This is great - thanks for uploading it. It fits OCR GCSE Religious Studies Syllabus B paper 602 perfectly. Great for GCSE students. It's also a good intro for A'level religious studies science and religion topic at A2.
13.7 BILLION years ago???? This is at least the 25th ESTIMATE of the age of the Universe since the 1700's which really proves that you guys DON'T KNOW the real age of the Universe.
@bornagain001 radiometric dating of materials from space,the physics trigonometry invovled with measuring the distance of stars and galaxies, you kno ...THOSE CALCULATIONS.
@bornagain001 microwave background radiation, speed of light n the light that is reaching us now. let me spin ur head for a bit, some of the galaxies that we see in r not actually thr, they were thr billions of years ago but their light is reaching to us NOW, so we see them thr BUT they r not actually thr..
galaxies r movin away frm each other- observed by Hubble and Hubble telescope that's flyin in the space.
we can go all day long about evidence n calculations. THESR R FACTS!!
@chinamanspeakenlis .....When God tells us how HE MADE man and woman...does it indicate that HE MADE them as babies and they grew into adulthood? NO. HE CREATED them fully formed as well as the earth was fully formed and ready to occupy by the first humans. God did the same with the Universe. It DOES APPEAR to be billions of years old because God CREATED IT fully aged. It's really very easy to understand. Far easier than trying to understand how the Big Bang created it.
@ZULKARNEYN2099's videos are all bullshit. This goes without saying, but any creation "science" video with the ratings disabled and ESPECIALLY the comments censored should be instantly dismissed on that basis alone.
i can tell you just how life was made the opposite of nothing is everything and the bible says there's a time for everything and every activity one thing that is a part of everything is seperation the past travels behind us and the present travels ahead of the past so they are opposites that when time ticks it mirrors the past with the opposite therefore nothing being past becomes something being present watch my video on creation i know way more
it is important to realize that the universe is not expanding into empty space. The expansion of the universe is not supposed to be like an expanding cloud os smoke that fills more and more volume in a room. the galaxies that are moving away from us are not moving into another, previously unoccupied, part of the universe. Space is being created in between the galaxies and so the distance between them increases, creating illusion of motion of one galaxy relative to another.
amazing how we theorize the creation of the universe, and it's fun and all, but we have no clue 'what' electricity 'is'. sure people pop out words and jargon about imbalances in charge etc, but no-one truly knows what it is. unless someone would like to clue me in..
Saying things like this "is fact" really brings into question the whole philosophy of science. Its really not as simple as saying this is proven and repeatable etc therefore its fact. Doing this doesnt adhere the fundamentals of scientific progression. Its far to polarised a viewpoint.
@UpliftingSpirit The point is that they're saying what is known. They're not making shit up because the lack of knowledge makes them uncomfortable. It would be nice to know everything but the evidence and our intelligence does not allow us to infer everything. That which we can infer is pretty awesome, and who knows, maybe one day we might be able to figure it out.
no no no no no, the way it was made is called GOD!! and we did not evolve there is no proof to that and if 2010 years passed by and no one has "evolved" i doubt it will ever happen or has even happened b4
Humans may never again evolve naturally (in any useful or progressive way). This is because for example in the wild if a human was born with down syndrome or asthma it would be less likely to survive ( you no like, ' O shit a lion' the guy without asthma gets away and goes on to breed his non asthma genes are passed on to his offspring, asthma guy dies) In the long run the percentage of people with asthma would get lower that's evolution. There''s no plan it's just a process
@mgore90 Well technically what I described was natural selection which is the 'theory', for the fact of evolution. It's just common sense. If there are two giraffes and one has a longer neck in a place were the only tree leaves are high up, which one is going to survive and go on to mate? The tall one, that's how over time a group a zebra/horse like animals evolved into giraffes. You must understand that evolution has no process, it's just a word to describe what happens in the natural world
@Gerard300349024 "no no no no no, the way it was made is called GOD!! "
How do you know that God didn't make the universe in the way described in the video? The catholic church has no problem accepting modern cosmology and astronomy - there's a even an official catholic observatory doing real scientific research. They take a similar position on evolution, too. It happened because that's the way God chose to create animals and people.
@mandolinic i doubt evolution happened because there is no proof and we havent evolved from humans and its been like thousands of years or whatever and no one knows how the universe was made because they did not create it and i cant believe we popped out of no where and catholic religion is wrong itself it contradicts itself i really dont like to name what religion im in but i just believe in god and its messengers
Who told you there was no proof? Was it your pastor? Was it a creationist web site? Did you just assume there's no proof without really investigating?
The ten of thousands of peer-reviewed papers which have been published are more than enough proof for the scientific community, but I suppose you know better than all of them.
If you can be bothered to find out how the world really works, check out the channels for CDK007 and thunderf00t
@mandolinic sorry but there is no proof only theory and theory is not fact because you can theorize about nonsense really btw i dont go to church but i study the bible alot and not only christian but the quran and the tora etc.
You clearly don't understand what scientists mean when they use the word "Theory".
I find it sad that someone as intelligent of you rejects the real truth about how life, the universe and everything works, and instead embraces fluffy but comforting nonsense.
Fortunately, not everyone feels this way, or we'd still be living in caves, cowering from the noise of thunder and dying from curable diseases in our 30s.
@mandolinic you dont understand when i say no one knows how the world was created because no one was there when it was 'theory' is like an idea or a possibility not fact i could make a theory that hercules shitted out this whole universe but you would only believe it if i were a scientist right
@Gerard300349024 You still don't understand what is meant by Theory. You could produce a *hypothesis* that Hercules shitted out the whole universe, but for it to be a THEORY there'd have to be an overwhelming body of evidence to support it.
Big Bang and Evolution have this overwhelming body of evidence, which is why they are *theories* and not *hypotheses*.
Do you see how it works now? A theory has *evidence* - and lots of it. Enough evidence to persuade the scientific community.
@mandolinic your contradicting yourself because theory's is a hypothesis with scientific principles, in other word theories are practically assumptions you can assume whatever with any piece of evidence but unless you have hardcore evidence it is not proof. the scientific community does not get persuaded into these things most scientist get paid lots of money to "research" BULLSHIT like global warming and 2012.
not from one atom, but from a singularity, smaller than an atom, but extremely massive. Its a current hypothesis about the origin of the Universe. It seems to fit the known facts, but needs dark matter to work, so it could be wrong.
We should already know much of what was said barring the speaker's beliefs that things are the cause their own existence. Everything has a cause but things are not the cause of themselves. That is like saying that a carved wooden statue can do something for you. Objects are able to do nothing of themselves. Things do what they do because of the orders they are given. The question we should be asking in science is, "Who is giving the orders so that things turn out the way they do?"
well, at least science evolves and perfect it self... Puting God sauce into the equation is just the easy way out. Imagine if the modern father of atom thought" hey why da fck am i studying this shitty little atoms, everything is made by God, ill just go study God instead"
I listened to it for two minutes & everything he said until then is at its best, good imagination and everybody just sits there and just accepts all this nonsense. The fact is that these things ain't facts at all, sadly he begins with "we know that" no sir, we don't know, the same like evolution theory also complete speculation presented as fact. I call that pretty deluded & feel sorry for all the children in school who grow up(brainwashed) believing non fact as fact. Deluded? yep pretty much so
That's right... the children are getting brainwashed into not to believe in magic sky daddies, unicorns, talking bushes, talking snakes and dinosaur saddle-backing giants who lived 800 years! Poor children!
Professor Cox, meet Mr. Atom! To say that big bang evolved into atom on it's own is pure nonsense. Cox should take a course in IT so that he might understand that laws, codes must have a source! Amazing how modern science refuses to address the issue in logic! Creation by itself! Ludicrous. This fool gets paid for this?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I believe in God almighty who have created everyone and every living things, ppl are just arrogant and don't want to believe in the creator, there is True and False, there is Right and Wrong, so it is not surprising there are Beliver and Non-Beliver.
I find it arrogant to outright dismiss science and instead believe in a fictional book of fairy tales. How does one even know they believe in the right religion? Silly.
@Einsteinian99 do u find big bang theory science? first let ask u first,.. do u know the steps in scientific method? this is 2nd grade elementary stuff... it wont be science if it can pass through that... so? if u dont know it how ca u say big bang is true? or evolution, or if u do know tell does it qualify the six steps? if it does not its not science... this is the most basic explaination, u can argue up the scale if cant argue that, there more evidence if u care to investigate
@ouano1 Please do not interject in intelligent discussions if you have nothing to offer or even a counterpoint. Your exclamations illustrate that you have no grasp of science in the least. I also detect undertones of ... well, you know what your are. Please, do tell what you believe then because you have not even stated anything. The best ideas we have so far are evolution (which is a fact) and one possible event for the beginning of the universe. What is your contention?
im sorry if i am interrupting your very intelligent discussion but it just irritates me to read about the evolution theory as SCIENCE, i see your pissed of by my last comment but you must understand in the scientific method, it needs to be proven and be replicated in test to be scientific... now does big bang pass? there also a lot more in evidence which can be found in the net, in our field of medicine and research u cant rely on theories alone,
@ouano1 I am not pissed as much as I am aggravated. It irritates me to see people refute evolution as not fact because it is indeed a fact. Big Bang is a theory. Nobody is arguing that. I find that most people that denounce evolution are usually religious people. How ironic they dismiss science and facts but accept silly ancient superstitious nonsense. Evolution is a load of crap, but my book of magic and fairytales is the real deal. I wish those folks would grow up.
@ ouano1- Sorry, but Evolution IS fact. You come across as someone who doesn't understand what a scientific theory is. A scientific theory is a working modle that pieces together facts to explain how they work. For example, gravity theory. Gravity is a fact, so what's the theory? The theory is how it works. Thus, the theory of evolution is how it works. We have also proven evolution in the labs. Only someone uneducated in evolution would not consider it a fact.
@salex2500 Well, you should know that we actually HAVE observed speciation. In fact, there are a few areas on earth where we can clearly observe it. I don't recall where they are at the moment, though. Regardless, what does that have to do with evolution being factual or not? Even if we had no observation of speciation, there is still mountains of evidence that we have observed and tested that point to it. There isn't any such thing for gravity. We don't even know what causes gravity.
@genobahamut1337 Yes, there are a number of times where scientists thought they've seen speciation, but then were dissaproved. I agree it works this way for subspecies, but one species becoming another, as in changing it's genetic structure and becoming incompatible with the original species, NO. Also, you need not know what speciation is in order to observe it's effects (if it would ever happen, to begin with). You can observe gravity's effects though, also there's a mathematical model for it.
@salex2500 Uh, sorry, but there are clear examples of speciation and places where scientists can see it. It is a definite fact that this occurs whether you care to admit it or not. I know what speciation is. You apparently don't have much knowledge of evolution or of DNA if you can look at the evidence and think that this probably doesn't happen. It most definitely does. Again, there is far more evidence for evolution than for gravity. Deal with it and move on.
@genobahamut1337 Ok, would you please give me the link to an article about that. Once again I am not talking about races, I am talking about brand new species emerging from existing ones
@salex2500 Once again, as I have told you, I don't have where I saw it from. It was about a year ago that I checked it out. Speciation is simply when two breeds of creatures can no longer inter-breed, making them two different species. A cat never stops being a cat, but it can become a kind of cat that can't inter-breed with other cats. When this happens, speciation has occurred and this event can be witnessed in areas where populations are spread out and forced not to mingle too well.
@genobahamut1337 I have to agree with you here. It's the ring species thing. Though the materials I've seen did not say how they determined that the 2 subspecies could not interbreed. Have they tryed "forcing" them? Anyway let's say it is valid, they still have the same genetic structure though. We do not know of any cats doing this, and the most common mammal on this planet is overlooked: Humans. We actually even have some reproductive problems, some of which medicine can overcome.
@salex2500 I can't say that I know all the details about it, but I'm sure they would have tried to make them inter breed to determine that they couldn't. Anyway, that is just one example. I don't know about human inter breeding problems. Regardless, even if we had no witnessed speciation, there is still mountains of evidence going for it and we have witnessed enough change within a species to know that they someday become different species.
@genobahamut1337 Ok so you're inclined to say evolution must be true. I can't argue with that. As well as I am inclined to say it will eventually be dismissed. What I am arguing is that some people say it is a fact, when in fact it was never proven, and there are no experiments supporting it. But these people claim it all over the tv, and in school. No problem teaching it, but just dont forget to mention its not a known fact. As for religion, I think it was already dismissed beyond any doubt.
@salex2500 Thing is, evolution IS a known, proven fact of reality. There are mountains of evidence supporting it. The fossil record, DNA, retro viruses. recorded genetic drift, it's all there and well documented. You do not have a leg to stand on by saying it is not proven or that it will be dismissed. There are lots of videos right here on youtube that you can watch about it if you don't want to read about it. Your lack of knowledge is not grounds to say it isn't a fact.
@genobahamut1337 This evidence does not prove it. The fact that species are related does not prove that they evolved from one another. Probably 1000 more theories could be formulated based on the same evidence. If it were a fact, you would have proof, yet there is none.
@salex2500 There is proof in the form of all of the evidence pointing to evolution. We also have observed natural selection taking place. Even if we had no observation of speciation, observations of natural selection is direct, observable proof that animals change from one generation to the next. There are no other theories. Species change and all living things are related. It's not going to go away. It is a proven scientific fact and, I'm sorry, but you'll have to deal with that someday.
There is plenty of proof for evolution, more than we have for gravity. One of the most recent and most solid proofs we have gained is a germ that evolved to digest nylon, a man made substance. Previously it was unable to, now it can. We recreated the conditions in a lab with nearly identical results, the germ was once again able to evolve to digest nylon. This is proof of Macro evolution brought about by many micro evolutions.
Look it up and see for yourself. Evolution is a fact.
@ObsidianWizroh Ok that's more like the kind of answers I wanted to hear. Do you have any link to it, so I can read about it? And isn't this more like adaptation?
All evolution has ever been is adaption. As creatures breed they mutate. The ones that help stick around and breed more. The ones that hurt kill the creatures off faster. That's what Natural Selection is. And doing that many times, so much that two species cannot breed successfully anymore, is macro evolution. It's very simple to understand if you look it up.
Didn't work as well as I'd hoped, but you can see AronRa listed. Click his name and watch his videos. He's pretty much all about evolution.
One final point, fossils very clearly demonstrate evolution, as well as the retro viruses. They use those viruses as well as mutations and elevation/location, among many other things, to determine the species of the fossil as well as where it fits in the line, another thing AronRa speaks about quite often.
@ObsidianWizroh I understand the theory. I just do not think adaptation is definitive proof for evolution.
Here's an example. Dif. species can have different number of chromosomes. If it can be observed that a species changes the number of chromosomes on its own, that would pretty much convince me that evolution is a fact.
Saying that evolution is simply adaptation, but over a very long period of time is wishful thinking.
There are millions of species, but we never seen this happening.
@genobahamut1337 Unlike a mathematical proof, a scientific theory is empirical, and is always open to falsification if new evidence is presented. That is, no theory is ever considered strictly certain as science works under a fallibilistic view.
@paralelSun Yes, I realize that scientific theories are always open to falsification. The thing is, there has been no new evidence to go against it as of yet, and everything we have found points to it happening. This is why I can say that it is a fact. A definite truth of which there is no evidence against and overwhelming evidence in support of. We have even made many observations of evolution. Everything we have right now proves that it occurs.
@paralelSun dont get me wrong, i love evolution. Its a beautiful thing. Makes you realise how meaningless our perception of time really is. What has come and gone, occurs in a blink of an universal eye.
@genobahamut1337 Certain aspects of evolution may be observable, but the claim that one kind of creature given enough time becomes a totally different kind of creature is pure speculation, thus faith. It leaves the realm of fact and science and enters religion and faith.
@miamidan44 No, it's not speculation or faith. First of all, it's logical that many small changes over time makes a new species. Second, we have proof that it has happened. Every test preformed shows that animals evolved into different species. It doesn't have to be directly observed to know it happens, especially when we can observe it in the fossil record if you really want to see how it happened. None of it is speculation, you simply either do not understand or choose to ignore the evidence.
@genobahamut1337 "it's logical that many small changes over time makes a new species." If by "new species" you mean one creature becoming a completely different creature (a cell into a fish...into an ape-like creature...into a man for instance) over whatever number of years you want to throw in, then yes, it is speculation. "Every test preformed shows that animals evolved into different species." Such as? "we can observe it in the fossil record" again, such as?
@miamidan44 You seem to have a very bad understanding of what evolution is. The creatures we came from were fish-like, but they weren't what we classify to be fish today, and we never stopped being ape-like. We are still apes and will always be in the ape category. We didn't go from ape to man, we became a type of ape called man. As for tests, look at dog breeders. They make different types of dogs, selecting for certain traits. As for the fossil record, go look it up. Don't be lazy.
@miamidan44 If you're going to continue to argue this out with me, I'd advise you send me private messages. Arguing here will just clutter the comments and limit how much we can say.
@genobahamut1337 - Evolution is not fact-the big bang is called a theroy for good reason. It takes more faith to beleive in Evolution than creation, because you have to beleive nothing exploded and here we are.
@TheBiblestudyman Uhg... You know, I'd prefer not to deal with your brand of stupid. Go look up evolution and the big bang and find out what they actually are... While you're at it, look up what a scientific theory is and stop bothering me with mindless lines you've been taught to fire out. You're not impressing anyone.
@genobahamut1337 Geno, don't you get tired of explaining simple scientific concepts like: hypothesis, peer-review, theory etc. !?!?!? It's almost like people intentionally make one explain theory over & over & over just to confuse the debate because they don't want creationism to be examined....because if it was, it would collapse under the weight of it's own implausibility. If I have to hear: "This or that is only a theory" again, I'm gonna hurl..sigh....
Gundamfreak4, the word "gh" used in Isaiah 40:22 means "circle", not "sphere". Hebrew had another word for sphere, "rwd".
The Bible clearly describes the earth as a flat, circular disk supported by pillar-like foundations and covered by a solid, gated firmament holding back the waters of the cosmos.
This cosmology is the standard ancient near eastern view of the universe and it is highly unlikely the ancient Judahites and Israelites believed the earth was spherical.
The stila found at Tel Dan proves only the existence of a dynasty founded by David. It does not prove the veracity of biblical prophecy, and it certainly does not prove the existence of a creator.
Evolution has mountains of evidence which now includes molecular genetic evidence indicating the interrelatedness of all species. This is the same type of evidence that courts rely on to prove the paternity of a child.
The theory of evolution is not disproved by the discovery of King David's dynasty.
@steevmac what? mountains of evidence? or mountain of lies? have u heard about the hoax of darwins missing links? 50 yrs after they presented it, it was found out that they used a bones of ape and bones of a human, tried to fit it and bwala!! there your greatest lie... when scientist inquired 4 the peking man bone suppoesedly a new discovery the hid it and never shown again in the media.. have u read yahoo news lately, astronomers discoverd universe has the same temp, evrywhre, no big bang hapnd
Yes, there really IS mountains of evidence if you'll care to look at it in any science museum archive. You're thinking about Piltdown Man which was an early hoax (not Peking Man). One hoax out of literally thousands of real fossils does nothing to damage the evidence for evolution.
In fact it is now silly talking about a gap or a "missing link" because as soon as a potential intermediate fossil is found, the evolution-deniers say that the number of gaps doubles!!!
Thanks wabawoba, couldnt have put it better myself. Actually Peking Man was NOT a hoax & is now classified as "Homo erectus".
The "missing links" that we now have show, if lined up, an almost unbroken change of skull shape from the chimpanzee-like Australopithecus afarensis, through Austrolopithecus africanus, Homo habilis, Homo rudolphensis, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, to Homo sapiens.
Piltdown man was a hoax exposed by Scientists--a very competitive bunch who still agree conclusively on the truth of evolution as fact and theory.
If you believe the earth is round, or in germ theory, or heliocentrism, then you've already accepted science's many discoveries. Evolution is another and with the same mountain of evidence.
There's no such thing as "evolving higher". Evolution works by adapting an organism to its ENVIRONMENT not to some higher ideal. If a particular feature ceases to be a necessity for survival or if we stop needing it (like a tail or the instinct to avoid storms) it'll disappear.
There are species of troglobitic animals (who evolved in dark caves) who have lost their skin pigmentation, vision and even lost their eyes altogether.
Your assuptions are simplistic & show a distinct lack of knowledge.
On behalf of the scientific community, I would like to deeply apologize that current cosmological models conflict with a 2000 year old mythology book(s). We are deeply sorry.
For those who have studied Big Bang cosmology, it is NOT "bs" as they have studied it and performed tests over and over on it. have you? No? Than who are you to critisize?
This is the 3rd time I ask you to quote the bible regarding the world being described as a sphere & not a circle. If you cannot, dont bother replying. Don't bother using the poor excuse of Hebrew translation because it will work against you. If it indeed stated sphere & not circle, what other mistakes & mistranslations does the bible carry? If it is so suggestable to error, why take it seriously at all?
Realize that everything you claim can be looked up.
i've read the bible and it did not say SPHERICAL, it actually said circular which is incorrect. Unless I missed something, why not site your source, which book, chapter & verse?
Well gundamfreak4, I'll admit that many Athiests will give videos promoting these topics higher ratings, but it also has to do with the fact that many Creationists on youtube make themselves look really stupid. Many try to discredit science, which has a logical and analytical backing, with religion, something that has no concrete backing besides a few books of self contradictions. You coul argue that its because the bible is the work of man, but then you need to realize that is what you worship.
we have considered it... and we have long since then dismissed it. for centuries Christians have gotten it wrong & the more science we know, the less vadility the Bible has. The Earth revolves around the Sun & not vice versa, the Earth is not flat... we have shot up through Heaven & there ewre no golden gates or angels chilling, we surpassed that & landed on the Moon... we are too advanced to consider such primitive worldviews that have an abundance scientific of evidence to contradict it
I got a Bible right here, correct me. Book/Chapter/Verse? But before you continue, circle doesnt equal sphere. I HOPE i dont have to explain the difference...
1) First of all it uses the word for disk or circle, not for sphere or ball
2) Have you considered that any other made up version of a god, heaven or hell could be true?
3) The question is how likely is it based upon the evidence, there's no evidence of heaven, hell or god. All you have are fables from ancient desert cultures with no evidence to validate the claimed miracles and preconceived assumptions that it's true when looking at any evidence.
I cant wait till Christians have no choice but to admit they are wrong. Im so sick of hearing, "if the big bang did happen, who do you think lit the fuse.. GOD DID"
I believe there probably is a creator, but he/she is exactly the same as you, me and the bumbling scientists at CERN, the universe we see and experience was likely to be an experiment by an equally progressive alien race with atoms, particles and quarks, the second we learn to create life we will destroy all present life, similar to hindu ethics, Shiva the destroyer of the world, following Brahma the creator.
I'm impressed. Such a cool video, but people worry more about flamewars in the comments. Forget about the creationists, let's talk about the good things of life. =P
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Religion asserts wisdom. The fact is that religion had produced many great men like st. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Augustin. Their wisdom and intelligence in logic is far too great and they explain the Dogma base on logic and reasoning. Religion is not JUST faith. The evidence both supernatural and historical is not just extraordinarily compelling not equal to manipulated bones and proven inaccuracy of radiometric dating.
I think just BECAUSE humanity can't get their 'act' together we need to expand into the universe.
We have the knowledge mostly, but noone want to take the first step unless they see a pile of gold in the other end.
We know most of the building blocks to terraform planets. Only that by todays methods it would take a huge amount of time. But we have the means to mine and harvest minerals, and by far the most important thing, water. We are actually using it up. It disappears from our planet.
How are we running out of water? I can understand running out of fresh water, leaving only salt water which can be filtered, but water in general? The only way I can think of for that to happen is if we're running out of hydrogen somehow.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Actually the laws of physics points against naturalism. Nature cannot and will never create itself. Because if it did then It must have itself first before creating it. The natural processes you see in the nebulae which creates stars via natural process isn't really the key creation of the universe. This goes back to rather what created the big bang in this fairytale. As sexual reproduction is impossible if there's no supernatural creation started it to have body for the process.
Man, I really wonder when creationists will finally get that the big bang is not a creation of matter, just the changing state of it. Your comment shows that you don't understand the facts, the position of science or that you even watched this video and paid any attention. You aren't having a conversation, you're rambling, so please stop it. Learn the position you oppose before you make a statement against it, because you just come across as ignorant. Thank you, and no offense intended.
The laws of physics points DIRECTLY to "naturalism", look at the First Law of Thermodynamics:
energy can be transformed (changed from one form to another), but cannot be created or destroyed.
Before the Big Bang energy (matter) was crunched into an point of singularity, it existed so it was never created nor destroyed. A supernatural being would not only break the first law of thermodynamics, thus I call REALITY FAIL on you!
Sexual reproduction does not necessarily reqire sexual organs. Early cells could have reproduced sexually by conjoined together, mixing genes, and then spliting a part into more cells. With the increased genetic variation the cells would have been able to evolve much more quickly eventually leading to sexual reproduction as we know it today.
Personally, this makes more sense than the idea that something that created Hitler created everything is a week. I guess this is for people capable of critical thinking and are competent enough to question things.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This man is lying. "We know that universe started 13.7 billion years ago" with a silly picture along with the frigging WMAP satellite. This is not true! The answer is, "No." No one knows how old the universe is or how it's been created and any scientists agrees with this assertion. 13.7 billion years is based on the fairy tale big bang which is a long natural process IE without God in it. So don't take it literally and believe the young earth until there's really no evidence for evolution.
And how do you know that we don't know the age of the universe? How much research have you done into the claims and what reasoning they used to come to such conclusions? Really there is NO evidence for evolution? How do you know this? Do you posses some sort of omnisciency that I do not? If so what are you doing on youtube? Surely you could find a better media for spreading your vast wealth of knowledge for the betterment of man kind.
You're not open minded. Scientists can accept , they don't know. Yes of course I know carbon dating simply is accepted as being inaccurate and not really measure any age at all. It would not be rational to say earth is 4.5 billion years old while presenting few rare little stones and some manipulated bones of homo Sapiens.
How am I not open minded? I have not denied any substantiated claim that you have put forth. I can accept that I do not know some things. I don't know how matter came into existance. I don't know how photons or gravitons work or how they are able appear and vanish into empty space. Being open minded means you take in all the facts available and form a conclusion on them regardless of personal bias.
I have researched the facts both for and against evolution and the big bang and have made my conclusion as to there validity. If there was evidence that blatantly contradicted either theory I would try to find a new one that could account for all of the evidence. As of yet this has not happened unless there is something that I am unaware of and if such is true please share your tid bit of information with me
NO EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION???? BULLSHIT!!! There is scientific proof of evolution! Yet there is no scientific proof of any "God". So tell me, if your "God" created everything, why did it create Hitler? Keep in mind, Jesus was a Jew according to the bible(which is the most widely know Jewish Zombie fairy tale).
This is great - thanks for uploading it. It fits OCR GCSE Religious Studies Syllabus B paper 602 perfectly. Great for GCSE students. It's also a good intro for A'level religious studies science and religion topic at A2.
anniemaggie53 2 days ago
This is a great video
simysimss 5 days ago
love the video man
rodswebdesign 6 days ago
some sweet info here
staranjela 1 week ago
great video thanks
smuggecko 1 week ago
very interesting video thanks
msjessypp 1 week ago
i enjoyed this vid
bribribri56 1 week ago
really informative and interesting
jessyjessy4 1 week ago
Not much TOLERANCE for those who disagree with you is there.
bornagain001 3 weeks ago
13.7 BILLION years ago???? This is at least the 25th ESTIMATE of the age of the Universe since the 1700's which really proves that you guys DON'T KNOW the real age of the Universe.
bornagain001 6 months ago
@bornagain001 it changes as we find more information
konohanominato 5 months ago
@konohanominato ...so what you are saying is that NO ONE really knows...it's all speculation.
bornagain001 5 months ago
@bornagain001 no its not speculation its calculation
and what im saying is no one knows percisley
konohanominato 5 months ago
@konohanominato ...WHAT CALCULATION?
bornagain001 5 months ago
@bornagain001 radiometric dating of materials from space,the physics trigonometry invovled with measuring the distance of stars and galaxies, you kno ...THOSE CALCULATIONS.
konohanominato 5 months ago 3
@bornagain001 Your a dumb ass.
DeathFollowMe 3 weeks ago
@bornagain001 microwave background radiation, speed of light n the light that is reaching us now. let me spin ur head for a bit, some of the galaxies that we see in r not actually thr, they were thr billions of years ago but their light is reaching to us NOW, so we see them thr BUT they r not actually thr..
galaxies r movin away frm each other- observed by Hubble and Hubble telescope that's flyin in the space.
we can go all day long about evidence n calculations. THESR R FACTS!!
chinamanspeakenlis 2 weeks ago
@chinamanspeakenlis .....When God tells us how HE MADE man and woman...does it indicate that HE MADE them as babies and they grew into adulthood? NO. HE CREATED them fully formed as well as the earth was fully formed and ready to occupy by the first humans. God did the same with the Universe. It DOES APPEAR to be billions of years old because God CREATED IT fully aged. It's really very easy to understand. Far easier than trying to understand how the Big Bang created it.
bornagain001 2 weeks ago
@ZULKARNEYN2099's videos are all bullshit. This goes without saying, but any creation "science" video with the ratings disabled and ESPECIALLY the comments censored should be instantly dismissed on that basis alone.
incomprehensible14 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i can tell you just how life was made the opposite of nothing is everything and the bible says there's a time for everything and every activity one thing that is a part of everything is seperation the past travels behind us and the present travels ahead of the past so they are opposites that when time ticks it mirrors the past with the opposite therefore nothing being past becomes something being present watch my video on creation i know way more
t2k2011 7 months ago
it is important to realize that the universe is not expanding into empty space. The expansion of the universe is not supposed to be like an expanding cloud os smoke that fills more and more volume in a room. the galaxies that are moving away from us are not moving into another, previously unoccupied, part of the universe. Space is being created in between the galaxies and so the distance between them increases, creating illusion of motion of one galaxy relative to another.
Haokennxt 8 months ago
amazing how we theorize the creation of the universe, and it's fun and all, but we have no clue 'what' electricity 'is'. sure people pop out words and jargon about imbalances in charge etc, but no-one truly knows what it is. unless someone would like to clue me in..
planetoperator 9 months ago
@planetoperator And you might not know who you really are, but that doesn't stop you from being and living.
LeRoiJojo 8 months ago
en wikipedia org wiki Evolution_as_theory_and_fact
apparently nowadays in science there are 2 kinds of "facts"
which begs the question: are there also more kinds of "bullshit" ?
certainly the bible is more bullshittier than evolution, yet what about some real facts?
salex2500 1 year ago
The universe will end, NOT when God demands it, but when the Spiral races cause the SPIRAL NEMESIS!
orgixvi3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Saying things like this "is fact" really brings into question the whole philosophy of science. Its really not as simple as saying this is proven and repeatable etc therefore its fact. Doing this doesnt adhere the fundamentals of scientific progression. Its far to polarised a viewpoint.
paralelSun 1 year ago
@paralelSun
A fact is something that is known or observed to be true. anything proclaimed to be a fact is simply what they know to be true.
ObsidianWizroh 1 year ago
Comment removed
paralelSun 1 year ago
Brian Cox is excited about being turned on. oo er
jacksawild 1 year ago
But what was surrounding that first particle?
And where did it come from? Did it float here due to an explosion from another universe? And if so, where did THAT first particle come from?
If these questions can't be answered properly, then what's the point in saying that's what happened? when they don't know what happened BEFORE that?
ah it wrecks my brain!!
UpliftingSpirit 1 year ago
@UpliftingSpirit The point is that they're saying what is known. They're not making shit up because the lack of knowledge makes them uncomfortable. It would be nice to know everything but the evidence and our intelligence does not allow us to infer everything. That which we can infer is pretty awesome, and who knows, maybe one day we might be able to figure it out.
jacksawild 1 year ago
@jacksawild Wow! That's an awesome comment. Thumbs up.
mandolinic 1 year ago
@UpliftingSpirit
1. That first particle was the whole universe - space was tiny so it occupied all space.
2. Where the first particle came from is the next big question. Watch this space.
3. What happened before? Time started with the big bang so there was no before - it's like saying what's north of the north pole!
This is cutting edge stuff. It *should* wreck your brain.
mandolinic 1 year ago
Interesting to note how South Korea is all lit up and North Korea is totally dark.
777shaitan666 1 year ago
Is this video not working for anyone?
googoo120 1 year ago
snarlingly...forget God! it's not an answer, because..."who made God?"
and Squeakeralpha, cannot possibly imagine "a singularity",
..a Big Bang would happen before that point is reached...
maybe there are trillions of big bangs like black holes resulting in creations at different wave lengths imperceptible to us?
Where are the Eisteins to work this out?????
enniopat 1 year ago
no no no no no, the way it was made is called GOD!! and we did not evolve there is no proof to that and if 2010 years passed by and no one has "evolved" i doubt it will ever happen or has even happened b4
Gerard300349024 1 year ago
@Gerard300349024
Humans may never again evolve naturally (in any useful or progressive way). This is because for example in the wild if a human was born with down syndrome or asthma it would be less likely to survive ( you no like, ' O shit a lion' the guy without asthma gets away and goes on to breed his non asthma genes are passed on to his offspring, asthma guy dies) In the long run the percentage of people with asthma would get lower that's evolution. There''s no plan it's just a process
mgore90 1 year ago
@mgore90 Well technically what I described was natural selection which is the 'theory', for the fact of evolution. It's just common sense. If there are two giraffes and one has a longer neck in a place were the only tree leaves are high up, which one is going to survive and go on to mate? The tall one, that's how over time a group a zebra/horse like animals evolved into giraffes. You must understand that evolution has no process, it's just a word to describe what happens in the natural world
mgore90 1 year ago
@Gerard300349024 "no no no no no, the way it was made is called GOD!! "
How do you know that God didn't make the universe in the way described in the video? The catholic church has no problem accepting modern cosmology and astronomy - there's a even an official catholic observatory doing real scientific research. They take a similar position on evolution, too. It happened because that's the way God chose to create animals and people.
mandolinic 1 year ago
@mandolinic i doubt evolution happened because there is no proof and we havent evolved from humans and its been like thousands of years or whatever and no one knows how the universe was made because they did not create it and i cant believe we popped out of no where and catholic religion is wrong itself it contradicts itself i really dont like to name what religion im in but i just believe in god and its messengers
Gerard300349024 1 year ago
@Gerard300349024 "there is no proof ".
Who told you there was no proof? Was it your pastor? Was it a creationist web site? Did you just assume there's no proof without really investigating?
The ten of thousands of peer-reviewed papers which have been published are more than enough proof for the scientific community, but I suppose you know better than all of them.
If you can be bothered to find out how the world really works, check out the channels for CDK007 and thunderf00t
mandolinic 1 year ago
@mandolinic sorry but there is no proof only theory and theory is not fact because you can theorize about nonsense really btw i dont go to church but i study the bible alot and not only christian but the quran and the tora etc.
Gerard300349024 1 year ago
@Gerard300349024 "sorry but there is no proof only theory"
You clearly don't understand what scientists mean when they use the word "Theory".
I find it sad that someone as intelligent of you rejects the real truth about how life, the universe and everything works, and instead embraces fluffy but comforting nonsense.
Fortunately, not everyone feels this way, or we'd still be living in caves, cowering from the noise of thunder and dying from curable diseases in our 30s.
mandolinic 1 year ago
@mandolinic you dont understand when i say no one knows how the world was created because no one was there when it was 'theory' is like an idea or a possibility not fact i could make a theory that hercules shitted out this whole universe but you would only believe it if i were a scientist right
Gerard300349024 1 year ago
@Gerard300349024 You still don't understand what is meant by Theory. You could produce a *hypothesis* that Hercules shitted out the whole universe, but for it to be a THEORY there'd have to be an overwhelming body of evidence to support it.
Big Bang and Evolution have this overwhelming body of evidence, which is why they are *theories* and not *hypotheses*.
Do you see how it works now? A theory has *evidence* - and lots of it. Enough evidence to persuade the scientific community.
mandolinic 1 year ago
@mandolinic your contradicting yourself because theory's is a hypothesis with scientific principles, in other word theories are practically assumptions you can assume whatever with any piece of evidence but unless you have hardcore evidence it is not proof. the scientific community does not get persuaded into these things most scientist get paid lots of money to "research" BULLSHIT like global warming and 2012.
Gerard300349024 1 year ago
@Gerard300349024 Now you're just trolling. Good bye.
mandolinic 1 year ago
all from one atom????
is this a fact?
can this be a fact?
were I less committed to logic, I could turn to religion for less mistery!
enniopat 1 year ago
@enniopat
not from one atom, but from a singularity, smaller than an atom, but extremely massive. Its a current hypothesis about the origin of the Universe. It seems to fit the known facts, but needs dark matter to work, so it could be wrong.
SqueakerAlpha 1 year ago
@enniopat ''smaller'' than a atom, atoms didn't exist in the early universe.
gregrutz 1 year ago
universe is older
FIGHTFANNERD3 2 years ago
We should already know much of what was said barring the speaker's beliefs that things are the cause their own existence. Everything has a cause but things are not the cause of themselves. That is like saying that a carved wooden statue can do something for you. Objects are able to do nothing of themselves. Things do what they do because of the orders they are given. The question we should be asking in science is, "Who is giving the orders so that things turn out the way they do?"
Seekmosttoprophesy 2 years ago
assuming that there is a who
CropDuster33 2 years ago
@CropDuster33 Oops, I responded to myself, you likely don't care about evidence of a Creator anyway.
Seekmosttoprophesy 2 years ago
@Seekmosttoprophesy Observing that orders are being given, we can know there is a Who.
Seekmosttoprophesy 2 years ago
well, at least science evolves and perfect it self... Puting God sauce into the equation is just the easy way out. Imagine if the modern father of atom thought" hey why da fck am i studying this shitty little atoms, everything is made by God, ill just go study God instead"
snarlingfly 2 years ago 19
@snarlingfly haha! nice one.
paralelSun 1 year ago
I appreciated the video.
digikko 2 years ago
I listened to it for two minutes & everything he said until then is at its best, good imagination and everybody just sits there and just accepts all this nonsense. The fact is that these things ain't facts at all, sadly he begins with "we know that" no sir, we don't know, the same like evolution theory also complete speculation presented as fact. I call that pretty deluded & feel sorry for all the children in school who grow up(brainwashed) believing non fact as fact. Deluded? yep pretty much so
devarsi 2 years ago
That's right... the children are getting brainwashed into not to believe in magic sky daddies, unicorns, talking bushes, talking snakes and dinosaur saddle-backing giants who lived 800 years! Poor children!
ozpowermo 2 years ago
i don't belief in that either
devarsi 2 years ago
Well at least you're not a hypocrite...
ozpowermo 2 years ago
More like wizardry...
energyhybrid 2 years ago
OK, I'll be Biblically correct for you:
fucking hydrogen atoms... always up to some wizardry!
ozpowermo 2 years ago
fucking hydrogen atoms.....always up to some trickery
PookySan1 2 years ago
Professor Cox, meet Mr. Atom! To say that big bang evolved into atom on it's own is pure nonsense. Cox should take a course in IT so that he might understand that laws, codes must have a source! Amazing how modern science refuses to address the issue in logic! Creation by itself! Ludicrous. This fool gets paid for this?
energyhybrid 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I believe in God almighty who have created everyone and every living things, ppl are just arrogant and don't want to believe in the creator, there is True and False, there is Right and Wrong, so it is not surprising there are Beliver and Non-Beliver.
MrSheung 2 years ago
I find it arrogant to outright dismiss science and instead believe in a fictional book of fairy tales. How does one even know they believe in the right religion? Silly.
Einsteinian99 2 years ago 8
@Einsteinian99 do u find big bang theory science? first let ask u first,.. do u know the steps in scientific method? this is 2nd grade elementary stuff... it wont be science if it can pass through that... so? if u dont know it how ca u say big bang is true? or evolution, or if u do know tell does it qualify the six steps? if it does not its not science... this is the most basic explaination, u can argue up the scale if cant argue that, there more evidence if u care to investigate
ouano1 2 years ago
Too bad you don't know what you're talking about lmao.
Seiku 2 years ago
@ouano1 Please do not interject in intelligent discussions if you have nothing to offer or even a counterpoint. Your exclamations illustrate that you have no grasp of science in the least. I also detect undertones of ... well, you know what your are. Please, do tell what you believe then because you have not even stated anything. The best ideas we have so far are evolution (which is a fact) and one possible event for the beginning of the universe. What is your contention?
Einsteinian99 2 years ago
im sorry if i am interrupting your very intelligent discussion but it just irritates me to read about the evolution theory as SCIENCE, i see your pissed of by my last comment but you must understand in the scientific method, it needs to be proven and be replicated in test to be scientific... now does big bang pass? there also a lot more in evidence which can be found in the net, in our field of medicine and research u cant rely on theories alone,
ouano1 2 years ago
@ouano1 I am not pissed as much as I am aggravated. It irritates me to see people refute evolution as not fact because it is indeed a fact. Big Bang is a theory. Nobody is arguing that. I find that most people that denounce evolution are usually religious people. How ironic they dismiss science and facts but accept silly ancient superstitious nonsense. Evolution is a load of crap, but my book of magic and fairytales is the real deal. I wish those folks would grow up.
Einsteinian99 2 years ago
@ ouano1- Sorry, but Evolution IS fact. You come across as someone who doesn't understand what a scientific theory is. A scientific theory is a working modle that pieces together facts to explain how they work. For example, gravity theory. Gravity is a fact, so what's the theory? The theory is how it works. Thus, the theory of evolution is how it works. We have also proven evolution in the labs. Only someone uneducated in evolution would not consider it a fact.
genobahamut1337 2 years ago 39
@genobahamut1337 one can observe gravity. nobody ever observed evolution, as in speciation. and NO, I am not a religious person.
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500 Well, you should know that we actually HAVE observed speciation. In fact, there are a few areas on earth where we can clearly observe it. I don't recall where they are at the moment, though. Regardless, what does that have to do with evolution being factual or not? Even if we had no observation of speciation, there is still mountains of evidence that we have observed and tested that point to it. There isn't any such thing for gravity. We don't even know what causes gravity.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 Yes, there are a number of times where scientists thought they've seen speciation, but then were dissaproved. I agree it works this way for subspecies, but one species becoming another, as in changing it's genetic structure and becoming incompatible with the original species, NO. Also, you need not know what speciation is in order to observe it's effects (if it would ever happen, to begin with). You can observe gravity's effects though, also there's a mathematical model for it.
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500 Uh, sorry, but there are clear examples of speciation and places where scientists can see it. It is a definite fact that this occurs whether you care to admit it or not. I know what speciation is. You apparently don't have much knowledge of evolution or of DNA if you can look at the evidence and think that this probably doesn't happen. It most definitely does. Again, there is far more evidence for evolution than for gravity. Deal with it and move on.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 Ok, would you please give me the link to an article about that. Once again I am not talking about races, I am talking about brand new species emerging from existing ones
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500 Once again, as I have told you, I don't have where I saw it from. It was about a year ago that I checked it out. Speciation is simply when two breeds of creatures can no longer inter-breed, making them two different species. A cat never stops being a cat, but it can become a kind of cat that can't inter-breed with other cats. When this happens, speciation has occurred and this event can be witnessed in areas where populations are spread out and forced not to mingle too well.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 I have to agree with you here. It's the ring species thing. Though the materials I've seen did not say how they determined that the 2 subspecies could not interbreed. Have they tryed "forcing" them? Anyway let's say it is valid, they still have the same genetic structure though. We do not know of any cats doing this, and the most common mammal on this planet is overlooked: Humans. We actually even have some reproductive problems, some of which medicine can overcome.
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500 I can't say that I know all the details about it, but I'm sure they would have tried to make them inter breed to determine that they couldn't. Anyway, that is just one example. I don't know about human inter breeding problems. Regardless, even if we had no witnessed speciation, there is still mountains of evidence going for it and we have witnessed enough change within a species to know that they someday become different species.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 Ok so you're inclined to say evolution must be true. I can't argue with that. As well as I am inclined to say it will eventually be dismissed. What I am arguing is that some people say it is a fact, when in fact it was never proven, and there are no experiments supporting it. But these people claim it all over the tv, and in school. No problem teaching it, but just dont forget to mention its not a known fact. As for religion, I think it was already dismissed beyond any doubt.
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500 Thing is, evolution IS a known, proven fact of reality. There are mountains of evidence supporting it. The fossil record, DNA, retro viruses. recorded genetic drift, it's all there and well documented. You do not have a leg to stand on by saying it is not proven or that it will be dismissed. There are lots of videos right here on youtube that you can watch about it if you don't want to read about it. Your lack of knowledge is not grounds to say it isn't a fact.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 This evidence does not prove it. The fact that species are related does not prove that they evolved from one another. Probably 1000 more theories could be formulated based on the same evidence. If it were a fact, you would have proof, yet there is none.
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500 There is proof in the form of all of the evidence pointing to evolution. We also have observed natural selection taking place. Even if we had no observation of speciation, observations of natural selection is direct, observable proof that animals change from one generation to the next. There are no other theories. Species change and all living things are related. It's not going to go away. It is a proven scientific fact and, I'm sorry, but you'll have to deal with that someday.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@salex2500
There is plenty of proof for evolution, more than we have for gravity. One of the most recent and most solid proofs we have gained is a germ that evolved to digest nylon, a man made substance. Previously it was unable to, now it can. We recreated the conditions in a lab with nearly identical results, the germ was once again able to evolve to digest nylon. This is proof of Macro evolution brought about by many micro evolutions.
Look it up and see for yourself. Evolution is a fact.
ObsidianWizroh 1 year ago
@ObsidianWizroh Ok that's more like the kind of answers I wanted to hear. Do you have any link to it, so I can read about it? And isn't this more like adaptation?
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500
I can't post links in the comment section. Then again, I think this might work.
@AronRa
If that does work, look at his videos.
All evolution has ever been is adaption. As creatures breed they mutate. The ones that help stick around and breed more. The ones that hurt kill the creatures off faster. That's what Natural Selection is. And doing that many times, so much that two species cannot breed successfully anymore, is macro evolution. It's very simple to understand if you look it up.
ObsidianWizroh 1 year ago
@ObsidianWizroh
Didn't work as well as I'd hoped, but you can see AronRa listed. Click his name and watch his videos. He's pretty much all about evolution.
One final point, fossils very clearly demonstrate evolution, as well as the retro viruses. They use those viruses as well as mutations and elevation/location, among many other things, to determine the species of the fossil as well as where it fits in the line, another thing AronRa speaks about quite often.
ObsidianWizroh 1 year ago
@ObsidianWizroh I understand the theory. I just do not think adaptation is definitive proof for evolution.
Here's an example. Dif. species can have different number of chromosomes. If it can be observed that a species changes the number of chromosomes on its own, that would pretty much convince me that evolution is a fact.
Saying that evolution is simply adaptation, but over a very long period of time is wishful thinking.
There are millions of species, but we never seen this happening.
salex2500 1 year ago
@salex2500
Yes, we have. I will explain more, with links, in PM.
ObsidianWizroh 1 year ago
@salex2500 that is the point, it happens and it is called MUTATION
BR177 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 Unlike a mathematical proof, a scientific theory is empirical, and is always open to falsification if new evidence is presented. That is, no theory is ever considered strictly certain as science works under a fallibilistic view.
paralelSun 1 year ago
@paralelSun Yes, I realize that scientific theories are always open to falsification. The thing is, there has been no new evidence to go against it as of yet, and everything we have found points to it happening. This is why I can say that it is a fact. A definite truth of which there is no evidence against and overwhelming evidence in support of. We have even made many observations of evolution. Everything we have right now proves that it occurs.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 Beware of using the term 'fact'.. its broad and subjective to our human experience.
paralelSun 1 year ago
@paralelSun dont get me wrong, i love evolution. Its a beautiful thing. Makes you realise how meaningless our perception of time really is. What has come and gone, occurs in a blink of an universal eye.
paralelSun 1 year ago
Comment removed
paralelSun 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 Certain aspects of evolution may be observable, but the claim that one kind of creature given enough time becomes a totally different kind of creature is pure speculation, thus faith. It leaves the realm of fact and science and enters religion and faith.
miamidan44 1 year ago
@miamidan44 No, it's not speculation or faith. First of all, it's logical that many small changes over time makes a new species. Second, we have proof that it has happened. Every test preformed shows that animals evolved into different species. It doesn't have to be directly observed to know it happens, especially when we can observe it in the fossil record if you really want to see how it happened. None of it is speculation, you simply either do not understand or choose to ignore the evidence.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 "it's logical that many small changes over time makes a new species." If by "new species" you mean one creature becoming a completely different creature (a cell into a fish...into an ape-like creature...into a man for instance) over whatever number of years you want to throw in, then yes, it is speculation. "Every test preformed shows that animals evolved into different species." Such as? "we can observe it in the fossil record" again, such as?
miamidan44 1 year ago
@miamidan44 You seem to have a very bad understanding of what evolution is. The creatures we came from were fish-like, but they weren't what we classify to be fish today, and we never stopped being ape-like. We are still apes and will always be in the ape category. We didn't go from ape to man, we became a type of ape called man. As for tests, look at dog breeders. They make different types of dogs, selecting for certain traits. As for the fossil record, go look it up. Don't be lazy.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@miamidan44 If you're going to continue to argue this out with me, I'd advise you send me private messages. Arguing here will just clutter the comments and limit how much we can say.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago
@genobahamut1337 - Evolution is not fact-the big bang is called a theroy for good reason. It takes more faith to beleive in Evolution than creation, because you have to beleive nothing exploded and here we are.
TheBiblestudyman 1 year ago
@TheBiblestudyman Uhg... You know, I'd prefer not to deal with your brand of stupid. Go look up evolution and the big bang and find out what they actually are... While you're at it, look up what a scientific theory is and stop bothering me with mindless lines you've been taught to fire out. You're not impressing anyone.
genobahamut1337 1 year ago 7
@genobahamut1337 Geno, don't you get tired of explaining simple scientific concepts like: hypothesis, peer-review, theory etc. !?!?!? It's almost like people intentionally make one explain theory over & over & over just to confuse the debate because they don't want creationism to be examined....because if it was, it would collapse under the weight of it's own implausibility. If I have to hear: "This or that is only a theory" again, I'm gonna hurl..sigh....
orangemod 10 months ago
@orangemod I know what you mean...
genobahamut1337 10 months ago
@genobahamut1337 Well said!
tru7hs 7 months ago
you are wrong
cbernier3 2 years ago
I love Brian Cox!
carolinelandry75 2 years ago
Interesting...
CaptainAgnostic 2 years ago
I think people like gundamfreak4 saw the word "creation" in the title of this video and clicked on it.
Another annoying fundamentalist, what an awful trick we played on him.
VesusSheist 2 years ago 7
Gundamfreak4, the word "gh" used in Isaiah 40:22 means "circle", not "sphere". Hebrew had another word for sphere, "rwd".
The Bible clearly describes the earth as a flat, circular disk supported by pillar-like foundations and covered by a solid, gated firmament holding back the waters of the cosmos.
This cosmology is the standard ancient near eastern view of the universe and it is highly unlikely the ancient Judahites and Israelites believed the earth was spherical.
steevmac 2 years ago 3
The stila found at Tel Dan proves only the existence of a dynasty founded by David. It does not prove the veracity of biblical prophecy, and it certainly does not prove the existence of a creator.
Evolution has mountains of evidence which now includes molecular genetic evidence indicating the interrelatedness of all species. This is the same type of evidence that courts rely on to prove the paternity of a child.
The theory of evolution is not disproved by the discovery of King David's dynasty.
steevmac 2 years ago 2
@steevmac what? mountains of evidence? or mountain of lies? have u heard about the hoax of darwins missing links? 50 yrs after they presented it, it was found out that they used a bones of ape and bones of a human, tried to fit it and bwala!! there your greatest lie... when scientist inquired 4 the peking man bone suppoesedly a new discovery the hid it and never shown again in the media.. have u read yahoo news lately, astronomers discoverd universe has the same temp, evrywhre, no big bang hapnd
ouano1 2 years ago
Comment removed
Einsteinian99 2 years ago
Yes, there really IS mountains of evidence if you'll care to look at it in any science museum archive. You're thinking about Piltdown Man which was an early hoax (not Peking Man). One hoax out of literally thousands of real fossils does nothing to damage the evidence for evolution.
In fact it is now silly talking about a gap or a "missing link" because as soon as a potential intermediate fossil is found, the evolution-deniers say that the number of gaps doubles!!!
wabawoba 2 years ago 2
Thanks wabawoba, couldnt have put it better myself. Actually Peking Man was NOT a hoax & is now classified as "Homo erectus".
The "missing links" that we now have show, if lined up, an almost unbroken change of skull shape from the chimpanzee-like Australopithecus afarensis, through Austrolopithecus africanus, Homo habilis, Homo rudolphensis, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, to Homo sapiens.
steevmac 2 years ago
@ouano1
That's a lot of ignorance in one post.
Piltdown man was a hoax exposed by Scientists--a very competitive bunch who still agree conclusively on the truth of evolution as fact and theory.
If you believe the earth is round, or in germ theory, or heliocentrism, then you've already accepted science's many discoveries. Evolution is another and with the same mountain of evidence.
celebrationofreason 2 years ago
@ ouano1- Your lack of basic understanding amazes me. Please, educate yourself on the matter before you attempt to discredit it.
genobahamut1337 2 years ago
There's no such thing as "evolving higher". Evolution works by adapting an organism to its ENVIRONMENT not to some higher ideal. If a particular feature ceases to be a necessity for survival or if we stop needing it (like a tail or the instinct to avoid storms) it'll disappear.
There are species of troglobitic animals (who evolved in dark caves) who have lost their skin pigmentation, vision and even lost their eyes altogether.
Your assuptions are simplistic & show a distinct lack of knowledge.
steevmac 2 years ago 4
On behalf of the scientific community, I would like to deeply apologize that current cosmological models conflict with a 2000 year old mythology book(s). We are deeply sorry.
For those who have studied Big Bang cosmology, it is NOT "bs" as they have studied it and performed tests over and over on it. have you? No? Than who are you to critisize?
bttsstewart 2 years ago 4
yeah? too bad it didnt say the world is a sphere huh?
Key2daUnderground 2 years ago
This is the 3rd time I ask you to quote the bible regarding the world being described as a sphere & not a circle. If you cannot, dont bother replying. Don't bother using the poor excuse of Hebrew translation because it will work against you. If it indeed stated sphere & not circle, what other mistakes & mistranslations does the bible carry? If it is so suggestable to error, why take it seriously at all?
Realize that everything you claim can be looked up.
Key2daUnderground 2 years ago 4
40 years old and a professor? It takes a lot to get to professorship in this country.
Uxoriouswidow 2 years ago
Great video.
Reality is so much more awe inspiring than myths.
BoneySkylord 2 years ago
Comment removed
gundamfreak4 2 years ago
Comment removed
gundamfreak4 2 years ago
and also diseases are caused by evil spirits just like the bible says
Dreamerx47 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
gundamfreak4 2 years ago
WHAT!!! ARE YOU SAYING THE BIBLE IS WRONG!!!!! BURN UNBELIEVER BURN!!!!
MUWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
....sorry about that rather sadistic outburst
jesus loves you! but if you dont love him back...
YOULL BURN MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....
but its ok you can choose you have free will and all
Dreamerx47 2 years ago
i've read the bible and it did not say SPHERICAL, it actually said circular which is incorrect. Unless I missed something, why not site your source, which book, chapter & verse?
Key2daUnderground 2 years ago
Comment removed
gundamfreak4 2 years ago
Well gundamfreak4, I'll admit that many Athiests will give videos promoting these topics higher ratings, but it also has to do with the fact that many Creationists on youtube make themselves look really stupid. Many try to discredit science, which has a logical and analytical backing, with religion, something that has no concrete backing besides a few books of self contradictions. You coul argue that its because the bible is the work of man, but then you need to realize that is what you worship.
kamehapa 2 years ago 5
well have you ever considered the fact that we may be right if everything the bible says is true and yes it is look at the evidence your self
gundamfreak4 2 years ago
we have considered it... and we have long since then dismissed it. for centuries Christians have gotten it wrong & the more science we know, the less vadility the Bible has. The Earth revolves around the Sun & not vice versa, the Earth is not flat... we have shot up through Heaven & there ewre no golden gates or angels chilling, we surpassed that & landed on the Moon... we are too advanced to consider such primitive worldviews that have an abundance scientific of evidence to contradict it
Key2daUnderground 2 years ago
ha thats where your wrong the bible dosent say the earth is flat it uses the hebrew word for sphere
gundamfreak4 2 years ago
I got a Bible right here, correct me. Book/Chapter/Verse? But before you continue, circle doesnt equal sphere. I HOPE i dont have to explain the difference...
Key2daUnderground 2 years ago
1) First of all it uses the word for disk or circle, not for sphere or ball
2) Have you considered that any other made up version of a god, heaven or hell could be true?
3) The question is how likely is it based upon the evidence, there's no evidence of heaven, hell or god. All you have are fables from ancient desert cultures with no evidence to validate the claimed miracles and preconceived assumptions that it's true when looking at any evidence.
garith21 2 years ago
This wasn't about evo.
Uxoriouswidow 2 years ago
I cant wait till Christians have no choice but to admit they are wrong. Im so sick of hearing, "if the big bang did happen, who do you think lit the fuse.. GOD DID"
bradzdestroyer 2 years ago 7
VERY FUNNY!!! .....boy does this SOUND familier???????? LOL! (shhhhhhhhhh it's an Inside joke!)
jyoungblood3960 2 years ago
I believe there probably is a creator, but he/she is exactly the same as you, me and the bumbling scientists at CERN, the universe we see and experience was likely to be an experiment by an equally progressive alien race with atoms, particles and quarks, the second we learn to create life we will destroy all present life, similar to hindu ethics, Shiva the destroyer of the world, following Brahma the creator.
VoxJoxx 2 years ago
I'm impressed. Such a cool video, but people worry more about flamewars in the comments. Forget about the creationists, let's talk about the good things of life. =P
SeppukuDoll 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm suprised that TED havent filed a DMCA about this vid. Its good though.
neil73 2 years ago
neil73,
why should they file a DMCA? All their videos a creative commons for noncommercial use.
Best0fScience 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your stupid!
deepwood100 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not only that. The mathematics says there is one complete true church known as Universal, by Christ built in 33 ad.
robotsky8 2 years ago
How does mathematics say that?
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago 3
Not knowing why something happens doesn't negate the observation and evidence backing the event. Here being the Big Bang.
P90XDoubles 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Religion asserts wisdom. The fact is that religion had produced many great men like st. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Augustin. Their wisdom and intelligence in logic is far too great and they explain the Dogma base on logic and reasoning. Religion is not JUST faith. The evidence both supernatural and historical is not just extraordinarily compelling not equal to manipulated bones and proven inaccuracy of radiometric dating.
robotsky8 2 years ago
What historical and supernatural evidence?
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago
and it produces dumbcunts like you.
minborox 2 years ago
I think just BECAUSE humanity can't get their 'act' together we need to expand into the universe.
We have the knowledge mostly, but noone want to take the first step unless they see a pile of gold in the other end.
We know most of the building blocks to terraform planets. Only that by todays methods it would take a huge amount of time. But we have the means to mine and harvest minerals, and by far the most important thing, water. We are actually using it up. It disappears from our planet.
BelieveNoGod 2 years ago
How are we running out of water? I can understand running out of fresh water, leaving only salt water which can be filtered, but water in general? The only way I can think of for that to happen is if we're running out of hydrogen somehow.
genobahamut1337 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Actually the laws of physics points against naturalism. Nature cannot and will never create itself. Because if it did then It must have itself first before creating it. The natural processes you see in the nebulae which creates stars via natural process isn't really the key creation of the universe. This goes back to rather what created the big bang in this fairytale. As sexual reproduction is impossible if there's no supernatural creation started it to have body for the process.
robotsky8 2 years ago
Man, I really wonder when creationists will finally get that the big bang is not a creation of matter, just the changing state of it. Your comment shows that you don't understand the facts, the position of science or that you even watched this video and paid any attention. You aren't having a conversation, you're rambling, so please stop it. Learn the position you oppose before you make a statement against it, because you just come across as ignorant. Thank you, and no offense intended.
alooflikearobot 2 years ago 4
Actually the vid made it clear that matter came afterwards, there was only highly condensed energy before the BB.
Uxoriouswidow 2 years ago
I call REALITY FAIL on you too!
The laws of physics points DIRECTLY to "naturalism", look at the First Law of Thermodynamics:
energy can be transformed (changed from one form to another), but cannot be created or destroyed.
Before the Big Bang energy (matter) was crunched into an point of singularity, it existed so it was never created nor destroyed. A supernatural being would not only break the first law of thermodynamics, thus I call REALITY FAIL on you!
ozpowermo 2 years ago 2
Sexual reproduction does not necessarily reqire sexual organs. Early cells could have reproduced sexually by conjoined together, mixing genes, and then spliting a part into more cells. With the increased genetic variation the cells would have been able to evolve much more quickly eventually leading to sexual reproduction as we know it today.
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago 2
They use pilli, which are sexual apendages.
Uxoriouswidow 2 years ago
Personally, this makes more sense than the idea that something that created Hitler created everything is a week. I guess this is for people capable of critical thinking and are competent enough to question things.
Oranginator77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This man is lying. "We know that universe started 13.7 billion years ago" with a silly picture along with the frigging WMAP satellite. This is not true! The answer is, "No." No one knows how old the universe is or how it's been created and any scientists agrees with this assertion. 13.7 billion years is based on the fairy tale big bang which is a long natural process IE without God in it. So don't take it literally and believe the young earth until there's really no evidence for evolution.
robotsky8 2 years ago
And how do you know that we don't know the age of the universe? How much research have you done into the claims and what reasoning they used to come to such conclusions? Really there is NO evidence for evolution? How do you know this? Do you posses some sort of omnisciency that I do not? If so what are you doing on youtube? Surely you could find a better media for spreading your vast wealth of knowledge for the betterment of man kind.
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago
You're not open minded. Scientists can accept , they don't know. Yes of course I know carbon dating simply is accepted as being inaccurate and not really measure any age at all. It would not be rational to say earth is 4.5 billion years old while presenting few rare little stones and some manipulated bones of homo Sapiens.
robotsky8 2 years ago
How am I not open minded? I have not denied any substantiated claim that you have put forth. I can accept that I do not know some things. I don't know how matter came into existance. I don't know how photons or gravitons work or how they are able appear and vanish into empty space. Being open minded means you take in all the facts available and form a conclusion on them regardless of personal bias.
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago
I have researched the facts both for and against evolution and the big bang and have made my conclusion as to there validity. If there was evidence that blatantly contradicted either theory I would try to find a new one that could account for all of the evidence. As of yet this has not happened unless there is something that I am unaware of and if such is true please share your tid bit of information with me
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago
NO EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION???? BULLSHIT!!! There is scientific proof of evolution! Yet there is no scientific proof of any "God". So tell me, if your "God" created everything, why did it create Hitler? Keep in mind, Jesus was a Jew according to the bible(which is the most widely know Jewish Zombie fairy tale).
Oranginator77 2 years ago 2
Briliiant!, if it was legal to marry a machine, I would marry the LHC ! :)
1BustedMyth 2 years ago