Added: 4 months ago
From: cherylsullenger
Views: 3,613
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sounds like good use of taxpayer money. It would cost far more than 16K to provide medical services to a Down's Syndrome baby.

  • Comment removed

  • A familiar face is there. Shelley Sella, the monster from hell. She stabbed a living aborted baby to death with a pair of scissors. More than merely take the life of an innocent child, abortion abuses, beats, and robs women. And then leaves them lying on the side of the road to suffer alone.The physical risks of abortion ... breast cancer, pelvic infection, infertility, ectopic pregnancy and even suicide!. Watch the Documentary: Blood Money + The Silent Scream then you will know about Abortion

  • VERY Disturbing! Watch "180" on YouTube.

  • How much would it cost this woman to give up her baby for adoption?

    NOTHING!

    The Down Syndrome Society of Greater Cincinnati has over 600 families waiting to adopt a baby like this.

  • @leticiavelasquez It would cost the women nothing but it would cost society in the tens of thousands to support a special needs child as a ward of the state.

  • I hope the mothers go to hell..

  • absolute bullshit.I hope they go to hell

  • yeah, it's makes sense--how much with the disable baby would cost the state after birth to death?

    if a woman doesn't want a down syndrome baby...she has that right, it's living inside her body and it's none of your business---since you can't legally stop it.

  • @FREEAMERICANOW69

    Point 1:So, it's ok to get rid of a life just because there's a disability? What are we living in, Germany in the 1930's/40s?

    Point 2:Now life is based on a price?

    Point 3: Just because it's "her body" doesn't mean there isn't another life in her.

    Point 4: A 30 week unborn child? There's children born before than that live outside of the womb. -_-

    Point 5: Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's right.

  • @tazluvpizza The down syndrome child will suffer and live a tormented life because of this disease. The women might not be able to take care of a special needs child and her other children could suffer as a result. Also, putting up the baby for adoption will allow an unsympathetic, abusive family to use it as a meal ticket, is that more humane?

  • @Clairvoyant23 Actually, it's a myth to say if one has down syndrome he/she will have a misrable life. Most people with down syndrome are happy. Besides, ds tests before birth aren't always accurate.

    So, it's ok to get rid of the unborn who may not even have ds. What other groups should be aborted? If an unborn child has cererbral palsy or autism detected before birth is it ok for them to be aborted? Are we going to get rid of every life that is undesirable? What group will it stop at?

  • @Clairvoyant23 Let me ask you this. Is it more humane to never let the unborn have a chance at life just because they're not perfect. Did you hear about the young man with down syndrome (this was on HLN) who has his own restaurant? They have goals and are just like you and me. We all have something wrong with us, doesn't me it's right to kill any of us. If anyone who was imperfect got killed, who would be left on the earth?

  • @tazluvpizza People arguing the Down's Syndrome baby shouldn't be aborted also seem to oppose universal healthcare and raising taxes to pay for it. Ever occur to you a woman in the situation posed by that caller might carry that baby to term if she were assured that healthcare for a live baby & her were provided? IF we were living in 1930's Germany, that healthcare would be available. BTW, How about Edwards Syndrome? IMO definitely abortion.

  • @robertmike57 If we were living in 1930's Germany women would be being forced to be sterilized. Is that right to do? In Germany during that time period you do realize what happened to people correct? We'd be in pure socialism if we lived like the Germans in the 1930s...

    Edwards Syndrome. Let me ask you something. It's ok now to abort the unborn who are deemed "unworthy" of life.. When is it going to go further? When are we going to get rid of the unworthy out of the womb?

    cont.

  • @robertmike57 If we lived in Germany, in the 30's, we'd be killing off the physically/ mentally disabled (anyone not seen fit to live). Is it wise to go down that road? Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

    You don't think those with Edwards Syndrome should have a chance. Who else shouldn't have a chance? Ex. autistic people/crippled people. How broad is this going to get? Who are we to say who can live/die? How can we as humans make that dicision?

  • @robertmike57 As for the universal healthcare people are probably opposed because that is socialism. And, as history shows that doesn't work.

  • I thought that society considerd people who practiced eugenics "monsters." I guess we're cool with it now.

  • what an outrage

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more