@FinMilkku sorry, there are lots of errors. one of the very first that anyone noticed was that i gave karelia directly to USSR. someday when i make a new map, i will fix it!
@RobotN001 yes i did - the US attack on iraq is an arrow pointing up into iraq from saudi arabia, and is accompanied by a civil war 'double arrow'; the afghan invasion arrow disappears after 2001 and is replaced by a double arrow signifying a new afghan civil war, this may have been a mistake.
@LorenzoLassek i could send you the original, which is higher resolution. the temporal resolution is 1 frame per month, which i think comes through here. i'm going to wait a few years and make a new and improved version...
hey, if kurdistan became free now, would they be cool with the west like turkey is, or would they pull this same bull shit that saudi arabia and iran pull, this jihad fuck crap
well, yeah, but that is only because turkey has been more of a superpower then kurdistan ever was and is. but i don't think that turkey wants to be douchbaggy towards the west, after half of it's country is westernized, the other half is rural and under-industrialized with very little resources
Romania was united with the Republic of Moldova (as well as parts of Ucraine) in the interbelic period. Also, we were involved in a war with Hungary in 1920.
a short war between Romania and Hungary is included in August 1919 - it's hard to see here, a little clearer in my second version "20th Century History with Noise".
i probably got a few dates wrong, and I know Eastern Europe in general was pretty dynamic in those years.
also, Moldova/Bessarabia is correctly assigned here, but the border between the regions doesn't get filled in, so it looks separate...
I did include a flash in early 1990, which saw some important events leading to the end of apartheid. April 1994 probably would have been a better date to represent the change in SA government, though.
1901 ferderation, australia was i mix of territories and state under their own governing body. thats something you missed, australian pre and post federation, 1900-1901. so instead of changin colour it should have changed from states to a nations
all represented in one way or another either with little invader-colored arrows or with blue flashes. Iran is an odd one in your list, never having been attacked by the US. it was invaded by the UK and USSR in 1941, the government was overthrown 3 times last century: 1926, 1953, and 1979.
it may be hard to see, but there is a little america-colored arrow pointing into iraq starting in march 2003 (happy 6th anniversary, iraq war!) right up through the end of the presentation.
countries like canada, austrialia, and new zealand are in deed independent however those three countries are still represented by the queen of england, she is the head of state of canada austrlia, new zealand, jamaica, fiji and so on. You guys do Govern yourself but your still britains bitch. You should be more like the US, india , guyana, kenya, malayasia who broke away from the british empire and became self govering republics that has a president which run things and not a prime minster!
I dont think you fully know what you talking about, i live in new zealand. Yes by paper she is "head of state" but no one bows down to her. We sing "God Defend New Zealand" not "God save the Queen".
She has power, but she hasnt been her for many many years, she is there so she can shutdown goverment so things like distatorships cannot comeinto power.
Their system works fine. As does the United States' system. Not sure about those other guys...
Really in the end a President and a Prime Minister mean little is different. There's essentially two types of Democracy in the world, American democracy and British democracy. American Democracy is based off British Democracy and off the old Roman senate.
i had trouble figuring out clear 'dates of independence' for places like australia and canada. seemed kind of gradual to my reading, but i don't know. what day/month/year would you suggest?
'aggression' and 'response' both appear as little flickering arrows in my program; and since the georgia-russia thing was so fast, and my program just uses a 1-month resolution, the war would show up as two very brief arrows, simultaneously. you'd barely notice it if i did put it in, but i will someday, just for you.
This may be a simple-minded question. But I have not heard an answer to that yet, simple-minded or otherwise. How many people are being paid for doing sociology?
i noticed the parts of the british empire were pink, but australia wasnt? also britain owned eygpt in ww2 and the middle east, which is gained between the wars
i made australia independent in 1901 with the promulgation of the constitution. on this basis, maybe canada should have been independent in 1867, but the canadian process seemed more gradual to me. these cases are less clear cut than outright 'declarations of independence'.
also, egypt gained independence from britain in 1922 i think, though they were still to some extent 'occupied' by the british, and still had no control over Suez.
they remain technically backward, their greatest achievement so far is the construction of the pyramids and that was in pharaonic times...lol, thats a consequence of their national religion
I think this is brilliant. So there might be very minor problems, but seriously if you are looking for dates go get a book, if you are looking for a great overview of the most violent century in history, here's your resource.
I think this is a very important thing you've done. A century of global history compressed into minutes makes geo-politics wiggle. I'm a teacher who believes that all history is culturally determined opinion based upon propagandistic half-truths and outright lies. If there was a program to make an historical time lapse like this without all the work, I'd buy it. Get ten professors to make one with their own focus and viewpoint -- you could watch them all in less than an hour. Wow!
Iran will stand forever. I am sure that the US and Israel will attack in Iran at this summer, But it would be the end of american empire, not the Iranian people. Regime will change,but the country will rerise up as the sun, after a long dark night ...
I hope someone stop Bush before, becouse we could not stop Ahmadinejad!!
Using Nukes in war against Iran or syria, will open the battle fields in all middle-east and Islamic countries, then a new world war will start.
The russian defence technology is quiet enough for the American military technology. And arthur or excalibur won't be usefull, becouse they will not be able to land on Iran's territories.
And this time there is more than 150,000 american soldier in Iraq and afganistan, and Iran can be too close to them!
A local war in the middle east with Israel+USA vs some islamic states is not a world war. It will be a walkover and soon when the west and china stops using oil your whole area will revert backwards to its natural primitive state.
Russian tech is 20-30 years behind.
ARTHUR will locate all ground based launches and the reply will be airborne before the detected rounds land. Excalibur reaches 57km and HITS what it is aimed at.
So, any Iranian units detected within 57 km from US artillery = dead.
iran and north korea want nukes then usa wants war and puts a ban on importing ipods to north korea (since that korean in charge likes apple products)
and abouth russian tech...
even if the russians were 30years behind (they arent, their icbm missed the target for 2m after flying over 15000 km), they got 5000+nukes that go at the speed mach10, while the american missles that are used on missle shields against nukes go between mach 5 and 7
country by country-afghanistan is only a country away from china and the chinese are already kinda pissed about that taiwan thing
p.s. wtf does america have to send its army all round the world, cant they keep it within their borders?-they would gain both money and popularity in the world
money from lesser military budget and popularity since they wont be known as those morons that cant find themselves on a map and go round steal... liberatin oil
Well, I would think that from Chinas point of view it would be better to have the US invade and try to "democratize" Iran then to have a nuclear war with USA with assured MAD.
Get educated about the Neocons and their "new world order". It is not a conspiracy, it is official policy.
you think that obama or hillary clinton or whoever wins will say lets go to war after putin says guys, that's enough...
nuke threats work both ways
and you think russia doesnt want all that oil there?
and there is a stupis thing about america-they say they're not going to war against muslims, then they make those names like crusade against the axis of evil
i would wonder whos evil here-the guys that kidnap its own other countries citizens or the ones that go horracing their own citizens only
It doesn't matter who become the US president, NWO rules all. (except Ron Paul of course)
Yes, nukes threats go both ways, that's MAD (mutual assured destruction). And what that means is that no one can use nukes on another country who has them, or make threats about launching their nukes, because that would be suicide.
Look at the cold war. Both sides had thousands of nukes, but what really mattered was feet on the ground, planes in the air and technical advancements.
Scurck speaks the truth. Also, think about one fact. The US has 8 nuclear subs, each with the firepower of 80% of the entire world. People in the US are trying to stop the NeoCons which INCLUDE Hillary, Obama, and McCain (they are the same).
Iranians ARE a people, you have seen just 100 years of our history, in more than 2000 years of our history almost all neighbour contries, england, russia, portugal attacked to Iran, but iran is still stand. I am a Azeri (azerbaijani) and I am deeply feel an Iranian.
The US did not flash because its people are complacent sheep that have no individual thought. Americans believe their media and every word their government says. I trully hope the masses of Americans who are asleep wake up. Life is more than American Idol, SUVs, Football, Nikes, and Mc Donald's.
the world should be just one color as there is only a handful of families that own it. such as the relatives of bushes, the royals of england. rockefellers and their relatives the rothschilds that own the dollar and euro money units and all oil corporations of the world+ the UN + all govts under it. etc. anyway, nice work if u did this, favorited.
Comment removed
Trofimov174 4 months ago
this map is not correct. for example you didn't put Karelia and Petsamo for Finland from 1917 to WW2.
FinMilkku 4 months ago
@FinMilkku sorry, there are lots of errors. one of the very first that anyone noticed was that i gave karelia directly to USSR. someday when i make a new map, i will fix it!
amhaun01 4 months ago
@amhaun01 ok, thanks
FinMilkku 4 months ago
You not show USA operations in Asia.
Iraq, Afgan and others.
RobotN001 6 months ago
@RobotN001 yes i did - the US attack on iraq is an arrow pointing up into iraq from saudi arabia, and is accompanied by a civil war 'double arrow'; the afghan invasion arrow disappears after 2001 and is replaced by a double arrow signifying a new afghan civil war, this may have been a mistake.
amhaun01 6 months ago
i dont get it...
raulalmanza14 8 months ago
too slow to load
francblack 9 months ago
you forgot the indonesian betryal conquest of new-guinea...
blueboy921 1 year ago
Wow. This is amazing. It solidifies my hatred of war.
Elfinesmom 1 year ago
can you try make each continents like this.
Bossky2231 1 year ago
I love how Sweden remains completely unchanged through the whole thing XD
giraki1 1 year ago
wow...
EmperorTigerstar 1 year ago
I love history of the world but it is so complicated!
jimmeng3395 1 year ago
20,000 views! i am a hero!
amhaun01 1 year ago 5
Could you make a slow motion versionin 20 or even 45minutes? And with little written words? In higher qualitiy? ;-)
LorenzoLassek 1 year ago
@LorenzoLassek i could send you the original, which is higher resolution. the temporal resolution is 1 frame per month, which i think comes through here. i'm going to wait a few years and make a new and improved version...
amhaun01 1 year ago
britain dident flash once lol :D
TotalWarLord 1 year ago
@TotalWarLord yes the lat battle there was in the 18th century im think it was 1780 or something
newskippy 1 year ago
so before 1943 vietnam laos and cambidia where 1?
domainalias 1 year ago
@domainalias they were part of french indochina. ( ruled by france)
SHUTUPNOOB654 1 year ago
POLAND! First to fight!!!
borsukv 1 year ago
CHINA AND RUSSIA IS SHRINKING
:D
davidlee110 2 years ago
The state of war in Africa post colonization is so constant and incoherent
DracoMalfoy87 2 years ago
it was an interesting period, very dangerous, very dynamic. except for the DRC it's pretty much cooled off now, we hope...
amhaun01 1 year ago
This is wrong!
U forgot to take Kurdistan in the map!
Kurdistan was a country but after United Kingdom went to Kurdistan it became 4 parts!!
WooTie55 2 years ago
what?
kurt9876543210 2 years ago
hey, if kurdistan became free now, would they be cool with the west like turkey is, or would they pull this same bull shit that saudi arabia and iran pull, this jihad fuck crap
kurt9876543210 2 years ago
@kurt9876543210 kurdistan would be cool with the west. But u know turkeys isnt cool with the west
WooTie55 2 years ago
well, yeah, but that is only because turkey has been more of a superpower then kurdistan ever was and is. but i don't think that turkey wants to be douchbaggy towards the west, after half of it's country is westernized, the other half is rural and under-industrialized with very little resources
kurt9876543210 2 years ago
the maps almost go into melt down during 1914-1924, with WW1 and the aftermath
1specialperson 2 years ago
Romania was united with the Republic of Moldova (as well as parts of Ucraine) in the interbelic period. Also, we were involved in a war with Hungary in 1920.
romanianb1 2 years ago
a short war between Romania and Hungary is included in August 1919 - it's hard to see here, a little clearer in my second version "20th Century History with Noise".
i probably got a few dates wrong, and I know Eastern Europe in general was pretty dynamic in those years.
also, Moldova/Bessarabia is correctly assigned here, but the border between the regions doesn't get filled in, so it looks separate...
amhaun01 2 years ago
Truelly a great video. I just have to favorite this.
xxxrrrxxxrrr 2 years ago
also u forgot 1991 -mongolia becomes democrat
MongolGenghis 2 years ago
That is really cool video illustrating a really screwed up world.
thimoneus 2 years ago 10
It's hard to follow everything.
TheDcrat 2 years ago
u forgot 1994 - south africa becomes democrat
C17policeforce 2 years ago
I did include a flash in early 1990, which saw some important events leading to the end of apartheid. April 1994 probably would have been a better date to represent the change in SA government, though.
amhaun01 2 years ago
1901 ferderation, australia was i mix of territories and state under their own governing body. thats something you missed, australian pre and post federation, 1900-1901. so instead of changin colour it should have changed from states to a nations
jfsmith881 2 years ago
wow australia id so boring...
grimgor999 2 years ago
3-5=-2
klaatu32 2 years ago
Comment removed
bambalambam 2 years ago
США на месте все время простояла)))
А еще говорят это мы во 2 мировую всех пиздили)))
Pycich 2 years ago
silence, commie
lamparalaptopiaguita 2 years ago
look at US... nothing:)
rafalprelude13 2 years ago
actually, there are very brief (1-month) arrows pointing at: hawaii in Dec 1941, and NYC in Sept 2001.
amhaun01 2 years ago
What about Nagasaki, Hiroshima, Cambodia, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Iran.
peternubreed 2 years ago
all represented in one way or another either with little invader-colored arrows or with blue flashes. Iran is an odd one in your list, never having been attacked by the US. it was invaded by the UK and USSR in 1941, the government was overthrown 3 times last century: 1926, 1953, and 1979.
amhaun01 2 years ago
wtf why are there arrows in Sri Lanka?
crzer07 2 years ago
wasn't there was a civil war there until, what, this month?
amhaun01 2 years ago
this is true
SlipknotRule93 2 years ago
wow so many arrows from 1939-1945 lol... and the arrows in Africa are always there.
crzer07 2 years ago 3
Is the invasion of Iraq adequately represented in this map??
b1sII6 2 years ago
it may be hard to see, but there is a little america-colored arrow pointing into iraq starting in march 2003 (happy 6th anniversary, iraq war!) right up through the end of the presentation.
amhaun01 2 years ago
Look at South America..
*blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash* *blue flash*
verxintRising 3 years ago
cool video demonstration
xMiamiMichael 3 years ago
'history is nothing but a point of view.'
ahnamus 3 years ago
countries like canada, austrialia, and new zealand are in deed independent however those three countries are still represented by the queen of england, she is the head of state of canada austrlia, new zealand, jamaica, fiji and so on. You guys do Govern yourself but your still britains bitch. You should be more like the US, india , guyana, kenya, malayasia who broke away from the british empire and became self govering republics that has a president which run things and not a prime minster!
Bronxguyanese 3 years ago
she is basically just symbolism
893160007 3 years ago
I dont think you fully know what you talking about, i live in new zealand. Yes by paper she is "head of state" but no one bows down to her. We sing "God Defend New Zealand" not "God save the Queen".
She has power, but she hasnt been her for many many years, she is there so she can shutdown goverment so things like distatorships cannot comeinto power.
But no one even takes any notice of her.
PEACE
korahaplayas 3 years ago
Their system works fine. As does the United States' system. Not sure about those other guys...
Really in the end a President and a Prime Minister mean little is different. There's essentially two types of Democracy in the world, American democracy and British democracy. American Democracy is based off British Democracy and off the old Roman senate.
verxintRising 3 years ago
Why is canada british we gained our independence long before the 1900s
SirKillalot33 3 years ago
i had trouble figuring out clear 'dates of independence' for places like australia and canada. seemed kind of gradual to my reading, but i don't know. what day/month/year would you suggest?
amhaun01 3 years ago
Statute of Westminster, 1931
rufo3 2 years ago
yea whatever. no country is better than any other country.
its sad how the world is.
really.
why did adam eat the apple. jesus christ.
sonofscars 3 years ago
Everything in pink is the British Empire, the greatest Empire known to man!!!GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!!
LordWellington15 3 years ago
10,000, yes! i am a hero!
amhaun01 3 years ago
that is by far the fastest time I've seen the second WW go past
disaster323 3 years ago
Its gonna need to be updated for the Georgian Agression to South Ossetia and Abkhazia in the cauacases.
Kyzersawsay 3 years ago
'aggression' and 'response' both appear as little flickering arrows in my program; and since the georgia-russia thing was so fast, and my program just uses a 1-month resolution, the war would show up as two very brief arrows, simultaneously. you'd barely notice it if i did put it in, but i will someday, just for you.
amhaun01 3 years ago
Very true.
Kyzersawsay 3 years ago
"Why can't we all get along?"
----Rodney King in 1992
This may be a simple-minded question. But I have not heard an answer to that yet, simple-minded or otherwise. How many people are being paid for doing sociology?
Did any of them do any real work yet?
tyhsupe 3 years ago
ROFL, they got no real employment after their PhDs, science and technology people usually do, although not usually on the intended field
kubikmaster 3 years ago
i noticed the parts of the british empire were pink, but australia wasnt? also britain owned eygpt in ww2 and the middle east, which is gained between the wars
turdpolish704 3 years ago
i made australia independent in 1901 with the promulgation of the constitution. on this basis, maybe canada should have been independent in 1867, but the canadian process seemed more gradual to me. these cases are less clear cut than outright 'declarations of independence'.
also, egypt gained independence from britain in 1922 i think, though they were still to some extent 'occupied' by the british, and still had no control over Suez.
amhaun01 3 years ago
but they were technically part of the empire during the wars etc..
turdpolish704 3 years ago
they remain technically backward, their greatest achievement so far is the construction of the pyramids and that was in pharaonic times...lol, thats a consequence of their national religion
kubikmaster 3 years ago
i just had an urge to clear the palate of the comment list. that's all.
amhaun01 3 years ago
"Statute of Westminster 1931", providing for Canadian sovereignty on equal terms with the UK.
amhaun01 3 years ago
I think this is brilliant. So there might be very minor problems, but seriously if you are looking for dates go get a book, if you are looking for a great overview of the most violent century in history, here's your resource.
fyfman 4 years ago
It's so fast I don't understand all ! lol
KetuR67SanG 4 years ago
It's wars happend.
XiongHuns 4 years ago
fucking idiot
PUSHKINcXYEM 4 years ago
whats happening i dont understand
WaterrLanDs 4 years ago
I think this is a very important thing you've done. A century of global history compressed into minutes makes geo-politics wiggle. I'm a teacher who believes that all history is culturally determined opinion based upon propagandistic half-truths and outright lies. If there was a program to make an historical time lapse like this without all the work, I'd buy it. Get ten professors to make one with their own focus and viewpoint -- you could watch them all in less than an hour. Wow!
jnotsorich 4 years ago
YAY go Australia no changes, 200years no trouble.
djm4eva 4 years ago
lol..iran is the longest standing nation.. 2000 years..
sexdrugsRnR 4 years ago
But not for much longer! Hehehe. >:D
Scurck 4 years ago
Iran will stand forever. I am sure that the US and Israel will attack in Iran at this summer, But it would be the end of american empire, not the Iranian people. Regime will change,but the country will rerise up as the sun, after a long dark night ...
I hope someone stop Bush before, becouse we could not stop Ahmadinejad!!
Peace
I hope Bush
effelunga 4 years ago
Forever is a bold claim. Especially against Israeli nukes, Swedish Excalibur artillery and the vast American tactical superiority.
Iranians are not a people, it is a nationality. Iran will be broken down into parts based on ethicity. So hello Persia and Kurdistan. =)
Scurck 4 years ago
Using Nukes in war against Iran or syria, will open the battle fields in all middle-east and Islamic countries, then a new world war will start.
The russian defence technology is quiet enough for the American military technology. And arthur or excalibur won't be usefull, becouse they will not be able to land on Iran's territories.
And this time there is more than 150,000 american soldier in Iraq and afganistan, and Iran can be too close to them!
effelunga 4 years ago
A local war in the middle east with Israel+USA vs some islamic states is not a world war. It will be a walkover and soon when the west and china stops using oil your whole area will revert backwards to its natural primitive state.
Russian tech is 20-30 years behind.
ARTHUR will locate all ground based launches and the reply will be airborne before the detected rounds land. Excalibur reaches 57km and HITS what it is aimed at.
So, any Iranian units detected within 57 km from US artillery = dead.
Scurck 4 years ago
ok, israel got nukes
iran and north korea want nukes then usa wants war and puts a ban on importing ipods to north korea (since that korean in charge likes apple products)
and abouth russian tech...
even if the russians were 30years behind (they arent, their icbm missed the target for 2m after flying over 15000 km), they got 5000+nukes that go at the speed mach10, while the american missles that are used on missle shields against nukes go between mach 5 and 7
greedybastard0 3 years ago
Well, ICBMs are a fairly old technology.
And I do not see what that has got to do with the discussion at hand. Iran will not be using ICBMs...
Scurck 3 years ago
well you think rissians are just gonna eat popcorn and bet on the fight that relatively close to them?
they cancelled that contract about conventional weapons in europe after the usa installed the missle shield in ceska
greedybastard0 3 years ago
So what are they gonna do? Threaten the US with nukes?
No, russia will most likley silently applaud a US invasion of Iran. Where do you think the Chechens have been supported from?
Scurck 3 years ago
then you got china or whoever
there are more powerful countries on earth then one
greedybastard0 3 years ago
Will they risk a nuclar war with the US over such a small thing as Iran? I don't think so...
Scurck 3 years ago
iran a small thing...
country by country-afghanistan is only a country away from china and the chinese are already kinda pissed about that taiwan thing
p.s. wtf does america have to send its army all round the world, cant they keep it within their borders?-they would gain both money and popularity in the world
money from lesser military budget and popularity since they wont be known as those morons that cant find themselves on a map and go round steal... liberatin oil
greedybastard0 3 years ago 2
Well, I would think that from Chinas point of view it would be better to have the US invade and try to "democratize" Iran then to have a nuclear war with USA with assured MAD.
Get educated about the Neocons and their "new world order". It is not a conspiracy, it is official policy.
Scurck 3 years ago
you think that obama or hillary clinton or whoever wins will say lets go to war after putin says guys, that's enough...
nuke threats work both ways
and you think russia doesnt want all that oil there?
and there is a stupis thing about america-they say they're not going to war against muslims, then they make those names like crusade against the axis of evil
i would wonder whos evil here-the guys that kidnap its own other countries citizens or the ones that go horracing their own citizens only
greedybastard0 3 years ago
It doesn't matter who become the US president, NWO rules all. (except Ron Paul of course)
Yes, nukes threats go both ways, that's MAD (mutual assured destruction). And what that means is that no one can use nukes on another country who has them, or make threats about launching their nukes, because that would be suicide.
Look at the cold war. Both sides had thousands of nukes, but what really mattered was feet on the ground, planes in the air and technical advancements.
Scurck 3 years ago
and who could throw more money into the flames
btw, what was that thing about your god can not see or hear, there is no religeous war at hand
greedybastard0 3 years ago
Scurck speaks the truth. Also, think about one fact. The US has 8 nuclear subs, each with the firepower of 80% of the entire world. People in the US are trying to stop the NeoCons which INCLUDE Hillary, Obama, and McCain (they are the same).
pantadon 3 years ago
Iranians ARE a people, you have seen just 100 years of our history, in more than 2000 years of our history almost all neighbour contries, england, russia, portugal attacked to Iran, but iran is still stand. I am a Azeri (azerbaijani) and I am deeply feel an Iranian.
effelunga 4 years ago
Iranian = nationality
Azeri = ethnicity
Scurck 4 years ago
I know what I am !
effelunga 4 years ago
why didnt the US flash?
gw2005 4 years ago
The US did not flash because its people are complacent sheep that have no individual thought. Americans believe their media and every word their government says. I trully hope the masses of Americans who are asleep wake up. Life is more than American Idol, SUVs, Football, Nikes, and Mc Donald's.
GDLMexBoy 4 years ago
the world should be just one color as there is only a handful of families that own it. such as the relatives of bushes, the royals of england. rockefellers and their relatives the rothschilds that own the dollar and euro money units and all oil corporations of the world+ the UN + all govts under it. etc. anyway, nice work if u did this, favorited.
3swoosh2 4 years ago
it's nice.
retort27 5 years ago
Fascinating! Wonderful job!
songmarysmith 5 years ago