Added: 7 months ago
From: DiscoveryNetworks
Views: 155,759
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (534)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Sounded good, but don't waste your time.

  • For everyone that uses god to explain what they dont understand yet. If youve seen through the wormhole where they talked about life after death. There is a guy that has pretty compelling evidence that god is in our brains. Evolution gave us a way to deal with anxiety over death by giving us a need to worship something. This scientist created an electromagnetic helmet that can turn on and off that god part of our brain. So take some time and watch it, you might just think differently.

  • I like how all the bible thumpers come out to defend their gods. Lol. All you people who are arrogant enough to think that we are so special and god created us and we can live forever in heaven are brainwashed. Have any of you thought that we still have a shitload to learn about the universe, so not everything is going to be completely explained yet. God has always been used to fill voids. Thousands of years ago everything was explained by god. We have only begun to learn about the universe wit

  • I watched the first episode and I agree with alot of people that they started it off badly. Now I am not going to go on a rant, I admit I have my biases, I was raised in the church and it is what I believe. But I do believe Science and Religion can coexist and if you really take a step back and look at everything they are just different views of the same thing. However, getting back to the show IF they had brought in other people to speak on the subject regardless it would be alot better.

  • Well this series got off to a bad start. I swear I have seen these clips from Hawking before. It pretty much said what anyone who watches discovery has heard a million times before. nothing new. the only good parts were a few of the video sequences. And the reasoning came off as vague and ambiguous. Too many unanswered questions for me.

  • Hawkings's attempt here was just a desperate response to the growing realization that people are no longer willing to accept a science that cannot coexist with spirituality. it has zero to do with 'the church'. its a revolution and its about time!

  • How did God come to existance? With the power to create the universe why wait millions of years just to create his people? Science vs the Church. Just look back at history and you can see that the Church changes it's theory when proven wrong. Now they say God created the big bang. That's going to be hard to disprove but Hawkings makes very good points. From energy to matter and matter to life and life to conciousness.

  • why is it that my comment isn't in the top? it has more thumbs up and eithe rin the top, which confuses me.

  • Of course God created the universe.

  • @OGYOSHI0007 The burden of proof lies with the believer

  • whats the background song called

  • Some of you believe in a man named Jesus and say that he is the true God. What makes him more truer/believeable than one from another religion such as Allah? You can't say that Jesus is real whilst Allah isn't because the same "evidence" from both religions loom

  • The MAIN problem here with people that watched the show is that they didn't grasp and couldn't comprehend the information being told, that's why they feel as if the question(s) were not answered. I'm not trying to disuade anyone, but my question to the believers is this

  • @2WhopperJrs I have to disagree. I think most everybody caught on to the information which was ultimately "the big bang just happened". That was a real let down to most of us that understand the scientific process. Kind of like getting a kindergarten answer to a collegiate question. The 1/2 hour panel discussion following the show was FAR more interesting.

  • @manthing43 I apologize for mayhaps I myself misinterpreted the information. What I got from what he said was that the Big Bang occurred first since that was the creation of time, therefore, no event could precede it. However, it didn't "just occur" there were energy emitted from quanta particles (I think called virtual particles) which built up over time. I thought it was the concept of particles appearing out of "nothingness" people couldn't grasp. Just my interpretation, I apologize.

  • @2WhopperJrs There's no need to apologize. People will always have different interpretations and views. And I would say yes you pretty much hit the nail on the head on what I was getting at: the concept of particles appearing out of nothingness ... which I interpreted as "just happened" because according to him time did not exist so therefore quanta particles could not build up "over time". See what I mean? He was contradicting himself.

  • @manthing43 I was also thinking that the Theory of Relativity, E=MC^2, would need a time factor in order to be relevant. With no time, there is no energy, which led me to believe that he was talking about time in a different manner, though I cannot vouch for him because I myself isn't sure what he was leading to. I suppose that I figured that he (along with anyone else in the scientific discourse group) has more knowledge about this than I so I must've missed or couldn't fully grasp the info.

  • thumbs up if you don't feel like reading every ones fucking paragraphs

  • OMG, I watched the entire show and he didn't answer the question that was posted, "what created the universe"

  • this show made me lol.

  • Comment removed

  • Great show. I never thought I'd live to see such a show on American TV. Thanks for that Discovery Channel.

  • saw this show and the guy who runess the show said god does not exist and heaven is a faire tale i think he is wrong

  • Okay, what is this song, I need to know

  • @Kenkelmx Fatboyslim: right here right now. thats the title of song

  • Hey DiscoveryNetworks whens the new episode of CURIOSITY can you tell me

  • Through the wormhole is the best

  • Did anyone else hear a pokeball in the first 4 seconds?

  • hey uh.... whats the song

  • @ddrmcm Right Here Right Now-Fatboy Slim

    

  • Stephen Hawking talked about how the Big Bang could have came from nothing by the laws of nature but failed to mention tonight where the laws of the universe came from. Who created them? The debate after the show was pretty interesting to see.

  • @JustinDanielsChannel It is assumed (not my assumption) that the laws of nature just is. Just like death, can you say that it was created? It is assumed that it is just an existence that has always existed. Mind boggling I know, but that's science. Not saying I agree or disagree with this of course, and, I too have drawn up similar-like questions after watching the segment.

  • @JustinDanielsChannel

    I was under the impression that the laws too have a negative flip side to them. As if everything in the universe adds to nothing. Anti-gravity for example.

  • @JustinDanielsChannel Why would he have to mention where the laws came from they can simply be a direct result of the big bang.

  • @batistaker123 The way I look at it, the Laws of Nature are just how humans describe their observations. It's not as though they're found in a wrapped box with a bow on top, a present from Beyond. In fact, they've taken us thousands of years of difficult digging to find and even then we're not 100% certain about much. We assume they apply universally but don't know that. But as is usual, if there's a gap there are those who will try to shoehorn a some custom designed god into it.

  • @batistaker123 The big bang was due to the collision of two universes. once lucifer fell that was the creation of hell when heaven had already existing. Whos to say both places aren't other dimensions? We basically are the thin line between the two.

  • @imnoidiot4 How do you know how the big bang occured? There's no manufacturer tag that says "manufactured by 2 Universe Ltd - copyright dated "the beginning". You don't know any more than Hawkins does. None of us know nor will we ever know. You either believe the universe was created with cause & effect by God - or your like Hawkins & believe there was no cause & effect: It just simply happened. Nothing special bout Hawkins, millions others came to same conclusion he did lonnnng b4 he did.

  • So after all the hype, and all the years he spent studying & pondering, Hawkins theory on the creation of the universe is a basic "it just happened". #EPICFAIL And we are all suppose to be tripping all over ourselves for that? How is it that people that are considered to be so smart by so many ... are actually very dumb??

  • So instead of talking about this excellent new series, the comments section has devolved into a science vs religion shitfest.

    Here is the thing, it doesn't matter if you're Aetheist, Christian, Muslim, Agnostic, Jewish, or Hindi. It doesn't matter if you have a higher IQ than Einstein or have more faith than your local Priest.

    You all look like idiots if you argue about it on Youtube.

    And that is a universal truth.

  • I Like This Song :)

  • Let's get down to the real important question to settle all the arguing!

    What is the name of the song!?

  • whats the name of this song? :D

  • I also feel lucky to exist at this time. Out of no where I come to existance to only go back to nothingness when that time comes.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • God created everything. Were just blinded by stupidity :)

  • This, I believe, is one of Hawking's mistakes. He says since "time" didn't exist before the Big Bang, so God couldn't have existed. But the "time" he is referring to is time in our universe. But using the theory that there are other universes, then time would exist there. Just like his analogy that time doesn't exist in a black hole... but time does exist outside of the black hole. Therefore, time can both exist and not exist at the same time, just not in the same place.

  • @nojj25 It is difficult for one to grasp the concept of 'time', perhaps because of our everyday relationship with it, we think not of it's parameters. Hawkins suggested that The Big Bang created the universe (this goes for theorized multi-verses too) because such a phenomenon didn't occur at just a single point. Also, time does exist in a black hole, it's just different to the relative time outside one.

  • If you break down time to its simple formulae: time = distance/speed, an object does have a velocity in a black hole and a black hole has space for said object to travel a given distance, therefore, there's time. I think his mistake is that he defined a God restricted by nature's laws whereas a God is mostly defined outside of. He said that God couldn't exist because such didn't follow nature's laws, but the question is why would he believe that a deity was to be confined by laws it created.

  • I think he makes good points but I thought there's no theory in physics that could not unify the very big and the very small yet. I heard virtual particals existed in space, but not outside of space. To say the universe came into existance because particals can doesn't seem right to me. What if the paritcals are moving so fast they appear to be in and out of existance.

  • of course god created the universe

  • @megadeabias I don't want to start an argument, just a friendly discussion, but my belief is that God was created with the universe, while the laws of physics created the stars, planets, and other celestial bodies, He set in motion the beginning of life, and allowed life to evolve into the many species of organisms along the way, since there is proof of human evolution. But, none of us can truly know until we die, and pass on to the afterlife, where the secrets of the universe will be revealed.

  • Hawking says "Nothing" is the only thing that existed outside of time. Can "Nothing" exist inside of time?

  • Let's all start arguing over a question that's been floating around for an eternity.

  • for real? thats just stupid

  • One reason the USA is sinking economically is all the religious nonsense taking up people's time and focus. On a macro economically scale; the USA's position as the #1 country in science and technology driving the health of the import/export ratio is now being jeopardized as other countries, especially China, are taking over. The growth in the USA population is sadly now highest among the less educated and often very religious (often immigrant) population.

    The Bible doesn't even know the USA :-)

  • If Stephen Hawking is so smart, why didn't he try to find a cure for his disease instead of studying the universe? He could have found a cure, prolonging his life, helping thousands of other people, then study the universe.

  • @nojj25 because, to be more successful, you have to participate, and motivation helps increase participation. If Stephen isn't interested in his disease, and rather astronomy, it would make more sense to study astronomy, which he would most likely be more devoted to.

  • @kuledrumergie87

    To be more successful? Really? I don't think that is why Hawking chose to study the universe. Hawking has also said that he is not looking forward to death, so couldn't that then also be used as motivation? Oh, btw, this original comment was meant as a joke.

  • @nojj25 oh, sorry about that. So many people on the internet these days would be serious when posting a comment like that, that I just jumped to conclusions. And now that you mention it, what I said doesn't make as much sense as I originally thought.

  • I MISSED IT TODAY! i was watching falling skies :3

  • FUCK! I could have seen the show. I even saw half of the add I just realized TODAY, but then I walked out of the room to miss the rest of it :(

  • ...however, 'time' is well, relevant only to this universe. Since 'space' is infinite, 'time' is actually- irrelevant to 'space': Time is measured & a measurement in itself. Man can only judge according to what conditions of the past the human brain has evolved to- Within the confines of earths' paradigm: Time. Ergo, we are left once again, at square one: This program merely displayed personal prejudices over objective reasoning. There are still dimensions beyond this universe and its' "time."

  • well god is a figure we cant see hear or smell him but we believe in him

  • The fact remains that modern civilization developed the way it did based on strict religious tenents either Eastern or Western philosophies. What a world it would be if humans did not believe in divine retribution or codes of ethical conduct. Since WWII there has been an erosion of God in this country and western Europe as well. Just look how people treat each other now with a deficit of decency, lack of authority and a general proliferation of anti social behavior.

  • Stephan hawkins for the 1st time in my opinion is WRONG.

    He explains that time came from a point.. but what created that action to create TIME.

    His premise for time needed for god to exist - is a baseless one.

    In fact, you could say it is his own belief.. where he has no facts to base this on.

  • Shit! Didn't watch the video cuz it sounded like a commercial!

  • God was created by man. When man didn't have the answers, he created a deity or group of deities to explain things that he could not. Humanity needs to take off the training wheels and realize that religion is a hindrance on our progress as a species. It took the Catholic Church nearly 400 years to admit that Galileo had proved its entire Sacred Scripture to be false. If that's not enough proof then I don't know what is.

  • @Trex973

    You asked for proof.

    Stephen proved that you needed a point in time to start.

    However he gives NO ANSWER to the 1st cause of Energy or Mass.

    And the law of conservation of energy/mass DEMANDS that one cannot begin from nothing - it STARTS somewhere.

    Stephen says you need time for mass and energy to exist - this is FALSE as we all know that mass and energy exist without time on a blackhole. In fact Stephen contradicts himself by pointing this out.

  • @Trex973 can you provide any information on where you're getting that from? What did Galileo prove false? More info please

  • @Trex973 Don't forget the Catholics burning books or whatever... or is that what your saying i don't know, i remember them burning books for some stupid reason

  • @Trex973

    How is the ignorance of one sect of one religion proof that God doesn't exist? there's ignorance in all different kinds of people in all different parts of the world with different beliefs.

  • After seeing these greedy human beings...I long for a god!!!

  • I used to believe in God, but after watching this i feel that there is no God. But i still want to believe in an afterlife somewhere beyond our universe. So who know's maybe there are more than one universes (universi?)

  • @Sood1200abhi In the documentary, part of his definition of a god is that it exists within time. The God of the Bible exists outside of time, having created it along with the universe. GOD is the one that has no begining, as he is not bound by time. The whole documentary is Stephen using a strawmans argument to disprove God. Actually, he never gives a clear definition of what god he's talking about, besides one that exists within time.

  • @comenter27 Before we move forward, what God are YOU talking about? If your talking about the Christian God then that god's a fallacy. If it exists out of time entering time would likely cause a break down of time, such as sending its only son to earth. The religious God can only exist in time as it apparently effects things in this world. To effect this world it would have to exist within time.

  • @GearsOfRevan I am talking about the living God of the Bible. First, who says that God entering time would cause a breakdown of it? Second, God exists everywhere, and can do almost anything. God entered the world as 100% man and 100% God. Man exists within time, and so can God. A God powerful enough to create something could exist within it as well after he creates it. When you enter your house, does it break down because of your presence? No.

  • @comenter27 But, don't fool yourself. If a God were to exist it would be more accurate to define them as a universe generator as opposed to a Divine Father. Was the earth created in 7 days? No. Is it 6,000 yrs old? No. Can something exist both inside and outside of time? No.

  • @GearsOfRevan How can you say what God can and can't do? And where do you get the idea that if God existed outside of time and then enterd it, that time itself would be destroyed? More imporantly, I would rather discuss the fallacies of Prof. Hawking's argument for no creator the topic this video is advertising

  • @comenter27 Okay, look. For both you and me, this is like trying to kick water up hill. Another random user on youtube won't change the opinion of someone else. I came to the conclusion after watching into the universe (the show that aired afterward) that I'm done debating this shit. All it does is make me angry and tired for no reason. Sorry if you wanted some long term debate, but I've decided to be a spectator from now on. Go to another video, I'm sure you can find someone to argue with.

  • @GearsOfRevan Okay, but you replied to me telling another person about Jesus and Hawking's lack of defining any particular God (besides maybe those of Norse Mythology) and using a straw-man argument. i wasn't really looking for a debate, just trying to save a lost soul. Have a nice, God-Blessed life!

  • @comenter27 Oh, you almost dragged me back in. Alright... Have an eventful and interesting life and live it to the fullest. After all, its the only one you get.

  • @comenter27 /watch?v=r6w2M50_Xdk

  • @GearsOfRevan Cont. in the same way, God enters his creations without breaking them

  • @comenter27 "Enters his creations without breaking them?" You know, I thought "Hey, let's engage. Why not?" But, we're already at the "God can do anything." Okay, here we go. Say God made the laws of nature, made it possible for energy and space to exist at one time and then created everything. If this was when time began, then let's say God exists out of time at this moment. Continuing in next post...

  • @comenter27 Now, for something to exist out of time, it must exist either in a black hole or outside of the universe. If God were to enter the universe, God were to now exist in time. But, God cannot exist in time. Why? Because were there is time there is space. Space is filled with negative energy which creates a balance and allows the universe to remain at zero. If God were to enter there would no longer be a balance. Look, its fine to believe in a deity for support.

  • @Sood1200abhi (Cont from first message) In Rev. 22:13 God as Jesus says "I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last" Hevean and Hell are real, and the only way to make it to paradise is to repent and come to Jesus.

  • I don't believe in god, or anything else god realted. However, I do believe that this argueing is gone WAY OUT OF HAND! All of you shut up. My fellow atheist, you are stupid for argueing with them(Unless they started with you.). Religious people, you are stupid (Not because you believe in god, because you are trying to force someone else to believe. And that is why most of you are stupid).

  • LOL the religious zealots can't handle the facts. Or perhaps they are just too dumb to. Well, that's what you get for being willfully ignorant.

  • @CoreyfromEarth You are the only only "dumb, willfully ignorant" person I see here my fellow Atheist(if you are one). I'll tell you why, calling out the whole population of religious people is retarded. You do not understand and could never understand why they believe. They're whole ancestors believed before them, aslo, the passion in songs and in there souls doesn't allow them not to believe. They know the truth deep down, so you need to shut your less understanding mouth!

  • @animeloverxl First of all, yes I'm an atheist. Second I call them out all the time, get over it. Third, I grew up in a family of religious zealots, don't tell I don't "understand why they believe." They've been brought up to believe in outrageous and irrational claims w/o evidence to support them. It's insanity. I know all about it and I'm happy to think for myself and not believe in such fairy tale garbage unless it was supported by rational evidence. But it's not. None of it is. It's hokum.

  • @CoreyfromEarth Dude, please be quiet. Your just getting people that you don't know mad at you. I understand where you are coming from, but I also understand where they are coming from. So please lets just forgot about this. I will remove my comment if you remove yours first. Please do not reply to this, I don't feel like explaining it to someone who doesn't understand.

  • @animeloverxl You're a moron. Honestly I fucking told you I understand these people. You have the audacity to defend this manipulative con job and you call yourself an atheist? And what arrogance you have telling me I don't get it and to tell me to remove my comment. You say you're an atheist. You're either full of shit, or it's YOU who doesn't get the big picture.

  • Well that was anti-scientific...

    Yeah if you're a physicist you don't stop and assume what you're observing is being caused by God, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY! You don't stop and make the assumption NOTHING is the reason for what happened. In fact if you're a real physicist you NEVER make the guess that there is no cause...

    Also just because OUR TIME stops existing at the Big Bang does not mean our Universe is not embeeded in something else with it's OWN TIME and laws.

  • @rooster9116....It wasn't anti-scientific at all. "Did god create the universe"...Religion is all man made %100, but if there is a god he surely is a Scientist...just in case you reply back--lets take it a step further, lets just say the universe always existed, so there wouldn't need to be a creator because the universe always existed. Science is "evidence" no matter what your question is..."A skygod" doesn't have an answer...but in my opinion I really hope we have a soul and this isn't it!!

  • @freedomland11 When I said it was anti-scientific I wasn't specifically talking about the show as a "whole", the show was fine. But their conclusion was anti-scientific, I mean assuming "nothing" or "no reason" is anti-scientific.For example say you look up a cloud moving across the sky. As a physicist you wouldn't want to say, "I bet God's moving that cloud"because there's probably a better answer. But also!You'd never say, "I bet there's nothing moving that cloud,there's no reason,itjust is

  • @rooster9116..Well the cloud example is a little easy to answer..The earth moves, so the cloud moves! But I know what your getting at. It's like the "watchmaker" example, if you know what I'm talking about?!! A "SkyGod" is something science cannot explain, because how can you explain a "spirit" or lets take it a step forward. How can science explain "Do we have a spirit"..Science are questions with a reasonable answer!! So all in all "Skygod" if there is one is "SCIENCE" in its fullest!

    Bronx

  • It amazes me how touchy this subject is for those who are religious. I see it as a very cut and dry answer. If this is Gods creation then God is incompetent. If God needs me to worship him, then God is insecure. If God has a message for mankind, then he should tell them himself instead of working so called miracles in front of people over 2,000 years ago and telling them to spread the word for future generations. I believe that Stephen Hawkins has it correct.

  • Someone upload this to piratebay for me in case I miss this!!!!

    Thumbs up so others can see!!!!!!!!

    (I just got wooden floors so I had to move my tv now I can't watch anything lol)

  • Many of you are misinterpreting this. No renowned scientist ever says outright that "God doesn't exist" because some of them believe in a Supernatural force/being, i.e. Isaac Newton. I guarantee this show will not say neither "God created the universe" nor "God didn't create the universe" because such is something that cannot be proven nor disproved.  This of course isn't going to stop the on-going debates, but just some food for thought.

  • vanhalen

    David Lee Roth

    Eddie Van Halen

    Alex Van Halen

    Wolfgang Van Halen

    New music coming in 2011 

  • Right into my top favorites ~

    2011 Rocks 

  • @THEMUSICR Theres nothing wrong with believing that somehow there is a higher being that will bring you care and comfort after your time is up but if your gonna go spouting nonsense where its not needed then please write it neatly on a piece of paper, put it in an envelope, fold it up and shove it up your ass.

  • THEMUSICR oh my bad man it seems you one of those pushes cristians who flashes there god around saying it the truth and that everybody else is fucking wrong dude it's nice to know that you beleve in a invisible man that lives in the sky but that's all and good until you push it on other people and start saying shit like oh your going to be sorry when judgment day comes and start using your religion to try and scare the sane people

  • Chuck Norris + Discovery Channel = Curiosity

  • Just set my DVR for this.. XD

  • @THEMUSICR are you trolling?

  • VVV troll VVV

  • God is the creator, author, of everything, He's sitting on his throne laughing at all y"all unbeliever's and athiest. Just wait and die. You'll see the truth

  • @THEMUSICR The truth is that your heart will be weighed on a scale against a feather, oh wait, that's the Egyptians. The truth is that you will be judged by Jesus, God, and Adam Smith, oh wait, that's mormonism, the truth is...

    The truth is science and logic, not giving yourself false hope for a fake reality after you die. It's a shame that people like you who believe in creationism and god actually exist.

  • @DrDeso1 Okay. If that helps you sleep at night. But God is real. Regardless of what lie's those scientist say. That's the problem with human beings. They trust into man so much and think they're God. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know this earth didn't appear by chance or by itself. You really think all this is happening for no reason? You think that you're here for no reason? Just to live and Die and that's it? nope. You're gonna be in for a big suprise on Judgement Day

  • @THEMUSICR Have you even learned anything about the scientific creation of the Earth? The Solar system was a large cloud of dust particles and other matter until some of them were pulled together. These larger pieces of debris had more gravity and began to attract other particles, making the piece even bigger until it was Finally the size of the Earth (including the moon crashing into Earth) So please explain to me how that makes less sense than God suddenly creating a massive planet.

  • @kuledrumergie87 I really don't care. God made this earth. This earth and universe couldn't have created itself. It takes a moron to think something can create itself unless you're God

  • @THEMUSICR There are a lot of theories. Fighting will get no one anywhere. This is why people cannot believe in a God. Because not all his followers are perfect. Because not all his followers can prove his existance. Because not all his followers truley believe him. Christianity and many other religions are split into denominations and cults and such... But if there is a Jesus, then there would only be one group, one belief, and one hope. But this is reality. I respect this "moron's" opinion.

  • @Masterdarwin88 Nobody is perfect. Rather we believe in God or not. It's impossible to be perfect on this earth. The only person that was perfect on this earth was Jesus because he is God. But it isn't about proof alone. It's about faith and understanding. You obviously have no knowledge of God so I can't be be mad at you. I know God is real from personal experiences. And whatever you say will not change who God is. He's King of Kings and ruler of everything. And judgement day is gonna be scary

  • @Masterdarwin88 But what is so special about his opinion? Honestly, millions of others have come to the same conclusion lonnnnng before he did. Big Whoop. Whats so special about saying the big bang just happened by pure accident? I found this 1st episode of this series to be comical. He offered no proof of his belief. Why? Cuz there is no proof & never will be. None of will ever be able to comprehend and God can't be measured by a yardstick or put under a microscope.

  • @THEMUSICR But God didn't create the earth. If he is real, the most he did was set in motion the beginning, the start of the debris coming together. So please tell me how something proven by science is less possible than something you read out of a book in a house dedicated to a possible all-knowing supernatural being. The theory of Creation has no proof whatsoever, so to say that it is the real is like saying Hitler was not the cause of Concentration camps being opened.

  • @kuledrumergie87 You say the theory of creation has no proof whatsoever. & yet any other theory has no scientific proof either. Or did you not catch Hawkins saying that it is his "opinion". Opinions are not scientific proof. For that matter, his theory "the big bang just happened" is blatantly devoid of even mediocre scientific thought. So sad this "smart" man devoted (wasted?) so many years of his life to come to the same conclusion millions others have long b4 he did.

  • hahahaahhaah, Did god create the Universe? What evidence are they gonna have in favor of that lol

  • @iAMsoBEAST1 They could use the evidence from that one book... you know, that fairytale book... The bible

  • @slpskier95 It's gonna be a short episod lol

  • /watch?v=TtK4tpgQlGU to learn how to be a carrot!

  • who knew that stewie griffin from family guy caused the big bang theory (feel free to ask me)

  • was anyone else annoyed at the ad and then realized, THIS IS THE VIDEO???

  • /watch?v=zWURvAuH0eM really cute dog :)

  • im sorry to ask a dumb question but what song is that?

  • @mvpbeachperson the song is called right here right now by fat boy slim

  • check out my new channel, i make nail tutorials (:<33

  • I always thought that the argument that God doesn't exist was as weak as the one that he does. Easier to explain that God is the reason not the why or how. For faith is not a blind action but the combination of hope and hypothesis. The reason that most of us that believe in God have trouble with accepting faith=hypothesis is because they do not like to "test" God. To me I do not test God I try to define God. To atheists: to rule a possibility out before the end of the experiment is unscientific.

  • @seanmetzinger I know I'll offend both sides but that is how life, the living experiment, goes.

  • Don't even watch this first episode. Science already has the answer to this question. GOD DID NOT CREATE THE UNIVERSE

  • @ZachKlever then wat did? germs,dusk, a boom outta nowhere because they make exploitation in space out of nowhere from some chemicals?? get the fuck outta here don't bring your sadness to us, if you think like that then then don't come on this video, u don't know everything and same with man, i don't know but i know something is out there

  • @ZachKlever then what did?

  • @LtakeOanotherVlookE We do not know at this time and it is only a possibility that we may never know. But we can be almost absolutely sure that it wasn't created by magic by a being called a god.

  • @ZachKlever "science already has the answer to this question" then you go on to say "we do not know at this time..." so in other words your as clueless as everyone else on Earth

  • @LtakeOanotherVlookE You are lost. Let me help you. You are talking about two different questions which are "Did God create the universe?" and "What created the universe?". I said science had the answer to the first one but now you are saying that I said that science had the answer to the second one also which is false. Science knows pretty definitively that God did not create the universe, but that does not mean that science has the answer. All science has done is eliminate that one possibility

  • @ZachKlever yeah, I hope they find out within my lifetime, how something smaller than an atom appeared outta nothing and expanded into hundreds of billions of cubic light years filled with galaxies and this thing we call "space"

  • @LtakeOanotherVlookE Did you watch the show? It was pretty entertaining

  • @ZachKlever yeah, I love Steven Hawking, he's the one person in the world i'd like to meet

  • @ZachKlever It was entertaining, I wish he answer the question though

  • THE SONG---- Right Here, Right Now---Fat Boy Slim

  • NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SHARK WEEK IS OVER!!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHH

  • iuo0967uijorkjrk-[rykurkuj-ykj­kjyk-ju]ku-yk-ujk7097-u0-7908 i7-78ikjukjkjtyuuikupjjurjutuj­eyotkyioiyjmhjiyjyu6ry665yt54t­6e56tret5tfrgfretrtrtrfstttrt5­43t5tt 2

  • This is misleading. I thought this was about bi-curious chicks

  • DID GOD CREATE THE UNIVERSE? YES!!!!

    CAN'T WAIT TIL SUNDAY

  • WHAT IS THE SONG, I LOVE IT!

  • curiosity

  • hows this...f** god? it will never happen..there is NO god..

  • FLAAAAAAME WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!!!!!!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • This should be a great series! Looking forward to it.

  • Woah. Made a lot of mistakes.... Interacted*, Anyways, I support the fact that the millions upon millions of people who look up to this man outnumber a few ignorant, blasmephic articles that spew lies.

  • whats the background song

  • @Rexfailed Right here Right now, that's the song

  • How about this "curiosity"- do we need authority?

  • I HAVE SEEN THIS COMMERCIAL 800 FUCKING TIMES IN THE LAST 2 DAYS

    damn my love of how its made

  • Stephen Hawking is a moron!!!!! He thinks we came from aliens:P

  • @mrcoolman4321 Stop being rude. He is one of the most intelligent people on earth. You probably know nothing up him to make an assumption like that of him.

  • @Masterdarwin88 yes i do because i actually read articles of this "intelligent" man. and tihs one article said he think the earth created by ALIENS!!!! whoever believes him is as retarted as harold camping followers!!

  • @mrcoolman4321

    "This one article"? How many articles do you think he's written and you choose to jump up about one line you appear to have misinterpreted? It sure as hell doesn't help when you are making your point emphasizing "ALIENS!!!!". You make it seem like the idea of aliens is absurd and as stupid as Harold Camping was. If Aliens didn't directly place our species or another one here, there is still a gigantic chance that some life form out there did indirectly effect our growth.

    Kthxbai