Added: 2 years ago
From: femr2
Views: 1,027
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • To be honest with you, such a high slim building, would be demolished from the top down, otherwise, if something goes wrong it could tip over and fall's all over Manhattan! The job of the core was in this case to center the collapse like a spindle in a juke box! This doesn't direct mean it was demolished, but it's the only way to destroy such a building! (if it's done with explosives)

  • @MrKoenig1985 the weight of the collapsing core pulled the perimeter inward

  • Possible explanation:

    The core columns were cut at an angle, the weight shifted to these exterior columns.

    Then these columns buckled inward.

  • Trottel, 100 %

    I

    I

    V

  • Inside Job!!

    100000000 %

  • An interesting theory and one that extends us towards awareness of the final seventh fold.

    In relation to the vid though. I suspect that there is still evidence at WTC that will reveal the level of the monstrosity. There is something still beneath the site that will be hot, even now. Pyroplastic flows and a disolving core.

    Inot our future, the gates open into a place where the pendulum will reaches its outermost swing and begin to return.

    The water is coming with the E

  • Damn... I though I found an astrophysicist from Fermilabs who was working on the collider and could shed light on what was to come.

    Never mind.

  • You know, I had a feeling I knew who you worked for, judging from you "name" here.

    Since you are who you are and work with "thoes kinds of people"....

    watch?v=wS7CZIJVxFY

    Thanks for expanding my mind a little. Please keep in touch... as much as they'll let you;)

    JC

  • Wonderful. I look forward to it!

    Keep up the good work with this thread.

    Not to stray you but... Chandra/Harvard press briefing, Q:"When will we pass through the gravitational plane?" A: "Everything is in the gravitational plane."

    Q: "When will we pass through the center?" A: "We already have in 1998. We are tens of light years above it."

    They were researching and experimenting with it as we passed, too.

    Galactic equator is a mathematical average of the N most and S most visable stars.

  • Stupid.... 50/50, at least. More ignorant and trusting, maybe?

    Hell, it took me three years to concider the idea of any wrong doing. Then, only last year did I start to look at scientific data.

    Also the "Your unAmerican if you question your President in a time of war," joined with the "Where did Jimmy go? He was arrested and now they say 'Jimmy Who?'"

    Many people like freedom instead of an extended stay at_____. (Insert secret detention camp in Pakastan here)

    Now, the tide may change.

  • Here's my theory as to "why?".

    watch?v=fjSPJTo51lM

    If you are fast on the draw, pause the motion as close to 12/21/2012 as you can. Keep your eye on 14Sgr.

    All roads have led me to this. Detours? Yes. Road blocks? Yes. But, even when you follow a well beaten path in the wrong direction, eventually you come back to this. If you have not, on my channel this is coupled with another vid on my vlog.

    (I hate that word 'vlog'... I am Vlog, the Impailer!)

  • Agreed. But what then? Who's gonna do anything? My concern is why.

    Peter Jennings, that day, said it. Theory after theory have shown it. Your videos are showing it.

    Does this call for revolution? This seems the last answer.

  • I assume you have seen the ideas of Dr. Judy Wood? The Hutchenson Experiments?

    At the end of this clip, the core didn't fall over or down.....

    In 2002 the Russians said the weapons the US were experimenting with were more serious than the Atomic Bomb. If, somehow, we have found a way to generate unlimited amounts of energy....

    Yea!!.... and, oh god, we're all fu*ked!

  • O.O

    shit man

    best 911 post i've seen in a long time

    and the lower core section at the end - looks like that was holding strong until it got exploded.

    i'm actually gonna share this video lol

  • Cool. If you're interested in core behaviours, I've uploaded a number of WTC1 core views recently. This one is very revealing:

    watch?v=yKzV1Pfyrl8

    the911forum. freeforums. org/wtc-1-core-remnant-motion-­t185. html

  • Just watched it - yeah, thats another excellent shot.

    And believe me, i'm interested, but i'm involved in other things right now. I'll be getting to the destructions soon hopefully. Have you seen many decent video analyses? I've not seen many.

  • Depends what you mean by analyses. Many of my videos are each a small analysis of a particular feature.

    Do you mean a 'global' physics, energetics or mechanics based 'movie' ? If so, no, only narrower presentations.

    If you mean small focussed videos, then sure, plenty.

    Topics ?

  • I guess i mean something that maps what we can see of the building on its way down - cores, wall sections, whatever can be tracked. I've never seen something like that.

    I get the feeling there's plenty that can be done regarding analysing the destructions. i feel like i should be concentrating on it myself, but like i say, i've got 911 stuff to do piling up left right and centre.

  • Oh, when i say "i've never seen something like that", that's excluding this clip

  • Well..I haven't begun to add any analysis to this clip, but I have about a hundred here on YT which are similar to this.

    I recommend visiting:

    the911forum. freeforums. org/wtc1-and-wtc2-f4. html

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more