Reason Two for putting Ron Paul in the White House

[wp4565775]

Yahoo for Ron Paul!

[mdeleplank]

Wow I can't believe they're allowed to do this in the United States of America.

[ctrackmonger]

all it takes is a few people to stand up and say that is brutality. The people will come around when they realize others have morals and will stand together.

[ctrackmonger]

If I was there there would be me getting tazed when I am slapping the shit out of one of those cops.

[thomasmoonman]

im going to jail with this guy if he is my friend, on the floor being tazed for asking a legitimate question, those cops would have a 5 on2 situation real fast.....for sure.

[verbvideo]

What was the guy behind the two officers motioning right before they grabbed him? As if he was saying, stop the question and remove this guy. Anyone else see this?

[DalevisLives]

Anyone who would defend the actions of the officers, regardless of what the student did, has already began to succumb to the mind-numbing tactics of the Globalists, which want us to accept Government Corruption as the norm, and just "give in" to it...

[dlondon1144]

Amen.

[Goobyusa]

Here is a video showing the questions the student asked - he was trying to make a point before asking the question. I don't believe there is a law against doing that.

/watch?v=wXa6yj-A-mw&feature=r­elated

The student is afraid and when he finally gets an answer to the question of what did I do, he gets the stupid answer he is being arrested for inciting a riot! What a load of bull. Guess you MUST respect politicians and police (even though they are no higher than the rest of us).

[Goobyusa]

Just a reminder to those who disagree - the job of the police is to UPHOLD THE EXISTING LAWS. They are not to fabricate a reason for arrest after the fact. Unless someone can show me where the law has been changed that says a person no longer has a right to preface a question or to ask uncomfortable questions, then this student did nothing wrong. Does anyone know how things turned out for this young man? God Bless him, he had courage to ask the tough questions and to expose Kerry & S&B's.

[dlondon1144]

Very good point aboutupholding existing laws, Gooby. There is, actually, constitutional injunction against arresting a person first and then making up a law to try him with (no ex post facto laws).

[dlondon1144]

I invited 4951WEDDEL to post a video response and drop the matter and he ignored me, choosing to continue his tirade. Despite his allegation to the contrary, 20 of the 45 posts on this thread (not including this one) are 4951WEDDEL's. They are all saying essentially the same thing. That says SPAM to me. 4951WEDDEL has been blocked.

[Goobyusa]

Did you watch it? He asks questions and is taken into custody. Kerry offers to answer but they are already arresting the student and of course he cries out since this is unconstitutional - he did nothing threatening or wrong. He asked an uncomfortable question. Since when is this a crime? We didn't get to hear Kerry's answer (how convenient).

[4951WEDDEL]

Watch the Whole video from start to finish. He is suppose to ask Kerry a question, then SHUT UP to hear Kerry's answer. He does not, but proceeds to ask another question, and then another. He was not asked to leave because of his questions, but because of his REFUSAL to give back the microphone. Finally, they shut off the microphone, and have him escorted out. By then, it was too late. Had he simply shown a little respect and listened to Kerry's answer, we all would have heard it. BLAME THE KID!

[dlondon1144]

Attention all and sundry - I don't want to stifle your enthuisiasm for commenting on this video but if make the same point over and over and over, I am going to get tired of you and then phhtt! You're gone.

[Goobyusa]

Sorry, I'll try to restrain my enthusiasm. :o)

Ron Paul 08!

[4951WEDDEL]

The whole premise of this video is flawed. There was no abuse of constitutional rights in what happen to this young man. He is entitled to free speech, but not in a forum where he is a guest. The idea that electing Ron Paul would change this anyway is flawed as well. Electing Ron Paul president would not change anything in regards to the Constitution.

[dlondon1144]

4951Weddel - if you have a problem with this video, post a video response and let it go. You are spamming this thread.

[4951WEDDEL]

How am I spamming this thread by responding to the comments of others? Is it that questioning the whole "Ron Paul" philosophy is wrong?

[Goobyusa]

Precisely. He would uphold the Constitution - NOT CHANGE IT, which is what the current government is doing bit by bit! He would protect the Constitution and abide by it - It IS the law of the land. We the people need to stand strong to protect the Constitution that our forefathers bled and died to give us! Freedom & Liberty are precious treasures, not to be tossed about like cheap garbage! God Bless America. Vote Ron Paul 08

[4951WEDDEL]

You mean he would uphold his interpretation of it. Sorry it does not work that way. President's don't get to be the final authority on the Constitution. Ron and well as you seem to forget that.

[jkasten89]

The majority of these comments are missing the point. Yes, the kid was being disrespectful and resisting arrest, but the arrest was illegal in the first place. He was not told, before the police began to restrain him, what he was being arrested for.

He CAN be asked to leave the building if it is private property or if he is violation of a law, but he wasn't.

Disrespect of an officer isn't nice, but it doesn't warrant illegal treatment. This is a nation of LAWS, not politeness.

[dlondon1144]

This is the main point of the video. Thanks for comenting.

[dlondon1144]

This is the main point of the video. Thanks for comenting.

[4951WEDDEL]

No, you are missing the point. The officers spoke to him several times. He refused to comply with the officers' instructions. He resisted the officers when they were escorting him out. He was clearly in the wrong, and the officers acting appropriately.

[jkasten89]

Excuse me if I'm wrong, but isn't it required that the police tell him what he's being arrested for, and isn't it also required that they arrest him for valid reasons? It could be that this was private property and the police were directed by whoever had control of the building (off camera). Otherwise, I don't know of a reason for his arrest (please correct me if I'm wrong). At the very lest, he was not told what he was being arrested for, which is law (again correct me if I'm mistaken).

[4951WEDDEL]

They do not have to inform any specific time. In fact, I don't think it was their intention to arrest him until he resisted being removed. He was the instigator of the whole situation.

[4951WEDDEL]

He was in violation of the law. He was disrupting a public event by not yielding the microphone and refusing the requests of the police to leave. He wanted a confrontation, and he got one.

[jkasten89]

What law? The police never asked him to leave (unless it was off microphone) and who was he supposed to yield the microphone to? Maybe it was off camera, but I can't distinguish anybody. Given the information I can get from the video, I can't determine that anything illegal was being done. If I'm missing something, please tell me specifically what it is.

[IvyMikeBomb]

NO he has the right to speak and listen closely he was cooperating with the police.

3:40 "I'll walk out of here if you let me go"

I don't think he did anything extreme enough to be arrested...

[4951WEDDEL]

If you watch the whole video from start to finish you will see he was the one causing the problems. Ultimately, they turned off the microphone. He should be respectful of the officers. Once he resisted, it was too late to just let him go.

[dlondon1144]

Please note that use of profanity in this thread will result in your comment being removed.

[clarisd]

So I see many of you washed masses, that seem to think you really know what's going on and maybe you do. But then why waste your time and talent on this? I am USM and live in Italy and I see alot of this happening all over the planet. So no Big Deal that it is happening in the US. But the illness always has symptems. I also here him say he would walk out of here. I would have at that point as a trained officer,I would have picked him up and walked him out. All this did is damage Kerry.

[4951WEDDEL]

They tried to nicely remove him and he resisted.

[4951WEDDEL]

Now you are really misrepresenting things. This clip is carefully edited. This young man ask several questions, and REFUSED to allow John Kerry to answer. When asked, he refused to yield the microphone. He refused to leave when the police asked him, and then resist being escorted out. THIS IS NOT INDICATION OF FASCISM. This young man broken the law, and was arrested for doing so. He was tasered because you refused to comply with the officers.

[pure1warrior]

We March we march we march there is never a better time to stand up it will never be safer or easier to stand up how can we stand by and listen to the crys of help from another human that is being attacked like that and do nothing> help help help cant you hear it?

[jaxxfat]

Fascism has been growing in America for over 60+ years but slowly now is spiraling and its very scary for anyone who has been watching it.

[pure1warrior]

The MSM media made it into a funny joke. Dont taze me bro/ but its an attack on one of us and all those other men stood by and lifted not a hand to help the young man. Every man in that room I say shame on you and you deserve what you get.

[4951WEDDEL]

You are both full of baloney. This young man got what he asked for. He deserved what he got.

[robbin312]

RON PAUL 2008

[librano]

land of the free? home of the brave?

how come ron paul videos aren't featured on youtube... esp now when its most needed?

[jaxxfat]

i thought they were

[hdrider883r]

vote ron paul

[gsuitter]

HSPD 51, over my dead body.

[Goobyusa]

The thing people forget is that the police are no more superior as citizens than the young man being arrested (without any explanation as to what he did wrong). Since when has it become a crime to ask uncomfortable questions? What's more scary is the crowd applauding when he is forcibly removed to the back of the room. He asks what he as done but is not given an explanation.  He asks for these 'people' to remove their hands from him and he'll leave. He asks NOT to be tazed. WAKE UP PEOPLE!

[4951WEDDEL]

He knew what he did wrong. He was told to yield the floor and the microphone and refused. He became confrontational with the police. He resisted and escalated the situation. They cuffed him. He should have listen to the officers to begin with and nothing would have happened.

[clarisd]

Absolutely, as I said the law played it worse and they should have taking this guy out of the hall. The guy did do this to himself. But the cops should have been smarter and so should Kerry. He should have stepped in and stopped it, it almost seemed like a plant.

[4951WEDDEL]

The officers tried several times but he refused to listen and disrespected them.

[clarisd]

I think by reviewing the entire vid we would see it in a whole new light, however I am with you on the fact that the student did this to himself and he wanted mostly to cast the worset light on kerry. There are setups everywhere and kerry should have seen this for what it was, a setup.

[4951WEDDEL]

Actually, Kerry attempts to intervene on the young man's behalf. However it was too late because the young man had already resisted the officers. The young man simply would not let Kerry respond to his questions. Each time, before Kerry could finish an answer, he would start in on another one, then another. The lesson that should be learned from this is: Don't disrespect the police.

[clarisd]

I am a 24yr USM and I tell you that the Officers in this, should have carries him all the way out of the hall and then cuff him, and all training of the use of tasers, tell a officer to respect the device as if it were any weapon, ie a gun. The officers did not have to tase, why? up to 5 Officers had him on the ground then because they were in my view, lazy. He was cuffed. This was to damage Kerry, and I tell you it was staged, and the officers played the roll and it hurt Kerry.

[4951WEDDEL]

You are confused. This event occurs AFTER John Kerry had already LOST the election. The young man was intent on embarrassing Kerry. The taser was used to avoid the possibility of injuring him. They did not want to have a wrestling match.

[clarisd]

Yeah but it still seems like a set up. And you are right, he had to be subdued, but I have been tased and it is not always the case that it will emobilize the subject completely.

I did hear Kerry say thats alright let me answer his question. But still Kerry should have come out and stopped it. Kerry would have looked like the hero.

[Goobyusa]

Uh, didn't the student offer to leave of his own accord? They refused to allow him to leave - insisting on cuffing him and he had the right to ask why he was being arrested! Can you imagine this happening at a meeting of our forefathers? This is sick and it matters not whether it was staged. What matters is that WE THE PEOPLE are being threatened if we dare ask a difficult question. BTW, we didn't get to hear Kerry's answer! This kid was exposing Kerry, that's all. Guess it's not allowed!

[4951WEDDEL]

The kid would not let Kerry answer. He kept asking question after question until they finally turn off the microphone. The kid was disturbing the peace, resisting arrest, and refusing to comply with the officers.

[Goobyusa]

How is asking what he has done, resisting??? I would resist arrest too if the police were trying to stifle my freedom (freedom of speech)to ask a question and if the police refused to give me an answer on what I had done wrong? He was taking his turn at the microphone! If you people think it's ok to arrest someone because they were asking an uncomfortable question to a candidate, then you are already mentally brainwashed to accept a Police State for your own good! Sad, very sad indeed.

[4951WEDDEL]

The police were NOT trying to stifle his freedom of speech. He was stifling the freedom of the people who were there to hear John Kerry. The young man asked his question, then before Kerry answered, asked another, and another. He refused to yield the microphone. He refuse the police requests to leave the room. He resisted by pulling away from them and making a scene.

[Goobyusa]

I heard ...ALSO, are you a member of Skull & Bones......He refused to yield the microphone to WHOM? The police who were about to arrest him??? He said at one point "I'll walk out of here" but they carried on cuffing him.

[Goobyusa]

on trying to cuff him. He made a scene because the police would not tell him why he was being arrested. I'd have done the same thing! And the saddest part is the room full of dumbed down students who clapped when this guy was being unfairly arrested. Are today's students so ignorant of the Constitution that they can't recognize when the young man's rights were being violated? You're not that young are you? Did you study the Constitution in Government class?

[4951WEDDEL]

He made a scene because they were taking away his "limelight". The young man's right were not violated. He was given his opportunity to ask his question, and he attempted to take over the whole program. The organizers and the police tried several times nicely to get him to yield the microphone. At one point, he turns around and tells off the officer with words like "he (Kerry) has spoken for two hours, now it's my turn". He was not entitled to "turn".

[4951WEDDEL]

He said only after RESISTING them. By then, it was too late.

[Goobyusa]

Resisting arrest because they refused to answer his questions: What have I done? Why are you arresting me? Under the Constitution, they MUST give him a reason for an arrest and HE (part of WE THE PEOPLE) has the right to know why he is being arrested! Geesh, do you not know your rights???

[4951WEDDEL]

Have you even watched the video? The young man NEVER gives Kerry a chance to answer any of his questions. He just keeps on ranting and refusing to yield the microphone. After several attempts to get him to shut up, the police are forced to remove him for causing a disturbance. They were trying to do this quietly and without a fuse. He was the one running and screaming. He would not listen to them just as he would not listen to Kerry's answers to his question.