actually the actress who played Lo is 15 playing a 12yearold, and while i agree that she is too old to be Lo from the book, they couldn't very well have an actual 12 year old doing those kind of scenes with 50 year old Jeremy Irons, even if he is a babe.
What Humbert told Nabokov is Humbert´s version. We will never know the exact truth.But, reading the first pages of the book, when Humbert describes the nymphets, we can see tha t he is a sick man.Humbert thought sorcerer seducing teenagers were abundant, and that idea is transferred into the movie. Lolita is a pretty girl that seduces while teasing, enticing the old fart to fall into sinful conduct, the old far not having a chance. I think that very few girls of age 12-13 can do that.
Anyone who says this film is criminal is so lost. I am a mother of a son. I am 46 years old. I would never cross inappropriate lines. But I understand that sometimes in life, as is said in Irons' film "Damage", there are things we just can control. And this IS a story of Love. This isn't pedophilia. Besides which, who are we to say at what age people can and cannot fall in love? Lolita and Humbert LOVE each other, and no one should defile that, ever.
@Medusafern yea . Prophet Mohammed and his wife Khadija LOVED each other like nobody ever love . and then some morons keep criticize their marriage ! ازدواجية معايير
@gregorygutkin what the hell are you talking about? She's a young teen girl, she still supposed to have a little baby fat anyway. And I'm sorry, but were you there when Nabokov decided what she was supposed to look like? hmm? no? ok. shut the crap up.
It's not her body or her character. It's that she was love and nostalgia incarnate. Humbert previously loved a girl named Annabelle, who was Lolita's prototype, so much that he spent his life looking for her after her death. But he looked for her as he remembered her (a teenager). Unfortunately the pedophilia thing is too much of a red herring for some people.
Dominique Swain is perfect as Dolores, and this version is far superior to Kubricks's. The novel is exceptional, Nabokov's writing gives us some of the most beautiful prose ever committed to paper. And to think he wasn't even a native English speaker.
all he wants in the movie is the young girls body. he deals with her difficult character just to gwt to the body. the whole movie focuses on her body.
@ukrainianZAIKA I don't know about that, I think he "loved" her for her childish personality too, I mean it's easy enough to find a woman who looks young, just look at the actress, she was 17 or 18 in real life. But I do agree that the move is very focused on her body. It's like they're tying to make us see her from humbert's point of view so we don't immediately go "ewww pedo" or something.
The 1997 version was actually a pseudo-adaptation of the book. So, the director made her look a bit older. Something like 14 rather than 12. Plus, most people would accept the movie more if she looked a bit older. :/.
Well, she has to be. Do you really think they'll let an actual 12-13 year old actress play the part of a girl who has to sleep with her step father because she's his lustful nymphet in his own derranged sexual and pedophiliac fantasy? I think not.
@StellaSimon5 yeah just a little but keep in mind lo was 12 so she doesnt look that much older plus they had to find a actress that could play a 12/13 year old lo and then play her at 18 so . i think this really works
Comment removed
mortXyuriXluver 2 months ago
Dominique Swan was 15, Lolita in the movie is 14. In the book she's 12, but they changed it.
alifelessnecessary 4 months ago
actually the actress who played Lo is 15 playing a 12yearold, and while i agree that she is too old to be Lo from the book, they couldn't very well have an actual 12 year old doing those kind of scenes with 50 year old Jeremy Irons, even if he is a babe.
mikimaree 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What Humbert told Nabokov is Humbert´s version. We will never know the exact truth.But, reading the first pages of the book, when Humbert describes the nymphets, we can see tha t he is a sick man.Humbert thought sorcerer seducing teenagers were abundant, and that idea is transferred into the movie. Lolita is a pretty girl that seduces while teasing, enticing the old fart to fall into sinful conduct, the old far not having a chance. I think that very few girls of age 12-13 can do that.
powerdriller10 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone who says this film is criminal is so lost. I am a mother of a son. I am 46 years old. I would never cross inappropriate lines. But I understand that sometimes in life, as is said in Irons' film "Damage", there are things we just can control. And this IS a story of Love. This isn't pedophilia. Besides which, who are we to say at what age people can and cannot fall in love? Lolita and Humbert LOVE each other, and no one should defile that, ever.
Medusafern 6 months ago
@Medusafern hello. couldn't agree more with this comment xxx peace and love
jenandthumper 5 months ago
@Medusafern yea . Prophet Mohammed and his wife Khadija LOVED each other like nobody ever love . and then some morons keep criticize their marriage ! ازدواجية معايير
CameMyTurn 3 months ago
that music is lovely whats it called and where can i find it?
LeelaDebris 7 months ago
@LeelaDebris It's "Love In The Morning" (by Ennio Morricone)
madlener07 7 months ago 6
shes too fat to be lo from the book
gregorygutkin 7 months ago
@gregorygutkin Fat? How much thinner could she be? Jesus.
Logos87X 7 months ago
@gregorygutkin what the hell are you talking about? She's a young teen girl, she still supposed to have a little baby fat anyway. And I'm sorry, but were you there when Nabokov decided what she was supposed to look like? hmm? no? ok. shut the crap up.
roxxibea 7 months ago
It's not her body or her character. It's that she was love and nostalgia incarnate. Humbert previously loved a girl named Annabelle, who was Lolita's prototype, so much that he spent his life looking for her after her death. But he looked for her as he remembered her (a teenager). Unfortunately the pedophilia thing is too much of a red herring for some people.
listen2this 10 months ago 3
Dominique Swain is perfect as Dolores, and this version is far superior to Kubricks's. The novel is exceptional, Nabokov's writing gives us some of the most beautiful prose ever committed to paper. And to think he wasn't even a native English speaker.
vordman 10 months ago 24
@vordman THANK YOU.
roxxibea 7 months ago
I don't remember this part in the novel...
uloveshawna 10 months ago
all he wants in the movie is the young girls body. he deals with her difficult character just to gwt to the body. the whole movie focuses on her body.
ukrainianZAIKA 11 months ago
@ukrainianZAIKA I don't know about that, I think he "loved" her for her childish personality too, I mean it's easy enough to find a woman who looks young, just look at the actress, she was 17 or 18 in real life. But I do agree that the move is very focused on her body. It's like they're tying to make us see her from humbert's point of view so we don't immediately go "ewww pedo" or something.
RandoriHyuuga 11 months ago 2
This movie is dirty but also good.
KISSMEMYFOOL69 11 months ago 2
Get over her age, you unhappy pedobears.
amelitaz 11 months ago 3
She's 16, cus' she's now 30...and the film was made in 1997 ...
The novel is so good...and the film too...
Monik07iu 11 months ago
You sure she wasn't nearly 18.
phil123711 1 year ago
@phil123711 the actress was, in the movie lo is 14
RandoriHyuuga 11 months ago
The music is SO touching, GREAT movie !
derris 1 year ago 2
she's 15 going on 16 at the time of shooting the movie
IReallyHateMirrors 1 year ago
She looks like a random teen, not a nynphet.
blipjoe 1 year ago
Yes who wrote it?i wanna read it
Baahawill 1 year ago
@Baahawill Vladimir Nabokov
itssoeasy69 1 year ago
This scene is great,I can`t see why they canceled it..
walkingSurrealism 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
she looks a bit too old to be the Lo from the book
StellaSimon5 1 year ago 25
@StellaSimon5 they couldnt use areal 12 year old for legal purposes but i think she was 17
gregorygutkin 1 year ago
@gregorygutkin she was actually fifteen if i'm not mistaken when they filmed the movie
fullfiledprophecies 1 year ago
@fullfiledprophecies She was 17:)
kaylawayla23 1 year ago
@StellaSimon5
The 1997 version was actually a pseudo-adaptation of the book. So, the director made her look a bit older. Something like 14 rather than 12. Plus, most people would accept the movie more if she looked a bit older. :/.
cathrein 1 year ago
@StellaSimon5 Right but she plays very good. And in the first version of the movie, the girl looks even older !
emimichan007 1 year ago
@emimichan007 true that, I really didn't like Sue Lyons as lolita she looked too mature, Dominique Swain has a innocent gamine side to her
celynadwell 1 year ago 2
@StellaSimon5 She was really 17 when she played this part.Who's the book by?I'd like to read it.
kaylawayla23 1 year ago
@StellaSimon5 She is. they had to make her older for some reason to do with legalities,. She's 14.
aniseedrock23250 11 months ago
@StellaSimon5
Well, she has to be. Do you really think they'll let an actual 12-13 year old actress play the part of a girl who has to sleep with her step father because she's his lustful nymphet in his own derranged sexual and pedophiliac fantasy? I think not.
CoquettishGame 7 months ago
@StellaSimon5 yeah just a little but keep in mind lo was 12 so she doesnt look that much older plus they had to find a actress that could play a 12/13 year old lo and then play her at 18 so . i think this really works
LeelaDebris 7 months ago
@StellaSimon5 Lo in the movie is older than Lo in the book. 14 versus 12, I think.
LoriSweetPea 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
she's such a fucking whore
bitterxreilly 1 year ago
@bitterxreilly HE is the pedophile
sweet0surprise 7 months ago
AMEIZING¡¡¡
Saramuussa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how many deleted secnes is there?
queenofsheba1000 2 years ago 35
@queenofsheba1000
how many feet scenes!! man hahaha
robertomarciano 11 months ago
@queenofsheba1000 Not enough. They should have deleted this entire POS movie.
Engage777 7 months ago