Why the Economy is Messed Up - SHort Explanation - Obama and Bush are the same

[ThePlatoon4]

meh, i dont really care much, i always end up rich in the end no matter what happens :P

[hashimotto]

AAAwwwww, you are so pretty. You look like a beauty queen. Do you have a boy friend. What is your name baby? OMG its a fucking dude. EEEwwwwww, thu thu thu

[1smokeNMirrors]

3. The pope does govern a group of people... I merely need to confirm who, I also merely need to know why all nationalities , all types of religions, the majority of countries...all come to visit THIS POPE.....so tell me again...who does the POPE govern? LOL...time will tell won't it...

[1smokeNMirrors]

2. They need to visit the pope from their personal salaries if they merely want to go visit the pope...not on the american dime. Please share with us if you know why they went, because I can't recall why, and why don't they visit other type of churches? Special interest perhaps...if so, I merely want to know what is that interest.

[1smokeNMirrors]

2. Liquid please read and search the website that is called MODERN MONEY MECHANICS. The banks never gave you any money because the American people does not how our monetary system work...they become victims. The design it to collapse the current system so that you can walk right into the concentration camps willingly for FOOD and SHELTER.

[1smokeNMirrors]

THERE IS NOOOOOOOOOOO one in there that is honest. If they were a honest one in there, they would tell the American people what the others are doing. So tell me again who is honest in there? Stop putting your money in their BANKS ...stop using their money if you know they are robbing you blind. See liquid we are the ones that FEED THIS BEAST...so who is the blame? THE PEOPLE. Stop feeding the BEAST and it will DIE.

[RodneyWilliams25]

hmmmm....

[ssstormfuhrer]

the only twos to get it up just have everything thats us made is made in us that gives jobs wich people need and the other one is total war a world war which is gonna happen

[Tinyjb0]

HOLY FUCK! I thought u were a woman at the begining of this vid!! Cut your hair man!!

[IFloridaMotocrossI]

It's hilarious that you comment about government involvement being a serious problem, yet you praise Kucinich - a Progressive that promotes Single Payer.

[LiquidSmooth]

@IFloridaMotocrossI

I'm not big on Kucinich. Better than most other democrats.

I'm not really a fan of hardly any politicians. I'm sure I said good about Traficant too before. I think it would have made more sense for democrats who wanted change to support Kucinich. But I think there is plenty to dislike about him. I don't believe Kucinich understands any true foundation of AMerica.

[LiquidSmooth]

@LiquidSmooth I kind of throw him in with the likes of ROn Paul, but a little lower. I'm not quite sold on Ron Paul really being the constitutionalist people think he is.

[IFloridaMotocrossI]

I don't think you understand the foundation of America.

Everyone seems to share their views with the Founding Fathers and the Constitution, among other "foundations" of the US. The way I see it, either people are projecting their ideology onto aspects that have a positive social stigma, or the Founders had multi-personality disorder.

In case you didn't know, the foundation of America involved slavery, racism, sexism, and manifest destiny. Sometimes it's good to move on from the past, eh?

[LiquidSmooth]

@IFloridaMotocrossI

Oh I understand the foundation. Even when I was NEw Age and Athiest, I still looked at things unemotionally and even though I didn't like America being a CHristian Nation, I felt like it was the logical deduction.

[LiquidSmooth]

@LiquidSmooth (cont2)

THe original draft of the Declaration of Indepedence had a stipulation against slavery. I'm america indian and I understand why some christians misinterpreted the bible concerning "racial mixing".

But even at the founding, there were still plenty of christians that believed we all came from Adam and are one race. I think many of them decided to compromise on certain issues, hoping that later, free speech and education would help lead to change.

[LiquidSmooth]

@LiquidSmooth (cont3)

If you notice, it was mainly the Catholic Church that seemed to keep the slavery issue going. Taney who ruled in favor to extend slavery, was a roman catholic. Bishop Hughes (catholic) helped rid public schools of the Bible, the same Bible that teaches racism is wrong. Jefferson Davis was like a Bush of his day, saying publically he is protestant, but actually was a catholic.

[LiquidSmooth]

@LiquidSmooth (cont4)

THis is the same Roman Catholic Church which we were trying to escape from in England, and a reason why why put the "freedom of religion" clause in the constitution, so christians would no longer be burnt at the stake just cause they were of a different denomination.

[LiquidSmooth]

@LiquidSmooth (cont5)

Only in America are people dumb enough to say what is clearly a christian nation, isn't one.

If I went to most middle east countries, I would not dare say it isn't a muslim nation and that the Koran has nothing to do with legistlation. You can clearly see their laws and principles are tied back to the Koran.

[LiquidSmooth]

@LiquidSmooth (cont6)

As an athiest/New ager, I might have not liked certain facts, but I remained logical and accepted them until i could think of a way to change things.

Trouble was, in athiesm, how does one find a foundation to make morality law? Where is the foundation for right and wrong? Just because something works contrary to a goal of living, does that mean it is wrong? Especially if i believe life is an accident. There is no right or wrong in an accident

[LiquidSmooth]

@LiquidSmooth (cont6)

So in my athiesm, i decided it was best to be thankful that I lived someplace where people believed this God of the Bible was real or was at least willing to accept His laws. Cause I could at least live in a place with some sort of order. And I wa seven content to let the bible be the basis to argue legistlation on. Cause If athiesm was that basis, then you could make laws that it was ok for certain people to steal, like politicians.

[IFloridaMotocrossI]

Logical deduction?

"As the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion"

From Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli, 1797. Unanimously ratified by the US senate and signed by president John Adams.

Just because the majority of current US population is Christian, that doesn't mean the Founders were. The Founders were actually mostly deistic, agnostic, atheistic, and ALL secularists.

[LiquidSmooth]

@IFloridaMotocrossI

Wow, trying to use the Treaty of Tripoli sort of reveals how weak your arguement is cause it reveals you weak understanding of the language.

You deceptively dont even finish the quote.

"as it has an inherant hostility toward the muslim religion". Basically it was telling the Muslims "we are not THAT kind of a christian nation." THAT bieng like Spain Portugal, Italy

[LiquidSmooth]

(cont 2)

You have to remember, the crusades happened not that long ago. In fact, things like St Bartholemew's Massacre in which Catho9lics who some consider christian, had just killed a bunch of Protestants. This was the fear of the Muslim nations. SO basically it was telling them we are not THAT kind of christian nation.

In the Holy Trinity vs USA case, the supreme court ruled we are indeed a christian nation.

[IFloridaMotocrossI]

That's not what the quote says....

You need to look it up.

The Treaty was formulated to assert that the United States is NOT a religious power, by any means. The Treaty was a response to Muslim fear that the United States would govern by religious doctrine.

It is clear in the Constitution that the US is a secular state, and by no means a Christian nation. The Treaty of Tripoli just further reinforced that notion. That's why I listed the quote.

[1smokeNMirrors]

@IFloridaMotocrossI - I have a question for you. If what you say is true and I am not saying that it is not can you explain why the last two presidents visited the pope? The vatican is a STATE outside of Rome itself, so is this the reason? If they are going to separate church and state...why would our president deal with the POPE? Who does the vatican state govern? I never heard anyone said they live in the state of vatican. So if they don't govern a body of people, to bring forth the

[1smokeNMirrors]

2. @IFloridaMotocrossI - the interest of the people, who's interest than is being considered in that state? The pope/vatican interest correct? But vatican is a church organization....where is the separation than?

[LiquidSmooth]

@1smokeNMirrors good points

[IFloridaMotocrossI]

@1smokeNMirrors

The 1st Amendment doesn't say that public officials can't visit a church; it says that facilitate religion cannot be established by Congress.

[1smokeNMirrors]

@IFloridaMotocrossI -you are correct but I also know public officials within the united states always have a reason to do what they do or visit whom they visit. At this time it is unclear as to why the last two presidents visited the pope. What interest does the policitians have who spend the American tax dollar to go visit the pope...it had better be for business. So that brings me back to the first question. Why did the last two president visit the pope on american tax dollars?

[1smokeNMirrors]

@IFloridaMotocrossI -you are correct but I also know public officials within the united states always have a reason to do what they do or visit whom they visit. At this time it is unclear as to why the last two presidents visited the pope. What interest does the policitians have who spend the American tax dollar to go visit the pope...it had better be for business. So that brings me back to the first question. Why did the last two president visit the pope on american tax dollars?

[IFloridaMotocrossI]

@1smokeNMirrors

Diplomacy? To rally support from the Catholics? To set in motion the one-world-government-police-st­ate? I don't know.

[1smokeNMirrors]

@IFloridaMotocrossI - I live in North America and I will not assume you are american unless you choose to share that information...so if any American that knows why the last two presidents visited the pope please respond, because I don't know and if they went on TAX dollars...this is something we should know correct? Case and Point. If someone can pull their head away from E news for a few minutes and answer this very impertive question will greatly appreciated

[crazycoyotie]

yelp you're right

[bulkfull]

good vid. I disagree on the gold stand.

[icemanguitar]

shit

[dopehousex3]

Dude you look like a vampire lol.

[KevZen2000]

The healthcare reform is not for the benefit of the American people. If the bill is passed, healthcare will never be the same.

[LiquidSmooth]

If any kind of bill like that is passed, even a greatly watered down version, it will eventually be a great harm.

Once government gets involved at all, involvement will only increase.

Also, government healthcare paves the way for population control, not only the size, but who in that population they deem worthy of healthcare and living and who is not. Cause the services eventually get rationed. Or they may claim to "privatize" it and then the GOVERNMENT chooses your insurer.

[RestrainedNoMore]

excellent points and agree that Bush and Obama are one in the same (and so was Clinton and Bush1) all controlled by the same folks.

great info on the sidebar as well

Thanks for your work!

[LiquidSmooth]

Thanks for commenting :D

I see this video sitting in my upload section and keep thinking "Geez, i am kind of ashamed of that one, i hardly knew anything and it wasnt well done."

But i haven't read the sidebar in a while. I was surprised i wrote that well. I guess the sidebar bails me out a bit. LOL

I plan on doing better ones soon. I'm trying to finish 4 books first. But it seems like whenever i think i'm seeing the end, i find 3 more books i think i should read first. So who knows when

[LiquidSmooth]

I believe it extends to other nations and this is why the Cap and Trade is being worked on in Congress right now. I think the current system is about to collapse. And perhaps a world wide, "carbon credit" system will replace the one now. Become a global currency. Because if only the USA does cap and trade, then businesses may simply leave to go to countries without greeen house gas legistlation and laws.

In the Bible, God had his people conquer a nation by usury.

[happyness01]

Was going to criticise if a long haired, hippy looking guy was not talking anything less than an economist's point of view, but the basis of your point is key on. Pity the US government is not willing to deal with this key issue. Kinda like slavery in this day and age is economic slavery. This issue then extends to other nations.

[darkelfjst]

I don't know of any Democrats that are decent, save maybe 3. I know of NO Republicans that are uncorrupted save one. Ron Paul Obviously.

..your high aren't you? Your eyes are not focused and they are red... Common man, your 30 like me. You have a good head on your shoulders if you don't smoke it off. I'd love to hear you sober on these issues.

[LiquidSmooth]

Actually, i read alot. I study alot. I don't do drugs. I don't even drink.

I work 50 hours a week, I DJ which i work on like 20 hours a week, I read about a book a week. Read several articles on websites to probably fill up 2 books a week at least. I spend hours researching various subjects.

I was a little exhausted.

I basically made this video, having little sleep. When i get a new one made i'm gonna take this down probably.

[LiquidSmooth]

About Obama having Pharm buddies.I dont like just state something without throwing a fact out to back it up:

In a March 9 article on Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) February 2005 purchase of stock in AVI Biopharma and SkyTerra Communications, whose investors included donors to his 2004 Senate campaign, the Chicago Tribune reported that "two weeks after Obama purchased" stock in AVI, which was working on an avian influenza drug, "he introduced legislation to increase funding to combat the virus."

[LiquidSmooth]

I would like to add, most of these dealings though, they probably are not gonna be out in the open.

Heck, maybe some politician will buy stock, and take a loss (on purpose) just to make it seem like they are actually honest.

These people have went to years of college. Met all kinds of intellectuals. They know good and well, these schemes are unconstitutional.

It isn't rocket science the Federal Reserve and these bailouts are bad. Obama and Bush both knew it.

They are just EVIL

[LiquidSmooth]

It can work that way. My basic point was that money is debt.

Yes these banks can and do loan out more money, once paid back.

But the main point is, let's say, if there is only a trillion in circulation. Banks loan this out. It is loaned at interest. EVen if it is just 10% interest. Where does this extra 100billion come from to pay the interest off?

So debt cannot be paid off. Even if someone pays off their loan, it isnt like there is enough money for EVERYONE to pay off their loan.

[LiquidSmooth]

I plan on doing a video to try and explain this whole pyramid scheme that is going on with the Federal Reserve. This was just something quick i did. trying to figure out how to illustrate it with graphics so most people can understand what i am saying more precisely, and i'd like to add a little bit of historical and constituional facts to it. The people who own the Private Federal Reserve are the 1st and at the top of this pyramid scheme. But you aren't gonna do so well getting into Amway now.

[robenel]

you may be right. however, just wondering by your example if there's 1 trillion dollars loaned out, and 150 billion payed back in one year, then won't the banks loan out another 150 billion, so you owe 1 trillion, and somebody else gets 150 billion?