well..."explosion" is just a western take on the thing. it was silent, why not call it the "big unfolding Lotus" theory? just depends upon your point of view....
this makes some good sense. The nothingness is not a clear area for which to be filled,but a perfection in which no sub- atomic reactions are flawed. The human existence and other complications can show just how messed up we really are. I mean the closest theory to our existence is an explosion. that just screams imperfection.
That would be Dharmakirti. I prefer Nagarjuna's stance: there are no "bits" of nothing, only boundariless space in which the energies and consciousness interact mutually and are without any substance whatsoever.
How blocked is your nose?
sanditaylor1990 2 weeks ago
Daffy Duck sounds smart
daanharder 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Daffy duck sounds smart
daanharder 1 year ago
Comment removed
daanharder 1 year ago
arebt you the guy from who's line is it anyway?
christuimbirek 1 year ago
shit so i wasn't crazy and i will live forever yay!! ... coming to tinck agin :S shit!!!
christuimbirek 1 year ago
well..."explosion" is just a western take on the thing. it was silent, why not call it the "big unfolding Lotus" theory? just depends upon your point of view....
james
opensourcebuddhism 1 year ago
this makes some good sense. The nothingness is not a clear area for which to be filled,but a perfection in which no sub- atomic reactions are flawed. The human existence and other complications can show just how messed up we really are. I mean the closest theory to our existence is an explosion. that just screams imperfection.
FullmetalCombine 1 year ago
That would be Dharmakirti. I prefer Nagarjuna's stance: there are no "bits" of nothing, only boundariless space in which the energies and consciousness interact mutually and are without any substance whatsoever.
James
opensourcebuddhism 3 years ago
Who was it that claimed the universe is made up of little bits of nothing? Couldn't catch the name.
NeoPrakrti 3 years ago