James White is a bias fundamentalist christian. All authors have mistakes. At least Bart Ehrman is exposing the bandaids and inconclusive theologies of christianity. Barts thesis statements are right on. No autographs of scripture, no absolute certainty the bible is what was originally. Christians are horrendous to think bible today is what god intended. Bart has studied countless manuscripts, james white hasnt. Dont be daft. Agnostics are being genuine, christians are wishful thinkers.
His Scottish accent sounds like a demented Irish Pakistani. Surely his Gob should provide him with a perfect accent wherever he goes as he spreads the worm of Gob.
55 Min in and Dr. White just said that "Muslim's don't take Dr. Ehrman's critical thinking and apply it to their own religion"...was he being ironic? That's the funniest thing I've heard in the entire "critique".
31 minutes in and Dr. White has mentioned 3 times that Ehrman didn't research him or listen to his other speeches in preparation for their debate. Obviously if Ehrman didn't research Dr. White it is clear that he's made up everything he says about the bible and is a fraud...again...where's the part where Ehrman is wrong? So far...nothing. I hope I'm not wasting an hour for nothing to listen to Dr. White's "Critique of Ehrman". I'm waiting...
Oh good gosh...26 minutes in and we get the big "Aha!" moment...Ehrman describes the time between Paul's letter to the Galatians and it's first attestation in history as 150 years, but the first attestation of some famous Roman writers was much longer and Ehrman only describes them as really enormous...wow...Ehrman's a fraud...I hope I get some actual critique from Dr. White...so far this is a joke.
18 Minutes in and so far Dr. White hasn't pointed out anything that Bart Ehrman has said that is incorrect or wrong, but he's asserted that "Ehrman doesn't seem to live life with any joy" or something to that effect. Is this supposed to be criticism? His critique is like just about every other Christian apologist...they try to cast aspersions on people that question the bible, but don't ever turn that lens on the bible itself...odd...
@JesusOrMuhammad Pathetic drivel of a presentation. May science and clear , rational thought bless Dr. Ehrman and his intelligent take on the pish coming from Chwistians and their apologists.
@JesusOrMuhammad Err no, they are Chwistian apologist scum who should know very well that the Wholly Bibble is a pile of crap but they still insist on stuffing it down the throats of the gullible every year and accepting a big fat paycheque for doing so. It doesn't matter how many people dispute the truth, the truth will out.
@JesusOrMuhammad I guess your moniker indicates a certain level of indecision on your part over who is the real messiah. Well, I reckon they are both big bags of shit. My reason for thinking that is not from a condition of ignorance but rather from a well thought out position of knowledge & reason. If either of those men were amssiah or a true prophet of the one true Gob, then everyone who read their fairy tales would be converted to their faith, they aren't so it's all shite!
@JesusOrMuhammad Good comeback, any attempt to deny my assertion or argue in favour of your sky fairy? No? Just a silly comment, well, what else can we expect from someone over the age of five or six who believes in an invisible friend?
The fact that Ehrman abandoned Christianity due to the problem of evil speaks volumes as to how in-tune he was with the faith in the first place...dear God that's a horrible reason.
@M3PanoS I agree it is bad for any one to disbelieve in God because, in their view, no God could allow people to SUFFER as they do, etc. And this is what he says is the reason he became an atheist, not from the contradictions or discrepancies he's found in the Bible. I think his dedication to the his faith to the point of wanting to continue to grow as a Christian by understanding the passages of the Bible, etc. is what lead him to what now he espouses about the Bible. It's not his
@M3PanoS fault these inaccuracies exist now in the New Testament. He was probably very surprised to discover them as anyone. Correction: I meant his dedication to his faith...
@1122stardust ya ERRman is totally unbiased...
semajgnik 1 month ago
James White is a bias fundamentalist christian. All authors have mistakes. At least Bart Ehrman is exposing the bandaids and inconclusive theologies of christianity. Barts thesis statements are right on. No autographs of scripture, no absolute certainty the bible is what was originally. Christians are horrendous to think bible today is what god intended. Bart has studied countless manuscripts, james white hasnt. Dont be daft. Agnostics are being genuine, christians are wishful thinkers.
1122stardust 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At 48:28 John 13:1-3 when the devil is introduced is when this argument and the gospel fails, because there is NO devil.
gjsterp 1 month ago
Comment removed
gjsterp 1 month ago
His Scottish accent sounds like a demented Irish Pakistani. Surely his Gob should provide him with a perfect accent wherever he goes as he spreads the worm of Gob.
CalumGilhooly 1 month ago
55 Min in and Dr. White just said that "Muslim's don't take Dr. Ehrman's critical thinking and apply it to their own religion"...was he being ironic? That's the funniest thing I've heard in the entire "critique".
sundude5 2 months ago
31 minutes in and Dr. White has mentioned 3 times that Ehrman didn't research him or listen to his other speeches in preparation for their debate. Obviously if Ehrman didn't research Dr. White it is clear that he's made up everything he says about the bible and is a fraud...again...where's the part where Ehrman is wrong? So far...nothing. I hope I'm not wasting an hour for nothing to listen to Dr. White's "Critique of Ehrman". I'm waiting...
sundude5 2 months ago
Oh good gosh...26 minutes in and we get the big "Aha!" moment...Ehrman describes the time between Paul's letter to the Galatians and it's first attestation in history as 150 years, but the first attestation of some famous Roman writers was much longer and Ehrman only describes them as really enormous...wow...Ehrman's a fraud...I hope I get some actual critique from Dr. White...so far this is a joke.
sundude5 2 months ago
18 Minutes in and so far Dr. White hasn't pointed out anything that Bart Ehrman has said that is incorrect or wrong, but he's asserted that "Ehrman doesn't seem to live life with any joy" or something to that effect. Is this supposed to be criticism? His critique is like just about every other Christian apologist...they try to cast aspersions on people that question the bible, but don't ever turn that lens on the bible itself...odd...
sundude5 2 months ago
Thank you Dr. White- very diligent in all of your presentations ! God Bless
shieldsff 2 months ago
Great presentation. May God bless Dr White richly
JesusOrMuhammad 5 months ago
@JesusOrMuhammad Pathetic drivel of a presentation. May science and clear , rational thought bless Dr. Ehrman and his intelligent take on the pish coming from Chwistians and their apologists.
CalumGilhooly 1 month ago
@CalumGilhooly Ehrman has been destroyed by Dr Daniel B Wallace and others aswell
JesusOrMuhammad 1 month ago
@JesusOrMuhammad Err no, they are Chwistian apologist scum who should know very well that the Wholly Bibble is a pile of crap but they still insist on stuffing it down the throats of the gullible every year and accepting a big fat paycheque for doing so. It doesn't matter how many people dispute the truth, the truth will out.
CalumGilhooly 1 month ago
@CalumGilhooly Whatever ignoramus
JesusOrMuhammad 1 month ago
@JesusOrMuhammad I guess your moniker indicates a certain level of indecision on your part over who is the real messiah. Well, I reckon they are both big bags of shit. My reason for thinking that is not from a condition of ignorance but rather from a well thought out position of knowledge & reason. If either of those men were amssiah or a true prophet of the one true Gob, then everyone who read their fairy tales would be converted to their faith, they aren't so it's all shite!
CalumGilhooly 1 month ago
@CalumGilhooly Get lost moron
JesusOrMuhammad 1 month ago
@JesusOrMuhammad Good comeback, any attempt to deny my assertion or argue in favour of your sky fairy? No? Just a silly comment, well, what else can we expect from someone over the age of five or six who believes in an invisible friend?
CalumGilhooly 1 month ago
@JesusOrMuhammad Erhman is not a polished speaker like those trained for evangelicalism, which is why you should read his books.
Try watching his 'history of the Bible' on YT.
gjsterp 1 month ago
I should have figured that John Stewart would say something like that, but to think Bart Ehrman condescends like that to layman such as myself.
Lukyo1984 6 months ago 3
The fact that Ehrman abandoned Christianity due to the problem of evil speaks volumes as to how in-tune he was with the faith in the first place...dear God that's a horrible reason.
M3PanoS 6 months ago 10
@M3PanoS Amen! Great comment.
ZealfortheCross 6 months ago
@M3PanoS I agree it is bad for any one to disbelieve in God because, in their view, no God could allow people to SUFFER as they do, etc. And this is what he says is the reason he became an atheist, not from the contradictions or discrepancies he's found in the Bible. I think his dedication to the his faith to the point of wanting to continue to grow as a Christian by understanding the passages of the Bible, etc. is what lead him to what now he espouses about the Bible. It's not his
amuslima99 4 days ago
@M3PanoS fault these inaccuracies exist now in the New Testament. He was probably very surprised to discover them as anyone. Correction: I meant his dedication to his faith...
amuslima99 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So you are supporting Calvinism?
mcriot80 6 months ago