i used to shoot canon and nikon was my back up,since the 14-24mm 24-70 and 70-200 vr lenses are sharp as tack and there is nothing that canon can offer, canon is my back up now,who cares about 18 megapixels or 21? if that would be the case i would get the D3X but my d700 and d3 gets the job done...nikon better pictures canon better movies top line nikon and top line canon user
seriously people need to know the difference between a 1D mark III which has 10 fps and a 1.3x crop factor. and the FULL FRAME 1Ds mark III which has 5 fps
hahahahahahahahaha its hilarious how you people swearing at each other there, simply put, both cameras are great, but then again who the f**k am i to speak when i have a d90 :p
@AlaskanTKDKid I think someone should do a 10 second retarded test of a 1dIII vs. a Nikon D90. I'm also confused why he jazzed up the d3 in post.... oh, of course, it's because he's just a "nick-con" fan boy.
If you want to save some money or just get a better profit margin, get this $5000+ camera brand NEW for just over $2000 at alibaba.com/products/eos_1ds_mark_3/US----------------------------(.)html
The Canon 1Ds and the Canon 1D are two different bodies. The crop frame sensor 1D Mark 3 will do 10 fps, but the full frame 1Ds Mark 3 will only manage 5 fps.
@lg123xyz ....yeah, and why do those cinematographers use those ridiculous Arri Alexas when they could get a decent clip with an HVX200a. Obviously you are not a professional sports shooter.
@lg123xyz@lg123xyz I can't respond to that because I don't understand your diction. Is English your second language? Please take some more time to articulate your thoughts. Assuming you are taking issue with my statement that most sports and pjs do in fact exploit the high frame rate, again, I can assure you that 10fps is a huge factor. I urge you to check out sportshooter-dot-com, maybe post your thoughts there.
You've proclaimed that "most" 1D Mark IV owners don't utilize the high frame rate. That is comically inaccurate. They do. On a related note, have you posted your comments at the sports shooter website's forum yet? I'd love it if you could just post a new thread there, titled something like "Most ID Mark IV owners don't utilize the high frame rate." The followup posts should be quite entertaining.
@seethebright I guess you don't know how to read. I said and I'll say it again....If you're doing a specific type of fast action photography you might use that feature. But since most people don't do purely sports or high action speed photography they won't NEED 10 fps. They'll use it once in a while, you ask 100 people I'll bet most don't NEED 10 fps.
@seethebright Again, you're talking about a specific type of photography, most do not do sports or fast action type shots so you should speak for yourself and not the masses as a whole. Good if you enjoy that feature but my point remains... most don't need 10fps!!! I hope that was clear enough for you to comprehend.
@lg123xyz I comprehend that you are fucking wrong. Can someone please throw me a bone here? Or are there really hordes of DSLR hobbyists out there who have plunked down $5K for a flagship DSLR and don't even care about the frame rate? The "masses" don't own this camera, lg123. It is marketed to professionals, namely sports shooters and wildlife photographers on assignment. We spend that kind of money willingly because it has feature sets that matter, and that includes frame rate.
@seethebright Well... I guess you really DON'T comprehend you stubborn mule. You might wanna get some of your boyfriends from sports photography site to come support you here - cuz many do wanna buy the latest and greatest and don't use half the features you mentioned including your beloved 10fps, this just doesn't happen in photography but in all types of gadgets. People who just want to buy the best "thinking" they might need it but they don't, they just wanna have "the best"!! Comprendes?
so ein dummschwätzer, na klar ist die canon ein bisschen langsamer, aber nicht auf die geschwindigkeit sondern auf die bildqualität kommts an. blödmann
die canon ist in den preisspannen 500-4000€ nicht zu schlagen, wenns aber in den profibereich mit 6000€ geht, ist nikon nicht mehr zu halten, aber was bringen uns jetzt die bildfolgen? das hat nichts über die kamera auszusagen. stell deine reviews wo anders rein, wenn du nichts gescheites bringen kannst.
What the hell was the reason for this nonsense????
What a strange thing to say, "This is a very auditory thing."
My question is, what does he actually prove, other than if you buy a camera, you might need to have a beefy sound on your MP3 player so you can make it sound bettererererererer. Go figure...
He is correct in the speed. He said the EOS-1Ds Mark III does 5fps continuous however it is pushing 21.1 Megapixels compared to the D3 which is only 12.
To be fair they should have compared this camera to the D3x which has 24.5 megapixels. The D3x does 5fps as well and up to 7 in DX crop mode. These cameras are not marketed to the same markets. In my opinion the D3 is more for sports and the 1Ds Mark 3 is a studio Camera but that's my opinion.
man, you can compare a fast camera with slow camera. i know both are full frame but the purpose of both camera are different. d3 is for journalist and sports photography but the 1ds is for high-res studio shoots. are you blind or dumb? if you don't then compare it with the canon 1d.
What for you guys to compare SLR. I own a D3x, D3s, D300s, D700 and D3. Overall, the Images that will uploaded to images Websites or post in magazines, no one can tell the differences. What we care about is the Photographers.
How about this, ISO and noise performance = Nikon > Canon, Speed = Nikon > Canon. Megapixils don't matter for shit. 10-12 MP is PLENTY for anyone! You can make a billboard with a 6 MP camera. Canon is just taking advantage of the people.
@cm374360 True the 1D mark 3 does do 10fps. but this is the 1Ds mark 3. It changes from a crop sensor for full frame and from 10 to 21mp. So the 1Ds mark 3 does only top out at 5.
hey. you compare full frame camera with top class reporter camera?.. You must be joking, man! 1Ds is designed for studio photography as D3x. D3 is reporters' choice as well as Canon 1D.
for me - in terms of sound - the most important topic is... noise level! I'm shooting stage performances, concerts (including classical music) so mirror-claping sounds are not welcome at all!!! Do you have any d3s sound samples compared to d300 ?
ummm...if you guys wanted to count pixels look at the d3x...24mp...... and you will never beat the ISO of a Nikon...no noise at all in very high ISO. i like both cameras, and canon has great picture quality but Nikon doesn't need as high of megapixel for a great image and that's a fact...
In this video Nikon has a fast FPS but pixels are less as the Mark IIIs has slower FPS with higher pixels this video should of compared the Mark III and the Nikon as the Mark III would of stomped the Nikon.
Nikon d3 problems: First of the images I got from the camera were incredible, amazing clarity and the noise was hardly anywhere at 6400 compaired with previous digi's. So the final image was great really impressed.
BUT the focusing? I was shooting with a 70-200 2.8 vr and the new 24-70 2.8 lens' they refused to find focus in low light and were seeking for hours. I set the camera focus on one point ai so it would focus quicker and i could manually adjust.
all you fucking bitches touting this or that. fact is, cameras in this range dont matter. it's all about the photographer. if you suck, you suck not matter what camera you have in your hand
I absolutely agree with your comments. The camera is only a tool, it all comes down to the person behind the camera. I think Canon has the potential to deliver great photos as well as sharp resolution.
what a sad twat!!...he prob lives with his mum and plays with a trainset at home....listen to the sound of a camera..why...the quiter the better ..what if your doing wild life shots...Oooohhh better be qiet dont want to frighten the birds away...steady....click click click click click click!!!!!!!....woahhhhh...jesus they flown away!!!!..bloody noisy camera shit!!!!!...grow up nerdy boy!
The D3X is a disgrace, a retarded D3 sold almost double the price. I guess it's not their fault really though, some complained the D3 "doesn't have enough meeegapeexels" so they had to pander to the retards.
well if you think the D3x is a disgrace then you're pretty lame,
the D3x is above all in its class, if you actually fucking know what you're looking at the D3x isn't aimed just to have a higher pixel count, its aimed to have double the quality of the D3, it pulls out 90% the same shots of what a mamiya 645 AFD with a Phase One P45+ back, almost, the 1Ds mk3 can't even pull out half of that, so yeah as many idiots think the D3x is a disgrace, its infact continuing the best model
also the D3x was designed for studio, so 99% of the time you're working at ISO100. compare a shot from the 1Ds mk3 to the D3x and you'll still pull out even more detail with the D3x, my D3 and D700 still pull out atleast 5x sharper images than a mk3 so yeha
Yeah the 1DS Mk III is 21 MP, that's why it's only 5 fps. The D3 only has 12 MP so it can do 9 fps because there's less information to transfer. FYI The Canon 1D Mk III shoots 10fps, which beats Nikon, obviously.
For the record, Nikons are mostly for women or men/boys with small hands. Look at the Nikon D300, it's a toy compared to the Canon 1d series.
erm....was that it?
simonsgl 1 month ago
i used to shoot canon and nikon was my back up,since the 14-24mm 24-70 and 70-200 vr lenses are sharp as tack and there is nothing that canon can offer, canon is my back up now,who cares about 18 megapixels or 21? if that would be the case i would get the D3X but my d700 and d3 gets the job done...nikon better pictures canon better movies top line nikon and top line canon user
mettalliko 4 months ago
why to compare Nikon D3 vs Canon EOS 1Ds MarkIII. 1ds it is not for sport. Compare with EOS 1D MarkIII and it will be quite differente...10fps
fdpr606 4 months ago
Cannon
totchikits 5 months ago
Get a decent camcorder first!!!!
KatiushaVN4 6 months ago
the canon 1ds mark III has a higher fps than what this showed
ExtraEme 6 months ago
i buy a camera for the sound, yeah right, im not an idiot
digitalwiz 6 months ago
What a dork, haha.
nintendodude01 7 months ago
i use canon but i think Nikon Camera are sexy and well build, too expensive for me especially their lens....
DBOATYZ 8 months ago
fagg
matthewblessssss 8 months ago
With Canon, you Cannot !!
With Nikon , you Nice on !!
sdei777 10 months ago
@sdei777 Oi Noink! yes We Can! on!
vadimggg 6 months ago
With Canon, you can!
NeoMullen 1 year ago 2
i've just farted
PSEvangelist 1 year ago 7
Canon is cheap. u r the dumb fark!
lol!
stevegyro1 1 year ago
seriously people need to know the difference between a 1D mark III which has 10 fps and a 1.3x crop factor. and the FULL FRAME 1Ds mark III which has 5 fps
mindwaveESEA 1 year ago 3
As long as I know the 1D mark III does get up to 10FPS. This is fucking propaganda. I'm a Nikon boy but this is just bullshit :P
marclippens 1 year ago
this is not a real comparision of shutterspeed
Sniperkiller300 1 year ago
Does the Nikon shoot 11 fps in full frame mode? If so, that means it's faster at FF than the canon 1d at 1.3x?
seethebright 1 year ago
hahahahahahahahaha its hilarious how you people swearing at each other there, simply put, both cameras are great, but then again who the f**k am i to speak when i have a d90 :p
MrCJ1988 1 year ago
fuck you
MegaElkana 1 year ago
ur 1Ds mkiii is fucked up
chocolatteking 1 year ago
Why wasn't this a test of the 1D Mark III versus the D3?
AlaskanTKDKid 1 year ago
@AlaskanTKDKid I think someone should do a 10 second retarded test of a 1dIII vs. a Nikon D90. I'm also confused why he jazzed up the d3 in post.... oh, of course, it's because he's just a "nick-con" fan boy.
seethebright 1 year ago
WHY you made this video in a cimitery ?
leomadnesss 1 year ago
ooooooh yer baby give me some shutter noises lol watta fag. 1ds obviously rapes the fuck out of the nikon
sillentkller9 1 year ago
The 1D Mk iii can shoot at 10FPS !
GraphicCoconut 1 year ago 2
@GraphicCoconut
Yep, it can. The 1ds III cannot.
seethebright 1 year ago
If you want to save some money or just get a better profit margin, get this $5000+ camera brand NEW for just over $2000 at alibaba.com/products/eos_1ds_mark_3/US----------------------------(.)html
Notice the ( ).
Have a good day
ColdCypher 1 year ago
The Canon 1Ds and the Canon 1D are two different bodies. The crop frame sensor 1D Mark 3 will do 10 fps, but the full frame 1Ds Mark 3 will only manage 5 fps.
xXxPigeonKickerxXx 1 year ago
What the heck is the obsession with the speed... most probably don't even use it.
lg123xyz 1 year ago
@lg123xyz But its good to know you have it:O)
quickshooter100 1 year ago
@lg123xyz ....yeah, and why do those cinematographers use those ridiculous Arri Alexas when they could get a decent clip with an HVX200a. Obviously you are not a professional sports shooter.
seethebright 1 year ago
@seethebright I'm talking about one feature not a complete model, learn to read.
lg123xyz 1 year ago
@lg123xyz You say the "most probably don't even use it". Let me assure you--we do. I read quite well, thank you.
seethebright 1 year ago
@seethebright You might be most don't. So I'm right again.
lg123xyz 1 year ago
@lg123xyz @lg123xyz I can't respond to that because I don't understand your diction. Is English your second language? Please take some more time to articulate your thoughts. Assuming you are taking issue with my statement that most sports and pjs do in fact exploit the high frame rate, again, I can assure you that 10fps is a huge factor. I urge you to check out sportshooter-dot-com, maybe post your thoughts there.
seethebright 1 year ago
@seethebright You got that part right... you should've stopped at "I can't respond to that because I don't understand."
lg123xyz 1 year ago
@lg123xyz
You've proclaimed that "most" 1D Mark IV owners don't utilize the high frame rate. That is comically inaccurate. They do. On a related note, have you posted your comments at the sports shooter website's forum yet? I'd love it if you could just post a new thread there, titled something like "Most ID Mark IV owners don't utilize the high frame rate." The followup posts should be quite entertaining.
seethebright 1 year ago
@seethebright I guess you don't know how to read. I said and I'll say it again....If you're doing a specific type of fast action photography you might use that feature. But since most people don't do purely sports or high action speed photography they won't NEED 10 fps. They'll use it once in a while, you ask 100 people I'll bet most don't NEED 10 fps.
lg123xyz 1 year ago
@seethebright Again, you're talking about a specific type of photography, most do not do sports or fast action type shots so you should speak for yourself and not the masses as a whole. Good if you enjoy that feature but my point remains... most don't need 10fps!!! I hope that was clear enough for you to comprehend.
lg123xyz 1 year ago
@lg123xyz I comprehend that you are fucking wrong. Can someone please throw me a bone here? Or are there really hordes of DSLR hobbyists out there who have plunked down $5K for a flagship DSLR and don't even care about the frame rate? The "masses" don't own this camera, lg123. It is marketed to professionals, namely sports shooters and wildlife photographers on assignment. We spend that kind of money willingly because it has feature sets that matter, and that includes frame rate.
seethebright 1 year ago
@seethebright Well... I guess you really DON'T comprehend you stubborn mule. You might wanna get some of your boyfriends from sports photography site to come support you here - cuz many do wanna buy the latest and greatest and don't use half the features you mentioned including your beloved 10fps, this just doesn't happen in photography but in all types of gadgets. People who just want to buy the best "thinking" they might need it but they don't, they just wanna have "the best"!! Comprendes?
lg123xyz 1 year ago
Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 5fps? My Canon 20D does that you dumb fuck! The EOS 1Ds Mark III does 11fps! Fuck you and your Nikon!
c0LdPlayR0cKs 1 year ago 2
@c0LdPlayR0cKs LOL, you obv know jackshit about cameras!!!
quickshooter100 1 year ago
@c0LdPlayR0cKs Uhhhhh, no. The 1dIII does 10. The 1dSIII does 5 or 6.
seethebright 1 year ago
yah more time of my life gone to stupid rubbish people post up! this is like comparing an orange to an onion on taste factor!
Damag381 1 year ago
so ein dummschwätzer, na klar ist die canon ein bisschen langsamer, aber nicht auf die geschwindigkeit sondern auf die bildqualität kommts an. blödmann
die canon ist in den preisspannen 500-4000€ nicht zu schlagen, wenns aber in den profibereich mit 6000€ geht, ist nikon nicht mehr zu halten, aber was bringen uns jetzt die bildfolgen? das hat nichts über die kamera auszusagen. stell deine reviews wo anders rein, wenn du nichts gescheites bringen kannst.
TheBurnout96 1 year ago
fuck nikon
StrangeDrawingArt 1 year ago
stupid review ever.
piak423 1 year ago
Comment removed
handsheal 1 year ago
@handsheal big deal, it's clear you waste a lot more than that on a regular basis
unheard128 1 year ago
What the hell was the reason for this nonsense????
What a strange thing to say, "This is a very auditory thing."
My question is, what does he actually prove, other than if you buy a camera, you might need to have a beefy sound on your MP3 player so you can make it sound bettererererererer. Go figure...
SuperSnowybear 1 year ago
went from canon to nikon and im so glad i did!! canons just lack the essence of the tool!
quickshooter100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@quickshooter100 not you again... fuck your mom
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago
He is correct in the speed. He said the EOS-1Ds Mark III does 5fps continuous however it is pushing 21.1 Megapixels compared to the D3 which is only 12.
To be fair they should have compared this camera to the D3x which has 24.5 megapixels. The D3x does 5fps as well and up to 7 in DX crop mode. These cameras are not marketed to the same markets. In my opinion the D3 is more for sports and the 1Ds Mark 3 is a studio Camera but that's my opinion.
sheldonalleyne 1 year ago 2
WTF? this guy obviously knows NOTHING about cameras, trying to compare the two by the sound it makes!
scottishrailfan123 1 year ago
man, you can compare a fast camera with slow camera. i know both are full frame but the purpose of both camera are different. d3 is for journalist and sports photography but the 1ds is for high-res studio shoots. are you blind or dumb? if you don't then compare it with the canon 1d.
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago
@Xyb3rTeCh
absolutely right :)
TheBurnout96 1 year ago
I luv It too lol
Axxex 1 year ago
What for you guys to compare SLR. I own a D3x, D3s, D300s, D700 and D3. Overall, the Images that will uploaded to images Websites or post in magazines, no one can tell the differences. What we care about is the Photographers.
Nikon,
- Best ISO performance
- Nano Crystal Coating lens
Canon,
- Higher Megapixels
- Affordable lenses
MuhdRifhan 1 year ago
I'm a Nikon guy for a long time. I'm glad I switched to Canon...Canon gets the job done!!!
kenfrancis74 1 year ago 8
ohh yeah... that's absolutely right
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago
@kenfrancis74 what happened to you liking nikon? ( i also switched)
ihateyaacov 1 year ago
How about this, ISO and noise performance = Nikon > Canon, Speed = Nikon > Canon. Megapixils don't matter for shit. 10-12 MP is PLENTY for anyone! You can make a billboard with a 6 MP camera. Canon is just taking advantage of the people.
paintbasstard 1 year ago
the nikon has more fps - but its low resolution
sasktank 2 years ago
k te den por el culo maricon canon es mejor soplapollas
boscomunion 2 years ago
Fuck You Canon Hater :@
idopunky 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i love nikon d3 :D
horrace886 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy fucking retarded? the 1D goes upto 10fps... not 5... i know the nikon is 11... but this makes canons look cheep... dumbfuck...
cm374360 2 years ago 23
this is 1Ds.. not 1D
argihr 2 years ago
are you fucking retarded..? he says 1dS mkiii...21mp 5fps, etcetc
not the 1dmkiii which is 10fps
yes its a little unfair to compare the burst rate of the d3 to the 1dsmkiii
but now the 1dmkiv is here suck those nuts nikon!!!
tsunamiplayer3 2 years ago
Uh, D3X owns all. And for low light and speed, D3s owns all.
xjoncamposx 2 years ago
Isnt it obvious? He's a Nikon user, you think he's going to showcase the Canon power against his D3S? Of course not. Favoritism my friend. ;)
TemplarReturns 1 year ago
@cm374360
He did say 1D"s" ... which does go at 5fps ...
xelaeel 1 year ago
@cm374360 the 1ds only shoots at 5. the 1d mark 3 does 10.
rinceresource 1 year ago
@cm374360 He said the EOS 1Ds Mark III which is 5fps, so he is correct. Not the 1D Mark 4 which is 10fps.
1Ds Mark III is full frame at 21mega pixel.
the 1D Mark 4 is a 1.3 crop factor.
Cheers
sheldonalleyne 1 year ago
@cm374360 True the 1D mark 3 does do 10fps. but this is the 1Ds mark 3. It changes from a crop sensor for full frame and from 10 to 21mp. So the 1Ds mark 3 does only top out at 5.
clownscared001 1 year ago
@cm374360 its 1ds not 1d.
mariusgp5 1 year ago
@cm374360 You are the one that's retarded that can't even read that it's the 1Ds Mark III, not the 1D. Look again, idiot.
Tristate1551 1 year ago
@cm374360 it's the 1DS mark III has 5 FPS FULL FRAME. 1D mark III has 10 fps 1.3 crop factor. D3 has 9 Frames per second.
get your facts right please
mindwaveESEA 1 year ago
@cm374360
lol it is a 1ds not a 1d.
tyhaegs 1 year ago
5 fps? what are u a moron?
mikel064 2 years ago
Silly debate. I picked Nikon cuz I liked the red mark on the handle. Looks sexy.
tinolangmanok2010 2 years ago 17
hey. you compare full frame camera with top class reporter camera?.. You must be joking, man! 1Ds is designed for studio photography as D3x. D3 is reporters' choice as well as Canon 1D.
i0wa88 2 years ago
He's only comparing the sound they both make. Why you going crazy?
xjoncamposx 2 years ago
no hes comparing the frames per second
xxxskat34lifexxx 2 years ago
for me - in terms of sound - the most important topic is... noise level! I'm shooting stage performances, concerts (including classical music) so mirror-claping sounds are not welcome at all!!! Do you have any d3s sound samples compared to d300 ?
GrendelPL 2 years ago
What!? How it sounds? Are you mad man? That is the last thing I am interested in when comparing the two cams. What a waste of bloody time
Pileofdiscs 2 years ago
ummm...if you guys wanted to count pixels look at the d3x...24mp...... and you will never beat the ISO of a Nikon...no noise at all in very high ISO. i like both cameras, and canon has great picture quality but Nikon doesn't need as high of megapixel for a great image and that's a fact...
e170724 2 years ago 2
Surely if FPS was your paramount concern you should of used the 1D mk3 not the 1Ds mk3, which is obviously going for higher resolution than FPS.
jaypaniczone 2 years ago
Superb review! I'll buy the Nikon!
gliderama 2 years ago
i love canon eos 1d mark lll
Liuxs69 2 years ago
This guy is no fool. Heck, with over $10,000 worth of camera gear on my neck, I too would have chosen the safety of a cemetery for my video.
brharte 2 years ago
some fuckin review. canon's image quality will always out do nikon
cmanleyspy 2 years ago
Umm. Where in the description does it say "review"?
brharte 2 years ago
you have to compare to the 1d3!!!
The 1ds3 has 21mp
mixmaxdix 2 years ago
In this video Nikon has a fast FPS but pixels are less as the Mark IIIs has slower FPS with higher pixels this video should of compared the Mark III and the Nikon as the Mark III would of stomped the Nikon.
shaneruizimagery 2 years ago 2
Nikon or Canon...I don't care...both are excellent brands making excellent cameras.
geonlansis 2 years ago 2
Damn if i saw that guy id mug him
Foreezybeezy1 2 years ago
You should compare the D3 to 1D MK3, that would be a fair match. D3 has 12mp 1Ds MK3 has 21mp
ptrefftz 2 years ago
I love it! xD
MungozZz 2 years ago
how fucking rich is this guy?
philphie 2 years ago
You can tell the guy just for the location he chose
orcacg 2 years ago
1D is not a full frame camera if you set D3 as DX format it can reach 11fps, however fps doesn't mean which camera is better than other.
specrs14 2 years ago
? yes it is. the 1dmk3 is a full fram...i think it has been since the mk2
sacredgeometry 2 years ago
EOS-1D Mark III is 1.3x crop factor, not full frame.. you probably confuse with D1s which is full frame but with much slower fps.
specrs14 2 years ago
yes which it is :P i thought you where referring to his camera
sacredgeometry 2 years ago
does if its sports photography ur doin.
Aberdemon1988 2 years ago
1d Mark 3 5 fps what a load of crap. This guy is still a virgin.
aarontrousselot123 2 years ago
1ds Mk 3 does only have 5 frames per second since it is a 21 megapixel camera =O
jewmonkey125 2 years ago
are you fucking stupid? 5 fps? dude..get a point and shoot... no clue what your talking about
germandude1982 2 years ago 2
if you want to compare for the shutter speed of D3 you should compare with 1D Mark III (not for 1Ds)
atit106 2 years ago 2
agree the 1ds mark III is also shooting more then twice the data in each shot then the d3. Very biased
acaccavale 2 years ago
"I did not have sexual relations with that camera..."
lalala8411 2 years ago
Who gives a flying fuck about the sound. You want a camera that can take the photos you want to take.
madcatmotions 2 years ago
wow the d3 was amazing
homersimpson587 2 years ago
Grande !
NikiPSD 2 years ago
5fps? wtf
mikel064 2 years ago
Nikon d3 problems: First of the images I got from the camera were incredible, amazing clarity and the noise was hardly anywhere at 6400 compaired with previous digi's. So the final image was great really impressed.
BUT the focusing? I was shooting with a 70-200 2.8 vr and the new 24-70 2.8 lens' they refused to find focus in low light and were seeking for hours. I set the camera focus on one point ai so it would focus quicker and i could manually adjust.
rustynasty143 2 years ago
nikon d3 12.1 mp and Canon 10 mp, now how come canon's image quality is sharper and better than nikon strange isn't it.
rustynasty143 2 years ago
dumbass..
syafiqzailan 2 years ago
ape yang dumbass??
perimeterwire 2 years ago
memang la bunyi die lain.. 5fps.. lol..
syafiqzailan 2 years ago
10fps Nikon's dream ;0)
it's canon's Past lol ;0p
coolay11 2 years ago
The canon is a crop sensor model, the d3 is full frame, and in the D3's crop mode you get 11 fps
VenonnFang 2 years ago
Don't forget that at 11 FPS, autoexposure and autofocus is disabled between shots during a burst on the nikon.
Orcinus24x5 2 years ago
The spec sheet says the highest speed works with continuous af mode. Also says it works on shutter priority mode.
VenonnFang 2 years ago
d3 still sluggish compare to 1d m3
rustynasty143 2 years ago
I still love the sound of the old motordrive cameras better. click whir click whir click whir click whir
Some camera companies had some very exotic highspeed motordrive cameras from 10 - 14 fps but were huge in physical size
Whatdididoo 2 years ago
BIG LOL!!
you can't compare 5fps vs. 9fps!!
of course they sound different!!!
frigofoto 2 years ago 2
He isn't comparing the fps he is comparing the sound of the shutter.
I personally love the sound of my D3, but i know people who hate it.
shadowblack1987 2 years ago
yee I know,
but what I mean is you should not compare the sound of 5 fps vs. 9 fps
of course they sound different!
to be fair you should compar 1D MkIII and D3 that hav 10fps vs. 9 fps thats much more fair!
frigofoto 2 years ago
He isn't talking about FPS, but the sound of the shutter. You will still get that clickclik of the 1D vs the clickclack of the D3.
But nothing beats the sound of a Hasselblad :D
shadowblack1987 2 years ago
all you fucking bitches touting this or that. fact is, cameras in this range dont matter. it's all about the photographer. if you suck, you suck not matter what camera you have in your hand
archbus 2 years ago 3
I absolutely agree with your comments. The camera is only a tool, it all comes down to the person behind the camera. I think Canon has the potential to deliver great photos as well as sharp resolution.
kenfrancis74 1 year ago
why would you have 2 separate brands? you could have bought the 1D MK3 rather than that D3
Pus you can change interchange their lenses!!! WTH??!!! stupid choice mate!!
joseeeeeph1219 2 years ago
Comment removed
rustynasty143 2 years ago
This video is a load of crap. The canon wasn't shooting at 5fps here.
nickwelsh 2 years ago
what a sad twat!!...he prob lives with his mum and plays with a trainset at home....listen to the sound of a camera..why...the quiter the better ..what if your doing wild life shots...Oooohhh better be qiet dont want to frighten the birds away...steady....click click click click click click!!!!!!!....woahhhhh...jesus they flown away!!!!..bloody noisy camera shit!!!!!...grow up nerdy boy!
quantumforce123 2 years ago
it's biased....
nicolasshang 2 years ago
nikon represent!!!!
theskattalitte 2 years ago
crap!
D3 = Crop
1Ds = Fullframe
The 1D Mark III (wo/ s) = Crop @ 10! FPS
The D3x = Fullframe only gets 5fps :P
Fullframe cameras are for quality, studio work etc. and not for sports like the Crops :P
audhen1 2 years ago
are you a photographer or an audiographer!
wahahahaha!
what a waist of time!
reyesjesmar 2 years ago
c'mon ... you can't compare Canons EOS 1Ds MKIII with the Nikon D3 ...
21mp vs. 12 ...
man ...
icksmodder 2 years ago 2
I second that.
jjfretwe 2 years ago
Comment removed
icksmodder 2 years ago
The Canon 1DS MK III wasnt shooting at 5 FPS here.
mickloy 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
mickloy 2 years ago
Most pontless review ive seen, why not compare it against the non S version which is 10FPS
grimey121uk 2 years ago 10
Don't think I've ever seen you quite so excited before Adam :-)
photoexposed 2 years ago
d3 its over!
jigkrozroads 2 years ago
jajajajaja
es mentiraaaa
canon es mejor...
vmm87 3 years ago
burst speed spped compared?
zaohad1 3 years ago
Yeah great, are ya pictures any good?
Q3ToPBuZz 3 years ago
Wicked! I love that sound too!!
chadsexinton 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"you love it", you're a fag who make photos at gravestones and like it deep in his fat nerd ass :))))0
mortitai 3 years ago
Superior fps on the D3 must be the reason I see all those white lenses at sporting events ;)
61ache 3 years ago
nikon makes white lenses too dummy
jhaer 3 years ago
yeah, nikon was the first to make white lenses........
idiot
ichirootaniguchi 3 years ago
Ich, that wasn't his point. Read it again, idiot.
natyuotube 3 years ago
D3 or 1Ds III? I'll stick to my 400d and only worry about taking pictures rather than my gear.
snevelin 3 years ago 4
true that!
canonsucks 3 years ago
well if you're a professional you have to worry about your gear, taking pictures is the least of your worries
but yeah making that comment proves that you're just an amateur
ichirootaniguchi 3 years ago
Comment removed
canonsucks 3 years ago
The D3X is a disgrace, a retarded D3 sold almost double the price. I guess it's not their fault really though, some complained the D3 "doesn't have enough meeegapeexels" so they had to pander to the retards.
snevelin 3 years ago
well if you think the D3x is a disgrace then you're pretty lame,
the D3x is above all in its class, if you actually fucking know what you're looking at the D3x isn't aimed just to have a higher pixel count, its aimed to have double the quality of the D3, it pulls out 90% the same shots of what a mamiya 645 AFD with a Phase One P45+ back, almost, the 1Ds mk3 can't even pull out half of that, so yeah as many idiots think the D3x is a disgrace, its infact continuing the best model
ichirootaniguchi 3 years ago
also the D3x was designed for studio, so 99% of the time you're working at ISO100. compare a shot from the 1Ds mk3 to the D3x and you'll still pull out even more detail with the D3x, my D3 and D700 still pull out atleast 5x sharper images than a mk3 so yeha
ichirootaniguchi 3 years ago
wow, 5x sharper, eh? yeaaaaa...
RochesterGT 3 years ago
There's not much difference on whether nikon or canon is better,it's just up to the person's liking,i'll choose canon tho:)
Godlike8 3 years ago
moan the canon :)
end off !!!
davidmcg20 3 years ago
I know, that sound gives me a boner
Foreezybeezy1 3 years ago
But the LANCAU CIBAI Nikon D3X, also Lancau Cibai at 5 fps, Ahsmed of NIKON
AkuTerlaluKaya 3 years ago
Yeah the 1DS Mk III is 21 MP, that's why it's only 5 fps. The D3 only has 12 MP so it can do 9 fps because there's less information to transfer. FYI The Canon 1D Mk III shoots 10fps, which beats Nikon, obviously.
For the record, Nikons are mostly for women or men/boys with small hands. Look at the Nikon D300, it's a toy compared to the Canon 1d series.
ghuntington79 3 years ago
D3 9 fps but full frame... Canon 1D mk 3 is not full frame, therefore i give D3 more benefit there. Plus, D3 can do 11fps on fx mode =)
D300 cannot be compared with Canon 1d. I am pretty sure you know nothing about cameras.
Btw both are great cameras. No idea why people argue.
cunanet 3 years ago
D3 9 fps but full frame... Canon 1D mk 3 is not full frame, therefore i give D3 more benefit there. Plus, D3 can do 11fps on fx mode =)
D300 cannot be compared with Canon 1d. I am pretty sure you know nothing about cameras.
Btw both are great cameras. No idea why people argue.
cunanet 3 years ago
Actually the D3 does 11fps in DX mode douchebag, thanks for coming out. And it's a whopping 5fps so that's kinda useless.
Regardless, the Canon 1DS III has superior IQ period. FWIW I own a Canon 1DS Mk II, just f$%^&ing sayin..
ghuntington79 3 years ago
5 MP not fps..ech
ghuntington79 3 years ago
Do you shoot in auto? *snigger*
snevelin 3 years ago
Canon is mutch better!!!CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON CANON
mariuspyonline 3 years ago