Soo the game with the realest graphice I played is Battlefield3 and Crysys2 and Sybdicate kindaa good , in my opinion no other game is close to those gameplay graphics...!
So if I understand correctly, this isn't even the "Unreal Engine 4", which Epic will privately show to a small group of people. I couldn't imagine them making an awesome Unreal Engine 3 demo (Like this) and then showing an uglier Unreal Engine 4 demo. The Unreal Engine 4 will be even better, according to that logic.
@Chippy242 This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is not a CGI or cut-scene learn how engines work fool.
@ballowers100 you completely missed what i was saying xD i know how the engine works BUT i think if this was developed into a full legit game rather than just a tech demo i think it could be good (depending on how it is executed. This is not a game all it is is a little scenario showing what he engine can do.
@ballowers100 oh, and it is a cut-scene. just cause it isn't cgi doesn't mean it isn't a cut scene. Its just an engine generated cut-scene no different than the cut scenes found in something like say mass effect. Know what cut scenes are fool!
@KillaFlavour This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is not a cut-scene or CGI it has fixed camera effects and it is a game demo as it is not completed still a game though.
@87fixxxer This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is a game demo as it is not completed still a game though.
Does not look that good.Kids making games these days really are retarded fags.All they do is dd blur,bloom,headbob,screen hsakes,glare,lans flare and other retarded visual effects
@strelok1988 Gné ? I know this is UE 3, did you at least read my comment ? I said "NEXT WEEK" there will be a presentation of UE 4.0 ( wich technically means that is has not been seen yet and since this video was uploaded a year ago... ) ! I never said that this was the UE 4, I mean unlike you I READ.
@billybobjoeftw no there is lots of diference between cinematic and gamplay. If u don't believe me look on "cryengine 3 cinematic tool" and Crysis 2, all of them are real time but C2 looks much worst. Here is non cinematic Samaritan: /watch?v=UY_kTMFpQ4E. So, as you can see in gameplay it not look that cool like in "Official Demo". I know ...sad but thats how game pro works.
@billybobjoeftw yes but it use 3d Samaritan model, and u can see that is no nextgen like in this movie. If u add some DOF, lens flare efect ad set camera in specific angle u will get that super graphic ...but if u run this tchenology in-game it won't be looking so "epic". We need UE4 not UE3 to make games look like in this movie.
@strelok1988 This is not a movie it is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is a game demo as it is not completed learn how game engines work you fool.
@strelok1988 What about when Uncharted 2 was first shown and everyone that the 'cinematics' were just that. Cinematics. The awkward moment when it turns out to be gameplay
@strelok1988 Stop being the stupid one this is a fucking game actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you jealous console gaming ignorant fool.
@strelok1988 No? Why would they make a cinematic trailer for an engine? That's not very logical is it? This could be made by todays cinematic standards easily. Not that i think that games will actually look exactly like this but it sure is something to aim for.
@dashDmoney you're obviously dumb 600 you could build a decent machine that could run games on low-medium. unless you fucking live in nunavut don't be a twat
this is why you should get the best graphics card you can get. the way amd and nvidia are staggering their releases, the top cards only drop 10-20% in price over 1 year. so if you buy a radeon 7970 today, then you can sell it a year later to upgrade to the next $400-$500 card without outlaying much more cash. just built my sub-$1000 gaming rig with this in mind. check it: rightrig.tumblr.com
@valmanzar16 Just to let you know the PC of today can run games with graphics like this even better and next gen consoles will not be able to run these graphics or better at all.
Because their engine is totally new and has been in development for years. I've heard that it scales very well. Also, they might've found a way to make it more efficient, as in it has a higher graphics quality for less power. I don't know what the features are however if they continued with 3, consoles wouldn't be able to run it (this), so they probably can scale it better.
Just sad to see reality like this is held back due to consoles and gamers who don't know how to effectively create a powerful PC for under $600 that can run majority of games at high settings.
@AuRevoirTune Now how in the bloody hell do you create a PC that runs Crysis 2 at high settings, under 600 bucks? There's no way on earth that's happening, not with these prices.
@Vmt16 Like I said, 'MAJORITY' as in most except probably Crysis, Crysis 2, Metro 2033, Witcher 2 and a few others on high. Though, if you got a good price on a GPU you could run Crysis 2 and Witcher 2 on high settings, though not maximum. You can easily make a PC under $600 that has a GTX 460 including price or OS. Not including OS if you already have an OS (most do) you could make a nice build for $600 with a GTX 560 Ti or HD6950.
@AuRevoirTune are you serious.......you trolling bro.........a stock 6950 2gb is gonna cost you between 280-300 dollars, and if you don't wanna bottleneck your gpu, you gonna have to chuck up another 250 for a decent processor i recommend the i5 2500k as well as a decent PSU, i would recommend a corsair, at least 8gb of ram and a case plus a motherboard that has crossfire or sli support for future upgrades. For a build ur speaking of, your gonna have spend a 1000 dollars easy
@tubintheweb1 Uh, are you serious dude? First off, you can get a GTX 460 for $150 or a GTX 560 Ti for $185, GTX 560 Ti is better than the HD 6950 unless you got one that can unlock, which I doubt you can now. You don't need a i5 2500k, you can easily overclock a i3 or i5 to not bottleneck. PSU's aren't expensive for a good 700w or so one that will last with brand name. You only need 4gb, you can go for 6gb if you'd like and ram is REALLY cheap to get a 1600 or more one.
@AuRevoirTune WTH!!!! I hope your not talking about 1gb 560 Ti or 6950 for that matter, if you plan to play games like this game in the next two years, why would you waste money on a card that has 1gb of virtual memory, secondly the 2gb models cost around 250-300 period no bullshit, secondly, a good psu with a good wattage and amperage is gonna cost you anywhere from 150-200 dollars. No way you can build what you where saying for 600 dollars......ur lying out ur ass
@tubintheweb1 You do know dedicated memory for a GPU only matters if you plan to go eyefinity/multiple displays right? It has nothing to do with the power of the card for most people, since most people have 1 GPU. A SeaSonic Gold X650 PSU will cost you $140, but that isn't even required for that setup, you can run it for less than 650w. It's not hard to build a good build for under $600, just need to know what you're doing.
resolution and rendering effects are done by virtual memory. This video that we watched just now took 3 GTX 580s to play at a stable frame rate. IF you plan to play games like this in the future you will not waste money on such a low end PSU and a 1gb gpu,ahh well if people wanna limit themselves go right ahead ......I know at least on my rig, i can easily crossfire 2 GPUs and add another couple gigs for the future with my PSU. Random Trivia 3 580 = ? memory you do the math....
@tubintheweb1 This is a demo meant to display the best possible rendering effects, you won't need that much memory unless you go eyefinity or multiple displays like I said, 1gb will be efficient, a GTX 560 Ti is better than HD 6950 otherwise. Like I said, you could get a better CPU for the cost of the one they had. Also, this is a $600 gaming PC, including the OS's price. Can't expect to have it all for that price. It will last you a good amount of years.
@AuRevoirTune First of all the 6950 and 560Ti are practically equal, and if you flash the 6950, it pretty much becomes a 6970, which means 6950> 560TI, secondly, rendering effects essentially increase the amount of memory you use. Fully maxing out a game like this will use over 1 gb of memory. IF you think this game is using less than 1 gb of memory. Then i guess this conversation is done.
@tubintheweb1 I know, but a GTX 560 Ti is still a bit better usually. I already said I doubt you'll get a GPU that can flash to 6970 since only the first batches were flashable. Again, this is only a demo, not an actual game, the actual game wouldn't require 2gb of ram, it's called optimization. They don't care about optimization for demos since it's about showing off the full power of the engine, not what the end user can use.
@AuRevoirTune This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed.
@AuRevoirTune actually thats wrong bf3 uses 1.5gb of the gpu's memory on highest settings that is confirmed by dice so you need a 2gb gpu to run on highest settings
@calumknight1984 Again, I'm talking about a $600 PC including cost of OS for gaming and a HD 6950 costs too much to be efficient. GT 550 Ti is good performance for a good price.
@calumknight1984 Again, I'm talking about a $600 PC including cost of OS for gaming and a HD 6950 costs too much to be efficient. GT 550 Ti is good performance for a good price.
@tubintheweb1 Google How To Build A Kick-Ass Crysis 2 PC For Under $600 and the first result should be one from GeForce that will even give you a good build, but you can still build a better build than that for under $600 if you try hard enough, but still a quality build that will run stuff.
@AuRevoirTune you can unlock all gpu's its simple bios flash your referring to those with dual bios so if anything did go wrong you flip a switch to the backup default bios but you can still do it without that feature at your own risk, not sure if they still sell them though.
@calumknight1984 The only GPU I know that has that is PowerColor's PCS++ that got discontinued before, don't know if it got recontinued. The only GPU that was flashable were the early HD 6950's to HD6970's. Unless you're referring to overclocking, then obviously you can do that.
@AuRevoirTune nope to "unlock" the 6950's gpu core to turn it into a 6970 its a scarily easy bios flash using atiflash tool (or something like that cant remember the name google it you'll find it). And that goes for ALL gpu's derived from a more powerful one, to get the lower down parts they shutdown parts of the gpu's for multiple reasons, maybe for yield reasons or faulty parts (hence the risk) etc. You can flash any gpu you want to that meets that criteria at your own risk
@AuRevoirTune the one your referring to was the first amd 6950's by the way, they all came with dual bios (kind of a gift from amd) ive got one but after flashing it to a 6970 it started overheating so i flashed it back to the old bios, maybe if i can find a better cooler for it i may try it again.....
@tubintheweb1 Crossfire and SLI is a waste of money, the money you waste getting crossfire you can just get a new GPU after a good amount of years and will have better end results since crossfire and SLI tend to have issues with a few games, but even then, most Mobo's now have crossfire and SLI support. You obviously don't know how to build a proper PC, or even know the cost of equipment if you think a GPU will run you $300 and that 8gb is needed.
@ballowers100 Thats just a flat out lie, you can't play BF3 maxed out with AA on high in 1080p without at least spending about 400-500 for a gfx card. My you would have to have a 6990 to max everything across the board or one GTX 590. Im talking consistent frames above 60fps is not doable maxed out without these two cards. my 6950 gets only 35fps on ULTRA, which is pretty much unplayable in multiplayer. But whatever keep telling lies if you must. Dam troll
@calumknight1984 thats just not true with MSAA and AF turned on with everything on ultra the 6950 gets about 35 fps, without MSAA and Af, you can get about 60fps. But maxed out means cracking all the options on, not just choosing what you want to use and don't.
@tubintheweb1 wrong ive just been playing it with msaa and af turned on a nice steady 50-60fps and I am talking about EVERYTHING set to ultra or max settings. Dunno if its a newer set of drivers than whatever youve seen it running on or maybe better cpu/more memory but the 6950 does in fact run bf3 at max settings a nice 50-60fps. I even had motion blur on which i usually turn off because i hate, it didnt really make much of a difference
Core i7 2600K@4500Ghz 8gb and single GTX580 here. On ultra with MSAA on it runs at 40-45-50 fps with drops to 35 and even lower in heavy load scenes. 99% load on GPU in MSI afterburner so it is the limits of GTX580. Playing on Ultra with MSAA turned off on 45-(B2K maps)-60-75 and up to 100+ depending on the map. But with MSAA turned on it is almost always below 50 on any map. Res. 1920*1080.
So its hardly possible that you run BF2 on fps you mentioned on ultra
@87fixxxer well i do and if i find the damn cable for my phone id record it with the fps renderred in the corner for all to see after showing my setup. Might have something to do with having gpu cores unlocked (just the cores its at stock 6950 clocks though to avoid overheat issues i was having, so not a full unlock i doubt its making that amount of difference). MSAA turned on it drops to 40ish under moments of high loads but stable 50-60 rest of the time
@87fixxxer like i said its prob more to do with a later driver set than anything else performance has notably changed from when bf3 first came out, although as mentioned that was also due to memory usage and the following upgrade in that department
@87fixxxer not sure if im explaining the gpu well enough :S, its got the cores unlocked stock its 1408 cores but ive unlocked it to 1536 cores. Its at the stock 6950 clocks though would that make the difference? Never really noticed if it made any difference or not, jsut kind of did it after trying it entirely with a 6970 bios but overheated so tried that bios didnt notice a change but couldnt be bothered changing it back so left it.......
Yes it would make noticable difference in performance. But still as what i saw from many benchs even 6970 is slower in Battlefield 3 than 580. Though cant tell how its now with new drivers for ati and last BF3 small patch wich optimizes game for 7*** ATI architecture.
@ballowers100 sigh looks like you forgot the psu, motherboard, case, fans, operating system, cd/dvd drive, usb attachments, thermal paste for cpu, NIC card, etc...
if your talking about building a computer from scratch ur missing alot of components. That goes well over 600, but ok you keep dreaming.
lets add: 100 for your cpu, 60 for your ram, 150(suspect) for your gpu, 120 for HDD, cheap case for 100 bucks, a decent psu will be 150, internal dvd drive 30 bucks, windows150 already 860 bucks
@tubintheweb1 not to mention i didn't even include everything like usb attachments or a NIC card if you plan to use a ethernet cord, or fans if they don't come with the case, as well as thermal paste for your cpu. Ahh well you can get away saying that to someone who hasn't put a pc together before, but not me.
@tubintheweb1 phenom 965 3.4ghz quad core cpu (more cores the better frostbite 2.0 scales the more cores you have, 3 or above preferably), 8gb mem (bf3 needs this i had 4gb and the game lagged hasnt lagged since i was advised to upgrade to 8gb), amd 6950 2gb. BF3 every setting maxed out runs 50-60fps and i was just playing it not 10 minutes ago
@Mabswer This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed it is not a cut-scene.
@Finky27 I doubt it, since all films that are CGs are pre rendered and these "game" engines are run in real time... plus hollywood filmmakers will make more money if they make their own CGs...
I can see now that this was done while working on Bulletstorm,not new unreal,question is did they start working on new Unreal when they finished Bulletstorm...hmm i bet they did ,but does anyone know more info on new Unreal game
@PunkedPenguin@kestazas Yeah, it is actually game play graphics. Why would Unreal showcase their new graphics engine with a CG, out-of-engine trailer? These are in-engine, playable graphics with fixed camera movements. Every game out now does it. It's not a new thing. Get with it.
@DJCompoz pls learn about the engine engine is not a graphics it's the calculations on series of codes like how water works waves ect so jeah it is CGI on unreal 3 engine and no this is not game play graphics
@kestazas Dude the Samaritan Demo is a REAL TIME demo. meaning its been rendered in real-time, on actual hardware. so no its not a pre-rendered video that you have incorrectly described as CGI.
So please learn about game engines because yes this is gameplay graphics...
@kestazas This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed this is not a CGI.
@PunkedPenguin Just to let you know this is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards not a cut-scene it is a demo of a game as it is not completed.
@ballowers100 This isn't any game, as the title obviously states, it's just a demo of what Samaritan can accomplish. But whoever designed the demo should consider making a game, they seem to have talent.
P.S. That's a serious fucking run-on sentence you have going on
@RavageCobra This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed.
@ballowers100 For the last time, THIS IS NOT A GAME THEY'RE WORKING ON. It's just gameplay of the engine showing it what it can do. I don't know what the fuck your prepubescent mind is thinking, but I'm not wasting my life like you arguing over something as simple as this to a child. Stupid. Fucking. Cunt.
@RavageCobra This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is not a CGI or cut-scene learn how engines work fool.
Speaking at DICE Summit 2012, reported by Develop, Epic founder Tim Sweeney said the technical wizardry of the Samaritan tech demo, which was running in Unreal Engine 3, required 2.5 teraFLOPS to run, LOLOLOLOL
not bad as CGI and no this not game play... and the hero so stupid no challenge fighting the "bad guys" thats boring and when he got lock chain w/e in his way his bad assnes ends cuz with all his superpowers he needs to weld that thing for hours and newer get it open I think he gave up there
@TheFoxshot This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is a demo of a game as it is not completed but still playable.
Same, but a year after the new Xbox comes out they'll be another 2 generations behind :| This is the first gen I can think of where they're going to be properly out-done by PC's.
@zesedentario Just to let you know this demo is a game a game demo that is since it is not completed it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards.
why we havent seen graphichs like that? because developers are more focused on the old console harware than the modern harware if consoles didnt exist who knows maybe we alredy have close to reality graphichs
Games would already look like this if they would be only made for PC and for max 3 year old PC's. I'm 100% sure i'd run this demo on my 2 years old laptop with 20 fps simply by turning tessalation off.
Games would already look like this if they would be only made for PC and for max 3 year old PC's. I'm 100% sure i'd run this demo on my 2 years old laptop with 200 fps simply by turning tessalation off.
it's funny cause uneal annouced this wont even be able to run on next gen consoles, though this was done ona pc, i guess console gamers just dont understand power
The GTX 580 is only.. 1.7TFlops or so, but the 7970 is only ~40% faster and it's something like double the TFlops. Nvidia and AMD GPU's aren't the same so comparing them directly isn't really possible.
just saw a article with talking with epic game and they said next xbox would have to 10 times as powerful in all aspects to run this at 1080p 30 fpsand the development kits they have of next xbox right now is only 6x more powerful then 360 and that there trying to convince microsoft it needs to be more powerful
so what this video wants to tell me is that this awesome shit is ingame graphics!? o.O Cuz if not, then cool... but nothing special cuz it's not like there haven't been awesome animations like this before...
Can anyone confirm if this is real or not?
/watch?v=lLkZO88kuKI
The uploader claims its actual footage from the unreal engine 4. If it is, then good job Epic.
DaNooGuy 1 hour ago
If he's so strong, why didn't he smash that door open at the beginning?
AquaNovaBlast 8 hours ago
Soo the game with the realest graphice I played is Battlefield3 and Crysys2 and Sybdicate kindaa good , in my opinion no other game is close to those gameplay graphics...!
GiovanniSicarioGN 11 hours ago
What happened to the hobo? Lol
neilmaambong 12 hours ago
@gleemanvox23 Well throwing cigarettes at random people is how I met my girlfriend.
NotSoHotGuy002 13 hours ago
Say when can I get this on my iPhone ;)
brennendw 19 hours ago
So if I understand correctly, this isn't even the "Unreal Engine 4", which Epic will privately show to a small group of people. I couldn't imagine them making an awesome Unreal Engine 3 demo (Like this) and then showing an uglier Unreal Engine 4 demo. The Unreal Engine 4 will be even better, according to that logic.
GeekingForJesus 19 hours ago
Anyone else wish this was a real game?
Chippy242 20 hours ago 3
@Chippy242 This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is not a CGI or cut-scene learn how engines work fool.
ballowers100 19 hours ago
@ballowers100 you completely missed what i was saying xD i know how the engine works BUT i think if this was developed into a full legit game rather than just a tech demo i think it could be good (depending on how it is executed. This is not a game all it is is a little scenario showing what he engine can do.
Chippy242 14 hours ago
@ballowers100 oh, and it is a cut-scene. just cause it isn't cgi doesn't mean it isn't a cut scene. Its just an engine generated cut-scene no different than the cut scenes found in something like say mass effect. Know what cut scenes are fool!
Chippy242 14 hours ago
Comment removed
ballowers100 14 hours ago
@ballowers100 Saints Row 3,Saints Row 2, Saints Row, Grand Theft Auto:San Andreas, EA Sports MMA, NHL 2002-12, ETC. you've just been disproven
KillaFlavour 13 hours ago
@KillaFlavour This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is not a cut-scene or CGI it has fixed camera effects and it is a game demo as it is not completed still a game though.
ballowers100 11 hours ago
@ballowers100 It's not a game actually. It's a tech demo - a realtime render showing what engine is capable of.
87fixxxer 5 hours ago
@87fixxxer This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is a game demo as it is not completed still a game though.
ballowers100 4 hours ago
@ballowers100 its not a game...its a render demo. 87 is right.
DaNooGuy 54 minutes ago
@Chippy242 Hard Reset might interest you. c:
TheOtherLioyd 10 hours ago
@Chippy242 very soon we'll get it at a game
MrAircraft999 3 hours ago
i want to see the second part :-)
paparas2000 1 day ago
how did such a big robot sneak up on him....
789reishram 1 day ago
Does not look that good.Kids making games these days really are retarded fags.All they do is dd blur,bloom,headbob,screen hsakes,glare,lans flare and other retarded visual effects
TheSUBGAMER 1 day ago
@TheSUBGAMER
Can I see your engine? It must be amazing.
Sormenkynsi 1 day ago
@Sormenkynsi That,s what your mother said -)
TheSUBGAMER 1 day ago
@TheSUBGAMER And the funny thing made made your logic idiotic is that all of them are real life camera effects.
NukeMyHouse 16 hours ago
@NukeMyHouse lol you really are retarded -)
kiddo,in games you are not a walking camera
peace
TheSUBGAMER 10 hours ago
I think he won
Wolverine131455 1 day ago
if thats what it looks like on here imagine ur tv
blackheartsk8 1 day ago
Look's stunning!
sl1xx 1 day ago
Looks like the creators of the engine
*Puts on shades*
Are pretty Epic
YYYYYEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHH!!!
BoBTheEND 1 day ago
Looks like the engine
*Puts on shades*
Is pretty Unreal
YYYYYEEEEAAAAHHHHH!!!!
BoBTheEND 1 day ago
Is in the trailer what is this game
spidermanspider01 1 day ago
My pc does this already. Ever heard of mods?
TrevorBall85 1 day ago
Comment removed
ballowers100 1 day ago
does this guy actually smoke his cigarettes? or does he just light them up to flick at things?
gleemanvox23 2 days ago 27
Comment removed
gleemanvox23 2 days ago
@strelok1988 Gné ? I know this is UE 3, did you at least read my comment ? I said "NEXT WEEK" there will be a presentation of UE 4.0 ( wich technically means that is has not been seen yet and since this video was uploaded a year ago... ) ! I never said that this was the UE 4, I mean unlike you I READ.
AnbuProd 2 days ago
Now THAT is how you help a ol lady!
nustiuma 2 days ago
shit engine but so many developers uses
turkfb0000 2 days ago
@strelok1988
This is rendered real time, aka gameplay.
billybobjoeftw 2 days ago
@billybobjoeftw no there is lots of diference between cinematic and gamplay. If u don't believe me look on "cryengine 3 cinematic tool" and Crysis 2, all of them are real time but C2 looks much worst. Here is non cinematic Samaritan: /watch?v=UY_kTMFpQ4E. So, as you can see in gameplay it not look that cool like in "Official Demo". I know ...sad but thats how game pro works.
strelok1988 2 days ago
@strelok1988
That video was just to showcase the clothing physics.....
billybobjoeftw 2 days ago
@billybobjoeftw yes but it use 3d Samaritan model, and u can see that is no nextgen like in this movie. If u add some DOF, lens flare efect ad set camera in specific angle u will get that super graphic ...but if u run this tchenology in-game it won't be looking so "epic". We need UE4 not UE3 to make games look like in this movie.
strelok1988 2 days ago
@strelok1988 This is not a movie it is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is a game demo as it is not completed learn how game engines work you fool.
ballowers100 2 days ago
@strelok1988 What about when Uncharted 2 was first shown and everyone that the 'cinematics' were just that. Cinematics. The awkward moment when it turns out to be gameplay
Sonicisunleashed2008 2 days ago
Kind of reminds me of arkham city.
staticrubber 2 days ago
MY EYES *0*
rockyheart609 2 days ago
é_é
=_=
omg
demiro86 2 days ago
cant wait for real time liquid :P
MXOY99 2 days ago
@MXOY99 We already have real time liquid.
ballowers100 2 days ago
@ballowers100 uhh i know... just not enough...and im meaning for blood... not water... Overgrowth is good for blood :)
MXOY99 1 day ago
@strelok1988 Stop being the stupid one this is a fucking game actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you jealous console gaming ignorant fool.
ballowers100 2 days ago
@strelok1988 No? Why would they make a cinematic trailer for an engine? That's not very logical is it? This could be made by todays cinematic standards easily. Not that i think that games will actually look exactly like this but it sure is something to aim for.
TiipX 2 days ago
@strelok1988 You're wrong, this isn't cinematic, its in-game graphics that work on TriSLI GTX 580. You should search before saying bullshit.
BynXGTS 2 days ago
Some of us live in Canada where $600 cant buy you shit let alone parts to build a solid PC
dashDmoney 2 days ago
@dashDmoney you're obviously dumb 600 you could build a decent machine that could run games on low-medium. unless you fucking live in nunavut don't be a twat
GetsMadAlot 2 days ago
@dashDmoney price in terms of parts and technology do not differ substantially from the US and CA. I live in canada and can vouch for that
TheSilentHawx 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is why you should get the best graphics card you can get. the way amd and nvidia are staggering their releases, the top cards only drop 10-20% in price over 1 year. so if you buy a radeon 7970 today, then you can sell it a year later to upgrade to the next $400-$500 card without outlaying much more cash. just built my sub-$1000 gaming rig with this in mind. check it: rightrig.tumblr.com
fiachamp 2 days ago
2:29 - Sir you are under arrest
2:30 - FUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!
kshep92 2 days ago
wtf, if this is UE3 (and by the looks of the demo it would only run on next gen consoles and PC) then why would EPIC announced UE4 at GDC next week?
valmanzar16 2 days ago
@valmanzar16 Just to let you know the PC of today can run games with graphics like this even better and next gen consoles will not be able to run these graphics or better at all.
ballowers100 2 days ago
@ballowers100 i know that, but you didnt answer my question.
valmanzar16 2 days ago
@valmanzar16
Because their engine is totally new and has been in development for years. I've heard that it scales very well. Also, they might've found a way to make it more efficient, as in it has a higher graphics quality for less power. I don't know what the features are however if they continued with 3, consoles wouldn't be able to run it (this), so they probably can scale it better.
billybobjoeftw 2 days ago
So im guessing g this is not a game...sigh :l
Rawrtrigga 2 days ago
it's like prototype 17 XD
LozerClub 2 days ago
if only it had better graphics
quentinn2 2 days ago
@kestazas Yeah, what Zetrox2k said.
DJCompoz 2 days ago
Just sad to see reality like this is held back due to consoles and gamers who don't know how to effectively create a powerful PC for under $600 that can run majority of games at high settings.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
@AuRevoirTune Now how in the bloody hell do you create a PC that runs Crysis 2 at high settings, under 600 bucks? There's no way on earth that's happening, not with these prices.
Vmt16 2 days ago
@Vmt16 Like I said, 'MAJORITY' as in most except probably Crysis, Crysis 2, Metro 2033, Witcher 2 and a few others on high. Though, if you got a good price on a GPU you could run Crysis 2 and Witcher 2 on high settings, though not maximum. You can easily make a PC under $600 that has a GTX 460 including price or OS. Not including OS if you already have an OS (most do) you could make a nice build for $600 with a GTX 560 Ti or HD6950.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
@AuRevoirTune are you serious.......you trolling bro.........a stock 6950 2gb is gonna cost you between 280-300 dollars, and if you don't wanna bottleneck your gpu, you gonna have to chuck up another 250 for a decent processor i recommend the i5 2500k as well as a decent PSU, i would recommend a corsair, at least 8gb of ram and a case plus a motherboard that has crossfire or sli support for future upgrades. For a build ur speaking of, your gonna have spend a 1000 dollars easy
tubintheweb1 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 Uh, are you serious dude? First off, you can get a GTX 460 for $150 or a GTX 560 Ti for $185, GTX 560 Ti is better than the HD 6950 unless you got one that can unlock, which I doubt you can now. You don't need a i5 2500k, you can easily overclock a i3 or i5 to not bottleneck. PSU's aren't expensive for a good 700w or so one that will last with brand name. You only need 4gb, you can go for 6gb if you'd like and ram is REALLY cheap to get a 1600 or more one.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
@AuRevoirTune WTH!!!! I hope your not talking about 1gb 560 Ti or 6950 for that matter, if you plan to play games like this game in the next two years, why would you waste money on a card that has 1gb of virtual memory, secondly the 2gb models cost around 250-300 period no bullshit, secondly, a good psu with a good wattage and amperage is gonna cost you anywhere from 150-200 dollars. No way you can build what you where saying for 600 dollars......ur lying out ur ass
tubintheweb1 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 You do know dedicated memory for a GPU only matters if you plan to go eyefinity/multiple displays right? It has nothing to do with the power of the card for most people, since most people have 1 GPU. A SeaSonic Gold X650 PSU will cost you $140, but that isn't even required for that setup, you can run it for less than 650w. It's not hard to build a good build for under $600, just need to know what you're doing.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
resolution and rendering effects are done by virtual memory. This video that we watched just now took 3 GTX 580s to play at a stable frame rate. IF you plan to play games like this in the future you will not waste money on such a low end PSU and a 1gb gpu,ahh well if people wanna limit themselves go right ahead ......I know at least on my rig, i can easily crossfire 2 GPUs and add another couple gigs for the future with my PSU. Random Trivia 3 580 = ? memory you do the math....
tubintheweb1 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 This is a demo meant to display the best possible rendering effects, you won't need that much memory unless you go eyefinity or multiple displays like I said, 1gb will be efficient, a GTX 560 Ti is better than HD 6950 otherwise. Like I said, you could get a better CPU for the cost of the one they had. Also, this is a $600 gaming PC, including the OS's price. Can't expect to have it all for that price. It will last you a good amount of years.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
@AuRevoirTune First of all the 6950 and 560Ti are practically equal, and if you flash the 6950, it pretty much becomes a 6970, which means 6950> 560TI, secondly, rendering effects essentially increase the amount of memory you use. Fully maxing out a game like this will use over 1 gb of memory. IF you think this game is using less than 1 gb of memory. Then i guess this conversation is done.
tubintheweb1 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 I know, but a GTX 560 Ti is still a bit better usually. I already said I doubt you'll get a GPU that can flash to 6970 since only the first batches were flashable. Again, this is only a demo, not an actual game, the actual game wouldn't require 2gb of ram, it's called optimization. They don't care about optimization for demos since it's about showing off the full power of the engine, not what the end user can use.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AuRevoirTune This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed.
ballowers100 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 gpus in crossfire / SLI don't use the sum of their RAM, they distrib gpu work
fiachamp 2 days ago 6
@AuRevoirTune actually thats wrong bf3 uses 1.5gb of the gpu's memory on highest settings that is confirmed by dice so you need a 2gb gpu to run on highest settings
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@calumknight1984 Again, I'm talking about a $600 PC including cost of OS for gaming and a HD 6950 costs too much to be efficient. GT 550 Ti is good performance for a good price.
AuRevoirTune 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@calumknight1984 Again, I'm talking about a $600 PC including cost of OS for gaming and a HD 6950 costs too much to be efficient. GT 550 Ti is good performance for a good price.
AuRevoirTune 1 day ago
@tubintheweb1 Google How To Build A Kick-Ass Crysis 2 PC For Under $600 and the first result should be one from GeForce that will even give you a good build, but you can still build a better build than that for under $600 if you try hard enough, but still a quality build that will run stuff.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
@AuRevoirTune you can unlock all gpu's its simple bios flash your referring to those with dual bios so if anything did go wrong you flip a switch to the backup default bios but you can still do it without that feature at your own risk, not sure if they still sell them though.
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@calumknight1984 The only GPU I know that has that is PowerColor's PCS++ that got discontinued before, don't know if it got recontinued. The only GPU that was flashable were the early HD 6950's to HD6970's. Unless you're referring to overclocking, then obviously you can do that.
AuRevoirTune 1 day ago
@AuRevoirTune nope to "unlock" the 6950's gpu core to turn it into a 6970 its a scarily easy bios flash using atiflash tool (or something like that cant remember the name google it you'll find it). And that goes for ALL gpu's derived from a more powerful one, to get the lower down parts they shutdown parts of the gpu's for multiple reasons, maybe for yield reasons or faulty parts (hence the risk) etc. You can flash any gpu you want to that meets that criteria at your own risk
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@AuRevoirTune the one your referring to was the first amd 6950's by the way, they all came with dual bios (kind of a gift from amd) ive got one but after flashing it to a 6970 it started overheating so i flashed it back to the old bios, maybe if i can find a better cooler for it i may try it again.....
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@tubintheweb1 Crossfire and SLI is a waste of money, the money you waste getting crossfire you can just get a new GPU after a good amount of years and will have better end results since crossfire and SLI tend to have issues with a few games, but even then, most Mobo's now have crossfire and SLI support. You obviously don't know how to build a proper PC, or even know the cost of equipment if you think a GPU will run you $300 and that 8gb is needed.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 For $600 you can make a good fucking PC to play any game on max settings you fool.
ballowers100 2 days ago
@ballowers100 Thats just a flat out lie, you can't play BF3 maxed out with AA on high in 1080p without at least spending about 400-500 for a gfx card. My you would have to have a 6990 to max everything across the board or one GTX 590. Im talking consistent frames above 60fps is not doable maxed out without these two cards. my 6950 gets only 35fps on ULTRA, which is pretty much unplayable in multiplayer. But whatever keep telling lies if you must. Dam troll
tubintheweb1 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 £250 amd 6950 running bf3 max settings solid 50-60fps not 1 minute ago, do more research
calumknight1984 2 days ago
@calumknight1984 thats just not true with MSAA and AF turned on with everything on ultra the 6950 gets about 35 fps, without MSAA and Af, you can get about 60fps. But maxed out means cracking all the options on, not just choosing what you want to use and don't.
tubintheweb1 2 days ago
@tubintheweb1 wrong ive just been playing it with msaa and af turned on a nice steady 50-60fps and I am talking about EVERYTHING set to ultra or max settings. Dunno if its a newer set of drivers than whatever youve seen it running on or maybe better cpu/more memory but the 6950 does in fact run bf3 at max settings a nice 50-60fps. I even had motion blur on which i usually turn off because i hate, it didnt really make much of a difference
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@calumknight1984
Core i7 2600K@4500Ghz 8gb and single GTX580 here. On ultra with MSAA on it runs at 40-45-50 fps with drops to 35 and even lower in heavy load scenes. 99% load on GPU in MSI afterburner so it is the limits of GTX580. Playing on Ultra with MSAA turned off on 45-(B2K maps)-60-75 and up to 100+ depending on the map. But with MSAA turned on it is almost always below 50 on any map. Res. 1920*1080.
So its hardly possible that you run BF2 on fps you mentioned on ultra
87fixxxer 1 day ago
@87fixxxer well i do and if i find the damn cable for my phone id record it with the fps renderred in the corner for all to see after showing my setup. Might have something to do with having gpu cores unlocked (just the cores its at stock 6950 clocks though to avoid overheat issues i was having, so not a full unlock i doubt its making that amount of difference). MSAA turned on it drops to 40ish under moments of high loads but stable 50-60 rest of the time
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@87fixxxer like i said its prob more to do with a later driver set than anything else performance has notably changed from when bf3 first came out, although as mentioned that was also due to memory usage and the following upgrade in that department
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@87fixxxer not sure if im explaining the gpu well enough :S, its got the cores unlocked stock its 1408 cores but ive unlocked it to 1536 cores. Its at the stock 6950 clocks though would that make the difference? Never really noticed if it made any difference or not, jsut kind of did it after trying it entirely with a 6970 bios but overheated so tried that bios didnt notice a change but couldnt be bothered changing it back so left it.......
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@calumknight1984
Yes it would make noticable difference in performance. But still as what i saw from many benchs even 6970 is slower in Battlefield 3 than 580. Though cant tell how its now with new drivers for ati and last BF3 small patch wich optimizes game for 7*** ATI architecture.
87fixxxer 1 day ago
Comment removed
ballowers100 2 days ago
@ballowers100 sigh looks like you forgot the psu, motherboard, case, fans, operating system, cd/dvd drive, usb attachments, thermal paste for cpu, NIC card, etc...
if your talking about building a computer from scratch ur missing alot of components. That goes well over 600, but ok you keep dreaming.
lets add: 100 for your cpu, 60 for your ram, 150(suspect) for your gpu, 120 for HDD, cheap case for 100 bucks, a decent psu will be 150, internal dvd drive 30 bucks, windows150 already 860 bucks
tubintheweb1 1 day ago
@tubintheweb1 not to mention i didn't even include everything like usb attachments or a NIC card if you plan to use a ethernet cord, or fans if they don't come with the case, as well as thermal paste for your cpu. Ahh well you can get away saying that to someone who hasn't put a pc together before, but not me.
tubintheweb1 1 day ago
@tubintheweb1 I already have a case, fans, psu, motherboard,thermal paste, usb attachments, NIC card and the OS I pirate that so it's free.
ballowers100 1 day ago
@ballowers100 Well, you're an upstanding citizen aren't you.
Your parents must be so proud.
w0mblemania 1 day ago
Comment removed
ballowers100 2 days ago
Comment removed
ballowers100 1 day ago
@tubintheweb1 phenom 965 3.4ghz quad core cpu (more cores the better frostbite 2.0 scales the more cores you have, 3 or above preferably), 8gb mem (bf3 needs this i had 4gb and the game lagged hasnt lagged since i was advised to upgrade to 8gb), amd 6950 2gb. BF3 every setting maxed out runs 50-60fps and i was just playing it not 10 minutes ago
calumknight1984 1 day ago
@Vmt16 For $600 you can make a good gaming PC to play any game on max graphics.
ballowers100 2 days ago
I hope they release Samaritan as a real game someday, looks awesome.
AuRevoirTune 2 days ago
is this rendered in real-time? or is it just pre-rendered?
GoldBasicFriend 2 days ago
@GoldBasicFriend real time i believe
Rapture189 2 days ago
Everything Always looks good in Trailers.. funny thing xD
Mabswer 2 days ago
@Mabswer This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed it is not a cut-scene.
ballowers100 2 days ago
Son of a bitch games look so good now
Maybe movie industry might use these engine to create films, much economic
Finky27 3 days ago
@Finky27 I doubt it, since all films that are CGs are pre rendered and these "game" engines are run in real time... plus hollywood filmmakers will make more money if they make their own CGs...
labpoe 2 days ago
@PunkedPenguin cool
DJCompoz 3 days ago
I can see now that this was done while working on Bulletstorm,not new unreal,question is did they start working on new Unreal when they finished Bulletstorm...hmm i bet they did ,but does anyone know more info on new Unreal game
dedskin1 3 days ago
@PunkedPenguin @kestazas Yeah, it is actually game play graphics. Why would Unreal showcase their new graphics engine with a CG, out-of-engine trailer? These are in-engine, playable graphics with fixed camera movements. Every game out now does it. It's not a new thing. Get with it.
DJCompoz 3 days ago
@DJCompoz my bad, cheers dude.
PunkedPenguin 3 days ago
@DJCompoz pls learn about the engine engine is not a graphics it's the calculations on series of codes like how water works waves ect so jeah it is CGI on unreal 3 engine and no this is not game play graphics
kestazas 2 days ago
@kestazas Dude the Samaritan Demo is a REAL TIME demo. meaning its been rendered in real-time, on actual hardware. so no its not a pre-rendered video that you have incorrectly described as CGI.
So please learn about game engines because yes this is gameplay graphics...
Zetrox2k 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kestazas This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed this is not a CGI.
ballowers100 2 days ago
It will be cool to see gameplay because there's games out there that already have these graphics in trailer form (like this) .. looking good though.
PunkedPenguin 4 days ago
@PunkedPenguin Just to let you know this is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards not a cut-scene it is a demo of a game as it is not completed.
ballowers100 3 days ago
Comment removed
RavageCobra 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ballowers100 This isn't any game, as the title obviously states, it's just a demo of what Samaritan can accomplish. But whoever designed the demo should consider making a game, they seem to have talent.
P.S. That's a serious fucking run-on sentence you have going on
RavageCobra 3 days ago
@RavageCobra This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards you fool it is a game demo as it is not completed.
ballowers100 2 days ago
@ballowers100 Again, IT ISN'T A GAME. It's just showing what the new engine can do. They even said it themselves it isn't a game.
RavageCobra 2 days ago
Comment removed
ballowers100 1 day ago
@ballowers100 For the last time, THIS IS NOT A GAME THEY'RE WORKING ON. It's just gameplay of the engine showing it what it can do. I don't know what the fuck your prepubescent mind is thinking, but I'm not wasting my life like you arguing over something as simple as this to a child. Stupid. Fucking. Cunt.
RavageCobra 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RavageCobra This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is not a CGI or cut-scene learn how engines work fool.
ballowers100 19 hours ago
@RavageCobra It is still a game even if it is not completed.
ballowers100 19 hours ago
Speaking at DICE Summit 2012, reported by Develop, Epic founder Tim Sweeney said the technical wizardry of the Samaritan tech demo, which was running in Unreal Engine 3, required 2.5 teraFLOPS to run, LOLOLOLOL
909830 4 days ago
I'd say that Metro Last Light looks pretty similar to this demo graphically, will love to see the finished product.
MrRiadon 4 days ago
Anyone else thought of Inception when hearing the background?
AsianPandaGoneWild 4 days ago
Hay rumores de que la Wii U puede correr este motor o.O
THUNDERCRUSHER 4 days ago
@THUNDERCRUSHER De hecho no son rumores, ya han confirmado varias veces que Wii U es capaz de correr este motor y el CryEngine 3 a la perfeccion :D
TheVolvagia 3 days ago
not bad as CGI and no this not game play... and the hero so stupid no challenge fighting the "bad guys" thats boring and when he got lock chain w/e in his way his bad assnes ends cuz with all his superpowers he needs to weld that thing for hours and newer get it open I think he gave up there
kestazas 4 days ago
@kestazas Just to let you know this is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards not a CGI or cut-scene.
ballowers100 4 days ago
dear god please let this become a actual game
TheFoxshot 5 days ago
@TheFoxshot This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards it is a demo of a game as it is not completed but still playable.
ballowers100 4 days ago
you have to take the power of 10(!) playstations or xboxes to get such a grafic ;)
MrMoman7 5 days ago
I want they make a game
MrRonnieJamesDio 5 days ago
@MrRonnieJamesDio This is a game it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards.
ballowers100 4 days ago
Deus Ex??????????????????????
CHoran95 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unreal Engine 4 this year guys... :'D
MrCrytekz 5 days ago
Still waiting on a real game ;)
IzzyV15 6 days ago
Sick..cant wait till 2014
lewiscorp51 6 days ago
Config ????
ScreamGhostFace12345 6 days ago
Is that liam nelson? No wonder why hes awesome
underbow2 6 days ago
Be glad when consoles catch some what up with PC's
SpecOp85 6 days ago
@SpecOp85
Same, but a year after the new Xbox comes out they'll be another 2 generations behind :| This is the first gen I can think of where they're going to be properly out-done by PC's.
billybobjoeftw 5 days ago
WHAM!!!!..... AM READY FOR ROUND 2
Teshlakh 1 week ago
He seems to be a good character, definetly much better than Marcus Fenix. I wish this was more than a demo, but a future game for next gen consoles.
zesedentario 1 week ago
@zesedentario Just to let you know this demo is a game a game demo that is since it is not completed it is actual gameplay rendered in real time on 3 high end graphic cards.
ballowers100 1 week ago
why we havent seen graphichs like that? because developers are more focused on the old console harware than the modern harware if consoles didnt exist who knows maybe we alredy have close to reality graphichs
kunven 1 week ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Games would already look like this if they would be only made for PC and for max 3 year old PC's. I'm 100% sure i'd run this demo on my 2 years old laptop with 20 fps simply by turning tessalation off.
Eatmykum 1 week ago
Games would already look like this if they would be only made for PC and for max 3 year old PC's. I'm 100% sure i'd run this demo on my 2 years old laptop with 200 fps simply by turning tessalation off.
Eatmykum 1 week ago 3
Sadly you won't see any of this if the main focus for the developer is a console
AllonNL 1 week ago
@AllonNL Next gen consoles...
Current gen consoles catches on fire when watching these graphics.
TonyMontanaAlva 1 week ago 13
@TonyMontanaAlva The best part is, this is running on current-gen PC parts.
TheOneKnownAsMe1 5 days ago
@TonyMontanaAlva
it's funny cause uneal annouced this wont even be able to run on next gen consoles, though this was done ona pc, i guess console gamers just dont understand power
Jamman88888 4 days ago
@TonyMontanaAlva PC's yawn
bernie23232323232323 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is there anyone here that doesnt give two shits about all these arguments and can agree that this looks awesome?
MrAwsomeness1123 1 week ago
@R3leaZ
The GTX 580 is only.. 1.7TFlops or so, but the 7970 is only ~40% faster and it's something like double the TFlops. Nvidia and AMD GPU's aren't the same so comparing them directly isn't really possible.
billybobjoeftw 1 week ago
just saw a article with talking with epic game and they said next xbox would have to 10 times as powerful in all aspects to run this at 1080p 30 fpsand the development kits they have of next xbox right now is only 6x more powerful then 360 and that there trying to convince microsoft it needs to be more powerful
RaCeR063 1 week ago
beatiful game fantastic unreal engine
yo8164 1 week ago
so what this video wants to tell me is that this awesome shit is ingame graphics!? o.O Cuz if not, then cool... but nothing special cuz it's not like there haven't been awesome animations like this before...
MNFilms91 1 week ago
@MNFilms91
This is awesome because it's rendered in real time, not a pre-rendered scene iirc (it's 'gameplay' in a sense, not a cutscene).
billybobjoeftw 1 week ago