I'm an isolationist. We are damned if we do and damned if we don't. If we intervene in other people's affairs we are criticized. If we mind our own business and do nothing we are criticized. If we are to be criticized either way then we should go the cheaper route. The money that we send to foreign aid could be used to fix our own problems, and a lot less of our servicemen will die for people that don't appreciate them. I doubt that the founding fathers envisioned us becoming the world police.
2:45 Uh, no, the word racism is "designed" to refer to racism. Persecution complex of Conservatives or Southerners does not change linguistic history.
Agreed! Our Foreign Policy is a mess, we continue to intervene in other countries affairs, and all we get is negative blowback. The madness must stop!
Fox news does NOT want Paul as president. They've often said he is an "isolationist" and he can't win. I worry about legalizing drugs, but Ron Paul's outstanding views on other issues is worth taking a chance. I figure drug-users will find what drug they want, legal or not. As far as people calling Paul and "isolationist" Anti-immigrant or intelligent? Before you post, check out this YouTube video about poverty/immigration entitled:
It's easy enough to follow the logic of American foreign policy: just follow the money. The oil industry has a vested interest in keeping the Middle East stable,
and the military-industrial complex has a vested interest in making that happen. It's called "empire." Make no mistake: the MIC and the mega-corporations are the real rulers of this country. The politicians are just puppets.
An estimated 1.25 trillion dollars are spent annually on military black budget ops. Don't believe me? Go to Wikipedia and type in a search for "deep underground military bases." You'll automatically be redirected to a webpage mispelling the word "underground" and giving no info at all on the subject.
@freerangebiped What about those at the head of the Council on Foreign Relations? Do you not see a link to the money machine of the Federal (sic) Reserve (sic), or even a link to the CIA?
I agree with you on this one. We have always poked our noses in other peoples business through out history. We have always told other people what to do and how to do it, but yet at the same time teach our children that's not the right thing to do. When our children cry out and say that's not right, we slap them back and tell them children should be seen and not heard. Such a vicious legacy and I'm so ashamed at our country for that...
come on jack lindsy williams said this was going to happen in october of last year and again a few weeks before it was kicked off. your a smart enough fellow to see there is no diffrence of the left and right its just wings of the same evil bird waiting to feed on the carcasses of the countries they destroy using the federal reserves and the world bank and imf all controlled by the same evil pigs pulling the strings of the left and right. peace to you and keep digging the truth will speak to you
I agree with some of it, yet I find it funny and ironic that he is offended by the use of isolationist, when I see "communist", "socialist", "Muslim" and so many other words used by conservatives to shut down discussion.
I dont think it is because the politicians dont want to intervene overseas, I'm sure they would love to. I think that we cannot afford it and there would be public outcry if we starting warfooting in Libya, Iran, Yemen, Egypt, etc, etc.
Go in debt to the world. I see a lot of talk about ending foreign entanglements and balancing the budget, but they never talk about stopping massive immigration.
You still think Saddam gassed his own people? Any PROOF. Hello, we could not find one WMD..... HELLO? The Iraq war was sooooooo illegal, I get really scared just how illegal it really was. I now question every thing I have been told about the whole thing... from Kuwait to the Cole. I doubt anything I've ever been told about all of it.
Non-interventionism – Political rulers should avoid entangling alliances with other nations and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial differences.
the interventionist vultures, both liberal and conservative, are circling over Libya, i'm getting concerned we could see western boots on the ground in Libya soon, or at the very least see a no-fly zone and or sanctions, which will strengthen Gadaffi's hand, just as it strengthened Saddams grip domestically, he'll be able to justify crackdowns by invoking the great satan.
personally I would like to see us become a isolated nation, I know that some people will disagree...that's fine, but I'm looking at it from a point of view of 1. we need to get rid of that illegal alien in the white house 2. we need to cut off all and I mean all foreign aid 3. we need to fix our own back yards before we even can think about helping the world. and 4. we need to pull out of the middle east and let them fight it out for themselves..it doesn't concern us, so leave it alone
The funny thing about all this is that we have NEVER been isolationist! As long as there have been Americans and their pre-U.S. immigrants in the early 1600s and 1700s, we've been quite active in the world around us. Remember Manifest Destiny? THAT doesn't sound too "isolationist." Remember the war we fought with Mexico ("Remember the Alamo")? Remember Smedley Butler telling everyone all the disgusting shit he had to do as a general in Latin America in the early 1900s for corporations??
Spanish-American War in 1899. The Civil War wasn't entirely a U.S. battle, either, as any scholar will tell you. Germans, Russians and many other Europeans actively supported one side or the other.
Hell, not long after the ratification of the Constitution, we were fighting perhaps our FIRST jihadist enemies (Barbury pirates)! The Barbury treaty is the one that says, in no uncertain words, that we are NOT (at least not in a legally-binding way) a "Christian nation."
The only times we were EVER anywhere near isolationist was pre-1917 in WW1 and pre-1941 with WW2, although even in WW2 we were obviously giving plenty of military aid to our allies before Pearl Harbor.
America's history is one WROUGHT heavily by the consequences of extreme intervention in places we clearly don't belong! It's about time we scale back this crap and give ourselves a little space. As Jefferson said, "Peace, commerce and friendship with all, entangling alliances with none."
@Bushwacked487 Maybe to help 'the continental congress' fight Britain in the classical european style, [symmetric warfare]
But the Contential army lost most of the battles in the war, and if Americans really didn't regard the british government as legitimate, guerrilla warfare would have sufficed to repel the invading army.
Also keep in mind what happened shortly after to france PRECISELY because of it's financial involvement in north america.
I agree 100% with your foriegn policy assessment. They should mass produce those pictures of Reagan breaking bread with the Taliban and Rummy shaking Saddam;s hand because they really are the truth behind US foriegn policy
Isolationism is the advocacy of knee-jerk embargoes and tariffs on countries we don't like. It's the smearing of patriotic Americans who would rather go to war constitutionally and make sure it's thought-out, justified, and short-lived.
I'm an isolationist. We are damned if we do and damned if we don't. If we intervene in other people's affairs we are criticized. If we mind our own business and do nothing we are criticized. If we are to be criticized either way then we should go the cheaper route. The money that we send to foreign aid could be used to fix our own problems, and a lot less of our servicemen will die for people that don't appreciate them. I doubt that the founding fathers envisioned us becoming the world police.
stammlager5 3 months ago
those quotes where great =)
rolgorevene 4 months ago
We should become Isolationist.
TheLongTimeObserver 6 months ago
2:45 Uh, no, the word racism is "designed" to refer to racism. Persecution complex of Conservatives or Southerners does not change linguistic history.
shamusername 9 months ago
Agreed! Our Foreign Policy is a mess, we continue to intervene in other countries affairs, and all we get is negative blowback. The madness must stop!
IndianaPolitico 11 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Fox news does NOT want Paul as president. They've often said he is an "isolationist" and he can't win. I worry about legalizing drugs, but Ron Paul's outstanding views on other issues is worth taking a chance. I figure drug-users will find what drug they want, legal or not. As far as people calling Paul and "isolationist" Anti-immigrant or intelligent? Before you post, check out this YouTube video about poverty/immigration entitled:
Immigration by the Numbers -- Off the Charts
vechorik 6 months ago
THERE IS A FUCKING ANIMAL IN THE WHITE HOUSE ...
```
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A FUCKING MOOK ?
HoodwinkedbyanAngel 11 months ago
Good Job just heard it on GuiltFreeRadio
BloodNorseGods 1 year ago
Ronald Reagan referred to Gaddafi as "The Mad Dog of the Middle East"?
Well he fails nicely, Libya is in North Africa -.-
Cheedillow 1 year ago
who dislikes this? lol
justingarak 1 year ago
How can Jack only get a few thousand views each video? This guy has amazing commentary.
TulliusVII 1 year ago 2
It's easy enough to follow the logic of American foreign policy: just follow the money. The oil industry has a vested interest in keeping the Middle East stable,
and the military-industrial complex has a vested interest in making that happen. It's called "empire." Make no mistake: the MIC and the mega-corporations are the real rulers of this country. The politicians are just puppets.
freerangebiped 1 year ago
An estimated 1.25 trillion dollars are spent annually on military black budget ops. Don't believe me? Go to Wikipedia and type in a search for "deep underground military bases." You'll automatically be redirected to a webpage mispelling the word "underground" and giving no info at all on the subject.
freerangebiped 1 year ago
@freerangebiped What about those at the head of the Council on Foreign Relations? Do you not see a link to the money machine of the Federal (sic) Reserve (sic), or even a link to the CIA?
sassercollins 1 year ago
@sassercollins Absolutely! I totally support Ron Paul's call to audit the Fed.
freerangebiped 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
We've always been at war with Eastasia.
AnotherUserNamedPaul 1 year ago
5:46 Is this the cover shot of Michael Savage's latest book?
vipero00 1 year ago
I agree with you on this one. We have always poked our noses in other peoples business through out history. We have always told other people what to do and how to do it, but yet at the same time teach our children that's not the right thing to do. When our children cry out and say that's not right, we slap them back and tell them children should be seen and not heard. Such a vicious legacy and I'm so ashamed at our country for that...
ChameleonLost88 1 year ago
come on jack lindsy williams said this was going to happen in october of last year and again a few weeks before it was kicked off. your a smart enough fellow to see there is no diffrence of the left and right its just wings of the same evil bird waiting to feed on the carcasses of the countries they destroy using the federal reserves and the world bank and imf all controlled by the same evil pigs pulling the strings of the left and right. peace to you and keep digging the truth will speak to you
upshot13 1 year ago
I agree with some of it, yet I find it funny and ironic that he is offended by the use of isolationist, when I see "communist", "socialist", "Muslim" and so many other words used by conservatives to shut down discussion.
ChrisLiendo 1 year ago
I always look forward to your videos. I hope that one day soon you can have a more national audience. It would do everyone a lot of good to hear you.
Codad 1 year ago 3
I dont think it is because the politicians dont want to intervene overseas, I'm sure they would love to. I think that we cannot afford it and there would be public outcry if we starting warfooting in Libya, Iran, Yemen, Egypt, etc, etc.
printo69 1 year ago
Steve sailer had it right.
Neocons mantra-
Invade the world.
Invite the world.
Go in debt to the world. I see a lot of talk about ending foreign entanglements and balancing the budget, but they never talk about stopping massive immigration.
mrhulot101 1 year ago
You still think Saddam gassed his own people? Any PROOF. Hello, we could not find one WMD..... HELLO? The Iraq war was sooooooo illegal, I get really scared just how illegal it really was. I now question every thing I have been told about the whole thing... from Kuwait to the Cole. I doubt anything I've ever been told about all of it.
btigtime2 1 year ago
Great job, Jack. This video reminds me of the book "1984".
Eastasia has always been our friend. Eurasia has always been our enemy.
Eurasia has always been our friend. Eastasia has always been our enemy.
realrockvince 1 year ago
Non-interventionism – Political rulers should avoid entangling alliances with other nations and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial differences.
yakyakyak69 1 year ago
Roland?
Clausfarre 1 year ago
the interventionist vultures, both liberal and conservative, are circling over Libya, i'm getting concerned we could see western boots on the ground in Libya soon, or at the very least see a no-fly zone and or sanctions, which will strengthen Gadaffi's hand, just as it strengthened Saddams grip domestically, he'll be able to justify crackdowns by invoking the great satan.
HuxleyWasRight 1 year ago
personally I would like to see us become a isolated nation, I know that some people will disagree...that's fine, but I'm looking at it from a point of view of 1. we need to get rid of that illegal alien in the white house 2. we need to cut off all and I mean all foreign aid 3. we need to fix our own back yards before we even can think about helping the world. and 4. we need to pull out of the middle east and let them fight it out for themselves..it doesn't concern us, so leave it alone
crewchieft6 1 year ago
The funny thing about all this is that we have NEVER been isolationist! As long as there have been Americans and their pre-U.S. immigrants in the early 1600s and 1700s, we've been quite active in the world around us. Remember Manifest Destiny? THAT doesn't sound too "isolationist." Remember the war we fought with Mexico ("Remember the Alamo")? Remember Smedley Butler telling everyone all the disgusting shit he had to do as a general in Latin America in the early 1900s for corporations??
whoo689 1 year ago 2
Spanish-American War in 1899. The Civil War wasn't entirely a U.S. battle, either, as any scholar will tell you. Germans, Russians and many other Europeans actively supported one side or the other.
Hell, not long after the ratification of the Constitution, we were fighting perhaps our FIRST jihadist enemies (Barbury pirates)! The Barbury treaty is the one that says, in no uncertain words, that we are NOT (at least not in a legally-binding way) a "Christian nation."
whoo689 1 year ago 2
This "isolationist" myth from neocons and intervention stooges MUST be put to rest once and for all. Open a fucking history book, neocons.
whoo689 1 year ago 2
The only times we were EVER anywhere near isolationist was pre-1917 in WW1 and pre-1941 with WW2, although even in WW2 we were obviously giving plenty of military aid to our allies before Pearl Harbor.
whoo689 1 year ago 2
America's history is one WROUGHT heavily by the consequences of extreme intervention in places we clearly don't belong! It's about time we scale back this crap and give ourselves a little space. As Jefferson said, "Peace, commerce and friendship with all, entangling alliances with none."
whoo689 1 year ago 26
I don't agree with him on many things, but Jack Hunter is one of the few conservatives in the movement I respect these days. That's saying something.
whoo689 1 year ago 10
Holocaust is the justification for all Western Wars since.
EMPIREofPUPPETS 1 year ago
The US would not exist without french support during the revolution. Think about that.
Bushwacked487 1 year ago
@Bushwacked487 Maybe to help 'the continental congress' fight Britain in the classical european style, [symmetric warfare]
But the Contential army lost most of the battles in the war, and if Americans really didn't regard the british government as legitimate, guerrilla warfare would have sufficed to repel the invading army.
Also keep in mind what happened shortly after to france PRECISELY because of it's financial involvement in north america.
Worldslargestipod 1 year ago
Is it me, or does this guy make too much sense?
Mauhadeeb28 1 year ago
@Mauhadeeb28 Thanks for sharing this. Subbed him. I like the logic.
gfreakj 1 year ago
I agree 100% with your foriegn policy assessment. They should mass produce those pictures of Reagan breaking bread with the Taliban and Rummy shaking Saddam;s hand because they really are the truth behind US foriegn policy
Drac39 1 year ago 3
:)))) g e n i u s
sandythebear 1 year ago
I've known of you for awhile, not sure why I didn't subscribe sooner.
nubraskan 1 year ago
Isolationism is the advocacy of knee-jerk embargoes and tariffs on countries we don't like. It's the smearing of patriotic Americans who would rather go to war constitutionally and make sure it's thought-out, justified, and short-lived.
MooseOfReason 1 year ago
awesome
xxNutcasexx 1 year ago
Heard you on the Mike Church show, glad I found your channel! Subscribing!!
pensword5 1 year ago
thnks jack as always!
mike1988123 1 year ago