as a cushioning technology would make some sense, but on track the spring would barely make contact with the ground if you understand how an athletes foot strike differs from a casual runner for example.
Nike did this exact thing as an in house development project a long time ago.... they realized the spring could not be made strong enough without making the whole shoe very stiff. Which would suck. So they then invented the shox as a progression of the idea. Which do suck for performance. Notice how everyone is going minimal these days?
Better get back to the drawing board... or in today's lingo. back to the wacom.
adidas solo ke el modelo es deportibo!
PancracioCascarudo 4 months ago
ADIDAS OR PUMA?................
platinolacay 7 months ago
as a cushioning technology would make some sense, but on track the spring would barely make contact with the ground if you understand how an athletes foot strike differs from a casual runner for example.
wotdafunk 11 months ago
Nike did this exact thing as an in house development project a long time ago.... they realized the spring could not be made strong enough without making the whole shoe very stiff. Which would suck. So they then invented the shox as a progression of the idea. Which do suck for performance. Notice how everyone is going minimal these days?
Better get back to the drawing board... or in today's lingo. back to the wacom.
Good luck.
clevername333 1 year ago
very nice
they can improve it even further by adding some spring
usamanadeem 2 years ago