this jump wrote history. but the signing at the side of the ground here is very poor. the organisators should have made that more marked that the peaple can read the meters easier
SPECTACULAR JUMP! I see that the ignorant imbeciles that get on youtube to proclaim drug use are rearing their ugly heads. If all you can do is sit on your ass and point fingers, you are better off, as are others, keeping your opinions to yourself. Get some proof and stop with the ASSumptions.
I belive that most of the female world records during the 1980´s was doping records, maybe a few clean ones but not, 100 , 200 , 400, 100 mhurdles, shootput, longjump, I think those records are records set by cheaters!
@tonicmass the problem with this is that training routines included drug dosages-from the early 1960s. the sport didnt treat them as cheaters, and for some time just turned a blind eye to it. only when the mid-late 1970s came did the anti drug position gather momentum. when testing started, then actual cheating started. since then its been harder and harder to cheat, and those who do cheat are forced to use exotic and far less effective methods. test gives much greater gains for women than men.
I agree with speedyslime93 about the landing, she would have lost potentially almost a foot. He position in the air wasn't great but here runnup and take off I can't fault. Textbook, shorten & sink into the board flat-footed to maximise take-off power.
what i want to know is how on earth a female athlete jumped that far with such a poor landing. she lost about a foot because her butt fell into the sand prematurely instead of her thrusting it into the mark created by the feet like most horizontal jumpers do- if she had she could have jumped nearly 8 metres which is on par with the world-class male athletes of today!
If you look at the slow motion part of the video, you'll see that her rear does in fact land past the point of impact of her right foot. Her left foot was too far out in front of her to have a chance at making that distance, but her right foot was the closest point of impact in the sand to the take-off board. She did not lose any distance on this jump...it was a very well excecuted take-off and landing.
you must be watching a different video....watch her hip position about 5-6 steps out to generate a takeoff angle. Also the angle of her thigh/shin his great, plenty of technique there.
Exactly! Great speed with a fast drive knee flexion creating a great take-off angle while maitaining speed. Great extension on the landing as well except for the errant right leg trailing the left.
I totally agree with you, great tecnique, great takeoff with only a few cm left on the lane. It's obvious she was doped but she was also a great athlete.
Man there must have been high altitude! Just like at how she keeps flying and flying and flying... She is just doing nothing while in mid-air :D unbelieveable
I didn't realise how fast Chistyakova was in her run-up. I've seen Pedroso's 8.96m from a couple of angles, but Powell's 8.99m and Heike's 7.63 elude me
Monster jump, but I prefer Drechsler and Joyner-Kersee's styles.
ThomasRiekki 9 months ago
Saying this is a poor landing is like to say Neal Armstrong did a poor mooning,finish the schools at least before using internet.
Bajinjo 1 year ago
this jump wrote history. but the signing at the side of the ground here is very poor. the organisators should have made that more marked that the peaple can read the meters easier
diegoribasx 1 year ago
every country dope with anabolika in the 80´s...
munkhut 1 year ago
Fabulous height and hang technique. And clearly doped to the gills. This is very much like Robert Emmiyan's monster leap in 87.
KingLiopleurodon 1 year ago
SPECTACULAR JUMP! I see that the ignorant imbeciles that get on youtube to proclaim drug use are rearing their ugly heads. If all you can do is sit on your ass and point fingers, you are better off, as are others, keeping your opinions to yourself. Get some proof and stop with the ASSumptions.
MarlonBrandoSoSexy 1 year ago
OMDAIZ! women are not to be underestimated, shes so powerfull during her jump! its unbelievable!
Chukojc94 1 year ago
she didnt even do flight in the air correctly and its still so huge!
Triplejump96 2 years ago
STEROIDS!!!!
nrno 2 years ago
I think don't exist an athlete male or female cleaned in world class.Whitout roids can't compete .
furaskin 2 years ago
Jade Johnson will beat this in 2012. Its nuthin to her
1simplyamazin1 2 years ago
This is my goal.
PinkSportOvertim3 2 years ago
VERY FANTASTIC!ª!!!
atleta95aitana 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
100m and 200 m WR were made 100% without doping. Flo-Jo was an unique talent and trained much harder than anyone else.
papmjny 2 years ago
Yeah right.
etuoyo 2 years ago 2
I belive that most of the female world records during the 1980´s was doping records, maybe a few clean ones but not, 100 , 200 , 400, 100 mhurdles, shootput, longjump, I think those records are records set by cheaters!
tonicmass 2 years ago 22
Certainly yes,but the same thing for the men!
furaskin 2 years ago
Comment removed
furaskin 2 years ago
@tonicmass the problem with this is that training routines included drug dosages-from the early 1960s. the sport didnt treat them as cheaters, and for some time just turned a blind eye to it. only when the mid-late 1970s came did the anti drug position gather momentum. when testing started, then actual cheating started. since then its been harder and harder to cheat, and those who do cheat are forced to use exotic and far less effective methods. test gives much greater gains for women than men.
rcaddict72 1 year ago
@tonicmass the same with a lot of male records, but the longjump final today was like half a meter less so i guess thats a bit strange ;-)
1978utreg 5 months ago
What an athlete!Her height is 1,69 and weight 53 kg...If she was higher could compete with the boys..
furaskin 2 years ago 2
not only did her butt land in front of her feet, her left foot landed way further than her right, it landed almost at 8 metres!!
gregsk2012 2 years ago
I agree with speedyslime93 about the landing, she would have lost potentially almost a foot. He position in the air wasn't great but here runnup and take off I can't fault. Textbook, shorten & sink into the board flat-footed to maximise take-off power.
samabercrombie 2 years ago 2
what i want to know is how on earth a female athlete jumped that far with such a poor landing. she lost about a foot because her butt fell into the sand prematurely instead of her thrusting it into the mark created by the feet like most horizontal jumpers do- if she had she could have jumped nearly 8 metres which is on par with the world-class male athletes of today!
speedyslime93 2 years ago 9
And she was only 1,69 for 53 kg!
furaskin 2 years ago
STEROIDS!!!!
nrno 2 years ago
@speedyslime93
If you look at the slow motion part of the video, you'll see that her rear does in fact land past the point of impact of her right foot. Her left foot was too far out in front of her to have a chance at making that distance, but her right foot was the closest point of impact in the sand to the take-off board. She did not lose any distance on this jump...it was a very well excecuted take-off and landing.
JAVMAN83 1 year ago
@speedyslime93
How much shit talk in only 1 post kid.
In long jump doping counts as alchool counts for driving.
Try to use steroids and than come back and tell me if you jump any longer
Bajinjo 1 year ago
@speedyslime93 the answer is a good steroids regime
oygk 1 year ago
@speedyslime93 soviets and east germans were all on steroids in those days
1488slav 7 months ago
@1488slav
also americans, 100-200m female record is made by doping, Flo died for it.
anonimoXXsec 6 months ago
All drugs! Landing was HORRIBLE! my word...cool though...
jumperuk 2 years ago 2
The landing is terrible. It would be further if she had a better landing.
BostromSweden 2 years ago 4
hmm it was speed and power little technique
cabsta136 3 years ago 4
como se jaquea
Natalie2angelito 3 years ago
¿Jaquea?.
UglyChannel 3 years ago
thats incleibel
cangurin91 3 years ago
no technique whatsoever, just drugs
Aeneiden 3 years ago
you must be watching a different video....watch her hip position about 5-6 steps out to generate a takeoff angle. Also the angle of her thigh/shin his great, plenty of technique there.
jumpstar2006 3 years ago 5
Exactly! Great speed with a fast drive knee flexion creating a great take-off angle while maitaining speed. Great extension on the landing as well except for the errant right leg trailing the left.
JAVMAN83 2 years ago 2
I totally agree with you, great tecnique, great takeoff with only a few cm left on the lane. It's obvious she was doped but she was also a great athlete.
turboreattore 2 years ago
Man there must have been high altitude! Just like at how she keeps flying and flying and flying... She is just doing nothing while in mid-air :D unbelieveable
learntoplayy 3 years ago
El mejor salto de la historia.
todavía está vigente el record.
Gracias por el video.
antoniogarciasanTA 3 years ago 2
I didn't realise how fast Chistyakova was in her run-up. I've seen Pedroso's 8.96m from a couple of angles, but Powell's 8.99m and Heike's 7.63 elude me
bossofalltime 3 years ago
where are these vids please id like 2 c them?
speedyo93 3 years ago
I used to have Pedroso's 8.96m on VHS. As for the others, I'm sure they'll turn up on youtube, somebody must have them
bossofalltime 3 years ago
I want to see any jumps from Sestriere, I want Ivan Pedroso's 8.96 and I want Mike Powell's 8.99
HandyTheXxxX 3 years ago
Thanks for this video! I wonder if there's also Heike Drechsler's 7.63m jump from Sestriere 1992 available somewhere...
vychlazenejgambac 3 years ago
7.63? was that with the wind, wasn't it?
Thund3rxD 3 years ago
It was a great jump, the first 25 footer for a woman but windy at +2.1m/s. You should watch it sometime...
1981aLaN 3 years ago
this worldrecord isbecose drugs
TheBobbyDylan 3 years ago