2:24 why is a dude in the upper left carrying what looks like a musket from the ottoman empire, I know soldiers would use old weapons, but a antique musket is hard to believe
@Herbymac0811 notice they were aiming at personnel not a bunker or tank. tanks have a few more ammo types than just AP. some HE's have a fuse system it would be like a grenade with a percussion rod. yeya
омг я посмотрел этот фильм! я только сейчас понял стенное значение слова бред=) фильм великолепный советую всем вы сможете проникнуться тем чувством страха которое испытывала съемочная группа к СССР.... в самом начале фильма показывают как советские танкисты с помощью газа огнеметов ядов и авиации уничтожают афганскую деревушку домов в 10 ..... спс поржал...
@triumph1974 There suppose to be 4 crew members of that tank (Driver, Gunner, Loader, Commander). The 5th person in the movie is an Afgan officer that is a Observer. Maybe in training to command a tank for the Afgan military!
All that for a missfire ? I think not ! The breachblock closed and locked so the round seated correctly. The tank wouldn't have blown up, the could have gone off by it's self and the gun would funtion normaly, ejecting the spent caseing. Or they could just have unlaoded it and thrown the shell out. Hollywood realy needs to start getting shit right ....
@ppitm it was actually a crew of 15 man. but the most of them died by attacking a village. a mujahideen blow up their tanks. and there was a lot russians inside it.
This happened to my Dad in WW II while in the Philippine Islands, except with a 155mm howitzer. They pulled the lanyard and....nothing. He said that they all ran like mad, but it never did blow up.
When I first time seen this movie, it was one of the first about war in afghanistan, it was in french and had some scenes cut off (good work of our regiment's comissar lol), we didn't understand anything what they are talking about, but think that tank commander and crew are heroes and fighting to the last man. How suck it was when I found it with russian subtitles and understood that they are just traitors!
One of the cool things about this film is that, since we're supposed to identify with the Soviet tankers, they speak unaccented English (like we're understanding Russian), but the Mujahadin all speak Pashtun(?) and there are no subtitles when the Soviet crewman is near them.
@wewewahid I like your attitude. The only reason the dumb shits won anyway is because the US helped them (which I'm sure you already knew). I'm actually looking for some good books on this war, if you know any offhand it would be greatly appreciated.
@go0fy11137 fuck the u.s. i did know that already but they only helped with weapons thats it im not taking sides on the war because it was dumb u.s. just had to instogate and turn rebels against communism because afghanistan was an allied comunist country
The Americans have done this film, this is an American propaganda against Russia. These are lies. I know many men who were in Afghanistan, they have never killed never people. American lies
thats a t-62 mate, a t-55 has got the fume extractor right at the end of the barrel, and it hasnt got the v-shaped fording plate at the front like the t-72s have.
i think its cool to watch, a crew hopping out of the tank and legging it. You see this giant metal beast causing destruction but then simple men come running out
what makes you think the UK would back a bunch of slack jawed Yanks over culturaly superior Russians. Ya know a country that have given the world opera's, poetry and great novels ya know a bit more than an hot dog and pepsi.
russia,china, north korea and serbs are a threat to the world .russia are making these nukes and sending them to countries wich will uuse them against other countries .
the uk is americas #1 ally if russia goes to war with america america would have: uk, australia, south afrika, afghanistan, canada, france, germany, italy, greece, spain probably on its side oh yea and india and pakistan
Russia would only have:china north korea and fags like that
No idea actually, I'm sure someone can answer more precisely.
I would have thought the percentage of misfires would have fallen by now, better manufacturing processes and materials but not my area of expertise. I only stuck this up after a conversation elsewhere! :D
2:24 why is a dude in the upper left carrying what looks like a musket from the ottoman empire, I know soldiers would use old weapons, but a antique musket is hard to believe
iknowmy3table 1 month ago
great movie no phony accents
MrGrorg 1 month ago
@Herbymac0811 notice they were aiming at personnel not a bunker or tank. tanks have a few more ammo types than just AP. some HE's have a fuse system it would be like a grenade with a percussion rod. yeya
flossy26 1 month ago
Soviets and an Afghan Communist with American accents, that is funny.
MaoistLeninistMarx 2 months ago
awesome movie but that tank commander is such a cunt..
jeffsteadman 5 months ago
Soviet T72's had auto loaders and thus had a crew of 3.
Unit987654321 6 months ago
блин взрывчатка ж еще точно про взрывчатку забыл!!!!!! ах да еще мечеть сюки с рпг взорвали....
Gevst 9 months ago
омг я посмотрел этот фильм! я только сейчас понял стенное значение слова бред=) фильм великолепный советую всем вы сможете проникнуться тем чувством страха которое испытывала съемочная группа к СССР.... в самом начале фильма показывают как советские танкисты с помощью газа огнеметов ядов и авиации уничтожают афганскую деревушку домов в 10 ..... спс поржал...
Gevst 9 months ago 2
There are five of them crewing that tank?
triumph1974 10 months ago
@triumph1974 There suppose to be 4 crew members of that tank (Driver, Gunner, Loader, Commander). The 5th person in the movie is an Afgan officer that is a Observer. Maybe in training to command a tank for the Afgan military!
marinesnip 8 months ago
All that for a missfire ? I think not ! The breachblock closed and locked so the round seated correctly. The tank wouldn't have blown up, the could have gone off by it's self and the gun would funtion normaly, ejecting the spent caseing. Or they could just have unlaoded it and thrown the shell out. Hollywood realy needs to start getting shit right ....
Herbymac0811 11 months ago
where ist the autoloader?!
Anderas777 1 year ago
a crew of 5?!?
ppitm 1 year ago
@ppitm it was actually a crew of 15 man. but the most of them died by attacking a village. a mujahideen blow up their tanks. and there was a lot russians inside it.
THETANK249 1 year ago
scary stuff! imagine if that happened... :(
drewdunne 1 year ago
This happened to my Dad in WW II while in the Philippine Islands, except with a 155mm howitzer. They pulled the lanyard and....nothing. He said that they all ran like mad, but it never did blow up.
hlaltimus 1 year ago
When I first time seen this movie, it was one of the first about war in afghanistan, it was in french and had some scenes cut off (good work of our regiment's comissar lol), we didn't understand anything what they are talking about, but think that tank commander and crew are heroes and fighting to the last man. How suck it was when I found it with russian subtitles and understood that they are just traitors!
Scoutrussp7 1 year ago
and just for curiosity what the fuck are 5 men doing in a T-55? a tank that wasnt even extensively used? wow.
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
Der Film schildert sehr gut den Irrsinn des Krieges und wie er die Menschen verändert ,würde ihn eher als Antikriegsfilm bezeichnen!
bachkrabbler 1 year ago
american russians lol
kidri0t 1 year ago
I saw this yesterday. It was really good.
meercat666 1 year ago
Haha, Samad runs like a girl.
Bf2009 1 year ago
5 people in a T-55 haha sure its useless propaganda
JASHVEER22 1 year ago
Hollywood propaganda
PowerDominion02 2 years ago 9
@PowerDominion02 so fucking true. hollywood has the most disgusting anti-soviet propaganda ever.
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
One of the cool things about this film is that, since we're supposed to identify with the Soviet tankers, they speak unaccented English (like we're understanding Russian), but the Mujahadin all speak Pashtun(?) and there are no subtitles when the Soviet crewman is near them.
barkon 2 years ago
"An interesting film which doesn't take sides and well worth digging up."
Oh no, definitely does not take sides!
rfmikael 2 years ago
Outstanding war film.
It's well worth viewing for any combat film buff.
FiendsInRedSatin1 2 years ago
russia had:tanks helicopters and other vehicles and weapons.
Afghans had: rpg ak-47 and anti air missiles
cant beleve afghans still won those dumb fucks
wewewahid 2 years ago
afghans still have rpg 7s with old warheads and anti air missles and tehy are standing in front of wole NATO which possess the newest technologies
Dollar1998 2 years ago
yea but i got in to the afghan soviet war i researched it really good and i found out that the real cause of the war was the americans the c.i.a.
wewewahid 2 years ago 3
@wewewahid I like your attitude. The only reason the dumb shits won anyway is because the US helped them (which I'm sure you already knew). I'm actually looking for some good books on this war, if you know any offhand it would be greatly appreciated.
go0fy11137 2 years ago
@go0fy11137 fuck the u.s. i did know that already but they only helped with weapons thats it im not taking sides on the war because it was dumb u.s. just had to instogate and turn rebels against communism because afghanistan was an allied comunist country
wewewahid 2 years ago
Actually the muj had some artillery and even a few tanks.
(Read the book The Other Side of the Mountain.)
punipunipunisher 2 years ago
it takes more to win a war than just superior technology and equipment.
whitie1987 2 years ago
i know ..... such as bravery and respect and gaining civilians popularity towards ur side
wewewahid 2 years ago
aFgUnS fOr EvEr....
DoNt mIsS wItH aFgUnZzZzZ...
afghan707 2 years ago
can u tell me some one what's this movie name
4567676 2 years ago
It's called either "The Beast", or "Beast of War", depending on where you look.
LashoutUK 2 years ago 3
@4567676 lol the name is Beast Of War....
jilani111 3 months ago
@4567676 the beast of war
mpolizos 1 month ago
those Russians speak English very well!
eisenkreuzmusik 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Americans have done this film, this is an American propaganda against Russia. These are lies. I know many men who were in Afghanistan, they have never killed never people. American lies
8magnolia8 2 years ago
This movie was filmed in 1991-1992 not 1998. Stephen Baldwin acting as Golikov (gunner). Not famous at that time.
azt76 2 years ago
is this a t72 or a t55?
JTelli786 2 years ago
t55 dressed as a t62
itsconnorstime 2 years ago
thats a t-62 mate, a t-55 has got the fume extractor right at the end of the barrel, and it hasnt got the v-shaped fording plate at the front like the t-72s have.
2paragunner 2 years ago
any body knows...
where can i download this movie?
please
i need this film, cuz i m going to show in the class...
so, if anybody knows....so please tell me!
longikongi 2 years ago
Were Russian tanks of the time even built to handle the climate of the Afghan war?
I know they had some issues with helicopters during all this...
CaptainDahr 2 years ago
i think its cool to watch, a crew hopping out of the tank and legging it. You see this giant metal beast causing destruction but then simple men come running out
poonjoo 3 years ago
This is a great movie...
FireitupBedford 3 years ago 18
I thought a normal T-55/4 will have a crew of 4,not 5
kig132 3 years ago
I think the Afghan is job of guide and translator
santan25 3 years ago
commander, gunner, MG gunner, loader, driver
pkidro 3 years ago
can u download this film plzz
uzibee1 3 years ago
One day USA and UK etc will have to fight the russia its coming beileve me ww3 USA vs russia .
BIGFACE08 3 years ago
what makes you think the UK would back a bunch of slack jawed Yanks over culturaly superior Russians. Ya know a country that have given the world opera's, poetry and great novels ya know a bit more than an hot dog and pepsi.
RogetKing 3 years ago
russia,china, north korea and serbs are a threat to the world .russia are making these nukes and sending them to countries wich will uuse them against other countries .
BIGFACE08 3 years ago
ok your clearly a moron. I have no interest in debating someone who is just going to regurgitate neo con propaganda.
RogetKing 3 years ago
ok kkl but u shouuldnt have replyed to me by the one this film is awesome i want to be a tank boy !!!!
BIGFACE08 3 years ago
Every country is defending its own interests :) Still revelvant a year after.
CoolJeka 2 years ago
thats true but there will always be countries teaming up on each other just look at ww1 and ww2 ??
BIGFACE08 2 years ago
the uk is americas #1 ally if russia goes to war with america america would have: uk, australia, south afrika, afghanistan, canada, france, germany, italy, greece, spain probably on its side oh yea and india and pakistan
Russia would only have:china north korea and fags like that
wewewahid 2 years ago
Afgans not won, russians just leave...
densy79 2 years ago 2
afghans did win russians gone done in size over time mujahadeen grew stronger in size
wewewahid 2 years ago
i would volunteer for that any day
wewewahid 2 years ago
is that a acurate number 1 in ever hundered or has it changed from then
mishmishthe1 3 years ago
No idea actually, I'm sure someone can answer more precisely.
I would have thought the percentage of misfires would have fallen by now, better manufacturing processes and materials but not my area of expertise. I only stuck this up after a conversation elsewhere! :D
LashoutUK 3 years ago
k thanks
mishmishthe1 3 years ago
yeahhhhhhh!
kalewaal 4 years ago
afghan mujahideen won that war. long live afghanistan.
kalewaal 4 years ago
Oook.
Skullstorm17 4 years ago
yeahhhhhhh
kalewaal 4 years ago
Of course they won against Russia, they were being backed by the United States.
gwest100 4 years ago 2
I have this movie
Flamethrower334 4 years ago
Interesting clip. I really thought the tank was toast.
morval99 4 years ago