Added: 2 years ago
From: minnesotachris
Views: 28,063
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (388)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This man is an absolute kOoK.

  • Look at how many more problems his policies would probably cause. New York will be Nuked first. Maybe L.A. ??? Go Ron Paul?????

  • It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"

    PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.

    IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !

    WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste and vote up this everywhere.

  • here is the actual plan. Looks pretty good: c3244172.r72.cf0.rackcdn.com/w­p-content/uploads/2011/10/Rest­oreAmericaPlan (dot) pdf

  • So he would rather gamble with a insane dictatorship like Saddam Husseins that might nuke Israel and kill millions of people?i would vote for a republican guy.

  • Ron Paul 2012!!!!

  • seems to me that ron paul is the only person in that room who understands economics, and a monetary system

  • Ron Paul 2012!

  • @RonPaullHatesBlacks very intelligent comment.

  • He had me until he say that the banks having to much freedom was not a problem we anyone with a brain knows it was, but other than that i agree with it all and this is coming from a very liberal dem.

  • These words right here ladies and gents are PROPHETIC! I'm so scared we're going to look back at this video five year from now just nodding our heads, saying to ourselves why did no one actually stand up and truly support this man!? We MUST act this fall, and we must act in 12' - RP 2012!!!

  • ron paul needs to start an official 3rd party

  • There is only one politician who gives me hope and that is Ron Paul. I really don't understand how this guy is not the president. It only takes an ounce of intelligence to recognize the common sense views he puts forth. Just look at his track record, that speaks volumes...

    But then again - most Americans are so dumbified (blame it on sub-par education) that the real power brokers in Washington will always get their way...

    They control the media & education system = Game Over America

  • @orkhun2023 I hate to admit that I agree with you. Don't forget, however, that the real powerbrokers in Washington are not satisfied in bankrupting Americans only, but have a much larger agenda to globalize all sovereign nations into internationally regulated states. The NAU will victimize you Canadinas just as much, if not more, than we Americans. We seem to be in the same boat, my friend. Where do we go from here?

  • ron paul is great, but i'm wondering anyone in congress is actually listening and supporting him. sad...

  • Barack Obama is supposed to be a liberal.

    Liberals tend to be against war.

    He campaigned on a a slogan of "change"

    Ron Paul points out that foreign policy has not changed.

    I wonder why.

  • b/c Obama's whole campaign was a fraud....

  • be carefull

    "CHANGE" "FREEDOM" and all these stuped rantings is what gets followers.

    I could also scream "we need freedom" and i'll also get Cheers!

    this guy never said what he WILL do if more & more poeple loose their jobs

  • Ron Paul is so funny....he still does'nt realize that everyone in the room is in corporation's pockets....and he sounds like a good boy scout....because HE IS. But, everyone else in congress...wants him to shut the FUCK UP....before he ruins thier financial success of RAPE AND ROB THE U.S....MAKE THAT MONEY....AND MAKE US INDEPENDENT ON THEM SO THEY CAN CONTROLL US.

  • @blldgs101 Uhhhhhhh ya he does moron

  • @blldgs101 Register Republican to vote for him in the primary. You can always vote for the other guy (Democrat or Republican) if he doesn't win the nomination. Let's make it happen!

  • keep internet alive

  • am i the only doesn't care if ron paul is a racist or not

  • Youre not a racist. Only a racist focuses on racism, not patriotism, liberty or America.

  • yes

  • Well im Mexican so i care.

  • The more I listen to Ron Paul, the more I learn. And he's DEAD RIGHT!

  • Ron Paul is brillant.

  • I agree. He says what every thinking person in the US would say if they had the platform.

  • wow. he is SO RIGHT! I can't believe FINALLY a politician who is telling IT LIKE IT IS!

  • GO RON PAUL!!

    SAVE AMERICA!!

  • Comment removed

  • When are people to wake up and start listening to this guy. When it's too late?

  • Its already too late sadly

  • Madrox145:

    No it's not too late yet.

    People are beginning to start waking up.

    Notice how a lot of mainstream Republicans who shunned him last year are now beginning to listen because they're beginning to see that he was right. He's gaining ground with independents who're VERY libertarian minded. He's the only current Republican any Democrats & liberals trust and who tempts them away from economic liberalism. That's how POWERFUL the draw of the libertarian message is: It converts ALL types.

  • I agree with your almost 100%, because that is what ive found so amazing about libertarian's myself. My girlfriend for example was a far-left nut job till i showed her were libertarians were on each issue and she now hates dems lol. Anyway the main problem I see though is...you will NEVER convince the "christian-right" to vote for somebody like Ron Paul. They make up a big voting block, and they only vote on "moral issues". Its really sad, cause they refuse to listen to reason.

  • That definition is right in the way that any Christian that does vote for Ron Paul doesn't belong to the "christian-right" in that definition...

    I don't understand either why my fellow christians hang so much to world power. Jesus stayed clear of the state.

  • I disagree. I'm a Christian and I voted for Dr. Paul in the primaries and would have voted for him if he'd made it to the general election. Dr. Paul is sort of the best of both worlds and appeals to Christians and non-Christians alike.

  • Well of course some christians voted for him, but my point was that many are hardcore about certain issues... and they represent a big voteing block for the GOP. He (for example) could care less if gays get married, wants to legalize drugs, wants to legalize prostition, etc. So regardless of how great his polices are on the economy, foreign policy, etc...he looses there votes based on the other issues. Look at Iowa were the first primaries are held...huge christian turnout for repubicans.

  • im an atheist and i voted for ron paul :)

  • Good job. See, we have some common ground. :-)

  • @PatsBlog I think writing him in would have given a clearer message to Democrat and Republican alike. It's what I did anyway; I've never been one to buy that 'leser of two evils' rhetoric anyway. One should always vote his conscience and stand up for what is right.

  • Right On!

  • hurray!

  • You want to take our Government back and get rid of the Federal Reserve and save our Dollar and get our Industries back and restore our Government so it is working for its people again and NOT Wall Street and Privet Bankers? Google video; Ron Paul what every patriot should know.

  • Ron Paul is suddenly looking more attractive and less nutty.

  • Thanks for posting... More about what Dr. Paul is always great info.

    Thanks Congressman Paul for fighting so hard while we were asleep for so many years.

    If you can help or live in the Shenandoah Valley come to our site at shenandoahmilitia (dot) wordpress (dot) com and help us grow and get ready.

    ..

  • If you think Ron Paul is racist for voting against a Martin Luther King Holiday, then you fundamentally misunderstand Ron Paul. He is the only House Rep with a voting record to match his public statements. He has said since 1976 that he would not vote on any legislation that increased government spending. Needless to say he has kept his word. It doesn't matter if it is money to help kids without legs or cute abandoned kittens, this man is famously nicknamed: "Dr. No" and that is his answer.

  • It's unfortunate that so many blacks think that the dissent against Obama is a racial issue. For the vast vast majority of people, it is not. That's not to deny that real racists exist. Have you watched the youtube video "NAACP Director comes to Ron Paul's Defense" ?

  • Correct.

    Even if Obama was as colorless as Clinton, I'd still oppose his borrowing of money from our children and grandchildren (the ones who will pay-off our debt).

  • FYI for those interested:

    HR 20, or the bill that forces all women that just gave birth to take a test to prove their sanity, is about to be voted on again on the House floor.

    Back in 2007, this passed in the House with only 3 nays, Ron Paul was one of those nays.

    It died in the Senate, but is back again.

    How would you like to be a mother that just gave birth, but you can't have your child because you failed a multiple choice test you took seconds after your birth???

  • Rhodes Round Table consist of:

    RIIA, CFR, Bilderberg Group, UN, Trilateral Commission , Club of Rome controlling

    Shadow Govts Britain, US and most countries of the World.

    All PUPPETS OF Club Rome and The "Black" Pope Jesuit General.

    13th Century Law from the Pope gave ownership of the planet to the Catholic

    Church. Jesuits took over the Vatican. Rothschild is their financial arm,

    Rockefeller controls US MIC Military Industrial Complex, Zionist MSM control Media.

    NWO=OWN Satanic Monopoly.

  • My friend, you are clueless on this subject. The fact that we can talk on the internet over computers is due to people taking "risk". How do YOU think capitolism works? For one thing, they risk their OWN money, or that of venture capitol. Most people setting out to make something of themselves risk their OWN money to make it. Hense the word RISK. If it were debtor borrowing, there would be no risk would there? You risk your own money to make money, that's how people make themselves.

  • Global Warming is the biggest scheme in history, you don't need to be a scientist to know this. GB is a way to scare people, later tax them to "curve" gas emissions, what a crock. And Ron Paul is no racist, even ask the NAACP leader that came to his aid in an online interview. BTW, Ron Paul did support the civil rights, but there was no reason for the government to enact this law. Blacks were already protected by the first amendment, all this law did was label blacks as another ethnic group.

  • I live in Los Angeles. Bretwood, Bellair, Beverly Hills area. I know lots of "rich" people. They're just as frugle a penny pincher/saver as a small town saver. The only difference, as you pointed out, they take "risk" with their money. Investing in business ventures etc. You must commend the rich, because we wouldn't have much of the industry we have if it weren't for investers and risk takers. Don't demonize people for having money! You and I have no right to anyone elses money.

  • I... what? I don't understand you. Please explain. Besides, what does it matter if someone is rich or not? Is NOT my money, why am I entitled to someone elses money wether they're rich or poor? Answer: I'm not.

    And yes, I have meet "rich" savers. Lot's of them. Infact, you can't be "rich" unless you save. Wealth, the basses of being "rich", comes from having money. You have to save money to have wealth. You have enough money, you're "rich".

  • the feds are a big greedy monster and the chain that binds them have been removed by a majority of welthy people with no morals, its like there in a fantisy.

    ok its like very insane

  • I bet this went right over Congress's head. Right over...

  • Actually he does represent special interest of White Supramacist groups headed by a southerner named Don Black (founder of hate website 'Stromfront'). Don Black contributed funds to Ron Paul's run for presidency. Another White Supramacist in the mid-west, a guy named Randy Gray was his fundraiser in Michigan.

    Do you think these guys will give out money and expect nothing in return ?

  • They may expect something

    but Ron Paul's not going to give it to them. He cannot be bought since he's near the end of his life, and more interested in preserving his reputation as a non-spender.

  • Voodoo~ President Obama received close to 130K from AIG in 2008 while Senator McCain received close to 60K. (Source: Center for Responsive Politics) RP received no more than 1k from these distasteful organizations;however, it is their right as it is the right of executives from big corporations to donate for the candidate of their choice.

    If you believe that Black and Gray wanted 'favors' in return for their contributions, wouldn't your logic also hold true regarding AIG executives?

  • Actually I'm in favour of exterminating all campaign funds from any interest groups or at least diminish the funding from these interest groups to such a degree that they pose very little danger.

    To achieve that goal there is only two ways to do it. Very large number of individual donations or by public financing (like in Canada and New Zealand)

  • The contributions I spoke of did come from individual donations; however, the individuals belonged to a so-called "special interest group". The problem is that most people belong to some group one way or another. It would be impossible to regulate contributions made by people belonging to 'groups'. People have a right to spend their money the way they see fit.

  • Solution=having honest candidates whose actions speak for themselves. RP's actions never gave people reason to believe that he held the same opinions of some of his campaign donors. Furthermore, RP has a strong voting record. Even if he was the 'frontrunner', and received executive contributions, his supporters would know that he would stay true to his message and vote accordingly. The same is not true for most Presidents and previous Presidential candidates. The truth is astounding.

  • No matter how honest candidate might be they will still need money for campaigning. TV, newspapers and commercial websites dont have obligation to give campaign ad spaces for free. Charter buses and airlines dont have obligations to give candidates free rides to campaign destinations. So many other campaign expenses dont come free.

    Are you living in the real world ?

  • I agree with you regarding the treacherous lobbying and donating for special interest groups. I just don't see how you can regulate it to curb its effects.The solution is to have people with integrity running for office and a very educated and informed voting public.If the public made it abundantly clear that they will not vote for candidates who accept donations on the behalf of the world's largest corporations, perhaps there would be a change.A gov't of the people,by the people,for the people.

  • Actually I like the Canadian approach. Each political party receives about a dollar and 75 cents for every votes they got in the previous election and the receiving party has to reach a minimum of 3 percent of total votes cast to be eligible for such election funds. In addition each individual voters and private corporations cannot donate more than about 1200$ to any individual party therefore political parties are forced to seek and expand voter base as much as possible.

  • At first glance, I'm liking the idea. What do you say to third parties or Independents?

  • Af federal level Canada has 4 political parties Conservative Party of Canada, Liberal Party of Canada, New Democratic Party (a socialist party), The Bloc Québécois (a separatist party) have members elected to the Canadian parliament.

    In 2008 election the Green Party of Canada meet requirement (3% of cast votes) to receive election funding despite the fact they could not elect any members to the parliament.

  • At provincial level (Canada has 10 provinces ) either of three political parties (in some provinces four political parties) usually win and form a government. It is not unusal for a party other than the two biggest parties to win and form a government at provincial level

    There are numerous small political parties such as Communist Party of Canada, Family Values Party, Marijuana Party, Libertarian Party etc participating in the elections at federal level but they never get more than 1% of votes

  • The Canadian process seems fair; however, I will need to look further into it for myself. I appreciate your insight.

  • Actually, Paul has voted in lockstep with David Duke, Stormfront, Vanguard News Network, and the KKK for his entire career. He opposes literally every advancement in the entire history of American civil rights, from the Emancipation Proclamation to the Civil Rights Act to the Voting Rights Act to the MLK holiday. He was the only member to vote to send our tax dollars to fund the genocide in Darfur. The KKK couldn't create a better candidate in a lab. It's no wonder they worked his campaign!

  • And not to mention he wants to tear down 15th and 16th Amendment of the US Constitution (as he said at 2009 CPAC speech). I guess in his view the best way to protect and follow the Constitution is by first tearing down parts of the Constitution itself.

    If you want to protect your body. First chop off parts of your hands and legs I guess.

  • He's not a big fan of the 13th or 14th Amendments, either. He's a real Constitutional defender, all right.

  • That is false.

  • He is not a fan of Reconstruction Amendments anyway.

    Just like Ron Paul everyone has a wish list of Amendments in the Constitution he/she would like to take down.

    I have a wish list of my own. I like to take down 2nd Amendment. I dont like people armed with guns and watching Glenn Beck .

  • RP believes in amending and repealing the Constitution as the Constitution allows via the Congress .The 16th Amendment in RP's view is unconstitutional and believes that a person's wages are better spent by the individual vs. the Gov't. Do you agree or disagree? Regarding the 2nd Amendment, I respect your opinion; however, I believe it to be necessary for the citizens of a free country to be able to defend themselves from a an overreaching government should it ever threaten its people.

  • Just like Ron Paul says it will have unintended consequences .

    If 16th Amendment were to taken down. The states that are net givers in terms of tax dollars can essentially say hey why should we remain in this union of 50 states and pay for net receiver states. Entire West cost , the entire upper mid-west and the north-east states will become independent nations since they are net givers.

  • What did the US do prior to 1913? Why was the country able to stay unionized from 1776 to 1913?

  • Prior to last century these portions of the nation (except the north east) neither had strength in population nor the strength in wealth to make any such argument but they do now.

    California alone now has more than 10% of US population and if California were an independent nation it would make it one of the top 10 richest nation in the world.

  • And ironically these states can use Ron Paul's argument "why should I use my hard earned dollars to go towards someone else who did not earn it ?"

  • Everyone may have a wish list, but everyone is also smart enough not to claim to be some kind of Constitutional champion. That kind of hypocrisy and doublespeak is what gets you laughed at in GOP debates, and 2% of the total primary vote.

  • There are many people who own guns and understand the prudent use of them.

    I'm also ex military, and I also understand the potential for abuse of power.

    The 2nd amendment is very important and should stand.

  • In all of history, genocide happens only in countries with un armed citizens, keep you guns handy! "why?" somebody is trying to kill you, it's your gov in service to the Birtish Empire and the Jesuits, sound crazy> -searh,

    "who is Leo Wanta?"

    and listen to 4/11/09 Int'l Webcast:

    Larpouchepac com

  • Almost everyone is armed with Ak-47s (and many with RPGs) in Afganistan and Somalia.

  • RP spoke of abolishing the 16th and 17th Amendment. No mention of the 15th. What is so bad about repealing them?

  • You wrote, "It would be impossible to regulate contributions made by people belonging to 'groups'. People have a right to spend their money the way they see fit."

    This is exactly the loophole that big corporations and other interest groups have exploited so spectacularly by setting up PACs.

    If you dont like unions you have right to donate to Wal Mart PAC and so does Wal Mart.

    You now cannot complain that Wal Mart PAC hiring lobbyists to influence lawmakers to make laws that favor Wal Mart.

  • thats my boy!!! get em' Ron!!!

  • dstauby:

    NASA says oceans are getting COOLER. What? I thought al gore and the global warming consipritors said they were getting warmer?

    Source: Baltimore Weather Examiner

    Correction: 31,000 scientists

    Go to Petition Project and you will see over 31,000 scientists that agree.

  • Lets see these scientist in video. not some bogus website petition that anyone can goto and sign up.......

    O look, according to Petition Project dstauby is a scientist and says global warming isn't real..... where is the proof?

    Sad republicans will take opposite positions on anything. Including the destruction of our planet.

    Developing renewable energy would somehow destroy our way of life? ROFL, give me some of that your smoking.

  • ROFL, Joe L. Abriola Jr is one of your scientist from pennsylvania. You know, from petition project....... He is, get this....

    The president of a construction company.......... I doubt how valid these people are since that was the first guy I looked into.

    What a tool you are.

  • HAHAHA, This is to much fun. Munawwar M. Akhtar in Pennsylvania is a lawyer.........

    A LAWYER!!!!!!!!

    What an idiot.......

  • I love you Ron Paul.

  • Ron Paul had the most earmarks in one of the latest bills..........

    ROFL.....

  • Link please. Otherwise, I call BS.

  • There is nothing wrong with earmarks. the problem is what the earmarks are for. Each of his earmarks are for his constituents, not special interest groups, like most earmarks are for.

  • Nope nothing wrong at all. unless you rail against socialism. his district gets more in earmarks then it pays in taxes....... GASP.... SOCIALISM!!!!!!

  • Prove it.

  • Not for special interest huh?

    $8 million request for the marketing of wild American shrimp and $2.3 million to fund shrimp-fishing research.

    Do you even bother to research the very people you support?

  • Who do you support?

  • Earmarks are a tiny tiny fraction of the overall budget. Less than 1% I believe. Plus the total money for earmarks is allocated before the projects are chosen so it's money that gets spent anyway. Earmarks are really pretty irrelevant in terms of the overall budget and as long as the 2 parties bicker about things like this and ignore the root of the problem, things will continue to get worse.

  • Many of his constituents depend on the shrimping industry for their very life. That is not what I would consider a "special interest.group." And yes I do research the people I support and there are only 2 or 3.

    You're just set against Ron Paul, seemingly, for some personal reason and most other politicians seem bent on destroying the foundations of our constitiutional rights, so I will continue to Support Campaign for Liberty and, of course, you are free to support whom you choose. Peace.

  • Not my point at all. You claimed that Ron didn't support special interest and he does.

    My beef with him is his fear mongering. SOCIALISM is coming to america......... Hello, Getting more in earmarks then what you pay in is socialism. His district is getting more money from people that don't live in his district.

    I have no problem with socialism. It's been a part of america since the start. Article 1 section 2 of the constitution says that any tax shall be divided to the states equally...

  • i love this man! Go Ron Paul!

  • People love living in their bubble, so they'll accept their Savior Obama no matter what he says and does.

  • yep, just like some supported Bush no matter what. the door swings both ways

  • People love living in their bubble, so they never even considered voting for Obama, and will never accept anything he says or does.

  • Ron Paul has a solid RECORD of defending the Constitution and liberty. The only record Obama has is:1 the most liberal in the Senate,& 2) his birth certificate- which he's afraid to produce.

    I guess you're back to ripping on Ron Paul since you got your ass kicked on the "Global Warming" issue. Global Warming is a crock of shit-PERIOD. Show us the PROOF.

  • I could never argue with anything Dr. Paul has said, which is really the reason I went from the extreme left to basically following what this man says as gospel. I could never find a logical argument that refutes anything Ron Paul has said, and yet with the left it's all theory and ironically "HOPE." I think the reason I went with the left at first is I knew something was wrong with Bush and they were the only ones complaining. Dr. Paul calls them all out, the only honest man in Congress.

  • Look first off Ron is speaking gosple to the devil they know what right and wrong is for us as americans. Unfortunatly like the devil they  just dont fucken care . They meaning the people who are bought and payed for have invested too much into this coo de tah to steal our freedom and wealth. I just dont know how or why Mr. Paul can keep his cool. Its enough to go postal on their traitor asses. MUCH RESPECT TO MR. PAUL for keeping the pressure on the nwo.

  • Holding out for a hero

  • wow...ron paul & peter schiff have been right all along!!! what a surprise!!! how about they start listening to the people that have been predicting the crisis!!!!!!