Added: 3 years ago
From: AritHeru23
Views: 34,005
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (558)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i hope this is a troll. so many things wrong with this video.

  • @malcolm2468 No it isn't. Google.....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?

    ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW”

    SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?

    for more

    “Years from now, people will find our acceptance of the HIV theory of AIDS as silly as we find those who excommunicated Galileo.”

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny ok so i watched the video again. i managed to get to 48 seconds. HIV does not cause 30 diseases, and tuberculosis with HIV+ serology is not called AIDS. That's bullshit every 24 seconds on average. And im not sure who you're quoting, but to excommunicate Galileo without evidence and to dismiss HIV causing AIDS when there is overwhelming evidence are very different things.

  • @malcolm2468 Actually yes....TB plus a reaction on Gallo's crap antibody test DOES = "aids" according to the dogma. What "overwhelming evidence"? "Proof" by assertion is not evidence

    "Hiv"? Do you mean the cellular crap Gallo "discovered"? Or do you mean one of those NONspecific reactions on Gallo's UNstandardized antibody test?

    If you want to know where I got the quote google the link.

  • @malcolm2468 Also....watching 48 seconds of an almost 10 minute video does NOT = watching it "again" I suspect you never watched it at all. I suspect you went to some internet drug marketers to find out what "your" opinion of it is.

  • Ken Anderlini, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, Michael Bellefountaine, Sophie Brassard, Ronnie Burk,

    Jerry Colinard, Sylvie Cousseau, Boyd Ed Graves, Mark Griffiths, Robert Johnston, John Kirkham, Kelly Jon Landis, Sandi Lenfestey, Jack Levine, Raphael Lombardo, Peter Mokaba,

    Christine Maggiore, Marietta Ndziba, David Pasquarelli, Casper G. Schmidt, Karri Stokely,

    Tony Tompsett, Huw Christie Williams, Jody Wells, Scott Zanetti. All names of AIDS denialists who have passed away thanks to dicks like this

  • @hitcan79 Lmao.....AGAIN with your Ministry of Aidstruth bullshit list?!?!?!?! AGAIN?

    You sad twat. That list was put together by a bunch of UNqualified internet drug marketers. No autopsies are even provided. Lmao...you're supposed to take the pseudo-scientist drug marketers word for it.

    Why do you go from video to video "forgetting" the exact same thing over and over and over etc? What could possibly motivate someone to be soo "forgetful"?

  • @hitcan79 Google......The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia

    "who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?

    A dozen people who include a graduate student, a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen,Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman) ........So they mostly seem to be a typical bunch of HIV activists who have made AIDS genocide marketing their business

  • @hitcan79 Hey..."forgetful" one....The Ministry of Aidstruth claims that the Dr who did Christine and Ejs autopsies is just a veterinarian. Lol....is that the truth or is it just another drug marketing lie?

    yes...that's right. It's just yet another bald faced lie from the Ministry of Aidstruth

    to see Christine's AUTOPSY google.......Analysis of causes that led to Christine Maggiore’s acute renal and cardiac failure, pulmonary edema, and death

    Mohammed Ali Al-Bayati Ph.D., DABT, DABVT

  • Look at the epi-center. Africa. Pretty easy to understand, no? Lack of food, clean water etc will lead to an immune system collapse. Same with powerful drug users and the same with Gay men that "bare back" and continuously add feces/bacteria to the blood giving and receiving.

    It is a disease, no doubt. But It's not a virus/HIV that causes it.

  • And the today's established scientific community is using the same propaganda methods to fabricate a bogus climate change scare just as the AIDS propagandists did 25 years ago. Dare to challenge the established orothodoxy regarding "man-made global warming" or climate change and you will be permanently excommunicated from the scientific community, have your funding cut off, and made a mockery of in scientific circles. It's the only way when waging a global propaganda war against the unsuspecting

  • Comment removed

  • @thekoolaidImadeforJimJonestas­tedfunny: smeghead! the House of Nimrods is trash

  • Hooray for David Crowe and "rethinkingAIDS". Stop the tests, stop the murder and medical profiling for sheer profit. They killed my friends and had me on the short list to be next.

    Don't believe me but the actual science which the "mainstream" stonewall instead of address. Don't be taken in by the amazing fraud begun by Gallo abetted by (Reagan and) Heckler and the pharma industry in need of a PR success.

  • Wow what a great idea ! This one reduces population by not only killing the patient but also the baby of the patient. Plus you get paid for making the poison and for administering it also. Plus you can stop people from getting pregnant because they fear having unprotected sex. Then they get to sell the women surgery so they cant become pregnant. Ya gotta love eugenics and the nwo. I bet Sanger is laughing in hell right now.

  • Comment removed

  • This guy is an idiot and not only that, he's spreading dangerous lies. I work at an AIDS agency and see our clients die. I can't even list the amount of incorrect information he spews here...but I am scared for people who actually listen to it.

  • @melrichard07 You getting paid is financial bias NOT scientific evidence for your virus of mass destruction cult.

  • @melrichard07 “Where is the research that says HIV is the cause of AIDS? There are 10,000 people in the world now who specialize in HIV. None has any interest in the possibility HIV doesn’t cause AIDS because if it doesn’t, their expertise is useless.”.......— Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing the PCR basis for the HIV viral load tests.

    google.....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?

    ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW”

    SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Don't listen to melrichard07 he is a youtube/government shill. He has zero friends, no videos, and his activity is all his assignments. It makes no sense to argue with them because they are paid liars. It's easy to spot them. When they are the only ones who call the guy crazy look at his page. COLD BUSTED! The shills are losing the info war. Nobody is buying their lies anymore. They need to stop hurting people with false info and stop selling out their own people.

  • @melrichard07 Go find another job that makes you less of a traitor to your fellow man shill. Your lies and deceptions have been exposed. Just go away and stop telling lies and trying to help the drug companies kill more people!

  • I knew it, it is a $ game. many people die because the $ making medicine.

  • yo idiots, HIV is not real. It's just a way to reduce population because of all the crime that has been going on these past few decades. Just look at africa for gods sake!!! they're MULTIPLYING and they never have protected sex. its all fuckin bullshit, sex is supposed to be unprotected, protection was someting that was implemented by govts.  when adam and eve had sex im sure as hell they didnt use a condom. its all bullshit guys.

  • @unclemurdaify The rate of infection is going up. The population is going up because of a high birthrate. With some subsaharan countries having an average of seven children for every one woman. It's not surprising the population is going up. 

  • @markxxx21 Google....HIV DOUBLETHINK

    "What is the greatest tribulation for a continent ravaged by a deadly incurable virus spread sexually and from mother to child, where in many parts of that continent the infection rate is as high as 30%, occasionally even higher?

    High birth rates, of course........"

  • hiv is a mutated virus from imuno def from monkeys into humans what hiv causes its the imuno def and then causes cancer etc anyone with defective imuno system can have aids, or die with various deceases cancer fungus bacteria virus the body itself becomes a open door to everything but hiv can cause aids or the end of body to be imuno successful

  • @ukusapillage And you have made the researches, right? The HIV hasn't even been isolated, so how the hell will you know all that? And the monkey's similar "supposed" virus, the SIV, doesn't produce AIDS in the monkeys and this is proven!!! Before talking about HIV and its effects you MUST prove its existence. I am not saying it doesn't exist nor it does, I'm saying you cannot prove it. NO ONE CAN. The tests might show the existence of other viruses, yes, but then again, we're back to step 1.

    .

  • @yowyOw69 Yes it's been isolated. HIV does not effect monkeys they have a similar SIV virus. Look at Ebola.There are four type,. three are lethal to humans Ebola Reston is not. AIDS is a syndrome this means many not just one.

    Why do none of these people simply infect themselves with HIV and see what happens?

  • @markxxx21 You can't infect yourself with something even the "discoverers" never found in an aids patient. You can't infect yourself with body thetans either.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny

    Nonsense...

    Take someone who is infected with HIV then take one of those people who does not have HIV. Then take blood from HIV+ and inject it into HIV- person. See if this person develops and dies of AIDS. 

  • @markxxx21 "hiv"? You mean the cellular crap Gallo "discovered"? You CANT inject yourself with something even the "discoverers" never found in an aids patient and ALL your "evidence" is based on GALLOS crap antibody tests.

    You may as well use an e-meter to "prove" body thetans.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny

    Yes you can, thousands of blood transfusion patient died of AIDS. You can also directly test for HIV. The antibody test is just more cost effective. And antibody tests have long since gotten more sophisticated.

  • @markxxx21 Are you serious? Are people getting transfusions in good health? NO...you don't need a VMD to explain why people getting transfusions die.

    NAME the direct test for Gallo's fake virus.

  • @markxxx21 “False-positive ELISA test results can be caused by alloantibodies resulting from transfusions, transplantation, or pregnancy, autoimmune disorders, malignancies, alcoholic liver disease, or for reasons that are unclear.” (Doran, et al. False-Positive and Indeterminate Human Immunodeficiency Virus Test Results in Pregnant Women. Arch Family Medicine, 2000)

    Gallo's crap antibody test has no GOLD STANDARD so there's no way to distinguish btw reactions on it

  • @markxxx21 You need to come up with the scientific reference where Gallo showed a DIRECT isolation of this alleged VMD out of an aids patient so he could scientifically validate his crap tests and then linked it to immune problems.

    Weird VMD scaremongering picked up from internet drug marketers is NOT scientific evidence

    google.....THE GUINEA PIG KIDS THE BBC AND AIDSTRUTH MAFIA

    ZERO scientists on the board. "Dr" Jeanne Bergman is a lawyer with a PhD in marketing

  • @LowBid86 What a truly ignorant comment. No, we weren't "all going to die". Only those who had unprotected sex with hiv positive ppl were going to die and most did. There wasn't an epidemic among the broader population because of steps to prevent the spread i.e. blood screening, needle programmes and condom use. Ppl don't die now because of medication. In sub-saharan africa many ppl are still dying and the growth in hiv spead is in the middle east/asia. FFS - try education; not conspiracies.

  • @4165mc How soon people forget...the nation’s top health official, Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala, told Congress in February 1993 that without massive intervention, "There may be no one left."

    There is ZERO scientific evidence that taking ANY of those drugs improves clinical health or mortality and NONE of the drug manufacturers claim other wise for their products. It is highly unlikely that you have better info about those products than those who make them

  • @4165mc You don't need a virus of mass destruction to explain why broke ass people don't live as long as rich ones. There have been NO increases in death rate or decreases in populatin in any country anywhere in the world and NO the "lifesaving" meds have fuck all to do with it

    Google.....AZT LABEL

    also google.....There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

  • Lord bless this man for speaking the truth and spreading the real awareness about HIV/AIDS instead of being a greedy crook like the pharmaceutical companies

  • The truth is a juicer is better protection against disease than the entire pharmaceutical stockpile.

  • The drugs used to treat AIDS is what leads to illness and death. Colloidal silver cures disease, proven.

  • Thank you for this priceless information

  • There is an anti-aids existence campaign in Greece, created by a supposed hiv possitive woman named Maria Papagiannidou! She claims that she was found hiv possitive and when she started taking the pills she started to be ill!

  • @kriton111, could it be that people like her (Maria) have the genetic mutation that makes them resistant to HIV? Her test could have also been a false positive as they were more prone to mistakes when they were first developed the tests in the 80s. Nowadays there is only a 1 in 1,000 chance of getting a false positive.

  • @84Canaan Well, I dont know to answer you. The only I know is that many scientists around the world claim that the virus had never been isolated. And I believe there is a point, but I don't know if it's for good or bad!

  • @84Canaan "Hiv"? You mean the cellular crap Gallo "discovered"? The "hiv proteins" used in/for ALL the antibody tests are exactly the same as the day GALLO got the patent back int he 80s..... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160

    You CANT distinguish btw "false" and "true" + without a Gold STandard. Gallo's crap tests do NOT have one. Go look at the disclaimers....they're on my channel under the pic of the Pope

  • Ok YouTube.

    Where the hell is part 2?

  • for ppl who believe this theory, it is my concern that you are telling ppl it's ok to go out and have unprotected sex with whoever you want and it is ok to share needles. questioning is one thing, but preaching a theory as if it's gold is kinda dangerous and irresponsible. hiv/aids does not discriminate like it seemed to when we first started to learn about it in the 80s.

  • @Sheillala2008 Being a skeptic is not "preaching" and it is not advising people to do anything in particular. I'm an atheist but that does mean I'm suggesting people go out and start killing people since there's no eternal punishment anyway. My belief or disbelief in god or Gallo's virus is separate from my personal morality and sense of responsibility.

    Also...the WHO cancelled the hetero aids epidemic back in 2008 so....looks like "aids" can't be caused by anything infectious. Past tense

  • since taking the time to look at things from an unbiased point of view, what i have come to conclude is that many people who are + and decide to not take the meds eventually end up taking them because they do get very ill and will die without them. azt is in fact still used in combination with other meds that have/do prolong the lives of those infected and, undeniably, its use is still controversial. meds are prescribed on a benefit to risk ratio (all meds). i am an interested student nurse.

  • so whats kills you? the drugs? people are dying are they not?

  • @crisisofconsciousnes the drugs do their damage due to their harsh side effects, which no one in the medical community denies, but they also save people and prolong lives...i think if you start to talk with actual people who are +, a lot will tell you that they eventually need the drugs as they eventually get deathly ill without them

  • @Sheillala2008 There are zero long term controlled studies which show taking those drugs improves clinical health or that they prolong lives. My anecdotes are very different from what you claim people will find if they start asking people for anecdotes. The drug manufacturers also make no claim that their products will improve health or longevity. The test kit manufacturers make no claim that their product detects infection with a Specific virus or what the predictive value the test has

  • SO YOUR SAYING- that if a person is HIV+ it will not lead to full blown AIDS??

  • @MrKelaross being hiv+ is almost a meaningless statistic... useful only to pharmaceutical companies.

  • @AritHeru23 You'd have to be careful with that because people would think that its not something that will infect them?!

  • @MrKelaross Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying! Magic Johnson is still alive, right? 21 years later!

  • @dust2dust2day Bro~I know the Koolaid woman and I will tell you Been Pos for 30 years... Your LIFE is not mine..and you do not know..what it is like to live with this disease..... I have much more to say just write me a message...

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 I think you're speaking to Kevin Kurtisky...he's in the habit of making youtube channels to pretend to be different people. usually he pretends to be a Dr but he's lately made a few to pretend to be an aids patient. He's been harassing me too. I've told him he can't change his "voice" but it doesn't sink in. he works for the Ministry of Aidstruth. They hired him after he was booted out of medical school. See the "Blowing the Whistle" article for details on his expulsion

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 You're unblocked. Ha...of course if you expect a reply you'll have to return the favor

  • Comment removed

  • Google....Gallo's Egg

    "Two dissenters, James Murtagh, MD and and Kevin Kuritzky, were friendly to me at first and “appealed to my better judgment.” Their friendly pressure intrigued me and I began my investigation by checking into their allegations.

    .....I wasn’t as troubled by their allegations as I was by their insistence that I stop my investigation. It seemed incongruous that the individuals who alleged genocide would also pressure me to not investigate their own allegations...."

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny hi koolaid...it's me again lol...i do have a question. 1st i don't believe dust2dust is who you think he is (even though i don't appreciate his attempt at trying to bash me publically when i never bashed him in the 1st place, but merely stood my defense vs his lies until i realized how dumb it was to continue...he wanted to argue even when i agreed lol...but whatev). my biggest q for you is 1. are you saying the virus doesn't exist at all? or that it does and it's harmless?

  • @Sheillala2008 Of course it doesn't exist. The "discoverer" never found any such thing. He just falsified his papers and announced a virus of mass destruction at a press conference. That is a matter of public record. He was found guilty of "scientific misconduct" by the US Gov. The only evidence that anyone has that Gallo's virus exists are tests that Gallo holds the patent on and he based those tests on the virus he did Not actually find in anyone.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny but if he did not actually find the virus, then how could he have stolen & renamed it from the person who already discovered it and called it LAV? were both of them looking at the same nothing?

  • @Sheillala2008 He stole a sample from Montagnier but he never found anything in any of his aids patients. He literally scribbled out the actual findings of his study and penciled in the exact opposite. Montagnier never claimed it was the cause of aids anyway. The whole reason people were studying retroviruses as the cause of cancer just before Gallo's press conference is because retroviruses never kill their host cells.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny, Montagnier does believe the virus exists and that it could lead to AIDS. However, he believes that healthy people can fight of the virus, that only those with weak immune systems would be susceptible to the virus destroying their immune system thus leading to AIDS.

  • @84Canaan “We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.”

    Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997

    — Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny, I know about what Luc says though in the docu "House of Numbers" he does admit that the virus exists. He believes most people can fight the virus off, that only those with weak immune systems can fall susceptible to the virus and progress to AIDS. Also, there must be evidence for the existence if even Duesberg admits the virus exists, he simply doesn't believe it causes AIDS.

  • @84Canaan Why do you reply to me without hitting reply? I know Montagnier never claimed to have discovered the cause of aids and the sample Gallo stole from him didn't even come from anyone with aids so.....

    IF what Montagnier found was the cause of aids then WHY wasn't it causing aids in his patient and WHY didn't Gallo find it in his full blown aids patients? Montagnier has been trying to back out of this VMD mess for decades. He's too spineless though

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny , They're not going to inject people with what ever AIDS patients have, they test it on cell cultures and the cells die in those cultures. Also, in the 80s people who received transfusions from donors who later developed AIDS or had died from it also ended up developing the disease. How do you explain these cases that occurred before AZT was even was available? People had been receiving blood for decades so why suddenly in the 80s they developed immune problems from it?

  • @84Canaan NO...they do NOT. You're just making shit up

    google.....20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.

    #18. Why are exactly the same cells that HIV is said to kill in vivo not killed in vitro where productively infected cultures continue to produce 1000s of infectious particles per day for use in the various "AIDS tests" and are not protected by antibodies or "antiretroviral" drugs (29)?

    scroll down for the direct link to the reference

  • @84Canaan The 1st aids cases were in a bunch of drug addicts. You don't need a virus of mass destruction to explain why drug addicts get sick and die and...duh!....if you're getting a transfusion you are already in very bad health. You don't need a VMD to explain why people getting transfusions are sick either.

    The ONLY "evidence" you have for Gallo's fake ass virus are NONspecific reactions on Gallo's crap "hiv" antibody test.

  • @84Canaan Google.....Why I Quit Hiv" by Rebecca Culshaw

    " Most importantly, such antibody tests have been rigorously verified against the GOLD STANDARD of microbial isolation. This stands in vivid contrast to HIV, for which antibody tests are used because there exists.....NO........ test for the actual virus."

    “At present there is.... no recognized standard........... for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.” (Abbott labs HIV-1/2 test

  • @84Canaan If you remove my comments from your channel I remove yours from mine. VMD cultists are incapable of logical debate and have to resort to censorship. I'm not going to allow someone to leave comments on my channel if you refuse me the right to reply...no you haven't done it yet but....I've dealt with you VMD cultists enough to know how you operate.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny, People in car accidents or with gun wounds receive blood transfusions and we did not see them getting AIDS before 1980s. When they investigated they found these people had received blood from donors who had died of AIDS or were dying from it. As for cell cultures, the few labs that were looking for a virus in early 80s couldn't because their cell lines kept dying, whatever was causing AIDS was killing their cells rather quickly.

  • @84Canaan We don't see them getting "aids" now either. A recent transfusion is one of the documented reasons for reactions on Gallo's crap test. They also used to transfuse blood to transplant patient Before their surgery because it is well known that transfusions suppress the immune system.

    Also.....BULLSHIT for your claims about blah blah blah whatever. "Proof" by assertion is NOT scientific evidence.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny, Peter Duesberg one of the most prominent denialists has admitted that the virus exists. Researchers must have found it if he believes in it now? The only thing Duesberg says is that he doesn't think HIV causes AIDS; he thinks HIV is harmless.

  • @84Canaan Denialist of WHAT exactly? I don't give a fuck if someone beleeeves Gallo's virus is real. That isn't scientific evidence.

    Are you fucking STUPID? Are you trying to convince me that Gallo made THE luckiest guess eva eva eva in the histiry of the wordl 4 eva eva? He found....NOTHING! Lucky guess my ASS!

  • Dr. "Gonda, Matthew" , the Head of Electron Microscopy at the NIH XE "National Institutes of Health"...... to "Gallo, Robert" . He reports that images wanted for the Science papers, do.........NOT....... contain HIV XE "HIV" (HTLVIII) as Gallo had claimed, but only cellular rubbish. This was received only 3 days before Gallo sent in the Science papers for publication, When the papers appeared in print, they still contained photos credited to Gonda, with Gallo saying they contain HIV.

  • To see Gonda's letter to Gallo google.....A Selection of HIV Documents

    Evidence of Fraud?

    Unearthed by US Governmental Investigations into the scientific work of Dr. Robert Gallo

    Scroll down to see what Gallo the great "discoverer" scribbled out......"Despite intensive research efforts the causative agent of aids has.....NOT....been indentified"

    then he called a press conference and hit the patent office. Gallo is the "hiv" antibody test patent holder

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny, You keep promoting things like House of Numbers, The Other Side of AIDS ect, you should know who Duesberg is. He's the one who started the theory that HIV did not cause AIDS, that HIV antibody tests are useless, his theories are the ones you believe in. Kary Mullis another person you promote is one of Duesberg's biggest supporters. That's the Duesberg I'm speaking of and he has said that the virus does exist, but he thinks it's harmless and that it doesn't cause AIDS

  • @84Canaan Dude...do not tell me what I do and do not believe. You need to look up logical fallacies. Appeal to authority is not scientific evidence. GALLO is the "hiv" antibody test patent holder. A virus of mass destruction was all GALLOS bright idea. And what exactly did Gallo find? That would be NOTHING and imaginary things can't hurt you. It's pretty simple

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny, It was all Gallo's idea? He wasn't even interested in the beginning about AIDS. Not many scientists cared for it since they believed it was caused by poppers or over-stimulation of immune system. However, the NIH did tests on animals and they found that poppers could not cause the symptoms of AIDS, also people who did not meet the profiles of the first cases started getting it as well so it was clear that poppers and over-stimulation were not the cause.

  • @84Canaan YES....a virus of mass destruction was all GALLOS bright idea. GALLO is also the so-called "hiv" antibody test patent holder.

    ALL your "evidence" is based on the results of GALLOS tests. Don't "forget" now. You VMD cultists all want to "forget" about your guru....L Ron GALLO

  • @84Canaan Gallo RC et al. Frequent Detection and Isolation of Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and at Risk for AIDS. Science. 1984 May 4; 224: 500–3.

    Gallo again admitting, in one of his seminal papers, that they only found evidence for HIV (however questionable the evidence is, and however questionable Gallo's research in general) in a..... minority...... of patients with “AIDS".

    Gee....where did all that "aids" come from with no sign of Gallo's imaginary virus?

  • @84Canaan Also...it is not anyone's opinion that Gallo's tests are UNstandardized crap. Go read the disclaimers. When they run Mullis's test they never even find the same thing twice.

  • @Sheillala2008 Do you think Gallo made THE luckiest guess ever ever ever? He Guessed it was a retrovirus causing immune problems and then Guessed what the proteins and nucleic acids are? He had nothing to observe or examine so.....what? What exactly did he base those tests on?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • but he is not a doctor, he is a journalist, his job is to get the attention of people

  • This Mr Crowe is full of crap, did you remember 1981 to 1991 how many thousands died for the epidemic?.... or they died for other causes?

  • @tolomia1 Yes...the original aids cases were in drug addicts. You don't need a virus of mass destruction to explain why druggies get sick and die

  • Google....AZT LABEL

    Skull and crossbones TOXIC Toxic by inhalation in contact with the skin and if swallowed. Target organ: Blood Bone Marrow. If you feel unwell seek medical advice. Wear suitable protective clothing

    This label has appeared on bottles containing as little as 25 milligrams,

    a small fraction (1/20-1/50) of a patients daily prescribed dose.

  • Concorde Coordinating Committee. Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trial of immediate and deferred zidovudine in symptom-free HIV infection. Lancet. 1994 Apr 9; 343(8902): 871–81.

    A total of 172 died [169 who had taken some AZT, 3 who had only taken placebo]...The results of Concorde do not encourage the early use of AZT in symptom-free...adults. They also call into question the uncritical use of CD4 cell counts as a surrogate endpoint for assessment of benefit...."

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 No honey...TITLE DATE and JOURNAL

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 Lol...Honey you don't even know how to post a scientific reference and when you manage to scrape up a link it's outdated and doesn't say what you claim it does.

    It isn't up to me to find your evidence for you. I already posted recent studies which refute your outdated irrelevant one.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 That makes NO claim to improve health or lifespan. NONE! All it refers to is cd4 counts. Duh!

    INTERPRETATION: Virological response after starting HAART improved over calendar years, but such improvement has.........NOT.........transl­ated into a decrease in mortality.

    Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):451-8.

    HIV treatment response and prognosis in Europe and North America in the first decade of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis

  • Concorde Coordinating Committee. Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trial of immediate and deferred zidovudine in symptom-free HIV infection. Lancet. 1994 Apr 9; 343(8902): 871–81.

    "The results of Concorde do not encourage the early use of zidovudine in symptom-free HIV-infected adults. They also call into question the uncritical use of CD4 cell counts as a surrogate endpoint for assessment of benefit from long-term antiretroviral therapy..."

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 Um....NO it doesn't say anything about improved health or lifespan. You already saw recent studies which say straight up that cd4 counts have **** all to do with improved mortality. Stop posting outdated irrelevant studies

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008Honey...not only was that study outdated it said NOTHING about improvements in life span and more recent studies found exactly the opposite Lol...talk about an appeal to false authority. Go ask her for the primary peer reviewed scientific reference where the alleged "hiv" proteins were shown to belong to Gallo's virus and he linked it to immune problems...no a youtube video doesn't count.

  • Google.....

    Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers

    ".... a letter from an em expert indicating that Gallo’s samples did....NOT...contain any virus, and a letter from Gallo to a researcher verifying that HIV could.....NOT..... be purified directly from human materials.... In 1993, gov. investigators determined Gallo had so poorly recorded his key and much-cited experiment that it was IMPOSSIBLE to repeat and verify it. "

  • Dr. Gonda XE "Gonda, Matthew" , the Head of Electron Microscopy at the NIH XE " ... to Gallo XE "Gallo, Robert" . He reports that images wanted for the Science papers, do..............NOT...........­... contain "HIV" (HTLVIII) s Gallo had claimed, but only cellular rubbish.

    This was received only 3 days before Gallo sent in the Science papers for publication, When the papers appeared in print, they still contained photos credited to Gonda, with Gallo saying they contain HIV.

  • “Where is the research that says HIV is the cause of AIDS? There are 10,000 people in the world now who specialize in HIV. None has any interest in the possibility HIV doesn’t cause AIDS because if it doesn’t, their expertise is useless.” Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing PCR basis for the HIV viral load tests

    for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 lol...stop lying. You said you were "opne" then went on an abusive rant on my channel due to some mystery accuser and secret evidence that you said openly that you weren't going to let me in on

    YOU attacked ME. Your comments are still up on my channel.

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 It isn't about ME being credible. Tough if you take offense at me taking offense over your secret trials of me.

  • Comment removed

  • @Sheillala2008 The "hiv" test kit disclaimers are not an "opinion". Gallo being found guilty of "scientific misconduct" for the exact same papers everyone's been chasing their tails over for 27 years is not an "opinion" Those meds being worse than useless is also not an "opinion"

    I get that I can come off too forcefully but it's my human duty to alert the herd to the science behind the marketing whether people get pissed at me for it or not.