.. i'm training for 1 and a half year now beeing 18 years old an i've got way better musclequality and mass than this ridiciulous guy!
ur right, u dont get it u dont know anything about it, you never tried it, its way beyond ur level of comprehension, u know nothing about physiological response of motor units
I don't think you would build large amounts of mass with this. But, for someone like myself who has partially torn both knees & my right tricep tendon from regular powerlifting it could allow me to continue training. It could help with rehab & the elderly could get a quick workout and maintain strength.
i have no idea how much a can press full range because i train exclusively in partial (strong) range of motion because pressing weight doesn't buidl muscle, OVERLOADING muscles with weight does in real life are my clients stronger, please, you have no idea the majority of athletes i train dominate when strength, agility, and endurance are concerned some are a little short on technique
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm kinda sad: I was really hoping that Shawn was a weird genius who would really tear me a new one for all of my crticisms, and show me the light. The machine actually looks good, so much more solid than the 'other' guy's. Too bad.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The verdict: Shawn: Emotional, not intellectual. Answers criticism w/insults. Vague method, no research. Actually -against- research, 'reasoning' that research is somehow not as 'real' as his workouts. Guess what , Shawn? The research IS the workout!, resistance, effort, and results measured -precisely-. He doesn't even use his own meter to measure effort! Just some vague personal judgment of how hard the trainee seems to work.
this is not a workout,its a way of testing your short range of motion power which is rediculous and means nothing,working out with 1 rep will not give you definition and full range of motion does cause more full strength and size/better development,no bodybuilder in the world uses this machine its a simly way of seeing how much muscle fiber recrutiment you can achieve ,which does nothing but just that
youd be better of FROM if your going to bodybuilding
i tried to refrain but dude youre a frekkin idiot u obviously know nothing about building muscle urs is the dumbest response ive read btw the ONLY way to build new muscle is to OVERLOAD muscle fibers hence recruit more fiber build mroe muslce, dumb ass
learn how to spell muscle before you call someone else a dumbass,lol i know how to work out I have more mass then you ,and I dont use 1 rep max machines I do 12 reps im a bodybuilder not a power lifter I go for reps not max strength Max strength training is not bodybuilding so get out of here
peace dawg,no need to insult anyone here
godbless,lol i know how to build muscle i have some huge shoulders to prove it,peace
dude pleeez, i saw your vidz my daughter has more muscle development than you there very best thing about your vids however is the absolute clarification between morons like you who "think" you're a bodybuilder because you use bitch weights you're so NOT a body builder oh yeah, God Bless you too brother, moron
i got more mass then you will ever have you gruniting little monkey lol ps my vids are me without working out 1 single workout for 5 monthes and i took off my neckbrace to pose lol so u can only imagine me when im in the gym..but dont get too scared
p.s you said "my daughter has more muscle development than you there very best thing about your vids however is the absolute clarification between morons like you who "think" you're a bodybuilder because you use bitch weights you're so NOT a body builder oh yeah, God Bless you too brother, moron (alot of that made no sense at all my friend but if your trying to say im not a bodybuilder,I eat strict and I use very heavy weights you have never seen me lift,so dont gossip too much
precisely we are seeing how much muscle fiber recrutiment we can achieve anything lower is submaximal and weaker in other words anything lower is a waste of time and fuel
my point was that you wouldnt be able to bench press 600 pounds, you could probably lift it off the rack but go any lower and u wont be able to lift it, am i right?
Your point has merit but your asking the wrong question. You should ask- 'Is lifting the bar from a weaker position, with lower weight, going to increase my muscle mass more than higher weight from a stronger position?'... And the answer is, no.
Thats how i see it. I have no interest what so ever in increasing my Full ROM weights. I don't even lift Full ROM any more. ALL i want is muscle mass increase. And the SCT method, by far, makes the most sense in helping me reach my goals.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Does increased weight cause more growth than full effort in weak range? (Failing at the end of a full-ROM set + pushing for a few seconds/weak-range statics.) Advantages lie w/each choice: Fully contracted , mid, & stretch ranges, for full growth. Full-ROM w/proper cams & low friction bearings+ attention to rep speed, is the best single choice. Statics: Fine adjunct.
100% correct my point is a miss. univ. study concluded there is no benefit to using full ROM to build muscle/strength over any other range including short range partials so using ANY other range is less effective because it prevents btw i've increased the drives and improved the game of 100% of my golfer clients
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Arthur Jones: 1st, most thoro, most honest work on SC. (Well beyond any university.) (Sisco and Little steal the parts that support their ideas and leave out the parts that don't): His conclusions, (after many years and millions of dollars): FCP is the best static position for building strength and lean tissue, but as an exclusive protocol is inferior to full-range . 40 yrs ago Jones developed variable resistance: combining advantages of SC in FC with FR, & hasn't been improved on yet.
jones wasn't the first nor the last by a long shot to research and it has and IS in fact being improved upon its called measured intensity training sisoc and little remain in the past also nothing new at all form those guys
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Such as? York used isometrics as a cover-up for steroid use. I trust Jones above any university; he spent his own money, was beholding to no one, took as much time as was needed, was willing to change his mind when work proved assumptions wrong, & was extensive beyond anyone else. Much university work has been revealed by Ken Hutchens to be swept under the rug every time it goes the 'wrong' way, & re-designed until they get the results they want. Where can I study Measured Intensity?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Scientific results don't 'change'. When they seem to change, either the old research was flawed or the new research is flawed. I don't care if Jones did his work in 2000BC, his research is not flawed, thus his results remain true forever, while those who 'prove' any contradictions do so at great peril to their credibility.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Perhaps I wasn't clear: This study was 'loose' to the point of borderline fraud. There is a preponderance of evidence that full ROM is the single most effective mode for building muscle, and that statics have limited strength benefits outside of the trained range. Although this has been known for 40 yrs, much new evidence has accumulated from the disappointed users of modern static training devices.
If this were true, you wouldn't be making your, "I don't claim to train for bodybulding" disclaimer, and the top bodybuilders would be running to you for help. There is simply ZERO evidence in the form of actual physiques to prove your point. The art & science of building muscle is bodybuilding, like it or not. If you ain't doin' it, you ain't doin' it.
I read Sisco's S.C.T. book and his "Trainsmart" e-book a few years ago and tried 5-second SCs. I immediately had visible results (I'd thought I was genetically tricep-deficient) and broke through my Mon-Wed-Fri plateau. I adapted his workout using strong-range partial reps and SCs, increasing weight and decreasing frequency. Since 2005 I've only been in the gym twice a month on a split routine. I'm 5'10" 170 small frame; chest: 420lbs, legs:1000lbs. I maxed the machines so I'm increasing ROM.
congrats on the success i maxed ou tthe wts for a few exercises too this machine in my studio however goes to 5000lbs or resistance lb for lb so nobody will be maxing it out
Hah, static contractions [I use a handle bolted to a wall] with a large [at least 4-6 weeks for me] have been the only thing that actually noticeably added real size to my arms about 3/4" in 4 months. Not sure how that compares with others, [nor care really] because for me it was the only thing that made a difference. Its certainly the resting too.
i wouldnt use soley the 1 REP GYM to train a professional or Olympic athlete, duh however every single athlete can and will benefit from incorporating MIT performed on the 1 REP GYM, i've proven it...
EVERY DAY is kidney day so if you train every day or so youre constantly breaking down fibers and pyrutic and lactic acid never get COMPLETELY filtered out of kidneys therefore youll never optimize your strength training or mass size as far as athletics...
adapting the brainwashed method widely accpeted that is: gotta go to gym every other day to workout no matter what. well that bull crap. when one lifts significant weight your body MUST have time to recover sure there is the "i train different groups on different days" blah blah blah but the truth is...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"Straw man" argument. Nobody's saying that, Shawn. There's a huge mid ground between your claims & what you -say- are your "opponent's" claims. In that mid ground is the truth: Monitoring progress with no agenda other than results, there has not one been even one single great physique created from the exclusive use of your method. I'd think you'd be just a bit less arrogant about the 'brainwashed' folks who disagree with you until there was at least -one-.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And the old "guys on steroids can do it wrong and get results" argument is bogus: They don't WANT to do it 'wrong'. The biggest, best bodybuilders would absolutely RUN to a better way if it really were a better way. Why not make Jay Cutler, etc., an offer?, the way Arthur Jones made an offer to Sergio Oliva and many other top BBers of the day. (It sealed Jones' great reputation.) We'll listen to what -they- say about your training methods.
you can bench full rom 200lbs five times and thats nowhere near the intensity of one 400 bench press in any range that hits the pecs. pull a 200 lb weight across the floor 10 feet is the same as pulling 400 lbs five feet (physiological law) work X force now that we measure the isometric movement we know exactly what we are doing instead of...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's true only if you quit when you fail to move the bar out of weak range. If you keep pushing for a few seconds at this point, you get the same advantage that you're referring to, along with the full-range work that an eternity of athletes have proven to be worthwhile.
when you workout in the strongest or shortest range it allows for more weight or in this case force of resistance to placed on the muscle group ie pecs... i don't care about reps and sets i want the most intense rep for my pecs...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Intensity isn't external. You do much more -weight- in strong range than weak range, but your percentage of max -effort- may be still be lower. If you work in you weak range instead, you can get that full effort with a controlable wieght.
we go to the strongest and safest range (discovered not by me but by John Little) this machine allows the most intense workout for muscle group the goal of building indefinitie strenght and mass= the maximum number of muslce fibers recruited...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I mention Jones' research , and you respond that he wasn't the first, yet you credit Sisco and Little, who took ALL of their so-called "discoveries" from Jones. Why?
real simple, jones wasnt the 1st sisco litle are credited with innovating something new i.e. power index jones never had that pete did i never claimed that sisco/little were the founders of isos besides i'm so far past anything jones, sisco, or little are doing get in the "now" the ONLY person who created what i do is "ME" now I'm creating,researching, developing latest and greatest, not decades old
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Jones has -thousands- of pages published, available to anyone. Much of it is on static contraction in strong range; results on -hundreds- of trainee's over -many- years, ie; the -real- 'power index", not some set of bs numbers. Why am I getting the feeling that you haven't read much of Jones's work? You might change your mind after you do.
time your next workout if youre not recovered its almost a complete waste of time this workout is based upon intenisty and progressive over load there is not a study in the world which proves you need a full range of motion rep to build muscle...
No, but it's pretty basic knowledge that you only build strength in the ROM worked. Outside of sport specific applications, a weightlifter training to gain strength in the ROM of the sticking point in a particular lift, for example, this doesn't appear to be a very functional exercise modality. As a modality it is a violation of the SAID and Specificity principles, and you claim of 100% results is not reasonable due to the principle of Individual Differences.
if u were correct which you aren't, contortionists and yoga instructors would be the most muscular people on the planet. go find ONE single study CLAIMING full ROM is needed/required for strength mass building duh because of INDIVIDUALS it's 100% it's all relative to the frekkin PERSON
build lean mass and it will burn fat i agree soem cardio does but much doesnt if it did almost nobody would be overweight it is isometric strength training with MEASUREMENT of intensity which allows how to precisely...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Muscle burning fat isn't practical , considering all the fat power lifters & off-season bodybuilders. Would they be less fat if they only had -more- muscle? I don't think so. Would thay be even fatter if they were less muscular? I also don't think so, (they're awfully fat already). W/O diet & much ultra low intensity activity, those who tend to be fat -will- be fat.
Dorian Yates, leanest Mr. Olympia ever, did 2 types of training: Brief heavy lifting & much walking.
ROM is pretty limited. Full ROM can help improve flexibility. I'm not sure how this could help burn fat because I don't see a cardio aspect in this training. If anything it looks like the guy is doing limited range isometric movement. It can tome a person muscles but not really a sports specific training appratus.
first of ludicrous is a rapper, (one of my favorties) secondly the guy in the video can bench 2,132 lbs wiht free weights. nearly 5,000 lbs on squat dumbest comment ever, wow 600lb bone bench press i learned somethin new, bones can lift weight
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
People like me? You mean people who really want to know more aboout effective exercise? Who want more than an emotional outburst for an answer to a fair question? You've had enough of those kinds of people? Where are all these debates you've apparently won? You really shouldn't claim to have surpassed methods that you don't even know about, but of course, that's -why- you -can-. Ignorance is bliss.
I wold be interested in knowing what the individual in the video can actually bench press with actual weight for a full ROM rep. The same for squats. I am not interested in what your bones can handle at a near full lockout position. Moreover, I would be interested in knowing just how much free weight, full ROM strength he had prior to this contraption and then after using it. 3K US dollars is ludicrous.
A little less than 3K US. I will have a new video of the new machine in a week or two. the machine accommodates up to 5,000 lbs of resistance. please check back.
I developed the training and the machine accommodatees up to 5,000 lbs of resistance.
I've successfully trained over 600 people with 100% success in getting more fit. NOT bodybuilding competition ready. Simply adding muscle, burning fat, reshaping.
I would love to own one of these but cannot afford the price tag of nearly four grand.
TheCausticGnostic 2 months ago
I would highly recommend isometrics but dont limit urself to just that include it in with ur weights,bands,machines,cardio, and bw exercise so u can be the strongest all around. I always do isometrics everyday.
jkerns85 7 months ago
This version of the isometric machine actually taken from the 1960,York Barbell isometric rack .best way doing 3 positions,botton ,middle,and almost lockout.not more than 8 secounds count,exerting all Your strenght against a static object.one can simply build a isometric rack out of wood,cost perhaps $200. it would be the same as this machine seen in this vedio.static contraction no more than 8 secounds,more than that would be wasting your time.
Robert317able 10 months ago
He benches more than he squats. Sad...
Suckmykiss20 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sooooooooo.. that's all you do?
dbmrhi 1 year ago
This guy is going to pop a ball.
MrReidLynn 1 year ago
hahaha not even aktive movement of the joints this will bring you nowhere!
LosChrisos 1 year ago
Where is the full range of motion? I get that it tests strength levels by pushing or pulling really hard, but that is not how to exercise. This is just a type of strength testing machine, not an exercise machine.
ParaPhilosopher 1 year ago
whats 1 rep and 16 reps?
clikclikboom123 1 year ago
look how cumbersome and ugly this machine is. not to mention that it has basically no utility in strength training. money well spent, lol
klaran 1 year ago
this is retarded.
noonan94 1 year ago
wtf is this? people always have to look for a shortcut. classification-lazy people.
makohit 1 year ago
@makohit .
makohit 1 year ago
@makohit
Actually it is scientifically proven to be more effective at training maximum strength than any other method. So stfu.
cougarbart 1 year ago
@cougarbart show me the "science" reports.
makohit 1 year ago
Wtf is this shit?
RudeViewer 1 year ago
no range of motion = muscles not fully activated = not much ripping = not much happening. if the numbers on the machine actually work and correspond to something, it can be a strength measurer, but it's not a work out.
it's better than doing nothing, i guess. why are people always looking for the easy way out? are 3 one hour gym sessions per week that much to ask for?
wooshoo 2 years ago 5
ya, its cool, but not exactly a great strength builder
BarakTheLiar1 2 years ago
Ducatista696 - An interesting point. It looks like an isometric contraction against an almost imovable object. An effective strength builder.
bgibb101 2 years ago
Shittest machine ever.
mickill2 2 years ago
Don't knock it until you have tried it. In 6 weeks, thats only 3 A workouts and 3 B workouts, my strength went though the roof. I was only benching around 80 kgs ( 3 x 10 reps) before I started. My bench jumped up to 140kg. This shit does work.
04awesome 2 years ago
wtf is this shyt
fester101 2 years ago
Wow. This is ridiculous. You could do the same thing against a fucking wall. Wow.
yoyonukkah 2 years ago
Incredible machine. Where can I get one?
j354j4 2 years ago
This workout is lacking some important things:
1) No pre-stretch progressing to the fully contracted position - making for a much stronger contraction
2) Because a maximum single rep is done there is potential for injury
3) No work on negative resistance which has been proven for decades to be the most productive form of strength training
4) Very little cardio work
With so many better choices of exercise equipment out there and for less money I don't know why anyone would choose this machine.
TagerFu 2 years ago 11
This is just a version of isokenetics.
Ducatista696 2 years ago 6
@Ducatista696 you do not know what isokinetcis are. Iso-metric means same (iso, as in isosceles triangle, a triangle with each side the same length) and metric is from metron meaning length. So, in an isometric exercise the contracted muscle remains the SAME LENGTH throughout the exercise. Iso-kinetics (from kinesis, movement, as in kinesiology or how our muscles function) means SAME SPEED. In an isokinetic exercise one MOVES but at the same speed throughout the contraction.
TheCausticGnostic 2 months ago
@TheCausticGnostic my mistake. OK this is just another version of isometrics. I can do this with broom handle and two pieces of rope.
Ducatista696 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheCausticGnostic 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ducatista696 I don't understand. Yes, this is isometrics. They happen to be the most effective means of acquiring strength by increasing the efficiency of the neuromuscular system rather than by building muscle bulk. You can't duplicate this machine with a broom handle and some rope. It is that digital readout that keeps you always increasing your effort. Without it isometrics are very difficult to gauge vis a vis the amount of effort you are expending. I want this machine!.
TheCausticGnostic 2 months ago
@Ducatista696 isokinetics enjoyed a brief heyday until it was discovered that, since they lack a negative resistance portion to the exercise (such as lowering a barbell) their muscle building utility is very limited. I used to sell the TriMax home gym. The resistance was supplied by hydraulic cylinders. It was great for developing ones quick twitch fibers for punching, kicking, throwing, but the muscular development was mediocre. Isokinetics are entirely different from isometrics.
TheCausticGnostic 2 months ago
where do I get this machine? how much does it cost?
shadowcii 3 years ago
This is ridiculously dumb.
dudesome6969 3 years ago 3
@dudesome6969
Why? Because you're used to the typical bullshit that doesn't work?
cougarbart 1 year ago
I hope that by doing this training I will be able to see some new muscle. I'm 6'2 205lbs at ~10% body fat I've been stuck at my current frame for a long time. I'm willing to try anything (except roids / crazy horse pills).
asoflex 3 years ago
The most muscle Ive gained was with short Extreme High Intensity workouts that lasted ~30min. But I was still doing full ranges of motion and that lead to me hit a plateau b/c I did not give my body enough rest to fully recover.
asoflex 3 years ago
I don't have the Static Hold Equipment but I'm giving this a shot. The older I get (I'm 27 now) the more I realize after training for 8 years that fallowing "Juicer" training techinques and trying their routines is BS. Any pro bodybuilder shoots up roids and intakes massive amounts of pills, which is why they are able to be in the gym for so long and do full range of motion workouts and still get results.
asoflex 3 years ago
@asoflex Wow, you are an ignorant piece of shit! I am a competive BodyBuilder and you dont have the slightest clue about ANYTHING related to: Working Out, Bodybuilding, AAS, Kinisiology, Muscle Mechanics, Pussy, or ANYTHING else related! You FAIL at life kid
IceTTom 1 year ago
but understand it may not be the staple of your work out but may be a great suppliment to your work out
also i hope the inventer learns how to handle customers better...much luck to everyone
madmikeleon 3 years ago
id have to say the tool is cool, i like how you can gauge your intensity to show progression, how ever i do beleive isometrics another tool to get in shape and not the only method...i use iso work to help with plateaus.... also i belive that the owner/inventer is horible at customer service...stating your way is the best way is b.s. it all depends on goals, specific needs of the individual, & of course intrest. i hope in the future some of the nay sayers will try some iso work 2 see its effects
madmikeleon 3 years ago
I haven't found any bodybuilder who build great looking body with the use of Static Contraction. I am aware it can make your stronger but I am not convinced that it can help you build a great looking muscles like tradicional weight lifting will. Mabe you can share some insights on that.
kapitanciacho 3 years ago
I used static contraction to get big for my build. But I am not a "body builder" just an enthusiast who likes to cruise the beach.
It helped me grow, but I had to balance it out with yoga to strengthen my spinal erectus muscles because my back kept going out.
shadowcii 3 years ago
how much were u leg pressing? i couldnt tell what the number said?, on my last workout i got 1071
topannapot 3 years ago
my legs were 1301 on my most recent workout
topannapot 3 years ago
you know, im not criticizing you or anything, but can you please post a video of you doing a full 1RM bench press with the Bar?
ChineseDonuts 3 years ago
I concur with everything Lazur1 has said. In conclusion, "xfguru" or whatever his name may be is a faggot & certainly hasn't got the right attitude towards criticism if he is expecting to succeed with any of his "work". He has no evidence proving his claims apart from his faggot disciples which undoubtedly are weaker than me(of which I've only been on SS for 8months). Only somebody afraid to get under the bar & Squat or pull a heavy DL would think of something as ridiculous as this.
AidenBloodaxe 3 years ago
the cardio isn't necessarily performed on the machine, there are reistance bands which allow you to do a great cardio workout utilizing the gym howevr in my studios clients perform MIT-Cardio, my own version of Tabata Protocol.....keeping an interval of 20 seconds exertion and 10 seonds rest equals one cycle and we perform up to 10 cylces for a carido workout
xfguru 3 years ago
A similar rig could be built fairly cheaply. You can get a weighing scales/load cell for shipping which would go to high forces and have a max setting. All the scale/readout is doing is giving a figure to try and beat next time. If you stood on a scale and looped webbing under it and onto a bar and pulled upwards you would see the dial go up.
viciousblackout 3 years ago
i don't disagree but there is so much more to this workout than just a rig i developed an entire training system (MIT) that i have used for over 4 years ages 6-84 with 100 SUCCESS. i guarantee results or it's free. more than 1400 clients later i have never once lost out on that there is intensity, overload, progression, timing, etc. we're opening centers in the US 2 are in oklahoma city, the ENTIRE workout cardio, strength, warm up cool down is 15 minutes not for the gym rats but :)
xfguru 3 years ago
How do u do a cardio workout on this type of equipment????????????????
raj2007ca 3 years ago
@viciousblackout could you elaborate? If so, please PM me. Thanks!
TheCausticGnostic 2 months ago
my daughter presses the car/trucks I leg press jets and airliners train cars only becasue so many o fleg press cars and planes in real day to day life mmmm kind of like gym rats regular day to day job is performing dozens of full range bench presses, bicep curls, butterflies, knee extenisons...wait a tick...what r thos ejobs other than the "true" hard core bodybuilders....perhaps liek u I'm sure, right
love me? uh, i think you should be posting to a "different" type of video.....Peace
xfguru 3 years ago
@xfguru
do you even fucking speak english?
steveteaches 1 year ago
ROFLMAO OMG THAT WORKOUT ROCKED
This is a prime example of hit and quit it gone to far, or HIT gone retarded.
Forget everything you know people, its been lies all along - you can gain 100lbs of muscle in a year doing this!
operations1000 3 years ago
just when i thought all the dumb asses had weighed in....
xfguru 3 years ago
;)
Not offending what your doing, keep it up bro. Can you leg press a car yet? I love you man!
operations1000 3 years ago
@xfguru yea, you commented again
steveteaches 1 year ago
You guys sound and look like the people who go to the gym day after day, doing the same sets reps and weight and don't gain a thing youll plateu and mantain at best!! I was you before max contraction I feel sorry for you!
Though the other guy camswitzer is a total fruit though!
djpuplex 3 years ago
yeah my point is to have a life and the so called "bodybuilders" who comment here spend more time in the gym in a week than I do in a YEAR!
the really funny part is I know several real bodybuilders and THEY don't have time to respond or at least choose not to make dumb ass comments on something they know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about....I'll put my system against any idiot here
xfguru 3 years ago
so it's completely isometric? i can't even imagine how this would build muscle at all.
also, your grip sucks ass.
quadrophrenic 3 years ago
your grip sucks ass....well that pretty well defines what you don't know about muscle building
regarding isometrics, dude pull your head and get into this century ready up on iso's regarding iso's & strength/mass building
dumbest reply i've read yet
my God where do you idiots come from...
xfguru 3 years ago
Why is there no video of him doing a:
Full Bench Press,
Full Less Press,
at those weights.
I mean come on, if this machine works and allows them to build such strenght - post them doing it on another machine as "proof".
I'm callin' you out boy. :-) I think this is bullshit.
MaximumCheeseage 3 years ago
Static contraction exercises and heavy, short range partial lifts work great and they do wonders for muscle mass. I personally don't care that some of you guys think it's not effective. I've used it for a long time and it's significantly more effective than full range lifts. The reason people who try SC fail is usually because they don't give their body enough rest. If you're doing heavy, SC lifts you need to hit the gym maybe once per week at the most.
mervin338 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not a matter of effectiveness, but rather the emotional way its 'founder' answers serious criticism. Shawn has no interest in the Arthur Jones' elaborate hands-on research & has read little or none of the records of this work, yet feels fine w/ insulting it & claiming his work is "beyond" it. How can you claim to be beyond something that you know little or nothing about? I've great hope for the machine, but Shawn's attitude may kill viability beyond a few gyms run by Shawn & his students.
lazurlazur 3 years ago
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
Max Planck 1858-1947. German Theoretical Physicist
xfguru 3 years ago
How much do one of these contraptions cost?
iluvmyswissball 3 years ago
3 k
lifetime warranty
over 4,000 lbs of resistance you'll never outgrow it
i have 16 year olds outgrown free weights for leg and toe press using these techniques
xfguru 3 years ago
You just said pressing doesn't build muscle...oh gee when can I try this thing out
daytonadudenheimer 3 years ago
total crap
koerperkult 4 years ago
i have to assume you refer to the contents of your brain
xfguru 4 years ago
hm.. the guy looks like shit i just dont get it.. MAYBE you'll get bit strength but what ever.. theres no way to build serious mass or even hard muscle with this crap as well as powerfilting skills.. even if you trust in this thing one way to say.. i'm training for 1 and a half year now beeing 18 years old an i've got way better musclequality and mass than this ridiciulous guy!
koerperkult 3 years ago
ur right, u dont get it u dont know anything about it, you never tried it, its way beyond ur level of comprehension, u know nothing about physiological response of motor units
so by all means, state ur opinion
frekkin idiot
xfguru 3 years ago
I don't think you would build large amounts of mass with this. But, for someone like myself who has partially torn both knees & my right tricep tendon from regular powerlifting it could allow me to continue training. It could help with rehab & the elderly could get a quick workout and maintain strength.
johnnyu3 4 years ago
ok a 324 lb military press. Now put 324 lbs on a bar and let's see you press it. Does this machine actually make you stronger in real life?
goshendad 4 years ago
i have no idea how much a can press full range because i train exclusively in partial (strong) range of motion because pressing weight doesn't buidl muscle, OVERLOADING muscles with weight does in real life are my clients stronger, please, you have no idea the majority of athletes i train dominate when strength, agility, and endurance are concerned some are a little short on technique
xfguru 4 years ago
actually, no it makes you weaker and removes all your muscles,your lungs,and brain but i thought hey, why not give it a shot are you serious....
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm kinda sad: I was really hoping that Shawn was a weird genius who would really tear me a new one for all of my crticisms, and show me the light. The machine actually looks good, so much more solid than the 'other' guy's. Too bad.
lazur1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The verdict: Shawn: Emotional, not intellectual. Answers criticism w/insults. Vague method, no research. Actually -against- research, 'reasoning' that research is somehow not as 'real' as his workouts. Guess what , Shawn? The research IS the workout!, resistance, effort, and results measured -precisely-. He doesn't even use his own meter to measure effort! Just some vague personal judgment of how hard the trainee seems to work.
lazur1 4 years ago
this is not a workout,its a way of testing your short range of motion power which is rediculous and means nothing,working out with 1 rep will not give you definition and full range of motion does cause more full strength and size/better development,no bodybuilder in the world uses this machine its a simly way of seeing how much muscle fiber recrutiment you can achieve ,which does nothing but just that
youd be better of FROM if your going to bodybuilding
godbless everyone
SeanSevenYears 4 years ago
i tried to refrain but dude youre a frekkin idiot u obviously know nothing about building muscle urs is the dumbest response ive read btw the ONLY way to build new muscle is to OVERLOAD muscle fibers hence recruit more fiber build mroe muslce, dumb ass
xfguru 4 years ago
learn how to spell muscle before you call someone else a dumbass,lol i know how to work out I have more mass then you ,and I dont use 1 rep max machines I do 12 reps im a bodybuilder not a power lifter I go for reps not max strength Max strength training is not bodybuilding so get out of here
peace dawg,no need to insult anyone here
godbless,lol i know how to build muscle i have some huge shoulders to prove it,peace
SeanSevenYears 4 years ago
you have no mass at all and you look rediculous puffing and huffing with your 1 rep 1 cm reps
SeanSevenYears 4 years ago
dude pleeez, i saw your vidz my daughter has more muscle development than you there very best thing about your vids however is the absolute clarification between morons like you who "think" you're a bodybuilder because you use bitch weights you're so NOT a body builder oh yeah, God Bless you too brother, moron
xfguru 4 years ago
i got more mass then you will ever have you gruniting little monkey lol ps my vids are me without working out 1 single workout for 5 monthes and i took off my neckbrace to pose lol so u can only imagine me when im in the gym..but dont get too scared
lol
peace
SeanSevenYears 4 years ago
p.s you said "my daughter has more muscle development than you there very best thing about your vids however is the absolute clarification between morons like you who "think" you're a bodybuilder because you use bitch weights you're so NOT a body builder oh yeah, God Bless you too brother, moron (alot of that made no sense at all my friend but if your trying to say im not a bodybuilder,I eat strict and I use very heavy weights you have never seen me lift,so dont gossip too much
godbless
SeanSevenYears 4 years ago
this is no workout......
pethetic
SeanSevenYears 4 years ago
when u see how much force u press on the bench press, ur just seeing how much u push at the top of ur bench not the bottom, so u should lower the bar
mizunogolfer123 4 years ago
precisely we are seeing how much muscle fiber recrutiment we can achieve anything lower is submaximal and weaker in other words anything lower is a waste of time and fuel
xfguru 4 years ago
my point was that you wouldnt be able to bench press 600 pounds, you could probably lift it off the rack but go any lower and u wont be able to lift it, am i right?
mizunogolfer123 4 years ago
Your point has merit but your asking the wrong question. You should ask- 'Is lifting the bar from a weaker position, with lower weight, going to increase my muscle mass more than higher weight from a stronger position?'... And the answer is, no.
Thats how i see it. I have no interest what so ever in increasing my Full ROM weights. I don't even lift Full ROM any more. ALL i want is muscle mass increase. And the SCT method, by far, makes the most sense in helping me reach my goals.
TomLandrysHat 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Does increased weight cause more growth than full effort in weak range? (Failing at the end of a full-ROM set + pushing for a few seconds/weak-range statics.) Advantages lie w/each choice: Fully contracted , mid, & stretch ranges, for full growth. Full-ROM w/proper cams & low friction bearings+ attention to rep speed, is the best single choice. Statics: Fine adjunct.
lazur1 4 years ago
100% correct my point is a miss. univ. study concluded there is no benefit to using full ROM to build muscle/strength over any other range including short range partials so using ANY other range is less effective because it prevents btw i've increased the drives and improved the game of 100% of my golfer clients
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Arthur Jones: 1st, most thoro, most honest work on SC. (Well beyond any university.) (Sisco and Little steal the parts that support their ideas and leave out the parts that don't): His conclusions, (after many years and millions of dollars): FCP is the best static position for building strength and lean tissue, but as an exclusive protocol is inferior to full-range . 40 yrs ago Jones developed variable resistance: combining advantages of SC in FC with FR, & hasn't been improved on yet.
lazur1 4 years ago
jones wasn't the first nor the last by a long shot to research and it has and IS in fact being improved upon its called measured intensity training sisoc and little remain in the past also nothing new at all form those guys
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Such as? York used isometrics as a cover-up for steroid use. I trust Jones above any university; he spent his own money, was beholding to no one, took as much time as was needed, was willing to change his mind when work proved assumptions wrong, & was extensive beyond anyone else. Much university work has been revealed by Ken Hutchens to be swept under the rug every time it goes the 'wrong' way, & re-designed until they get the results they want. Where can I study Measured Intensity?
lazur1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Scientific results don't 'change'. When they seem to change, either the old research was flawed or the new research is flawed. I don't care if Jones did his work in 2000BC, his research is not flawed, thus his results remain true forever, while those who 'prove' any contradictions do so at great peril to their credibility.
lazur1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Perhaps I wasn't clear: This study was 'loose' to the point of borderline fraud. There is a preponderance of evidence that full ROM is the single most effective mode for building muscle, and that statics have limited strength benefits outside of the trained range. Although this has been known for 40 yrs, much new evidence has accumulated from the disappointed users of modern static training devices.
lazur1 4 years ago
If this were true, you wouldn't be making your, "I don't claim to train for bodybulding" disclaimer, and the top bodybuilders would be running to you for help. There is simply ZERO evidence in the form of actual physiques to prove your point. The art & science of building muscle is bodybuilding, like it or not. If you ain't doin' it, you ain't doin' it.
lazur1 4 years ago
i have a few questins, what is that machine? how much is it? and where abouts can you get it from. it looks like a great investment.
nizoabc 4 years ago
its the 1 REP GYM
under $3k
lifetime
5k lbs of resistance (weight)
full body workout this video is only 5 of the 10 major exercises
comes with my MIT dvd and workout booklet
workout scheduling
workout charts
email me at shawn @ aafbiz com to order
unpack and workout within 10 minutes
xfguru 4 years ago
I read Sisco's S.C.T. book and his "Trainsmart" e-book a few years ago and tried 5-second SCs. I immediately had visible results (I'd thought I was genetically tricep-deficient) and broke through my Mon-Wed-Fri plateau. I adapted his workout using strong-range partial reps and SCs, increasing weight and decreasing frequency. Since 2005 I've only been in the gym twice a month on a split routine. I'm 5'10" 170 small frame; chest: 420lbs, legs:1000lbs. I maxed the machines so I'm increasing ROM.
ciretose2 4 years ago
congrats on the success i maxed ou tthe wts for a few exercises too this machine in my studio however goes to 5000lbs or resistance lb for lb so nobody will be maxing it out
xfguru 4 years ago
Hah, static contractions [I use a handle bolted to a wall] with a large [at least 4-6 weeks for me] have been the only thing that actually noticeably added real size to my arms about 3/4" in 4 months. Not sure how that compares with others, [nor care really] because for me it was the only thing that made a difference. Its certainly the resting too.
defwatcher 4 years ago
i wouldnt use soley the 1 REP GYM to train a professional or Olympic athlete, duh however every single athlete can and will benefit from incorporating MIT performed on the 1 REP GYM, i've proven it...
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You've -claimed- to have proven it. To paraphrase you; "I don't have to prove anything".
lazur1 4 years ago
EVERY DAY is kidney day so if you train every day or so youre constantly breaking down fibers and pyrutic and lactic acid never get COMPLETELY filtered out of kidneys therefore youll never optimize your strength training or mass size as far as athletics...
xfguru 4 years ago
adapting the brainwashed method widely accpeted that is: gotta go to gym every other day to workout no matter what. well that bull crap. when one lifts significant weight your body MUST have time to recover sure there is the "i train different groups on different days" blah blah blah but the truth is...
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Straw man" argument. Nobody's saying that, Shawn. There's a huge mid ground between your claims & what you -say- are your "opponent's" claims. In that mid ground is the truth: Monitoring progress with no agenda other than results, there has not one been even one single great physique created from the exclusive use of your method. I'd think you'd be just a bit less arrogant about the 'brainwashed' folks who disagree with you until there was at least -one-.
lazur1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And the old "guys on steroids can do it wrong and get results" argument is bogus: They don't WANT to do it 'wrong'. The biggest, best bodybuilders would absolutely RUN to a better way if it really were a better way. Why not make Jay Cutler, etc., an offer?, the way Arthur Jones made an offer to Sergio Oliva and many other top BBers of the day. (It sealed Jones' great reputation.) We'll listen to what -they- say about your training methods.
lazur1 4 years ago
you can bench full rom 200lbs five times and thats nowhere near the intensity of one 400 bench press in any range that hits the pecs. pull a 200 lb weight across the floor 10 feet is the same as pulling 400 lbs five feet (physiological law) work X force now that we measure the isometric movement we know exactly what we are doing instead of...
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's true only if you quit when you fail to move the bar out of weak range. If you keep pushing for a few seconds at this point, you get the same advantage that you're referring to, along with the full-range work that an eternity of athletes have proven to be worthwhile.
lazur1 4 years ago
when you workout in the strongest or shortest range it allows for more weight or in this case force of resistance to placed on the muscle group ie pecs... i don't care about reps and sets i want the most intense rep for my pecs...
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Intensity isn't external. You do much more -weight- in strong range than weak range, but your percentage of max -effort- may be still be lower. If you work in you weak range instead, you can get that full effort with a controlable wieght.
lazur1 4 years ago
we go to the strongest and safest range (discovered not by me but by John Little) this machine allows the most intense workout for muscle group the goal of building indefinitie strenght and mass= the maximum number of muslce fibers recruited...
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I mention Jones' research , and you respond that he wasn't the first, yet you credit Sisco and Little, who took ALL of their so-called "discoveries" from Jones. Why?
lazur1 4 years ago
real simple, jones wasnt the 1st sisco litle are credited with innovating something new i.e. power index jones never had that pete did i never claimed that sisco/little were the founders of isos besides i'm so far past anything jones, sisco, or little are doing get in the "now" the ONLY person who created what i do is "ME" now I'm creating,researching, developing latest and greatest, not decades old
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jones has -thousands- of pages published, available to anyone. Much of it is on static contraction in strong range; results on -hundreds- of trainee's over -many- years, ie; the -real- 'power index", not some set of bs numbers. Why am I getting the feeling that you haven't read much of Jones's work? You might change your mind after you do.
lazur1 4 years ago
time your next workout if youre not recovered its almost a complete waste of time this workout is based upon intenisty and progressive over load there is not a study in the world which proves you need a full range of motion rep to build muscle...
xfguru 4 years ago
No, but it's pretty basic knowledge that you only build strength in the ROM worked. Outside of sport specific applications, a weightlifter training to gain strength in the ROM of the sticking point in a particular lift, for example, this doesn't appear to be a very functional exercise modality. As a modality it is a violation of the SAID and Specificity principles, and you claim of 100% results is not reasonable due to the principle of Individual Differences.
Roshibear 3 years ago
if u were correct which you aren't, contortionists and yoga instructors would be the most muscular people on the planet. go find ONE single study CLAIMING full ROM is needed/required for strength mass building duh because of INDIVIDUALS it's 100% it's all relative to the frekkin PERSON
xfguru 3 years ago
build lean mass and it will burn fat i agree soem cardio does but much doesnt if it did almost nobody would be overweight it is isometric strength training with MEASUREMENT of intensity which allows how to precisely...
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Muscle burning fat isn't practical , considering all the fat power lifters & off-season bodybuilders. Would they be less fat if they only had -more- muscle? I don't think so. Would thay be even fatter if they were less muscular? I also don't think so, (they're awfully fat already). W/O diet & much ultra low intensity activity, those who tend to be fat -will- be fat.
Dorian Yates, leanest Mr. Olympia ever, did 2 types of training: Brief heavy lifting & much walking.
lazur1 4 years ago
ROM is pretty limited. Full ROM can help improve flexibility. I'm not sure how this could help burn fat because I don't see a cardio aspect in this training. If anything it looks like the guy is doing limited range isometric movement. It can tome a person muscles but not really a sports specific training appratus.
kwak76 4 years ago
first of ludicrous is a rapper, (one of my favorties) secondly the guy in the video can bench 2,132 lbs wiht free weights. nearly 5,000 lbs on squat dumbest comment ever, wow 600lb bone bench press i learned somethin new, bones can lift weight
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're thinking of -Ludicris-.
lazur1 4 years ago
ur really up to speed here,
i couldn't care less how u or anyone else trains
i don't give a damn about research i do give a damn about what works
this works for me and 100% of the people i train i don't have to prove anything to you
i'm so far past debating people like u its not even funny
if what ur doing works, more pwr 2 u brutha
this is wasting my time.......yawn
xfguru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
People like me? You mean people who really want to know more aboout effective exercise? Who want more than an emotional outburst for an answer to a fair question? You've had enough of those kinds of people? Where are all these debates you've apparently won? You really shouldn't claim to have surpassed methods that you don't even know about, but of course, that's -why- you -can-. Ignorance is bliss.
lazur1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Of course it works, it's exercise, but BETTER? You don't know enough about any other methods to even start judging such a thing.
lazur1 4 years ago
I wold be interested in knowing what the individual in the video can actually bench press with actual weight for a full ROM rep. The same for squats. I am not interested in what your bones can handle at a near full lockout position. Moreover, I would be interested in knowing just how much free weight, full ROM strength he had prior to this contraption and then after using it. 3K US dollars is ludicrous.
bluer32 4 years ago
how much does this cost?
SCPOSC 4 years ago
A little less than 3K US. I will have a new video of the new machine in a week or two. the machine accommodates up to 5,000 lbs of resistance. please check back.
xfguru 4 years ago
what is this thing? resistance meter thats crazy
ThaHeartOfLife 4 years ago
I developed the training and the machine accommodatees up to 5,000 lbs of resistance.
I've successfully trained over 600 people with 100% success in getting more fit. NOT bodybuilding competition ready. Simply adding muscle, burning fat, reshaping.
xfguru 4 years ago
hey im a pt, where can i get this machine?
jayjaygeebee 4 years ago
go to aafbizcom and contact me through emial or phone
xfguru 4 years ago