You're talking about a small extreme group of feminists that I'm still not convinced actually exists. If you want to talk about reality, I'll be happy to continue this conversation, otherwise, I think you're a little bit paranoid.
ahhh, there it is, feminazis, I see where you get your crap from. Rush Limbaugh is a moron, if you believe anything that guy says you should be chemically castrated. Feminists and Nazis are about as similar as conservatives and Nazis, both blame all of their problems on the groups they hate (liberals and jews). Feminists don't want to exterminate men though, how would the human race continue without sperm?
Really? The f***ing Nazis? Why does everything on the internet end up with someone bringing up the f***ing Nazis? Feminists don't put Jews in ovens or invade European countries, there really isn't a comparison.
I second, and commend you for this video. Its sad that other men think defending women is so bad and that you will never get any pussy blah blah blah. Just keep doing what is right and hopefully if there are enough of us some progress can be made in the right direction.
Thank you for this video. I commend you, and am sorry you need to deal with the sexism you are facing from other male commentors. It's unfortunate that guys have to be so uncomfortable in their masculinity and bash any guy who dares defend women. These other people obviously hate women so much it is impossible for them to understand anyone caring about us women because it is right, and that not all men are interested in pussy. Thank you again.
If you only get 2 minutes of pleasure from a woman it means you are a "pendejo". Go take in your culo,mangina. It's thanks to maricones like you that bitches think who the fuck they are.
I don't need to get women to "fall for my shit". I don't need to trick ladies into going out with me. What's creepy is that you have nothing better to do than go on youtube and call someone you don't know a fag for no reason. Get a fucking life.
Yeah. You're what the women like to call an "LJBF." (Let's just be friends). You'll never get past the "friend zone." Why? Because women aren't attracted to pussies.
And mother fucker, you don't "respect" women. You kowtow to them. That is why women won't really ever have respect for you. You think ur such a great guy by joining their "self-victimizing/man-blaming" movement while trying to make urself look good by demonizing other men in general. The truth is, you're just a kowtowing Feminist Mangina that will let a woman walk over you in a relationship to the point where she'll start fuckin the mail man.
A)"Getting laid" isn't my top priority in life. I'd much rather have a loving relationship with a woman than to see how much pussy I can get. As you can see, I am a good looking man, I could get laid as much as I want if I tried to just get laid. But I prefer the companionship from an actual relationship than the 2 minutes of pleasure you usually get from a woman.
B)It's clear that you're insecure in your manliness, so you try to act all macho. I'm glad I'm more confident in myself than you are.
C) I already mentioned your relationship with your future wife and the mailman. As cliche as that sounds, it's bound to happen.
& D) You obviously have no game to think that "looks" are what get men laid. I have looks too, but looks are not what generates real attraction. Nor do women use it as an anchor that will determine her long term attraction to you. That's a misperceived concept of value--what a guy THINKS a woman wants when it comes to attraction.
I didn't say Beck makes you profound. Beck is respectable, Nickelback is over-produced radio music. They are good at what they do, making songs that are catchy, but they are not exactly gifted musicians, or lyricists. You simply called me a punk. You didn't refute ANY of my points... You just called me a name, with nothing to back it up. How are you trying to take the high road here all of a sudden?
No high road, just the obvious. Wright or Wrong, your defiantly a punk. others see the same thing..u 2, a little. POINT demonstrated by bringing music into it, u know this already. A lot of young guys "think" they have all the answers. Point of view is immaterial to this conversation so I feel no need to correct u; your desire to show off & feel morally superior is why ur a Punk. U think your witty and profound, u are not. Come back and view your videos in 5 years
First off, by stating that what I say isn't important, all you care about is that I am a "young punk" really shows you as being pretty ignorant. Also, I looked at your favorites, many of them were Nickelback videos. Wow, you've got class my friend, if by class I meant horrible musical taste. You fooled me with the Beck videos you had in there. I almost thought you had a clue. Did you actually watch my video?
yes....bla, bla, bla....you men turn to your wife now and just call her the "C" word...see what happens...
it is about respect, and I think this young man did a great job showing that McCain does not respect women, or he would have never placed Palin as a vice.
If he became president, two years from now, Palin would be seen wearing no make-up and in her p.j's, afraid to raise her head and make eye contact.
If women were not making sexist and crude jokes about men, I might agree with you.
Feminists regularly joke and laugh about cutting off a man's penis. I grew up feminist, with a feminist mother, so I heard all of these kinds of jokes regularly. Yet, very few times are the called to the carpet on their misandry.
It is for this reason I support neither party. I'm a humanist, not a feminist not a masculinist. Rights AND responsibilities should be equal. Either all can joke like that or none can.
When electing a politician voters need to determine whether or nor the politician feels that issues that are important to you should be addressed. Feminists are generally concerned about issues that are important to women, such as equality.
There are people who say inappropriate things about a group of people. However, it is incorrect to assume that because they belong to a specific group that everyone in that group hold the same bias.
Feminists are interested in superiority, not equality.The laws that they seek to pass which strip men of EQUAL rights demonstrates this.
I agree that not all persons in a group represent everyone in that group. However, key feminists have been anti male, often with calls of violence towards men. The result in just one example of non-equality is that Domestic Violence directed towards men is ignored and denied by our laws and our society, despite its overwhelming occurrence.
When someone spews nonsense it is hard not to ignore them. Comments like yours are a gross distortion of facts, if they were more absurd would be considered lies.
'When someone has a small speck of dust on ones sleeve, we do not discard the shirt.'
Things have changed over time, but grasping for straws in no way supports your argument.
My comments are entirely factual. It is a typical feminist ploy to claim that facts are not facts.
Fact: Feminism is not about EQUAL rights but women's rights.
Fact: DV perpetrators are equal in both genders.
Fact: The law overwhelmingly favors women in these cases, convicting men and not women.
None of these are at all a distortion. But women's rights advocates (rather than human rights advocates), have a vested interest in claiming otherwise.
Women's rights are a subset of Human rights. Which include many other social rights, such as religious freedom, gay rights, racial equality. These rights address currently and historical discrimination/inequalities.
By that reasoning, then any group that wishes for itself rights or entitlements, that it does not make sure every group has, is likewise about human rights.
Historically men and women have faced discrimination and inequalities across the spectrum. It has not been mostly women that have been oppressed. It has always been a few that maintain control over others. The same is mostly true today, but many of us are not as bad off as we were 500 years ago or 2000.
You can continue to disillusion yourself and continue to stretch the truth. The values that you seem to have is inconsistent with those that really care. It should have been obvious from your original claims, but now it is obvious.
I have made very specific statements about very specific issues. Your claim that my statements of fact are inaccurate is simply false. Again you follow a typical feminist ploy. You're making a generic claim, but not stating exactly which of my statements are "stretched".
You claim that my values are inconsistent. Which values? They are inconsistent with what? How do they differ from my original claims?
"Feminists are interested in superiority, not equality." The statement is a logical fallacy, taking a statement to encapsulate a varied group is devious. This the same logic that transversed through your entire argument. One wishes you well in your self discovery and understanding of others.
Not a logical fallacy at all. Simply read feminists literature, claims, legislative attempts and stated goals is enough to prove this. Though they claim often that they seek equality, their other false claims, goals and so on simply prove this to be a large lie.
Yes you are deceiving because the argument is non-existent.
"Mr. McCain, do you think it is fair that the USA won't let people live on Mars, but will let them live on Venus?"
That's what we call a bait and switch. There are other REAL issues that need to be debated. This thing about companies paying for viagra but not paying for birth control is FALSE because it doesnt happen. Now if you have a list of insurance companies that pay for viagra but not birth control, I would love to see it.
The question McCain was asked is if it is fair that some, not all, some, insurance companies cover Viagra, but not birth control. No one said this is common, but it does happen in some cases, is that fair? Does that make sense? No. I am not deceiving anyone, none of the facts that I have presented are false.
Additionally I would be interested in a list of companies that just do not pay for birth control (or portions) regardless of the viagra argument. And this is why it's not a real argument and thus his answer doesn't matter.
But, there are REAL reasons not to vote for the man. Here is one. Has he ever voted for a law, which would not pass constitutional muster? Has his opponent? If the answer is yes and especially if the number of times is significant, WHY should I vote for either of them?
But, I want to give you credit. A lot of times people delete opposing comments. By not doing so you've opened the potential for good dialog between us. Though I disagree with the content of your video, your thoughts are well presented and I hope you keep up the good work.
I agree with you fully. But, it is typically the way on feminist websites. I am a reformed feminist. Now, I am for equal rights for all persons regardless of gender. Whereas feminism is specifically for rights for women. You will find often if you ask reasonable questions your comments will be deleted.
Example: "Shouldn't we help men that are victims of domestic violence at the hands of women?" This will result in a denial of the problem and a prompt banning.
Carly Fiorina, an adviser of John McCain's, is the one who raised the issue. Maybe she could give you a list of companies, I'm not in the mood to look them up right now :)
Actually I work in the insurance industry. There aren't any of note. If there are any at all they are very tiny companies, and most likely self insured providers (where the business acts as its own insurance company). And in those cases even it is most likely that they are Christian companies. (Churches and the like). And I support their right to abide their moral standards.
But again none that pay for viagra but not for birth control.
Here we go. Sorry bro, but most insurance companies do not cover viagra and most do cover birth control. It is a matter of economics for them. Viagra is much more expensive than birth control. A birth, is MUCH more expensive than birth control.
This is getting to be a tired argument of Obama supporters.
Here is my msg to both parties, pay attention to the large numbers of votes you are going to see third parties get this election. We're fed up with the deception of you and your followers.
Jeez so many of these 'men' commenting have some serious mummy issues.
Charmedlassie18 1 year ago
Comment removed
9N8X 2 years ago 3
You're talking about a small extreme group of feminists that I'm still not convinced actually exists. If you want to talk about reality, I'll be happy to continue this conversation, otherwise, I think you're a little bit paranoid.
ProgRev 2 years ago
Comment removed
9N8X 2 years ago 3
@9N8X You're an actual moron.
Charmedlassie18 1 year ago
Comment removed
9N8X 2 years ago 2
ahhh, there it is, feminazis, I see where you get your crap from. Rush Limbaugh is a moron, if you believe anything that guy says you should be chemically castrated. Feminists and Nazis are about as similar as conservatives and Nazis, both blame all of their problems on the groups they hate (liberals and jews). Feminists don't want to exterminate men though, how would the human race continue without sperm?
ProgRev 2 years ago
Comment removed
9N8X 2 years ago
Comment removed
9N8X 2 years ago
Really? The f***ing Nazis? Why does everything on the internet end up with someone bringing up the f***ing Nazis? Feminists don't put Jews in ovens or invade European countries, there really isn't a comparison.
ProgRev 2 years ago
Comment removed
9N8X 2 years ago 3
@9N8X No need to explain your views here. But feminists are worse; they infect our pussy supply.
Dr9steen 1 year ago
I second, and commend you for this video. Its sad that other men think defending women is so bad and that you will never get any pussy blah blah blah. Just keep doing what is right and hopefully if there are enough of us some progress can be made in the right direction.
rmarcum0199 3 years ago
Thank you for this video. I commend you, and am sorry you need to deal with the sexism you are facing from other male commentors. It's unfortunate that guys have to be so uncomfortable in their masculinity and bash any guy who dares defend women. These other people obviously hate women so much it is impossible for them to understand anyone caring about us women because it is right, and that not all men are interested in pussy. Thank you again.
woeXkitten 3 years ago
If you only get 2 minutes of pleasure from a woman it means you are a "pendejo". Go take in your culo,mangina. It's thanks to maricones like you that bitches think who the fuck they are.
vastedda99 3 years ago
get a chick 1 good looking chick on here supporting you and showing she is into you....your CREEPY up in bedroom with a bunch of hand cream
1a2b3c100t 3 years ago
dude, you are such a fag, go get some pussy, I know....it doesn't work, women don't fall for your shit....so transparent. YOUR CREEPY
1a2b3c100t 3 years ago
I don't need to get women to "fall for my shit". I don't need to trick ladies into going out with me. What's creepy is that you have nothing better to do than go on youtube and call someone you don't know a fag for no reason. Get a fucking life.
ProgRev 3 years ago
Progrev, you are a feminist pussified Mangina. You're one of those guys that will never get laid. Fuckin pussy.
Ohfoshoh 3 years ago 2
You're right, women HATE guys who respect them. Get a clue jackass.
ProgRev 3 years ago
Yeah. You're what the women like to call an "LJBF." (Let's just be friends). You'll never get past the "friend zone." Why? Because women aren't attracted to pussies.
Ohfoshoh 3 years ago
And mother fucker, you don't "respect" women. You kowtow to them. That is why women won't really ever have respect for you. You think ur such a great guy by joining their "self-victimizing/man-blaming" movement while trying to make urself look good by demonizing other men in general. The truth is, you're just a kowtowing Feminist Mangina that will let a woman walk over you in a relationship to the point where she'll start fuckin the mail man.
Ohfoshoh 3 years ago 5
A)"Getting laid" isn't my top priority in life. I'd much rather have a loving relationship with a woman than to see how much pussy I can get. As you can see, I am a good looking man, I could get laid as much as I want if I tried to just get laid. But I prefer the companionship from an actual relationship than the 2 minutes of pleasure you usually get from a woman.
B)It's clear that you're insecure in your manliness, so you try to act all macho. I'm glad I'm more confident in myself than you are.
ProgRev 3 years ago
Don't forget...
C) I already mentioned your relationship with your future wife and the mailman. As cliche as that sounds, it's bound to happen.
& D) You obviously have no game to think that "looks" are what get men laid. I have looks too, but looks are not what generates real attraction. Nor do women use it as an anchor that will determine her long term attraction to you. That's a misperceived concept of value--what a guy THINKS a woman wants when it comes to attraction.
Ohfoshoh 3 years ago
Women are not attracted to kowtowing pussies--no matter how good you think you "look."
Your prize-winning "long-term relationship" is going to suck because she will not respect you.
Ohfoshoh 3 years ago
Male feminists are real misogynists in disguise.
Ohfoshoh 3 years ago
Comment removed
rmarcum0199 3 years ago
I listen to beck so that makes me profound, i listen to Nickelback so that makes me uniformed....I can't believe Im in this conversation
marcef100t 3 years ago 2
I didn't say Beck makes you profound. Beck is respectable, Nickelback is over-produced radio music. They are good at what they do, making songs that are catchy, but they are not exactly gifted musicians, or lyricists. You simply called me a punk. You didn't refute ANY of my points... You just called me a name, with nothing to back it up. How are you trying to take the high road here all of a sudden?
ProgRev 3 years ago
No high road, just the obvious. Wright or Wrong, your defiantly a punk. others see the same thing..u 2, a little. POINT demonstrated by bringing music into it, u know this already. A lot of young guys "think" they have all the answers. Point of view is immaterial to this conversation so I feel no need to correct u; your desire to show off & feel morally superior is why ur a Punk. U think your witty and profound, u are not. Come back and view your videos in 5 years
marcef100t 3 years ago
this "smart guy" is so proud of himself, who cares what he has to say, all we can see is a young and dumb self righteous punk!
marcef100t 3 years ago
First off, by stating that what I say isn't important, all you care about is that I am a "young punk" really shows you as being pretty ignorant. Also, I looked at your favorites, many of them were Nickelback videos. Wow, you've got class my friend, if by class I meant horrible musical taste. You fooled me with the Beck videos you had in there. I almost thought you had a clue. Did you actually watch my video?
ProgRev 3 years ago
punk
marcef100t 3 years ago
Thank you
ProgRev 3 years ago
yes....bla, bla, bla....you men turn to your wife now and just call her the "C" word...see what happens...
it is about respect, and I think this young man did a great job showing that McCain does not respect women, or he would have never placed Palin as a vice.
If he became president, two years from now, Palin would be seen wearing no make-up and in her p.j's, afraid to raise her head and make eye contact.
wlwanda 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My gawd someone shoot this fucker in the head.....
elixir656 3 years ago
I am a cyborg, you can't kill me.
ProgRev 3 years ago
You need to have a TV or radio show. Good job.
juicearibe 3 years ago
He chose Viagara over birth control. That is ridiculous!
confusedandhorrified 3 years ago
A very well though out argument. Many people are still scratching their head on why McCain selected Palin.
McCain is not very concerned about women issues, and has made sexist or crude jokes about women.
Anyways, Palin is not a feminist in any sense either.
omiteru 3 years ago
If women were not making sexist and crude jokes about men, I might agree with you.
Feminists regularly joke and laugh about cutting off a man's penis. I grew up feminist, with a feminist mother, so I heard all of these kinds of jokes regularly. Yet, very few times are the called to the carpet on their misandry.
It is for this reason I support neither party. I'm a humanist, not a feminist not a masculinist. Rights AND responsibilities should be equal. Either all can joke like that or none can.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
When electing a politician voters need to determine whether or nor the politician feels that issues that are important to you should be addressed. Feminists are generally concerned about issues that are important to women, such as equality.
There are people who say inappropriate things about a group of people. However, it is incorrect to assume that because they belong to a specific group that everyone in that group hold the same bias.
omiteru 3 years ago
Feminists are interested in superiority, not equality.The laws that they seek to pass which strip men of EQUAL rights demonstrates this.
I agree that not all persons in a group represent everyone in that group. However, key feminists have been anti male, often with calls of violence towards men. The result in just one example of non-equality is that Domestic Violence directed towards men is ignored and denied by our laws and our society, despite its overwhelming occurrence.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
When someone spews nonsense it is hard not to ignore them. Comments like yours are a gross distortion of facts, if they were more absurd would be considered lies.
'When someone has a small speck of dust on ones sleeve, we do not discard the shirt.'
Things have changed over time, but grasping for straws in no way supports your argument.
omiteru 3 years ago
My comments are entirely factual. It is a typical feminist ploy to claim that facts are not facts.
Fact: Feminism is not about EQUAL rights but women's rights.
Fact: DV perpetrators are equal in both genders.
Fact: The law overwhelmingly favors women in these cases, convicting men and not women.
None of these are at all a distortion. But women's rights advocates (rather than human rights advocates), have a vested interest in claiming otherwise.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
An exaggeration of facts does not make the exaggeration a fact.
omiteru 3 years ago
I have exaggerated nothing. Claiming something is an exaggeration does not make that fact, not a fact.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
Women's rights are a subset of Human rights. Which include many other social rights, such as religious freedom, gay rights, racial equality. These rights address currently and historical discrimination/inequalities.
omiteru 3 years ago
No.
By that reasoning, then any group that wishes for itself rights or entitlements, that it does not make sure every group has, is likewise about human rights.
Historically men and women have faced discrimination and inequalities across the spectrum. It has not been mostly women that have been oppressed. It has always been a few that maintain control over others. The same is mostly true today, but many of us are not as bad off as we were 500 years ago or 2000.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
You can continue to disillusion yourself and continue to stretch the truth. The values that you seem to have is inconsistent with those that really care. It should have been obvious from your original claims, but now it is obvious.
omiteru 3 years ago
I have made very specific statements about very specific issues. Your claim that my statements of fact are inaccurate is simply false. Again you follow a typical feminist ploy. You're making a generic claim, but not stating exactly which of my statements are "stretched".
You claim that my values are inconsistent. Which values? They are inconsistent with what? How do they differ from my original claims?
I'm laying bets as to your next statement.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
"Feminists are interested in superiority, not equality." The statement is a logical fallacy, taking a statement to encapsulate a varied group is devious. This the same logic that transversed through your entire argument. One wishes you well in your self discovery and understanding of others.
omiteru 3 years ago
Not a logical fallacy at all. Simply read feminists literature, claims, legislative attempts and stated goals is enough to prove this. Though they claim often that they seek equality, their other false claims, goals and so on simply prove this to be a large lie.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
@aoirthoir very well said
themaniusedtob 1 year ago
JUST SAY NO TO PALIN IN '08'!
NOTOPALIN08 3 years ago
Thank you.
Nakaren0Baby 3 years ago
Yes you are deceiving because the argument is non-existent.
"Mr. McCain, do you think it is fair that the USA won't let people live on Mars, but will let them live on Venus?"
That's what we call a bait and switch. There are other REAL issues that need to be debated. This thing about companies paying for viagra but not paying for birth control is FALSE because it doesnt happen. Now if you have a list of insurance companies that pay for viagra but not birth control, I would love to see it.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
The question McCain was asked is if it is fair that some, not all, some, insurance companies cover Viagra, but not birth control. No one said this is common, but it does happen in some cases, is that fair? Does that make sense? No. I am not deceiving anyone, none of the facts that I have presented are false.
ProgRev 3 years ago
Additionally I would be interested in a list of companies that just do not pay for birth control (or portions) regardless of the viagra argument. And this is why it's not a real argument and thus his answer doesn't matter.
But, there are REAL reasons not to vote for the man. Here is one. Has he ever voted for a law, which would not pass constitutional muster? Has his opponent? If the answer is yes and especially if the number of times is significant, WHY should I vote for either of them?
aoirthoir 3 years ago
But, I want to give you credit. A lot of times people delete opposing comments. By not doing so you've opened the potential for good dialog between us. Though I disagree with the content of your video, your thoughts are well presented and I hope you keep up the good work.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
I hate when people delete comments because they disagree. It's silly to do that, it's a sign of weakness really.
ProgRev 3 years ago
I agree with you fully. But, it is typically the way on feminist websites. I am a reformed feminist. Now, I am for equal rights for all persons regardless of gender. Whereas feminism is specifically for rights for women. You will find often if you ask reasonable questions your comments will be deleted.
Example: "Shouldn't we help men that are victims of domestic violence at the hands of women?" This will result in a denial of the problem and a prompt banning.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
Carly Fiorina, an adviser of John McCain's, is the one who raised the issue. Maybe she could give you a list of companies, I'm not in the mood to look them up right now :)
ProgRev 3 years ago
Actually I work in the insurance industry. There aren't any of note. If there are any at all they are very tiny companies, and most likely self insured providers (where the business acts as its own insurance company). And in those cases even it is most likely that they are Christian companies. (Churches and the like). And I support their right to abide their moral standards.
But again none that pay for viagra but not for birth control.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
Correction. I work in the MEDICAL industry. And we have to deal with insurance issues. Don't mean to appear to mislead.
aoirthoir 3 years ago
Here we go. Sorry bro, but most insurance companies do not cover viagra and most do cover birth control. It is a matter of economics for them. Viagra is much more expensive than birth control. A birth, is MUCH more expensive than birth control.
This is getting to be a tired argument of Obama supporters.
Here is my msg to both parties, pay attention to the large numbers of votes you are going to see third parties get this election. We're fed up with the deception of you and your followers.
aoirthoir 3 years ago