Fox And Friends Are Bitchy About Obama's Ramadan Proclamation

[thespartander]

This is one of the times I dont believe in freedom of speech or the press. At lesat to imbeciles like them.

[wyk2369]

I love how Obama tries to be a great president, but fox news and co. call him a communist and question his ways of trying to bring the country together, and rednecks believe it and all the ideas that would have benefited america are thrown out. Fox News...smh

[Kenny722]

Really?!?! You have got to be kidding me.

[RickyAFlores]

Fox news should go die in a hole

[frostedlambs]

wow fox news is a stupid peace of shit for dip shits

[buddo1999]

It may be advisable for Obama to express his love for Jesus Christ at these dinners with the Muslims and at Ramadan while on vacation... After all, it was the many Christians that voted and helped win the office...

[AldossariEOS]

It's Muslim, not Muzlim.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

check this out youtube dot com /DioQooFIcgE look what I found explaining what I have been trying to do.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

Maybe you all haven't read Karl Marx's work. "Democracy is the road to socialism." — Karl Marx (father of communism) Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism... ALL want MORE government control. Anarchy is NO government. Simply divide the word... an=absence of, without... A republic is small government controlled BY THE PEOPLE and kept in check by LAW.

it's not really that difficult.

[myvoiceismypass]

Some comments seem to be confusing the political spectrum to equal everything their side isn't, and that's untrue and false. Fascism =/= Communism, they are two opposite extremes. Quit watching Fox News, it's making you look like an idiot online.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@myvoiceismypass I don't watch Fox News or Glenn Beck. get over yourself.

[myvoiceismypass]

@StrengthFromAbove83 I'll get over myself, when you learn something you should have learned in 8th grade middle school.

[shoryuken202]

Ay Fox News!!! U JELLY???

[kolbek2001]

Sounds like you libs are a little defensive. Could it be they have a point. You certainly are rabid in your statements. Again, those that are the most testy are usually the ones that are left explaining or defending themselves. I am not a "Christian" per se, or religious. However, in my humble opinion (note I don't state my opinion with so much arrogance as you four), it is clear Obama has a bit of a soft spot for Islam, and has made no effort to suck up to any Christian people.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@kolbek2001 a LITTLE defensive? They are ALWAYS defensive...

[Uratashi]

@kolbek2001 His only mistake was singling out any religion at all. To satisfy everyone then, he'd have to support every other religion.

[OhNoItsSluggo]

Fuck all of these fuckers. Fox and Friends are the fucking worst. I hate them.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@OhNoItsSluggo yeah, well, they aren't socialists who support the SAME THINGS THAT HITLER DID...

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 Godwin's Law: "A term that originated on Usenet, Godwin's Law states that as an online argument grows longer and more heated, it becomes increasingly likely that somebody will bring up Adolf Hitler or the Nazis. When such an event occurs, the person guilty of invoking Godwin's Law has effectively forfieted the argument."

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 right. Or people like you can ignore history and allow this nation to keep falling deeper into socialism and debt. Facts are facts. History is history. Most philosophy is complete trash. Come back with something valid.

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 Oh, but I did respond to your historical falsehood regarding slavery with facts. My source? "The Abolitionist Legacy" by McPherson. You ignored it. Anyways, while both the USSR and Fascist states were based on military authoritarianism, the Social Darwinism of Fascism is the direct antithesis of the supposed egalitarianism of Communist states. Sorry, it seems that you are the one ignoring History here.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 Fascism, Nazism (a form of socialism), Socialism, Communism, and even Democracy... ALL lead to Oligarchy. ALL are far left leaning forms of government. Democracy is obviously more in the middile, but still left-leaning. Rome turned into a democracy and FELL... and as history has shown they and others fell hard due to democracy. Far right is NO government... anarchy. which again, still leads to oligarchy. This nation was founded as a REPUBLIC for a reason.

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 Why do you believe that Nazism is a form of socialism? What specific policies did Germany take in the 1930s that leads you to that conclusion? In addition, what is your source for that information? In addition, your comments on Rome are baffling; if ever there was an oligarchy, it was the Republic, with enfranchisement for only the Patricians. When Rome fell it was to German kings in the West and the Turkish Sultan Mehmed II in the East. Democratic reforms were not involved.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 Why do I believe that Nazism is a form of socialism? It IS socialism. Do some research on the German Nazi Party. They were called the National Socialist Party. Why do I need a source for something so obvious? This is a well-known fact. The founding fathers of this nation founded it as a Republic. One reason they used was Rome. That is why they did not found this nation as a Democracy. They knew better. Yes, but what LED to Rome's fall? What led to those events... gov fail.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 Rome's government slowly changed from a Republic to a democracy to an oligarchy. The government took care of the people and the economy crashed and there were many welfare-like programs in Rome at the time. The government took more and more power FROM the people... much like the Nazis did in Germany... much like is happening now in the US. More taxes equals less freedom.

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 Your bit about Rome: patently untrue. Try reading Gibbon's "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" or at least something by classicist Michael Grant. And what did you cite about the Nazis? Their name. I asked about their specific policies. What sources can you provide, either primary or secondary, that supports that conclusion? In addition, your political spectrum is very suspect; how do you account for most Anarchists holding radical left-wing views? Where did you find it?

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 WHY do liberals want EVERYONE to cite sources as if they don't know HOW to look them up themselves... spoon fed sheep is what you people are... disgusting... I suppose you think the FDA is your friend... and obama is helping the US... lol

[myvoiceismypass]

@StrengthFromAbove83 You're assuming I'm a "liberal". People like yourself assume more than ask question. You only can label, insult, and generally be an ass towards others online. You'll never admit you have faults like the rest of us. Oh no, you're perfect and 100% right about everything, and when someone calls you out on your bullshit, you get mad instead of learning the truth. You sir, are obsolete and an idiot that assumes more than you honestly will ever know.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@myvoiceismypass look up Nazism in wiki... it even says that Nazism is a form of socialism. Label and insult? yet, YOU PEOPLE assume that i watch Fox and Glenn Beck? I never said I was perfect, but I know what forms of government work and what they do. I haven't said one word of bullshit. Our president uses socialist principles. That is obvious.

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 All you seem to be capable of is hyperbolic rhetoric and ad hominem attacks. If you want to change someone's mind, you have to present them with the information they are lacking. The key to any argument, from Plato to the present, is providing information to the opposing party with your sources so they can educate themselves and change their mind. That isn't partisanship at all, that is merely enlightened debate.

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 Proverbs 13:5, Matthew 7:1, Matthew 7:23. I will pray for you.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 oh. would you like to talk about the Bible now? The Bible covers a free-market better than anything ever has.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 You do realize that Christians ARE to judge each other, right? lol

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 a REAL Christian would not vote for someone like Obama. a REAL Christian would know what the founders stood for because it is Biblically-based.

[waleedanjum1991]

@StrengthFromAbove83 so ur telling me that people should vote for Presidents that are Christian????

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@waleedanjum1991 not necessarily... just a president that doesn't say the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR are friends of the US.

[myvoiceismypass]

Fascism is not LEFT LEANING.  You sir, need to get your ass back in school! I learnt this shit in 8th grade ffs!

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@myvoiceismypass LOL... then why does it want MORE government control? JUST LIKE other left leaning forms of government. 

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@myvoiceismypass you learned that in school... which doesn't say much since the American education system SUCKS.

[SolidCorn]

Easter is hardly a religious holiday. It's way too commercialized.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@SolidCorn it IS a religious holiday... it's commercialized by the left-wing media.

[kajillion]

"Why isn't there an outreach to the Christian world?" You mean like America? Get bent, Gretchen.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@kajillion No, like the Christians in Indonesia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Libya, etc, etc... being SLAUGHTERED by Muslims FOR.... being Christians. I can show you photo and video of this.

[acdburn0]

You know, these people get so huffy over every little thing, sometimes I wonder if the only thing that would satisfy them is a return to slavery, the institution of a Calvinist theocracy and the further transformation of American cities into Dickensian wastelands. Maybe we'll stop hearing their inane whining then.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 TOO BAD SLAVERY WAS SUPPORTED BY THE LEFT.... NOT THE RIGHT....

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 Haha, thanks.  Needed a good hearty laugh this morning!

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@acdburn0 yeah... history is hard to swallow sometimes huh?

[acdburn0]

@StrengthFromAbove83 Well certainly both pro and anti slavery positions cloaked themselves in religious rhetoric, so direct comparisons there don't wash. But the pro slavery South justified their ideology by cloaking it in a state's rights argument identical to what contemporary conservatives profess. In addition, some modern conservatives are the inheritors of a long tradition of socially regressive policies that can trace their origins to the Jim Crow laws of the Reconstruction era South.