@themrdorn His approach may be somewhat crude, but I note that you bring nothing to the conversation either. Perhaps you have some proof that overturns all the works of every geologist for the past 200 years? If so, kindly present it, or at least try to justify your thought processes in this area.
@bigboy45454545 Funny that you should think this. Actually from the statistics that i have read more and more people are realizing that evolution in its final outcome of species changing to species is ridiculous. In other words the percentage of people who doubt evo are growing. And in fact there are many scientist who agree as you can find a list of at least 700 to date that have signed. Your faith is the one thats blind.
There is no evidence of a universal flood. But there's tons of evidence that many Muslims, Jews, and Christians are busting brain stems, trying to make their bronze-age mythology seem as if it's not... mythology. This could lead to acute cognitive dissonance and profound mental flatulence... as so exhibited.
@MacLeamh The best thing to do is to not start with the flood you have the start with basic reliabilty of the bible and archealogical facts. Or if your up for it start with the evidences for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Unless you have had a real debate over that or actually looked at evidences do not down play them.
@MacLeamh erm...theres a lot of evidence of rising sea levels at the end of the last ice age...hence the reason why EVERY culture has a deluge myth...not just jews christians and muslims.
Further there are many archological excavation arround Mount Ararat : Jericho, Chatal Huyuk, Gobekli Tepe, Susa, Eridu, Ugarit, Baalbek dated 11.000 years. Afterwardas about 7500 yr ago thare has been another mini Deluge and flowered all over the word chinise, Indu, Toltech, Moche, Sumer, Egyptian civilisation same time arround 5.200 years ago!!! Kiss
Read Kathleen Kenyon- Digging up Jericho- ed. 1959- Kiss
We were paiting caverns (Lascaux, Chauvet, Altamira) and carving avory venus (Willendonrf, Hohlefels) since 35.000 year ago. Underwater Megalithic sites indicate that also megalihtic Sacsahuaman - Machu Pichu (Peru), Puma Punku and TIWANACU (Bolivia), GIZA (Egypt) are antediluvian. Geologists (Niagara Falls, Panama 17 mtrs difference between Atl and Pac. oceans) extintion of mamuth and swardtigers confirm. What should we did during lacking 20.000 till 12.000 yr ago?? Kiss
This man does make an interesting point, but he leaves off the fact that the many great civilizations he is talking about that supposedly have cities underwater were supposed to have reined in times AFTER the flood of the bible. The cities would have been built after the flood. He also leaves off the possibility that the "cities" are actually natural underwater rock formations which is far more likely a possibility. Very interesting thoughts though.
@wannabeebee End-of-time 1 Obama victory made media's headlines 2 Same day disaster struck him for ever 3 IL. Lottery drew 666 4 Front page headlines shared with 666 destroyed him "Obama Wins White House - Lottery draws 666" 5 So Illinois' people saw Obama was the Antichrist 6 The Bible says "The Antichrist suffers fatal head-wound" 7 Lotto's Obama's fatal head-wound "killing" him 8 Reveal this everywhere, to everyone of the whole world 9 666 Beast-Mark's money
Carbon dating is a good tool when used properly. However evolutionists use it as a one size fits all miracle tool that has almost no limitations. Calibration of carbon dates with known historical records limits it to less than 5,000 years. Rates of organic decay in different mediums, air, sea water, fresh water, ice or different soils are all limiting factors that are not given enough weight when using carbon dating. Once an event is dated it is held too dogmatically.
Traditional history is a joke. The western world is the dominante power on earth and our dominate religion started a tradition of suppressing any knowledge that did not agree with their dogma. It is the duty of all of us who are inlightened to spread the word, that much of history and science is BS.
Water leaches carbon. So if you use the C-14 method to date stuff that has been under water, whatever age you derive, is WAY TOO EARLY. So last Ice Age is 10000 BC? Doubt it.
Science is full of unadmitted gaffes: that's my complaint. For example, the Lascaux cave paintings were dated by MEDIA USED: lol of COURSE ochre & charcoal can be 30,000 years old, but the art STYLE is Mycanaean, which of course is far LATER in time. :)
Then again, we Christians misread Genesis as six-day creation, when Bible says it's six-day RESTORATION. I did my "brainouty" videos showing Hebrew Bible on that. So not only science is wrong. Seems both sides in the debate need to go back to the drawing board and do more homework. :)
Nice bit. The Noachian Flood caused the supposed ice age, that is true. Global warming is also true, since the Earth is slowly returning to toward, not to, it's prior warmer state. The amazingly increased number of floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, and tornadoes, famines, all this are the long term result of the Noachian Flood!
From Genesis 2:7 onward, the book will focus primarily on that family of Agriculturists and "her seed", and NOT the sixth day creation.
Gen 6:2 "And seeing are sons of the Elohim the daughters of HA ADAM..." = the human. The sixth day creation has nothing to do with this.
"the face of the whole earth" (Gen 8:9) is used of a local plague (Exo 10:15)
PrinceWalter 3 months ago
bigboy45454545 1 Hey Crea-tard? You should check the dates of some of the oldest civilizations on Earth?
Cram your Noah fairytale flood story up your ass.
Then cram your ass with walnuts ugly.
Magic sky daddies, and "all" religions are false.
This is the response from an one who believes in reason? Doesn't sound like a very intelligent response to me. More like a school yard bully.
themrdorn 11 months ago
@themrdorn His approach may be somewhat crude, but I note that you bring nothing to the conversation either. Perhaps you have some proof that overturns all the works of every geologist for the past 200 years? If so, kindly present it, or at least try to justify your thought processes in this area.
NorthForkFisherman 5 months ago
Big blocks don't make a civilization, it is just some rocks, never proven. The Ice Age is proven, so is evolution.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
blijft eng dit soort gasten. waar baseerd hij zijn gezwets op?
wildwilco 1 year ago
blijft eng dit soort gasten
wildwilco 1 year ago
Has this guy ever heard of the theory of Atlantis.
N00bcrunch3r 1 year ago
Hey Crea-tard? You should check the dates of some of the oldest civilizations on earth?
China, India, and South American civilizations, go back tens of thousands of years.
Cram your Noah fairytale flood story up your ass.
Then cram your ass with walnuts ugly.
Magic sky daddies, and "all" religions are false.
The age of religion is coming to an end, in favor of the "age of science and reason'
Run out and get a job selling used cars, cause we're not buying what you're selling here.
bigboy45454545 1 year ago
@bigboy45454545 Funny that you should think this. Actually from the statistics that i have read more and more people are realizing that evolution in its final outcome of species changing to species is ridiculous. In other words the percentage of people who doubt evo are growing. And in fact there are many scientist who agree as you can find a list of at least 700 to date that have signed. Your faith is the one thats blind.
TheJflow008 1 year ago
There is no evidence of a universal flood. But there's tons of evidence that many Muslims, Jews, and Christians are busting brain stems, trying to make their bronze-age mythology seem as if it's not... mythology. This could lead to acute cognitive dissonance and profound mental flatulence... as so exhibited.
MacLeamh 1 year ago
@MacLeamh The best thing to do is to not start with the flood you have the start with basic reliabilty of the bible and archealogical facts. Or if your up for it start with the evidences for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Unless you have had a real debate over that or actually looked at evidences do not down play them.
skinlesscougar 1 year ago
@MacLeamh erm...theres a lot of evidence of rising sea levels at the end of the last ice age...hence the reason why EVERY culture has a deluge myth...not just jews christians and muslims.
EnkiMelekTaus 1 year ago
@MacLeamh
So these underwater structures are either mythological, or were built intentionally underwater for unknown reasons?
rilo154 1 year ago
so let me guess . . . it all end in "so god dun it!"
keggerous 1 year ago
The big question has got to be.. Why are they so intent on lying to us about the when and the where of our more ancient beginnings?
AmericaFell 2 years ago
Further there are many archological excavation arround Mount Ararat : Jericho, Chatal Huyuk, Gobekli Tepe, Susa, Eridu, Ugarit, Baalbek dated 11.000 years. Afterwardas about 7500 yr ago thare has been another mini Deluge and flowered all over the word chinise, Indu, Toltech, Moche, Sumer, Egyptian civilisation same time arround 5.200 years ago!!! Kiss
Read Kathleen Kenyon- Digging up Jericho- ed. 1959- Kiss
MsArgentana 2 years ago
We were paiting caverns (Lascaux, Chauvet, Altamira) and carving avory venus (Willendonrf, Hohlefels) since 35.000 year ago. Underwater Megalithic sites indicate that also megalihtic Sacsahuaman - Machu Pichu (Peru), Puma Punku and TIWANACU (Bolivia), GIZA (Egypt) are antediluvian. Geologists (Niagara Falls, Panama 17 mtrs difference between Atl and Pac. oceans) extintion of mamuth and swardtigers confirm. What should we did during lacking 20.000 till 12.000 yr ago?? Kiss
MsArgentana 2 years ago
This man does make an interesting point, but he leaves off the fact that the many great civilizations he is talking about that supposedly have cities underwater were supposed to have reined in times AFTER the flood of the bible. The cities would have been built after the flood. He also leaves off the possibility that the "cities" are actually natural underwater rock formations which is far more likely a possibility. Very interesting thoughts though.
jackskellingtonsora 2 years ago
The things you are talking about are natural formations, not civilizations. This is a case of something that looks designed but isn't.
So the rest of your rant is pointless.
ManicEightBall 2 years ago
Proof?
wannabeebee 2 years ago
I don't suppose you've heard of the null hypothesis. Do you want me to prove I'm NOT an alien inhabiting a middle-aged man's body as well?
Give me a specific formation and we can talk.
ManicEightBall 2 years ago
It isnt known if the undersea buildings are natural formations or not.
wannabeebee 2 years ago
KalachakraandOBeast 2 years ago
yeah ive heard the same thing from multiple sources now.
keggerous 1 year ago
Carbon dating is a good tool when used properly. However evolutionists use it as a one size fits all miracle tool that has almost no limitations. Calibration of carbon dates with known historical records limits it to less than 5,000 years. Rates of organic decay in different mediums, air, sea water, fresh water, ice or different soils are all limiting factors that are not given enough weight when using carbon dating. Once an event is dated it is held too dogmatically.
bil1yjoe 3 years ago
Traditional history is a joke. The western world is the dominante power on earth and our dominate religion started a tradition of suppressing any knowledge that did not agree with their dogma. It is the duty of all of us who are inlightened to spread the word, that much of history and science is BS.
deathtodogma 2 years ago 4
@deathtodogma Dude I can't even tell what your saying. What is traditional history also are you calling christianity out or what?
skinlesscougar 1 year ago
Water leaches carbon. So if you use the C-14 method to date stuff that has been under water, whatever age you derive, is WAY TOO EARLY. So last Ice Age is 10000 BC? Doubt it.
Science is full of unadmitted gaffes: that's my complaint. For example, the Lascaux cave paintings were dated by MEDIA USED: lol of COURSE ochre & charcoal can be 30,000 years old, but the art STYLE is Mycanaean, which of course is far LATER in time. :)
brainout1 3 years ago
Then again, we Christians misread Genesis as six-day creation, when Bible says it's six-day RESTORATION. I did my "brainouty" videos showing Hebrew Bible on that. So not only science is wrong. Seems both sides in the debate need to go back to the drawing board and do more homework. :)
brainout1 3 years ago
Randall... Once again "Thank You" for your insight and sharing of this great information!
Edge... Evolution does have problems.... Swiss cheese I think is the word I am looking for. :)
stevendrake01 3 years ago
Nice bit. The Noachian Flood caused the supposed ice age, that is true. Global warming is also true, since the Earth is slowly returning to toward, not to, it's prior warmer state. The amazingly increased number of floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, and tornadoes, famines, all this are the long term result of the Noachian Flood!
NephilimFree 3 years ago
knockout left hook Randy!
Love it!
god bless
eddbolt 3 years ago
WOW! Home Run Randall!
Paranormaltruths 3 years ago
YOU SHOULD MAKE A BOOK
lilchrizz123 3 years ago
IT DOES
lilchrizz123 3 years ago
What!?
Science has two different fields of study that contradict one another? The next thing you're going to tell me is that Evolution has problems.
LOL!
TheEdge012 3 years ago
Evo isn't a complete theory but most of it's true. It's daft to say such a big and complex theory is without problems.
septigus3 3 years ago