Added: 4 months ago
From: TheYoungTurks
Views: 76,002
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3,116)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • does anyone noticed his third eye?

  • Has O'Reilly ever heard of the Sunni's and the Shi'ites in the middle east? They are both religious and they HATE each other. Muslims hate Jews. All of these are religious groups, right?

  • Dawkins actually says in a documentary that the believers in a religion are stupid

  • @tigersforchrist

    "only a REAL FOOL would believe there is no god." If that is true, than why are the IQ scores of atheists higher on average?

  • this is brilliant, this video had all the ingredients needed for entertainment. two comedians would struggle to write this. there are some things to thank fox for. though not many

  • All true. However, many can argue that Hitler used Christianity as an excuse to hide is real initiative.

  • Just gotta love that guy's "what the flying fuck?"-face when Bill O'Reilly says "You can't explain that" xD

  • wow he conceded that buddhism is good without being choked out

  • This o'reilly man is an utter utter MORON!!!!!!!!

  • Bread goes in, Toast comes out. You can't explain that.

  • they must have paid Dawkins a LOT of money to appear on this show...

  • Do not Kill, America commits judicial murder several times a year when it joins company with authoritarian regimes around the world(and some atheists lol) by executing convicted criminals. What a barbaric country.

  • Thats rich, O'reilly advocating empany and compassion and the golden rule. wow what a self- blindsighted and terribly illogical debater.

  • How could dumbass oreilley ever hope to contend with Dawkins who is a brilliantly educated Oxonian don. O' Reilly ? did he even attend university?

  • its amazing how religious people tell you what to think, then when you dont believe them they tell everyone else what you think...how can a christian tell people what an atheist thinks it isnt possible since atheist dont believe in dogma

  • Bill O'Reilly is an embarrassment to Americans.

  • @tomhetistgut3 Most Americans are an embarrassment to Americans.

  • @DisposableTeenIn1984 As an American, unfortunately I agree with you 100%.

  • @tomhetistgut3 You kind of have to if you're one of the few intelligent Americans out there; I live there and pretty much everyone but me is borderline illiterate and I'm a 13 year old girl.

  • If he would let Mr. Dawkins talk there might actually be a debate!

  • @penelopie508 YOU'RE PROVING ME WRONG SO I'M GOING TO TALK OVER YOU! >_<

  • I think what Bill O'Reilly was trying to say at the end for the translation of how it helps is this. If you do not understand how something works, look to the bible because it explains it there by saying that God simply wanted it to be that way.

  • It is crazy how you have the strongly religious people using Atheism as if it is a set of beliefs just like it is for any religion.  What exactly in Atheism did those dictators use as justification for any of the people they killed? You find it all over the place in religions coming out of the middle east.

  • Comment removed

  • Bill O'Reilly is proof that any idiot can have a talk show.

  • He really was mocking god. But then again you teach religion to young kids. So both wrong. Let people grow before letting them choose their beliefs

  • if you do good stuff so you wont get punished after death thats not doing good stuff thats pretty selfish

  • Tide goes in, tide goes out.

    YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN THAT

  • "Derp,derp, sun goes up, sun goes down, you can't explain that!" Hehe, Bill O'Reilly, also known as "The Retarded Talk Show Host." : )

  • I'm glad Americans also have programmes like this alongside Fox "news" and the evangelical channel etc.

  • Pol pot, Joseph Stalin and Mao Tung were vegetarians, therefore, all vegetarians are evil... WTF?

  • @NormacHC Don't forget Hitler.

  • Comment removed

  • @NormacHC hitler was vegetarian also haha

  • @Raphinater He especially liked orange Jews ;)

  • @neurotyrant very fucked up, but clever nonetheless

  • @NormacHC They were egotistical which was what influenced their atrocities.

  • @NormacHC

    its not the vegetarianism, it is the mustaches.

  • @NormacHC So was Adolph Hitler lol seeing a pattern here.

  • @NormacHC dont forget hitler :) ps im a vegitarian

  • @NormacHC Use that same logic when Atheists criticize Christianity as evil. 

  • @NormacHC Don't forget Hitler vas a vegetarian and a huge animal lover.

  • Comment removed

  • who the hell wrote the subtitles for this?

  • WHICH ONE IS MORE MORAL? FOOTBALL OR BASKETBALL!? WE'LL I SAY THAT IS THE POINT. IF MORALITY IS ROOTED AT HUMAN INVENTION, BREAKING LAWS SUCH AS THOUGH SHALL NOT COVET YOUR NEIGHBOR, WILL MERELY BE THE SAME AS TRAVELING FOUL OR A FOUL IN FOOTBALL. ROFL DON'T KNOW ABOUT FOOTBALL BUT FAIL ARGUMENT DIRTY OLD TURKS!

  • Dawkins: "are you talking about the origin of life'

    Oreiley: "im talking about the origin of existence, plant existence, animal existence"

    So in other words you are talking about the Origin of Life dumbass!!!

  • The Young Turks was the name of a Turkish Fascist group which committed the Armenian Genocide in which 1.5 million Armenians were exterminated. This is no different from having a show called "The Nazis".

  • You atheists have believed prehaps the greatest lie ever foisted upon man. I Dare any of you "educated" people to read, in it's entirety Micheal Behe's book, Irreducible Complexity: The Challenge to the Darwinian Evolutionary Explanations of many Biochemical Structures

    "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."

    --Charles Darwin, Origin of Species.

  • @AtheismKills actually, Richard Dawkins classes himself and a social democrat and admits to have never voted Conservative. In addition to this, I think it's important you consider the fact that most religious people are right wing conservatives, so your argument for him wanting to increase the gap between rich and poor accounting for his atheistic views, is utterly flawed. Good day.

  • @LaylaD101 It depends how you define political beliefs. You think that everyone to the left of Joseph Stalin is a "right wing conservative". Religious people have morals, we think its wrong to murder babies, run around naked or sell crack to children. If that makes me right wing so be it. But religion clearly condemns racism and extreme nationalism. If religious people like Michael Moore, JFK, MLK, Ghandi, Mother Theresa, etc. are "right wing conservatives" then so am I.

  • @AtheismKills Did I say I thought that? no. Athiest people have morals also, and the notion that we don't think murdering babies, running around naked or selling crack to children is wrong as well, is completely inane. It also doesn't make you right wing. You clearly have no logical grip on political ideology or understanding of the political spectrum if you think that because you condemn those things, it makes you right wing.

  • @LaylaD101 Atheists that have morals get them from religion. The political spectrum is a one-dimensional fraud. I refuse to re-define my political views to fit a contrived one-dimensional falsehood perpetuated by careerist demagogues.

  • @AtheismKills Yep, uh huh, sure. You go on living life in a denial, with the blinders on. I'm a good person because I treat others how I'd like to be treated, it has nothing to do with religion. Not selling crack to babies isn't in the bible anyway...

    It all comes down to me being the type of person who'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance and you, on the other hand, taking the awe of ignorance route in life. Have fun with that.

  • @AtheismKills what the hell are you talking about, what morals did we get from religion, stoning people because they broke the sabbath, slavery, killing people because they believe in different gods? what morals are you talking about, we evolved with morals because nothing would work if we just started killing eachother

  • @LazaCDS Your exactly right. @AtheismKills has no idea what they are talking about. Another person blinded by religion.

  • @LazaCDS Its always taking the same things out of context isn't it? Those were specific punishments at a particular place and time. They were probably never literally carried out. It may be referring to death of the soul or even of the community. Try reading what Jesus said.

  • @AtheismKills jesus said that he is not here to ban the laws of the old testament, and they were cariied out, try reading your holy book, moses sentenced people to stoning to death for collecting sticks on the sabbath

  • @LazaCDS Moses was trying to hold together a tired and hungry tribe of refugees who were under attack from hostile neighbouring tribes. It was necessary at the time and reflected a spiritual reality. Jesus may not have disowned those books but He didn't carry out any similar punishments. On the contrary, He healed people on the sabbath and taught forgiveness.

  • @AtheismKills there is no evidence of him healing anyone, and he wasnt against slavery and all that, why would your god create all other galaxies black holes and planets when we dont need them, why would he create animals with better eyes, better ears, longer life, why would he put water on mars and other planets when no one is there?

  • @LazaCDS In the Bible which is believed Christians, Jesus healed people. Happy now? He also came set the slaves free. The NT says there is no difference between slave and free but all are equal in Christ. By your standard, there's no evidence of Moses sentencing anyone to do death. You can't have it both ways. As for your questions, I have no idea. Maybe God wants us to colonize space. Or maybe He just let evolution take place. It sounds like you're looking for excuses ;-)

  • @AtheismKills i said that if you believe in christ believe in the moses story too, thats all ;)

  • @AtheismKills

    it also says in the new testament that slaves should obey their masters and its ok to beat them as long as they dont die

    now thats freedom

  • @Dreamerx47 No no, it's okay EVEN if they die so long as it takes a day or two becuz then it's not your fault.

    What a laugh!

  • @Dreamerx47 Even though the Bible is called the word of God, it's not. It was written by men, not God nor Jesus. The New Testament was written by some of Jesus's followers. So of course they would throw their own opinions in here and there. And to improve upon that point, when the Bible was written, slavery was a common thing. Many people had slaves. Barely anyone frowned upon it in the BC era. Slavery has only recently become something to be frowned upon.

  • @LazaCDS

    God was bored and needed to fool all of us by making us think we are not alone LOL, you funny god

  • @AtheismKills Morality is simply a survival mechanism the same as the fear of heights - evolution has favoured creatures who feel that it's bad to hurt and kill each other the same as it has favoured those who feel fear of heights or disgust at certain toxic substaces. Altruism can help a species to evolve, and morality is simply a very sophisticated and rationalised set of instinctual behavioural mechanisms. Morality does not come from religion. It comes from natural selection.

  • @AstronomyGuru84 natural selection is real but it is completely amoral. It is simply a blind process and does not select for morality. For instance, a rapist could potentially rape hundreds of women if he were not caught. Assume that some of his victims who fell pregnant either choose not to, or are unable to have an abortion. The rapist could father many times more children than the man who marries one wife and remains faithful to her. This is just one example.

  • @AtheismKills Both rapists and killers have physiological problems. Other animals rape and kill each other, it does occur in nature. That does not mean that morality is not a product of natural selection. Evolution does not mean a better product after all. With humanism and a mutual morality we can better ourselves. Now for the sake of argument let’s say that morality comes from a god. Does this mean that a person who does believe in god will not murder or rape?

  • @AstronomyGuru84 Not sure if you meant physiological or psychological problems. I don't believe it could be physiological so I'll assume you meant psychological. Psychology is quite a controversial field with conflicting theories. Just because a psychologist claims someone has problems because they are not following the 'herd morality' doesn't make it true. Humanism and a mutual morality are merely human opinions and there is no more need to follow them than to follow religion.

  • @AtheismKills "Atheism Kills"? Then why do the least religious countries in the world also have the lowest crime rates and murder rates? Seems pretty safe to live in Scandinavia or Japan for instance, much safer than in for instance the USA..: )

  • @winterstellar "Seems pretty safe to live in Scandinavia or Japan for instance" - You haven't watched the news in the last year have you? Fukushima nuclear plant meltdown + Anders Brehvik mass murderer. Scandinavia and Japan have the highest suicide rates in the world.

  • @AtheismKills No, the suicide thing is just a myth, it's just an old myth. The scandinavian countries are actually all at the top of the "happiest countries" rankings. And that scizophrenic murderer was a christian, like very many other scizophrenics, people with voices in their heads. He will not be leaving the mental hospital,and if there are other tards like him they will not have the opportunity to buy anfo-bomb chemicals there anymore either

  • @AstronomyGuru84 Now why would we wish to have humanism and a mutual morality? People imposing such views are no different from people imposing religion. What if I reject your 'mutual morality'? Why would I do this? Well, perhaps I am a nihilist who believes that life is meaningless (the only rational conclusion if one is an atheist). If I consider my own life worthless, I will feel I have nothing to lose in harming you. And why would we want to better ourselves? CONT...

  • @AstronomyGuru84 3. What would we 'better ourselves' towards? From where do we get our concepts of what is better? If we reject God, surely it is only other people's opinion that says what is 'better', whoever shouts the loudest. As to your final point, no! Plenty of theists have done just that unfortunately. But theists who do that are acting against their religion, whereas you & atheist friends of mine are made in the image of God & retain morals created by Him.

  • @AtheismKills Lastly, perhaps you should consider the simple fact that 75% of Americans are God-fearing Christians & 74% of prisoners are God-fearing Christians whils 10% of Americans are atheists and 0.2% of prisoners are atheists.

  • Comment removed

  • Dawkins is happy debate an idiot like O'Reilly over and over again. Pity he was scared to debate William Lane Craig. Keep running Dawkins.

  • @AtheismKills will craig give some evidence for jesus? no. dawkins has evidence for the things he talks about, christians have no evidence for their faith, your god is just 1 of thousands of other imaganary gods, look at science and evidence forget about fairytales

  • Comment removed

  • "Largest Online New Show in the World" Whoohoo you fuckin' commercial whore! TYT are the biggest joke around. What are they? An atheist show? A political show? A celebrity show?

    A Turkish Muslim who names his show after a Turkish Fascist group and pretends to be an atheist whilst constantly lying about and demonizing Christians. Not only that, but despite naming his show after a Fascist movement, he pretends to be a Liberal.

  • Dawkins is a joke. this whole science religion feud is a joke. until someone can explain the singularity then there is no argument as to who is right or wrong. at this point it takes just as much, if not more, faith to believe we came from a microscopic bit of matter rather than something creating us. just saying, I grew up atheist, and in my twenties i became a christian. i know where Dawkins is coming from because ive made the arguments myself. now looking back, it was a petty and stupid fight

  • @jakesimmons815 How does it take faith to believe scientifically proven evidence? But it does take load of faith to believe that a specific God among thousands of other gods created universe just so that he could create gay people and hate them. Which there´s ZERO evidence to support that claim. But that´s why they call it faith, it´s believing without any evidence. Sounds kinda silly to me. Oh the gullibility of humans!

  • @pololopo23 Please then, explain the singularity if it is scientifically proven. Nowhere in the bible does it say god hates gay people. but in old testament times, homosexual activity was strongly associated with idolatrous cult prostitution. "abomination," used in both appearances of homosexual acts in leviticus, is a translation of the hebrew word tow' ebah which means morally disgusting, but also implies idolatry. the new testament does not say any homosexual person is going to hell.

  • @jakesimmons815 You mean singularity as the thing before the Big Bang? No one knows what happened before the Big Bang, but that doesn´t mean that you have to turn to magical thinking(religion). It´s ok not to know, that´s why scientists are working on it.

  • @pololopo23 Point is you cant explain it and neither can I. you cant criticize anyone for their belief, especially considering their beliefs are just as proven as your own.

    Im not saying athiests are not moral, im saying moral athiests are not as easily found. MOST athiests I KNOW are reincarnations of dawkins (who loathe religion and the religious). As I once did myself.

    in regards to the prisoners

    Most people claim to be religious while really, they dont walk the walk.

  • but i seriously do want to know what new information you have for the world. please explain the singularity if you say its scientifically proven

  • i chose to go to church simply because i wanted to be surrounded by people that were actually decent and moral not because of a love for god, considering the fact that i was athiest. By just showing up, my life changed so dramatically i push myself away from all doubts of a loving higher power.

    at the end of it all, i may be wrong about my faith, but thats okay, because i lead an amazing life because of it.

    its not a matter of being gullible, its a matter of being happy and moral

  • @jakesimmons815 We´ll I´m happy if your religion brings you happiness and if it makes you a better person. But obviously atheist have morals too(just look at prison population in U.S, less than one per cent atheist), so it sounds kinda weird that you had to go to church to find those decent and moral people.

  • Didn't know Dawkins had a new book out. Will probably have to check that out.

  • HYPOCRITES!!!

  • Feel sorry for O'reily because atheist will never rule out god but for him there is no other explanation other than god which is very similar to what Muslim fundamentalist have

  • masala g 1:14 o.O what ?? who interpreted these ?

  • O'Reilly is such a pig.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Look, I really don't want to talk to you anymore. Please respect that. If I had known that you were not serious about this discussion I would have left you a long time ago. You have no interest in learning anything about religious people. You think you already have all the answers. So forget it :P

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    bump

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    ... but you won't will you?

    You have seem to have a clear intolerance for religion and it's obviously personal. If it weren't you might consider the feelings of others and the religions they choose for themselves. Do you want to rescue people who don't want your rescuing because you are righteous or because it makes you feel good about yourself? It's not moral if you are doing it for your own personal gain. If you care about people at least try to see it their way first.

  • "It is also hideous to lessen human value in its most natural instance"

    Well what do you consider natural? If you really had to go by observation you'd have to say that racism and sexism are natural. You sit there with your fancy books and your fancy computer, looking down at the Muslims but you completely miss that religion has the answers to those problems. Do you realize the population problem in Pakistan? If you don't accept the veil for religion then accept it for scientific reasons...

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    I have to go to bed now. It's late here.

    Check this out: watch?v=sORTJMyRA7Y

    Honestly I'd rather trust God, with or without scientific certainty, than put my faith in humanity. It's obvious where humanity is going.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Muslims however have a slightly different view about Adam, maybe closer to science.

    I guess you didn't know that the Quran described sperm (at around 600 AD.)

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    To clarify, they are not actually equal, they are also opposite sides. It's a beautiful story isn't it?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    It might also interest you to know that the hebrew word used for rib, as in Adam's rib can also be translated to mean side. This was religious symbolism for man and woman being equal halves.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    You have misread genesis then.

    What the old testament says about Adam and Eve is that GOD told Adam what to do, but he listened to his wife instead. He essentially chose his partner over God.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Did you know that 20% of astronauts are women. Out of those who applied only 1% were women, 99% were men.

    So what we have is a major imbalance that is intentional. That's only one example.

    How about war? Why are women put in the military with exactly the same benefits as men, yet never put in harms way? The death toll of the men are through the roof, yet we still do this. to prove something.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    There is nothing wrong in Islam for a woman to have a job. or do man things. But if she is doing it simply to anger men, or prove that she is superior then that is tipping the scales of balance.

    Sexism is unavoidable. You cannot go through life never attributing anything to sex. And next to nobody is an expert on the opposite sex. Religious people enjoy the guidelines it's much simpler.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    In the end you are answering to some sort of logic that is not your own. Most people do not have the bravery to say, yes this is what I as the husband can do, and this is what I as the wife can do. Instead they buckle under social pressure which did NOT come from religion, but rather stemmed from the french enlightenment.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    It's not just America.

    Do you want to know what is on the other side of the street from my Mosque?

    A giant sized advertizement for Anal beads.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    There is plenty of basis for sexism. It is a never ending problem. Men and women cannot be equals. There can only be balance.

    If a man and a women are hired as brick layers, the man will be able to carry more. He will want to be paid more, and she will claim that is sexist. Both the man and woman have justification for complaining.

  • "they allow a social resentment to rise and gives a background of strict norms"

    What are the social norms in America? Do you think it's justifiable there?

    Why do you think a man and a woman hold hands? For the woman it's sort of an instinct, she wants to feel safe with her man. For the man it's to say 'this is my woman.'

    Have you ever thought about how ridiculous American men and women look to Middle-Easterners when they hold hands and the woman is half naked?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    I go every friday to a Pakistani Mosque. I'm an American citizen. I'm not in any danger and I never was.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    "It's because you suppose it's a moral duty to do it."

    And so do they. I've met Muslim women who were afraid that airport officials would make them take it off. If they were being oppressed they couldn't wait to take it off.

    Do you think the west does not oppress women? On the contrary it is far worse in the west. Women there have been brainwashed into abandoning their nature. It takes a half naked woman to sell a box of beer.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Logic is not everything and neither is Intelligence. That is one of the biggest mistakes the majority of people make. You can be a very smart person in the US, but if you do not have the financial opportunity you will likely amount to nothing at all. So why should you make yourself feel better than someone who wasn't born with your intelligence? You're really no better off.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Look, I've been on both sides of the fence here. I'm a convert to Islam. I grew up in the west.

    But after spending time with Pakistanis it became clear how much the west simply doesn't understand due to war propaganda and cultural divide.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Islam does not teach men to treat women in a lesser way.

    Western culture teaches men to be below women. From a western perspective Muslim women are miserable when covering their heads. It's actually the opposite. They feel it enhances their persona. It makes them feel beautiful.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    "it gives material to people so they can be intolerant,"

    So you've figured out what Satan is. The human ego. Just because you try to follow a religion does not guarantee success. How many science students have reached Hawkins level?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Al aqsa. You might see it as religious conflict. But the way I see it. If you are fighting there it's simply a display of dominance.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    You might be surprised what you find in school books.

    For instance, in the book store while visiting America i was curious... so I had a look in some college prep books.

    There was such propaganda about Islam it was almost nausiating. Why do they have to mention the oppression of women in 600 AD middle east and mention nothing of it in Europe? Europeans were cutting eachothers bowels out.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    You're asking me questions. And I'm answering that. How am I imposing anything on you?

    Suicide is forbidden in Islam. It's an express train to hades.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    There are very good reasons for the roles religious people take. Especially in the times people lived in back then. Women had to be protected up until very recently. Their bodies have always been weaker. In many of the countries the arrogant west want to condemn conditions are still very harsh for the average person.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    I have been studying religion for a while now and let me tell you the Abrahamic religions are so similar that it makes absolutely no sense what so ever to fight amongst each other. In fact all three of them explicitly forbid it.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    The Jewish / Arab conflict is racial, not religious. Get your facts straight :P

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    There are many things in the Quran that have been only recently proven in modern science. The prophet Mohammed (pbuh) was already teaching those things. Do you think it's any coincidence that it was the Muslims who invented the modern medical practices while Europe was still in the dark ages? If there is a chance of the existence of God why do you shut it out?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Yes, during the time of the ancient hebrews the world was a very different place. The prophet moses could do magic through the will of God. We don't have magic anymore do we? Well look at that we don't kill entire villiages in God's name either.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    "It's a death penalty in Iran, I think."

    Well that settles it, I won't move to Iran. The political standpoint against religion is always a bad one.

    "it literally ask people to attack non believers (that includes other religious people and atheists)."

    No it does not. I believe you are referring to the sword versus. They were there to provide mercy to the enemy of an unavoidable conflict.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Well if you look at dogma all day and never try to understand the religion for yourself then you going be very confused.

    Human beings require self discipline. Why do you think there is so much trouble in the world? And haven't you noticed that science has only quickened the demise of human kind?

    You don't have to agree with me on that, agree with Einstein ;)

  • "they all condemn the non-believers"

    No they do not condemn the non-believers. Followers are forbidden to speak for God. Nobody has the right to condemn anyone. Not I and not any Christians either. (Regardless of their sexual orientation.)

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Well now you are speaking theology!

    "The three great religions condemn homosexuality when sexual orientation doesn't even involve agency"

    Not quite. As a Muslim I am not allowed to pray to God after having straight sex without first having a shower. Sex in general is filthy, unless you are doing it for it's natural purpose.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    By the way. It's amazing how celebrated Einstein is in America. In the town where he was born the museum has been closed for years. But you can buy a nice key chain ~_~. The whole idea of science is pathetic if you ask me. Let me know when it's ACTUALLY there to benefit the sick and not really about greed and power.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    From a religious perspective. Your massive brain which you can't seem to stop stroking with joy is your behavioral impurity.

    The only evidence you could try to present against religion would be historical. Science isn't going to cut it. You could for instance say that you think the whole crucifixion was staged by Rome in an attempt to calm disputes between the Jews. But that's a wild claim and the evidence would be inconclusive.

  • Comment removed

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Right. So you are agreeing with me then?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Something does not come out of nothing. If you believe that you can believe that water can be turned to wine.

    What is your point?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Listen. I've been living in Germany for 2 years. Speak German or speak English! Your a guy on you tube not a med school thesis.

    I never made any claims about God that I did not chock up to my own experience as a religious person.

    You're essentially trying to get me to do just that so you can stroke your own ego. It's not going to happen. So don't bother.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    All I have to do to disprove your argument is remind you that Science does not have the answers required to disprove a God. When the unobservable becomes observable you can conduct your experiment. Until then you should scientifically keep your mouth shut. :)

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    You're making the mistake that I care to prove it in the first place. I don't

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    "You have absolutely no inductive basis that allows to conclude upon God"

    Well you have absolutely no evidence to conclude upon the origins of life, or it's purpose.

    What is clear about science is that it places human importance at the forefront of everything. It's mindless egoism. You've got about 80 years on this planet if you are lucky. You really aren't that significant.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Hawkins did not explain the origin of the Universe. He explained that the dust in space collapsed upon itself to form the big bang.

    Where did the dust come from?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    Did you know that John F Kennedy had a secret bunker designed to protect him in case of a nuclear fallout during the Cuban Missile Crisis? It was made of lead. But here's the thing. There was also water with lead inside so that his body would be resistant. (it would have killed him)

    Are you saying that prescribing this to the president of the United States wasn't a leap of faith for science?

    But he didn't die from science or religion. It was good old fashioned hate.

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    In the 1950's it was common for women to wear face cream that was radioactive. The promise was that it was scientifically proven to improve beauty.

    Yes, it may be falsifiable, but you won't find that out in many cases until you are already dead. How is that much different from wanting to know the truth about God?

  • @TennisAnnalyst

    You aren't making much sense. That does not fit the description of your Latin term.

    The bible touches on many aspects of life, most of which place responsibility on the believers themselves, for their own salvation. You would have to really twist the book to fit your nonsensical view.