Added: 1 year ago
From: TEDtalksDirector
Views: 25,741
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (227)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @molapft

    Yes, seems to be so!

  • Thanks for a lot of information

  • this is very similar to a RBE!

  • Bury My Heart is "a life-altering approach to turning managers into unconditionally committed leaders." Check out slapcompany.

  • This week in Stockholm, Johan Rockström and his eco-fascist accomplices tried to ram through a new policy of global governance toward mass genocide. What failed in Copenhagen would now be done behind locked doors, without any open debate.

    Luckily, this fraud was exposed by the LaRouche movement's political organizers, who intervened outside the event.

    See the participants exposed in this video:

    watch?v=srYHFbom4Rc

  • Very very important talk! It's so many variables people dont think of when it comes to system changes. If we continue like we do, endlessly consuming and creating masses of waste without thinking about stability, sustainablity and efficency: the ecosystems resilience will shut down completely.

    Hence one of the many reasons my support the Venus project and the zeitgeist movement.

  • I'm supposed to listen to this guy after "climate-gate" clearly exposing the flux in temp was due to solar bursts. I say that the only thing we know for sure about the earth is that is HAS constantly changed. Carbon is a waste of everyone's time.

    Please, look this up for yourself. Reputable weather stations around the world were led to lie. Look this up, Please!!!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @dkiddroxyahoocom

    skepticalscience (dot) com (slash) Climategate-CRU-emails-hacked (dot) htm

    "climate-gate" didn't "expose" anything, other than the media's blatant misunderstanding of the terminology used in the e-mails.

    Please, look this up for yourself. Scientists (and weather stations, for that matter) don't lie. If they did, we'd still live in the medieval age!

  • what kind of species are we that a PLANET earth cant keep up with us.

    i dont wanna see the outcome of this re-invention of nature.

    people should be dying like they supposed to. damn.

  • The sandy beaches of india have tested over 50% THORIUM!! Ready to be scooped up. It's not just the average rock of earth that contains THORIUM. It's on all the planets and their moons. The moon dust is filled with THORIUM, TRITIUM etc.. all futuristic fuels.. We have to do this, or else the ecology will collapse, oil will make agriculture insufficient, transport too expensive. Murdering the billions that survive on less than 5 dollars a day &controlling the terrified rest in an Orwellian world

  • The THORIUM FLOURIDE REACTOR will be kept from us as it was from our parents, until the rich have their planned POPULATION REDUCTION. Only after that will they allow their suppressed technology to be available. Doing so today would similar to the industrial revolution explode our population and quality of life in an energy revolution. Making the monopoly men less powerful with each new free & wealthy family. The size of a dishwasher or two these could power my familys flights to mine space ;)

  • Peak Oil = Malthusian Catastrophe.

  • This is depressing...If only the world was not dominated by irrationality.

  • Bad start. We don't live on a human dominated planet. Not even close. It is dominated by bacteria then by insects then by sea creatures. Humans could vanish tomorrow and all those other creatures would stay here. Kill all bacteria, all insects or all sea creatures and humans would vanish.

  • @sondano He's talking impact here, not numbers.

  • @BaileysBeads I'm also talking about impact. Bacteria's impact on this planet is fare greater than that of humans. Bacteria plays role in EVERY biochemical process you can find in the biosphere. You can't say that about humans.

  • @sondano Bacteria aren't changing or influencing the planet they're a stable factor while humanity is not. You're confusing impact with importance. 

  • @sondano

    thats maybe the point, we are really minor- but destroying major.

  • @aerobique but not even close to the damage that Earth's hydro-, litho- and biosphere have been doing to the homo sapiens over the last 200,000 years and not even close to the damage the biosphere has been doing to itself with or without humans. Overall this is one completely f#$% up planet and has been for tens of millions of years. Frankly, what humans are doing on it is just one very small chapter in a non-stop horror story.

  • Make less kids!!!

  • Ever notice that most Environment talking heads have more than the US 1.86 average kids per household?

    Hypocrisy?

    Al Gore Has 4. How many greenhouse gases are these little bastards spewing each day?

  • The thing that annoys me about these environment talks is that they talk forever about things that we have all heard that now have a lessened effected. But what I want to know the most is exactly what I can do to help the planet. And I don't mean, "Switch to CFLs."

  • I wish TED would post more HD movies.

  • @jimius wtf do u need HD for ?

  • @s0m3w0n2 Don't ask man, people are fucking obsessed with this shit now. I personally don't care so long as the video isn't laggy or too pixelated. This looks great even on my 47" Sharp LCD TV...

  • @DawnOfEos do you have any idea how much environmental degradation went through to make those pixels... watching HD or not, as long as you indulge in big stuff, you're equally worthy of a "wtf do you need X" statement, environmentally speaking. Hypocrisy...

  • @L02T Look, my point was, we all want stuff, I got mine at my expense knowing full well what it is, I paid a good amount for my TV for the sake of selfish entertainment.

    Its a different thing to DEMAND something from what is being provided freely. I am not saying I am environmentally friendly and I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth. My point was don't demand ridiculous shit from something that is being provided for free. Please understand my point, prior to refuting it.

  • @L02T Now you want to talk about environmental degradation? Yes I am very guilty of being a nuisance to the environment. I don't have all Energy Star approved appliances and I don't drive a hybrid. I don't do it out of spite...I just don't have the money. So yes feel free to criticize me for my lack of environmental sensitivity. But my point regarding desires remains since we can fulfill our desires via our resources, but we cannot demand others to do so without justifiable compensation.

  • @s0m3w0n2

    Because it not only looks better, it's actually more comfortable to watch, especially on my high-res screen. Also not like it's a big effort to do it.

    I don't even own or watch TV/blu-ray, so i'm not a mediateinment junkie anyway.

  • this guy sounds like arnie

  • @28kb

    I think he is from Sweden, his mother tongue is Swedish which is Germanic language as well as Arnie's German.

  • I don't see what he said new here that we haven't heard 100 times.

  • @timg455 That's because apparently repeating it a 100 times isn't enough.

  • Beautiful......

  • The video title says "Johan Rockstrom" while the text in the video spells "Johan Rockstroem". What a bummer!

    #FAIL

  • This is the story the GW lobby has been trying to mess up. We need locally sustainable economy in stead of bankers trying to centralize everything far away.

  • We should be careful about our impact on the planet but I think we naturally are because our well being is at stake.

  • @Shaunt1 watch tedtalks about happy index... you don't need to have a great impact just for your well being.

  • we are flexible, life will go on. Keep an optimistic mind set.

  • His initial Malthusian drivel almost caused me to thumb down and ignore the rest. Fortunately he pulled it out by talking about many great and simple innovations that prove that there is more than enough for as far as we can see into the future. Quit screaming the sky is falling and just do the things that produce more and everything will be great. Hooray for abundance.

  • Too many people talk but so few act. Good talk nevertheless. I just hope people will start thinking and looking into more radical ideas and also look past from current obsolete systems that control this planet. Masses will make the change after all; few can start a change but only masses will actually make a difference.

  • I think this talk is for all the politicians of the world. So get your fat hands out the treasury and start do something useful for a change!!

  • 5:50

  • Pretty dry and nothing new.

    Talkers need to get away from 'big picture' and lecturing us and get down to telling us what they've done and what we can do.

  • 5:50 = awesome.... right when he says "tipping over" too.

  • And while the civilized western world takes aim to a more eco friendly lifestyle and developement, the rest of the world is about 30 to a 100 years behind us and starting a industrial revolution or are in the middle of it. You have to be developed in the first place, to think about the environment.

  • @HarveyMushman85

    And now you understand part of what this is about. India, China, and others smelled a rat at Copenhagen.

  • @CRAPCANNONS

    and i smell smug ;)

  • @HarveyMushman85

    Smug? Really? There is nothing here to be smug about. It's a nightmare. 

  • @CRAPCANNONS

    Well then i must have misinterpreted your comment. But you sounded like a wise guy talking down on me and i think you underestimate most of the people here!

  • @HarveyMushman85 Disagree.

  • @wearealltubes

    Well you can disagree, i am fine with that. It would be nice though, if you would actually tell us why!

  • @HarveyMushman85 thats not neccisarily true. now that the western world has laid some of the ground work contries like china have seen the problems caused by industrializing and are working dilligently to do it a manner that leaves the envrionment intact. now sure they're not perfect at it but they will only get better and better

  • @Darc1228

    China is not a 3rd world country. They are even helping some african nations with their developement, for resorces of course. I am talking about poor african countries, some south american countries and most of the middle east. (The -stan countires) If the developed part of the world would actually build infrastructure and facilities like plants, schools and hospitals where it is needed, poor countries would be able to help themselfes. Donating money won't get them far...

  • @HarveyMushman85

    China claims to be a developing country, which is reasonable. They do do quite a bit for other countries but the amount of cock up they're capable of at home is just remarkable.

    So the argument goes both ways depends on how you look at it.

  • We are conditioned by our environment.

    We are victims of culture.

  • T_T omg we're all gonna die

  • @OpakeArawra2

    Yes, eventually.

  • Whats the BiG IdEA ??

  • So basically he is saying that we have the solutions to the crisis already, but the people need to realize that we need to utilize them as fast as possible.

  • This was a pretty bad Ted talk. Nothing has been added to the conversation with Johan's Rockstrom's points.

  • sounds like he is Norwegian. No wonder he is so smart!

  • I'm sorry I couldn't sit through this talk.

  • For as long as we allow starvation to exist all these problems will only increase.

    First we stop poverty = first we take care of everyone. Then we sort out the shit we've done till now...

    EQUAL money for all is the start!

    We must dignify ALL LIFE EQUALY!

  • @ijjesus Equal money for all? Not worth taking seriously.....

  • @majinspy he doesn't know what he's talking about.

  • @SuperiorApostate what are you talking about??? What specifically does he not know what he is talking about???

  • @apowers7 Just to clarify, you're talking about the ijjesus guy? If so I had a conversation with him on a some previous video and he doesn't understand what nonsense he is talking.

  • @SuperiorApostate sorry thought u were talking about Rokstrom

  • @majinspy

    here we have one more person that talks without knowing the problems, without knowing the proposed solution and talking shit about it instead of first investigating the problem and ask HOW this solution would work.

    So, yeah, not worth taking you seriously.

  • @ijjesus I know how communism works. It doesn't. The idea that all humans are going to start a Utopian and purely egalitarian society is extremely naieve and extremely childish. People are greedy. This isn't changing.

  • @majinspy

    no you dont know how communism works because communism never worked, communism never existed.

    And regardless of that, equal money IS NOT communism.

    By the way: you are the greedy one who is not willing to give everyone a dignified life. We will sort you out....

  • @ijjesus Wow, an idle threat to someone on the internet. Pretty sure anyone reading this can finally write you off as a crazy. I'm not anymore greedy than anyone else. The idea that I'm going to give up my American lifestyle willingly so the rest of the world can just be given the resources / services we work for, is unrealistic. You're an asshole and a moron. Have fun in your delusional world.

  • @majinspy

    There you go -- you just revealed yourself as the scumbag in this world that is not valuying all life EQUALY. If you were born in a shit currupt contry I would like to know what you would have to say... You are living the american DREAM and I am in the delusional world...lolol funny isnt it.

    You will be forced to give it away because that is what the masses will vote for. You are a minority -- enjoy your next 20 years...

  • @majinspy I'm actually a liberal and I'm all for minorities getting what is necessary. But the elimination of the rich will be quickly followed by the elimination of the poor. If you kill off all the people who produce, who will produce what you want to redistribute? There has to be a balance.

    You are the one threatening violence, and accuse me of being a scumbag.

  • @majinspy You are confusing rich and intelligent. Our smart people are currently enslaved in order to create a bigger more profitable mess. so much as try to change any part of their game and you will be purged.

    This is why there is no more innovation in fascist amerika. For example, the rest of the world is building windmills but the projects in the US had to wait for a license for 10 years while being screamed at by unproductive bully monopolists and petrowarmongers

  • @ijjesus

    I agree that communism has not existed as it was originally intended.

    After reading more and more about these topics, I have come to realize (in my humble opinion of course) that anarcho-communism or anarcho-sindicalism might be the "flexible" all-encompassing system that will do the job to free the world economy. People join voluntary (non-profit) associations all the time and they work.

  • @ijjesus Seriously dude, you can't go around leaving such outrageous, ridiculous comments and expect anyone to respect your opinion. Why even leave a comment at all?

  • @HolyCity2012

    U are talking about you. Leaving ourageous comments without knowing at all what this new monetary system WILL entail. Of course no one will respect your OPINION. Why do you leave a comment at all if u do not know shit and clearly are not interested in sorting out the problems in this world?

  • @ijjesus Equal money for all? Then why have money? How about, everyone shares the Earth's natural resources fairly, while always striving to colonize another planet before we consume this one completely. Sound reasonable?

  • @ashleylovesdaddy

    Obviously we cannot create a system without money. We use what we have - we use money as the means of communication where all life is valued EQUALY -- this is the point: EQUALITY, Not money.

    We can use money as a means to make sure everyone has enough to LIVE.

    Yes - the earth's natural resources MUST belong to EVERYONE -- and not only a select few...

  • @ijjesus I though overpopulation was the problem. Would mass starvation and war mitigate some of the problems outlined in this video? :P

  • @mmsayre

    Equal money is in fact about guaranteeying everyone has good enough food -- and propper education. Equal money will stop wars -- because wars exist for control of resources - to provide the resources of the conquered territoty to the victorious. Therefore - with equal money - the resouces will be equally shared according to necessity.

  • @ijjesus what happens in the unlikely event that a resource is scarce?

  • @mmsayre

    Have a look: The sun will shine for a long long time, therefore we will e able to produce food for as long as the sun shines. The earthly cyles - water and wind - arent called "cycles" by chance... That which makes up your physical body was once dust - therefore you dont have to worry about scarcity.

    Obviously we cannot sustain everyone at the current level of america -- the earth just can't handle such a DREAM lolol...

    The basics will be meet - we'll make sure of it.

  • We are massively fucked if this is the best we can come up with.

  • human beings failure comes in the fact that it thinks it is not an 'animal' from this planet.

  • @troglodyte3344 we are animals...but we have one peculiar characteristic that no other animal on this planet has or at least no where near our level, being socially aware.

  • @troglodyte3344

    lmao @ stupid humans.Nah were not animals. All those "other" things are animals. Sure we resemble apes about 99% but they are animals and we are not. A starfish looks nothing like a rhinoceros yet they are both quickly labeled as "animals". Yep,all creatures are massively diverse from a crab to a zebra. Oh but we can be "aware" yea thats such a massive evolutionary advantage. After all its getting us REAL Far. Infact we even know what the point of this whole evolution thing is.

  • The fourth pressure is surprise buttsecks? History: Humans first conquered and enslaved other species and, in some cases, drove them into extinsion. Then humans conquered and enslaved each other by race and, in some cases, drove them into extinsion. Now we have conquered and enslaved the planet, and its likely we will drive it into extintion. Here's what scientists do: invent ways to change the world and implement them, not talk in TED or scare people who can't do anything about it.

  • Much of our future depends on greedy people being less greedy, violent people being less violent, and global cooperation becoming fashionable for a very long time.

  • The sustainability problem inspired me to go back to school.

  • please stop this ...'save the planet' series of boring talks !!!!! they all are essentially talking exactly the same thing...using same data but are trying to put a new spin ................ its just come to a point where people will start ignoring these issues...

  • One of the best ones I've seen on TED.

  • @koren1124 If you tell people things they already know they will say you are smart. Johan Rockstrom scored a lot of points :D

  • Getting tired of this climate change talk...Misssing inovative talks

  • i stopped at "if we invest in trust, local action based partnerships and cross-scale institutional innovations."

    this is so boring, this guy has nothing new to say

  • @Buddhabr0t Watch Albert Bartlett's video insted, if you haven't already.

  • @mininow i will, but its 8 parts. doing it tommorow...

  • Johan Rockstrom should be teaching this at universities.

  • everyone will shit their pants when i say this, but i must. I am a super super super american liberal, but must say that every once in a while TED needs to bring on a conservative point of view in order to maintain legitimacy. Without balance, you become a simple combatant to fox news, which I think is not the goal.

  • @hossboss96 Rather see TED having only smart people on the stage. Oh and TED isn't political. It's not really their fault if environmental issues like these are considered leftist by dim people.

  • @hossboss96 But TED is about new ideas not old one's.

  • @hossboss96 It's pretty hard to bring the views of an anti-science group to a community that appreciates progress. TED, unlike faux news, doesn't have a political agenda that prefers one party over the other. Maybe if unlike a two year old, we could teach the GOP a word other than "NO, Waaaahhh, it's not my way, NO NO NO."... then they'd have a spot in the real world.

  • @hossboss96

    Making the planet sustainable is not a liberal point of view.

  • @hossboss96

    nothing in this seemed liberal to me

  • @CurtHowland ok then, less of a problem then i thought if you are right. but still the solutions that could help mitigate co2 levels and not drop standard of living dramatically are all shot down by the side purposing it, and of course big government is the problem in many instances and the purposed ideal is for a government that is un-accountable to the countries that sign on that can do crazy stuff with any companies or person under it get real the problem is fascists always has and will.

  • this is bulhshit

  • LOL WOMAN AT 1:06

  • david icke is next ??

  • Climate Change: Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter

  • Ok, finished the video. Fuck this guy.

    And fuck TED if they don't knock this shit off.

  • @BroBroDude What do you mean by 'this shit'?

  • @TerhiTheFinn The endless series of global climate clowns

  • @BroBroDude I hate science too, fucking learning stuff is so lame.

  • nice threads

  • God damnit why is every TED video about climate change now.

  • @BroBroDude search for NWO

  • People are the problem. Kill the people, no more problem! :D

  • In response to his concluding statement, maybe I wasn't paying enough attention to the solutions he described in the latter part of the talk, but where does "science say" that we can "collaborate globally" around these issues? I don't think countries can actually agree to make the changes we need.

  • @weestro7 "where does "science say" that we can "collaborate globally" around these issues?"

    It's another call for global government.

  • The presentation is fantastic. The graph of the temperature with the description that constant T allowed civilization is really scary. Scientifically a very appealing explanation, but clearly we are very subject to climate changes.

    8:46

    "we can only find 9 planetary boundaries that would allow us to have a safe operating space"

    ONLY? wtf

    11:06

    6th exctinction in the history of the EARTH! Humans didn't exist when dinosaurs went extinct.

  • all lies governments have took control of food production and have starved millions to death at will

  • @poetswolf1985 poor fellow. Already swallowed by global agenda..

  • who cares about this?....noone yet....when its too late they will ....and at that time dont say god help me.....cuz its us who r responsible.....only way i can think of that can help is population controll....and its not hard....well who will listen to me anyway....

  • @ppnnlearning

    "who cares about this?"

    you obviously not so much

    How i love all these "no future" comments.... useless and counter-productive ;)

  • @aerobique oviusly i care...thats why i am commenting and wasting 10 seceond due....u think this comment is useless then u r stupid.....read it again and u will find some productive idea.....population controll is the best thigs to stop this....and u think this is not productive...then i dont have anything to say to u...u r still child and u will not get it....

  • @ppnnlearning the world is not over populated, we are over consumerated. did you know that every man woman and child could have thier own half acre of land and all fit into the continent of australia with all of Queensland and the rest of the world free. It is to make a point i of course realize geography would limit this, cities over 10k are the problem spread out stop huddling together out of fear and convenience.Population control is just a way of saying we cant trust each other to live right

  • @ppnnlearning

    population control is the elites dogma, they hate decentralized energy and decentralization in general. Take the NON - RADIOACTIVE NUCLEAR REACTOR THAT USES a "free" fuel and is abundant in our planet, about 600 years worth at present consumption of energy. Each cubic meter of average rock contains 10-12gram Thorium and 200grams EQUALS LIFETIME USE OF ELECTRICITY. It's self regulating, impossible to explode, worked everyday from 1964-69. The monopoly men won't let us have it.

  • @ppnnlearning population control.. does that mean i get to start world war 3 =D?

  • @NickBlackDIN u dont have to bro.....one male and one female can give birth 2 one child...this means....6 billion male and female population=3 billion children...after parents dies ...we have 3 billion people...it is that simple bro....thumb ups if u think so....

  • @ppnnlearning lol I was joking, but you make a very well stated point, you get a thumbs up from me =D

  • Comment removed

  • I don't think the human race will change its behaviour in time. I think James Lovelock is right and we're heading for an environmental disaster, with possibly billions of deaths by 2100...

  • @biozamadotcom try again with what is non sense or stop trying to have a conversation and then crying.

  • @maj1kninja07

    not sure what you mean here.

  • @biozamadotcom lol olololololol. TRy again with what is nonsense to you ======OR===== do no start the conversation

  • @maj1kninja07

    Your thoughts are incredibly confused.

    Stick to Lol stuff because it's obvious English is your second language.

    Use a translator or something because you sound mentally impaired.

  • @GrudgyDiablo

    Flexing those pub-softened internet muscles. Impressive.

    I did respond with a real argument. I'll ask you as well since I'm sure you don't know either.

    Do you know who Ken Lay is?

    Probably not. You probably think being an atheist is the most cutting edge thing in the world. That's as far as you can push your brain to go.

    You sad sorry little tool.

  • The tin-foil brigade is honestly going to be the end of us. If you're not going to listen to the science what's the point of anyone providing it? You're insulting the millions of man hours of research done by scientists by just casually dismissing it like that.

  • Great video, this really puts the situation global environmental confict on earth in a nutshell.

  • The BP oil spill was was destroyed most of it. This guy doesn't have the balls to address the BP situation.

    One solution is NAWAPA, but I bet TED will never touch. NAWAPA is a solution that enhances nature and helps all mankind.

    also, Bill Gates just bought 500,000 shares of Monsanto. Monsanto produces GMO foods and is attempting a food monopoly.

    TED, if anyone is listening over there, if you really believe in this man, you need to feature NAWAPA pronto.

  • @biozamadotcom NAWAPA = SOLUTION

    NAWAPA = SOLUTION

    NAWAPA = SOLUTION

    NAWAPA = SOLUTION

    NAWAPA = SOLUTION

  • @biozamadotcom Ahhhahah just like the NAU shouldn't be tried just like the EU. 90% of laws will be made there and are bill of rights it worthless.

  • @maj1kninja07

    that's actually a huge point that I do have a problem with. 

  • Comment removed

  • @happyflea you do not have to have a counter solution when pointing out the suicide of another person's. all i can give you is, more nuclear because even dr. doom bill gates says he has a way to use up the spent fuel...and burn fossil fuels in till we find something that can operate are society.

  • @maj1kninja07 "bill gates says he has a way to use up the spent fuel"

    So-called "spent fuel" is still 90+% viable, it merely needs to be reprocessed.

    GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ALLOW THAT REPROCESSING.

    As usual, scratch the surface and find govt as the real source of the problem that people cry for more govt to "solve".

  • Comment removed

  • "We are experts. You are not. We have information. You do not.

    It is time for us, the experts with the information, unelected technocrats, to void your inalienable individual rights for the sake of the collective.

    Ignore Climate Gate. Ignore Al Gore's work with Ken Lay. Ignore The Club of Rome.

    We know what's best. You don't. You will do as we say, whether you like it or not.

    You no longer belong to yourself. You belong to us."

  • @CRAPCANNONS Tin foil hat much?

  • @quathar

    Very original. Did you become a climate change expert from watching all those music videos?

    Would you like to have a fact-based discussion? Would you like to watch me destroy every one of your limp drooly opinions?

    Do you even know who Ken Lay is?

  • @CRAPCANNONS Well, you obviously didn't become a comedian watching my videos. The fact is, I don't need to be a climate change expert to understand who to listen to in this matter. And I still haven't seen one, single, argument by the skeptics that hasn't been debunked by serious climate sites, and by serious climate scientists. 99% of all arguments are of the tin foil hat kind, or failing to grasp the basics of science, or just your ordinary garden variaty of irrational.

  • @quathar

    France determined that if everyone there lived a 0-impact life it would still have 0 climate impact, but nutcases like you tried to force it through to 'lead by example'. India and China will be the future mega-polluters and they have 0 intention of acknowledging the IPCC findings, even if they were honest.

    Again, you're incapable of telling me who Ken Lay is, how he played a key part in the business side of this, and why there is a conflict of interest at the center of this alarmism.

  • @CRAPCANNONS What are you even talking about? What you just said made no sense whatsoever, apart from a truism. And absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence. That's simple logic, friend. My original comment wasn't about Ken Lay, but about the unfortunately common human condition of imagining trolls under ones bed.

  • @quathar

    "absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence"

    Odd cliche coming from an Atheist.

    Ken Lay (Enron crook extraordinaire) invented the carbon-trading scheme with ManBearPig Al Gore. The fact that you do not know this, or that organized crime runs the carbon-trading scheme in Europe, or that large corporations are propping this whole thing up, demonstrates that you are intellectually lazy and are going on faith rather than evidence, the very thing you accuse religious people of.

  • @CRAPCANNONS Most people haven't heard of argument from ignorance, so I rather doubt it is a cliché. And there is nothing odd about it. I'm not an atheist either.

    But you obviously are a tin foil hat wearing, religious conspiracy theorist and albeit I like wasting time on youtube as much as the next guy, discussing anything with you would be a futile exercise since you obviously are not capable of fully rational thinking. Bye bye, dear.

  • @quathar

    People like you use 'idées reçu' thinking others haven't heard them. It explains this tin-foil cliché as well.

    The only conspiracy theory here, dear, is alarmism propagated by frauds like the lecturer and loons like you.

    "GIM owns a 2.98% stake in the Climate Exchange, which in turn owns the Chicago Climate Exchange. This gives Al Gore a financial bias towards promoting global warming control through the trading of carbon credits."

    /watch?v=C28avoSrYyQ

    Conflict of interest much?

  • I would like to put here a great quote by Al Bartlett: "The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function."

  • @HectorCorcin The greatest shortcoming of Al Bartlett is his inability to undestand the logistic function.

  • @HectorCorcin

    speak for yourself!

  • @HectorCorcin ln function

  • @HectorCorcin What a stupid quote...

  • this is /Eugenics/ Agenda , dont let this guy brainwash you ... Watch "ENDGAME: blueprint for global" in youtube and also "overpopulation is a myth" !