There is no doubt that Sills' voice became worn before she retired. However, no one made me believe what she was selling more than she does. Her total commitment and passion were extraordinary. I love Sutherland and Caballe for their extraordinary talent but I love Sills because she sang each character as if being that person was the most important thing in the world at that moment.
yes indeed it took me 15 years to discover her 2-3 roles where she was truly Divine (Palmira, Marie and Cleopatra) because due to her obsession with Callas she kept singing roles she couldnt sing (Norma Bolena Elisabeta) even in her dreams
In these 2-3 roles she was truly divine
Btw after 21 years I still havent found any role or performance where Horne was truly divine, so I lost my hope
@LohengrinT When you say she couldn't sing Elisabeta.... surely you can't mean the role in Roberto Deveraux...! I have the live DVD from Wolf's Trapp and she is perfect beyond words.
In the other DVD I have of her as Marie... her "divine role", I don't like her actually. She sounds outdated and she sings it in English.
@LohengrinT Well ok, I don't have any other recording of this amazing opera, Callas never touched it unfortunatelly.... But Beverly creates a tragic heroine that "convinces" me. And I'm not a musician to go buy the partitura to learn it and imagine how someone else should have sung it. This is what I have, one Devereux, one Vestale, one Agnese, one Pirata, one Poliuto...
Do you have another, more true-to-the-composer, recorded interpretation to suggest?
Sutherland was very very efficient as Norma, descent, Sills was LOL also as Bolena (uber screamy LOL) also as Elisabetta (hearing a canary screaming to prove she was assoluta).
no it is just the taste of someone who does not like singers over stretching themselves in order to sing what they couldnt sing (Im referring to her Bolena Norma Elisabeta etc where she was totally ridiculous).
In the repertoire that was written fo her voice like Pamira, Cleopatra, Fille du Regimen she was truly Divine.
Then the "Callas syndrome" got her: I have to sing whatever Callas sang" - there the atrocities began like with so many other pure coloraturas
@LohengrinT I can understand you not caring for her Bolena, Elisabetta, and Norma, even though I don't agree (especially in regards to the Donizetti), but surely Pamira, Cleopatra, and la Fille weren't her only good, pure coloratura roles?
well I wont study the entire catalog of Sills, like I did with Sutherland, to locate the very very very! few moments she was truly Divine, I lost my patience with Sutherland ahahahaha
Yes Sills was atrocious as Bolena, Norma and Elisabetta (at last we can say that without the fear of the Sillsian Queens :)) but indeed she had her true moments of Divinity as Palmira (in La Scala not in her studio one) and as Marie and Cleopatra (although as Cleopatra she acted terribly)
she was also atrocious as Manon and Thais because she had lost her voice when she sang those roles plus she never had the lower voice to sing those roles to begin with. In her poor mind (she was incredibly stupid) she thought she had a lower register thus isntead of staying in the upper tuned pure coloratura roles she went into pretending she was Callas - her courtyard (the staccati lovers) preotected her for many years - truth at the end always comes out ;)
it is extremely sad spectacle to see an Opera Singer trapped within an environment of idiotic gays that actually decide what the singer should sing. Same thing has happened to Gruberova the last 15 years - same thing with Sutherland - I dont mind that 80% of opera fans are gays, I do mind that their complete lack of respect towards Music leads the opera singers into singing atrociously
THIS is SiIls at her best. Fortunately i heard her many times with the NYC Opera when she sounded like this. By the time she sang this at the Met. - it was labored and "that sound" was gone. Oh, those at the NYC Opera still linger in my memory.
@StuartLou The recording I have of her singing this when she sang it at the Met, I love it dearly. So her voice was a bit older and maybe slightly worn, but it was still breathtakingly fabulous and brought me to tears!
What an apt description:divine fragility indeed. Of all the different emotions Sills achieved in her singing: anger, humour, sadness, mischievousness, et al, this fragility was uniquely and touchingly hers. Thanks for posting.
Pamira in Siege of Corinth is a challenging role. It calls for a flexible and high soprano voice. Sills had what it took to nail the part; she and Marilyn Horne had great success at La Scala with this role; and she also sang it at the Met. Great stuff! Brava Beverly Sills
Miss Sills is not only a voice (here) "she" is an "anima" ! She is also an instrument of the orchestra...To me , she has been definetly the ONLY one who undestound all what Callas brought to the operatic world
There is no doubt that Sills' voice became worn before she retired. However, no one made me believe what she was selling more than she does. Her total commitment and passion were extraordinary. I love Sutherland and Caballe for their extraordinary talent but I love Sills because she sang each character as if being that person was the most important thing in the world at that moment.
kc55mo 5 months ago
@kc55mo
yes indeed it took me 15 years to discover her 2-3 roles where she was truly Divine (Palmira, Marie and Cleopatra) because due to her obsession with Callas she kept singing roles she couldnt sing (Norma Bolena Elisabeta) even in her dreams
In these 2-3 roles she was truly divine
Btw after 21 years I still havent found any role or performance where Horne was truly divine, so I lost my hope
LohengrinT 5 months ago
@LohengrinT When you say she couldn't sing Elisabeta.... surely you can't mean the role in Roberto Deveraux...! I have the live DVD from Wolf's Trapp and she is perfect beyond words.
In the other DVD I have of her as Marie... her "divine role", I don't like her actually. She sounds outdated and she sings it in English.
DemisLian 3 months ago
@DemisLian
the reason u think she is fabulous in Devereux is because u have never heard how this role is supposed to be sung - she has molested it ;)
LohengrinT 3 months ago
@LohengrinT Well ok, I don't have any other recording of this amazing opera, Callas never touched it unfortunatelly.... But Beverly creates a tragic heroine that "convinces" me. And I'm not a musician to go buy the partitura to learn it and imagine how someone else should have sung it. This is what I have, one Devereux, one Vestale, one Agnese, one Pirata, one Poliuto...
Do you have another, more true-to-the-composer, recorded interpretation to suggest?
DemisLian 3 months ago
@DemisLian
none, a truly great performance of Devereux did not occur in the 20th century
LohengrinT 3 months ago
@WiseMonkey888
in the studio one the wobble has begun
Sutherland was very very efficient as Norma, descent, Sills was LOL also as Bolena (uber screamy LOL) also as Elisabetta (hearing a canary screaming to prove she was assoluta).
Sad spectacles driven by psychopathic ambition
LohengrinT 6 months ago
Certainly attempts to over stretch in any endeavour, certainly in singing also,
can lead to further problems, a degree of failure, and bring about some
loss of respect among some in the audience.
Human ambitions often induce us to stretch ourselves, beyond limits.
Sometimes we cannot be sure till we try. :)
Sometimes others pressure singers to do so. C'est la vie.
She seems to have survived without any permanent problems. :)
She will be mainly remembered for the excellent singing of much.
operafan0anegnd 7 months ago
"anti Sills" ???
Is that an extremely distressing, psychological state,
akin to insanity? :) I am not familiar with this condition. :)
Hope there is a cure. :)
Perhaps some people may reflect a little divinity. :)
operafan0anegnd 7 months ago
@operafan0anegnd
no it is just the taste of someone who does not like singers over stretching themselves in order to sing what they couldnt sing (Im referring to her Bolena Norma Elisabeta etc where she was totally ridiculous).
In the repertoire that was written fo her voice like Pamira, Cleopatra, Fille du Regimen she was truly Divine.
Then the "Callas syndrome" got her: I have to sing whatever Callas sang" - there the atrocities began like with so many other pure coloraturas
LohengrinT 7 months ago
@LohengrinT I can understand you not caring for her Bolena, Elisabetta, and Norma, even though I don't agree (especially in regards to the Donizetti), but surely Pamira, Cleopatra, and la Fille weren't her only good, pure coloratura roles?
90lysander 6 months ago
@90lysander
well I wont study the entire catalog of Sills, like I did with Sutherland, to locate the very very very! few moments she was truly Divine, I lost my patience with Sutherland ahahahaha
Yes Sills was atrocious as Bolena, Norma and Elisabetta (at last we can say that without the fear of the Sillsian Queens :)) but indeed she had her true moments of Divinity as Palmira (in La Scala not in her studio one) and as Marie and Cleopatra (although as Cleopatra she acted terribly)
LohengrinT 6 months ago
@90lysander
she was also atrocious as Manon and Thais because she had lost her voice when she sang those roles plus she never had the lower voice to sing those roles to begin with. In her poor mind (she was incredibly stupid) she thought she had a lower register thus isntead of staying in the upper tuned pure coloratura roles she went into pretending she was Callas - her courtyard (the staccati lovers) preotected her for many years - truth at the end always comes out ;)
LohengrinT 6 months ago
@90lysander
it is extremely sad spectacle to see an Opera Singer trapped within an environment of idiotic gays that actually decide what the singer should sing. Same thing has happened to Gruberova the last 15 years - same thing with Sutherland - I dont mind that 80% of opera fans are gays, I do mind that their complete lack of respect towards Music leads the opera singers into singing atrociously
It is the Gay Mafia you know :))
LohengrinT 6 months ago
Hi, LohengrinT.
You must have me confused with somebody else. I am not an anti-fan of anyone.
I try to appreciate each and every artist I hear. Some I like a lot more, some less.
Those I like less, I do not bother to listen to again as much. I do not register dislike
for any video nor make negative comments. I do sometimes say this singer is not as good as that one. I simply deselect those I like less.
BTW I really love most of Beverley Sills performances.
Only describe the Creator as divine.
operafan0anegnd 7 months ago
@operafan0anegnd
Ι am the die-hard anti Sills fan not you
For me both the Creator and the Interpreter can be divine
LohengrinT 7 months ago
So amazingly beautiful. Love it.
operafan0anegnd 7 months ago
@operafan0anegnd
well and this is coming from a die-hard Sills anti-fan, Sills is Divine in this role
LohengrinT 7 months ago
THIS is SiIls at her best. Fortunately i heard her many times with the NYC Opera when she sounded like this. By the time she sang this at the Met. - it was labored and "that sound" was gone. Oh, those at the NYC Opera still linger in my memory.
StuartLou 11 months ago
@StuartLou The recording I have of her singing this when she sang it at the Met, I love it dearly. So her voice was a bit older and maybe slightly worn, but it was still breathtakingly fabulous and brought me to tears!
godivapaw 11 months ago
What an apt description:divine fragility indeed. Of all the different emotions Sills achieved in her singing: anger, humour, sadness, mischievousness, et al, this fragility was uniquely and touchingly hers. Thanks for posting.
looksee26 1 year ago
She is sooooo GREAT in this!! HEr Callas and Sutherland all had their own Rossini heroine to triumph in,....I love Bev!!
arturo8402 1 year ago
Pamira in Siege of Corinth is a challenging role. It calls for a flexible and high soprano voice. Sills had what it took to nail the part; she and Marilyn Horne had great success at La Scala with this role; and she also sang it at the Met. Great stuff! Brava Beverly Sills
MastersoftheOpera 1 year ago
Nobody surpasses her in this aria! It is really more than a human heart can support in this life!
dougebraga 2 years ago
Miss Sills is not only a voice (here) "she" is an "anima" ! She is also an instrument of the orchestra...To me , she has been definetly the ONLY one who undestound all what Callas brought to the operatic world
motardbear15 2 years ago 2
I absolutely adore Beverly Sills in this opera, in this role, she is a senstive and sublime singer.. I miss her.
kgarmaker123 2 years ago 7
indeed sublime
LohengrinT 2 years ago
Oh dear..I cannot hear Sills in that aria..She makes me so crying ..It is more that an human heart can support !
motardbear15 2 years ago
Dear Beverly...We are always crying your departure from that earth...You miss us all....Nobody will remplace you ....never...
motardbear15 2 years ago