@cameron20101000 reason why it was rated T cuz it was censor BUT like i said censorship does not change gameplay
if you look at WOLF3D on snes it may have bad graphics but it has very fluent control and smooth gameplay which i kinda like better than WOLF3D on jaguar
and not to mention its not the graphics that make the games good
@killkenny5000 Still, graphics can have some importance to the game. If they get TOO bad, then there's no way to tell what the hell is going on. Think of what Wolfenstein 3D would look like on the regular NES (not the SNES), and picture you moving farther and farther away from an enemy as he gets more and more pixely. You couldn't tell him apart from the background because the graphics are way too bad. That's an example of how graphics could matter in some cases.
@killkenny5000 Actually, you can make the graphics better through texture packs. Regardless, graphics only matter if you can't see what you're doing. Imagine a screen that's only 3 by three pixels. That may be fine for a tic tac toe game, but if you wanted to play a first person shooter in that resolution, how are you going to know what you're doing? You wouldn't be able to see sh*t. Like I said: That's the ONLY time that graphics matter.
@killkenny5000 I've played the Saturn port. The frame rate freaking sucks. I have no idea why, because the saturn is much more powerful than the SNES, and yet it's still a very laggy frame rate. And Doom is a 2D game made to look 3D. The Saturn should've been GREAT for it because it was meant for 2D games more than it was meant for 3D games. But no. Somehow, no.
Saturn version actually uses a full 3D-engine (Slavedriver), so you can freely look around, unlike PSX and N64. Which is probably why it's a bit slower and controls are a bit awkward. They apparently went with as Saturn does go well with the "2.5D engine" that Duke3D and Doom uses as demonstrated with the Doom port of Saturn.
I just wanted to ask. why did they make a Duke Nukem without any nude women. I'm not saying that they should be everywhere in the game but that picture on the wall at 0:34, (on the Duke Nukem i hav on the PC) she is butt naked and on the projector in the movie theater, she is naked too. so why did they changed? I played Duke Nukem on xbox, the psp port of Duke Nukem and another Duke Nukem version on PC and most women were clothed. so I ask, Why did they change it?
I just wanted to ask. why did they make a Duke Nukem without any nude women. I'm not saying that they should be everywhere in the game but that picture on the wall at 0:34, (on the Duke Nukem i hav on the PC) she is butt naked and on the projector in the movie theater, she is naked too. so why did they changed? I played Duke Nukem on xbox, the psp port of Duke Nukem and another Duke Nukem version on PC and most women were clothed. so I ask, Why did they change it?
I think that the genesis one is far more superior. I recently did a review with a friend of mine where we discussed a lot of the deeper meanings and poetic metaphors behind the game. A lot of people don't realize what Duke Nukem stands for, what with the remake that came out a few months ago for the PS3 and Gamecube, a lot of people are thinking it's about manliness and being a boy. But it's not. It's more than that.
It seems the PSX version has higher quality versions of the original Duke Talk samples from the PC. Nifty! Ripping those would be helpful in making a high quality sound pack or something.
@theretrogamerno1 having a first person shooter on sega genesis or mega drive is a pretty cool way to do on genesis but the i cant believe how bad a first person shooter can actually get screwed up it wasnt that choppy but the difficulty and did not used the doom engine instead used the wolfenstein engine
saturn is very underrated. I own one and i am really happy with the quality.... is probably because it has 2 cpus so is harder for dev to optimize the game to fully utilize saturn
The PS1 version was kinda shitty and slow compared to the PC- version, but still playable. I've got the Saturn version too among a couple of other games , never played it though, haven't found cheap enough Saturn yet lol.
I've always heard that the Saturn port was worst in every detail.The Saturn had better 2D hardware than the PSX, but 3D...sorry, but no.I've played them both, and even though I don't think the Saturn's port is not awful like everyone I've heard talking about it, the PSX takes the entire cake in this department.In my infancy I've had SEGA, in my chilhood/teen years I've had SONY...and even though I love them both(and NES/SNES/PC too), I think the PSX is the best console ever.It's just my opinion.
This debate has raged since both versions came out.
I like the sat version over ps1 but it IS barebones, the upside is that there is a hidden version of Deathtank in it , and "Jevon's controls" make is playable though both sadly are VERY limited.
Thankfully there is a remake on pc that is the best of both worlds and then some with 3d models and lighting taken form the "polymost" engine.
That and there will be ANOTHER remake using DNF's UT3 engine(waiting for it.)
Yes, but graphics and framerate aren't everything. The Saturn is missing levels, has simplified levels almost no scripting, no rotating or moving sectors, worse controls, and is slower.
@elbryan42 But then... which is better Rob? PSX? or The Saturn? Because when I get a PS2 I might get Duke Nukem Total Meltdown. I wonder what the PSX is like... The PSX has very good graphics and fast paced music. That's my opinion.
@elbryan42 Now that I think about it... I like the PSX version a lot more. It's faster, and the music is better paced. Better graphics. Better everything.
@elbryan42 So the PSX version wins? Also, I have a question. 'Bout the PSX version. I heard that if you play it on a PS2 the textures and sprites get smoother. I read it on an Amazon review... Unless I must be hearing things....
@elbryan42 yep, i had a lot of fun with the saturn version, though people trash it cuz of pc.......but at that time console owners knew they werent getting pc quality. hell, my dad finally bought a decent pc for over 2000 dollars!!!
You know, for as much as I cut down the Saturn version, I really do appreciate the support Lobotomy gave to the Saturn. Too bad barely any other companies supported it in North America. The system wasn't perfect, but it should've done better than it did.
frankly I think most critics and sadly , gamers, don't give the Saturn enough credit in the capability department (they like to claim its vastly weaker than the PS)
anyways, I like all 3 console versions , each one has something the other lacks, wheter in the technical department or content.
and I actually find the controls are fine on the Saturn , though I agree the simplication is a bit of a negative (same goes for the censorship on the N64)
@elbryan42 i hate to say it, but conseptualy the saturn was a great system, and was realistically the only system some arcade ports could play on due to better 2d support. but saturn was such a nightmare to program for... correct me if im wrong but it had 2 processors in a time when no one had two processors, and on top of that, they were two different processors.
i loke many of its games, but the system was such a mess.
Oh, I love the system. The 2D capabilities were outstanding. Sega did right with the Saturn and the Dreamcast, since they modeled the systems off of their arcade hardware at the time. Unfortunately, the Saturn wasn't made for 3D. Which is why it's outstanding that Lobotomy did such an outstanding job getting 3D to run so well.
The problem is, the problems with Saturn Duke are mainly design decisions. Some of it is surely due to the limitations of the Slavedriver engine (like rotating sectors, horizontalally moving sectors and such). But many of the problems like a lower field of vision, the slower speed, the missing levels, the overall lack of scripting, the too basic controls (with autoducking, yuck), all were obvious design choices that could've been avoided. They changed the core game of Duke3D for whatever reason.
Commendable, yes, that they did it. But they could've done so much better. Quake on the Saturn was SO much better. Obviously the Saturn and the Slavedriver engine was capable of so much more than what they offered in Saturn Duke3D.
Saturn In reality the Saturn is much worse. The graphics and framerate are the only thing that's better. The architecture in the levels is simplified, there are levels cut out, as well as parts of levels. The controls are much worse than the PSX, the game runs at about 80% of the speed of other ports. The PSX has much more, varied music. The Saturn has less interactivity, no rotating sectors, no subways or transports, and very little scripting.
The Saturn port is beautiful, but it's bare bones.
@elbryan42 Is it me or the PSX port looks like it has more detail and brighter colours, and it also has much clearer sound too. The N64 version looks smoother with better effects but the game looks a little more bland, typical with all N64 games. The Saturn port looks inferior in my opinion, its darker and paler, it runs smoother but the awful controls destroys that playability. The Saturn is bare bones in gameplay and bare bones in graphics too.
It does have that exclusive bonus level "Urea 51", though it's not much, and it's kinda cool it has a real 3D-engine, even though the controls are a bit odd, but at least I got used to it.
@elbryan42 The Saturn port is pretty lacking but the worst port of all time is the Sega Genesis version. It's Godawful, I heard that you can't even turn while moving.
Being on the Genesis, and made as a cash in for Brazil (which is one of many cheap releases there for the Genesis and Master System). Yes, you can turn in it. And it would be great as an FPS on the Genesis (considering what the Genesis is capable of). Except, the challenge is maddening. The enemies hit you for a lot of health, and they're too damn accurate. Honestly, if they fixed the difficulty, it would stand alongside Zero Tolerance as a great Genesis shooter.
the textures are horribly aligned in the saturn version. and wtf is up with the cam tilting when duke is turning? And judging by the general feel, I'd not be surprised if someone told me they had used an other game engine on the saturn.
Agreed. The few things that I didn't like was the lack of music and lack of parallaxed skies. Also, I couldn't get used to the constant lookspring. But overall, it was a great product with plenty of new content not in any other Duke Nukem game. Plus 4 player split screen was amazing!
How Goldeneye and Perfect Dark stayed as popular as they did when there was Duke Nukem 64 (and Hexen 64) is completely beyond me.
The Playstation version is the more complete game. The Saturn port is quite acomplished for sprite biased machine....Lobotomy knew how to get the best out of Sega's underdog hardware. But when it comes to DN3D the PS port wins hands down.
Yes, but the Saturn version is missing levels, is missing almost all of the scripting, has simplified environments, less interactivity, and runs at roughly 80% of the speed of all other Duke 3D games. Graphics aren't everything.
Simplified environments? And i take it the PSX version has everything like the pc version right? The Saturn isnt missing levels. The PSX version has an extra Episode which is not present in the pc version, plus one extra level. I own the PSX version of Duke btw, and i would love it for you to explain to me where the PSX version is more interactive. And i thought the percentage was a nice touch, im pretty sure that number is accurate. Graphics arent everything, i agree...
The PSX version has everything from the first three episodes on the PC. There's very few cases where there's a window missing or a missing mirror, but architecture is almost the exact same, with all secret areas.
The Saturn version is missing the levels Spin Cycle, Lunatic Fringe, Tier Drops and Freeway. Not to mention half of Hotel Hell is gone.
The Saturn version has less Duke sayings, less light switches, no going to the bathroom, missing secret areas, and almost no scripting.
I will name you a better version than the PSX, the Saturn one. Quite simply i own BOTH games, i finished them on both machines, and when it comes to fun, frame rate, textures you name it, the Saturn version blows teh PSX out of the water. The only differences are some moving objects that dont move on the Saturn version, like on Death row level, but besides that, Saturn wons hands down. I will sell you my PSX copy of duke if you liek it so much.
@fiaisguy I already got the PSX version, also owned the Saturn version.
The PSX version is more faithful to the PC version, it's faster than the saturn version, has better sounds and the graphics may not be par with the saturn version, but the saturn has some cut parts.
Better sounds? For someone that owns or owned both versions, i disagree, but sure i can go with the PSX having better sound. More faithfull to the pc, not really, there are differences in the levels like there are on the Saturn due to limitations. The PSX has an extra episode not present on the pc version and therefore not on the Saturn, however Saturn has one exclusive secret level. You have to joking about the Saturn being a butchered port. That is just ridiculous.
@fiaisguy I did mention the lightning effects of the saturn, but there are some parts where i would think, how is that possible ?
Some places were supposed to be dark, but they weren't.
The PSX version has some framerate issues, but it doesn't feel slow like the Saturn version, the saturn also has some strange textures, really strange, it seems like Duke is small.
I surely did play the Saturn version, the music was awesome, very faithfull to the original.
Agreed with some rough textures, same on some parts on the PSX.
Dont get me worng, the PSX version is in my opinion inferior, but it is not a bad game. I had fun with it. BUt the Saturn version is better, and it is a technical feat as well. The game is balanced and fun and with the 3d control pad its a blast to control.
It comes down to what you like the most. Some technical achievements are hard to ignore, but other than that they are both two good games.
... But constant frame rate is. And the Saturn blows the PSX version out of the water. The game is smoother, faster and really fun to play. I have both versions and i had fun with the PSX version, but the extra episode is garbage, and the game has to many shortcomings. I have been seeing a lot of your videos, but i really should stop. For someone who isnt biased, you sure fool me.
I keep meaning to make a real comparison video for the Saturn vs PSX. The levels are very simplified on the Saturn. The Saturn does run slower, but smoother. Everything, even the enemies falling is slower, as if the game clock is running at about 80% of the speed. I'm completely objective, and the PSX version does have some flaws like framerate and choppy framerate. But the Saturn has nothing special about it. It's a bare bones FPS game with a Duke Nukem 3D skin.
The Saturn port has almost no scripting, no moving sectors (subways, transports), no rotating sectors, and is pretty lifeless. Duke to me isn't about the naughtiness or gore, to me it's great ideas, inventiveness, and a game environment that really jumps out at you.
Like I said, besides shooting, there's not much to see in Saturn Duke. I can make videos to prove my point.
About the extra PSX ep, your opinion. I respect it, even if I don't agree with it. It's new content.
The Saturn had Death Tank and Urea 51 as new content. The PSX version has 5 new levels, new enemies and new graphics. The N64 version has new weapons and ammo, extra content from The Birth episode, new parts of levels in episodes 1 and 3 and new graphics and references. On top of that, the Saturn is missing the most of the original content. The N64 replaced content, the Saturn just cut it out.
And in what way is the PSX version faster? If you are talking about framerate the Saturn runs at a clear higher speed, being the fastest of the two. The video right here proves it, and there is no slow down, unlike the PSX port. Did i mention the Lighting effects the Saturn has and the PSX doesnt? The only thing i find clearly better on the PSX is some sounds, namely Duke´s one liners... And thats about it.
@PersonaBrazil Have you actual played the PS1 version, you'd be suprised how good it is. The PC original is always going to be the no 1 choice but the Playstation one is a brilliant port. I use to have the Saturn version and I've got to say Lobotomy did an amazing job (they had to rewrite the game code) as they did with Quake (stunning, better than the N64 one) and Exhumed (Powerslave), but the PS1 version of DN still gets my vote.
The Saturn version looked smoother and less pixelated but had less detail in some of the textures. The draw distance was shorter than the PS1 versions also.. plus it had that weird camera tilt effect when you walked around.
Actually, not it isn't. Duke Nukem 3D for the Saturn is missing tons of stuff. Most of the scripting is gone, most of Duke's sayings are gone, most interactivity is gone, a bunch of levels are missing, the gameplay's much slower, the controls are seriously crippled, the levels are drastically simplified, most of the music is gone, and such.
Duke Nukem 3D for the Saturn is a very sad excuse for a port. The graphics are the ONLY thing that's better compared to the PSX and N64 ports.
lol it seems like everyone takes the same path in the first level, drop down, get the bazooka, jump into the invisible wall, jump out the other side and kill the monster near the flaming dumpster, then blow open the wall with the bazooka
You forget about the Saturn version's strange camera sway when you turn after not too long. Crazy how it seems tp have full lighting everywhere, I can't believe it's realtime but maybe it is. Makes the game seem grittier and grimier, which suits it very well.
Duke Nukem 3D on PC = The original and funnier version,
Duke Nukem on the Sega Saturn = Most serious version of the sondtrack's which gives you a felling of immersion onto the game,
Duke Nukem 3D on the ps1 = The adrenaline rush version, fast and kick as remixs,
Duke Nukem 3D on the N64 = The version which changed the most, interesting to discover, you'll fell like playing duke 3D all over again with all the differences, unfortunately censored...
Duke Nukem 3D on PC = The original and funnier version,
Duke Nukem 3D on the ps1 = The adrenaline rush version, fast and kick as remixs,
Duke Nukem on the Sega Saturn = Most serious version of the sondtrack's which gives you a felling of immersion onto the game,
Duke Nukem 3D on the N64 = The version which changed the most, interesting to discover, you'll fell like playing duke 3D all over again with all the differences, unfortunately censored...
The Saturn has some interesting features, but in many ways it bites the dust compared to the PSX version. The animation of dying enemies is speed up, the pistol shoots slower, much of the original art is NOT included, levels being split up in 2 parts, the PSX version has also much better controls.
quite similar to pc version. I wonder why there was nothing like Quake for psx, until quake come on PC and suddenly psx become able to cope with quake II.
rofl the sarurn graphics remind me the "jaguar" console and also its so funny to wtch ppl say that the saturn version was better when the prodicers of the game admit they couldnt do nothing more to help saturn ...
owned both versions & there was NO CONTEST,the saturn version bent the PS version over & f***ed it raw!The saturn was ALOT smoother & faster,I gave my PS copy away after I got the saturn version.I played the N64 version & that was just as bad as the PS version but made even worse by being censored!
i wonder what happend to my copy? heh heh. but i do have it for the PC also, i'd have to say, the psx port is far more better than the sega, but that's just my opinion, i think the best ports of the game are PSX Duke and N64 Duke, even though it's censored, it's still good, even has references not in the pc version such as lo wang! good video, keep it up!
@domymbd whatttttt?????? if the N64 version have not effects, is censored, the steroids are vitamin, the nude girls are a stupid announcement, ths dark light didnt exist... the N64 is teh worst...
1. PC version
2. PSX version
3. Saturn version (maybe 3 and 4 must have same place, saving teh differences)
4. N64 version... (because transform the origianl game in a kids game)
This looks terrible. The PC Version is what made this game popular as with most any shooter, it's just console fanboys are pretty clueless as to how and why these games even exist.
I used to play both versions back in the day, The saturn version played much better the controls the framerate were better and all the hidden stuff to added a lot
It's actually running on a different engine, the same one used for Exhumed. It's proof positive that the Saturn CAN do good 3D if you rub it the right way.
I like the Dynamic lighting in the Saturn version, but it is missing things like swinging doors. >_> Curious though is that the movie posters are different inside the movie theatre in the PSX version, similarly to the N64 version.
For the this era ports, I like the N64 version because it's more original. If I had to pick between the two though I'd pick the PSX version due to the additional episode. Urea51 on the Saturn was a lame level. Sorry Lobotomy. :P
I honestly didn't expect the Saturn versino to look better, but the Playstation version definitely wins in the sound department. From what I read, true 3d games on Saturn weren't easy to come by. I'm guessing that's partly due to the Saturn being difficult to program for? In the Saturn version, the camera seems more dynamic whereas the Playstation version was more stationary. However from the looks of things, this seems to be a hindrance to gameplay. Besides, we all know who won the 32-bit wars.
The playstation version reminds me of Doom but good though.
The playstation port is always better than sega saturn shit.
cameron20101000 3 months ago
@cameron20101000 actually when duke nukem 3d 1st came it did used the DOOM engine
N64 version tried something alittle different
and i think duke nukem forever used the DOOM 3 engine...IDK
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 n64 uses quake or doom 64 engine
and you right about other ports of this game!
cameron20101000 2 months ago
@cameron20101000 no the N64 version did not use quake if it did it would have a tilted screen when you strafe + everything would be 3D graphic
doom 64 engine was just a remodified doom engine from the original doom
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 well, alright
Saturn version is made out of crap like saturn doom and gba doom
really? a sega genesis duke nukem?
cameron20101000 2 months ago
@cameron20101000
doom on saturn was crap
doom on GBA was good its just not the best besides its the only way to play doom on the go
duke nukem on sega genesis was a new thing for sega genesis but it isnt rly that good
not all of playstation FPS game are better than sega saturn FPS games
hexen on sega saturn was slightly better than the PSX version and
quake on saturn turned PERFECT comparing to the PC version the only difference is some new textures and completely different secret levels
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 Quake on saturn uses the pc textures
Doom on saturn was made of shit
i will look up hexen on ps1
Doom 2 on gba was a shitty port, monsters were horrible and everyone's using green instead red
especially the damn Archviles, maybe they cannot resurrect monsters in this version
because dead people don't stay too long
so don't play doom 2 on gba unless youi want to throw up from the fucking blood.
cameron20101000 2 months ago
@cameron20101000 actually DOOM 2 on GBA was even better than doom 1 GBA
the monster dont rly have a problem (except the mancubus which it has inaccurate shooting)
censorship doesnt change gameplay its still doom
archviles are always a pain in the ass even the PC version
so i dont see why you think its that bad i play the port all the time
infact...LOTS OF PPL liked the port
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 Mancubus attack was horrible
i just like the pc port better than the gba port
all because of this
Those muthafuckas gave it an T rating because of thr graphics and the half-violence.
all archviles is fire up your ass, resurrect people and that's it.
i still like him though.
cameron20101000 2 months ago
@cameron20101000 reason why it was rated T cuz it was censor BUT like i said censorship does not change gameplay
if you look at WOLF3D on snes it may have bad graphics but it has very fluent control and smooth gameplay which i kinda like better than WOLF3D on jaguar
and not to mention its not the graphics that make the games good
its ALL ABOUT GAMEPLAY
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 wolf3d on super nes i saw it and watch it.
no blood which is funny
cameron20101000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 Still, graphics can have some importance to the game. If they get TOO bad, then there's no way to tell what the hell is going on. Think of what Wolfenstein 3D would look like on the regular NES (not the SNES), and picture you moving farther and farther away from an enemy as he gets more and more pixely. You couldn't tell him apart from the background because the graphics are way too bad. That's an example of how graphics could matter in some cases.
SonicTehAwesomeFace 2 months ago
@SonicTehAwesomeFace i did got wolfenstein on a ZX spectrum emulator (yes ppl still make games on zx spectrum)
its pretty fast paced but its playable
i mean look at minecraft
that game doesnt have today's graphics and look how popular that game is
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 Actually, you can make the graphics better through texture packs. Regardless, graphics only matter if you can't see what you're doing. Imagine a screen that's only 3 by three pixels. That may be fine for a tic tac toe game, but if you wanted to play a first person shooter in that resolution, how are you going to know what you're doing? You wouldn't be able to see sh*t. Like I said: That's the ONLY time that graphics matter.
SonicTehAwesomeFace 2 months ago
@SonicTehAwesomeFace that did not have to do anything with graphics thats the of resolution
BUT
resolution can be useful for increasing the FPS
if you look at doom on snes they manage to make it playable by lowering the graphics and screen resolution
which it i managed to get better frame rate than the 3DO and sega saturn port
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@killkenny5000 I've played the Saturn port. The frame rate freaking sucks. I have no idea why, because the saturn is much more powerful than the SNES, and yet it's still a very laggy frame rate. And Doom is a 2D game made to look 3D. The Saturn should've been GREAT for it because it was meant for 2D games more than it was meant for 3D games. But no. Somehow, no.
SonicTehAwesomeFace 2 months ago
@SonicTehAwesomeFace well actually doom had a 3D background while the rest is 2D
but for no reason the saturn had a perfect version of quake
it has all the levels and everything the only difference is
new textures and architecture
and completely different secret levels
killkenny5000 2 months ago
Saturn version actually uses a full 3D-engine (Slavedriver), so you can freely look around, unlike PSX and N64. Which is probably why it's a bit slower and controls are a bit awkward. They apparently went with as Saturn does go well with the "2.5D engine" that Duke3D and Doom uses as demonstrated with the Doom port of Saturn.
cakestalker 3 months ago
@cakestalker its not completely 3D cuz of the 2d sprites + you can do also free look on N64 and PSX and PC
1st completely 3D FPS game that i know was QUAKE
killkenny5000 2 months ago
I just wanted to ask. why did they make a Duke Nukem without any nude women. I'm not saying that they should be everywhere in the game but that picture on the wall at 0:34, (on the Duke Nukem i hav on the PC) she is butt naked and on the projector in the movie theater, she is naked too. so why did they changed? I played Duke Nukem on xbox, the psp port of Duke Nukem and another Duke Nukem version on PC and most women were clothed. so I ask, Why did they change it?
ben0425 4 months ago
I just wanted to ask. why did they make a Duke Nukem without any nude women. I'm not saying that they should be everywhere in the game but that picture on the wall at 0:34, (on the Duke Nukem i hav on the PC) she is butt naked and on the projector in the movie theater, she is naked too. so why did they changed? I played Duke Nukem on xbox, the psp port of Duke Nukem and another Duke Nukem version on PC and most women were clothed. so I ask, Why did they change it?
ben0425 4 months ago
I think that the genesis one is far more superior. I recently did a review with a friend of mine where we discussed a lot of the deeper meanings and poetic metaphors behind the game. A lot of people don't realize what Duke Nukem stands for, what with the remake that came out a few months ago for the PS3 and Gamecube, a lot of people are thinking it's about manliness and being a boy. But it's not. It's more than that.
pizzapits 4 months ago
lol! i think the original PC Version wins ! xD
the psx, saturn an others are all extra copys :P
noromeo4ever 5 months ago
@noromeo4ever well the PSX version has a new episode for longer lasting game play
killkenny5000 4 months ago
sgea saturn!!!
nikosorange1997 5 months ago
It seems the PSX version has higher quality versions of the original Duke Talk samples from the PC. Nifty! Ripping those would be helpful in making a high quality sound pack or something.
Bashe86 5 months ago
Yah.... I can't decide. Saturn looks fucking awesome. PSX is much more true to PC....
If I save up my money... Should I get a PS2 or just play GC games on my Wii? Because I hear PS2 can backwards emulate.
Masterlink981 5 months ago
@Masterlink981 PSX is most accurate to PC
saturn has missing levels and bad control so get it on PSX
killkenny5000 4 months ago 6
@killkenny5000 K, Thankz.
Masterlink981 4 months ago
@killkenny5000 or XBLA
tnarockshard 3 weeks ago
@killkenny5000 ball shit its the mega drive version
LOL
theretrogamerno1 14 hours ago
@theretrogamerno1 having a first person shooter on sega genesis or mega drive is a pretty cool way to do on genesis but the i cant believe how bad a first person shooter can actually get screwed up it wasnt that choppy but the difficulty and did not used the doom engine instead used the wolfenstein engine
killkenny5000 13 hours ago
@killkenny5000 it shouldn't have used the W3d engine
theretrogamerno1 1 hour ago
"Auto Destruct" Hmm...we must find the nuke button in Hollywood! XD
SAFORecruitment01 6 months ago
Saturn is better, but the PSX is more accurate to the PC.
SAFORecruitment01 6 months ago
saturn is very underrated. I own one and i am really happy with the quality.... is probably because it has 2 cpus so is harder for dev to optimize the game to fully utilize saturn
chantimothy 6 months ago
*Cough*Originally for the Pc then ported *cough*
cheezandtoast 6 months ago
The PS1 version was kinda shitty and slow compared to the PC- version, but still playable. I've got the Saturn version too among a couple of other games , never played it though, haven't found cheap enough Saturn yet lol.
tk80 6 months ago
@tk80 the flaws from saturn is bad control and missing levels
killkenny5000 6 months ago
I've always heard that the Saturn port was worst in every detail.The Saturn had better 2D hardware than the PSX, but 3D...sorry, but no.I've played them both, and even though I don't think the Saturn's port is not awful like everyone I've heard talking about it, the PSX takes the entire cake in this department.In my infancy I've had SEGA, in my chilhood/teen years I've had SONY...and even though I love them both(and NES/SNES/PC too), I think the PSX is the best console ever.It's just my opinion.
rsdestroy 7 months ago
oh if only the saturn had better controllers..... D:
zyriuz2 7 months ago
Dude i hate the Saturn version
It makes me sick, duke moves like hes drunk
DutchDukeMan 7 months ago
@DutchDukeMan it the same movement from quake
killkenny5000 6 months ago
Okay guys, if the Saturn version is so much better, where did half of the textures go? Half of the level architecture? Half of the Duke Talk?
Anybody who sees the Saturn port and thinks its better is sorely mistaken.
Saxonation 7 months ago 2
Saturn wins but the port is still dog shit, just play it on xbox live best port.
steve5123456789 7 months ago
@steve5123456789 no saturn fails for lack of some levels and control
PSX is best
killkenny5000 6 months ago
This debate has raged since both versions came out.
I like the sat version over ps1 but it IS barebones, the upside is that there is a hidden version of Deathtank in it , and "Jevon's controls" make is playable though both sadly are VERY limited.
Thankfully there is a remake on pc that is the best of both worlds and then some with 3d models and lighting taken form the "polymost" engine.
That and there will be ANOTHER remake using DNF's UT3 engine(waiting for it.)
reignick1133 7 months ago
Oh yeah... there was a Sega Saturn. I forgot all about that.
TadRaunch 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
For once the Saturn won something IMO. Labotamy was a cool company that supported the Saturn and did the best console port of the game IMO
Saturn version had the lighting, graphics and frame rate. It also had 2 player netlink online play (see my videos for a demonstration of it)
xDerekRx 7 months ago
Yes, but graphics and framerate aren't everything. The Saturn is missing levels, has simplified levels almost no scripting, no rotating or moving sectors, worse controls, and is slower.
elbryan42 7 months ago
@elbryan42 But then... which is better Rob? PSX? or The Saturn? Because when I get a PS2 I might get Duke Nukem Total Meltdown. I wonder what the PSX is like... The PSX has very good graphics and fast paced music. That's my opinion.
Masterlink981 5 months ago
@elbryan42 Now that I think about it... I like the PSX version a lot more. It's faster, and the music is better paced. Better graphics. Better everything.
Masterlink981 5 months ago
@elbryan42 So the PSX version wins? Also, I have a question. 'Bout the PSX version. I heard that if you play it on a PS2 the textures and sprites get smoother. I read it on an Amazon review... Unless I must be hearing things....
Masterlink981 5 months ago
@elbryan42 yep, i had a lot of fun with the saturn version, though people trash it cuz of pc.......but at that time console owners knew they werent getting pc quality. hell, my dad finally bought a decent pc for over 2000 dollars!!!
crazyirish77 3 months ago
@crazyirish77 lucky i have a crappy PC over 2000$ :(
for 1.crappy video card
2.windows vista
killkenny5000 2 months ago
i think if you put saturn lighting n framerate onto the ps1 then you've got yourself a good game
cherrypie341 7 months ago
This game is awesome on the Saturn, despite a few ommisions. I'm just happy they supported the console when other developers wouldn't.
Monacomaverick 7 months ago
You know, for as much as I cut down the Saturn version, I really do appreciate the support Lobotomy gave to the Saturn. Too bad barely any other companies supported it in North America. The system wasn't perfect, but it should've done better than it did.
elbryan42 7 months ago
@elbryan42
frankly I think most critics and sadly , gamers, don't give the Saturn enough credit in the capability department (they like to claim its vastly weaker than the PS)
anyways, I like all 3 console versions , each one has something the other lacks, wheter in the technical department or content.
and I actually find the controls are fine on the Saturn , though I agree the simplication is a bit of a negative (same goes for the censorship on the N64)
lightdark28 7 months ago
@elbryan42 i hate to say it, but conseptualy the saturn was a great system, and was realistically the only system some arcade ports could play on due to better 2d support. but saturn was such a nightmare to program for... correct me if im wrong but it had 2 processors in a time when no one had two processors, and on top of that, they were two different processors.
i loke many of its games, but the system was such a mess.
alidan 6 months ago
Oh, I love the system. The 2D capabilities were outstanding. Sega did right with the Saturn and the Dreamcast, since they modeled the systems off of their arcade hardware at the time. Unfortunately, the Saturn wasn't made for 3D. Which is why it's outstanding that Lobotomy did such an outstanding job getting 3D to run so well.
elbryan42 6 months ago
The problem is, the problems with Saturn Duke are mainly design decisions. Some of it is surely due to the limitations of the Slavedriver engine (like rotating sectors, horizontalally moving sectors and such). But many of the problems like a lower field of vision, the slower speed, the missing levels, the overall lack of scripting, the too basic controls (with autoducking, yuck), all were obvious design choices that could've been avoided. They changed the core game of Duke3D for whatever reason.
elbryan42 6 months ago
Commendable, yes, that they did it. But they could've done so much better. Quake on the Saturn was SO much better. Obviously the Saturn and the Slavedriver engine was capable of so much more than what they offered in Saturn Duke3D.
elbryan42 6 months ago
@Monacomaverick They shouldn't have rushed the saturn enyway
theretrogamerno1 6 months ago
Holy shit..
I clicked on this thinking Playstation would win, but shit.
Saturn destroyed it with better sound, graphics, framerate, and so on.
bleedingxxaurora 8 months ago
Saturn In reality the Saturn is much worse. The graphics and framerate are the only thing that's better. The architecture in the levels is simplified, there are levels cut out, as well as parts of levels. The controls are much worse than the PSX, the game runs at about 80% of the speed of other ports. The PSX has much more, varied music. The Saturn has less interactivity, no rotating sectors, no subways or transports, and very little scripting.
The Saturn port is beautiful, but it's bare bones.
elbryan42 8 months ago 11
@elbryan42 Is it me or the PSX port looks like it has more detail and brighter colours, and it also has much clearer sound too. The N64 version looks smoother with better effects but the game looks a little more bland, typical with all N64 games. The Saturn port looks inferior in my opinion, its darker and paler, it runs smoother but the awful controls destroys that playability. The Saturn is bare bones in gameplay and bare bones in graphics too.
SNESFanboy64 3 months ago
@elbryan42
It does have that exclusive bonus level "Urea 51", though it's not much, and it's kinda cool it has a real 3D-engine, even though the controls are a bit odd, but at least I got used to it.
cakestalker 3 months ago
@elbryan42 The Saturn port is pretty lacking but the worst port of all time is the Sega Genesis version. It's Godawful, I heard that you can't even turn while moving.
SNESFanboy64 3 months ago
Being on the Genesis, and made as a cash in for Brazil (which is one of many cheap releases there for the Genesis and Master System). Yes, you can turn in it. And it would be great as an FPS on the Genesis (considering what the Genesis is capable of). Except, the challenge is maddening. The enemies hit you for a lot of health, and they're too damn accurate. Honestly, if they fixed the difficulty, it would stand alongside Zero Tolerance as a great Genesis shooter.
elbryan42 3 months ago
@SNESFanboy64 thats because the genesis doesnt even have shoulder buttons so you have to hold down a button in order to strafe
half the FPS games on genesis or jaguar have to do that :l
+ its hard to put a FPS game on a 16-bit system so they tried
so far the most amazing FPS game on genesis will be the BLOODSHOT
so it had a chance :L
killkenny5000 2 months ago
@elbryan42
Of course overall porting games that were originally built for PCs into consoles often fail and these are just examples.
zonilo1 1 month ago
Honestly I like original much better. Because is original is better, not that cheap like PSX with some stupid beat addons.
MaxRideWizardLord 8 months ago
Saturn has better framate and music, but the PSP has better controls and better gameplay in the aspect in which the character moves
EdgarIX 8 months ago
Very funny at what he said at 3:40 xD
theseus27 8 months ago
Why did I trade my Duke Nukem 3D PSX game I will never know??
I want it back, right now!!! :(
Lol
theseus27 8 months ago
Steoroids? Duke nukem doesnt need steoroids.
TehParadocks 8 months ago
PSX vs Saturn? How about PC.
PlaystFreak 8 months ago
PSX version wins, but i have to say, the lightning effects are pretty awesome in the saturn version, besides that, it sucks.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
PSX version wins
themaniacboy 8 months ago
the textures are horribly aligned in the saturn version. and wtf is up with the cam tilting when duke is turning? And judging by the general feel, I'd not be surprised if someone told me they had used an other game engine on the saturn.
NrKoo 8 months ago
It's really slow, are you playing on a PAL Sega? That could explain, if not they really %$"/$ up!
dupdupdupdup 9 months ago
I'm playing on a normal North American NTSC Saturn. That's the real speed. The speed on the Saturn port is one of my main gripes I have with it.
elbryan42 9 months ago
Comment removed
dupdupdupdup 9 months ago
for me the better port would have to be the n64
it had some more challenge to it and a bit more to offer
and also being raised with an n64 :P
joshtheoriginal10 9 months ago
Agreed. The few things that I didn't like was the lack of music and lack of parallaxed skies. Also, I couldn't get used to the constant lookspring. But overall, it was a great product with plenty of new content not in any other Duke Nukem game. Plus 4 player split screen was amazing!
How Goldeneye and Perfect Dark stayed as popular as they did when there was Duke Nukem 64 (and Hexen 64) is completely beyond me.
elbryan42 9 months ago
The Playstation version is the more complete game. The Saturn port is quite acomplished for sprite biased machine....Lobotomy knew how to get the best out of Sega's underdog hardware. But when it comes to DN3D the PS port wins hands down.
JohnJamesMaloney 9 months ago
@JohnJamesMaloney
You guys are jokers...
How can you deny what you're seeing here?
Saturn version looks like a PS2 game but with better framerate.
PersonaBrazil 9 months ago 4
Yes, but the Saturn version is missing levels, is missing almost all of the scripting, has simplified environments, less interactivity, and runs at roughly 80% of the speed of all other Duke 3D games. Graphics aren't everything.
elbryan42 9 months ago
@elbryan42
Oh, i didn't know this, my bad.
And you're right about the graphics.
PersonaBrazil 9 months ago
@elbryan42 But the saturn version has online play. No joke, search Saturn Netlink.
HaloSpartanG13 9 months ago
@HaloSpartanG13 Wow did not know that one.....fair fkin' play!
JohnJamesMaloney 8 months ago
@elbryan42
Simplified environments? And i take it the PSX version has everything like the pc version right? The Saturn isnt missing levels. The PSX version has an extra Episode which is not present in the pc version, plus one extra level. I own the PSX version of Duke btw, and i would love it for you to explain to me where the PSX version is more interactive. And i thought the percentage was a nice touch, im pretty sure that number is accurate. Graphics arent everything, i agree...
fiaisguy 9 months ago
The PSX version has everything from the first three episodes on the PC. There's very few cases where there's a window missing or a missing mirror, but architecture is almost the exact same, with all secret areas.
The Saturn version is missing the levels Spin Cycle, Lunatic Fringe, Tier Drops and Freeway. Not to mention half of Hotel Hell is gone.
The Saturn version has less Duke sayings, less light switches, no going to the bathroom, missing secret areas, and almost no scripting.
elbryan42 9 months ago
@fiaisguy The psx version is the best out of all ports, if you could name one port that is better then the psx version.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
@themaniacboy
I will name you a better version than the PSX, the Saturn one. Quite simply i own BOTH games, i finished them on both machines, and when it comes to fun, frame rate, textures you name it, the Saturn version blows teh PSX out of the water. The only differences are some moving objects that dont move on the Saturn version, like on Death row level, but besides that, Saturn wons hands down. I will sell you my PSX copy of duke if you liek it so much.
fiaisguy 8 months ago
@fiaisguy I already got the PSX version, also owned the Saturn version.
The PSX version is more faithful to the PC version, it's faster than the saturn version, has better sounds and the graphics may not be par with the saturn version, but the saturn has some cut parts.
In short, it's a butchered port.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
@themaniacboy
Better sounds? For someone that owns or owned both versions, i disagree, but sure i can go with the PSX having better sound. More faithfull to the pc, not really, there are differences in the levels like there are on the Saturn due to limitations. The PSX has an extra episode not present on the pc version and therefore not on the Saturn, however Saturn has one exclusive secret level. You have to joking about the Saturn being a butchered port. That is just ridiculous.
fiaisguy 8 months ago
@fiaisguy I did mention the lightning effects of the saturn, but there are some parts where i would think, how is that possible ?
Some places were supposed to be dark, but they weren't.
The PSX version has some framerate issues, but it doesn't feel slow like the Saturn version, the saturn also has some strange textures, really strange, it seems like Duke is small.
I surely did play the Saturn version, the music was awesome, very faithfull to the original.
But that doesn't the PSX's gameplay.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
@themaniacboy
Agreed with some rough textures, same on some parts on the PSX.
Dont get me worng, the PSX version is in my opinion inferior, but it is not a bad game. I had fun with it. BUt the Saturn version is better, and it is a technical feat as well. The game is balanced and fun and with the 3d control pad its a blast to control.
It comes down to what you like the most. Some technical achievements are hard to ignore, but other than that they are both two good games.
fiaisguy 8 months ago
@fiaisguy I'll play the Saturn version again in a minute, just to refresh my memory.
I can't base it on a video, but i'll reply when i played the saturn version.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
@elbryan42
... But constant frame rate is. And the Saturn blows the PSX version out of the water. The game is smoother, faster and really fun to play. I have both versions and i had fun with the PSX version, but the extra episode is garbage, and the game has to many shortcomings. I have been seeing a lot of your videos, but i really should stop. For someone who isnt biased, you sure fool me.
fiaisguy 9 months ago
I keep meaning to make a real comparison video for the Saturn vs PSX. The levels are very simplified on the Saturn. The Saturn does run slower, but smoother. Everything, even the enemies falling is slower, as if the game clock is running at about 80% of the speed. I'm completely objective, and the PSX version does have some flaws like framerate and choppy framerate. But the Saturn has nothing special about it. It's a bare bones FPS game with a Duke Nukem 3D skin.
elbryan42 9 months ago
The Saturn port has almost no scripting, no moving sectors (subways, transports), no rotating sectors, and is pretty lifeless. Duke to me isn't about the naughtiness or gore, to me it's great ideas, inventiveness, and a game environment that really jumps out at you.
Like I said, besides shooting, there's not much to see in Saturn Duke. I can make videos to prove my point.
elbryan42 9 months ago
About the extra PSX ep, your opinion. I respect it, even if I don't agree with it. It's new content.
The Saturn had Death Tank and Urea 51 as new content. The PSX version has 5 new levels, new enemies and new graphics. The N64 version has new weapons and ammo, extra content from The Birth episode, new parts of levels in episodes 1 and 3 and new graphics and references. On top of that, the Saturn is missing the most of the original content. The N64 replaced content, the Saturn just cut it out.
elbryan42 9 months ago
@elbryan42 IMO the PSX version is the best port.
It has awesome music, great soundeffects and pretty awful controls in the beginning, but after 1 level, you are used to them.
I bought it a few days ago for my PS3 and it's awesome.
Totally worth the money, but it's very rare.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
Your are a total retard.
TheDukeljk 8 months ago
@fiaisguy The psx version sucks ass, it is so fucking boring and slow.
It doesn't feel alive, the psx version does.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
I mean the Saturn version sucks ass.
themaniacboy 8 months ago
@themaniacboy
And in what way is the PSX version faster? If you are talking about framerate the Saturn runs at a clear higher speed, being the fastest of the two. The video right here proves it, and there is no slow down, unlike the PSX port. Did i mention the Lighting effects the Saturn has and the PSX doesnt? The only thing i find clearly better on the PSX is some sounds, namely Duke´s one liners... And thats about it.
fiaisguy 8 months ago
@PersonaBrazil Have you actual played the PS1 version, you'd be suprised how good it is. The PC original is always going to be the no 1 choice but the Playstation one is a brilliant port. I use to have the Saturn version and I've got to say Lobotomy did an amazing job (they had to rewrite the game code) as they did with Quake (stunning, better than the N64 one) and Exhumed (Powerslave), but the PS1 version of DN still gets my vote.
JohnJamesMaloney 8 months ago
@PersonaBrazil that maybe so but the controls are god awful and cut off levels it seem the PSX always beats saturn ports
killkenny5000 7 months ago
i just realize that the saturn port has quake movement
killkenny5000 7 months ago
The Saturn version looked smoother and less pixelated but had less detail in some of the textures. The draw distance was shorter than the PS1 versions also.. plus it had that weird camera tilt effect when you walked around.
Ostnizdasht206 9 months ago
Maybe just me but I think the Saturn version looks better...
euvi85 9 months ago
Looks aren't everything...
elbryan42 9 months ago
@elbryan42 its the same game so it is everything
PSPHaCkHeLp2011 9 months ago
Actually, not it isn't. Duke Nukem 3D for the Saturn is missing tons of stuff. Most of the scripting is gone, most of Duke's sayings are gone, most interactivity is gone, a bunch of levels are missing, the gameplay's much slower, the controls are seriously crippled, the levels are drastically simplified, most of the music is gone, and such.
Duke Nukem 3D for the Saturn is a very sad excuse for a port. The graphics are the ONLY thing that's better compared to the PSX and N64 ports.
elbryan42 9 months ago
@elbryan42 thanks for letting me know. i will sub, please sub back.
PSPHaCkHeLp2011 9 months ago
the saturn version isnt piece of cake IS PIECE OF SHIT compared with the PSX version
kaiokendo 10 months ago
lol it seems like everyone takes the same path in the first level, drop down, get the bazooka, jump into the invisible wall, jump out the other side and kill the monster near the flaming dumpster, then blow open the wall with the bazooka
arcticridge 10 months ago
The PS1 music...it's....
it's glorious...
ViceCityCitizen 10 months ago
You forget about the Saturn version's strange camera sway when you turn after not too long. Crazy how it seems tp have full lighting everywhere, I can't believe it's realtime but maybe it is. Makes the game seem grittier and grimier, which suits it very well.
retread01 11 months ago
@retread01 The Saturn version runs on the same version of the engine from Powerslave/Exhumed, I think.
M0RGANMAN 11 months ago
cool i actually forgot duke nukem was on the playstation
djklink20009 11 months ago
Comment removed
dinizgames 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Duke Nukem 3D on PC = The original and funnier version,
Duke Nukem on the Sega Saturn = Most serious version of the sondtrack's which gives you a felling of immersion onto the game,
Duke Nukem 3D on the ps1 = The adrenaline rush version, fast and kick as remixs,
Duke Nukem 3D on the N64 = The version which changed the most, interesting to discover, you'll fell like playing duke 3D all over again with all the differences, unfortunately censored...
You cant possibly go wrong wit any of them!
dinizgames 11 months ago
Duke Nukem 3D on PC = The original and funnier version,
Duke Nukem 3D on the ps1 = The adrenaline rush version, fast and kick as remixs,
Duke Nukem on the Sega Saturn = Most serious version of the sondtrack's which gives you a felling of immersion onto the game,
Duke Nukem 3D on the N64 = The version which changed the most, interesting to discover, you'll fell like playing duke 3D all over again with all the differences, unfortunately censored...
You cant possibly go wrong wit any of them!
dinizgames 11 months ago 3
@dinizgames The console versions have higher sampled audio, unlike the .VOCs for PC.
SlimeTron5000 11 months ago
The N64 port was pretty good.
Iamnotimaginative 11 months ago
The Saturn has some interesting features, but in many ways it bites the dust compared to the PSX version. The animation of dying enemies is speed up, the pistol shoots slower, much of the original art is NOT included, levels being split up in 2 parts, the PSX version has also much better controls.
nl3paul3nl 11 months ago
The Saturn version seems to have lightning effects, and better animation, but the PSX seems sharper.
leydeplomo 11 months ago
Saturn version had online!
No kidding!
GAMERSHARK100 11 months ago
I'm digging the remixed music.
Touhou1990 1 year ago
Duke Nukem on PS1 was awesome!
SIRxxxTMG 1 year ago
quite similar to pc version. I wonder why there was nothing like Quake for psx, until quake come on PC and suddenly psx become able to cope with quake II.
schizoafekt 1 year ago
"I'm gonna rip off your head, and shit down your neck"
"Balls of steel!"
--Duke Nukem at it's finest*
slapshot4151 1 year ago
rofl the sarurn graphics remind me the "jaguar" console and also its so funny to wtch ppl say that the saturn version was better when the prodicers of the game admit they couldnt do nothing more to help saturn ...
thats what i call BLINDFOLDED
gloup81 1 year ago
psx gains points for beeing true to the pc vaesion, but the saturn also have points for having light effects :P
zyriuz2 1 year ago
Duke is great no matter the way you play it
TrupiKing 1 year ago
Wow. Duke's Desert Eagle is one strong pistol. :)
MetalDragonX694 1 year ago
@MetalDragonX694 Duke doesn't have a Deagle until after Duke 3d. The hand gun in Duke Nukem appears to be modified Glock 17
BombadierYossarian22 1 year ago
Saturn version was better imo. BTW you cant play duke for shit!
segazip 1 year ago
owned both versions & there was NO CONTEST,the saturn version bent the PS version over & f***ed it raw!The saturn was ALOT smoother & faster,I gave my PS copy away after I got the saturn version.I played the N64 version & that was just as bad as the PS version but made even worse by being censored!
socillizt4life 1 year ago
@socillizt4life f***ed it raw?
Never have used that quote while judging a video game.. other things, though never a game.
bigt1nyhatch 1 year ago
i wonder what happend to my copy? heh heh. but i do have it for the PC also, i'd have to say, the psx port is far more better than the sega, but that's just my opinion, i think the best ports of the game are PSX Duke and N64 Duke, even though it's censored, it's still good, even has references not in the pc version such as lo wang! good video, keep it up!
MrGerolf 1 year ago
sega saturn is better
segafan1111 1 year ago
Damn, those aliens bastard are going to pay for shooting at my ride...
Berni0707 1 year ago
1 - N64 Version
2 - Saturn Version
3 - PC Version
4 - PSX Version
domymbd 1 year ago
@domymbd
Why?
IdentityUnknownYet 1 year ago
@IdentityUnknownYet 1 thing: the split screen coop. word.
domymbd 10 months ago
@domymbd whatttttt?????? if the N64 version have not effects, is censored, the steroids are vitamin, the nude girls are a stupid announcement, ths dark light didnt exist... the N64 is teh worst...
1. PC version
2. PSX version
3. Saturn version (maybe 3 and 4 must have same place, saving teh differences)
4. N64 version... (because transform the origianl game in a kids game)
frajaos 1 year ago
@domymbd Lol you pussy, you actually play nintendo shit?? Fucking flaming homo, man damn you fucking sack.
OrgasmicPancakes 1 year ago
i love the PSX Version the Music rules, this game is great
Natureworld1986 1 year ago
This looks terrible. The PC Version is what made this game popular as with most any shooter, it's just console fanboys are pretty clueless as to how and why these games even exist.
soundtheology 1 year ago
LOBOTOMY where genius' with the saturn hardeware. one of those few developers able to get around its complex architecture.
wondereyedrive 1 year ago
On the saturn it looks like Duke had some beers behind his teeth
Cqub3 1 year ago
i got the ps1 version it lags in some areas but it still a great fps game for the ps1 2nd behind doom
purplespyro2k9 1 year ago
Holy shit. The Saturn version is fucking awesome. Better then the N64 even. That's nuts. Damn I wanna get this now, lol.
apocalypse1280 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Interesting what they did to the music. "Duke Nukem 3D: Gay Nightclub Remix Version".
lyris1 1 year ago
@lyris1
How sad that people really have a thing with associating electronic/techno music with homosexuality. Not cool at all.
Frostbite249 1 year ago
I used to play both versions back in the day, The saturn version played much better the controls the framerate were better and all the hidden stuff to added a lot
Grumphuttock 1 year ago
I got to day, the saturn version seems to run better. The frame rate seems higher, and there is some "float" when he changes direction.
oneuptheextraman 1 year ago
@oneuptheextraman
It's actually running on a different engine, the same one used for Exhumed. It's proof positive that the Saturn CAN do good 3D if you rub it the right way.
akumacornflakes 1 year ago
Great video Elbryan42. ^^
I like the Dynamic lighting in the Saturn version, but it is missing things like swinging doors. >_> Curious though is that the movie posters are different inside the movie theatre in the PSX version, similarly to the N64 version.
For the this era ports, I like the N64 version because it's more original. If I had to pick between the two though I'd pick the PSX version due to the additional episode. Urea51 on the Saturn was a lame level. Sorry Lobotomy. :P
JinrohDev 1 year ago
got both, saturn wins
azb0111 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this game was pure fun !
cyberdejin 1 year ago
I honestly didn't expect the Saturn versino to look better, but the Playstation version definitely wins in the sound department. From what I read, true 3d games on Saturn weren't easy to come by. I'm guessing that's partly due to the Saturn being difficult to program for? In the Saturn version, the camera seems more dynamic whereas the Playstation version was more stationary. However from the looks of things, this seems to be a hindrance to gameplay. Besides, we all know who won the 32-bit wars.
knuxthefox 1 year ago
best game every better then doom the need to remake it on xbox 360
MYDRAGGIN84 1 year ago
@MYDRAGGIN84 its on the 360
morpheus2n 1 year ago
@morpheus2n the 360 version is shit
chrislovespillz 1 year ago
@chrislovespillz I didn't find it that bad but yeah compared to the origanel PC version its lacking lol :)
morpheus2n 1 year ago
what is this you cant look up in either
TheNboy121 1 year ago
You can look up and down in both. But there's autoaim, so there's really no point in wasting your time.
elbryan42 1 year ago
@elbryan42 am I dreaming or the Saturn version has much better framerate