Added: 1 year ago
From: Thunderf00t
Views: 89,377
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (984)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • thanks for the great work =)

  • They're only visible from August to April. I can see Venus now.

  • good work here

  • i just witnesses a lunar eclipse last week...i took pictures, very cool....

  • "The software used to make this video is free and its called Celestia."]

    Am I the only one thinking of My Little Pony FiM now?

  • @Marshmallowtjes /)*(\

    Bro-hoof

  • it seems like some people still believes that the earth is the center of the universe, and its flat...

  • please look at this vid and tell the guy what you think. my best guess is that its mars because im sure mars reacts that way. /watch?v=2CpOdXPtRZI

  • I remember when I got my first telescope when I was a kid and I saw Venus.

    I was so amazed..........I could even see the craters on the moon!

  • damn now I gotta buy a telescope

  • Great video, would love to see some more astronomy vids from you in the future! :)

  • God is exciting!

  • Well today, in Perth, Australia at 6am in the morning 3 planets were available clear and they were soo big.

  • You didn't mention Uranus! Besides the funny joke, it can be visible to the naked eye under some conditions.

  • I guess its Jupiter.....

  • Does anyone know the planets that have been visible all september-november cause every night i swear i see a planet by the moon .

  • I would like to know more about the education and background of Thunderf00t, I am a big fan of his work, primarily the "Why do people laugh at creationist".

  • 10x for the celestia software

  • Damn it, can't believe I missed this.

    Love how you showed the small telescope and then panned over to the big one right behind it!

  • lol what do people dislike for

    just random or boredom

    you can dislike but you cant deny that there is other planets

    if you can see them?

  • Damn it I missed it. Are there any other cool things like this coming up?

  • @TheAtheistBiker

    Jupiter is a bit past it's opposition, so you can still see that.

    And Venus is still in the western sky at sunset, AFAIK.

    I say take advantage next time the moon passes Jupiter, watch for it. Right now, it's on the wane, so it'll be a couple of weeks before it passes again.

  • how many planets can u see using a normal home telescope?? please reply. can u just see venus mars n saturn?

  • @merezfinestz08 Potentially a home scope can see more, the problem is that fainer planets get drowned out by brighter objects. a good home scope (anything from 6" and up), will show plenty of sights.

  • Oh Bugger I missed them. could you see them in the southern hemisphere?

  • Love your graphics. Great illustrations.

  • I noticed the the planets without even realizing it. I thought they were extremely bright for the evening sky and so I used my Google Sky app on my Android and was amazed to be looking at the three planets almost lined up perfectly. It was so beautiful and awe inspiring. I viewed the planets from my window in Long Beach, CA with the naked eye! Also Jupiter has been super bright these past few days. I need that telescope!! Thanks for the video!!!

  • i have a question. can you see with the celestron firstscope the nebulas or some galaxies like say in the celestron web page?

  • Funny thing is that Christians and generally people who have no idea about space and science and await the 2012 end of the world and stuff, believe that these bright visible objects in the sky are the nibiru planet or other conspiracy bullshit.

  • @Heavyassalter dont need nibiru, mars alone can cause destruction. i hear its coming real close, it looked huge last two days, and nasa announced mars is out of orbit and can cause gravitational pull soon. give it two years to get closer 2012.

  • I actually don't get how people thumb up joggylol's comments over and over again while AntiVenomFangX (what a name) lets us all understand why his comments are quit irrevelant. The last 3 comments were the same, only with other words. I think we should thumb up AntiFang blablabla's comments because he isn't afraid say what he really thinks.

  • @maartenh94 Agreed. joggylol clearly misunderstood what AVFX was saying. However, I can see why cursing can be counter-productive at times, since people like joggylol get flustered and focus on your insults rather than your message. Also, it is somewhat rude to call someone stupid simply because they don't understand and don't take the time to understand your points. Everyone does stupid things, not just stupid people.

  • I bought that $35 telescope when this video first got posted, and it's been great. My two teenagers love crater hunting on the moon, and even my 2 year old is hooked. "Moon" is now part of his vocabulary, and he regularly ask for to go out and look at it. He even pulled the telescope out of the closet once. I can't wait to see your video about better telescopes so I can get one. I'm hoping you'll have a suggestions for something in the $400-500 range that is easier to track objects with...

  • @weeeezzll My first scope was on an equitorial (EQ) mount, which simply means it arcs in such a way that you can track things easier and can even get them with a little motor on the side to do it automatically (like my Skywatcher 130M). However....as fancy as that sounds, I'm starting to wish I'd just gone for a dobsonian, like the one featured in this video. They can't track things automatically (unless you go for the serious computerised ones, usually $1k+), but you'll get more bang for buck.

  • @weeeezzll As for the telescope itself, I certainly don't know enough to be giving specific advice, but the general rule of thumb, is aperture, aperture and more aperture. The bigger the aperture, the more light gets in to the scope and the more you can see. I have a 130mm (5") reflector which will, with the suplied 10mm eyepiece and 2x barlow, allow me to easily see several cloud bands round jupiter and it's 4 galiean moons, but for $500, you'll easily find an 8" dosonian.

  • @weeeezzll I bought this telescope too, and I've been having trouble with it. Any tips? It's really difficult for me to locate any objects, and once I do I don't see any detail on Jupiter (haven't tried yet to see the rings of Saturn).

  • @airandfingers You are not likely see Saturn's rings unless it is an exceptionally clear night and you live in an area with very little city light.  I've been trying to view Venus every since I bought it last month. I've only had one night were it was clear enough for Venus to actually look like a ball shaped object. Most of the time it looks kind of "twinkly" for the lack of a better term...

  • @weeeezzll Hmm, what are telescopes this weak meant to be used on, if not Saturn and other planets? I could see good detail on the moon.. Maybe I should try aiming it at neighbors' windows? (Just kidding. :) )

  • @weeeezzll Dobsonian, is the cheapest and easiest to use and set up, an 8" would suit you.

  • very nice!

  • Who the hell are the 24 morons who disliked this video?! You can't dislike that there are other neighboring planets in our solar system. What exactly don't you like you planetary fascists!

  • @airbornlegend I am one of the "morons" who disliked this. Mainly because it states the basic facts of the solar system. The same reason i would have thumbed it down if it stated the alphabets of the english language. But i doubt you would do the same

    P.S. It's really sad that there exists drones like you in Thunderf00t's subscriber base, who votes videos not based on merit but the messenger

  • @airbornlegend werd without nieghboring planets particularly jupiter to act is a shield we would be at a great deal higher risk of a celestial object impacting us.

  • @airbornlegend

    lol, geocentrists man.

  • @airbornlegend They must not like Reflecting Telescopes. I admit myself, before I learned more about astronomy, I didn't believe in the power of Reflecting Telescopes. I only believed in Refracting ones.

  • i saw venus and mars! With my bare naked eyes! balling

  • saturn was beautiful the other night

  • Mars needs to knock Venus and Saturn out of the sky and assume its rightful place as King of the Planets.

  • How do you add those labels to the planets and the Moon in Celestia?

  • you can also see juipiter i see it every night at 1:34

  • yeh

  • Cheers Thunderf00t, I seen all of these through a telescope last night and then the moons of Jupiter hours later in the north sky, Id never seen any of these before..

  • For those living in Central Illinois tonight, July 19, and tomorrow, July 20, viewing these planets won't be possible due to violent thunderstorms. I think this sucks. But after that, you should be able to view all of this as long as you're not living too close to any city. It's a shame to say that some cities have so many bright lights that it's nearly impossible to see celestial objects.

  • Yeah, I saw all those planets months ago. Neptune, Uranus, and Jupiter come up in that order in the sky around 2 in the morning where I live and I'll whip out my telescope once they come out a little earlier.

  • @Squipplekillzbitches you must be kidding. a delusional. what do you job? astronaut? you just see a sky and star but it's not neptune and uranus.. it too far a away from earth to see that planet with telescope. lmao!

  • @Marvelius300

    You find them by knowing their positions near constellations and you find them. You just search around with your telescope or use the viewfinder and you see them.

    Btw are you high?

  • Thank you Thunderf00t for pointing me at this, I would have missed it.

  • Re: Counterclockwise direction

    It's only counterclockwise if viewed from the north. Viewed from the south it's Clockwise.

  • @neoaeonian

    Obviously... but who cares for the southerners and their twisted world view?

  • I went out and saw them earlier.. And WOW..

    Mars and Saturn were a little hard to see, though.. Wish I had a telescope..

    Seeing a planet 100x the size of Earth as such a little speck makes me feel small..

  • @JesterAzazel :-)

  • I was out at duck tonight and i was surprised at just how bright Venus was.

  • I'm not a science nerd but this is prety cool. Dam it I've always wanted a telescope!

  • You can be well educated, but still believe bullshit if you want. There's no trace of any god in nature, so, without believers he's nothing at all. Just a concept that need people like you. Oh, and personal experience are not a proof. There's a lot of people who believe a lot of crazy shit at mental hospitals. It's called delusion, when you believe something unreal. Is there any proof of God existence in our reality independent of your interpretation? You know God because culture, that's all.

  • awesome, you used celestia. have been using the program for the occasional space exploration

  • Comment removed

  • cool a couple of months ago i saw the face of the moon and venus through a telescope for the first time (im 34 yrs old) and was able to match them to a map of the moon and such. it was realy cool. i just have the cheap $20 scope from meade sold at wallmart.

  • @FixedByDoc That's something everyone should have experienced. Many start, when they are kids, but one is never too old for that.

  • @starguts He does something like this every few months or so, but I agree it'd be cool to see more of it.

  • @starguts

    But I like the 'tackle the irrational' Thunderf00t!

  • I couldn't see any of these, there's too many damn thunderclouds everywhere

  • Thank you, that was very interesting. have you or are you going to do anymore for us to see.

    Gail x

  • sooo cloudy round here (UK) atm ¬_¬'. Been watching venus for a while but there's very little chance of seeing anying else =(

  • What program is it he's using to observe the planets in relation to the moon and earth?

  • @BusinessIDBAI celestia its a free program he tels you how to get it.

  • @pinzgauernorcal

    LoL, wow, I'm retarded. Thank you very much!

  • So will venus be closest to the earth on oct 28th?

  • Science truly is beautiful. I think I need to buy myself one of those telescopes.

  • @elliotbonsall I know, that's what I said.

  • @elliotbonsall Don't you mean rotate?

  • Thanks Tf00t, I have been looking at Venus since most nights on the drive home from work (about 1am) and it's good to actually get a bit of info about what I am seeing. I don't normally comment on Ytube videos, but with all the inane religious banter that your videos inevitably get, I thought you might appreciate knowing that people actually enjoy your 'religion free' science videos as well.

  • I live in Detroit and I can even see these with my naked eyes. I can't see very many stars at all because of light and air pollution so that should tell you how bright they are. It's pretty amazing how you can just look up and see other planets at vast distances from our own. I pointed them out to a friend who said "oh those stars" and I let her know that those are indeed planets. Most people don't even ever look up and appreciate the massive scale of space.

  • @bullfrog11758 I was a Christian and there is nothing supernatural. You may feel some goosebumps that you think is God. You may not feel alone cause you believe your not alone. Don't get me wrong, I dont say religion is ALL bad, but is for weak minded people that need a reason to be a good human being.

  • @bullfrog11758 It may have some good but also bad things, which makes it human. Why would an almighty God care of insignificant humans that are like ants. Paradise? Have you ever think that eternal life is a way to brainwash people because of their fear of death? Love from God? All you feel in religion is in your head...

  • @bullfrog11758NAME ONE SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY THE BIBLE HAS THAT HUMANS HAVE USED TO THE BETTER DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORLD. Ohhh yeah, you wont find one..... THE BIBLE ISNT A SCIENTIFIC book. Its more of a fictional book that was written by humans. This comes from someone who actually knows from the Bilble.

  • Science just observes and take notes about nature. We can observe these natural laws everywhere, measure them and explain them just from what we can observe; but you can't do the same thing with imaginary beings. To believe in God all you need is faith, the same as with any of the infinite set of imaginary beings, if you like so, you can believe in all of them too. We need proof of existence, not of nonexistence (this is imposible) to believe or disbelieve something. Sorry about my poor english.

  • Thank you for this video... just saw them (from Bulgaria) :)

  • @bullfrog11758 You can not "Believe" ignorance. And faith is ignorance good sir, it is assuming with no evidence because of how you feel. Which is religion.

    "Outrageous claims need extraordinary evidence."

  • @joshrocks11 my evidence is a living relationship with Jesus Christ

  • @AntiVenomFangX faith is not remotely close to ignorance, and your definition is absurd, faith is different from worshipping a deity as well, it is a confident belief of a person, idea, or thing, so pretty much thunderf00t is your faith if you like him so much or atheist ideology, same shit, and no I am not a religious person by the way.

  • @joggylol

    im sorry i should of made it more clear for someone who doesnt understand context such as yourself.

    faith in the existence of a magical thing is ignorance + uneducated assurance.

    please accept my apology

  • @AntiVenomFangX I am sure you totally didn't read half my comment, faith is a a confident belief of a person, idea, or thing

  • @joggylol

    trust me, i believe you when you say you are sure i didnt read half of it

    ....so a belief in a thing.... like a god right? which if this gods truth book is mutually exclusive with biological evolution..... would..... make it...... IGNORANCE

    now your being just as ignorant as someone who has a confident belief in a thing like the Christians version of god!!!! haha

  • @AntiVenomFangX a belief can be anything, it can also mean a belief in science, belief in god, belief in anything, it doesn't matter it just doesn't point directly to "religion", again you have yet to read my comment and all you say is "IGNORANCE" yet you are ignorant to the fact I am telling you what the definition of "faith" is

  • @joggylol

    now im convinced you are an idiot.

    i told you that faith is ignorance.... this was in the context of religions...

    you then explained that faith can be a confident beliefe in a person place or thing.

    then i explained if this thing is a god(the context) that contradicts biological evolution it is in fact ignorant....

    i have faith that you are not going to give up on this... because in your reality im telling you that faith is something else than your definition...which is ignorant.

  • @AntiVenomFangX Yes, throwing insults only discredits you, I was merely stating the definition of faith, it is a strong belief in a person, idea, and thing, plain and simple, that's it, that's the whole kitten-caboose!

  • @joggylol

    how does it discredit me? i honestly feel as if you are an idiot, because you knew what context it was said in..... now your changing your stupid shit by claiming to only being a passer by giving a nice tidbit of fact. come on, do you really think i need to say "sir i belive that you might not be intelligent" instead of "now im convinced you are an idiot"?

  • @AntiVenomFangX I would rather talk this out intellectually instead of throwing curse words like "stupid shit", like I said before, faith's definition is not ignorance, that is your own opinion, which I have no problem with but to correct it, since the real definition means, a strong belief of a person, idea, and thing, that simple, even a 5th grader could figure that out

  • @joggylol

    thats just the thing. there is no use in talking this out like an adult with you. you will keep posting your fact that contradicts nothing. ill still show you that your definition proves my point. and then somehow in your head youll see it as me saying your fact is not factual

    you even wrote it again "faith's definition is not ignorance, that is your own opinion"

    your definition helps my point not yours. because confident belief in christ(person,thing) is ignorant by definition!!!

  • @AntiVenomFangX yet a confident belief in science and atheism is the same thing, get over it

  • @joggylol

    nobody is arguing against that you fucking retard. this is why i send insults your way. your blatant stupidity is evident.... you know what it isnt an insult at all. it is an observation. your fucking insane.

    you might as well just keep telling me that the sky is blue, over and over and over. and then when i say you are an idiot you can say "insults only discredit you" hahahahaha are we done here? or do you still not get it?

  • @AntiVenomFangX yet again "fucking retard", "blatant stupidity" and crude curse words will get you no where, I clearly stated the definition "faith", that's it, I told you before and I will tell you again, it is a strong belief in a person, idea or thing, plain and simple

  • @joggylol

    hahahha nobody is arguing against your definition(this is why i call you stupid) never was. your definition proves my point. like i said it is the equivelant of you telling me over and over that the sky is blue even though im not arguing against it.

    this is so depressing. you think this whole time i have been saying your wrong.... which is stupidity. oops i did it again. looks like you win all because your provided evidence that you are stupid and i pointed it out. how easy for you!

  • @joggylol - Hi, Joggylol. It's actually "kit & kaboodle." :- )

  • @GlorifiedTruth ahh yes

  • good job idiot thunderfoot. god is still real stupid!!!

  • @bullfrog11758 At least we see, hear, test and prove what we "believe"

    Your beliefs? myths and legends with no basis in reality whats so ever. Like dragons, fairies and leprechauns

  • It's a shame we're getting such a collosal amount of rain and cloud at the moment here in Wales. I still get chills from remembering the first time I saw Saturns rings in my first telescope :)

  • Very good video!

  • Bullfrog has the ignorance and intellect of a 2nd grader. He seems to think saying "No you're wrong!" is a damning argument proving his baseless side. Saying it doesn't make it so. Back it up with evidence or keep it to yourself. Calling others ignorant without something to back it up is IGNORANT!!!

  • @bullfrog11758 See bullfrog you're worthless, as soon as i propose a question to you for once, i.e. How about you prove your side? Instead of always telling science to prove this and prove that God Doesnt exist! Prove that he does exist?? You just ignored me. You're a fucking stubborn moron. You cant just ignore the questions that ruin everything you're trying to argue. Open your eyes PLEASE!

  • @TruthfulChristian2 I just tried to reply to your comment on your channel. when I went to post it, it said ( your channel said) COMMENT PENDING APPROVAL. The truth hurts doesnt it. BAAAK BUK BUK BUK BUK (chicken noise)

  • Can some one compare the first scope with the celestron 20x80 ? some one?

  • @TruthfulChristian/ Im afraid, my friend, the onus is on you to provide proof and/or evidence that natural laws did have a creator! Science is mostly governed by material findings. i.e solids, liquids, gases. Anyway, I thought this video was about observing and tracking planets!

  • @mikeet00n I know, right? What the hell does planets being visible have to do with magic assholes in the clouds? People are retarded.

  • Celestia and Sellarium. Great! I love them.

  • What proof and/or evidence do you have that all of this came together by natural laws, and that these natural laws did not have a creator?

  • @TruthfulChristian2 Didnt you get pwned enough already on Blogtv?

  • @TruthfulChristian2 What proof do you have they're not made by more than one designer?

  • @TruthfulChristian2

    The burden of proof lies with the possitive statment, stop using that old line from shockofgod, its makes you look stupid.

  • @TruthfulChristian2 TC2 you must first give proof/evidence that all of this DID NOT come about by natural laws and a creator of these laws is needed since the one claiming a positive statement must give evidence that backs up their claim.

    Also I am disappointed that you blocked me for asking, during TS's BlogTV, if you still claimed that Neanderthals EVER existed in Africa, and even if they did would African have been too hot for them during the ICE AGE.

    My video pwning you on this up soon.

  • @TruthfulChristian2

    Even the most rudimentary physics tell us this. Which, it seems, is too hard for your mind to grasp.

  • @TruthfulChristian2

    Also, it's rather funny that you block those who bring rather compelling arguments against your dear magical sky daddy.

    Ah. This is what happens to every creationist who can't handle the truth. As soon as you're forced to the corner, you keep on shouting that god moves in mysterious ways and completely ignore and censor anyone.

  • its impossible to see shit the lights in the city is always on

  • @errerer94 for sure. cant even see the moon

  • Thank you!

  • TF, thank you for these videos. I've been a sky watcher since I was a kid and i still have the telescope my grandfather gave me when I was 9.

  • @LesterMartin Me too

  • It would be nice to see the sky but I live in England!

  • @noamees

    You know that YouTube is going to the dogs when you post a positive comment about looking forward to watching the tutorial on buying a telescope and some imbecile flags it as spam.

    .

    I marked it "not spam" and gave it a thumbs up as well!

  • @AlanCFA

    Thanks, dude. Also, it happens that I had to do the same thing to you. Some imbecile marked your reply to Meninx87 as spam..

    How hard is it to understand the definition of "spam"?

  • @bullfrog11758 - congratulations, you've just won troll of the day award.

  • @bullfrog11758 "do archeaological research on the bible." It's been done - when Joshua got to Jericho, it had been abandoned for 150 years - so much for his horn tooting bringing the walls down. . "read its 100% accurate record of true prophecy". Like Nebuchadnezzar conquering Tyre when it was conquered by Alexander the Great? . "the calendar goes by his birthdate" So what? . " the most widespread book ever is the bible" Actually, it's the Thoughts of Chairman Mao that's the most widespread.
  • @bullfrog11758 Stop with the assumptions. I did believe in god at one point and at my own will I came to the conclusion god didn't exist. You on the other hand was probably raised in your faith and taught not to question anything. That is what you do, you assert non-sense and when any bit of reason comes into play you ignore it and claim "No, no, no, that is more proof god exist, because it is simply there."

    Shut the fuck up you, moron.

  • i had seen mars before but i wasnt sure if it was. it was pure accident too, i looked up and pointed at a random start and it turned out to be a planet. yesterday, thanks to you, i was able to see THREE planets. mars is my favorite planet, although as os yesterday saturn is the one i think is the most beautiful.

  • @bullfrog11758 I know the flying spaghetti monster made everything because he wrote it in this book. I also know the book is true because he said it was and we do know he is real because the book said so.

    Circular logic!

  • @bullfrog11758 You have to be a troll, no one man can be this stupid. The bible does say the earth is flat and it does say it sits on pillars.

    Nevertheless, reaffirm? How does this reaffirm your belief. You are drawing me in! Ah!

    God is not real and you have to prove him; not your proof like "Oh hey guys, we know god did it because the proof is we are here." Us being here is not proof.

    Troll.

    9/10

  • Have you tried using Stellarium?

  • @bullfrog11758

    Yes the bible never mentions trinity but it also never mentions rapture. THe bible is long enough and vague enough that passages can be found to support ANY postion. Pro trinity and against a trinity.

    Now if you take the road that the holy spirit isn't god or perhaps not even A god, do you do the same with that jesus character? was jesus god, A god or neither?

  • @bullfrog11758 go out now and spend the next year proving that the universe isnt still expanding, and that it wasn't made billions and billions of years ago in an unexplainable occurance. PROVE that it was God and not the more likely proposals of mankinds smartest people. (BIBLE IS NOT PROOF AS IT IS A BOOK WRITTEN BY PEOPLE THAT NOBODY IN WRITTEN HUMAN HISTORY HAS EVER MET. Please get that in your brain. bible is secondry evidence and PROOVES nothing. Just a cosy story)

  • @bullfrog11758 how about for once, instead of religious people like you saying to normal people, "go and disprove this or prove that!" How about YOU disprove the science.. You can't? Thought not. the point is people take the most reliable theory as truth because thats human nature. I am foul mouthed because nothing gets through your damn thick skulls. You are all the same, literally exactly the same, the most stubborn, arrogant, ignorant people ive ever met. Prove science wrong. Primary evidence

  • dam clouds!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @bullfrog11758

    I am not defending a trinity or any gods, simply stating that the holy spirit is mentioned as some sort of quazi god several times throughout the bible, it's the holy spirit that knocks up mary, not god itself. OR was it god? Who knows? That's your meaningless mumbo jumbo, not mine. It's like arguing whether or not batman could kick superman's ass or if thor will eventlually lose to loki.

  • @bullfrog11758 ... never ever happened again! Yes i will definately believe the bibles stories that suprisingly have never actually happened in the prime of mankind, the obviously sensible time for God to show his face and prove his existence.. But no why would you do that! It makes much more sense for God to prove himself to human kind when there is no possible way the humans could record it as hard proof like we could now-a-days. Seems like your God is a fucking idiot. Maybe that reflects you!

  • @bullfrog11758 you just interpret the words, move them around a little with possible tranlations too and make it into a logical easy solution. Well you know what? Nothing is easy in life, nothing. Yet God can make a universe that is still expanding into the unknown in a few days. Oh wow that sounds like something i would believe if i was 4! And a man built a big boat and held 2 of all of the approximate 2 Billion species. Wow that sounds so logical!! Especially as there is no proof and it......

  • Planets? I thought Amerikans were only interested in Stars ^^

  • @bullfrog11758 Hmm i dont think so? See the thing you religious crazies do is create so much shit in your heads! Like thunderf00t actually says in one of his videos about nephlimfree God is a creation in his head and God is just as illogical and stupid as he is. you INTERPRET the bible in the way that fits the scientific facts. If humanity mistakenly discovered that the sun revolved around the earth, you would sway the bibles words to fit that. Nowhere does the bible give a hard fact EXACTLY

  • @bullfrog11758

    Which really brings up a telling point. Why WOULD an all powerful being, use such an untrustworthy format, like the one the bible came from, to spread IT's message? Like I said, the biggest contradictions found in the bible are the gods and magic, if you can't get past that, picking passages apart is mental masturbation.

  • @bullfrog11758

    Oh what it REALLY say's. You know I kind of think an all powerful being could have been a bit more clear....

  • @bullfrog11758

    So the passage saying god created animals so adam wouldn't be alone is a contradiction, eh?

    As for the 3 god thingy, sure there's plenty mentionings of this holy spirit fellow, a god fellow and a jesus fellow. Are you saying anyone of them ISN'T a god?

  • @bullfrog11758

    You can hardly call the bible contradiction free if you can't get past this one found in the first two passages.

  • @bullfrog11758

    Right, with Christianity you get 3 gods for the price of one, but you still haven't answered which were created first according to the bible, animals or humans.

  • @bullfrog11758

    That's swell, but you didn't answer the question. According to the bible, did god create animals before or after humans?

  • @bullfrog11758

    Read it for yourself and find out yourself. What research do you need to fix this obvious contradiction. Also please note where god say's "let US make man in OUR image..."

  • @bullfrog11758

    BEFORE Gen 2:18-19 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

  • @bullfrog11758

    AFTER Gen. 1:25-27 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let us make man in our image.... So God created man in his own image.

  • @bullfrog11758 The contradictions are the least of my concerns about getting any closer to that text.

  • @bullfrog11758

    If you have heard them all, tell me, according to the bible, were animals created BEFORE or AFTER humans?

  • @bullfrog11758

    Have you actually read the bible. Do you realize there are TWO creation accounts? The order of creation is different between the two-they can't both be right. So right from the beginning paragraphs you can't help but notice contradiction in the bible.

  • @bullfrog11758 Zero contradiction? Are you serious? I think you need to look at the videos of ProfMTH or NonStampCollector.

  • @bullfrog11758 also you say our theories are just supposition and conjecture... you do realise religion is also an idea... hence being hundreds of religion, much like there are many varients on scientific explainations. You are THE biggest hypocrite ever. Please reply to this comment with more of your 0% prooved hypocritical bullshit because no matter what you say, science will have a better and more reasonable answer! Always! how can you be so arrogant as to ignore this... It makes no sense.

  • @bullfrog11758 yes im irritated because i cant believe theres so many people like you still on this planet. For the 3rd time you make the biggest hypocritical statement ever along with personal insults because you have the least proof of all. Religion is the only thing i can think of that has 0% primary proof. Do you know why? Because there's never been anything prooving it since man began to record things. You may say "the bible is proof" Get of your high fucking horse and realise its secondary