Virgil Exner's fins were overdone. Ford and Chevy were starting to tone them down; both had horizontal fins instead of vertical. And they rusted with a vengeance. But MoPar was always in front with engineering, torsion bars and the slant six, alternators, etc.
back when america was america..white guys worked like dogs and built great cars,trucks homes etc..now its all blacks,mexcians indians etc,sucking the money sytem dry and america is going to implode now...real soon,prepare!
I prefer the old-idea of a tiny number of long commercials instead of an insane amount of short ones. I've seen shows from this era, uncut with original ads, and having 24 minutes of show and two 2-minute commercials is way better than the modern system.
How could the kids see the movie at the drive in with the rear view mirror attached to the dash??? Virgil Exner sure designed some cars that had character. Too bad Chrysler had him fired.
I'm a serious car nut, but I think the song and the car were competing against each other. Is THAT how they made car commercials 50 years ago?? Nice commercial nonetheless!
Today, this commercial would have a rap tone, a black person would be the seller of the car, selling to a silly stupid fat nerdy ignorant and confused white man.
these cars had a reacord player under the dash boards. i know cause i went to a classic auto shop and i saw that. this was not in the 61 model. kinda neat tho. eh?
Well, you must be a young whippersnapper. You see that "herse" (as opposed to "hearse") was what we old-timers use to call a "station wagon". It was the predecessor of the SUV and is in fact a 1960 Plymouth station wagon. That's why it's in the commercial.
I detect a probably deliberate attempt to impersonate Pat Boone on the part of the vocalist. Boone was well known as a spokesman for Chevrolet at the time.
Thanks for posting this.... I'm surprised they didn't show a convertible or 2-dr hardtop. I have a convertible Fury, fully restored. Magnificent machine - and it gets 20 mpg if you're careful...
i love this car!this is my dream car! and im only 13. i also agree with madsixtian.very awsome video love the part when the band gets all wild at 0:32
i just finished building a 1960 plymouth suburban wagon. it sat for 20 years. i drove for the first time on friday. its a solid land boat. cant do that with many cars today.
I saw one of these at a car show a few years ago. When you see it in person it is even uglier than in the commercial. The 1959 Buick Invicta is probably worse though. Ugly as sin.
I totally agree with you "lousybarber"....the 1960 plymouth was a total dog....I read that Plymouth got caught off guard ....still having tail fins in 1960. It really has an awkward, ridiculas look
OK, Bison. Tell you what - let's see a collision (even a minor rear-ender) between a 2007 Toyota and that '60 Plymouth. Even without seat belts guess which car I'd rather be in? Hint - Not the Toyota. Sure, we're comparing apples to oranges here, and I remember growing up riding in cars with seat belts in them as options ONLY, but I'd have a better chance surviving an accident today if I were in that 1960 car as opposed to the cars that we have today that are as flimsy as a can of Pepsi.
yes MADSIXTIAN.....a friend of mine was driving his mint 1957 Chrysler, Saratoga and stopped for a red light. A new car "rear ended him" the car that hit him had the entire front end demolished. The 57 chrysler only had a dent in the bumper the size of a quarter. It was like rear ending a freight train.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what a TERRRRRIBLE car, absolutely apauling, ugly big petrol guzzling piece of american shite. not to mention one of the worst cars to drive with the stupid bed spring suspension AND ROLL!
A good number of these cars are still in good running condition. They may have been fuel thirsty, but they were built like tanks and cost a lot less money to maintain and repair. Modern cars get $4000 worth of body damage from a grocery basket ding. Also, you are comparing modern cars to 50 year old technology. Apples and oranges.
1960 was the first year Chrysler offered Unibody construction for its full-sized cars. In this commercial they were pitching the smoothness of the ride that the Unibody cars had. This was probably the smoothest-riding American car offered that year. Including Caddies. :)
Don't you dare dis the Plymouth Musicom67! It is a gorgeous car! You can't get quality like that today. Zimchar, this Fury played a small role in another pretty good Stephen King movie, Riding The Bullet. It was a really nice car. Personally, I think that the most evil looking Plymouth was the 1961 Plymouth. Kinda like the '59 Buick...
This car is rolling sculpture. You can dislike it but if you just dismiss it as ugly you're not the sharpest tailfin in the garage. Real ugly is something like a Pontiac Aztek.
wow,no more shake rattle and roll,(about the unibody) but that was the year for the end of rock n roll(bill hayley etc) and the start of the beatles.how prophetic.
Virgil Exner's fins were overdone. Ford and Chevy were starting to tone them down; both had horizontal fins instead of vertical. And they rusted with a vengeance. But MoPar was always in front with engineering, torsion bars and the slant six, alternators, etc.
gojoe283 3 months ago
Nicely styled cars, save for the 2-door hardtop!
thespeez 5 months ago
back when america was america..white guys worked like dogs and built great cars,trucks homes etc..now its all blacks,mexcians indians etc,sucking the money sytem dry and america is going to implode now...real soon,prepare!
doomedamerica 7 months ago
Lucky to own 2 Suburbans one Fury and one Belvedere both from -60.Highest fins that year !
sharkfin60 11 months ago
man i want that car!! and im only 17 lol
extremehockeyfan 1 year ago
my mom had one of these. - it seemed so big when i was 3 years old.
scotsmuscle 1 year ago
Had one of these when I turned 16. It was the bees knees...
gettuff2 1 year ago
Its my grandpa's car.
packjim56 1 year ago
Plymouth Fury for 1960, the angriest looking mother-fucker on the road.
Phase171 1 year ago
I'm sorry, but I think the 60 Plymouths are about the ugliest cars.
presidentbren 1 year ago
@presidentbren I'm totally agree, those fins fit horrendously on that body style and a 58 is a far morre beautiful car.
tonidmc 1 year ago
Wow a real commercial with substance. The television world must sure miss these days
execdyke91 1 year ago
@execdyke91 That is why I gave up cable.
steffidude 1 year ago
I prefer the old-idea of a tiny number of long commercials instead of an insane amount of short ones. I've seen shows from this era, uncut with original ads, and having 24 minutes of show and two 2-minute commercials is way better than the modern system.
MattTheSaiyan 1 year ago
How could the kids see the movie at the drive in with the rear view mirror attached to the dash??? Virgil Exner sure designed some cars that had character. Too bad Chrysler had him fired.
dancer46722 1 year ago 3
I'm a serious car nut, but I think the song and the car were competing against each other. Is THAT how they made car commercials 50 years ago?? Nice commercial nonetheless!
7fixsfj3 1 year ago
Today, this commercial would have a rap tone, a black person would be the seller of the car, selling to a silly stupid fat nerdy ignorant and confused white man.
FabrizzioCastagnola 1 year ago
Just imagine sitting on your living room couch ,now add a steering wheel. Thats how cars used to be.
1952kid 2 years ago
these cars had a reacord player under the dash boards. i know cause i went to a classic auto shop and i saw that. this was not in the 61 model. kinda neat tho. eh?
102Help 2 years ago
my dad had a1960 plymouth,said he could not wear it out,my aunt sold it finally it had well over 170,000 on it still didn't use any oil
dalekrueger 2 years ago
Solid Cool
impossibledrms 2 years ago
wow what a car just a presitine design. 5 ******
fordroad 2 years ago
looks meaner than christine
ccrraaazzy 2 years ago
neat
emlie01 2 years ago
Can someone please explain the symbolism of the herse in the video. Was it an older model or a different make?
cssmd2000 2 years ago
Well, you must be a young whippersnapper. You see that "herse" (as opposed to "hearse") was what we old-timers use to call a "station wagon". It was the predecessor of the SUV and is in fact a 1960 Plymouth station wagon. That's why it's in the commercial.
clydetwopointoh 2 years ago
Cool, i don;t remember since I. was only 6 months old when they built the car. I do remember our 66 New Yorker.
cssmd2000 2 years ago
I Just bought another 60 Savoy, its on its way from the U.S. to Australia as I write, can't wait.
dfrony 2 years ago
I detect a probably deliberate attempt to impersonate Pat Boone on the part of the vocalist. Boone was well known as a spokesman for Chevrolet at the time.
Cris43130 3 years ago
no s### sherlock
whtulookinat 2 years ago
Jerk
cincyblows 2 years ago
rofl.....loser
whtulookinat 2 years ago
STFU. Your mom and I are trying to sleep.
cincyblows 2 years ago
best part of you ran down your moms leg the other day
whtulookinat 2 years ago
I think you mean YOUR mom. Your is the family tree that lacks branches.
Not only that, you drive a Gremlin.
cincyblows 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this.... I'm surprised they didn't show a convertible or 2-dr hardtop. I have a convertible Fury, fully restored. Magnificent machine - and it gets 20 mpg if you're careful...
berzy56 3 years ago
This makes me want to vote for Kennedy and listen to Dean Martin records!
kirkenbunken 3 years ago
This car is beautiful, love those fins! Chevy can't even compare to the design and power of those old mopars!
Charger426 3 years ago
Hip and solid! It ah was solid, right? Your saying solid? Not salad or stolid, but solid? Right? Good. Ok, solid it is. Now I get it. Solid.
Don't forget ugly. But you would never do that.
Solid.
homerthompsonman 3 years ago
i love this car!this is my dream car! and im only 13. i also agree with madsixtian.very awsome video love the part when the band gets all wild at 0:32
1960PlymouthFury 3 years ago
my dad had a 1960 plymouth and he really liked that car, couldn't wear it out
dalekrueger 3 years ago
i just finished building a 1960 plymouth suburban wagon. it sat for 20 years. i drove for the first time on friday. its a solid land boat. cant do that with many cars today.
1bri13 3 years ago
I saw one of these at a car show a few years ago. When you see it in person it is even uglier than in the commercial. The 1959 Buick Invicta is probably worse though. Ugly as sin.
Lousybarber 3 years ago
I totally agree with you "lousybarber"....the 1960 plymouth was a total dog....I read that Plymouth got caught off guard ....still having tail fins in 1960. It really has an awkward, ridiculas look
inkey2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have a large organ
ballinalan 3 years ago
right...until the steering wheel goes through your chest, or you go through the windshield...or you hit your head on the STEEL dash!
slumpyb 3 years ago
installing seatbelts is about as hard as seat cushes, and then that doesn't happen
ElCastrador 3 years ago
OK, Bison. Tell you what - let's see a collision (even a minor rear-ender) between a 2007 Toyota and that '60 Plymouth. Even without seat belts guess which car I'd rather be in? Hint - Not the Toyota. Sure, we're comparing apples to oranges here, and I remember growing up riding in cars with seat belts in them as options ONLY, but I'd have a better chance surviving an accident today if I were in that 1960 car as opposed to the cars that we have today that are as flimsy as a can of Pepsi.
madsixtian 3 years ago 2
he dont diss pepsi
HemiFreak94 3 years ago
yes MADSIXTIAN.....a friend of mine was driving his mint 1957 Chrysler, Saratoga and stopped for a red light. A new car "rear ended him" the car that hit him had the entire front end demolished. The 57 chrysler only had a dent in the bumper the size of a quarter. It was like rear ending a freight train.
inkey2 3 years ago
makes you realise how BAD modern car adds are!
kfs025 3 years ago 13
how much was a car like this in former times?
anonym10000 3 years ago
3-4k depending on options. Was a lot of money back then.
Ej205scoob 3 years ago
Gorgeous car!! Love the styling, especially the fins! Cars really had style then; and the jingle is very nice!
sexysagi 3 years ago 9
at 32 seconds, I love how the band gets all crazy! SHAG!!!
hep2jive 3 years ago
hahahaha i like my 49 better
hep2jive 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a TERRRRRIBLE car, absolutely apauling, ugly big petrol guzzling piece of american shite. not to mention one of the worst cars to drive with the stupid bed spring suspension AND ROLL!
checkerz18 4 years ago
my dad had one and he said he could not wear it out
dalekrueger 3 years ago 2
Hey limy!, they had torsion bars not springs.
montego13 3 years ago
A good number of these cars are still in good running condition. They may have been fuel thirsty, but they were built like tanks and cost a lot less money to maintain and repair. Modern cars get $4000 worth of body damage from a grocery basket ding. Also, you are comparing modern cars to 50 year old technology. Apples and oranges.
greatbison 3 years ago 3
The unfortunate people who owned a '59, must of had plenty of shake, rattle and roll from they way they are singing this jingle!
cleftronix 4 years ago 3
1960 was the first year Chrysler offered Unibody construction for its full-sized cars. In this commercial they were pitching the smoothness of the ride that the Unibody cars had. This was probably the smoothest-riding American car offered that year. Including Caddies. :)
RobDog65 4 years ago
Don't you dare dis the Plymouth Musicom67! It is a gorgeous car! You can't get quality like that today. Zimchar, this Fury played a small role in another pretty good Stephen King movie, Riding The Bullet. It was a really nice car. Personally, I think that the most evil looking Plymouth was the 1961 Plymouth. Kinda like the '59 Buick...
BuddyHollysEdselGirl 4 years ago
What a Beauty!
myandy99 4 years ago 2
This car is rolling sculpture. You can dislike it but if you just dismiss it as ugly you're not the sharpest tailfin in the garage. Real ugly is something like a Pontiac Aztek.
exquisiteoaf 4 years ago
i wish car commericals these days had these awesome songs =D
zomgxsophie 4 years ago
Why wasn't the 1960 fury model year fury Christine? It looks much more evil and badass, with the right paintjob of course.
zimchar 4 years ago
Not a bad advert, but I prefer the '62 Plymouth (as seen in the movie "My Favorite Martian").
7772399 4 years ago
Aieeeee! Those fins put my eye out!
mobilene 4 years ago
Blame Virgil Exner for the body style. (That is if you hate it.)
enigma413 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God what an UUUGGGLLLYYYYY car!!!!! those fins are nasty.
musicom67 4 years ago
better looking than a delorian
dalekrueger 3 years ago 2
Does that mean all the Plymouths before '60 had shake rattle & roll!
TheFamilyTruckster 4 years ago
wow,no more shake rattle and roll,(about the unibody) but that was the year for the end of rock n roll(bill hayley etc) and the start of the beatles.how prophetic.
pescadoygamba 4 years ago 2
"the answer to all your dreams"
hillbillyradicalrick 4 years ago 2
wow nice car
sneyder69 4 years ago 2
Vintage is power... Respect to the creators of this advert!
Peace
tomshoot 4 years ago 2
I want a copy of this, I own a 4-Dr 1960 Plymouth Savoy.
bencar1976 4 years ago 2
The 1960 looks older than the "57,"58,"59's then the "61 & "62 ??? What happened? They killed it!
Tennesseedolly 4 years ago
Very good vocalists! The female vocalist has a beautiful voice.
AndreSm95 4 years ago
Advertising jingles are not what they used to be.
exquisiteoaf 4 years ago
great commercial, visuals and music
707320i 5 years ago