[PR] August 2010, 100-year-compulsory annexation , Korea-Japan citizens' rally.

[yootubesurfer101]

@pplarzza 야 이런 미친새끼야

speak for yourself, you ultra nationalist idiot. it's not like we're picking fights with an innocent nation here.. 당신이 뭘믿고 이렇게 당당한건데?? 너나 똥처먹고 뒈져. Crazy mofo..

[pplarzza]

また朝鮮人がこんなものねつ造して

クソ食って死ね、朝鮮人

Eat shit and die, crazy koreans!

[tictactogo1]

What a distorted propaganda clip this is.

1) Annexation and Colonialization is not the same. Unlike other colonialization that took place mostly for unilateral exploitation, Japan made a huge investment to develop and modernize Korea from their devastated poverty and debts.

2) Japan went through legal process to execute annexation of Korea.

3) Korean gov agreed that Japan owe nothing to Korea on the basic peace treaty on 1965.

Koreans need to face the truth and stop being such ignorants.

[2009xellos]

@tictactogo1 1) Comparing the Economic development rates of the periods 1910~1945 and 1945~1980. that of 1910 was only 3.5%, whereas the latter was 10~11%. And in1945, the agricultural population was over 80%. What was done during 35 years? The benefits given to Korea during annexation are SO overrated.

[tictactogo1]

@2009xellos 1) If you wanna compare the economic growth rate influenced by annexation, why don't you make a comparison before and after the annoxation? It's completely pointless to compare the rate right in the middle of wars and after those wars. If you want to know the contribution JP had made for Korea, check my Channel Description of [What's not taught in Korean Textbook regarding "Japan--Korea Annexation"]. It shows the statistical facts, NOT overrated evaluation.

[2009xellos]

@tictactogo1 2) Japan, backed up by their military, pretended they were acting at Korea's will.

3) Material debt can be repaid, human atrocities can't be. They must be remembered.

Japanese need to stop masturbating

[tictactogo1]

@2009xellos 2) Korean always claim "Korea signed the treaty unwillingly 'cause they were threatened by force" as a given premise without any validations whatsoever, and completely igonore the fact that the annexation was also promoted by Koreans (i.e. Iljinhoe). The question here is "there was no illegitimacy of annexation". If you are keep insisting on "threats", the illegitimacy was first introduced in 1969 "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 51", NOT effective for 1910 treaty.

[tictactogo1]

@2009xellos 3) So what you saying is JP is obligated to burden individual compensations forever and ever and ever, desipite that both nations agreed in settlement? What atrocities during the annexation are you talking about? Most of all, Korea always act like they were victims of war crime but how can they be victims and aggressors at the same time during WW2?

Again, Koreans really need to stop delude themselves and stop spreading lies around the world. It only brings shame upon yourself.

[TheFunknoid]

We Koreans should remember a trueful history.