P.s. SemGroup got their just deserts. They are bankrupt, filing for chapter 11 protection. No government bailout. When they self-destructed, they took at least one Carlyle Group fund down with them. Couldn't happen to nicer guys.
SORRY FOR SPAM but... read Don't laugh at this! Just do it Start thinking something you really really want cause this is astounding the person that sent this to me said their wish came true 10 mins after they read the mail so I thought what the heck You have just been visited by DrSuess's Cat in the Hat. He will grant you one wish Make your wish when the count down is over 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 MAKE A WISH Send this to 10 videos within the hour you read this. If you do your wish will come true
Maybe the tooth fairy and Santa Claus will join Saint Obama in his endeavour to clean up politics.I'm gonna start holding my breath now, so I hope it works.....One, two, three, four.....Maybe Hilary Clinton will help too....five, six, seven e i g h t..... n i n e ..........................
also this antonia may know a little but she has most of it wrong,,honestly drilling for oil is no more harmful to the enviornment than leveling a field and building a shopping center.
enron loophole-yes close it,,thats the only thing i agree with her on.
war for oil-gotta be kidding me-anyone know how much oil weve brought in from iraq or afghanistan? get real!
most dont have a clue on the guiding forces controling this world.its about power
Military industrial complex has more to do with going to war. Look who's making the money though. Oil definatly benefits, those tanks and helicopters don't run on kitten kisses. Not to mention using middle east "stability" as the reason for price gouging at the pump, Even though Exxon reported profits of 1200$ a second last year...
Will Obama reign? That's surely his plan. But will he do it in oil? I would love to see it. Hot oil. But it's not likely to happen. He will reign in the same way Bush did: imperially. Let's talk about getting the US out of Afghanistan! - and a hundred other countries. How about it, Mr. Obama? Yeah, right.
I often enjoy the Real News. But this video is not news. It's socialist propaganda. It is however real. Real stupid.
The only propaganda I see is coming from Faux Noise and CNN, and you are letting it liquifiy your brain. This story is a wake-up call you NEED to listen to, not the other stuff.
Any liquification of my brains can't be due to Fox or CNN, because I killed my television 14 years ago.
The run-up in crude oil did have something to do with the futures market, but not at all the way these two think. It had nothing to do with the Enron loophole. A pipeline company in Oklahoma called SemGroup got into a short squeeze. They lost on their hedges, and went all cowboy berzerk chasing losses. So it was a US commercial that went short, not speculators going long overseas. Google it.
Its just the invention of a handful of rich old white men to make profit through oil. They are so powerful, that the whole world has to fight to take that power back.
Syria is being targeted by the US but yet Syria is not a specifically oil rich nation. In fact they will probably become a net importer of oil in a decade.
I thought it was called "Real" News. There's no guest there to balance out her liberal claims.
The consumer should reign in big oil. But they need an incentive, like the price of oil going up.
But right now, it's dropping. So people aren't likely to switch to something cleaner.
She blames the increase in the price of gas on oil companies, rather than our monetary policy of deliberately lowering the value of our currency, and the foreign policy of bombing places where we get the oil.
she talks about the field where she researched on which doesnt make neither her nor ur other points invalid.its just not her field of expertise.Closing the loophole isnt a liberal view.Waiting until the price goes back up until u start doing sth is way too late and short sighted.Because once it goes up it will skyrocket esp when inflation sets in.
And there's no reason why individuals can't get started now working on alternative fuels. Go right ahead. But that's not the government's responsibility; they don't have the authority to do it, nor would they do it efficiently. It would be a transfer of billions of dollars from taxpayers to large corporations. The government should spend as little taxpayer money as possible, so people keep more of their own and spend it wisely.
There's none to balance O'Liely and the rest of the right-wing fascists on Faux Noise/CNN. Yet, many of the sheeple consider them 'fair & balanced'! I'd rather listen to this news instead, and wish that they'd be already on TV.
You know, Neville, I watched another Real News video, and it said if they had 50,000 people paying $10 a month, or something like that, they could be on TV.
I thought they were doing better than that already. I guess there's still some work to do.
If it weren't oil, it would be something else...like drugs or gold or territory or the power to issue currency. Oil has long been a symptom of imperialism, but its only a symptom. World domination by the elite is the real disease. Whether this quest for oil is the flea wagging the dog, or just its tail...really doesn't matter.
LOL this has got to be the dumbest propaganda ever, now if we reduce our dependence on foreign oil it will cause more wars? hahahahahh WTF? I wish you liberal morons would make up your minds.
Millions have died just to secure resources like oil. NO ONE has died because of a windmill or wind farms, although I don't believe in the usage of them. As for you, you need to turn off Faux Noise.
If anything, without using it, the U.S. will be more aggressive and war-mongering since it won't have to worry about "oil price blowback" or oil being used as a weapon against it.
No wonder Zionists love the "green" movement too. More wars against Arabs withouth worrying about their "oil weapon".
peak oil in short: while oil is a finite resource, the amount of oil that we consume has increased exponentially in the past. it is a mathematical fact that this is unsustainable, that there will be a peak, and after the peak oil consumption will decrease. the bad news: we seem to be at the peak right now. we can make the very strong prediction that the amount of oil production and consumption will decrease, and it will be impossible to do anything about it, we need to adapt.
a video like this should at least mention peak oil.
too few americans know that peak oil is a reality, and peak oil is the BEST reason to decrease dependency on oil and get alternative energy sources started IMMEDIATELY. peak oil turns the dependency of modern agriculture on fossil fuels into a serious problem. this should cause us to realize that we need to decrease dependency of oil not only to decrease the influence of the oil industry, but also to avoid food shortage!
big oil/banks will be regulated by the very people they put into power.
Let me think about it for a second...in other words let's give the fox a second chance with the henhouse or what remains of it.
Just consider the banking side for a second the people put in charge of fixing the financial disaster: Lawrence Summers,Timothy Geithner. These guys happened to be among the architects behind the current financial fiasco (!)
I do not see them motivating the public to do something. I do not see them continueing to stay on the topic that will fix things. I do not see them working in a real way for change. Hell M.S.M. has show it on tv and talked about it alot more then real news so should I cheer for the main stream media and follow them? Under your line of thinking I should.
you are buying into the free-energy-supression conspiracy theory. you believe in methods of energy production that are impossible because they would be in violation of the laws of nature, and that are not supported by scientists.
what really hinders alternative energy sources (REAL alternatives, not the free energy crap you believe in) are the incredibly low fuel prices in the united states, and misdirected gouvernment and corporate funding.
Also I will point out that through hemp seed oil we can totaly abandon fossil fuel oil and free ourselves from this madness. Anyone see the so called real news adressing that? The answer is no! I like the real news for one thing. It allows me to prove to real intelectual people that even though it's a better looking box the shit inside the box is still the same product. Now paraide some more phd socialists on screen and continue to lie to the people as normal you losers.
Oil will be gone one day. Waiting for it to run out is more dangerous then in a limited exchange of nukes right now. Im hopeing that more people not just become informed about whos controling who and support political systems that are not owned by Big Any Corporation.
The problem is, just like being pregnant, there is no 'limited' or partly in either. Once nukes fly, expect stock piles to be emptied.
I know the genie is sooooo out of the bottle now, but Corporations should be banned just as torture is supposed to be. For basically the same reasons I might add.
I love how the real news is supposed to be about the people and yet instead of attacking the fed reserve as the real problem they blame bush policies as the problem. The real news looks and talks like it is for the people yet it still does the same old thing as other news sources. Ducks the real problems and truths and continues to blame short site issues for a 150 year old root problem.
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
rebelliouseoagj 1 year ago
Man these are two ugly chics.
kefkahkefkah 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In May 2009, Petrobras enters into negotiations with China for a $10 billion loan for off shore oil drilling.
In August 15, George Soros buys $811 million in stock of Petrobras, a 22% stake.
On August 18, 2009, the Obama Administration approved a $2 billion dollar loan to Petrobras S.A. for the purpose of off shore drilling.
Nov 4, 2009, China and Petrobras finalize $10 billion deal started in May.
Guess who gets the oil? China
LordPillsbury1959 2 years ago
couldnt they find a better person to talk i couldnt take that man dike serious im sorry
anilraj420 3 years ago
P.s. SemGroup got their just deserts. They are bankrupt, filing for chapter 11 protection. No government bailout. When they self-destructed, they took at least one Carlyle Group fund down with them. Couldn't happen to nicer guys.
JiveDadson 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lucario1545 3 years ago
Maybe the tooth fairy and Santa Claus will join Saint Obama in his endeavour to clean up politics.I'm gonna start holding my breath now, so I hope it works.....One, two, three, four.....Maybe Hilary Clinton will help too....five, six, seven e i g h t..... n i n e ..........................
mushroomagicman 3 years ago
this video discredits real news as news.
also this antonia may know a little but she has most of it wrong,,honestly drilling for oil is no more harmful to the enviornment than leveling a field and building a shopping center.
enron loophole-yes close it,,thats the only thing i agree with her on.
war for oil-gotta be kidding me-anyone know how much oil weve brought in from iraq or afghanistan? get real!
most dont have a clue on the guiding forces controling this world.its about power
bbrand5150 3 years ago
Military industrial complex has more to do with going to war. Look who's making the money though. Oil definatly benefits, those tanks and helicopters don't run on kitten kisses. Not to mention using middle east "stability" as the reason for price gouging at the pump, Even though Exxon reported profits of 1200$ a second last year...
Xakryn 3 years ago
How much oil has been brought in from Iraq and Afghanistan? Are you saying the war wasn't for oil, or was?
Gugguggug 3 years ago
Spelling: not "reign" in, but "rein" in.
Fersommling 3 years ago
Yeah, I wonder if RN was trying to use a pun there.
MooseOfReason 3 years ago
Will Obama reign? That's surely his plan. But will he do it in oil? I would love to see it. Hot oil. But it's not likely to happen. He will reign in the same way Bush did: imperially. Let's talk about getting the US out of Afghanistan! - and a hundred other countries. How about it, Mr. Obama? Yeah, right.
I often enjoy the Real News. But this video is not news. It's socialist propaganda. It is however real. Real stupid.
JiveDadson 3 years ago
The only propaganda I see is coming from Faux Noise and CNN, and you are letting it liquifiy your brain. This story is a wake-up call you NEED to listen to, not the other stuff.
Neville6000 3 years ago
Any liquification of my brains can't be due to Fox or CNN, because I killed my television 14 years ago.
The run-up in crude oil did have something to do with the futures market, but not at all the way these two think. It had nothing to do with the Enron loophole. A pipeline company in Oklahoma called SemGroup got into a short squeeze. They lost on their hedges, and went all cowboy berzerk chasing losses. So it was a US commercial that went short, not speculators going long overseas. Google it.
JiveDadson 3 years ago
thank you. u are a light in increasingly dark times
famousashtray 3 years ago
Very good interview. Thanks Real News.
NWKBricks1 3 years ago 2
Using "reign" in may seem correct, but it should be rein in!
jqjacobs 3 years ago
Its just the invention of a handful of rich old white men to make profit through oil. They are so powerful, that the whole world has to fight to take that power back.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
Too much emphasis on oil.
Syria is being targeted by the US but yet Syria is not a specifically oil rich nation. In fact they will probably become a net importer of oil in a decade.
arbide2 3 years ago
Syria is geographically situated in a highly desirable strategic location, so it is quite logical that the US thugs are targeting it too.
Vierotchka 3 years ago
I thought it was called "Real" News. There's no guest there to balance out her liberal claims.
The consumer should reign in big oil. But they need an incentive, like the price of oil going up.
But right now, it's dropping. So people aren't likely to switch to something cleaner.
She blames the increase in the price of gas on oil companies, rather than our monetary policy of deliberately lowering the value of our currency, and the foreign policy of bombing places where we get the oil.
MooseOfReason 3 years ago
she talks about the field where she researched on which doesnt make neither her nor ur other points invalid.its just not her field of expertise.Closing the loophole isnt a liberal view.Waiting until the price goes back up until u start doing sth is way too late and short sighted.Because once it goes up it will skyrocket esp when inflation sets in.
jonz23m 3 years ago
Jonz, What loophole are you talking about?
And there's no reason why individuals can't get started now working on alternative fuels. Go right ahead. But that's not the government's responsibility; they don't have the authority to do it, nor would they do it efficiently. It would be a transfer of billions of dollars from taxpayers to large corporations. The government should spend as little taxpayer money as possible, so people keep more of their own and spend it wisely.
MooseOfReason 3 years ago
There's none to balance O'Liely and the rest of the right-wing fascists on Faux Noise/CNN. Yet, many of the sheeple consider them 'fair & balanced'! I'd rather listen to this news instead, and wish that they'd be already on TV.
Neville6000 3 years ago
You know, Neville, I watched another Real News video, and it said if they had 50,000 people paying $10 a month, or something like that, they could be on TV.
I thought they were doing better than that already. I guess there's still some work to do.
MooseOfReason 3 years ago
If it weren't oil, it would be something else...like drugs or gold or territory or the power to issue currency. Oil has long been a symptom of imperialism, but its only a symptom. World domination by the elite is the real disease. Whether this quest for oil is the flea wagging the dog, or just its tail...really doesn't matter.
OmarThePug 3 years ago 2
the real news is a great idea,
only problem is,
it sure seems they have an agenda.
Bblackjackk 3 years ago
So does Faux Noise! And your point is....?
Neville6000 3 years ago
LOL this has got to be the dumbest propaganda ever, now if we reduce our dependence on foreign oil it will cause more wars? hahahahahh WTF? I wish you liberal morons would make up your minds.
jwein8282000 3 years ago
Please try to listen to what she's saying before you open your mouth.
Neville6000 3 years ago
NO BLOOD FOR WINDMILLS!
jwein8282000 3 years ago
Millions have died just to secure resources like oil. NO ONE has died because of a windmill or wind farms, although I don't believe in the usage of them. As for you, you need to turn off Faux Noise.
Neville6000 3 years ago
Canada NOT part of USA. Proxy wars, that does sound likely.
McOath 3 years ago
THis idiocy that "eliminatinfg our dependecny on oil" will end U.S. interventionism is really annoying and laughable.
Even if the U.S. didn'y use a single drop of oil, it would still seek to dominate its oil-producing regions for geo-political leverage.
\/
Webins 3 years ago 2
/\
If anything, without using it, the U.S. will be more aggressive and war-mongering since it won't have to worry about "oil price blowback" or oil being used as a weapon against it.
No wonder Zionists love the "green" movement too. More wars against Arabs withouth worrying about their "oil weapon".
Webins 3 years ago
... continued
peak oil in short: while oil is a finite resource, the amount of oil that we consume has increased exponentially in the past. it is a mathematical fact that this is unsustainable, that there will be a peak, and after the peak oil consumption will decrease. the bad news: we seem to be at the peak right now. we can make the very strong prediction that the amount of oil production and consumption will decrease, and it will be impossible to do anything about it, we need to adapt.
kurtilein3 3 years ago
a video like this should at least mention peak oil.
too few americans know that peak oil is a reality, and peak oil is the BEST reason to decrease dependency on oil and get alternative energy sources started IMMEDIATELY. peak oil turns the dependency of modern agriculture on fossil fuels into a serious problem. this should cause us to realize that we need to decrease dependency of oil not only to decrease the influence of the oil industry, but also to avoid food shortage!
kurtilein3 3 years ago
She fucking nail's it!
ineyeseek 3 years ago
big oil/banks will be regulated by the very people they put into power.
Let me think about it for a second...in other words let's give the fox a second chance with the henhouse or what remains of it.
Just consider the banking side for a second the people put in charge of fixing the financial disaster: Lawrence Summers,Timothy Geithner. These guys happened to be among the architects behind the current financial fiasco (!)
Am I the only one finding this picture wrong?
mounir1426 3 years ago
I do not see them motivating the public to do something. I do not see them continueing to stay on the topic that will fix things. I do not see them working in a real way for change. Hell M.S.M. has show it on tv and talked about it alot more then real news so should I cheer for the main stream media and follow them? Under your line of thinking I should.
Edgrot 3 years ago
The "Bush" agenda is a scam. The world wealthiest people are deeply involved in oil or "fossil fuels".
In the 1960s the central banks changed the backing of world currency to oil. Who "needs" gold? People "need" oil.
The oil industry is VERY active in eliminating ALL "alternative" energy sources & has been for DECADES!
Why? Because the rich own the "grid" (any "line" coming into YOUR home.)
The elite have bought out inovations in energy & even KILLED inventors who threaten their power.
t4705mb6 3 years ago 5
+10 thumbs if i could
FREE PAUL PANTONE!!!
Crusading4Truth 3 years ago
This is getting REALLY serious. The "gentry" feels backed into a corner because of their .....uncountable crimes against humanity.
They are being exposed and intend to bring out their "big guns" in order to keep control.
Expect Obama to be killed (These guys don't WANT us to "hope"!). Expect a new HUGE 911. Expect martial law. Expect WW 3. Expect starvation.
These TURDS are cornered & turning VERY dangerous! This is their "last ditch" effort, their last stand.
It WON'T be pretty!
t4705mb6 3 years ago 2
t4705mb6:
you are buying into the free-energy-supression conspiracy theory. you believe in methods of energy production that are impossible because they would be in violation of the laws of nature, and that are not supported by scientists.
what really hinders alternative energy sources (REAL alternatives, not the free energy crap you believe in) are the incredibly low fuel prices in the united states, and misdirected gouvernment and corporate funding.
kurtilein3 3 years ago
Whos talking "free"?? Me?? I'm talking OFF THE GRID.
Nothing in the world of the greedy is "free". Nothing.
t4705mb6 3 years ago 4
Also I will point out that through hemp seed oil we can totaly abandon fossil fuel oil and free ourselves from this madness. Anyone see the so called real news adressing that? The answer is no! I like the real news for one thing. It allows me to prove to real intelectual people that even though it's a better looking box the shit inside the box is still the same product. Now paraide some more phd socialists on screen and continue to lie to the people as normal you losers.
Edgrot 3 years ago
Oil will be gone one day. Waiting for it to run out is more dangerous then in a limited exchange of nukes right now. Im hopeing that more people not just become informed about whos controling who and support political systems that are not owned by Big Any Corporation.
cycimian 3 years ago
The problem is, just like being pregnant, there is no 'limited' or partly in either. Once nukes fly, expect stock piles to be emptied.
I know the genie is sooooo out of the bottle now, but Corporations should be banned just as torture is supposed to be. For basically the same reasons I might add.
Plutonwolf 3 years ago
I love how the real news is supposed to be about the people and yet instead of attacking the fed reserve as the real problem they blame bush policies as the problem. The real news looks and talks like it is for the people yet it still does the same old thing as other news sources. Ducks the real problems and truths and continues to blame short site issues for a 150 year old root problem.
Edgrot 3 years ago
You committed a major Ooops! The term is "rein in" and not "reign in". :)
Vierotchka 3 years ago 2
Unless it is an extremely clever pun aimed at the truthers.
Plutonwolf 3 years ago
very interesting. Thank you !
prosepp 3 years ago