Total magnetic flux through a closed surface is NOT always zero. That is faradays law of induction. The monopole travels through a magnet and keeps going perpetually.
If you disagree with me on this, explain to me Faradays law of induction. Go on proton ass clown. Go on electron ass clown. explain to me faradays law of induction. how does that wok if the electron is not the magnetic monopole.
i don't understand why the SO4-- travels "uphill", opposing the electric field. Is it because it prefers Zn++ over Cu++? Is the Zn++ attracting it that badly?
And what's the need for SO4- in the Zinc basin at the beginning?
I am talking about lecture 15, the revisit of the Kelwin Water Dropper. In this lecture, he does not explain the way the battery works, he is only showing what it can do.
@kotofu That's what he said. He said that is a quantum physics question when you ask how a battery works. You get a brief explanation in University chemistry class.
Exactly. I've seen software developers with *masters* degrees and 15 years of experience who still produce unusable spaghetti code.
What matters most is how much you think about the subject and the depth of your understanding. Knowledge alone is necessary but understanding makes the difference in the qualify of your work.
Total magnetic flux through a closed surface is NOT always zero. That is faradays law of induction. The monopole travels through a magnet and keeps going perpetually.
If you disagree with me on this, explain to me Faradays law of induction. Go on proton ass clown. Go on electron ass clown. explain to me faradays law of induction. how does that wok if the electron is not the magnetic monopole.
the battery you showed at the end, is it because of water being a bipolar molecule it induces the buckets that when sufficiently exposed to the polar H20, causes the development of pd.my guess is that the buckets a and b are of different material, thus resulting in difference of the polarity. the reason for the water to sprayed out: the interaction between induced charge on the surface of A/B with the polar H20, the induction influences the tip of the tong and causes a spark just like thunder
@44:03 why did he choose to draw the direction of the current I along the CCW path of the circuit? Wouldn't it be also possible to take the other CW route? I.e the shorter direction between + and - ?
glad to see you are still keeping with this. don't stop when you are bored with what you feel is remedial, it will reinforce your knowledge for when things get complex & you are grasping @straws again failing your basics.
REAL Free energy technology exists!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
everytime when I see a mistake I pause the video and open up my email to contact Mr.Lewin so that I can talk with him, but when I go back and play the video to reassess the mistake I find out that it has already been corrected and I miss my chance to talk with him :(
@royalsnowman actually it's a negative charge protons are to heavy to travel. it's actually the electrons do the traveling... from negative to positive... that's the physics of it anyway
@trentib69 Physically, you're right. Electrons are the ones that are moving. However, a negative charge moving in a direction is mathematically the same as positive charge moving in the opposite direction.
@kirbuschrist There are two currents --- Conventional current is + to -. Electronic current is - to +. Sorry, forgot to add the word "Conventional" because most of our current that we're dealing with are mostly conventional ones
If V1 has a higher potential than V2, then it charges battery V2 (energy transfer, like capacitors). But, in this case, current can't flow at battery V1 as is pointed above.
Okay, let's say that problem is solved, and that for sake of preventing algebraic headache, you are correct.
In assignment 3.7 I found even more complicated circuit, with three batteries and five resistors. "More food for 'algebraic headache' ". ;-)
Is that only me that noticed error after time [38:16] (in explanation about Kirchhoff law), that current from the left battery is pointed in wrong direction? It should be counter clockwise, or from plus pole of the battery, through the series resistor to the minus pole of the same battery. I think also that because of that, math is also wrong.
It is not wrong! In the end he says I1 is negative ...
At the begining you define your I in one direction , but after solving the equations you might find out, that the current flows into the other direction (negative sign)
But, all the time we are subtracting current, which is more confusing.
Let's then calculate sum of currents.
I1=(-3A), I2=(+1A)
Then: -I1+I2=I3 = (-3A)+(+1A)=(-2A)
That is only if current flows as pink chalk points. Note that from battery V1, current flows from minus to plus (it can't be!), but from battery V2 currents flows from plus to minus (that is correct).
If you look at "real" battery orientation, and know that current flows from plus to minus, then:
I1= (+3A), I2=(+1A)
And:
I1+I2=I3 = (+3A)+(+1A)=(+4A)
---
Let's imagine two batteries of 1.5V, R1, R2 and R3 are three equal light bulbs, then try to connect it as is shown on the diagram. In one case, light bulbs R1 and R2 will glow, but R3 will not.
Reverse just one battery, then R1 and R2 will glows equally, but weaker than R3 - which will glow with sum of crts. from R1 and R2
I short circuited a car battery before and let me tell you...I almost wield my hand on the car battery, along with the wrench. To make matters worst, it was raining that day (don't ask). Me = stupid. Yes.
so our m.i.t. physics are grade ten Quebec equivalent, and your grammar classes are vastly superior??...Hmm why dont Canadians do shit except make bacon and wish they were Americans LOL!!!
...Wow. If you really are an MIT student, which I doubt you are, you're spelling and grammar is frankly pitiful, meanwhile, I make a typo and I'm the idiot? Please get a life...
I am an American doing studies in Switzerland. On top of the language barrier, I have a lot of professors that are great researchers, but not so great in the classroom. This guy is saving my grade. THANK YOU MIT
@acerie "Today, a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration — that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively." ... "Here's Tom with the weather"
I don't know if I agree with the proposition that the SO4 flows from right to left. As it is disposited knowhere, the inital status of equal density left and right is never changed. It seems more logical that the positive zinc and copper ions flow from left to right to equalize densities (assuming for simplicity that the initial solution consists of Cu++, Zi++ and SO4--)
A very good teacher who explains things quite clearly and you can see this guy has the passion for science or physics
bladervinay 1 hour ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe Batteries EMF,Energy Conservation ,Power,Kirchhoff's Rules,Circuits after you give this
Kricardose 2 weeks ago
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge Batteries EMF,Energy Conservation ,Power,Kirchhoff's Rules,Circuits
bebeheuy 2 weeks ago
Steady I Really Like This Video Batteries EMF,Energy Conservation,Power,Kirchhoff's Rules,Circuits
Mjhond 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Total magnetic flux through a closed surface is NOT always zero. That is faradays law of induction. The monopole travels through a magnet and keeps going perpetually.
If you disagree with me on this, explain to me Faradays law of induction. Go on proton ass clown. Go on electron ass clown. explain to me faradays law of induction. how does that wok if the electron is not the magnetic monopole.
clay0n 1 month ago
ehm ich bin eine gummi puppe
NorineJunkovs678 1 month ago
The sulfuric acid will boil, the case may melt, and that's no good. Lmao
apheus27 3 months ago
Trippiest part: 39:26
Uh oh!
brianwesleyan 3 months ago
Can the Water, In the Final Demonstration, Be In a Contibnous Stream From Top to Bottom? Is the Water Conductive or Nonconductive?
mdgreg 3 months ago
You awakened the love & interest for Physics inside me :)
CuriousKirchhoff 3 months ago 5
And if you go 80 mph, you will teleport!
Top3percent 3 months ago
Doc Brown?
Top3percent 3 months ago
omfg he teaches so well it makes me angry :(((
weweallthewayhome 3 months ago
i don't understand why the SO4-- travels "uphill", opposing the electric field. Is it because it prefers Zn++ over Cu++? Is the Zn++ attracting it that badly?
And what's the need for SO4- in the Zinc basin at the beginning?
blabla791 3 months ago in playlist MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002
explanation to the Kelvin Water Dropper in lecture 15. Start at about the 28th minute. Enjoy!
kotofu 9 months ago
@kotofu
44min not 28
ryry46d9 9 months ago
@ryry46d9
I am talking about lecture 15, the revisit of the Kelwin Water Dropper. In this lecture, he does not explain the way the battery works, he is only showing what it can do.
kotofu 9 months ago
@kotofu That's what he said. He said that is a quantum physics question when you ask how a battery works. You get a brief explanation in University chemistry class.
Paladin1warrior 7 months ago
Guys it doesn't matter at which grade or uni you study something....It matters if you understand it and using it.
13Septem13 10 months ago
@13Septem13
Exactly. I've seen software developers with *masters* degrees and 15 years of experience who still produce unusable spaghetti code.
What matters most is how much you think about the subject and the depth of your understanding. Knowledge alone is necessary but understanding makes the difference in the qualify of your work.
LegendLength 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Total magnetic flux through a closed surface is NOT always zero. That is faradays law of induction. The monopole travels through a magnet and keeps going perpetually.
If you disagree with me on this, explain to me Faradays law of induction. Go on proton ass clown. Go on electron ass clown. explain to me faradays law of induction. how does that wok if the electron is not the magnetic monopole.
clay0n 11 months ago
the battery you showed at the end, is it because of water being a bipolar molecule it induces the buckets that when sufficiently exposed to the polar H20, causes the development of pd.my guess is that the buckets a and b are of different material, thus resulting in difference of the polarity. the reason for the water to sprayed out: the interaction between induced charge on the surface of A/B with the polar H20, the induction influences the tip of the tong and causes a spark just like thunder
Funyima2010 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE watch my video on the Electrinium battery.
electricitymagnetism 11 months ago
@44:03 why did he choose to draw the direction of the current I along the CCW path of the circuit? Wouldn't it be also possible to take the other CW route? I.e the shorter direction between + and - ?
mdinka 1 year ago
@mdinka sorry, i meant @00:44
mdinka 1 year ago
glad to see you are still keeping with this. don't stop when you are bored with what you feel is remedial, it will reinforce your knowledge for when things get complex & you are grasping @straws again failing your basics.
circusboy90210 1 year ago
@circusboy90210
Strangely I found the first couple of lectures the hardest, although they were still fun to watch.
LegendLength 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
graywackeknifebdr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Oil companies are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common people.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity now.
Look for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in youtube video search. Join the Revolution!!
glennjgd 1 year ago
Anyone else catch the asian guy sleeping at 31:24?
kidmystik101 1 year ago 26
@kidmystik101 he is not sleeping thats how asian's eyes look like.
sylfix 2 months ago
Requesting a HD video of a car battery being shorted out for a long time. I have not been able to find one yet on youtube.
treven314 1 year ago
everytime when I see a mistake I pause the video and open up my email to contact Mr.Lewin so that I can talk with him, but when I go back and play the video to reassess the mistake I find out that it has already been corrected and I miss my chance to talk with him :(
mrgzcreations 1 year ago
I wish I had teachers like this when I was in school he is the best teacher I have ever seen.
darat23 1 year ago 17
But still, he is the best physics teacher in the universe
royalsnowman 1 year ago
Oh no. He got mixed up with the Kirchoff law. It should be the other way round. Anyone disagree?
royalsnowman 1 year ago
@royalsnowman yes i disagree bigtime
MrJavaHelp 1 year ago
Help! Wasn't it the E symbol meant electron flow? Why did the prof. say it's electric field?
afdhalatifftan92 2 years ago
As far as I can tell it's always been Electric Field. Electron flow would be current, denoted by capital i
Mattprole 2 years ago
Sorry, but you're incorrect. Current = flow of positive charge.
royalsnowman 1 year ago
@royalsnowman actually it's a negative charge protons are to heavy to travel. it's actually the electrons do the traveling... from negative to positive... that's the physics of it anyway
trentib69 1 year ago
@trentib69 Physically, you're right. Electrons are the ones that are moving. However, a negative charge moving in a direction is mathematically the same as positive charge moving in the opposite direction.
royalsnowman 1 year ago
@royalsnowman Current flows from negative to positive.
kirbuschrist 1 year ago
@kirbuschrist There are two currents --- Conventional current is + to -. Electronic current is - to +. Sorry, forgot to add the word "Conventional" because most of our current that we're dealing with are mostly conventional ones
royalsnowman 1 year ago
current is capital I.
E is electric field, not electron flow.
teledynepost 2 years ago
i = current, e= emf = voltage
ncbookz 2 years ago
@ncbookz doesn't the voltage = potential difference?
lovbinfr3sh 1 year ago
@lovbinfr3sh yes
GunsNRosesbitches 10 months ago
that chalk is so awesome...
tkshoe 2 years ago
Wrong!
The network is definetly assymetric, this nullifying your assumption above.
In the above network the following assumption might be true: V1 has a higher potential than V2 and R2<< R3
Check out assignment 3.7
Airmack 2 years ago
If V1 has a higher potential than V2, then it charges battery V2 (energy transfer, like capacitors). But, in this case, current can't flow at battery V1 as is pointed above.
Okay, let's say that problem is solved, and that for sake of preventing algebraic headache, you are correct.
In assignment 3.7 I found even more complicated circuit, with three batteries and five resistors. "More food for 'algebraic headache' ". ;-)
CrazyScience 2 years ago
Is that only me that noticed error after time [38:16] (in explanation about Kirchhoff law), that current from the left battery is pointed in wrong direction? It should be counter clockwise, or from plus pole of the battery, through the series resistor to the minus pole of the same battery. I think also that because of that, math is also wrong.
Anyone else noticed that?
CrazyScience 2 years ago
It is not wrong! In the end he says I1 is negative ...
At the begining you define your I in one direction , but after solving the equations you might find out, that the current flows into the other direction (negative sign)
Airmack 2 years ago 2
If we assume that current flows according to arrow (pink chalk on blackboard), then yes: I1=+3A, I2=+1A, then I3=3-1=2 (+2A).
If we look at the battery orientation, then I3=3+1=4 (+4A). That is huge difference!
On second example, if: I1=+1A, I2=+1A, then I3=0, ONLY !!! if we follow that pink chalk arrow, ignoring REAL battery orientation.
If we ignore wrongly drawn arrow, then I3=2A.
CrazyScience 2 years ago
But, that is not my point. Look it at this way: Almost 30 000 views of this video, but ONLY ONE (me) dare to complain about that confusing error.
So, for ~30 000 ignorant people, everything is just fine - but, only one complains.
Statistically looking, that is negligible number of people who dare to complain about something not so important in our everyday life.
CrazyScience 2 years ago
Now, imagine how is easy to manipulate with mass of people over the media (newspapers, TV, radio...).
Imagine that over the internet you CAN complain, and maybe someone will agree with you, because of possibility of 'two way communication'.
But, if you look news on your TV, newspaper, or listen radio, you CAN'T complain, because nobody will agree with you, and you know that very well.
'(Al)mighty people' behind TV screen are well aware of that, so nobody care if you are misinformed.
CrazyScience 2 years ago
The things you are saying are still wrong. There is no difference in which way you draw the flow of the current. As can be easily proven
equation from prof.:
I1-I2=I3 = 3A-1A=2A
Equation with I3 in other direction :
I1=-3A
I2=1A
-I1-I2=I3 = 3A-1A=2A same as above.
As i said, IT DOESN'T matter how you draw it. The equations show wether you drawed it 'wrong'.
Your battery orientation, isn't worth anything, as there might still go some current through one batt due to a high potential of the other
Airmack 2 years ago
But, all the time we are subtracting current, which is more confusing.
Let's then calculate sum of currents.
I1=(-3A), I2=(+1A)
Then: -I1+I2=I3 = (-3A)+(+1A)=(-2A)
That is only if current flows as pink chalk points. Note that from battery V1, current flows from minus to plus (it can't be!), but from battery V2 currents flows from plus to minus (that is correct).
CrazyScience 2 years ago
Comment removed
CrazyScience 2 years ago
If you look at "real" battery orientation, and know that current flows from plus to minus, then:
I1= (+3A), I2=(+1A)
And:
I1+I2=I3 = (+3A)+(+1A)=(+4A)
---
Let's imagine two batteries of 1.5V, R1, R2 and R3 are three equal light bulbs, then try to connect it as is shown on the diagram. In one case, light bulbs R1 and R2 will glow, but R3 will not.
Reverse just one battery, then R1 and R2 will glows equally, but weaker than R3 - which will glow with sum of crts. from R1 and R2
CrazyScience 2 years ago
Buddy , your math is terribly wrong here:
I1=(-3A) => -I1 =3A but you state that it is -3A which is obviously wrong
Airmack 2 years ago
Oh, yes... my fault. You see - I got an 'algebraic headache'. :-)
Now, I see why people not like think about that or similar problems.
CrazyScience 2 years ago
I'm watching these videos instead attending my own college's course and learning better.
thanks to MIT and Youtube from Turkey
pornopolitik 2 years ago
outstanding professor.
freezzertime 2 years ago 4
does anyone know the theory of the final experiment? that is interesting
tengoliver 2 years ago 2
It's called the "Water Drop Experiment" by Lord Kelvin, or "The Waterthread Experiment" by Viktor Schauberger. Have fun googling :)
stradijeri 2 years ago
Awesome, I'm going to school to learn about electrics at MIT, awesome.
Currently I am learning about Capacitors, Resistors, and NPN Transistors, and PNP Transistors.
This is some heavy duty stuff, thanx MIT and YouTube.
UserIsAnFBIAgent 2 years ago 3
thats good good luck.
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
this guy is cool i think.
waterpowerisreal 2 years ago 3
23:34
fandennis 2 years ago
Eu sou técnico em eletrica aqui no Brasil e esta aula é demais!!!! Very Good!!!!
heltonsouza247 2 years ago
I dont know... how is a laptop my supply. And how is the resistance infinitely large when it isnt there..
mademedoit 3 years ago
This is amazing how in depth it really gets, my plan is to go to MIT for engineering, but this is interesting!
celisto001 3 years ago 2
I short circuited a car battery before and let me tell you...I almost wield my hand on the car battery, along with the wrench. To make matters worst, it was raining that day (don't ask). Me = stupid. Yes.
lowfat422 3 years ago 4
Shame that he's picked up that students (and instructors) often say "battery" when they mean "cell". But an excellent lecturer nonetheless.
petethepotato 3 years ago
@petethepotato
It's a single cell battery.
LegendLength 9 months ago
The best point of the lecture was:
Partner produces heat as twice effective as an electrical blanket.
So use a partner when u wana go to bed in winters.
apparent123 3 years ago
"So a partner is about twice as effective as an electric blanket. Maybe also more fun."
LMAO. It's even more funny when a guy like him does that.
gamesguru 3 years ago 2
Wow...isn't this kid of basic for MIT? Here in Quebec we do this in grade 10.
epicvelocity 3 years ago
hows the spelling classes in Quebec?
metalminded 3 years ago
Obviously vastly superior to the grammar classes where you live.
epicvelocity 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so our m.i.t. physics are grade ten Quebec equivalent, and your grammar classes are vastly superior??...Hmm why dont Canadians do shit except make bacon and wish they were Americans LOL!!!
metalminded 3 years ago
...Wow. If you really are an MIT student, which I doubt you are, you're spelling and grammar is frankly pitiful, meanwhile, I make a typo and I'm the idiot? Please get a life...
epicvelocity 3 years ago
OH! Sorry! ***your spelling and grammar classes!*** -.-
epicvelocity 3 years ago
metalminded what a load of shit us Americans could only dream to be Canadians.
VenomFangXposed 3 years ago 2
You guys are really weird. And everyone knows it's the University of Chicago students who can spell and grammatize. :p
rkt739 3 years ago
owned!! Indeed, you're metal minded, so we see americans have such limited mind..
celisto001 3 years ago
John Nash was a American
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you guys are really weird. O_o. everyone knows that some people sucks at grammers, regardless of where they take classes.
Dynamics18 3 years ago
I think it gets a little harder
jsymons1985 3 years ago 2
I am an American doing studies in Switzerland. On top of the language barrier, I have a lot of professors that are great researchers, but not so great in the classroom. This guy is saving my grade. THANK YOU MIT
acerie 3 years ago 23
Yes - he's very good, isn't he?
jonahansen 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@acerie "Today, a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration — that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively." ... "Here's Tom with the weather"
sn1pe352 7 months ago
I don't know if I agree with the proposition that the SO4 flows from right to left. As it is disposited knowhere, the inital status of equal density left and right is never changed. It seems more logical that the positive zinc and copper ions flow from left to right to equalize densities (assuming for simplicity that the initial solution consists of Cu++, Zi++ and SO4--)
sddfdhgdf 3 years ago
Awesome vid.
"Not only is that stupid, it's very dangerous. Let's do it"
128j128 3 years ago 44
I watched this vid for the last 6 minutes about the kelvin thunderstorm thing. When does he say what you cited? Sounds interesting lol
FHomeBrew 3 years ago
I made one for my son in year 10 about 20 years ago. His teacher pulled it apart to find the electronics.
CaspaB 3 years ago 3
He should've left the wrench on the car battery hehehe.
Glendale1901 4 years ago