Watch The "FORT WORTH GO FED MICPASS" Music Video Now! 18 Hip Hop Artist 1 song & Video Reppin FORT WORTH TEXAS! Feat Vahid, Cas Iron, Trap Squad Cartel, Souhern kappin Soldiers, Kilo Artifact, Riot Squad South, Paperchase records, M.R. Dubb, Otg's AND MANY MORE!! FREE TWISTED BLACK ALL DAY!!
"here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes"
amazing the way it fell, must have had small fires and some minor damage to have fell exactly like WTC7. The demolition company must be saving hundreds of thousands dropping a building using the WTC7 technique.
@tedmaulz Yeah, government officials when planning it all must have realized the trajectory of falling debris from the towers would only gouge out a portion of WTC 7, therefore explaining their cover-up of how it fell! Don't be so dumb!
it's like yesterday to me. I am of nyc. these attacks were 8.5 years ago and still nobody has closure. it's like a deep cut wound festering. i've done numerous demolitions, mapped, surveyed all over nyc and the region. i tire of people avoiding the obvious. that day shows how much bullshit will float after such a evil crime was committed on such a scale. i saw cut beams, nobody cutting it before we got it out! that means people put it there, it was planned and could have been been stopped. mercy
we are expendable. When I was there with my instrument set on my tripod at the wtc site, I saw cut beams, dozens in a row all along the base of the buildings. They were made visible after debris was removed. I helped with that removal. all the bent metal got tossed on a barge to be melted. The cut beams are still stored in hanger 17 in JFK airport. What got me motivated to speak was a person saying the attacks were 11 years ago. People are forgetting, trying to let go because it's too much.
9/11 was the biggest movie set. i worked alongside Port Authority surpervisors as a land surveyor for the Central Survey Group. I worked at all of the facilities. Nobody was cutting until needed. I was there. the beams can be seen cut with a specific bead that only a thermite reaction could have left. Free fall? who can't see that without imagination centered on fact. cut beam, nobody there I knew was cutting unless getting it out for removal. no sir, they were cut on purpose.
I know the building wasn't new, but for some reason I tend to think anything built fro m the post WW II era to the present day is new. Therefore it's interesting when buildings that are not built prior to that period get imploded.
Why are you guys talking about 9/11? it wasent a inside job,if you had common sence you would know that, and whay are we still aguing about a thing that happend 11 years ago. lets just enjoy this vid and how the thinks its the coolist thing ever
@tampabaybucs7 It was an inside job. It was 8.5 tears ago. Steel beams were sliced with demolition material more powerful then those used for this demolition shown. Common sense tells me to question anybody that hides from difficult questions. I could not hide when asked to goto the site to perform volumetrics and tell them how many trucks to use to take out the debris. I saw steel beams sliced as if by light sabers. That's thermite demolition, which takes planning. Do you know how?
@nycmapper Did you ever stop to think that the beams could have been sliced by the iron workers on site?
If they were cut while the building was still intact, how come they were out in the open and clean? Answer: they were cut by iron workers to reduce the size of individual debris ready to be removed.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
7 WTC:
Wasn't hit by a plane.
Fell in 6.6 seconds.
Had witnesses describe sounds of explosions.
NIST's computer model took years to come up with "thermal expansion" causing the collapse, but if the steel was hot enough for "thermal expansion" then the steel would sag: therefore thermal expansion is the least likely cause of the collapse.
This building is not as tall as World trade Center plus they probally did get everyone out of the other buildings right next to the collasping one in this video for the safety reason you just stated (Debris)
@aSASa45454 at the end of the day that doesnt really matter, the fact that they found explosive residue at the WTC site fucks everything in the 9/11 commission report
In 1945 a B25 bomber crashed into the empire state building because of bad visibility (forcing him to fly under the clouds). the fire killed 14 office workers, burned for 7 hours and it still stood
WTC towers burned for 1 hour and went down near freefall speed.
please America, stop lying to yourself. 3000 man and women were killed so America had a reason to invade a country that had black gold under it's soil.
and how hot does jet fuel burn? how hot was required to melt that grade of steel in the tradecenters? wake up, i have alot more facts if you are interested. you could watch loose change, alot of good information for you there. you really look like a paid fed troll right now
you guys are arguing , hurling insults at one another about an unknown neither of you yet comprehend. yes the towers were destroyed, yes tower 7 was detonated, not damaged, yes they only paid 900,000 dollars for a 900,000,000 return on insurence and used it to make new and efficient towers, yes it was not alquade, and anyway alquada works for the CIA still,
no it just reflects that engineering isnt something your are really interested in which beckons the question! ARE YOU REALLY AN ENGINEER??! your not obviously! just a man that has a boat that blows heaps of smoke on startup! yeah real good engineer! i think the valves need setting!! all you can do is throw insults now showing your true mental age!!! where your credentials! fraud boy??!!!! which university did you go to and how long where you there?? rob lazar??! hes a nut job!!!!!!!
you are retarded to think all the shit that happened that day was a coincidence!! so keep on beleiving the bullshit the media pushes and go get yourself vaccinated!!!! sucker
Then why didn't the high rise in madrid fall down? it burned for over 24 hours. it was warped, but did not fall! And if it would have, it would have fell over, not in it's own footprint!
so you are saying steel frame structure built to that standard can burn for 8 hours approx then collapse perfectly at almost freefall speed! gee let me do the math! hey there is no need for demolition crews anymore! just light ramdom fires and building will fall down in a straight line! yay! either that or every building in NY is built way below the fire standard! this is the first time this has ever happened and i dare say it will be the last!!! many steel frame buildings burn! none do this
Yes absolutely, fire will destroy a building if you don't stop it, that's why they have fire protection systems and fire protection on structural steel.
And yes, you can bet they will fall down in a straight line, because that's the direction of gravity.
Please get over yourself and stop pretending like you know what you're talking about, unless you show me you're "math."
whatever! randomly placed fires dont cause perfectly straight collapse! ! so you arent a structural engineer! coz i have heard many angineers with alot more experience than you on the topic of wtc7 so get a second opinion! i beleive them not you! the building would have tipped at least slightly towards the more effected areas! please explain!!!! architects and engineers for 911 truth was set up because of this event! WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! PERIOD
haha! very funny! look i dont want 911 to be an inside job job i just cant understand why the building in madrid would burn so long and not fall! why there is no footage of pentagon impact even though there are 86 cameras on that area and a million other inconsistencies that day! the conspiracy hypothesis just makes sense! i dont know HOW they did it but i dont beleive a few guys from a cave made NORAD stand down! and why the august 6 memo was blatently ignored!! the list goes on! please explain
Was the building in Madrid built with the same structure as WTC7? Was the building in Madrid damaged from a sky scraper falling into it? Were the fires located in the same areas? Was the building left to burn like WTC7 was?
The two scenarios aren't even close to the same. The Madrid building could have easily collapsed too if the fires were on lower floors.
What you're saying is something like: Well they said the Titanic was unsinkable so I don't understand why it sank!
there was molten metal pooling of the madrid building approximately in the middle! the steel beams were sagging the next day when it was under control and still didnt lose its integrity!! and plus the north tower didnt fall on tower 7 it simply rained some debris over one face of the building! back to the original question! random fires! dead straight collapse!!! 8 hours isnt even going to reach the temps needed to melt steel!!! only fueled by office equipment!! i still dont buy your theory!
You seem to have contradicted yourself. You are questioning how "molten metal pooling" was found in the wreckage of 9/11 but yet you point out it was found in the fire of the Madrid Building?
"and plus the north tower didnt fall on tower 7"
Wrong again. Look at the videos of the tower falling into building 7.'
You clearly underestimate the damage it caused because you're just brushing that off to the side.
As for the "random fires" well, you should tell the NYFD that, because they could not contain the fires, which were by NO MEANS random little fires that happend to burn for 7 hours.
Who says the steel had to melt to fail? That's another typical twoofer argument, usually coming from someone who has no idea how heat effects steel.
Building equipment and office materials make a pretty damn big fire, again you have no concept of reality.
if you are really an engineer you would have something in your favourites related to your job and passion! you arent an engineer by the looks and sound of it and you faved rob lazar ufo propulsion stuff then cant beleive 911 was an inside job!! your a fraud i reckon!!!!
"i dont know HOW they did it but i dont beleive a few guys from a cave made NORAD stand down"
That's exactly your drive. The reality of what happened just isn't exciting enough for you and the twoofers, so you formulate a big story that is exciting, and then claim truth to it!
You don't find the "truth" by deciding that 9/11 was an inside job, and then working your way backwards from that claim to try and prove it, you are all ass backwards.
it was tall but not that tall. i just remember that alot of people wanted to be the ones to blow up the building and alot of them payed $20 bucks for a ticket that they were gonna put in this thing and then someone was gonna choose out of it. and its kinda funny that a little kid won so yeah he got to blow up this building but they blew it up cuz they were gonna use that area to build something else there. i would know cuz i live here in fort worth
jezus i dont get this y the hell r u all so fuckin into it it happend u cant turn the time back... Get a life you might be all wrong i dont give a fuck and quit fucking botherin me will 'ya
and and and and... first learn to type in FULL sentences. You know, Subject, Verb, Object. it helps make you look like you may have something to say rather than like a 14 year old who is texting.
second I wish I spoke idiot, then I could translate for other people.
Like all truthers, you get your ass handed to you and run away like a little bitch.
2. the "explosions" in the basement have been shown to have been elevators falling from the collapse.
3. There are dozens of videos you can look at.. even loose change. start the collapse of each when it starts and time them until they finish. North tower at 10 seconds is still 40 stories above the ground (higher than the mariot hotel). 15 seconds for collapse. 20 seconds for the south tower. take out a stopwatch and time it. I have.
If you actually payed close attention to WTC1 and WTC2's collapses, you'll see the debris from the towers EXCEEDS the actual collapse of the towers. Therefore, saying the towers collapsed at free-fall speed is null and void. Watch vids of the collapsing towers and count for yourself. If you can count, you should get MORE than 9 secs. I even counted the collapse of the North Tower twice and the result was more than 9 secs both times (it was around 20 to be more precise)
So by your logic, buildings have not and cannot collapse from fire? Did you ever learn in chemistry that metal conducts heat? Guess not. Steel is a metal, if metal conducts heat, at a point, it will sag and weaken. Once this occurs, it's all downhill from there with the building's demise. The towers had no concrete, which would've kept it up and instead were completely exposed to the fire.
I support your theory but the WTC's core columns did have concrete but once any of the metal was exposed the columns heated up warped and broke more concrete and fireproofing only making it worse.
I has happened before. May 10, 1993 the Kader Toy Factory collapsed from fire, January 16, 1967 the McCormick Place in Chicago collapsed because of fire, and in January of 1997 the Sight and Sound theater in Lancaster County, PA collapsed because of fire. All steel framed buildings.
That is not a true statement. There have been several buidlings which collpased from fire alone in the past. Teh decatur toy factory, the top of the madrid building.
And the buildings which remained standing weren't hit buy a 757/767 doing 500 MPH.
hey why did floors in wtc 5 and 6 (which were just under fire) fail and sag? There were repeated floors in both buildings in which the steel weakend and failed. was it from thermite? CD for them too? Or just fire caused?
9/11 was an inside job. Pay attention and wake up. You're not a bunch of sheep. Stop letting yourselves be manipulated like you are. The media lies. They'll tell you something is red when it's obviously blue. Think for yourself. FTNWO
this would be cool if this wasnt planned and u saw some1 die You: *whistles while typing on computer* *boom boom boom boom boom boom boom* You: "WHAT THE!!!" Your Buddy: "AHHHHHHHHHHH" *smoke appears* You: *cough cough* "Woooooaaaah it's tipping!" *building collapses and tips sideways* You: "OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!" *crash shatter boom boom smash crack snap boom* You: *Dead* civillians: ........
I was at school...
numantunak 2 months ago
DFW REPRESENT!
kjettpack 2 months ago
9/11
mohammad0988 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch The "FORT WORTH GO FED MICPASS" Music Video Now! 18 Hip Hop Artist 1 song & Video Reppin FORT WORTH TEXAS! Feat Vahid, Cas Iron, Trap Squad Cartel, Souhern kappin Soldiers, Kilo Artifact, Riot Squad South, Paperchase records, M.R. Dubb, Otg's AND MANY MORE!! FREE TWISTED BLACK ALL DAY!!
vahid817 9 months ago
a sky crapper implosion
LiviuJETIX 1 year ago
0:35
"here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes here it goes"
dillonrockband 1 year ago
It ain't going..... Woah !!!
MUDSWAT 1 year ago
CNB Building?
luggo 1 year ago
Thumbs up If you agree planes work better...
dadnapt24 1 year ago
@dadnapt24 in conjunction with bombs there of yes
MRhydrogen100 6 months ago
The building almost just fades away at the end.
jkilts 1 year ago
this vid has been qlready shot but at another angle
grumpyme1234 1 year ago
they sure gotta contract good pyrotechnics to do that...
necrOothic 1 year ago
Comment removed
compukenny 1 year ago
@compukenny You're an idiot.
Exmech2 1 year ago
Comment removed
InnocenceExperience 1 year ago
@compukenny And you're the dumbest motherfucker here.
RenegadeArms09 1 year ago
Look up Building Implosion on straightdope (.)com
That's why your video is suddenly so popular!
tiyenin 1 year ago
looked for a second it might lean over to fall
JahaysusKahrist 1 year ago
Looks Lyk WTC..
BigySmalls16 1 year ago
looks like what happened a WTC
rudly 1 year ago
Look risky, glad it was successful!!!
dingdongditch1000 1 year ago
amazing the way it fell, must have had small fires and some minor damage to have fell exactly like WTC7. The demolition company must be saving hundreds of thousands dropping a building using the WTC7 technique.
tedmaulz 1 year ago
@tedmaulz Yeah, government officials when planning it all must have realized the trajectory of falling debris from the towers would only gouge out a portion of WTC 7, therefore explaining their cover-up of how it fell! Don't be so dumb!
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
Now that was a work of art.
stfanboy 1 year ago
it's like yesterday to me. I am of nyc. these attacks were 8.5 years ago and still nobody has closure. it's like a deep cut wound festering. i've done numerous demolitions, mapped, surveyed all over nyc and the region. i tire of people avoiding the obvious. that day shows how much bullshit will float after such a evil crime was committed on such a scale. i saw cut beams, nobody cutting it before we got it out! that means people put it there, it was planned and could have been been stopped. mercy
nycmapper 1 year ago
we are expendable. When I was there with my instrument set on my tripod at the wtc site, I saw cut beams, dozens in a row all along the base of the buildings. They were made visible after debris was removed. I helped with that removal. all the bent metal got tossed on a barge to be melted. The cut beams are still stored in hanger 17 in JFK airport. What got me motivated to speak was a person saying the attacks were 11 years ago. People are forgetting, trying to let go because it's too much.
nycmapper 1 year ago
9/11 was the biggest movie set. i worked alongside Port Authority surpervisors as a land surveyor for the Central Survey Group. I worked at all of the facilities. Nobody was cutting until needed. I was there. the beams can be seen cut with a specific bead that only a thermite reaction could have left. Free fall? who can't see that without imagination centered on fact. cut beam, nobody there I knew was cutting unless getting it out for removal. no sir, they were cut on purpose.
nycmapper 1 year ago
i was at the Texas stadium implosion today....this was weak
Emoidiot187 1 year ago
WTC 7? Sorry my mistake, you know all these demolitions look alike.
stapledshut0908 1 year ago
You know it's interesting.
I know the building wasn't new, but for some reason I tend to think anything built fro m the post WW II era to the present day is new. Therefore it's interesting when buildings that are not built prior to that period get imploded.
MIKECNW 1 year ago
@MIKECNW i agree, i'm wondering why all these "newish" buildings are being imploded. seems like a waste...
Protains 1 year ago
@Protains hehe, that building was pretty dang old.
ap0calypt1ca 1 year ago
Why are you guys talking about 9/11? it wasent a inside job,if you had common sence you would know that, and whay are we still aguing about a thing that happend 11 years ago. lets just enjoy this vid and how the thinks its the coolist thing ever
tampabaybucs7 1 year ago
i ment to put guy bewen the and thinks
tampabaybucs7 1 year ago
@tampabaybucs7 It was an inside job. It was 8.5 tears ago. Steel beams were sliced with demolition material more powerful then those used for this demolition shown. Common sense tells me to question anybody that hides from difficult questions. I could not hide when asked to goto the site to perform volumetrics and tell them how many trucks to use to take out the debris. I saw steel beams sliced as if by light sabers. That's thermite demolition, which takes planning. Do you know how?
nycmapper 1 year ago
@nycmapper Did you ever stop to think that the beams could have been sliced by the iron workers on site?
If they were cut while the building was still intact, how come they were out in the open and clean? Answer: they were cut by iron workers to reduce the size of individual debris ready to be removed.
G1NZOU 1 year ago
@tampabaybucs7 are you telling us to forget 9/11?
NJHater 1 year ago
at lest they got the people out before they pooled it
raffi7900 1 year ago
This was definitely an inside job, somebody tell Ron Paul.
bw01a 1 year ago
That is one hell of a beer belly that dude has.
pbsucksdonkeycock 1 year ago
Forth Worth is an inside job
chiflee67 1 year ago 43
@chiflee67 LOL!!
anikinippon 1 year ago
@chiflee67 No it wasn't I saw a few arabs armed toe nail clippers drive a scooter into the side of it! Let's all go to war!!!
icemanisdangerous 1 year ago 20
@chiflee67 hilarious
HullScott7 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
7 WTC:
Wasn't hit by a plane.
Fell in 6.6 seconds.
Had witnesses describe sounds of explosions.
NIST's computer model took years to come up with "thermal expansion" causing the collapse, but if the steel was hot enough for "thermal expansion" then the steel would sag: therefore thermal expansion is the least likely cause of the collapse.
uncledevo 2 years ago
The 'sounds of explosions' were floors collapsing in on themselves.
When a building is hit by a massive slab of concrete (on fire no less), it's going to cause some structural damage.
CapitalistOverlord 1 year ago
nooooooo
juanpa44303 2 years ago
Those of us who see and do not speak have blood on our hands as well.
jezzabellyray 2 years ago
If WTC 2 debris caused WTC 7 to fall, why are these people so close to this building?
BrickUnit 2 years ago
@BrickUnit
This building is not as tall as World trade Center plus they probally did get everyone out of the other buildings right next to the collasping one in this video for the safety reason you just stated (Debris)
SPS148669 2 years ago
It didn't. That simple.
aSASa45454 2 years ago
@aSASa45454 hahaha i know right, because buildings always fall when they are on fire at the rate of gravity
BrickUnit 2 years ago
Well duh, thats common sense :P
aSASa45454 2 years ago
@aSASa45454 at the end of the day that doesnt really matter, the fact that they found explosive residue at the WTC site fucks everything in the 9/11 commission report
BrickUnit 2 years ago
Sure does. I agree 100%. Really what says the most is WTC 7. It's just flat out NOT POSSIBLE.
aSASa45454 2 years ago
shutup faggot
eastcoastriots 2 years ago
@eastcoastriots 9/11 was an inside job
BrickUnit 2 years ago
duh!
eastcoastriots 2 years ago
@eastcoastriots take it easy, i was just making sure, a lot of americans are living under a rock or in denial
BrickUnit 2 years ago
imploded like 3 building on 9/11 were
KuriVaiM 2 years ago
no haha chuck norris was standing in front of the building and farted next to someone who was smoking a cigarette:P
xXducksayXx 2 years ago
i remember watching that shit happen. coolest damn thing ever.
i wasnt that close to the building but it was just as badass XD
xXducksayXx 2 years ago
well ill be damned
PeelZone 2 years ago
Chuck Norris was inspecting this demolition himself.....from the inside of the building.
lago4 2 years ago
"This is perhaps the coolest thing I've ever seen."
Hahaha.
HandBproductions 2 years ago
You might think its easy, but in the Big City... You might wanna be careful and be sure it won't topple on another building!
bubbawhale 2 years ago
In 1945 a B25 bomber crashed into the empire state building because of bad visibility (forcing him to fly under the clouds). the fire killed 14 office workers, burned for 7 hours and it still stood
WTC towers burned for 1 hour and went down near freefall speed.
please America, stop lying to yourself. 3000 man and women were killed so America had a reason to invade a country that had black gold under it's soil.
whatsupwiththat6 2 years ago 2
a B25 bomber is a much smaller aircraft, and unlike the massive planes that struck the WTC, it was not completely full of jet fuel.
the B25 also struck the empire state building on a much higher floor, meaning less weight was being supported by the damaged section.
also, buildings in earlier eras were extremely heavy, and had exterior frames rather than more efficient central core building plans
the WTC did very well considering a humongous, fully fueled aircraft destroyed its supports.
LWagner4 2 years ago
Wrong, the WTC used the Tube in a tube design, and was one of the worlds strongest buildings ever made.
The planes destroyed just 13% of the the exterior columns, and at most, 2% of the core columns.
The jet fuel burned off in under 10 minutes, meaning the remaining burning was just office supplies.
aSASa45454 2 years ago 2
and how hot does jet fuel burn? how hot was required to melt that grade of steel in the tradecenters? wake up, i have alot more facts if you are interested. you could watch loose change, alot of good information for you there. you really look like a paid fed troll right now
chevelle3429 2 years ago
Uhh, 2000F.
aSASa45454 2 years ago
america invaded america!
1yoyo105 2 years ago
You're so right!
gambler6 2 years ago
Molten Iron FLOWING LIKE LAVA. NIST Denial
DjfreeO 2 years ago
people.
pay attn to what is happening here.
you guys are arguing , hurling insults at one another about an unknown neither of you yet comprehend. yes the towers were destroyed, yes tower 7 was detonated, not damaged, yes they only paid 900,000 dollars for a 900,000,000 return on insurence and used it to make new and efficient towers, yes it was not alquade, and anyway alquada works for the CIA still,
kabam699 2 years ago
no it just reflects that engineering isnt something your are really interested in which beckons the question! ARE YOU REALLY AN ENGINEER??! your not obviously! just a man that has a boat that blows heaps of smoke on startup! yeah real good engineer! i think the valves need setting!! all you can do is throw insults now showing your true mental age!!! where your credentials! fraud boy??!!!! which university did you go to and how long where you there?? rob lazar??! hes a nut job!!!!!!!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
still dont buy it!!!!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
you are retarded to think all the shit that happened that day was a coincidence!! so keep on beleiving the bullshit the media pushes and go get yourself vaccinated!!!! sucker
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
What building were you in when you filmed this? (I'm from Fort Worth so I'll know the name)
debrajl529 2 years ago
Then why didn't the high rise in madrid fall down? it burned for over 24 hours. it was warped, but did not fall! And if it would have, it would have fell over, not in it's own footprint!
laywinder 2 years ago
WTC 7 was a much better controlled demolition! the tower 7 fell straight down in its own footprint at free fall speed!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
Yeah, and it was dead silent too, I wonder how they did that??
fengineer08 2 years ago
thermite!!!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
Thermite doesn't do the job. It only cuts vertically, and it takes 2 pounds of thermite to cut 1 pound of steel.
Do the math, and then tell me how it is possible to sneak in that much thermite into 1 building without detection.
fengineer08 2 years ago
so you are saying steel frame structure built to that standard can burn for 8 hours approx then collapse perfectly at almost freefall speed! gee let me do the math! hey there is no need for demolition crews anymore! just light ramdom fires and building will fall down in a straight line! yay! either that or every building in NY is built way below the fire standard! this is the first time this has ever happened and i dare say it will be the last!!! many steel frame buildings burn! none do this
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
Yes absolutely, fire will destroy a building if you don't stop it, that's why they have fire protection systems and fire protection on structural steel.
And yes, you can bet they will fall down in a straight line, because that's the direction of gravity.
Please get over yourself and stop pretending like you know what you're talking about, unless you show me you're "math."
B.S. Engineering
10+ Years metal fab experience
P.E.
fengineer08 2 years ago
whatever! randomly placed fires dont cause perfectly straight collapse! ! so you arent a structural engineer! coz i have heard many angineers with alot more experience than you on the topic of wtc7 so get a second opinion! i beleive them not you! the building would have tipped at least slightly towards the more effected areas! please explain!!!! architects and engineers for 911 truth was set up because of this event! WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! PERIOD
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
Hahaha. Oh that's cute. You don't even know what engineering is. Please stick to your lego set.
fengineer08 2 years ago
whatever!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
You know what? I confess, I am an engineer for the government and was part of planning the 9/11 Lie.
fengineer08 2 years ago
haha! very funny! look i dont want 911 to be an inside job job i just cant understand why the building in madrid would burn so long and not fall! why there is no footage of pentagon impact even though there are 86 cameras on that area and a million other inconsistencies that day! the conspiracy hypothesis just makes sense! i dont know HOW they did it but i dont beleive a few guys from a cave made NORAD stand down! and why the august 6 memo was blatently ignored!! the list goes on! please explain
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
Was the building in Madrid built with the same structure as WTC7? Was the building in Madrid damaged from a sky scraper falling into it? Were the fires located in the same areas? Was the building left to burn like WTC7 was?
The two scenarios aren't even close to the same. The Madrid building could have easily collapsed too if the fires were on lower floors.
What you're saying is something like: Well they said the Titanic was unsinkable so I don't understand why it sank!
fengineer08 2 years ago
there was molten metal pooling of the madrid building approximately in the middle! the steel beams were sagging the next day when it was under control and still didnt lose its integrity!! and plus the north tower didnt fall on tower 7 it simply rained some debris over one face of the building! back to the original question! random fires! dead straight collapse!!! 8 hours isnt even going to reach the temps needed to melt steel!!! only fueled by office equipment!! i still dont buy your theory!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
You seem to have contradicted yourself. You are questioning how "molten metal pooling" was found in the wreckage of 9/11 but yet you point out it was found in the fire of the Madrid Building?
"and plus the north tower didnt fall on tower 7"
Wrong again. Look at the videos of the tower falling into building 7.'
You clearly underestimate the damage it caused because you're just brushing that off to the side.
fengineer08 2 years ago
bullshit! if it fell on wtc7 so significantly why were the penthouses visibly undamaged by enlarge when the tower fell! still dont buy it!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
As for the "random fires" well, you should tell the NYFD that, because they could not contain the fires, which were by NO MEANS random little fires that happend to burn for 7 hours.
Who says the steel had to melt to fail? That's another typical twoofer argument, usually coming from someone who has no idea how heat effects steel.
Building equipment and office materials make a pretty damn big fire, again you have no concept of reality.
fengineer08 2 years ago
if you are really an engineer you would have something in your favourites related to your job and passion! you arent an engineer by the looks and sound of it and you faved rob lazar ufo propulsion stuff then cant beleive 911 was an inside job!! your a fraud i reckon!!!!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
OMG what are you in fucking middle school??
Yeah, since I don't have engineering relaited videos in my favorites (because i really give a shit what that reflects), I must not be a real engineer.
Do you realize how pathetically obsessed you are with living on the internet?? Why don't you try going outside and experience reality for a change?
Go ahead, don't "buy it"because you've already made up your mind no matter how wrong or ignorant you are. Typical nut job you are...
fengineer08 2 years ago
"i dont know HOW they did it but i dont beleive a few guys from a cave made NORAD stand down"
That's exactly your drive. The reality of what happened just isn't exciting enough for you and the twoofers, so you formulate a big story that is exciting, and then claim truth to it!
You don't find the "truth" by deciding that 9/11 was an inside job, and then working your way backwards from that claim to try and prove it, you are all ass backwards.
fengineer08 2 years ago
How is it in Fort Worth? Is there a drought over there like in Austin? I'm sure they're putting water restriction in Fort Worth.
InfiniteEndurance 2 years ago
All Texas needs is water and a few gfood people....the same can be said for hell.
cornskid 2 years ago
No, There has been plenty of rain in Fort Worth this year, and now Austin has had quite a bit as well.
perfectjazz78 2 years ago
its was loud that day i was in the butler housing pj's when that happen.
stopsixtexasboy 2 years ago
wow...........looks alot like just how the twin towers fell in new york, hmmmm, makes ya think dont nit
mattiebastard 2 years ago
awesome video...great job keeping the camera steady.
odmcarp 2 years ago
I was just a mile away and missed it :(
Thanks neighbor, because of you I got a great view of it anyway!
6Nicad6emus6 2 years ago
It starts at 0:34
Jesusdragon737 2 years ago
Comment removed
jelinto 2 years ago
no, you were dead
Eragondaparagon 2 years ago
Some people never learn.
BTW, if other video sources match this, I believe that's the Landmark in Texas being imploded. I don't know about the parking garage theory.
CycloneGU 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Crazy
My guess is that TWO planes flew into that building... probably from opposing sides.
Def. a cool terrorist attack right there. Damn muslins
24BIT24BIT 2 years ago
yep, hahaha
jonnykiller 2 years ago
lol the guy in the background
hes all like " DUDE!"
haha
shinmuerte 2 years ago
I heard that spot where that building was got turned into a parking garage.
growingup15 2 years ago
lol and then you see some crazy fat office lady run past "THEY"RE BACK!! FUUUUUCCCKK!!"
couchsloth69 2 years ago
how tall was that building
24pepperhi 2 years ago
it was tall but not that tall. i just remember that alot of people wanted to be the ones to blow up the building and alot of them payed $20 bucks for a ticket that they were gonna put in this thing and then someone was gonna choose out of it. and its kinda funny that a little kid won so yeah he got to blow up this building but they blew it up cuz they were gonna use that area to build something else there. i would know cuz i live here in fort worth
Metallicfan 2 years ago
the "little kid" was 14 and his dad won. they donated it to there scout troop and the troop got to imploded it. douch bag
awesomeness817 2 years ago
Perhaps, just perhaps!
kellythesinger 2 years ago
if it would of fell slower it would of tipped over and that would be bad
bubbleboy97 2 years ago
holy coww!
Igloo53 2 years ago
Dayum terrorists dey in ma city.
Mobroz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow man! where there people in that?
pkingkingbag 2 years ago
Yes, and these people happened to all be standing by the window calmly filming it.
xC3110x 2 years ago
what did he say
24pepperhi 2 years ago
He was asking if there were people in the building. (click reply next to their name and discard, if you want to see what a down-rated comment said)
xC3110x 2 years ago
jezus i dont get this y the hell r u all so fuckin into it it happend u cant turn the time back... Get a life you might be all wrong i dont give a fuck and quit fucking botherin me will 'ya
redline1233 2 years ago
I'm just replying to your asanine posts and calling you on your terrorist apologist views.
I'm calling you on your horrendous writing and your in ability to form a thought.
why did you go and delete all of your previous STUPID comments?
adorabilly1 2 years ago
like idc i saw a movie an i got in tha mood postin fuckd up posts... so y tha fuck u keep botherin me??
redline1233 2 years ago
you rlly need to get a fuckin life ;)
redline1233 2 years ago
u rly need to learn to form a simple sentence.
You also need to actually try to go to school and learn something.
y tha fuck u keep botherin me? Maybe because you are an illiterate twat who posts BS on pages with no support and then you insult people.
So go back to school and 1. learn how to write. 2. learn how to do research. 3. Learn something called the scientific method.
adorabilly1 2 years ago
Comment removed
redline1233 2 years ago
and and and and... first learn to type in FULL sentences. You know, Subject, Verb, Object. it helps make you look like you may have something to say rather than like a 14 year old who is texting.
second I wish I spoke idiot, then I could translate for other people.
Like all truthers, you get your ass handed to you and run away like a little bitch.
Keep on running.
adorabilly 2 years ago
So that's how it happened...
dazedanddazed 3 years ago
the sound of the building imploding was so cool. 5 stars
hops152688 3 years ago
implosion is analagous to apoptosis and explosion is analagous to necrosis
Slashtap3 3 years ago
lol 0:51 HOLY COW^^
HansTheBoss 3 years ago
kinda what the twin towers looked like when they fell eh?
machiavelli15 3 years ago
Ah... another truther. It LOOKED NOTHING like the twin towers falling.
1. NO explosions could be heard on ANY video of 9/11
2. No explosions are visible ANYWHERE on the towers prior to the collapse.
3. No flashes of light from explosives on ANY floors.
4. The towers core held up for a few seconds afte the collapse.
5. The towers took longer than freefall speed to hit the ground 15 sec, and 20 sec each.
so besides for being COMPLETELY different, they are EXACTLY the same thing.
adorabilly1 3 years ago
Comment removed
redline1233 3 years ago
1. The collapse starts at the TOP. Not the bottom
2. the "explosions" in the basement have been shown to have been elevators falling from the collapse.
3. There are dozens of videos you can look at.. even loose change. start the collapse of each when it starts and time them until they finish. North tower at 10 seconds is still 40 stories above the ground (higher than the mariot hotel). 15 seconds for collapse. 20 seconds for the south tower. take out a stopwatch and time it. I have.
adorabilly1 3 years ago
I also timed the collapse, adorability1. These truthers ignore the fact that the debris is free-falling and the tower isn't.
BellyLover06 3 years ago
If you actually payed close attention to WTC1 and WTC2's collapses, you'll see the debris from the towers EXCEEDS the actual collapse of the towers. Therefore, saying the towers collapsed at free-fall speed is null and void. Watch vids of the collapsing towers and count for yourself. If you can count, you should get MORE than 9 secs. I even counted the collapse of the North Tower twice and the result was more than 9 secs both times (it was around 20 to be more precise)
BellyLover06 3 years ago
Comment removed
redline1233 3 years ago
So by your logic, buildings have not and cannot collapse from fire? Did you ever learn in chemistry that metal conducts heat? Guess not. Steel is a metal, if metal conducts heat, at a point, it will sag and weaken. Once this occurs, it's all downhill from there with the building's demise. The towers had no concrete, which would've kept it up and instead were completely exposed to the fire.
BellyLover06 3 years ago
I support your theory but the WTC's core columns did have concrete but once any of the metal was exposed the columns heated up warped and broke more concrete and fireproofing only making it worse.
newdad1107 3 years ago
I has happened before. May 10, 1993 the Kader Toy Factory collapsed from fire, January 16, 1967 the McCormick Place in Chicago collapsed because of fire, and in January of 1997 the Sight and Sound theater in Lancaster County, PA collapsed because of fire. All steel framed buildings.
newdad1107 3 years ago
That is not a true statement. There have been several buidlings which collpased from fire alone in the past. Teh decatur toy factory, the top of the madrid building.
And the buildings which remained standing weren't hit buy a 757/767 doing 500 MPH.
hey why did floors in wtc 5 and 6 (which were just under fire) fail and sag? There were repeated floors in both buildings in which the steel weakend and failed. was it from thermite? CD for them too? Or just fire caused?
adorabilly 3 years ago
and stop changing the subject. You were just shown the collapse took longer than freefall.
Will you admit that all the collapses took longer than freefall?
Go ahead and say it. the collapses took longer than freefall.
Then we can move on to other subjects
adorabilly1 3 years ago
yes, yes it does.
dazedanddazed 3 years ago
can you say ftw?
CaptainAwesome96 3 years ago
actually, explosions were visible, but dumb people like you make up theories to debunk all the flashes and explosions heard by people
machiavelli15 3 years ago 2
oh yeah
lucarex50 3 years ago
no.....the coolest thing would be to see it fall on your head...
goonerash 3 years ago
Now THAT is entertainment!
KazzRacer 3 years ago
9/11 was an inside job. Pay attention and wake up. You're not a bunch of sheep. Stop letting yourselves be manipulated like you are. The media lies. They'll tell you something is red when it's obviously blue. Think for yourself. FTNWO
Peace
testchimp23 3 years ago
lol how was 9/11 an inside job...
Kamahl47 3 years ago
What a moron... I bet you believe that the moon landing was a hoax too...
Frosttty 3 years ago
Frosttty
Most of them, do believe that.
mgsfan15 3 years ago
hahahahahahaha good one
What you said:What a moron... I bet you believe that the moon landing was a hoax too...
Video:Successful building implosion in Fort Worth
fsxpilot123456 3 years ago
Go suck Al Gore's and Obama's Dicks.
I'd like you to tell that to someone who lost someone on that day and see them punch you square in the face.
94gtvert 3 years ago
that is cool :)
burstinatrix1 3 years ago
wrong point of view, behind the glass ... bad record, and sound ..
lemaquinista 3 years ago
that was cool... perhaps?
SuperLegit 3 years ago
cool view!Thanks for showing it!
tinycollegegirl 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"holy cow"
"dude taht was perhaps the coolest thing i've ever seen, perhaps"
bunch of loser american dickheads
dagibbons 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
looked nothing like the world trade center
porkypine8974 3 years ago
umm did you want it to look like that? I'd hope not.
SanAndreas6guy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Looked just like the World Trade Buildings.
RayAir1 3 years ago
The show is over! Go back to work, hurry up!
dibiaxxx 3 years ago
yes and texas rules
lostXmilk 3 years ago
texas is no better than any other state you arrogant douchebag.
feederfooder 3 years ago
no, texas is better htan all other states
libby123123 3 years ago 3
Damn straight!
I put a video of an implosion in Midland on my youtube.
94gtvert 3 years ago
Is this in Texas?
shiningstars109 3 years ago
Yes Fort Worth
tinycollegegirl 3 years ago
Hey, Did Larry Silverstein buy this building too!
LockNLoadRonPaul2008 3 years ago 2
I live in Fort WOrth and I cant believe I missed it.
sludemage 3 years ago 2