Enuma Elish - Creation Myth of Ancient Babylon

[br4jj4]

Thanks for uploading these clips. Very interesting stuff.

[heliosium]

Now wait a minute. Why do you call Marduk instead of Enki and Ninhursag? Because you are reading the new version made by semites of the original sumerian tale. Tiamat was an old planet split in two and one piece of it is the Earth (look at the Pacific Ocean). And the Bible was originated from one Nibiru Lord call I am who I am. This Jwhv Lord forbids the semites to worship the other nibiru Lords because he had defeated them in a war. Sitchin, please.

[heterodoxism2]

@heliosium

Now wait a minute. Why do you try reading the video description before making unfounded assumptions?

The people who invented this myth knew nothing of the Pacific Ocean.

Yahweh is a FICTION, and fictions do not actually defeat anything in wars, and certainly not other fictions.

[surpss]

part4. The bible has NEVER BEEN WRONG. Think twice before call God a Schizo dude. He's not imaginary and he is def. my pal. Except he doesnt live in the sky. He lives in our hearts. Do ur research buddy. There is a whole organization tht pumps out the bullshyt in this video. I kno about the reincarnations of Jesus in other religions I can debunk those too.

[heterodoxism2]

@surpss

Not only do you talk unsubstantiated, illogical nonsense, but you suffer from verbosity. Adios.

[surpss]

Part 3. Why believe genesis acount? Again i draw from "The Flood" The dimensions of the Ark in gilgamesh are laughable. Building the ark in tht story would amount to a giant wooden cube in real life. The ark in Genesis however is the complete opposite. Double check wat im saying and look up the dimensions. Naval architects have studied noahs ark found it to be optimal for ocean fairing. On top of tht the bible was 25% prophecy at the time tht it was written. Depite it the bible has NEVR

[surpss]

Part 2. People are quick to point out tht the babylonian and mesopotamian txt were written first. The authors of genesis must have known. WRONG! Talk to anybody whose done a thorough analysis of both works. There is no literary dependence. In fact if you look at the flood accounts and assert literary dependence in the hebrew genesis the details and content from both are detramental against the hebrew version. Thts stupid. The fact the flood account in genesis is original. Thts my first point.

[brandonkeaton]

The contrasts between the Enuma Elish & Holy Bible are vastly contrasting. The Enuma Elish tells a story of multiple gods who are NOT immortal, rather fight & kill each other. The story tells that the god who "beget" all was slain dead.

The Holy Bible's content was written through generations and generations by prophets that were risen up by God Himself. Their contributions to the Holy canon were not voluntary, rather commanded. The Bible depicts very consistent traits of a true & living God.

[heterodoxism2]

@brandonkeaton

Wrong. The Bible was written by generations and generations of prophets who could not agree with one another. Unless your imaginary SkyPal is schizophrenic, their writings were as fictional---and profane---as those of Jane Austen, but considerably less relevant to humanity.

I don't put up these videos as a platform for unsubstantiated and illogical comments by believers in fairy tales.

[surpss]

@heterodoxism2 These tablets or whatevr actually give creed to the old testament. Take the flood in the Epic of Gilgamesh for example. The atheists came in their pants when they found this one. Noah is but one of 500 worldwide flood myths. 95% of the flood legends it was worldwide in 88 percent certain few were chosen 67 percent survival was by means of a boat and etc. Conclusion:a bigass flood took place.The question is which story is most dependable why would genesis the best to look at.

[src438]

Very interesting, I never hared that before, I like it.

[23Calypso]

Superb explanation. Thank you.