Added: 2 years ago
From: TheAlexJonesChannel
Views: 58,346
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (415)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • all my friends are fucked from weed 

  • @reptile1000 - I'll bet your weed-smoking "friends" would be interested to find out you're the kind of person who talks about his "friends" that way.

  • @mikespulligan they openly admit they are damaged from it i'm not naming names here

  • @reptile1000 LOL i have known people like that..you dont have to be a damn pot head and smoke em like ciggs..just have one when your in pain! or if you just smoke'n it to relax do it at night b4 bed..yeah if your gonna be a hard core pot head youll end up a bit slow lol i know one pot head who is one of the smartest people i have met! cant tell ya how that works lol guess depends on the person..

  • @juniorkitty11 exactly

  • @reptile1000 what i dont get is how we can have beer! go drink and drive, beat up our loved ones! and just go on a all out ram page lol we see it all the time..but we dont see vids of pot smokers cause they are not doing anything news worthy lol just chilling with friends do'n no harm to anyone..oh that makes em terrorists lmao..and truthfully if pot was in stores, it would suck! again they would controll it lmao..no winning with them

  • @juniorkitty11 i never said weed is worse than alcohol haha the problem with is it can cause things like depression anxiety depersonalisation and just general laziness and lack of enthusiasm even psychosis like one of my friends had

  • @40oz2coolidge Glad I could help open your mind to new ideas.

  • @40oz2coolidge Why do we need private schools? Because we don't fund public schools enough. Look to Western Europe for how schooling should work. And private schools are grossly over-priced and not at all accessible to most of the population.

  • @872463051 We need an opt-out to public schools. Tax breaks for people who decide not to use the public school system. It's either that, or get government out of the business of education. Why? Because the government is indoctrinating kids using the school system. Homeschool or private school all the way. You'll only be wise enough to do this if you're aware of the movement toward world government.

  • @gutzs Beyond the fact that this is extremely off-topic, you're wrong. I could go on about why you're wrong, but I can't be bothered, so I'm just going to leave it at that. Have a nice day.

  • @872463051 Righhhht...The new world order doesn't exist. Life is peaches and cream and the government loves you. Peace and flowers! Government loves us and takes care of us! =D

  • @gutzs Haha, definitely didn't say that, either.

  • @872463051 Well, only someone who actually believes those things is going to be in favor of more government involvement in education.

  • @gutzs And only someone who is opposed to government involvement in education clearly has no concept for societal gains. Not to mention the fact that there is no requirement to send your children to public schools.

  • @872463051 No, theres no requirement to attend them, but there is a requirement to pay for them. Why should someone who does not want their kid indoctrinated with whatever the government wants kids to be taught have to pay for other people's kids? They are saving the public system money by not sending their kid to public school, so why should they pay the same rate?

  • @gutzs For the same reason that you pay taxes on anything else. You may not use the bridge down the street that's falling apart. Does that mean you shouldn't pay to fix it? Or to put out the fire that happened a few blocks away? Or to investigate a shooting a few neighborhoods away? Shall I go on? It doesn't matter if you directly reap the benefits. People getting educated helps the country and society as a whole. Now, if we want to talk about education reform, that's another issue.

  • @872463051 I would like to see education reform, but I don't want government in charge of the reform. Why SHOULD I trust the people who mucked it up in the first place? I wouldn't mind paying taxes for it so much if the government didn't have so much direct control over what the schools have to teach.

  • @gutzs My bottom line is also that competition breeds quality. The government doesn't have any competition in the department of free schooling. They can do whatever the hell they want with it without risking people moving away from the system, and that is, in my opinion, very wrong.

  • @gutzs No disagreements.

  • @872463051 had to comment! people pay for public school.which is fine.why shouldnt they.but im confussed why you would want more gov involvement with education! they own it now! we have been lied to all through school..im not even sure of half the stuff we learned now..they are teaching kids about nwo now! wtf! we need real schools with no gov involvement! then we would have well educated children..till then they will be dumbed down by the wonderfull education system!

  • @40oz2coolidge Why do you think we are smart? Couldn't possibly be because we have a great education system (for how little we fund it, anyway)

  • @40oz2coolidge You mean when we were a mostly-agricultural and partly-industrial country? You could get away with people not being educated. Now, we rely on an intelligent population to run our country. And, besides the fact that we DO have a voluntary army, back when the country started, an army could be men with rifles. See how well that would fly now. This isn't 200 years ago. Just because something worked then, doesn't mean it'll work now. (and you know they had taxes 200+ yeas ago, right?)

  • @40oz2coolidge How do you suggest they get paid for? Magic? And anarchists would hate taxes. Libertarians want as few as are necessary to pay for the government.

  • @40oz2coolidge a) Every product is taxed. b) If you don't like taxes, I guess you also don't like roads, public schools, police, a military, or a government at all, then? and c) being a libertarian doesn't mean you don't like taxes.

  • @40oz2coolidge No. Decriminalized just means smaller possession are civil, not criminal offenses (which means it's treated like a parking ticket). That means growing is still illegal.

  • one of the best movie that i ever watched..saw this in webmovietube

  • I dont feel human, If I dont have the right to grow a natural plant which has medical properties which the creator has given to us, What rights do I have? Really?

  • hempcar hempoil can run cars trucks and produce electricity hemp is co2 converter replace all plastics make ropes eliminate all kinds of pollutions processes! but is it federal protected or legalized no because of redneck asshole judges lawyers and govenors politiicans and military!

  • Good Video! This Radiated BONG HIT Is 4 U BRO!!

  • @AUSM92 Not once did I suggest a utopia or perfection of any type. I only suggest a best possible realistic solution, which would need to include taxes and regulations, the latter of which is necessary to keep a safe final product (not laced). As for cartels, if there are no regulations, the cartel could very well stay in place. It is indicative of a black market, which doesn't necessarily mean weed needs to be illegal.

  • @AUSM92 1. I know... I said that it's not utopic. That was your word, not mine.

    2. I gave plenty of reasons before why regulation is needed. To sum it up, it makes sure that the product that people are consuming is safe to use and was grown in reasonable circumstances (i.e. not from a Mexican cartel)

    3. Great argument! I love when people stoop to the level of insulting someone who you have never met before with untrue and immature remarks.

  • @AUSM92 The point isn't how you happen to feel about taxes, because frankly, I don't care. I don't care about creating a tax-free utopia (partially because a utopia is impossible), and the bottom line is, in America currently (because that's what this film is about), if marijuana is legalized, it will need to be taxed and regulated, whether you happen to like taxes and regulations or not. Plus I really don't want to get into why you are wrong about a system without taxes.

  • @AUSM92 regardless of if every USDA and FDA regulation is perfect, it certainly keeps products safer than pre-USDA/FDA. Whether you like it or not, regulations and taxes are not only essential, but inevitable. The most we can do is hope that they are minimal and don't go beyond the scope of what they are there to do.

  • @AUSM92 Reasonable amounts of taxes and regulations are necessary. Every single thing that is consumed in the US is regulated to some degree (food, toys, advertisements, legal drugs, etc...), and marijuana should be no different. Same thing goes for taxes. Nearly everything is taxed at some point, be it the production/manufacture, transportation, sale, etc, it regulates prices and provides government revenue. I don't see how taxing it funds anything other than the US government.

  • made my day!!! thanks webmovietube

  • Great distraction and great vide0!! thank u webmovietube

  • It should be legal to grow anything made by God,especially in the" Land of The Free"..

  • @jroc889 its funny because you are complaining that someone else is being a bigot while being a bigot towards his ideas...

  • PUT PROP 19 BACK ON THE BALLOT IN 2012 and MARIJUANA WILL BE LEGAL FOR CALI.

  • wat if prop 19 would off passed???

  • That's a lie, In 2009 Californians did not receive any IOU's. There was a fear and still is a fear, but not one IOU was handed out, the special programs (Like welfare and IHSS Ronald Regen signed in) got cut instead.

  • What is the name of the song at the end?

  • great docu thnx

  • Tea is a plant so are they going to outlaw Tea to? mother nature put this plant on this earth for a reason so did the government create all these medicines and REAL DRUGS cocaine/PCP etc. for a reason to and im sure everybody knows the reason.

  • "Doesn't making nature against the law a little paranoid...?"

    - Bill Hicks.

  • i LOVED this movie

  • wow

  • The problem with alex jones is he is so right about so many things but he interpetation is totally wrong.

    Globalisation is good we are evolving. Yes we are ruled by people other than we think we are yes there are conspiracies but this is just the begining not of our demise but of becoming a type 1 civilisation.

    Nuclear fusion and a unified economy will bring an end to starvation, war and poverty and it will mean we reach for the stars.

  • @srspower You are truly deluded. Their won't be any reaching for anything because when it comes down to it, we are economic slaves Controlling us through debt, forcing people into labour to pay off debt, while at the same time being minipulated through controlled advertising to endlessly consume goods. Nuclear is a highly dangerous and costly method of creating energy, and like burning fossil fuels, its just in place to create profit. Solar,Wind,Wave,Geothermal are much safer and harmless.

  • @Jimmyswan2007

    No need to get personal mate, i am not deluded. Who is this dastardly individual you believe is all seeing and all knowing controlling us all?

    You really think there is a conspiracy of corperations controlling us to do there bidding? Thats total bollocks apple can't even get along with adobe over a stupid piece of software. Corperations do rule but they bicker and fall out and compete with each other just as much as countries do.

  • why should we have to tax this period. Tired of my money disappearing to feds. Its a natural thing. We should be able to do whatever and grow whatever just like our other agricultural veg. Or wuld u be an idiot to think corn is dangerous an if we make it or buy it off a FARMER OR DRUG DEALER IS WHAT THEY CAN CALL IT. DONT BE A IDIOT AN THINK IT JUS 4 POT HEADS TO SMOKE ANYTIME. ITS OUR FREEDOM DUMBASS

  • hey look its bill hicks

  • I could use some HELP! as I have a jury trial coming up on Aug 23 in Santa Maria. I have State ID card, a member of a collective and have my doctors reccomendation. Transportation of over one ounce (ounce and a half ) also intent to sell.. My public defender is very confontational with me, and I am afraid she will not prepare for this upcoming trial.After pleading guilty to possession of under an ounce and paid a $50 fine the judge 2 weeks later brought me in refunded my $50 and is retrying me.

  • Decriminalizing it doesn't do shit! It's nice to know that you won't get arrested for smoking a joint at your house, but you still need to go to drug dealers to buy it. We have to legalize it, regulate it, and tax it!

  • @872463051 .. How about home grown being totally legal to own and use in the home?. This would slow the flow over the borders and take lots of profit from the gangs..And would be inline with the Constitution..

  • @JaxxBat That would of course be a step in the right direction, but the Federal and state governments need to legalize and tax it (states can have a sales tax, US can have a tax on its interstate transport and growth). Plus, growing a plant is a lot of work, and I'm not sure a lot of people would opt for growing their own when you could just go buy some weed from a dealer.

  • @872463051 .. More and more folks are gettin into home grown with all the risk of makin a buy, I would think..Why do you wanna give the gov more taxes, they just grow and give us less for it?

  • @JaxxBat Home growing is great if you have the time and patience to grow one, the money for the equipment, and own a home of your own. Most people don't have most of those luxuries, and while being a huge step in the right direction, it wouldn't really address the true problem. And the government having more money means they have more room to keep messing up without the country collapsing, and weed would actually be cheaper because of lowered risk, even with taxes if it were legal.

  • @872463051 .....I am a Libertarian, I am not in favor of "feeding the beast" does not matter the reasoning..Most folks do have a home with a place to grow(ref to balcony,roof,yard,etc).. This is a Constitutional issue ,gov has not rights (sighting "probable cause" and a shame).Federal laws need to stop at one's door, period..BTW federal gov need to honor the Constitution and go on diet.They are way to big...There is no other solution, no matter how good your intentions are.. Thankyou.. GB

  • @JaxxBat I'm basically a Constitutionalist, myself, so I'm not going to get into any of that, but basically, allowing home growth would be a start. Ultimately, the federal government has no say as long as it stays within the state, and I think they ought to take advantage of the opportunity to regulate (tax) it's interstate trade, as they have the Constitutional right to do. Also, there are certain things that can't stop at ones door... Weed isn't one of them, but they exist.

  • @872463051 .. so you are in favor of having all the 200 other herbals taxed and gov controlled too?,, including vitamins the FDA would love to control..Look at the big picture, gov is way to big and in everyone's biz,always lookin for another law to slap on your tale..

  • @JaxxBat I'm not exactly an expert on any other herbals, so I can't really speak for them. In the Preamble to the Constitution, it says that, among other jobs, the government is there to "promote the general welfare." This means that they have the authority to protect its citizens from dangerous substances. This is why the government should have its hands out of weed but still control other dangerous substances. Its taxation would be no different from anything else that's taxed.

  • @872463051 . How does "protecting" equate to taxation?.. So they are going to tax anything they consider a public hazard,even if its not?.. This leaves the door totally open for Socialists that think they know whats "good" for America..One thing about the Constitution: Just because something is Constitutional it does not mean an entity(gov) or person should act on it, but gov is acting & pushing on any part of the it they can get away with..Do you?.if you did you would get locked up..TY

  • @872463051 .. I think decriminalizing is a good start.. Keeping young people out of jail is more important than all this legal & tax talk..

  • @JaxxBat Not really... Decriminalizing it is beating around the true issue. The true issue isn't really keeping kids out of jail... Most of the people in jail for weed violations are the dealers, who are still criminals. The biggest issues are government size and saving lives with the drug trade, with a secondary issue of raising/saving money. All of which are accomplished with legalization, not decriminalization.

  • @872463051 What people need is freedom though. The freedom of a free market where people can buy what they want without going to jail or being taxed.

  • @TimeLord361 We have a freedom to use the free market, yes, but there is no freedom from taxes in any modern system of government. This is because, according to the social contract, we need to give up basic rights so the government will be able to protect ours, and a government with no revenue can't protect its citizens' freedoms. If you think you should be free from paying taxes, then there will be essentially no government to protect your freedoms.

  • @872463051 your retarded... how about you legalize it, grow it and fuck taxes...

  • @CORACUPCAKE Yeah, I have nothing against growing it yourself. That's just not possible for everybody, so you also have to be able to buy from legal means, as well as headshop.

  • @872463051

    More bureaucracy and red tape is not going to help.

    Do you also know about Mon Santos? Do you really want them to get a patent?

  • @Gettinghitonattheban Taxing it just like any other product is not adding unnecessary bureaucracy. That's like saying if a company makes a new product, it's adding bureaucracy because it's another thing that needs to be taxed and regulated. It should be treated just like any other product on the market, all of which are taxed and regulated. And Monsantos would not be getting any marijuana seed patents.

  • dont they have people who dont look like there perma stoned or sound fruity as shit that could stand up for this cause? say hell yeah make it legal for everyone not just the almost dead ones. you should not have to have aids to smoke a joint. Obama wont make weed legal by the way, sorry to have to predict that one

  • @trinity777b It's not up to Obama, jackass, it's up to the people.

  • @4cellar2door0 no jackass its not up to the people and they proved that, its up to your leaders to demand the federal government to obey states rights you jackass.. the people spoke already and the government refused to listen jackass.. get some knowledge before speaking and you would know that its legal in allot of states yet the federal government refuses to listen to the people and they keep raiding and arresting.. jackass....

  • They are just filling the prisons

  • I so ridiculous that several states have legalized marijuana,but the rest haven't.i just don't get it.

  • I like keeping my lungs clean. Potheads keeping killing your lungs i dont care

  • @Obelisk3rdEye cigarettes kill lungs, and if ur lungs are dead there's always medical herbs i.e. cannabis... and this is from clinics and hospitals not sayers and cooks.

  • @uzmynem

    So youre saying marijuana does not affect ppl's lungs? AT ALL? Im going to ask my doctor and if he says yes you must agree to get your yellow teeth kicked in.

  • @Obelisk3rdEye

    better ask your neurochemist or neuroscientist, they're the ones who do the research and have all the knowledge...

    p.s. I did not say AT ALL, why they could even have a + effect.

  • @uzmynem

    Yellow teeth kicked in.

  • @Obelisk3rdEye

    what does yellow teeth mean? is that some1 who smokes?

  • no someone who doesn't brush their teeth Hahahaha

  • @Obelisk3rdEye nice tangent. lol

  • @Obelisk3rdEye Marijuana does not affect the lungs any differently than any other plant you heat up and inhale.

    A vaporizer solves this.

    Oh, and even if you don't use a vaporizer, who cares.

    Weed never killed anybody.

    Ever.

  • @4cellar2door0

    I'll check up on that but since you are knowledge in this area can i ask you a question? Is weed good for your eyes? Does it help the eye in any way?

  • @Obelisk3rdEye

    Yes it cures glaucoma. Not treats CURES. It can stop you going blind.

  • @srspower

    What about for any other eye condition ? Would if help?

  • @Obelisk3rdEye

    Depends on what it is. Marijuana treats a great many things but it doesn't cure everything!

  • @bumnus: That's a surprisingly thoughtful and reasoned response; far too many Christians that I've spoken to are ignorant of the Church's history.

  • @bumnus: You do know that for over a thousand years, Catholicism *was* Christianity, right? It wasn't until the 16th century, with the invention of the printing press and the translation of the Bible into English, that the forebears of modern Evangelical Christianity developed.

    Or are you saying that for a full thousand years, Christianity as men knew it was a false religion? If so, then William Tyndale would be the man who revealed "God's Word", and he's not in the Bible.

  • Alex Jones is pro-weed? Wow. Good for him. This is the first time I've heard him talk 100% sense, and on the last subject I'd ever have expected him to hit bang on the money. He just shot up about a million points in my estimation; right on, Alex J!

  • watch this on other websites you can just look

  • umm, read up on the news. Marijuana is NOT legal in Holland just tolerated and now your government is closing up shops. Soon marijuana will be an arrestable offense in the near future. Vancouver (aka Vansterdam) will be the new Amsterdam and the west parts of the united states in the near future will be the new Amsterdam, just mark my words

  • @korfx04: It's a thin distinction between legal and "tolerated", semantics really. "Tolerating" it is just Holland's compromise with the rest of Europe; the Dutch would legalise if they could, because their culture is historically exceptionally tolerant and trade-oriented; they don't care about moral crusades when there's a deal to be made. Coke and Ecstasy are illegal there too, but you can score them on the street just by raising your hand and whistling.

  • @bumnus Right on! I'm a medical permit holder.God made weed, man made speed... who do you trust?

  • Cannabis is not a remarkably safe "medication." Come on. If tobacco is bad how can cannabis sativa not be bad? Hello. Carbon monoxide in your brain cannot be good. Sorry. I'm all for freedom but smoking is not good for you... regardless of what plant it is. Peace.

  • @brianpadraic: So you're anti-weed on the basis that ingesting any hot smoke is obviously bad for you. Ok, fair enough; on that score you're right. But beyond that, the comparison with tobacco ends. You don't have to smoke weed; you can eat it, drink it, or make it into ointment and rub it on your skin. Smoking is just the most common method. And in every other regard, self medication with marijuana is safer and more effective than any man-made drug.

  • @JCLeSinge LOL! Smoke is smoke. Some worse than others; nonetheless, it is smoke. Smoke is not good for the lungs/heart or brain. You can smoke all you want. I think it should be legal. Just like prostitution, porn and abortion. None of my business, but smoke cannot be good. Later.

  • @brianpadraic Now there are portable vaporizers and yes there are some good ones. A person can use it as medicine or recreationally without any smoke now.

  • the UN thinks war is peace and freedom is security. DECRIMINALIZE WEED

  • i am fucking glad i live in holland!

  • @hiddestoker So are we.

  • Sadly though weed will never hit Texas even if it was legal. damn hardcore religious right.

  • Right on that Alex Jones supports legalization, but I have a hard time believing anything he says.

  • @citizenkong

    some of the paranoia he has is self-afflicted.

  • @THrash3R1041 explain why i am an idiot just because i smoke something you don't piss off you fucking bigot

  • @jroc889 You're an idiot only if you believe that weed leads to mind expansion. Weed is pretty harmless, but there is a lot of bullshit being claimed by marijuana advocates that is simply ridiculous. Also, it is hilarious that people focus on the "natural" talking point as if it meant nothing. Things can be harmful and natural. The drug war is ridiculous, but so is the concept of "NWO". People are making money off the clueless by selling nonsense like this...

  • @dsbnh

    actually there is scientific evidence that cannabis can stimulate the growth of brain cells

    if thats not mind expansion I don't know what is ;)

  • @stupaod Not that, that's for sure. Are you aware of the difference between the mind as a concept and the physical brain? I am no Cartesian, but regardless of what interpretation of the mind you have, growth of brain cells is not mind expansion. For one thing, mind expansion involves a very specific set of phenomena (all of which are bullshit, obviously) and is not simply tantamount to "more brain cells." Do you even know what you are talking about?

  • @stupaod By the way, where is this evidence? I'd like to read this scientific paper because I suspect you're simply referring to brain cells "dying" and then regrowing, in which case this is a normal process that occurs regularly. The only thing that is required to "stimulate" this process is a chemical that will "kill" the brain cells in the first place. Our bodies regenerate brain cells by default.

  • @dsbnh Define mind expansion and maybe we can come to some agreement. Maybe talking to people expands your consciousness, perhaps going somewhere you've never been expands the mind. If those two were true, then so can being high expand ones mind. You treat the mind as if it's the actual brain that could grow in size and develope some super force power. Expanding the mind can be as simple as you digging in your own thoughts and thinking about certain things.

  • @I3utthole Weed is no more conducive to any of these things than simply sitting around and doing some "deep thinking" while sober. The reality is that all you are doing is re-evaluating your thoughts. With weed, you're simply re-evaluating them under the influence and probably gaining less useful insight into your world/life than without it since you are intoxicated. Not much of what you think about will be as brilliant or insightful when you are not high as it was when you were high.

  • @dsbnh HELL NAH ITS NOT A VIOLENT DRUG ITS MELLOW N SUMTIMES U THING STUFF U WULDNT THINK I COULD ONLY IMAGINE ALEX JONES HIGH GO ON FOREVER

  • @dsbnh The founding fathers smoked weed. Are you saying the constitution wasn't brilliant and insightful. When you smoke weed you question the things around you and that is bad for business for those in power.

  • @Mattseeley1987 No, that's not what I am saying at all. Glad you asked, hope this helps!

  • @THrash3R1041 robots are fuckin idiots. go watch sum tv BITCH

  • Fuck yea cuz cali is theee shit!!!

  • I would love to see Alex Jones fully loaded...

    (^_^)

  • So, stay off the dope and stay out of prison. How hard is that?

  • I'll drink to that!

  • Ha,you can end up in prison for that too.I know of a few that have done time for drinking.

  • smoke it, cook it, do what you want with it. It grows naturally. You shouldn't have to go to jail for it. that's the point moron.

  • Ha,well,I know where you're comming from.I smoked dope most of my adult life,from 16 to 50.If someone had suggested that I should quit,I would've reacted the same way.Still,if I had it to do over,I'd never have started.

  • I am amazed at how people still don't seem to get it. Cannabis is a plant that grows naturally; It is not manmade. Who has the right to regulate a plant? Who has the right to say "NO, You may not grow that plant in your backyard and used it for whatever you want to." When did anybody grant a government the power to say you can put this in your body (man made pills) but you can't put that natural plant into your body? When, who, where, and most importantly why do you buy the lie?

  • People have known this for decades. Congratulations.

  • @ladivadivala: You're right. Did you know there's opium in lettuce? Seriously. You can make opium out of lettuce, but do we see lettuce being banned? Banning cannabis makes about as much sense as banning bananas... which can also be used to make psychoactive substances (although the high isn't worth the effort involved).

  • @JCLeSinge Wow! No, I did not know all of that. Thank you for the information JCLeSinge. Peace!

  • @ladivadivala: No problem. The opium in lettuce is Lacticarium, which is a legal substance. You fillet off the brownish bit at the root, crush and chop that into paste, filter out the remaining vegetable matter, drain the remaining brown juice into a shallow dish, and leave it to dry. Takes a few days, but what you're left with is a tarry smear of opium. If you use a wild lettuce (which you can't buy in the shops), you can use the whole plant, not just the root.

  • @JCLeSinge They are going to ban lettuce if people find this out. Hey JCLeSinge did you know that there is a lawsuit going on against Walnuts made by Diamond? The suit is claiming that Diamond can not claim that walnuts have the health benefits that they have because it has not been verified by the FDA. And it is a class action lawsuit too. UNBELIEVABLE.

  • @ladivadivala: Re Walnuts; Codex Alimentarus, mate. Expect a lot more of this kind of thing in the near future.

  • @JCLeSinge And also HR 875 saying it's for our benefits but making it lawful to ban Organic Farming. The bill was introduced by Rosa DeLauro the wife of Stanley Greenburg who works for Monsanto. Now if that isn't a conflict of interest I don't know what is.

  • @ladivadivala: Well, if you open a dictionary and look up "Modern Politics", you'll find the entry reads "See Conflict of Interest."

  • Arizona is next we are going to have elections this year vote to legalize it!

  • were do i go to vote man?

  • we could really use hemp as a food in the form of high quality protein and we could get textiles plastics paints glues anything to build a home to a car anything!!! thats how useful... practically anything..

    hemp being illegal in the freeest country (usa)really is the means by which the 3rd worlds people starve..

    get wise legalize versus legal lies.

  • I am from Bulgaria, should be legalized in California will affect the whole world. there have banned it for the first time 70 years ago. I hope the European Union to legalize :)

  • 0:51

    I thought it was a woman talking lol

  • @RastafariPoet

    THIS IS HILARIOUS

  • Do NOT tax and regulate the self cultivation of Mariuana. I smell a rat in this film. It is propaganda to endorse a tax and regulate model that will most assuredly prohibit "self cultivation." Do not vote for the CA "Oaksterdam" Initiative.

  • @bcainw

    If thats all that passes I'm for that, but I do think we should be free to grow our own. We can grow anything else, why not this too.

  • because they want us to smoke THEIR weed and not OUR weed. God only knows what kinda crap they'll put in there. I'll be damned if I ever smoke a 'regulated' Marlboro or Camel joint.

  • I'm watching the movie now and it is outstanding. I'm going to order copies for my favorite dispensaries and ask them to loan it out to customers who are interested. I think anyone who has an interest in liberty, personal freedom and sick of the effing guv telling them what to do should buy a copy and pass it on to a friend and tell them to pay it forward.

  • Criminal statistics are created through the passing of many laws, laws weather right or not, actual crimes or not, in america it is a crime to "travel in your personal automobile", calling it "driving a motor vehicle". change the words change the meaning, one is free the other is policy(hence the agents are called "police")

  • USA Crime > Total crimes (per capita) 80.0645 per 1,000 people [8th of 60]

    Netherlands Crime > Total crimes (per capita) 79.5779 per 1,000 people

    No feelings or whatever but hard facts

    Look at: nationmaster(.)com for crime rates

  • @Boris013: So, essentially, the legality or criminality of dope makes no real difference to the crime rate. Interesting. There are several ways that could be spun, but the bottom line is that ending prohibition leaves society is no worse off, and would make a large section of the populace very happy.

  • the only thing i see is fear for change

  • "We have previously shown that Cannabinoids induce growth inhibition (restrict) and apoptosis (cell death) in prostate Cancer PC-3 cells"

    PMID: 19690545

    "Breast and Prostate Cancer cells are also sensitive to Cannabinoid-induced antiproliferation (restrict). Regarding the immune system, low doses of Cannabinoids may enhance cell proliferation (spread), whereas high doses of Cannabinoids (Rick Simpson's Cancer Cure Hemp Oil) usually induce growth arrest or apoptosis (cell death)."

    PMID: 11269508

  • The legalisation of recreational drugs is part of the nwo's agenda for total control- well dones Jones you big fat fraud!

  • weed doesent kill ur brain cells as its said to have by the government it actually put them in a dormant state and dossent harm them at all. they are dormaint and in other words alseep.. and when the user finishes the high they wake up again.. also pot has many many uses my dad is dying of cancer in two places in his boddy...i recomend pit to him thru kemo....its also bn proven that pot actually fights cancers and other diseases over 25 majour world wide studies have repoted this to b true...

  • according to you, and your spelling, you must be stoned then. and don't say shit because I fully support hemp legalization.

  • Too bad the marijuana fashion in media, in films, with retard celebs is not about medicine but about being stoned.

    And this the governments all over occidental world want : stoned youth with no aggressivity, no revolt ability, just fascination for drugged mental state.

    Europe is now a flock of stoned sheeps as maybe 30% of -30yo citizen use drugs.

    That's what they want, that's why in Europe it's maybe non legalized, but no judge will ever convict anymone for cannabis related activities.

  • what does it matter how pot is portrayed in hollywood or media? Alcohol companies sell a product based on how much it intoxicates you, n it's the worst thing for your health!! n how can you say people are stoned sheep? thats a fairly bold statement, most legal rights activists wer and are potheads!! Legalize It!!

  • @TheWakey420

    If you weren't that stoned you'd understand that what's in the media is what the system wants. The system works for legalization on the "cultural" front while feigning to be opposed on the legislative front for electoral posture. But their true goal is legalization of soft drugs :

    - they will become the new tobacco, with fiscal earnings,

    - stoned people are NEVER dangerous for a system,

    - they can lead to hard drugs, that they for their dirty black market.

  • Yea i understand all your points, but i think the major reason it isn't legal is also control, and money. The U.S. wants people in jail, they want to fine people 500$ for a roach, i'm sorry bud, i'm stoned, not retarded. There's places in canada (vancouver) that have already tried legalizing all drugs, including heroin, i'm not big on politics, just common sense. not all media is right wing.

  • @TheWakey420

    Legalization is a political project, man : and now, as the cultural victory is at their hand (it's fair to say that "weed won the west", thanks to media propaganda), the system is now preparing for the political push and official legalization. Just in 2009 : Schwarzenegger wants it for California, NY city says it would be great for the economy etc...

    Tax income on soft drugs + population auto-sedation : perfect with the real, huge, economic disaster that's still to come.

  • The whole reason people think weed is evil is because of"Media propaganda".With all the prop. films our grandparents saw, and nixon taking office.I guess i agree with most of what your saying because your just stating facts, but i don't agree with the "sadation" you speak of.Nixon started the war on drugs because he thaught people who are stoned were more apt to revolt, and he was right.And they did.Sounds like you should start smoking bro before you have a heart attack. Ps. You may be the sheep

  • @EricBarbman: " they can lead to hard drugs, that they for their dirty black market."

    This is the key issue: without an agressive medicalization/substitution policy for hard drugs users it can only make the mafias and CIA's still richer and more powerful.

  • @EricBarbman "stoned youth with no aggressivity"

    Well, no for everyone: in the parisian suburbs they smoke hashish as soon as they wake up, then go burn the car of a white neighbour, they stone cops, rape a white girl in a basement, and go have a fight with a rival gang, 200 against 200...

    But when they hear of legalizaation they reply: "Oh no! One just can't say such a thing: thousands of families only depend on this for a living"