bought one of these was very good for a few months but the anti dust system is rubbish i put compressed gas in it, cleaned the mirror, cleaned the lenses and still have vast amounts of dust when i do a HDR
Its a solid camera, the quality is far supirior to the newer Sony Nex 3 and 5, the live view is great, the screen is nice a solid, no video, you buy a slr for photos not videos, all in all great camera and lens
I got my hands on one today and I have to agree with a lot of people who said it does not feel plastic.I think the new design is refreshing as it has a bit more curves and feels less bulky. you did not really talk about live view performance or the cost and that its user interface is more friendly than other cameras.(something to include in the future)
This camera is well built, feels great, works flawlessly once u get to know it's perks amazing pics quality can be obtained. The left slide port access slot is pure genius. My only complain is the right lobe/grip doesn't fit in big hands . But that can easily be fixed by buying the 40$ STPHS1AMW Hand Strap for a™ (alpha) Digital SLR Cameras the hand strap is the most comfortable accessory a MUST buy make a huge difference.
If we talk DSLR's it's worth it because it's not very bulky, at least not the body, but with lens changing it was at times bothering... but my second DSLR was broken and at home. So if you are interested in photography it's worth it. Otherwise there is some good compacts too, but ISO noise is their biggest problem.
Choose which feels better in your hands. But in my opinion Nikon is better because you have a wider selection of lenses and 3rd party accessories. Also d3000 has faster continuous shooting and better for a beginner.
sony and nikon use the same sensors, however the firmware is very much so different. thus, the d3x with good high iso and the same sensor a850/900 with terrible high iso.
yes the d3x has very good high iso performance and the a850/a900 are not that good.. but that doesnt mean that a900/a850 sucks in high ISO perofrmance. and the recent a5x0 has improved their ISO performance. hope that sony could put their exmor R sensor into the dslrs. and noise problems would be solved.
hows that 200 goin for you? i have this camera and was lookin for a telephoto lens, i wasnt sure to go for the 200 or the 300 any advice since you own the a330?
200 is really great. very reliable and the perfect amount of zoom i need. i guess a 300 would be better but i couldn't find a reason why i would need that much.
Im very intresteted in photography alwayshave been im looking for a good camrea im not to crazyabout the 1000 $ range Ha! But im in the 100 to maxium 600$ Any tips PLEASE !! i REALLY NEEDhelp Thanks!! Photomad97-
Its a good camera, the design and small grip is not that big deal when you see it in real life, also makes it very compact and nice when carrying 2 dslr's. IQ is great... it obviously allways depends on the lens, but the new kit-lens is quite good!. ISO 100-1600 is ok. Sony's Live view is as expected the best you'll see around.
Out of the 12 reviews I have read for this camera, this is the second least useful. And the ONLY one that doesn't like the new body design. You show the box contents, which is unique, but the picture quality isn't talked about at all.
And you discount it because it doesn't have video mode? If I wanted a video camera, I wouldn't get a DSLR. Instead I'd keep my DSC point and shoot or, *gasp*, a video camera. I don't usually leave comments like this, but this review is too biased to be credible.
If you want to see images taken with this exact camera go to my picasa page. Sorry but Youtube does not allow any comments resembling a link so I will just say go to Picasa dot-com and search for images tagged nosajck. If they are listed as taken by Blackriver 69 those are my images and all taken with the Sony a330.
The lens used were the 18-55 that came with the body as well as the Minolta AF 75-300 F4.5-5.6 2561-100 (1986 version). The images were taken in fine quality jpeg mode.
good thing he doesn't discuss image quality WHATSOEVER in this review. but then again, IQ is certainly the least important factor when comparing cameras, amirite?
am just starting to explore its many functions and other feature....... could this be gud for extra ordinary picture taking....without editng in photoshop programs?
I just bought this camera about a week back and so far it takes fantastic pictures...the image quality is superb and it's easier to carry and hold...so far i didnt see any problem with this camera...it's definitely a value for money buy!
I am really dissapointed with sony's new dslrs, they have deviated from the things that are important for an slr. I know they are trying to make slrs more apealing to beginners but that is not who an slr is for. live view is pointless, the hand grip is too small and the buttons and dials have been compromised, the thumb rest on the back is to close to the buttons. I want simpler cameras without all the auto settings, affordable full size sensors and it shuld be sized for human hands.
The comment was made in comparison with the Sony A300/A350 which is much more robust. The A330 and the A380 are definitely more plastic then previous models which we believe is a great shame. The sliding door will trap dirt and make cleaning a nightmare - this makes it almost as bad as no protection.
on top of that, most of the DSLR's with video modes dont have autofocus in video, so that has no reason why sony didn't decide to put video mode into it, I wish they had, but that is no excuse for that
You are right that it has nothing to do with autofocus... our point was related to the method which Sony delivers Live View which would cause a problem as the Live View sensor is different from the image sensor. No other DSLRs in the market will have that problem. The difference exist because of different ways of focusing in Live View which Sony is in fact better.
@dereileak being the cheapest dslr out there,, it won't have everything...but it really is a great camera for those starting up,,,alot of people are holding back on dslr because of its high price and confusing menu... i just bought one off craiglist for 200 and it feels great and im enjoying it so far....
This camera is well built, feels great, works flawlessly once u get to know it's perks ...amazing pics quality can be obtained. The left slide port access slot is pure genius. My only complain is the right lobe/grip doesn't fit in big hands . But that can easily be fixed by buying the 40$ STPHS1AMW Hand Strap for a™ (alpha) Digital SLR Cameras. The hand strap is the most comfortable accessory a MUST buy make a huge difference.
I dont see how you will get more dirt in the door, unless you roll your camera in dirt and spit on it, it wont be a nightmare, your simply overreacting
It is good the the new Sony A330 camera came out. Having new features and look. But It does look like the old Minolta Dynax 5 but as a digital camera. I wonder if they took some of the ideas from it.
They're so cheap nowadays. Look on ebay: $200!
macosftw 3 months ago
sorry i didn't find any review for a380.I want to now is the 380 same as 390?please reply.
SuperTechBuster 3 months ago
i have this camera does anyone know if it comes with video?
wat3rm3lonn 5 months ago
bought one of these was very good for a few months but the anti dust system is rubbish i put compressed gas in it, cleaned the mirror, cleaned the lenses and still have vast amounts of dust when i do a HDR
matthewthomas1234567 6 months ago
which one better a330 or a290??
Kyugunsou 1 year ago
Hey Can you recommend a good Zoom lens for the A230 camera? Anything 5X or higher
MovieTrailerGuide 1 year ago
which Brand takes a better qaulity picture...sony, nikon or canon? I cannot decide.
ammaretto 1 year ago
I like the new design, it looks sexy. Although it's not really a pro design.
Ishcoa 1 year ago
it looks very plasticky too.
frogparfait29 1 year ago
the only review i have seen which gives any negatives
matthewthomas1234567 1 year ago
Its a solid camera, the quality is far supirior to the newer Sony Nex 3 and 5, the live view is great, the screen is nice a solid, no video, you buy a slr for photos not videos, all in all great camera and lens
tigermankieran666 1 year ago
I got my hands on one today and I have to agree with a lot of people who said it does not feel plastic.I think the new design is refreshing as it has a bit more curves and feels less bulky. you did not really talk about live view performance or the cost and that its user interface is more friendly than other cameras.(something to include in the future)
I did like that you showed what came in the box.
frankliu532 1 year ago
is this better than the d3000?
AesirSovann 1 year ago
@AesirSovann Yes
tigermankieran666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you're looking to buy a dslr, then please check out the Samsung NX10. SAMSUNG NX10!!!!!
dbstjdals 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you're looking to buy a dslr, then please check out the Samsung NX10. SAMSUNG NX10!!!!!
dbstjdals 1 year ago
what is the background music?
jhol761 1 year ago
can you say "hater"?
vanessag388 1 year ago
This camera is well built, feels great, works flawlessly once u get to know it's perks amazing pics quality can be obtained. The left slide port access slot is pure genius. My only complain is the right lobe/grip doesn't fit in big hands . But that can easily be fixed by buying the 40$ STPHS1AMW Hand Strap for a™ (alpha) Digital SLR Cameras the hand strap is the most comfortable accessory a MUST buy make a huge difference.
ps3Mafiosito 1 year ago
sony is the best....i Own this camera and I love it.
BlkRover16 1 year ago
I don't know whether to get this camera or the Nikon D3000
SpotTrains 1 year ago
I don't know whether to get this camera or the Nikon D3000
SpotTrains 1 year ago
I just have to say, I've used this camera on a travel, and the design & grip is awesome, it took me by surprise, very sporty.
For the price its a good buy, the only drawback i have is that the noise capabilities is not as good, (as, a5XX)
whitecottonglove 2 years ago
nom
Wojtiskeyt 1 year ago
@whitecottonglove,
Travel? Is it worth carrying around? The bulkiness i mean? I was considering buying this type of SLR with an extra zoom lens.
sonofthedestroyer 1 year ago
If we talk DSLR's it's worth it because it's not very bulky, at least not the body, but with lens changing it was at times bothering... but my second DSLR was broken and at home. So if you are interested in photography it's worth it. Otherwise there is some good compacts too, but ISO noise is their biggest problem.
whitecottonglove 1 year ago
Does this dslr take videos? and if so is it good quality?
bmlvr786 2 years ago
No, it doesn`t.
dragoon0248 2 years ago
@bmlvr786 It depends, canon has 2 new models which records HD videos
musiverandom 1 year ago
i own this. i got it as a present [=
battlefieldx101 2 years ago 2
I'm trying to choose between the Nikon d3000 and this Sony A330. The sony one looks nicer.
jonnyl888 2 years ago
I was choosing between the same cameras the Sony is better
SMSKATER21 2 years ago 2
Choose which feels better in your hands. But in my opinion Nikon is better because you have a wider selection of lenses and 3rd party accessories. Also d3000 has faster continuous shooting and better for a beginner.
beagleman18 2 years ago
Plasticky?? I just tested out this camera and it has a rubberized texture feel to it and its definitely sturdy
ryan4618521 2 years ago 2
I think Nikon is just a tad better than Sony when it comes to making cameras...
TheWillOfMetatron 2 years ago 2
a tad? no..MUCH better.
freakedoutmatt 2 years ago
nah not when they remove the autofocus motor from their entry level dslrs.
suckme12321 2 years ago
true dat on the auto focus motor!
sony and nikon use the same sensors, however the firmware is very much so different. thus, the d3x with good high iso and the same sensor a850/900 with terrible high iso.
freakedoutmatt 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yes the d3x has very good high iso performance and the a850/a900 are not that good.. but that doesnt mean that a900/a850 sucks in high ISO perofrmance. and the recent a5x0 has improved their ISO performance. hope that sony could put their exmor R sensor into the dslrs. and noise problems would be solved.
suckme12321 2 years ago
and nikon has been using sony's sensor, CCD and CMOS. so I don't know why people are so biased.
suckme12321 2 years ago
@TheWillOfMetatron Your 100% right but you see that back in the Nikon´s price.
RobinMoviesOffical 2 years ago
Just bought this exact camera. I really like it so far. Also bought a 200x lens to go with it. I love it so far.
jmurrey253 2 years ago
hows that 200 goin for you? i have this camera and was lookin for a telephoto lens, i wasnt sure to go for the 200 or the 300 any advice since you own the a330?
cheers
FISHERMANPADDY 2 years ago
200 is really great. very reliable and the perfect amount of zoom i need. i guess a 300 would be better but i couldn't find a reason why i would need that much.
jmurrey253 2 years ago
Im very intresteted in photography alwayshave been im looking for a good camrea im not to crazyabout the 1000 $ range Ha! But im in the 100 to maxium 600$ Any tips PLEASE !! i REALLY NEEDhelp Thanks!! Photomad97-
photomad97 2 years ago
I think this guy's a little harsh. It looks like a really nice beginner dslr.
scottohscott 2 years ago 3
the other dslr's with video function are more expensive then this camera.... thats a point that is not mentioned
OcRaM86 2 years ago
the camera doesn't actually have a video function. The HDMI port is for viewing your photos on an HD tv. I wish it did have video though.
Sdfrien 2 years ago
i hate the background music
mrstreak101 2 years ago 3
Lol, it's iMovie sound effects. I only use them if I want to get a laugh out of people.
sargedesign 2 years ago
Which is better Canon 1000D or Sony a330?
jonathan920 2 years ago
Its a good camera, the design and small grip is not that big deal when you see it in real life, also makes it very compact and nice when carrying 2 dslr's. IQ is great... it obviously allways depends on the lens, but the new kit-lens is quite good!. ISO 100-1600 is ok. Sony's Live view is as expected the best you'll see around.
1897i 2 years ago
Out of the 12 reviews I have read for this camera, this is the second least useful. And the ONLY one that doesn't like the new body design. You show the box contents, which is unique, but the picture quality isn't talked about at all.
And you discount it because it doesn't have video mode? If I wanted a video camera, I wouldn't get a DSLR. Instead I'd keep my DSC point and shoot or, *gasp*, a video camera. I don't usually leave comments like this, but this review is too biased to be credible.
LubbockTweetup 2 years ago 31
I agree with LubbockTweetup wholeheartedly.
I am baffled by omission of the A330's positive attributes.
And yes, DSLR's are for taking photos; I wouldn't get one if I wanted to shoot videos!
redriaz 2 years ago
The copper colored version of the A330 looks intriguing, no?
dvamateur 2 years ago
If you want to see images taken with this exact camera go to my picasa page. Sorry but Youtube does not allow any comments resembling a link so I will just say go to Picasa dot-com and search for images tagged nosajck. If they are listed as taken by Blackriver 69 those are my images and all taken with the Sony a330.
The lens used were the 18-55 that came with the body as well as the Minolta AF 75-300 F4.5-5.6 2561-100 (1986 version). The images were taken in fine quality jpeg mode.
Blackriver69 2 years ago
good thing he doesn't discuss image quality WHATSOEVER in this review. but then again, IQ is certainly the least important factor when comparing cameras, amirite?
k20Tuner08 2 years ago
how would this compare to the canon rebel xs?
PinnacleTech 2 years ago
rebel - 2.5 lcd,3 fps more third party lens option, sony -2.7 lcd, 2.5 fps
Thats all i can think off lulz
spambryan17 2 years ago
am just starting to explore its many functions and other feature....... could this be gud for extra ordinary picture taking....without editng in photoshop programs?
2greenhorn 2 years ago
Rumor has it Canon has been in the camera business far longer than Sony.
ftpaddict 2 years ago
yep, and ford has been in the car business for a lot longer than toyota.
means nothing, really.
canadianroot 2 years ago 3
Plastic toy camera. :( The first DSLR I ever handled was the A100. I loved that thing.
ftpaddict 2 years ago 2
i held one of these things a couple days ago, and i really didn't like the feel and grip of the camera.
presnillajones 2 years ago
I don't like new design .. :(
PaveloSLS 2 years ago
I just bought this camera about a week back and so far it takes fantastic pictures...the image quality is superb and it's easier to carry and hold...so far i didnt see any problem with this camera...it's definitely a value for money buy!
saevan27 2 years ago 2
do you think its worth buying?
jjhparkour 2 years ago
I am really dissapointed with sony's new dslrs, they have deviated from the things that are important for an slr. I know they are trying to make slrs more apealing to beginners but that is not who an slr is for. live view is pointless, the hand grip is too small and the buttons and dials have been compromised, the thumb rest on the back is to close to the buttons. I want simpler cameras without all the auto settings, affordable full size sensors and it shuld be sized for human hands.
mnfthpst 2 years ago
I was playing with this camera today, and it didnt feel plasticy at all, you want it to weigh 50 lbs made in metal?
dereileak 2 years ago
The comment was made in comparison with the Sony A300/A350 which is much more robust. The A330 and the A380 are definitely more plastic then previous models which we believe is a great shame. The sliding door will trap dirt and make cleaning a nightmare - this makes it almost as bad as no protection.
DigitalRevCom 2 years ago
I still have to disagree with you, I think it feels solid, it has a great feel to it
dereileak 2 years ago 5
on top of that, most of the DSLR's with video modes dont have autofocus in video, so that has no reason why sony didn't decide to put video mode into it, I wish they had, but that is no excuse for that
dereileak 2 years ago 7
You are right that it has nothing to do with autofocus... our point was related to the method which Sony delivers Live View which would cause a problem as the Live View sensor is different from the image sensor. No other DSLRs in the market will have that problem. The difference exist because of different ways of focusing in Live View which Sony is in fact better.
DigitalRevCom 2 years ago
@dereileak you cant shoot a video with this camera???
hermanbrosNblackguy 1 year ago
@dereileak being the cheapest dslr out there,, it won't have everything...but it really is a great camera for those starting up,,,alot of people are holding back on dslr because of its high price and confusing menu... i just bought one off craiglist for 200 and it feels great and im enjoying it so far....
dsrevo79 1 year ago
Thank you for your comments. We are always happy to hear different opinions. Please also check out our other videos.
DigitalRevCom 2 years ago
@DigitalRevCom
This camera is well built, feels great, works flawlessly once u get to know it's perks ...amazing pics quality can be obtained. The left slide port access slot is pure genius. My only complain is the right lobe/grip doesn't fit in big hands . But that can easily be fixed by buying the 40$ STPHS1AMW Hand Strap for a™ (alpha) Digital SLR Cameras. The hand strap is the most comfortable accessory a MUST buy make a huge difference.
ps3Mafiosito 1 year ago
I dont see how you will get more dirt in the door, unless you roll your camera in dirt and spit on it, it wont be a nightmare, your simply overreacting
dereileak 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
only A900 is worth to buy, the rest from sony are shxts.....
whufee 2 years ago
I'm buying a Nikon, whos with me ?
MacBookProVideos 2 years ago
This camera is ugly.
MacBookProVideos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
5th comment !
MacBookProVideos 2 years ago
I want one!!!
MandeepGadgetBoy 2 years ago
whats the resolution of the lcd? is is the same as the a350?
Atlixco1984 2 years ago
Hi
It is good the the new Sony A330 camera came out. Having new features and look. But It does look like the old Minolta Dynax 5 but as a digital camera. I wonder if they took some of the ideas from it.
Good review on the A330 camera.
mike
miike111 2 years ago
i thought about buying this... went for a canon.
zanuha 2 years ago 8