Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (230)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THE DAMNED KENYAN OUGHT TO BE IN JAIL !

    AMERICA , YOU LOST THE REPUBLIC WHILE YOU WERE BUSY WATCHING TRASH LIKE TIGER WOODS AND LADY GAGA ,

    NONE OF YOUR SUPREME COURT IS A PROTESTANT NOW .

    JESUITS WROTE THE PATRIOT ACT AT JESUIT GEORGETOWN UNI.

    See ' Total Onslaught ' series if you want to know truth - and the rest , be damned !

    Sheeple will not even boycott airlines TSA perverts !

    I despise the damned sheele !

    The damned SHEEPLE allow globalist shits to run America .

  • Here's is Lakin's addres, I'm going to send him a copy of Obama's birth certificate, and a copy of the book Dreams From My Father.

    Terrence Lakin #89996

    830 Sabalu Road

    Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027

  • Why does he use the SS# that belongs to someone else ?..In Conneticutt

  • @Cassandrea007

    Oh? Who does it belong to?

  • I'm kind of bummed that the birther movement has ended. I'm really going to miss the clowns. I'm sure some of them will linger on, but now that they clearly have *no* hope left, it just won't be the same.

  • Comment removed

  • Cut 'n' pasted direct from US Passport Application website: *A certified birth certificate has a registrar's raised, embossed, impressed or multicolored seal, registrar's signature, and the date the certificate was filed with the registrar's office, which must be within 1 year of your birth. Please note, some short (abstract) versions of birth certificates may not be acceptable for passport purposes.

  • @gnash555 So again, if you are the person at the US State Department tasked with making the decision as to whether to issue a passport to President Obama, then perhaps you have some relevant point. Since you are NOT that person, what relevance does this have? And what is the relevance of passport applications to date and location of birth?

  • That guy on the video: honored? decorated veteran? Lakin was the one who refused to go to Afghanistan, he was the one who f** up himself ! Look at the other one, " Mr Obama to show his records.. but he PRODUCED his bc and even his passport is in YT! but you dont want to see it idiots! Lakin doesn't deserve to be called "honored" he deserves what he got, what a bunch of dimwits and they are "allowed" to vote, OMG what a bunch of ignorants!

  • @clarity023 O was born a Sovereign citizen of Kenya at birth due to a Kenyan dad. You cannot be born as a Sovereign citizen of 2 countries simultaneously which defies all the laws of nature. He cannot claim that he was born as a Sovereign U.S. citizen bcs soil or a mom isnt where we get our Natural Sovereign Political Rights from. They are endowed via Nature through our citizen fathers. So, he wasnt born a natural representative of the Sovereign citizens of the U.S. by Article II requirements.

  • The fourteenth amendment affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory, in the allegiance and under the protection of the country, including all children here born of resident aliens, with the exceptions or qualifications of children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, or born on foreign public ships, or of enemies within and during a hostile occupation of part of our territory, and with the single additional exception of children of members

    cont.

  • cont, of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes. The amendment, in clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born within the territory of the United States of all other persons, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States.

    Case closed.

  • @clarity023 The only reason we have the 14th is bcs the slave States refused to recognize the Sovereign Political Right of black males to create Sovereign State citizens by birth inheritance. So, authority was given to the Fed Gov to use Sovereign State territory to declare blacks to be citizens to protect their Natural Sovereign Political Rights. The 14th proves my case not yours. Sovereign citizens by birth inheritance don't require soil or the 14th Amend. O is unlawful end of story.

  • @clarity023 Neither u nor Congress nor the Courts have the right to dictate to Sovereign U.S. citizens that O can represent the Sovereign U.S. citizens when he wasnt born to a Sovereign citizen father, anymore than the King of England in 1776 had the right to dictate to the Colonists who declared their own Sovereign Political Right to be free & self representative. The Pres must be from one of the Sovereign citizens who are born inheriting that right as a function of Nature not soil or statutes.

  • @clarity023 You do not understand Natural Law. Citizenship by soil is a PRIVILEGE not a Natural Right. Sovereign citizens are created by inheritance not by soil. You don't even understand the 14th Amendment. Article II is referring to those born as Sovereign U.S. citizens which is a sub class of the general statutory defined nat born citizens who don't even require citizen moms or dads. You cannot be born as a Sovereign U.S. citizen if your dad is a foreigner. You are a fool agent 023.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Herbert Hoover had a Canadian-born mother. Woodrow's mother was English. Chester Arthur and James Buchanan both had Irish fathers. Jefferson's mother was born in England, and Andrew Jackson's parents were both born in Ireland.

    Along with McCain, Romney's father was born in Mexico, Richardson's parents were both foreign-born, his father from Nicaragua and his mother from Mexico.

    And why are all of these people eligible for the presidency of the US?

    cont.

  • cont. Because the Supreme Court, after citing many, many precedents, ultimately decided in US v. WONG KIM ARK that the 14th Amendment guaranteed citizenship to all persons born in the US, regardless of their ethnic heritage.

  • @clarity023 14th guarantees the PRIVILEGE of citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil no matter the parents (dad removed from consideration). Those are called nbc due to soil (English common law citizen "subjects"). Has nothing to do with Article II nat born Citizen which is referring to those born as Sovereign citizens which dosnt depend on soil or mom (both removed) but requires a citizen dad. Sovereignty is a nat inherited political right that only comes from having a Sovereign citizen dad.

  • @clarity023 Mothers are irrelevant bcs we don't inherit Sovereign Political Rights from females or soil. They had citizen dads That takes care of HH & Woody. Buchanan's father was a naturalized U.S. citizen so no issue there. Chester Arthur was not elected Pres. He was vise Pres & no one knew that his dad was not a U.S. citizen until after. Both Jefferson & Jackson fall under the sunset clause of Article II bcs he was a citizen at the time of the adoption. You have no point or issue. NEXT.

  • So, how did it work out at LTC Lakin's trial? Did he win or what?

  • @james0tucson @james0tucson They gave him 6 mths in a "march the guilty b@stard in" foregone conclusion.

    So from now on, military personnel should be aware that, if someone pins a couple of stars to his uniform and starts giving out orders, then everyone is supposed to obey "The General's" orders, without asking for ID, even if they strongly suspect him to be a supply clerk.

    These rulings just get more and more ridiculous as they try to protect the illegal alien in the White House

  • @gnash555 The 6 months is nothing compared to losing an O-5 retirement, pay, allowances, benefits, and family benefits. That's a *lot* to lose.

    If someone starts giving out orders that don't meet the approval of the chain of command, that would be swiftly dealt with from *above* the chain.

    As for the "illegal alien in the White House", repeating it doesn't make it so. By all evidence he was born a US citizen.

  • @james0tucson

    All the evidence is, that he hasn't got a Long Form Birth Certificate (NOT a Certificate of Live Birth like the one that's paraded on the internet) or he SURELY would have shown it by now just to shut people up!

    It's completely unreasonable of Obama to not show it if he's got it!

    Just Google "US Passport Application" and tell me that a Certificate of Live Birth is enough to guarantee a Passport. It's all there on the damn' website! FFS! Just show the damned passport!!

  • @gnash555 You seem pretty confused about what "evidence" means.

    The director of the Hawaii Dept of Health has already declared *under oath* that the information on that COLB is valid, which means there is no meaning to any claim that he was born at any other time or place.

    As for the Passport strawman, are you the State Department, and have you rejected a Hawaii COLB for an application? If not, you're raising a completely irrelevant point.

  • @gnash555

    Actually, you have the terminology incorrect.

    A "CERTIFICATE" of Live Birth is a long form birth certificate. Google: Nordyke twins > click images

    A "CERTIFICATION" of Live Birth is the document that Obama has.

    It is a valid, legal, State Certified birth certificate. It is the only type that Hawaii has issued since 2001 when all their vital records were converted to electronic format.

    Mine. from the same issuing agency is identical. That *IS* my birth certificate.

  • @gnash555 You are the one who supposedly needs a "long form birth certificate". You have not shown that you are personally entitled to demand it, nor have you shown in *any* way that President Obama was born anywhere but the place where the state of Hawaii says he was born, or at any time other than the time the state of Hawaii says he was born.

    There is simply no scenario where you will get what you are demanding. It is abundantly clear that you have no evidence to dispute the record.

  • Lakin will be having Christmas dinner at Ft. Leavenworth.

  • Who could be more American than President Obama, a direct descendant of Thomas Blossom, who travelled from England to the New World on the Mayflower, and settled in Plymouth?

    Obama was born in the State of Hawaii, making him a natural born citizen.

    There is nothing more to discuss.

  • @james0tucson IDIOT natural born citizens due to soil has absolutely nothing at all to do with "natural born Citizen" in Article II. You are such an illiterate fool that you cannot even understand when you are dealing with a homonym. You cannot remove the political context of Article II and the purpose and intent of Article II and ignore them and just substitute an invented statutory definition of a person born on the soil to a foreign father. Your concept is retarded and ignorant and WRONG

  • @jedipauly CHESTER A. ARTHUR.

    Sworn to before me this 4th day of May, 1854.

    WM. A. DUSENBERRY, Com. of Deeds.

    Indorsed; filed May 8, 1854.

    State of New York,

    City and County of New York, \ ss

    I, William A. Butler, Clerk of the said City and County,

  • @jedipauly PRESIDENT ARTHUR’S MESSAGE SEVERELY CRITICIZED BY

    A ST. PETERSBURG JOURNAL-EXCEPTION TAKEN TO

    THE CONDITION OF THE JEWS IN RUSSIA.

    (By cable to the Herald.)

    London, December 12, 1881.

    …Arthur even refrains from making comments

    on English home affairs–the Irish rebellion, for instance,

    which is agitating millions of American citizens, who are

    also born Irishmen like the President.

  • @jedipauly And as usual, leaving the best for last. A. P. Hinman assuming that Arthur was born in Canada, wrote a letter to Senator Bayard, asking if the father becoming naturalized could make his [alleged Canadian born] son a “natural born citizen”

  • @SupremekaiD5 There is a huge diff between "natural born citizen" that is defined by soil or your mother & Article II "natural born Citizen" The two terms are legal homonyms and legal antonyms and they are not interchangeable or substitutable. Its too bad that you are too ignorant of law & science to understand the difference or enter into an intelligent discussion regarding this issue. You just might discover the true nature of reality & what freedom and liberty truly means.

  • @jedipauly No get your ignorant self back into school your agenda is to take away the rights of people born to foreigners in this country so dont tell me about freedom and liberty your ignorant of law

  • @SupremekaiD5 You can't take away rights that they don't even have, idiot. Those born to foreigners are not born as Sovereign U.S. citizens or else they would not need the soil or statutes to define them as citizens. You are a total fucking moron and communist asshole. It is clear to anyone that Article II is not talking about just any nat born citizen but it means those born as Sovereign citizens. Hence the Proper noun "Citizen" Only a citizen dad can create sovereign citizens at birth.

  • @jedipauly fuck off dictator your the asshole judging people on their parents trying to take away peoples rights based on their dads it doesent matter who the fuck their parents are they are natural born citizens clearly stated in the 14th amendment

  • @SupremekaiD5 Dumbshit, why do you even think we have a 14th Amendment? The only reason is bcs the slave States refused to recognize the Natural Sovereign Political Rights of black males to be free to create Sovereign citizen children so the Fed gov was given authority to use the sovereign soil jurisdiction of the States to declare blacks to be U.S. citizens so that their natural Sovereign Political rights that where inherited from the Laws of Nature from their black fathers would be protected.

  • @SupremekaiD5 The 14th Amendment proves me right and you wrong. There is NO Natural Political Right for those born on U.S. soil to a foreign father to claim he was created at birth to be a Sovereign U.S. citizen who inherited a Sovereign Political Right to be Pres so I cannot be denying anyone any rights, dumbshit. Congress nor Courts can endow one with the Political Right to be Pres. Only nature can do that by having a sovereign citizen father so you can inherit that right.

  • @SupremekaiD5 No where in the 14th Amend does it say that u are created at birth to be a natural born sovereign citizen. The 14th only uses the general term lower case "citizen" which isnt declaring the citizens born of soil to be created to inherit a sovereign political right as a U.S. citizen. Even if such citizens are deemed by a court to be "nbc" they cannot claim a sovereign right to be Pres if their father was not a citizen. Neither Congress nor a Judge can bestow natural political rights.

  • @SupremekaiD5 None of your ignorant rantings of non-law & illogic can ever change the natural reality that O inherited a sovereign political right from his foreign Kenyan father which makes him a sovereign citizen of Kenya at birth not a sovereign U.S. citizen even if he was entitled to the privilege of U.S. citizenship via soil or his mom. This precludes O ever being able to claim an inherited political right from a sovereign U.S. citizen father, to be Pres of the U.S., according to Article II.

  • @jedipauly dumbass 14th amendment makes people born here a natural born citizen there are only 2 types of citizens in the USA a natural born citizen and a naturalized citizen

  • @SupremekaiD5 NO, there is a third kind that you are missing that dosnt require statutes or Judges to exist but the Congress & the Courts are supposed to be bound by Article II & the Declaration of Independence to recognize them. They are the natural born SOVEREIGN CITIZENS, the ones that are created by SOVEREIGN CITIZEN FATHERS. You cannot have a Sovereign Republic of Sovereign citizens if there is no way to create sovereign citizens & you can only create them with a sovereign citizen dad.

  • @SupremekaiD5 Your mistake is that u fail to realize that Article II "nat born Citizen" creates the recognition of a third class of citizens that are a subset of the general class of "nat born citizens". The political context of Article II removes the soil & mom from consideration & requires a citizen dad so that the natural right to claim membership in the sovereign body of sovereign citizens is guaranteed by natural laws. The 14th Amendment & U.S. case law "nbc" removes dad from consideration.

  • @jedipauly no you havent proven shit just your own bullshit theory if what you said was true obama wouldnt be the president i know its hard for you to grasp that

  • @SupremekaiD5 I know it is hard for u to grasp that your so called government is a FRAUD and thoroughly corrupt and does not represent you but is trying to enslave you instead to statutes that are not valid laws. Just because you bleat your ignorant beliefs that ignores half of the Law (Natural Law Jurisdiction & Sovereignty) that is clearly spelled out in the Declaration of Independence and what the entire point of the War of 1776 was all about dosnt make reality to be what u are saying it is.

  • @SupremekaiD5 It's not "my" theory it's THE CORRECT SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF LAW that I am just describing that proves O isn't legit & the gov is criminal. I didn't invent the Laws of Nature or Sovereignty or write the Dec of Independence. I am not inventing anything, I just discovered this by study. You cannot remove half of the Law (Natural Law and Sovereignty) and only use the half (Positive Law) that suits your opinions. You have to use ALL of the Law and History to understand Article II nbC.

  • @jedipauly

    If Obama wasn't legit he would not be president. Agnew's father was Greek not naturalized when he was born, he was registered as "alien" in the 1920 Census, look up at Barackyphal.

    Go to CONSTITUTIONAL TOPIC:CITIZENSHIP read the 8 topics 'NOWHERE is indicated "2 citizen" parents.

    Born here=natural born=jus soli. You still can't prove or show any law in the Constitution stating your stupid claim.

    Why do you think Rand Paul want to strip citizenship to children of

    cont

  • @jedipauly cont. undocumented aliens? The Supreme Court recognizes only 2 citizenships: natural born and naturalized , no not 3 citizenships, just two. Obama didn't go thru a process to be American he WAS born American, plus his mom was American too!

    I've seen you around and you just don't want to admit it, all 75+ lawsuits against Obama's eligibility have been dumped and Lakins is going to be in jail for Christmas, LMAO!

  • @SupremekaiD5 So, dumbshit, u are saying that sovereign U.S. citizen fathers cannot create sovereign U.S. citizens at birth but foreign sovereign citizen fathers can create Sovereign U.S. citizens? Now who is the DICTATOR? It's YOU & Cong & Obama & the Courts bcs they are dictating to Sovereign U.S. citizens that foreign Sovereign citizen dads can create U.S. sovereign citizens which is naturally impossible & that the Sovereign U.S. citizens can be dictated to by this special privileged class.

  • @SupremekaiD5 Don't worry to explain anything to jedi, he knows he is wrong, that's his game, changing US laws to his convenience.

    These birthers need medical help that's all. Did you see that Lakin was convicted? I knew it. My sister is retired from the Army, she served 24 yrs and she told me that guy is an idiot, Obama is American.

    That sentence was decided by 8 colonels not Obama. The truth is that Lakin is going to be in jail for Christmas and Obama in the WHouse, LOL!

  • @clarity023 they sure do need help well theres a pill for everythingnow lol i was in the navy for a little bit i just talked to one of my former majors today and he told me lakin didnt even have any evidence he just put down his foot and said he's not going

  • @SupremekaiD5

    The birfers are finished, haha truth prevails, Obama is ignoring all this bs . Notice that the birthers fell on their own trap. All the lawsuits have been dumped! and now Lakin is in jail hahahaha what a buch of idiots!

  • @clarity023 oh we wont see them until the 2012 election they will drive the voters insane

  • @SupremekaiD5 he just put down his foot and said he's not going

    And he ended up paying what amounts to AT LEAST a $2 million fine. An O-5 retirement is nothing to sneeze at.

    It remains to be seen whether he can possibly have a civilian medical career after this. With a felony conviction, he won't be allowed to write prescriptions and most states will refuse to license him.

  • @james0tucson

    Really? Lakin will have a restriction on his medical license? ugh, that's going to be bad for him!

  • @jedipauly you fail to realize that what you state was never written down in the constitution about needing a father to be a nbc so why dont you make a time machine and go make a change to the constitution

  • @SupremekaiD5 It's implied from the Law, dumbass. It's clearly written there it just requires knowledge of Law which includes Natural Law & Sovereignty which you are obviously lacking in. You just want to use only part of the law (Positive Law) and ignore the parts of law (Natural Law) that proves you are wrong. Obama cannot possibly qualify without a sovereign citizen father to pass on the natural sovereign political right to be Pres that Article II requires by the Laws of Nature. U R WRONG

  • @SupremekaiD5 I have now proved u wrong & that u are a fool or else u are a communist who is out to attack the sovereign political rights of free U.S. citizens. It was never intended that the 14th Amend could extend privileges to children born of foreign dads to claim the natural political right to be Pres. That would mean that Congress was given power to create a monarchy & Presidential privilege statute for anyone they choose & disenfranchise the sovereign citizens of their political rights.

  • @jedipauly

    " that Article II "nat born Citizen" creates the recognition of a third class of citizens that are a subset of the general class of "nat born citizens"."

    HAHAHAHAHAHA Write a letter to Congress and tell them this, they will pee on his pants laughing @ YOU!

  • @clarity023 That just shows how ignorant & retarded & elitist you & they have become when you both refuse to recognize the Natural Sovereign Political Rights of the People to be Free & self governing by representatives who are born as one of the Sovereign citizens. The last time people & Gov acted the way you are acting, like aristocratic LORDS over the people, it caused a War (1776) I guess its time to wage war again & kick your pathetic elitist asses once more so that we can be free.

  • @clarity023 What a pathetic moron & idiot you are. It has been 2 yrs & u still haven't learned the diff between Natural Rights & Legal Rights which are privileges. There has never been a Pres elected that was not created by a citizen father (Natural Right) or who was a citizen at the time of the adoption (legal PRIVILEGE exception bcs the Colonists were born as citizen "subjects" of the kings soil). Only a monarchy uses the soil for owed political allegiance. The U.S. isn't a monarchy.

  • @clarity023 The very fact that an exception had to be made in Article II, due to those born on the kings soil, should inform you that nbC in Article II is not referring to soil anymore and means that you must inherit your natural political right to be Pres (claim a sovereign political authority) from your free sovereign citizen dad. Since the Constitution can only be changed by amendment it cannot mean nbc by soil that only came later via statutes & judges & not by Amendment. You are an idiot.

  • @jedipauly

    I just have few words for you: 75+ lawsuits against Obama eligibility=failure

    Kenyans bc = proven fakes

    Birthers pseudolaws= failure

    Lakin= in jail

    Obama= still in the White House!

    HAHAHAHAHAHA

    Who is the idiot?= YOU!!!

  • @clarity023 The issue is not over, fool. You are the "birther" bcs you believe being "birthed" on U.S. soil qualifies one for Pres. That makes you the "birther", idiot. I am a Constitutionalist. You are a COMMUNIST ASSHOLE. We will see who has the last laugh. One day the truth will finally dawn on you that you have been wrong all this time and you have been SCAMMED by LIARS AND FRAUDS. I just pray I am there to laugh at you FOOL. I am glad I am not you. I wouldn't want your Karma.

  • @jedipauly

    If in fact you are a "Constitutionalist" as you state here, then WHY is it that not once have you mentioned Joe Biden's eligibility???

    Have you seen his long form birth certificate? Has he proven his eligibility?

    Seems to me a REAL "Constitutionalist" would want to make damn sure the Constitution is being followed across the board. Why are you only asking about Obama?

  • @jedipauly

    Birfers have been saying "the issue is not over" for a long time since the Donofrios first lawsuit , then the October 2008 surprise, well surprise is December 2010 and Obama is still in office!! hahahaha

  • @clarity023 "Birfers have been saying "the issue is not over" for a long time since the Donofrios first lawsuit"

    I've been saying it was over ever since I became aware that Birthers were supporting both Donofrio (who claimed that Obama was born in Hawaii) and Berg (who claimed that Obama was born in Kenya). I never got past that; it was plainly obvious that there was no merit to any of the lawsuits, but the Birthers needed *something, anything* to help them cope with the shock of Pres Obama

  • @clarity023 Your conclusions are FALSE. Obama may illegally occupy the white house with communist help but I have the last say on whether or not any Bills that he signs are obeyed by me, which are not even valid laws, so I trump you and the Congress and Obama. So, I guess I win and I am having the last laugh on you and O. I would like to see a court try and enforce any of O's invalid laws on me. Not going to happen. Power to the Sovereign People!!!

  • @clarity023 "75+ lawsuits against Obama eligibilit=failure"

    Number of lawsuits decided on the merits? ZERO all dismissed for lack of jurisdiction which I happen to agree with. This isnt a failure due to the facts that O is not qualified. This is a resounding indictment on the incompetence of the attorneys involved. Its a personal failure for the attorneys. If they would only bring the correct case which is a Title 42 section 1983 things would not be so simple for you and the courts to dismiss

  • @jedipauly

    Number of lawsuits decided that they are FRIVOLOUS, that's why Oily Titz had to pay $20K on penalties, because she was wasting the court's time, hahaha that's the worst thing a judge can say!

  • @clarity023 She literally accused a judge of "treason." She was penalized not merely for bringing frivolous lawsuits, but for abusing her position as an attorney and in the judge's own words being "woefully unprepared to practice the profession and at worst a menace to it."

  • Comment removed

  • @jedipauly Grow up. The Courts are as crooked as the politicians who put the crooked attorney Obama is power. McCain knows dam well that I am telling the truth. It is all about money. Rico Courts.

    Janet Napolitano and Barack Hussein Obama are influencing or threatening the judges.

    I know.

    They made records of me dead.

    HONEY SIEGAL DECEASED.

    We The People Against Corruption in the Campaign to Remove &Indict Obama et al day 181 Dec. 28/2010.

    Put Obama in Terry Lakin's place.

    Free Terry now

  • @HoneySiegalSurvivor

    Obama didn't put Lakin in jail he did that to himself!

  • @jedipauly You forget about the Indiana Court of Appeals that was decided on its merits and found lacking Pauly. If anything that would have been the one to appeal to a higher level, why is it Birthers have failed on that? But Pauly I'll remember next time I want advice on disarming a nuclear device I'll go straight to a lawyer just as you think as a "scientist" you are capable of interpreting constitutional law better than actual constitutional lawyers.

  • @clarity023 The Constitution created the recognition of the class of citizens known as Sovereign citizens & codified it as "nbC" first in Article II, long before the "nat born citizens" of soil jurisdiction where even invented under U.S. law, fool. Nat born citizens by soil or just a mom was not even recognized until many years after the adoption of the Constitution. Its not even possible that Article II is referring to soil or a mom nbc and a simple statute after the fact cant alter the Const.

  • @james0tucson I am expected to be a good American, be numbered and tracked by my 'servant government', and produce papers showing who I am on demand by 'Authorities' BECAUSE I AM INNOCENT, AND HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE. BHO has spent TWO MILLION DOLLARS to make sure WE don't see HIS PAPERS. And you say 'there is nothing more to discuss." YEAH - WITH YOU! Stop wasting your time with these Fed shills, Jedipauly.

  • @Psychictaxi How has he spent $2 million? He was only named as a respondent in a few cases and they were all dismissed in the very early stages.

    Costs don't start mounting until 'discovery' and trial, so where does this figure of $2 million come from? No one can ever tell me.

  • @Psychictaxi You birfers refuse to believe newspaper announcements, testimonies of Dr Fukino, director of the Health Dept in HI, and the Republican gov. of HI, Lingle , DNC, NSA,FBI and other agencies. The TWO MILLION as you posted is a lie, some birfers have been saying one million others $800,00 but offer NO evidence of that. Lakin is in jail for stupid, moron, he lost everything just for being a birfer. Birfers will never be satisfied. Obama is an eligible president. Deal with it.

  • @Psychictaxi

    Do you actually have a source for that ridiculous figure (two million dollars)?

    Or did you make it up?

  • @arrrogantlyignorant There was once an article that mentioned, in passing, the legal costs of the presidential campaign. (I'm sure they spent a lot on stuff like transportation, catering, and insurance too, it was among the largest companies in the USA for a while). Someone I believe either at WND or the Washington Times drew the connection between those costs and the presumed costs of fighting the birther movement. Nobody has ever been specific -- what cases were billed and for what exactly?

  • @james0tucson

    Exactly. Thanks for making my point. The only figures released were published by the FEC and represented total legal fees paid during a given time period for the campaign, election and transition. The figures did not reflect costs related solely to the eligibility issue. Wnd just spun it to make people think it did.

  • @Psychictaxi "BHO has spent TWO MILLION DOLLARS to make sure WE don't see HIS PAPERS. "

    You still whoring that fallacy around the internet? I realize that birthers don't have any actual facts to support their ridiculous premise, but at least try to use something that's relevant, and hasn't been completely debunked.

  • @james0tucson

    Obama never travelled from England there's overwhelming evidence he was born in Hawaii.

  • @clarity023 "Obama never travelled from England"

    Huh?

  • @james0tucson

    I know that,

  • @james0tucson Smoking a lot of crack when you post on youtube?

  • @helix1776dragon Whatever. Lakin is in prison and will be for a while. President Obama is President. Attacking me won't change any of that, you know. But if you want to attack me, at least be specific.

  • Lakin is a hero but I forgot that America is just too cool , too modern and too amazing to have heroes anymore.

  • @helix1776dragon A hero for what? Foolishly listening to a dog bite lawyer named Paul Jensen who had no experience in Constitutional or Military law while ignoring his actual military lawyers' advice? Lakin is kicking himself for not paying attention in the first place and he realizes he was completely wrong and mislead. What's heroic about destroying your career, hurting your family, losing your pension because you're too stubborn to pay attention when you're wrong?

  • So if Lakin had a chance for discovery it could embarrass the President. Yes a usurper of the constitution would be embarrassed if the truth came out. This president is illegal under the US Constitution and should be impeached. Those that helped Mr. Obama to keep this charade going should be prosecuted and put in jail for treason against the US Constitution.

  • @vpertoso It could be embarrassing. My full birth record would reveal a birth defect, a disease that my mother had, my father's occupation at the time, and the fact that my mother had a child before being married to my father. I would not approve of this information being made public. The birth certificate I have from my state carries no more information than the one Obama made public, which is still more than I would have published under any circumstances.

  • @james0tucson ---- Yes but YOU did not run for the presidency of the USA. Mr. Obama did. To be employed by the American People as president he must prove without question that he is a Natural Born citizen as the law required of every president who has held the office before him. Why should he be treated differently than all past presidents? Answer: Because he has something to hide from the American People. WHAT CAN BE SO HIDIOUS THAT HE GETS A PASS ON VIOLATING THE LAW.

  • @vpertoso Why should he be treated differently than all past presidents?

    Which of the past presidents showed you, personally, an original birth certificate?

    Which of them even made a facsimile of a birth certificate public?

    What law are you saying President Obama violated? Establish that, then you might ask why "he gets a pass."

  • @james0tucson -- The law is the Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution the supreme law of the land. When McCain was challenged concerning his eligibility the congress certified his eligibility. When Obama was challenged Congress did nothing. WHY was Obama privileged and McCain was not? Answer: Obama is not a Natural Born American Citizen because his father was not an American Citizen as is required by law. It is completly obvious when one reads the Constitution.

  • @vpertoso Obama hasn't been challenged in any meaningful sense. None of the civil actions related to eligibility has proceeded past the first hearing. President Obama has enjoyed no special privileges in this regard.

  • @james0tucson -- The courts are in collusion to suppress the truth because of the constitutional crises that would ensue. The courts tell the people that bring lawsuits that they have no standing or will not allow the evidence to be presented. Obama has not allowed the release of any of his personal information from birth to present. We the people of America cannot independently verify anything about Obama’s life. We have to take his word as to who he is and where he was born. Why should we?

  • @vpertoso The courts are in collusion to suppress the truth

    Ok, you're into conspiracy theory territory.

    You have the passport records, college transcripts, original birth certificates, etc. for either President Bush? 

  • @james0tucson -- Go to the Continental Congress 2009 web site and read the Articles of Freedom. FACT is No president has kept his personal records from the American press as this one has.  I do not support Bush but he and other presidents before Obama have not spend over $2 million to keep their records from the American public. That is a lot of money to spend. WHY DO IT?? Answer the question. It is intuitively obvious that there MUST be something Obama needs to hide.

  • @james0tucson Then explain how it is that the American people have no standing in their own courts regarding matters of the Constitution and the functioning of their own government?

  • @james0tucson How many President have ever been elected who did not have a citizen father? Answer ZERO. There has never been a President elected (after the sunset clause expired not including the original founders at the time of the adoption) who did not have a citizen father.

  • @vpertoso

    "To be employed by the American People as president he must prove without question that he is a Natural Born citizen"

    can you show me where that is written in the constitution?

    not that he has to be a NBC, but that he has to show proof without question.

    can you show me where the other presidents did that?

    can you show me what he has to hide? if you can not prove anything other than rumor then STFU.

    thank you for your time

  • @james0tucson Yes you have a birth defect alright. Its called mental retardation. How in the world can you not understand the simple proposition that "natural born Citizen" is referring to a SOVEREIGN American citizen at birth, and that sovereignty is a natural inherited political right that is declared in the Declaration of Independence to be a self evident truth that comes from males (citizen father)? The fact that u cannot understand this self evident truth must be due to your birth defect.

  • @vpertoso Technicality. You can't impeach a bogus President. You just arrest him and put him in jail for fraud and treason.

  • @vpertoso

    so how do you attest to the showing of his BC online and at factchech where is was verified and the HI dept of Health director making a public statement that it was on file and that he was born there?

    Lakin did not have a chance at discovery mainly because he is not entitled to it. the Judge already knows what will really happen. the embarrasment is that the President would have to then surrender his BC to everyone filed a suit in court once it was opened. thats lesson in law is free

  • @mightyone95 -- The military has taken an oath to defend the US Constitution because it cannot defend its self, therefore the military has the right to demand that a President show he meets the criteria set down in the Constitution. LTC Tery Lakin is the deffinition of a loyal officer true to his oath and defender of the Constitution. If the military does not care to know that the person who holds the office of President is LAWFUL than we are no longer a nation of laws but a nation of thugs.

  • Great vid. These people need to know the truth about the estate of Honey R. Siegal deceased created in Phoenix not far from where they are standing. Senator John McCain knows very well about the banking fraud which is causing the demise of the United States of America. The reason McCain did not step up to say Obama is not eligible to be president is related to this fraud. Senator Kyl's Office is next to the US Bank @ 2198 E. Camelback Rd. where the fraud began. Obama must be removed and indicted

  • Wow - you gubmint fokkers are good! I replied to comments from you ppl (?) and THEY WERE DELETED!!! How the hell does that happen to MY comments on MY Channel? You must be paid handsomely for selling us out...

  • @Psychictaxi AmTrust is owned by ? We The People Against Corruption in the Campaign to Remove and Indict Obama et al day 162 Thursday December 9/2010. The fraud funding of Obama started adjacent to Senator Kyl's Office next door at 2198 E. Camelback Rd. Firstar Bank now US Bank. Obama is a Bank One Bankster.

    Honey R. Siegal (not dead)

  • I applaud these citizens for their Patriotic efforts. I would like to point out, because there is much wrong information on "natural born Citizen", that most believe that it means you must have BOTH parents citizens (Orly Taitz, Mario Apuzzo, etc.) and born on U.S. soil or equiv. This is wrong. It only requires you to have a citizen father. Your mother and place of birth are irrelevant for Article II purposes. I have produced a written analysis that proves this if anyone wants it.

  • Looks like the same yokels from the American Grand Jury. Hopefully, Lakin will spend several years in jail and lose his retirement benefits.

  • @1940jan You are an obvious criminal and EVIL person. Any decent human being would not stand by and watch a mans life being destroyed or hope with glee that his life is destroyed (Terry Lakin) who is just following the laws of the military to determine the validity of his orders, when all it takes is for Obama to produce a simple piece of paper (his actual birth certificate not the BOGUS COLB) which would prove Lakin's innocence or guilt. You should be ashamed of yourself. U R not an American.

  • @jedipauly

    wow you really keep spreading the bullshit thick dont you

    a COLB is a BC. It is what it is called in Hawaii.

    but you seem to neglect to mention that fact

    it is as if someone claims a Georgia license from the DDS is not the equivalent to a New York DMV license.

  • @mightyone95 HAHA!!!! Talk about BULLSHIT!!! Do you really expect people to believe your insane drivel? Try taking that bogus piece of crap COLB to a DMV or BMV & try & get a drivers license with it. You will be bounced out of the office & laughed at. Better yet try & get a U.S. passport with a COLB and see what happens. You cannot even get a drivers license in Hawaii with a COLB. You are an IDIOT. A valid BC has a doctors signature and a time of birth etc which Obama's bogus COLB has none.

  • @jedipauly

    well since the Pres of the US has a Passport I would like to show you that you are wrong. and since he has a drivers license i would also show that you are wrong

    and since I have a BC from NY state with the equivalent information as Obama's HI COLB then I would again show that you are wrong since I got a passport with it, Joined the military with it, and got a drivers license with it. all with NO dr sig and NO time of birth.

    can you explain that to me?

    

  • @mightyone95 You have no idea how the false usurper and fraud obtained a passport. I don't believe you at all. If you have a BC from NY then I will bet it has the time of birth, your birth weight, and a doctors signature, and the hospitals name, and some finger prints or hand prints or foot prints like all legitimate birth certificates have. You are a LIAR and FRAUD. GO TO HELL YOU COMMUNIST ASSHOLE

  • @jedipauly

    wow. communist? where the heck did THAT come from?

    Im sorry I didnt realize that the only thing I could be if I do not agree with you is a communist, thank you so much for showing me that you are smarter than the rest of us uneducated bafoons.

    but no as a matter of fact, My BC does not have that information, on it, and It is accepted in more places than VISA credit card including the DMV, the state dept, and the military.

    so don't let your ignorance get the best of you

  • @jedipauly

    but lets get back to the bullshit ok

    it is public record that the republican Gov of HI says he was born in HI

    it is public record that the Dept of Health director came forth to say that his BC is on file and is in the vault.

    how do you know that Obama's father is Kenyan? have you seen his birth certificate. Obama senior could have been born in New Jersey for all you know, thus making your argument even more idiotic

  • @mightyone95 BUWAHAHAAH!!!!! Now we get to the truth that you are a liar and fraud. Obama himself has published a book about his father and Obama himself has told the world who his father is. It is well known and admitted over and over by Obama himself and his wife that his father was Kenyan and never was a U.S. citizen. You obviously have no clue what is going on.

  • @jedipauly

    sorry, you got NO truth, what you got was "baited" and just like a fish, you grabbed it and now i have you

    here's how

    you believe that Obama's telling the truth about his father's nationality even though you have seen NO (ZERO) EVIDENCE to confirm this.

    but... of course to you Obama is telling a lie about his own birth place. which has been confirmed by the HI state officials.

    do you see why this makes you a troll?

    thanks for making yourself look the fool for me.

  • @jedipauly Obama's "bogus COLB?"

    Are you prepared to sign your name to a sworn deposition declaring that you have personal knowledge that the COLB is a forgery? Are you an eyewitness to this forgery who can testify in a criminal case of forgery and fraud against one Chiyume Fukino, or whoever you witnessed committing this crime?

    Or would you say that there is in fact some possibility that the COLB is genuine?

  • @james0tucson Many document experts have already done just that. U R a fool. Listen up fool. By Hawaii's own laws it says that a COLB is given to children born outside of the country & you expect people to believe and accept that an internet COLB given to foreign born people is proof of Presidential qualifications? U R INSANE. If Obama is so legit then why would he make his 1st executive order to seal up all of his records & past history? Not the actions of a legitimate person. He is a FRAUD

  • @jedipauly Document experts? The State of Hawaii has the final say on the matter of certification. The document stopped being relevant when the state confirmed the information it conveyed.

    Can you prove that Obama's COLB was given to him after he was born outside the country, or can't you?

    I am insane? Are you a mental health care practitioner as well as a constitutional lawyer?

  • @james0tucson Your arguments are as irrelevant as they are illogical. It makes no difference where you are born because your place of birth has nothing at all to do with Article II qualifications. It means you must be born as a sovereign native of the country which just means a citizen dad. I would like to see you go to the DMV and apply for a drivers license and when they ask you for a BC u just tell them that ur COLB is posted on the internet. BUWAHAHA they will laugh you out of the office.

  • @jedipauly Nobody used an internet image to get a drivers license, speaking of illogic and irrelevance.

    I'd like to know how your "citizenship is a jus sanguinis function of the fater" would pass Equal Protection muster.

    Question for you: Is Marco Rubio eligible to the Office of President? How about Bobby Jindal?

  • @james0tucson Obama uses an internet electronic image of a COLB to try & convince of his legitimacy for Pres but if u go to a BMV or try & get a passport & try & use an internet image of a COLB u will be laughed out of the office. An internet image of a COLB is not a valid legal identifying document that is accepted anywhere but u expect the people to accept this bogus crap as proof of what exactly? That he was born in Hawaii? So what? ur place of birth is irrelevant for Article II purposes.

  • @jedipauly This is relevant only if you are the DMV agent and he is using an internet image to get a drivers license, or if you are an agent of the State Department and he is using an internet image to get a passport. But this is not the case, so your example makes no sense. Obviously if there was a question about his age or birthplace, evidence would include a document and not an internet image. You have not made a case that demands such evidence. You have only conjecture!

  • @jedipauly

    can you show me where in the constituition of the United States where it says a Presidential candidate must show a long form birth certificate? can you show me ANY written law during ANY time in US history where a long form BC must be shown?

    can you show me where a COLB is excluded?

    if not then STFU

  • @mightyone95 I don't give a shit about the birth certificate. The COLB is just fine with me bcs it proves that Obama is not qualified. He is a FRAUD & usurper. Can you show me in the Constitution where it says that the office of President is to be filled with foreign sovereign citizens who are born to foreign sovereign citizen fathers? Show me where it says in the Constitution that foreign fathers can create sovereign American citizens who can be President. If not then STFU commie bastard.

  • @mightyone95 Listen moron, Obama's father was Kenyan so Barack was born a Kenyan national at birth no matter who his mother was or where he was born. His citizenship was governed by a foreign country. Article II "natural born Citizen" means a native of America fool not of Kenya or Britain. Talk about STUPID you take the prize.

  • @jedipauly

    thats right I must be the moron. so are the 535 members of congress who unanimously confirmed him (about a 3rd of them lawyers) the 50 secretaries of state who approved him. the cheif justice of the supreme court who swore him in.

    apparantly the supreme court justices know less about the Constitution than you. wow why arent you on the supreme court then?

  • @mightyone95 HAHAHAAHA!!!!! What a FOOL you are. There is no point in even responding to you. You are such an idiot to trust your government and to think that Congress gives a shit about you or the Constitution.

    "apparantly the supreme court justices know less about the Constitution than you."

    You have got that right. But, how would you know since they have never adjudicated this issue? You just keep digging yourself deeper into the realm of idiocy.

  • @jedipauly

    you would reather say "What a FOOL you are. There is no point in even responding to you", than to answer my simple questions.

    that's Ironic since I am sure that is the exact thing Obama says to birthers who ask for his Birth certificate.

  • @mightyone95 You are the "birther", idiot, because you believe that being born on the soil qualifies one for the office of President. That makes YOU THE BIRTHER. I am a TRUTHER one who espouses the TRUTH that "natural born Citizen" means a sovereign American male. Sovereignty is a natural inherited political right (try reading the Declaration of Independ.) that only comes from a sovereign citizen father. You cannot even get the "birther" thing right. What a moron.

  • @jedipauly So he had dual citizenship at birth. Of what countries was he a citizen at birth? Was one of those countries the United States? Then he is a citizen of the United States at birth, not by naturalization. And that is high on the long list of reasons why all birther arguments fail.

  • @james0tucson NO, in fact a citizen at birth due to soil or ur mom IS A NATURALIZED CITIZEN. You dont even know what u are saying. By ur logic the founders intended any foreign male 2b able to create children who could be President of the U.S. Do you really expect people to believe that lunacy? By ur logic, females would also qualify yet females did not even have any voting rights for almost 150 years after the Constitution was adopted and nbC did not include females. So much for your theory.

  • @jedipauly

    and by YOUR logic females would not be elligible to be President because they had no right to vote,(which is true) but the constitution says no such thing so they would in fact be since there is no such stipulation in the constitution

    hmmm. are you reaching a bit?

  • @mightyone95 In fact the Const didnt provide for females at all & there was no political rights for females until the 19th Amend. That is what the SC said in Minor v Happersett. We didnt even have a female candidate for pres until almost 100 years after the Constitution. It was never intended for females to be Pres fool. Next you will be telling us that when the Declaration of Independence said it is a self evident truth that governments are instituted among "Men" they meant females? BWUHAHAH

  • @jedipauly You dont even know what u are saying.

    I understand this issue quite well. Fortunately or unfortunately for you, I am not the person you need to persuade. I don't understand where you are getting all these inferences about "my logic".

    You're not a "COLB is forged" birther, you are a "dual citizenship is disqualifying" birther. That premise has already been rejected, and you have done nothing to give it any credence.

  • @james0tucson You don't understand shit. You are the "birther" because you believe that being born on U.S. soil somehow makes you a native of America which it does not. Only a citizen father makes you a native of your fathers country. You Obots are full of shit with no law or logic that hold up or can convince anyone but the most brain dead zombies. You have no understanding of history or law or sovereignty etc. You are obviously a paid communist agent and criminal. You are a FOOL.

  • @jedipauly

    You don't understand shit.

    Ok, whatever. Here's the difference between my position and yours: I don't have to be right, wrong, or indifferent. I don't have to do or say one single thing, and President Obama will continue to hold office for the remainder of his term, and if he runs for re-election will have a decent shot at another term.

    On the other hand, to get YOUR way, you need to come up with some evidence which you lack, and a valid argument, which you also lack.

  • @james0tucson My arguments are totally valid & fully supported by ALL OF THE EVIDENCE. U R just way too stupid to see it or understand. It is YOU that has no valid argument or evidence other than the defacto illegal occupation and criminal conspiracy that keeps this fraud occupying the peoples office of President. One day you will be forced to accept the truth as history and the truth will role over you Obots and Obama and all those criminal frauds that are supporting his overthrow of the gov.

  • @jedipauly I understand that you have difficulty persuading others to adopt your point of view. I understand that the reason you have this difficulty is that you have no evidence to support your conclusions. I also understand that you can hardly make a statement without making a personal insult.

  • @james0tucson Lets be clear. Its Obots who make the personal attacks bcs the truth isnt in ur reason so u must attack the messenger. I didnt start with personal attacks. I was attacked & called stupid first. Ur OPINION that I have no evidence to support my case is false. I have all the evidence in the world on my side. It is U that has no evidence. If you want a serious debate without personal attacks then I will be happy to educate you with all the evidence that proves my case & u 2b wrong.

  • @jedipauly I didnt start with personal attacks. I was attacked & called stupid first.

    No. I never insulted you or anyone else in this forum. You insulted me, called me names, and called my mental health into question.

  • Comment removed

  • @james0tucson I don't believe that u are open to learning the truth because u are so certain that you are right when it is so very easy to prove that you are wrong. If you are mature enough to actually give me the opportunity to show you the evidence and rebut your bogus position then you will learn that I am telling the truth and all of the evidence supports my position and not yours. I don't think you are mature enough to accept reality when it is proven to you that your beliefs are wrong.

  • @mightyone95 They somehow ignore the obvious word "CERTIFICATE" on the document. They also fail to understand that they need very stong evidence before they can even argue against the prima facie case presented by this certification. The "certification" is not merely "the document" by the way. The "certification" is the whole of the position of the state government on these facts, of which the document is merely evidence.

  • @james0tucson birthers have argued with me that "certificaTION" does not have a equavalency as a "certifiCATE"

    then they come with these idiotic and elaborate circumstances like Jedipauly who can argue all the nonsense he wont but cannnot answer the simplest questions regarding his beliefs. instead of answering he says "What a FOOL you are. There is no point in even responding to you." because he cant come up with an answer

  • @james0tucson The only prima facie case presented by the COLB is that it is prima facie evidence of FRAUD. The "Certification" only certifies that a birth occurred and that is all, you dumbshit.. So what? It does not even come close to meeting Article II requirements because it actually proves that Obama did not have a citizen father which automatically disqualifies him and proves he is a fraud and usurper criminal. That is what the "prima facie" case is due to the COLB. You are a MORON.

  • @jedipauly So then you are saying that the birth certificate is irrelevant, and that there is a second class of citizen by birth. No court and no legislative body agrees with you. Why do you suppose that is the case?

  • @james0tucson Every Court and legislative body agrees with me. You have no clue what you are talking about. There is not one piece of legislation or one court decision that runs against what I am telling you. They ALL SUPPORT the truth that I am telling you that "natural born Citizen" means a sovereign male citizen who is created by birth inheritance which, by natural law jurisdiction and common custom, means one who is crated by a citizen father. Later females were added with the 19th Amend.

  • @jedipauly Every Court and legislative body agrees with me.

    Well then, that settles it. I didn't realize that Apuzzo won. I'm sure this means Lakin will be exonerated too. Congratulations.

  • @james0tucson Apuzzo never had his case adjudicated on the merits. His cases were all dismissed on jurisdictional grounds just like all of the cases so far. By the way, I have instructed Mario that his position is wrong bcs ur mother & place of birth are irrelevant for Article II purposes. He is MY STUDENT. I will be happy to show u emails between me & Mario where I prove his case to be wrong. The only thing he is correct on is that Obama cant qualify. Read my articles at jedipaulydotcom