@fuckutube74 FUCK OFF YOU CUNT. IM TIRED OF ALL YOU CUNTS SAYING THE LANDINGS WERE FAKED. DO SOME RESEARCH. THERE IS UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE OUT THERE THAT MAN HAS WALKED ON THE MOON. FUCK. IM TIRED OF EVERY FUCKING SPACE VIDEO'S COMMENTS BEING LITTERED WITH BULLSHIT ABOUT FAKE MOON LANDINGS. JUST SHHHH.
The second last prime minister is Brian Mulroney, and the small town is Baie-Comeau. The actual crater is Reservoir Manic 5, which is actually the biggest vault damn on earth.
the united states uses the art of war theory for world domination. ask yourself does it make sense to retaliate against people who kill themselves. our leaders such as bush led us to war through the anger, fear, and sadness of the loss of lives in 9/11. its so easy to apply deception through the TV and to unite the citizens to go to war. a useless war at that which only has only made more people want to kill us. its all about world power
To be fair, a lot of technologies invented for the military is sometimes employed for civilian use. NASAs only hope is that the ISS brings some really good results with science experiments, especially with medicine. Personally I'd rather see 1 Trillion go to our defense rather than see 1 trillion to see if some distant plant has water or not. Which one do you think affects me more? Little green men? Or terrorists? By the way I'm a liberal. Big shock.
Yes but the purpose of the exploration seems redundant. If we detect some artificial signal from 4,000 light years away, what hopes do we have of making actual contact with it? And how does that fact help us in any way. Instead wasting tax dollars on searching for the unreachable, why not perfect optics for global surveying, topography and defense network? How about spending money satellites that can provide faster connections?
@twdarkflame And why would it only have to affect the lives of the descendants, and not also those of now? Science is happening now, and affecting things now.
$13 million *per hour* spent on foreign oil by the US each month.
Science and research, space and elsewhere, is what will make everything else cheaper in the long run.
Healthcare, transport and every other aspect of our lives. Thats the biggest argument for exploring the unknown. Not that other things are more expensive, but rather then it will make those things cheaper.
@Anubis0991 Well, the most reasonable thing to do would be to dismantle the military and pour money into healthcare, science and space-exploration instead. I mean, we're not neanderthals anymore?
@Anubis0991 those numbers are a little off, but yeah, NASA's budget is tiny and shrinking while the defense budget is massive. Health care's a messy issue, though.
@RTRVII blame this generation's youth and adults alike for spending money in garbage lifestyle and to the constant war with talibans etc which both factions are at blame
Lol, an Ovum in a women's womb look's exactly the same from a fibre optic microscope vid if you slow it down to 1/6th too! NASA's fucking about with reversed persepective imagry, that's why the answer was only the Human Civilization, not everything else that's upon Earth, because it's a fucking Ovum on this vid that only produce's Human's, DUH! No wonder you lost you're Green Man!
Great another one of you guys. You're acting as if all the money on this planet is only given to NASA and nothing else. Yeah as if no one else is doing all that stuff....
That sure is an easy statement to say,with no evidence to back it up. Do you think everything is alright on Earth? Do you see any benefits of spending zillions in space,so you can be amused? Come down to Earth,& get clue on life & reality friend.
Are you really that stupid? Space research is the only way to avoid our inevitable end. Do some research on what happened on Earth 65 million years ago you douche bag. Any research that expands our understanding of Space is a step in the direction of SURVIVAL. Think outside the SMALL problems on our SMALL planet.
Oh my,you are so out of the picture. Our inevitable end,is a joke in the first place. It will be helped by what,more satellites in space? The small problems,these are the Big,& only problems.are you so naive? Are there problems in space that we should address with our billions of dollars? Not at all,all the issues are down here. are we could keep watching space footage...FOR WHAT GOOD YOU MORON!
@sloofuss "It will be helped by what,more satellites in space?"
Yes, if those satellites increase our understanding of the universe.
Space exploration is very VERY hard. And Earth has only been suitable for humans for a tiny timescale. Without space research we wont be here in the future either.
Its that simple. Resources running out, Asteroids, Gamma Ray bursts....all manner of dangers are up there.
People need to realize that at some point in the future of human kind, we will undoubtedly have to migrate to other host planets or moons. There is no escaping it... call it SciFi if you want... but it's the inevitable future. Space exploration should ALWAYS be in progress. The only excuse for cutting space exploration is the downfall of society.
@sloofuss Read something. Theres no denying that the sun will burn out eventually so that makes space exploration kind of important in long-term survival.
@sloofuss Why do you think it's all just for "amusement"? And if we were to take zillions that are spent on war and destruction and spend them in space, that would be a step toward solving problems on Earth. It's not either/or. One doesn't have to stop one to do the other.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No ,what I'm wondering is ,why any money at all is being sent to shoot men to the moon. WHAT GOOD IS COMING OF IT<WHEN EVERYTHING IS FUCKED UP HERE? Just answer that plain and simply. THANKS1
Well, going to the moon is a big challenge, and big challenges can give a boost to technology. There had been technological advances during the Apollo missions. Medical research can also be done on the Moon that can one day benefit those here on Earth. It is also good for business. The gas source found on the moon's surface could hold the key to meeting future energy demands. It can also be a one stop for those going beyond the Moon. We will have functional bases on the moon by 2034.
You are very funny! That was hilarious! LOl You totally get it. Maybe some day the government will come to its senses and stop wasting billions on this useless shit..
How is it useless? I'm not disagreeing with you..however, it is only another example of man's curiosity, and that is very healthy...the day we stop dreaming and wondering what is out there, that is the day we die.
@StarshipPoopers1 space is full of sunshine, space, dirt & water. To make the biggest, most beautiful garden I ever saw, all we need to take along is seeds and knowhow. Here's to the day our umpty great grandchildren climb low-gravity oaks together.
ha stop the wars? you should see how much the US spends anualy in their military buget: $ 1 trillion - a trillion bucks a year on war preperations (US & UK are the countries that are considered the most beligerent), can you believe that, it doesn't matter how much you try to change the world, 2000 years of human civilization nothing has changed we are the same, we still keep killing ourselfs, the problem is the system & human nature..
On Apollo 17 the last Moon Mission, there was a timed camera what was controled by Mission Control to at the exact time of launch from the moon to tilt up at a angle and zoom out
Damn.. I've always wanted to go see Aurora Borealis.. but then these guys get to see if from space! Just wow, I've never been jealous in my whole life except of astronauts because their work (although serious and demanding), what they get to achieve and experience is beyond a dream come true.
Space is the only thing that makes me want to believe in reincarnation so that one day I get to experience it myself (that and I like to think I've lived in better times than all the problems nowadays).
Actually. The Universe is ever expanding. Which means it's expanding into space that it previously did not occupy. Which would indicate that it does have an end. Current theories state- Imagine the universe as a bubble, getting bigger and bigger. There is likely more than one bubble... or universe... indicating a multiverse.
Well... we can't really prove what is "way out there", but there is proof that the Universe is expanding in all directions. And if the Universe is expanding, it has to be expanding into something (if the universe was infinite, it would be incapable of expanding). That, in itself, is proof enough for me. Think about it, with the size of the Universe... is it really that hard to believe that there is more than one dimension/universe??
Calosity, i think you're speaking of the red shift phenomenon. To me there is not definitive proof that the universe is ever-expanding. What the red shift interprets is galaxies moving further away from us. If the universe was already infinite and the forces acting on large bodies like galaxies were constant than it would seem plausible that the movement of these large bodies isn't proof of expansion of the universe but rather proof that large bodies of galaxies are moving away from each other.
I think you're talking about the Doppler redshift.
and that is a way of being able to tell if an object is moving toward/away from you. If its moving away, it's a redshift. If it's moving toward you, it's a blueshift. However, that is only how you can tell what an object is doing via its electromagnetic waves. Dark Matter makes up for the majority of visible space, and the expansion of this dark matter, in every direction, implies that the universe is expanding.
The problem with baryonic dark matter theory is that it's undetectable and only inferred by it's effect on galaxies and gaseous structures in space. There isn't definitive proof that it exists and speculation that the majority of "visible" is contained by an invisible matter seems like a hoax at best. Perhaps it is true and our technology can't pick up this "dim" matter that is irradiated but until this matter appears in an accelerator experiment I will remain skeptical as to it's existence.
Well, it's always best to remain skeptical. I have to admit that.. when it comes down to it... we really don't know much at all as to the origins of our Universe.
I guess I just personally believe that there is far more out there than we think... We call it the 'Universe', because we think it is the only one.
Your absolutely in the right to remain skeptical, and I actually commend you for it. Question everything. It's nice commenting with someone who seems to know what they are talking about.
Le MusiqueduHouse, I didn't get if you're confusing two distinct phenomena. One is Doppler Effect, which, as you said, provokes Redshift or Blushift. But "cosmic" Redshift is a different thing. It makes wavelenghts straigthen because every cubic inch of the Universe is expanding, not because there's a relative movement between source of light and observer
Were you born backwards and blue? I can't help but wonder if you were the result of a failed creampie video You're one of the most deluded people I've ever seen.
I just realized you have "moon landing hoax" as one of your favorites. If you honestly think it was a hoax, you're worse off than I thought. You're 19 and think you know everything? Answer me this, then. Why would Russia (who completely hated us) not disprove our landing? Why wouldn't some 500,000 NASA employees come forward saying we faked it? And lastly, why would we fake it NINE times?
it's easier to actually land, than it is to fake it.
Well there is one true point you're coming from and that is that there's plenty about the universe we do not know but 90% is a horrible exaggeration. While most starts with speculation, assumptions, and hypothesis's... there has been many studies so far proven true.
yes, moron. science IS speculation. you have a theory, you form a hypothesis, you run experiments, you test said experiments, and eventually, it becomes a science. are you so dense that this is beyond your grasp?
and "U" is not just an abbreviation, but it's also a display of laziness, incompetence ot stupidity. you saved what, .00000003 seconds to shorten a three letter word? wow. you're so awesome.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you spelled "or" wrong. you spelled it "ot" ..i will now go on to question your level of intelligence based off a simple typographical error, which is not unlike an abbreviation in that you were obviously in a hurry and instead of spending what, 12 seconds to proof read what you typed, you just clicked "Post Comment." You can hypothesize all day long about how "OR" COULD be spelled using only the letters "O" and "T" but it still wont be science. the rest of us will just call you an asshole.
hahahah but the thing is, if you think that using abbreviated type is directly related to a lack of education, I think it's saying a little something about yourself. Maybe you're a little insecure ... either way it isn't my problem. just relax a little and don't be so quick to call someone out. was it really worth it? you've made yourself look bad enough by even mentioning the whole "using U" thing, and you pounced at the opportunity to make yourself seem smarter... over an abbreviation! lmao
@JephN Why should one go and take "pride" in education? If by that you mean "feel superior to your fellow human beings who didn't get it" or some such selfish world-damaging crap like that.
Science has still proven more into existence than any religion you can name. Are you saying that magma is some sort of phenomena of Earth's shit. Tell me, what defines a gas and solid. It's more like 90% proven assumptions, in which case while relativity is open for disapproval; nothing yet has disproved it.
you used the letter U to replace a word and you call me ignorant?
Science tests theories and hypotheses to ultimately prove them as law or fact. you makes an educated or informed guess, and test hundreds of times. If the results are the same, it is fact. This is the fundamental base of science, you incompetent cretin. Now run along, I hear L. Ron Hubbard calling you.
That's a pretty ignorant statement. We don't know, but we can make a well informed and/or educated guess at most of the things we're learning. That's exactly what science is, by definition.
That crater is amazing. I flew over it on the way back home from Europe, I was like? WTF is that? A gigantic perfectly circular lake? I was even more amazed to find out it was an impact crater later.
In response to eagyl's response - who said anything about free speech?
Don't bleat about free speech when someone challenges your position!
If you want to know "how God created this world", then, IMHO, you'd be better off listening to the people who spend their lives examining it scientifically. I guess that's too much like hard work, huh? Takes the mystery out of things? OK - you go back to your "mysterical crap" (to use your - er - phrase).
In response to padster123 wo forgot free speech! I want to know how God created this world. I am not intereted in this or that phenomenon, in the soectrun of thisor that element. I want to know his thoughts; the rest are details. Albert Einstein p.s. Yes, I'm proud enough not to be you!
ok I agree you don't need God to explain the aurora borealis. even I, as a Christian, know that. the world's not 6000 years old either. God and science aren't mutually exclusive belief/knowledge systems.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There is science, there is the creator. The points do get boring. It scientifically takes all the mystery out of life. Not for me! The most beautiful thin we can experience is the mysterious. said by albert! Thanks for your scientific crap anyway. Not that it is wasted. I'm much into exploration. but this is too much non- mysterical crap!
it'll take them a while to get your meaning, but i understand your point of view, and though i'm not religious, i agree that the most beautiful things are the most mysterious
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Thanks someone understands me. Im not saying that religion disproves the scientific explanation, but the explanation makes power of God or Higher being that more magnificent. Thats all Im sayin.
Okay guys, how about dispensing with the primitive polarizing argument between science and religion, and simply sit back, relax, and enjoy this fine footage of the Northern Lights display, seen from the space station.
Every now and then we have this kind of activity here in Montana and it's an amazing sight to see and perhaps get some photo or video footage of and it's even more fabulous when viewed from space.
Very nice footage of the display and I'm adding this to my favorites.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
actually it has quite alot to do with a higher power. I t is quite amazing that simple radiation could cause such a showcase. I wonder what could be the root reason i mean the noddy griddy reason for such a magnificent display you atheist pig.
There is no higher power controlling the aurora borealis you ignorant monkey. Yea god is up there sprinkiling pixie dust into our atmosphere so we can look up and be awed at his abilites. what a damn fool you are. Go educate yourself before making an ass out of yourself. The noddy griddy reason is simple...the sun shoots out particles that interact with our atmosphere and glow. dummy. call me an atheist pig b/c i don't need god to explain an astronomical phenomenon....
i dont belive in (god) but their is something;what that is ha i dont know but whatever it is it made the rules for UNIVERSE and thats very big last time i checked i know what ur sayn taurus its just most people are idiots ,dont know why this is markd spam
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow that is so cool. I really hope i can see it for real one day. After seeing something like that you have got to be convinced that there is some higher power that has total cotrol over the cosmos.
actually no, i'm not conivnced.what the hell does the aurora have to do with a higher power? If you listened to the dude talking you'd know what causes it...and it's not a higher power.
dude, you're an idiot. The aurora occurs at the top of our atmosphere, it can be seen from space just like it can be seen from earth. The aurora is in between them both lol.
you know whats crazy....i live in like southern canada by toronto and ive seen this shit before outside my house, it was like a weird red/orange colour.its pretty unreal to think all this shit we truly know nothing about you know...whos to say we are right in sayin what it is...trippy shit bro
I started this video (haven't even finished watching it) and I saw stars and I immediately predicted that the comments would be full of moon landing hoax assholes going "OMGOMGOMGOMG! LOOK AT TEH STARS! UR ALL SHEEPLE! LOL 9/11 TRUTH TOO!" etc. So I scrolled down and....
OK, I finished the video, it was pretty awesome. One thing I noticed is that they mentioned they had the exposure on the camera adjusted. If the camera was set to be more sensitive to light when these videos were made, it stands to reason stars would be visible.
But hey, I don't know anything, because I'm just a brainwashed New World Order slave. Hail to the Reptilian Brotherhood! ;)
I would be happy to have a debate on this matter with you buzzcut23, even though you seem thick i am sure you could enlighten me as to why i am wrong, LunarTuner tried very well but i am open to hear what you think.
I don't know if the abdominable snowman is real or not but i do know there are ape like creatures that resemble humans, there called buzzcuts :-)
LunarTuner and i were having a debate, he was explaining why he thought i was wrong and i was trying to put my point a view across, that's what youtube is for isn't it?
The only person i annoyed was you, now go and take a sedative and calm down :-) you silly boy
I can point out many factual reasons why you see stars here and not from the surface of the moon.
1. This is taken on the side of the earth in shadow, not in sunlight.
2. Thier intentions were to film Stars and the Aurora so you would set your cameras to do so and film when the earth was in shadow!
3. The same side of the moon always faces the earth, so the surface of the moon the Astronauts were on was always in sunlight with glare from the moon.
Thanks for the response, i do understand what LunarTuner and yourself are saying, it does seem to make sense but on the other hand i somehow still don't feel convinced, please don't take offense.
Have a look at this video > "Earth seen from Apollo 11" when the earth is zoomed out it is so small that one would imagine you would, wether the camera is focused on the earth or not, one would see stars, at least on the periphery of the focus area. Maybe I'm wrong but it does seem a bit odd!
Cloud formations on U.S. weather maps available at the NOAA from the time and date of the Apollo 11 video of Earth, match exactly, the cloud formations seen in the images of earth in the video.
the washout is caused by all the sunlight bouncing off of the moon's surface and into the Apollo 11 cameras. The lighted section of the moon can be quite bright (step outside during a cloudless full moon). Get a very dim light source and set it next to a bright light. Now take out a digital camera that can auto-attune to the lighting, point it at the bright light and see how well you can see the dim one. Same principle applies with the stars and the sun/moonlight.
manwithnobeard, who are these so-called experts. Of course one can see stars! This is shot at NIGHT! Note that the narrator refers to city lights--that would be night. Note that he also says the earth glow is washed out when exposing the image for the stars in the background. Imagine how much more difficult that would have been during daylight. This video proves all the conspiracy theorists???? It only proves that they're not paying attention!
manwithnobeard, from 130,000 km from earth one cannot film stars if one also wants a proper exposure of the earth (to see clouds, oceans, land, etc.). Basically, you must choose 1 or the other. You might get closer if you wanted an exposure of the dark side of the earth (city lights, moonlight, etc.). That's the deal. Ask your local pro photographer. Don't take my word for it.
manwithnobeard, like many other photographers around the world (who also believe like me that the earth is not flat), I have photographed both the earth and stars. On an average partly cloudy day, an earth landscape can be shot at about 1/125th at about f8 - f16 (or so). On a clear night, an average star is about 18 seconds at f 4.5. That's over 2,000 times less bright. I can shoot either, but I can't shoot them both at the same time unless I want to sacrifice one or the other. Ask around.
Hopefully you can connect that our atmosphere is going to let in a lot of foreign objects without it destroying, things like radiation and uv rays and heat, and all that other foreign junk that couldnt get it when it could.Nothing can survive, exept maybe roaches, or weird germs we dont know of.
The earth will boil up becasue it has to.Fact is we have a core made by flowing magma.The magma has two temperatures that shift becuase of a difference in temperature.Over a LONG period of time wich in astronomical reality is a short time.So that means that where the atmosphere is strong it will be weak, and where its weak, it will be strong.During that transition there will be holes and gaps due to the temporary inbalances in the core.Our earth is going to have north south and south north.
how is it that people can turn a really cool video about electromagnetic activity into an argument about religion and politics? geez.
ER160990C 4 months ago
This is the same guy who explained how to drink coffee from a cup in space...
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
Humanity can barely understand and accept eachother's religions... what makes them think that space will be the answer?
toledosan 6 months ago
@TheRikRoll no sense
Alberthcore 9 months ago
@TheRikRoll im not talking idiot, im from us idiot, idiot idiot hahahaha
Alberthcore 9 months ago
Fake
Alberthcore 9 months ago
@Alberthcore......3 words GET A LIFE
LoLimrandom123 8 months ago
@LoLimrandom123 2 words for you too, Fuck You
Alberthcore 8 months ago
@Alberthcore yea i have another 2 words for you.....DICK HEAD
LoLimrandom123 8 months ago
@LoLimrandom123 oooh you really want me to have a dick head right? hahaha fucking gay
im sorry i like women
Alberthcore 8 months ago
@Alberthcore I'am a girl tho
LoLimrandom123 8 months ago
@LoLimrandom123 lol i was fighting with other guy in other video, i get confused with the answers
Alberthcore 8 months ago
@Alberthcore ok :/
LoLimrandom123 8 months ago
@seriouslyboredguy yeah i constantly think of a world with (and this will NEVER happen) a common interest of space exploration.
that would mke more fnds, more technology at ones disposal, etc. wed probably have a moon colony by now if more people wanted to see space
MetalMonarchy 9 months ago
Everyone who is against NASA funding needs to do a little research. There are too many technological advances to count due to NASA!
dexodrine 10 months ago
Its earth who eats spacestuff ?
ChrisAcintya 10 months ago
Nasa is Dying
Brian Oleary the astronaut scientist doubts men were ever on the moon
Nasa Fake Everything
fuckutube74 11 months ago
@fuckutube74 FUCK OFF YOU CUNT. IM TIRED OF ALL YOU CUNTS SAYING THE LANDINGS WERE FAKED. DO SOME RESEARCH. THERE IS UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE OUT THERE THAT MAN HAS WALKED ON THE MOON. FUCK. IM TIRED OF EVERY FUCKING SPACE VIDEO'S COMMENTS BEING LITTERED WITH BULLSHIT ABOUT FAKE MOON LANDINGS. JUST SHHHH.
amor987654321 9 months ago
To much to handle......WOW.
scottnight 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor then
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it's probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
lavernedi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The big Oil corporations are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating ur own electricity now.
Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!
slipshodcoqbgg 1 year ago
this video is excellent. so musch to see at one time. i bet you the camera dos't do this justice seeing it from space must be cool. my job sucks.lol
BBT1099 1 year ago
Kind of... Just kind of.. reminds me of you know what.
AnickAckhavong 1 year ago
The second last prime minister is Brian Mulroney, and the small town is Baie-Comeau. The actual crater is Reservoir Manic 5, which is actually the biggest vault damn on earth.
kliqua 1 year ago
the united states uses the art of war theory for world domination. ask yourself does it make sense to retaliate against people who kill themselves. our leaders such as bush led us to war through the anger, fear, and sadness of the loss of lives in 9/11. its so easy to apply deception through the TV and to unite the citizens to go to war. a useless war at that which only has only made more people want to kill us. its all about world power
pawnsofamerica 2 years ago 2
arms the future name " HAARP" 10;00
palmaAK47 2 years ago
Afganic?
Seriously?
kroberts9884 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Actually the shuttle is a waste of time and money. ETs are here but I guess NASA wants to keep their jobs
MegaFred55 2 years ago
NASA 2009 budget --- $ 17.6 billion
U.S Military budget ---- about $1 trillion
U.S healthcare budget ---- 2.2 trillion & rising
judge for yourself......
Anubis0991 2 years ago 49
9/11 2001 Inside job
IRAQ AFGANIC WAR
1,05 Trillion
waste of fucking time money power and respect
sonicM 2 years ago
thats ur taxdollars at work right thur <:3
TTCHypnotist 2 years ago
To be fair, a lot of technologies invented for the military is sometimes employed for civilian use. NASAs only hope is that the ISS brings some really good results with science experiments, especially with medicine. Personally I'd rather see 1 Trillion go to our defense rather than see 1 trillion to see if some distant plant has water or not. Which one do you think affects me more? Little green men? Or terrorists? By the way I'm a liberal. Big shock.
KDALove 2 years ago
@KDALove- Its not about effecting your life, its about effecting your childrens lifes.
Your life has been effected by space tech made by the previous generations. Satellites being the most obvious.
Give your descendants, and those of the rest of us a chance of flourish. support the future, not the fears of the present.
Exploration and science has more then proved itself historically as being worth it.
twdarkflame 2 years ago
Yes but the purpose of the exploration seems redundant. If we detect some artificial signal from 4,000 light years away, what hopes do we have of making actual contact with it? And how does that fact help us in any way. Instead wasting tax dollars on searching for the unreachable, why not perfect optics for global surveying, topography and defense network? How about spending money satellites that can provide faster connections?
KDALove 2 years ago
@KDALove How's that the limit of exploration, just finding signals from some place that can't be responded to?
mike4ty4 1 year ago
@twdarkflame And why would it only have to affect the lives of the descendants, and not also those of now? Science is happening now, and affecting things now.
mike4ty4 1 year ago
@Anubis0991 you forgot to include the
$13 million *per hour* spent on foreign oil by the US each month.
Science and research, space and elsewhere, is what will make everything else cheaper in the long run.
Healthcare, transport and every other aspect of our lives. Thats the biggest argument for exploring the unknown. Not that other things are more expensive, but rather then it will make those things cheaper.
twdarkflame 2 years ago
I agree.. put more into NASA and less into military... the pictures and video are sooo worth it.
KevinCanada87 2 years ago
@Anubis0991
Healthcare budget should be lower than NASA?
yesledman2 1 year ago
@Anubis0991 Well, the most reasonable thing to do would be to dismantle the military and pour money into healthcare, science and space-exploration instead. I mean, we're not neanderthals anymore?
winterstellar 1 year ago
@Anubis0991 those numbers are a little off, but yeah, NASA's budget is tiny and shrinking while the defense budget is massive. Health care's a messy issue, though.
ROFLCOPTERsoysoysoy 9 months ago
@Anubis0991 such a shame to cut on the nasa fundings... :( :(
RTRVII 8 months ago
@RTRVII blame this generation's youth and adults alike for spending money in garbage lifestyle and to the constant war with talibans etc which both factions are at blame
anonymous133711 7 months ago
@Anubis0991 putting an aurora on your sandwich - priceless
RubberToadstools 2 months ago
@Anubis0991 national debt... 15 trillion and rising... lol were fucked.
m0t0cr0ss17 2 months ago
Lol, an Ovum in a women's womb look's exactly the same from a fibre optic microscope vid if you slow it down to 1/6th too! NASA's fucking about with reversed persepective imagry, that's why the answer was only the Human Civilization, not everything else that's upon Earth, because it's a fucking Ovum on this vid that only produce's Human's, DUH! No wonder you lost you're Green Man!
KaOssis 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Man all of this space bullshit!~ Here is an idea feed the homeless. Help our children get some health care.
Stop the wars! Put teachers back to work. NAh fuck it,let's fly to the moon in search of...
sloofuss 2 years ago
Great another one of you guys. You're acting as if all the money on this planet is only given to NASA and nothing else. Yeah as if no one else is doing all that stuff....
dinmagic 2 years ago 2
No,just wondering why we are spending even $1.00 now for space exploration/?I think space has reached it's limit.
for now,we need to help fucked up earth situations.
sloofuss 2 years ago
Well we can't all just focus on one thing can we?
dinmagic 2 years ago
you're a small minded moron.
jonzoid99 2 years ago
That sure is an easy statement to say,with no evidence to back it up. Do you think everything is alright on Earth? Do you see any benefits of spending zillions in space,so you can be amused? Come down to Earth,& get clue on life & reality friend.
sloofuss 2 years ago
Are you really that stupid? Space research is the only way to avoid our inevitable end. Do some research on what happened on Earth 65 million years ago you douche bag. Any research that expands our understanding of Space is a step in the direction of SURVIVAL. Think outside the SMALL problems on our SMALL planet.
jonzoid99 2 years ago
Oh my,you are so out of the picture. Our inevitable end,is a joke in the first place. It will be helped by what,more satellites in space? The small problems,these are the Big,& only problems.are you so naive? Are there problems in space that we should address with our billions of dollars? Not at all,all the issues are down here. are we could keep watching space footage...FOR WHAT GOOD YOU MORON!
sloofuss 2 years ago
@sloofuss "It will be helped by what,more satellites in space?"
Yes, if those satellites increase our understanding of the universe.
Space exploration is very VERY hard. And Earth has only been suitable for humans for a tiny timescale. Without space research we wont be here in the future either.
Its that simple. Resources running out, Asteroids, Gamma Ray bursts....all manner of dangers are up there.
And we cant deal with them. Not yet.
And thats why we need to progress.
twdarkflame 1 year ago
Agree 100%!!!
People need to realize that at some point in the future of human kind, we will undoubtedly have to migrate to other host planets or moons. There is no escaping it... call it SciFi if you want... but it's the inevitable future. Space exploration should ALWAYS be in progress. The only excuse for cutting space exploration is the downfall of society.
calosity 1 year ago
@calosity it is predicted that in the next 50 years we will live on other planets such as mars shows signs of life up at its pole under the ice
hottfuzz2 1 year ago
@hottfuzz2 It is also predicted that in the next 50 years we will have the Technological Singularity... you never know what will happen.
almostLiterate 1 year ago
@hottfuzz2 Not so sure 50 years is a reasonable expectation, but I definitely believe we'll be living on other planets or moons sometime soon!
tokillamurderer 8 months ago
@sloofuss Read something. Theres no denying that the sun will burn out eventually so that makes space exploration kind of important in long-term survival.
SuperBluehacker 1 year ago
@sloofuss Why do you think it's all just for "amusement"? And if we were to take zillions that are spent on war and destruction and spend them in space, that would be a step toward solving problems on Earth. It's not either/or. One doesn't have to stop one to do the other.
mike4ty4 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No ,what I'm wondering is ,why any money at all is being sent to shoot men to the moon. WHAT GOOD IS COMING OF IT<WHEN EVERYTHING IS FUCKED UP HERE? Just answer that plain and simply. THANKS1
sloofuss 2 years ago
Well, going to the moon is a big challenge, and big challenges can give a boost to technology. There had been technological advances during the Apollo missions. Medical research can also be done on the Moon that can one day benefit those here on Earth. It is also good for business. The gas source found on the moon's surface could hold the key to meeting future energy demands. It can also be a one stop for those going beyond the Moon. We will have functional bases on the moon by 2034.
dinmagic 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We already have functioning bases on mars, with many thousands of people in them.
themandude20 2 years ago
Besides, it is better to spend that sum of money on space research rather than weapons research.
romanianb1 2 years ago 8
I apologize if I sounded rude in my previous comments.
dinmagic 2 years ago
Well, most of the technilogical advances we have today are because of the space exploration
Jontheking100 2 years ago
Because space is the future of mankind. Once we are a truly space-faring race our survival is essentially guaranteed.
StarshipPoopers1 2 years ago 41
You are very funny! That was hilarious! LOl You totally get it. Maybe some day the government will come to its senses and stop wasting billions on this useless shit..
sloofuss 2 years ago
How is it useless? I'm not disagreeing with you..however, it is only another example of man's curiosity, and that is very healthy...the day we stop dreaming and wondering what is out there, that is the day we die.
jlebesis 2 years ago 3
@StarshipPoopers1 Untill the Borg find us.
aneeko 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@StarshipPoopers1 Untill the Borg find us.
aneeko 1 year ago
@StarshipPoopers1 space is full of sunshine, space, dirt & water. To make the biggest, most beautiful garden I ever saw, all we need to take along is seeds and knowhow. Here's to the day our umpty great grandchildren climb low-gravity oaks together.
cinnamonbrandylite 2 months ago
@StarshipPoopers1 Not if the Reapers want to visit us lol
GAM3HAZARD 2 weeks ago
ha stop the wars? you should see how much the US spends anualy in their military buget: $ 1 trillion - a trillion bucks a year on war preperations (US & UK are the countries that are considered the most beligerent), can you believe that, it doesn't matter how much you try to change the world, 2000 years of human civilization nothing has changed we are the same, we still keep killing ourselfs, the problem is the system & human nature..
Anubis0991 2 years ago
"2000 years of human civilization" LOL
firakid 2 years ago 2
LOL why did i put that xD? about 102.000 years ago more or less
hey, to err is human LOL
Anubis0991 2 years ago
On Apollo 17 the last Moon Mission, there was a timed camera what was controled by Mission Control to at the exact time of launch from the moon to tilt up at a angle and zoom out
Dark3ndWarrior 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who tilted the camera up to follow the blast off from the moon surface on the Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969 ?
aeroclips 2 years ago
*facepalm
They sent fucking people to the moon yet its beyond human capabilities to make a camera track an object.....
02matada 2 years ago
I've never seen such video from Apollo 11. Can't find it anywhere, you must be confusing it with a later mission.
mycourtesyflush 2 years ago
what i would give to see that
fagie1980 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Ciao a tutti,
giocate a calcio o conoscete ragazzi di talento?
Da oggi c'è un nuovo sito per farsi scoprire da osservatori e talent scout: KICKO la piattaforma video per giovani calciatori.
Con KICKO puoi caricare i tuoi video ed essere visto, selezionato, opzionato e contattato dai grandi club di tutto il mondo.
KICKO
zhezha 2 years ago
The universe is so great, i wanna learn all about it its so ... amazing to me its more Amazing then A God or anything like that.
yakomuto 2 years ago 4
If a god existed and he created all, including the universe.. Wouldnt he/she be more amazing?
weeruz 2 years ago
if so then i think that it's only logical
scottysavlette 2 years ago
How do you know he/she isn't?
eltoroloco28 2 years ago
Listen to 'Astronomy cast' pocast on itunes or the net, its free and I learned alot from them about the universe.
fagie1980 2 years ago
Thanks I'll listen to that.
yakomuto 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hyuhjudtuhjyidhyujy7uiyuiyujki
Mark This as a spam :p
noname123ish 2 years ago
Damn.. I've always wanted to go see Aurora Borealis.. but then these guys get to see if from space! Just wow, I've never been jealous in my whole life except of astronauts because their work (although serious and demanding), what they get to achieve and experience is beyond a dream come true.
Space is the only thing that makes me want to believe in reincarnation so that one day I get to experience it myself (that and I like to think I've lived in better times than all the problems nowadays).
CrizzyD 2 years ago 2
By the way there is no such thing as the middle of the universe. It goes on forever, space is like time, it never ends.
15wildman 2 years ago
Actually. The Universe is ever expanding. Which means it's expanding into space that it previously did not occupy. Which would indicate that it does have an end. Current theories state- Imagine the universe as a bubble, getting bigger and bigger. There is likely more than one bubble... or universe... indicating a multiverse.
calosity 2 years ago
but how can we prove this.. we dont know what is "way out" there.
15wildman 2 years ago
Well... we can't really prove what is "way out there", but there is proof that the Universe is expanding in all directions. And if the Universe is expanding, it has to be expanding into something (if the universe was infinite, it would be incapable of expanding). That, in itself, is proof enough for me. Think about it, with the size of the Universe... is it really that hard to believe that there is more than one dimension/universe??
calosity 2 years ago
Calosity, i think you're speaking of the red shift phenomenon. To me there is not definitive proof that the universe is ever-expanding. What the red shift interprets is galaxies moving further away from us. If the universe was already infinite and the forces acting on large bodies like galaxies were constant than it would seem plausible that the movement of these large bodies isn't proof of expansion of the universe but rather proof that large bodies of galaxies are moving away from each other.
LeMusiqueduHouse 2 years ago
I think you're talking about the Doppler redshift.
and that is a way of being able to tell if an object is moving toward/away from you. If its moving away, it's a redshift. If it's moving toward you, it's a blueshift. However, that is only how you can tell what an object is doing via its electromagnetic waves. Dark Matter makes up for the majority of visible space, and the expansion of this dark matter, in every direction, implies that the universe is expanding.
calosity 2 years ago
The problem with baryonic dark matter theory is that it's undetectable and only inferred by it's effect on galaxies and gaseous structures in space. There isn't definitive proof that it exists and speculation that the majority of "visible" is contained by an invisible matter seems like a hoax at best. Perhaps it is true and our technology can't pick up this "dim" matter that is irradiated but until this matter appears in an accelerator experiment I will remain skeptical as to it's existence.
LeMusiqueduHouse 2 years ago
Well, it's always best to remain skeptical. I have to admit that.. when it comes down to it... we really don't know much at all as to the origins of our Universe.
I guess I just personally believe that there is far more out there than we think... We call it the 'Universe', because we think it is the only one.
Your absolutely in the right to remain skeptical, and I actually commend you for it. Question everything. It's nice commenting with someone who seems to know what they are talking about.
calosity 2 years ago
Le MusiqueduHouse, I didn't get if you're confusing two distinct phenomena. One is Doppler Effect, which, as you said, provokes Redshift or Blushift. But "cosmic" Redshift is a different thing. It makes wavelenghts straigthen because every cubic inch of the Universe is expanding, not because there's a relative movement between source of light and observer
sym667 2 years ago
6 times landing, 3 times flying past.
Were you born backwards and blue? I can't help but wonder if you were the result of a failed creampie video You're one of the most deluded people I've ever seen.
I'm done interacting with such a stupid person.
JephN 2 years ago 4
I just realized you have "moon landing hoax" as one of your favorites. If you honestly think it was a hoax, you're worse off than I thought. You're 19 and think you know everything? Answer me this, then. Why would Russia (who completely hated us) not disprove our landing? Why wouldn't some 500,000 NASA employees come forward saying we faked it? And lastly, why would we fake it NINE times?
it's easier to actually land, than it is to fake it.
JephN 2 years ago 4
Well there is one true point you're coming from and that is that there's plenty about the universe we do not know but 90% is a horrible exaggeration. While most starts with speculation, assumptions, and hypothesis's... there has been many studies so far proven true.
FatalFist 2 years ago
yes, moron. science IS speculation. you have a theory, you form a hypothesis, you run experiments, you test said experiments, and eventually, it becomes a science. are you so dense that this is beyond your grasp?
and "U" is not just an abbreviation, but it's also a display of laziness, incompetence ot stupidity. you saved what, .00000003 seconds to shorten a three letter word? wow. you're so awesome.
JephN 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you spelled "or" wrong. you spelled it "ot" ..i will now go on to question your level of intelligence based off a simple typographical error, which is not unlike an abbreviation in that you were obviously in a hurry and instead of spending what, 12 seconds to proof read what you typed, you just clicked "Post Comment." You can hypothesize all day long about how "OR" COULD be spelled using only the letters "O" and "T" but it still wont be science. the rest of us will just call you an asshole.
claytonb010 2 years ago
You call me an asshole as though I should be insulted? A typo is a mistake. I'll be sure to dust the monitor more often.
Willfully shortening a word just to save .0000003 seconds is a bit useless and pointless, and typically, it shows a lack of pride in one's education.
JephN 2 years ago 5
hahahah but the thing is, if you think that using abbreviated type is directly related to a lack of education, I think it's saying a little something about yourself. Maybe you're a little insecure ... either way it isn't my problem. just relax a little and don't be so quick to call someone out. was it really worth it? you've made yourself look bad enough by even mentioning the whole "using U" thing, and you pounced at the opportunity to make yourself seem smarter... over an abbreviation! lmao
claytonb010 2 years ago
@JephN Why should one go and take "pride" in education? If by that you mean "feel superior to your fellow human beings who didn't get it" or some such selfish world-damaging crap like that.
mike4ty4 1 year ago
Science has still proven more into existence than any religion you can name. Are you saying that magma is some sort of phenomena of Earth's shit. Tell me, what defines a gas and solid. It's more like 90% proven assumptions, in which case while relativity is open for disapproval; nothing yet has disproved it.
FatalFist 2 years ago
you used the letter U to replace a word and you call me ignorant?
Science tests theories and hypotheses to ultimately prove them as law or fact. you makes an educated or informed guess, and test hundreds of times. If the results are the same, it is fact. This is the fundamental base of science, you incompetent cretin. Now run along, I hear L. Ron Hubbard calling you.
JephN 2 years ago
That's a pretty ignorant statement. We don't know, but we can make a well informed and/or educated guess at most of the things we're learning. That's exactly what science is, by definition.
JephN 2 years ago
And if you can prove that the 90% of the information is made up, I might actually respect you.
JephN 2 years ago
I agree. Shit is open for interpretation but I can already name things science has proven to exist: atoms, gravity, the process of an Aura boraelis
FatalFist 2 years ago
I might as well be.
JephN 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Perchè non visitate e caricate i vostri video anche sul sito KICKO ? KICKO è lo youtube del calcio ;)
GabrielTalentScout 2 years ago
1. Cover your mouth with you hand
2. Make a wish
3.Close your hand (fist)
4. Hold you hand at heart for 5 seconds
5. Send this to 3 more videos
6. Tommorrow will be the best day ever
Zarrus 2 years ago
DON PETTIT IS THE MAN.
boostwrx 2 years ago
is the Manicouagan Reservoir...amazing view, earth is beautiful.
CamiloSanchez1979 2 years ago
People need to relax a lil more. Don't belive me? Are you mad? -_o, point proven...?
:]
DemonicsWAJM 2 years ago
That crater is amazing. I flew over it on the way back home from Europe, I was like? WTF is that? A gigantic perfectly circular lake? I was even more amazed to find out it was an impact crater later.
maestro4202 3 years ago
In response to eagyl's response - who said anything about free speech?
Don't bleat about free speech when someone challenges your position!
If you want to know "how God created this world", then, IMHO, you'd be better off listening to the people who spend their lives examining it scientifically. I guess that's too much like hard work, huh? Takes the mystery out of things? OK - you go back to your "mysterical crap" (to use your - er - phrase).
padster123 3 years ago
In response to padster123 wo forgot free speech! I want to know how God created this world. I am not intereted in this or that phenomenon, in the soectrun of thisor that element. I want to know his thoughts; the rest are details. Albert Einstein p.s. Yes, I'm proud enough not to be you!
eagyl 3 years ago
Albert Einstein wasn't a theist. Stop quote mining.
Vire70 2 years ago
ok I agree you don't need God to explain the aurora borealis. even I, as a Christian, know that. the world's not 6000 years old either. God and science aren't mutually exclusive belief/knowledge systems.
Godweed64 3 years ago
eagyl, you are an idiot. And you seem proud of the fact.
Don't you DARE quote Einstein, you ignoramus.
padster123 3 years ago
lol high five (:
dollerklause 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There is science, there is the creator. The points do get boring. It scientifically takes all the mystery out of life. Not for me! The most beautiful thin we can experience is the mysterious. said by albert! Thanks for your scientific crap anyway. Not that it is wasted. I'm much into exploration. but this is too much non- mysterical crap!
eagyl 3 years ago
it'll take them a while to get your meaning, but i understand your point of view, and though i'm not religious, i agree that the most beautiful things are the most mysterious
Brysaengr 3 years ago
cool but when you see it too long , it will be boring.
novhybrid 3 years ago
Don Pettit rocks
ystar 3 years ago
looks lovely on there.. would love to see this with the naked eye
lilsam1618 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thanks someone understands me. Im not saying that religion disproves the scientific explanation, but the explanation makes power of God or Higher being that more magnificent. Thats all Im sayin.
taurus51491 3 years ago
This is real???!!!
sirenavaradahds 3 years ago
Okay guys, how about dispensing with the primitive polarizing argument between science and religion, and simply sit back, relax, and enjoy this fine footage of the Northern Lights display, seen from the space station.
Every now and then we have this kind of activity here in Montana and it's an amazing sight to see and perhaps get some photo or video footage of and it's even more fabulous when viewed from space.
Very nice footage of the display and I'm adding this to my favorites.
Cheers!
hamilton59840 3 years ago 5
beautiful
saiph84 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
actually it has quite alot to do with a higher power. I t is quite amazing that simple radiation could cause such a showcase. I wonder what could be the root reason i mean the noddy griddy reason for such a magnificent display you atheist pig.
taurus51491 3 years ago
There is no higher power controlling the aurora borealis you ignorant monkey. Yea god is up there sprinkiling pixie dust into our atmosphere so we can look up and be awed at his abilites. what a damn fool you are. Go educate yourself before making an ass out of yourself. The noddy griddy reason is simple...the sun shoots out particles that interact with our atmosphere and glow. dummy. call me an atheist pig b/c i don't need god to explain an astronomical phenomenon....
saiph84 3 years ago
ya but no but ya but no but..
DeepestSleep 3 years ago
i dont belive in (god) but their is something;what that is ha i dont know but whatever it is it made the rules for UNIVERSE and thats very big last time i checked i know what ur sayn taurus its just most people are idiots ,dont know why this is markd spam
damienandmusic 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow that is so cool. I really hope i can see it for real one day. After seeing something like that you have got to be convinced that there is some higher power that has total cotrol over the cosmos.
taurus51491 3 years ago
actually no, i'm not conivnced.what the hell does the aurora have to do with a higher power? If you listened to the dude talking you'd know what causes it...and it's not a higher power.
saiph84 3 years ago 6
Thanks for posting this video!
CimarronMyst 3 years ago
why is the aurora is so beautiful??lol kinda stupid question... i really lik to see aurora ona day
korfkid 3 years ago
i see it
myhamster10 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thats pretty unusual to have a Aurora in Space , they have probably mistaken it for something else because this is practically impossible !
fishandmits 3 years ago
dude, you're an idiot. The aurora occurs at the top of our atmosphere, it can be seen from space just like it can be seen from earth. The aurora is in between them both lol.
batterycharger1 3 years ago
you know whats crazy....i live in like southern canada by toronto and ive seen this shit before outside my house, it was like a weird red/orange colour.its pretty unreal to think all this shit we truly know nothing about you know...whos to say we are right in sayin what it is...trippy shit bro
bequietanddrive1988 3 years ago
this is a truly amazing video footage and very informatitive
dildoenforcer 3 years ago 2
What happens when you go in the aurora?
AncientLiam 3 years ago
You find a bag of golden coins
bolderiks 3 years ago 9
I started this video (haven't even finished watching it) and I saw stars and I immediately predicted that the comments would be full of moon landing hoax assholes going "OMGOMGOMGOMG! LOOK AT TEH STARS! UR ALL SHEEPLE! LOL 9/11 TRUTH TOO!" etc. So I scrolled down and....
Lo and behold! I SEE IGNORANT PEOPLE! :O
thesouthparkguy 3 years ago
OK, I finished the video, it was pretty awesome. One thing I noticed is that they mentioned they had the exposure on the camera adjusted. If the camera was set to be more sensitive to light when these videos were made, it stands to reason stars would be visible.
But hey, I don't know anything, because I'm just a brainwashed New World Order slave. Hail to the Reptilian Brotherhood! ;)
thesouthparkguy 3 years ago
lol. or more appropriately
My God, it's [the internet] is full of idiots.
jbezorg01 3 years ago 2
I would be happy to have a debate on this matter with you buzzcut23, even though you seem thick i am sure you could enlighten me as to why i am wrong, LunarTuner tried very well but i am open to hear what you think.
I don't know if the abdominable snowman is real or not but i do know there are ape like creatures that resemble humans, there called buzzcuts :-)
manwithnobeard 3 years ago
LOL charming!
LunarTuner and i were having a debate, he was explaining why he thought i was wrong and i was trying to put my point a view across, that's what youtube is for isn't it?
The only person i annoyed was you, now go and take a sedative and calm down :-) you silly boy
manwithnobeard 3 years ago
I can point out many factual reasons why you see stars here and not from the surface of the moon.
1. This is taken on the side of the earth in shadow, not in sunlight.
2. Thier intentions were to film Stars and the Aurora so you would set your cameras to do so and film when the earth was in shadow!
3. The same side of the moon always faces the earth, so the surface of the moon the Astronauts were on was always in sunlight with glare from the moon.
quaheedus 3 years ago
Thanks for the response, i do understand what LunarTuner and yourself are saying, it does seem to make sense but on the other hand i somehow still don't feel convinced, please don't take offense.
Have a look at this video > "Earth seen from Apollo 11" when the earth is zoomed out it is so small that one would imagine you would, wether the camera is focused on the earth or not, one would see stars, at least on the periphery of the focus area. Maybe I'm wrong but it does seem a bit odd!
manwithnobeard 3 years ago
Cloud formations on U.S. weather maps available at the NOAA from the time and date of the Apollo 11 video of Earth, match exactly, the cloud formations seen in the images of earth in the video.
quaheedus 3 years ago
the washout is caused by all the sunlight bouncing off of the moon's surface and into the Apollo 11 cameras. The lighted section of the moon can be quite bright (step outside during a cloudless full moon). Get a very dim light source and set it next to a bright light. Now take out a digital camera that can auto-attune to the lighting, point it at the bright light and see how well you can see the dim one. Same principle applies with the stars and the sun/moonlight.
kash1123 3 years ago
Interesting that we can see stars in this video, when every "expert" under the sun claims you can't see stars so close to earth or the moon!
this video proves all the conspiracy theorists correct :-)
The moon landings were fake and so was the Japanese HD view of the moon, which funny enough wasn't HD enough to show any stars!
manwithnobeard 3 years ago
manwithnobeard, who are these so-called experts. Of course one can see stars! This is shot at NIGHT! Note that the narrator refers to city lights--that would be night. Note that he also says the earth glow is washed out when exposing the image for the stars in the background. Imagine how much more difficult that would have been during daylight. This video proves all the conspiracy theorists???? It only proves that they're not paying attention!
LunarTuner 3 years ago
LunarTuner> so your basically saying during the day you wouldn't be able film stars because of the washout?
What about if one was 130,000 K from earth? could you film them then?
manwithnobeard 3 years ago
Like in this video for instance>
watch?v=RCbzQG7U6Hs&feature=related
manwithnobeard 3 years ago
manwithnobeard, from 130,000 km from earth one cannot film stars if one also wants a proper exposure of the earth (to see clouds, oceans, land, etc.). Basically, you must choose 1 or the other. You might get closer if you wanted an exposure of the dark side of the earth (city lights, moonlight, etc.). That's the deal. Ask your local pro photographer. Don't take my word for it.
LunarTuner 3 years ago
"from 130,000 km from earth one cannot film stars if one also wants a proper exposure of the earth"
That's more of an unbelievable statement than proclaiming the earth's flat!
manwithnobeard 3 years ago
manwithnobeard, like many other photographers around the world (who also believe like me that the earth is not flat), I have photographed both the earth and stars. On an average partly cloudy day, an earth landscape can be shot at about 1/125th at about f8 - f16 (or so). On a clear night, an average star is about 18 seconds at f 4.5. That's over 2,000 times less bright. I can shoot either, but I can't shoot them both at the same time unless I want to sacrifice one or the other. Ask around.
LunarTuner 3 years ago
where was that at?
representenhiphop 3 years ago
International Space Center
MounDoGG 3 years ago
space...
KaosFromCoD4 3 years ago 2
hello
scrumpyjackflash 3 years ago
this not chat room lol even what's up?
MounDoGG 3 years ago
you alright mate?
scrumpyjackflash 3 years ago
Hopefully you can connect that our atmosphere is going to let in a lot of foreign objects without it destroying, things like radiation and uv rays and heat, and all that other foreign junk that couldnt get it when it could.Nothing can survive, exept maybe roaches, or weird germs we dont know of.
KennyCastellon 3 years ago
The earth will boil up becasue it has to.Fact is we have a core made by flowing magma.The magma has two temperatures that shift becuase of a difference in temperature.Over a LONG period of time wich in astronomical reality is a short time.So that means that where the atmosphere is strong it will be weak, and where its weak, it will be strong.During that transition there will be holes and gaps due to the temporary inbalances in the core.Our earth is going to have north south and south north.
KennyCastellon 3 years ago