@tbirdsport302 i have a 5.2L dakota now LOL i use to have a 4.0L ranger from what i can tell the ranger is faster i started looking into it it's probably the rear end that has a lot to do with it rangers have 373 or 410 rear ends my dakota only has a 355 or smaller
i have a 5.2L dakota now LOL i use to have a 4.0L ranger from what i can tell the ranger is faster i started looking into it it's probably the rear end that has a lot to do with it rangers have 373 or 410 rear ends my dakota only has a 355 or smaller
@spuddud19 it could be very well be faster i'm not sure.....but i don't think he floored it completely in this video, shifted out of first at 4K and had another 1K rpm to go if floored....i would say to look at another 5.2 0-60 but I couldn't find another on here lol
@metaltera86 I was referring to it falling because the amount of gas you probably went through while flooring it. (jokingly...) I have a 94 318 as well with now 98k miles. Gets about 15-17mpg... ..
i have driven this truck and that was definitely not floored
sprinkler5802 3 months ago
@sprinkler5802 you're right, i didn't think it was either...but still for 3/4 throttle they aren't half bad for a mid 90's pick-up.
tbirdsport302 3 months ago
@tbirdsport302 i drove an 01' with a 5.2 and first gear was down right scary at full throttle
sprinkler5802 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tbirdsport302 i have a 5.2L dakota now LOL i use to have a 4.0L ranger from what i can tell the ranger is faster i started looking into it it's probably the rear end that has a lot to do with it rangers have 373 or 410 rear ends my dakota only has a 355 or smaller
spuddud19 5 months ago
i have a 5.2L dakota now LOL i use to have a 4.0L ranger from what i can tell the ranger is faster i started looking into it it's probably the rear end that has a lot to do with it rangers have 373 or 410 rear ends my dakota only has a 355 or smaller
spuddud19 5 months ago
i still feel like the 4.0L v6 ranger is faster than the 5.2 v8 dakota
spuddud19 5 months ago
@spuddud19 it could be very well be faster i'm not sure.....but i don't think he floored it completely in this video, shifted out of first at 4K and had another 1K rpm to go if floored....i would say to look at another 5.2 0-60 but I couldn't find another on here lol
tbirdsport302 5 months ago
What is the fastest it will go?
adambomb3030 5 months ago
Look @ ur face
mopartshemi2 10 months ago
@mopartshemi2 look at my face?
tbirdsport302 10 months ago
Look at the gas gauge.
TheDavidMN 1 year ago
@TheDavidMN Im sure the reason you saw it move was because the sensors went back and did an incorrect reading because the truck was being floored
metaltera86 5 months ago
@metaltera86 I was referring to it falling because the amount of gas you probably went through while flooring it. (jokingly...) I have a 94 318 as well with now 98k miles. Gets about 15-17mpg... ..
TheDavidMN 2 weeks ago
I have a mark III edition with the 318 with shorty header tru duel into 2 flowmasters dumped under with cold air intake system
ur2ndurlast 1 year ago
@ur2ndurlast cool!! nothing better than true dual flowmasters :)... Im not too terribly familiar with dakotas, what is the mark III edition?
tbirdsport302 1 year ago
That's quick just like 94 Dakota slt v8
alex1228891 1 year ago
not bad....2WD with smaller/stock size tires?
joehan09 2 years ago
yup sure is. 2WD and stock wheels and tires, this is definitely the fastest older truck that i've ever ridden in!
tbirdsport302 2 years ago