(sigh) Still educating folks in English; a never-ending task, apparently.
Scare quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase to indicate that it does not signify its literal or conventional meaning. - Wiki, Scare Quotes
Quotation marks can also be used to indicate a different meaning of a word or phrase than the one typically associated with it and are often used to express irony. - Wiki, Quotation Mark
@krisdevalle Either way, the product was manufactured from NASA themselves and they sent it to Jarrah to do a demonstration. Jarrah proved that no footprint could have been created using that product and therefore, NASA never went to the moon. Simple stuff Kris!
Hmm... indeed! Flawless logic. Kind of like when you need to go to the nearby village you will obviously choose to go by plane. Apart from the fact you'll first need to travel to the airport (which is probably farther away than the village), then fly to another airport (God only knows where that one is), and then get from the second airport to the village you set out to go to. Indeed, the logic behind is impeccable. Impeccable as in retarded.
Hey lander fucktards. The moon mission's were giant failures.. Suck it up like at least a one nut man would do.. But the good news is that you get another chance by voting for Newt!!! He's going to get a city going on up there. Shit hot damn!!!!!
I always wanted to believe that NASA went to the moon, but they didn't and that's too bad! Why wouldn't anyone really want to believe that NASA went the moon? That's not what this forum is about and that's what I try to address. Why not question its reality? These shills get so worked up when anyone shows any disbelief or when an experiment shows any little bit of proof toward a hoax, the shills get so personal like they have something to hide?
Just because bedroom experiments may have turned out badly for some people doesn't mean that Jarrah's *scientific* one wasn't valid. Apollo hoax! ;-)
@nameofthepen What makes it rather amusing is that you feel that he used accurate lunar simulant to prove NASA never went to the moon, thus rendering the lunar simulant inaccurate.
So if they never went, what is the simulant simulating?
None of you turkeys seem to be able to answer that simple question.
You're now posing questions to yourself and answering your own questions on the air? Are you absolutely certain you're not starting to develop schizophrenia?
It's too predictable of a video from my point of view. If these men really travelled all the way to the moon, you would certainly think they would be worried or would show some uncertainty in their voices. They didn't because they had nothing to worry about. Wink Wink! :)
So they spent billions of dollars (and even if you believe its fake they spent billions of dollars making the saturn V's etc) but because the people behind the "Hoax" neglected to tell these actors to sound worried, that's proof that it's faked.
I've never noticed any astronaut's sounding worried as it happens... I suppose the international space station is also fake because the astronauts on it don't sound worried either....
@paulosio Watch the Jarrah White video that shows how Aldrin's footprints were not possible to make! That's not too hard to watch even for you. If you can't understand it, I can explain it to you and to Kris. You both seem a little slow!
@paulosio You have no brain. If you did you would know buy now that the International Space Station is only 150 miles off the ground. The Moon is way out 230,000 Miles AWAY!!! lol Do you have any understanding of the difference?
If you just forget the whole space race and all this hoax nonsense and just see it as a couple human beings on the moon, it sends shivers down my spine to think they were the only people on it at that time and now it has been left empty for years and years. I wish I could go there one day..
I now expect one of the tards to come up and say Neil's mistake was intentional, so that when the hoaxtards would eventually crawl out from under their rocks and claim it was faked NASA could say just what you did, "why did we not re-shoot it then?"
@TheBaldmeister You know something; I really question the moon landing for many reasons. I also wonder a lot about the preparation of the dialogue too. It's as if the astronauts had a script planned before they left the planet. I mean, there was nothing strange about their voices from the time they stepped on to the moon "One small step for man ..." from the time they departed "What a ride, what a ride." In my opinion, the script was planned well ahead. Drama at its best! :)
@mrwonderfulman2011 After questioning the validity of the NASA claim and researching and examining all the evidence against them, anyone with any common sense can see that they whole thing was Bull Shit.
@Aeronauticalexplorer If you watch that Jarrah White video about making footprints in the lunar soil, he completely deflates the Mythbusters demo and shows how they're a bunch of idiots that are in bed with NASA and manipulate an experiment to the point where they find the results they were hoping to find. They can't even do any experiment properly whereas White shows how moisture would be needed otherwise the dust collapses in on itself. The Buzz Aldrin little boy footprint is a complete joke!
@mrwonderfulman2011 I know. The Mythbusters always have a predetermind outcome with the NASA experiments. Did you see the one they did with the Wire support and slow motion video? They called it "Busted" but never did the slow motion with the wire support On. The did them seperate. So Jarrah White took the video of the Mythbuster Jamie on the wire and Slowed it down and PRESTO instant NASA video Astronot jump. Exactly the same as the NASA video. Slow Motion AND the wire support is what NASA used
@krisdevalle So your theory is that if don't see it, it is not there? You crack me up with your stupidity. You remind be of a dumb blonde headed bimbo. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just knowing that we are little beings on a large ball floating in an unimaginably vast space makes me wonder why everything is the way it is. That is when I found a website called Truth Contest. You can search it in google and click on the top result. Then read "The Present" on the homepage.
At least the world is slowly catching on and questioning the reality of the so called moon landing. The answers will come forward eventually in the future.
How about you stop pulling questions out of your ass in the hope you're going to catch an eventual fault by one of us, when it's obvious we're not making them (since we're telling the truth), and since you only end up ridiculing yourself further? I mean, "dust snows gently onto the Moon" what the flying fuck? How high do you have to be to write something like that? What are you on to even think up such nonsense? And especially, where can I get some of that?
@nameofthepen I no longer put any trust or any real value in the Mythbusters demonstrations from now on. They clearly manipulate their experiments to the point where they get the results they want to find. These so called "shills" put so much priority in the Mythbusters' demonstrations when they're not even doing their experiments properly. I think there's a scientific word for it all? Oh yeah, it's called experimental bias!
Hey, what kind of work do you do? Oh, I am a part-time weekend replacement shill for the full time shills' off days. Great pay, but I feel so dirty afterwards. Like Pilate and Hamlet's mom, I sometimes think I will never get clean.
Anyway, the focus of the question is the relative humidity of the command module. Should be zero.
The primary source of the dust is the cosmos. The time period is billions of years. Like a gentle snow with no wind, the dust falls evenly and covers everything evenly. There will be some variation near the edges of steep inclines whose angles are such that the lunar gravity and momentum are stonger than the frictional force stopping the dust.
Because there is no erosive force or other disturbance, where a bit of dust stops, it stays. Falls evenly, stays even. Simple blow hard
And there I was thinking you couldn't get any more high. I stand corrected.
Seriously, like sand on th Earth is just fine grains of stone, the same applies to regolith. As we all know, there's no snow in space, and much less does it snow lunar dust. Rather, there are numberless micrometeorites flying around at crazy speeds and wreaking havoc wherever they can. They quickly burn up in Earth's atmosphere, but easily reach the ground on the Moon, "eroding" the surface.
Pretty sure some might have hit them, but one thing is exposure through billions of years (like your associate) stated, a wholly another 3 measly hours. Also, the suits were designed to withstand impacts up to a certain degree.
They call them "micro" because they are really small. They fall evenly across the real lunar surface, making very little difference to the overall thickness of the real lunar dust. Like the solar protons, they hit in all directions, there being no atmosphere, including nearly parallel to the real lunar surface
The micrometeors are another proof that no one went to the moon; they are random, constant and penetrating. There is no safe time period on the moon
Sure. Like I said, the candy selling pirate unicorn has a discount today.
In the real world and in the real universe, little is uniform. If it were, then we wouldn't have mountains and valleys, and the Moon wouldn't be scattered with craters all over its surface (it would be all just one big crater uniformly deep throughout the whole lunar surface). Once again you show just how poor thought out you moontard shill claims are.
Apart from the last point you've posted nothing put butthurt accusations, because obviously you've got nothing to counter my points but you were still trying to save face (which, I should add, was a vain attempt). As for your last point lucky that I used quotation marks, because I obviously know erosion isn't the proper term, but it's close enough, point in case you understood perfectly what I meant.
So yep, u mad... and my points still stand undisputed.
@krisdevalle Perhaps he thinks "The Mouse On The Moon" was a documentary. :)
I remember NASA arranged the seismograph on the moons surface so that they could use the LEM's boost stage as a signal source. They discovered, that under the surface rock, the moon is made of a very hard sort of green cheese.
The "wrapper" layer is made out of light elements almost exclusively. This helped to explain a lot of things like why it doesn't look like green cheese.
I asked you where you got your knowledge of the moon from. You appear to be very skeptical of many information sources, so I wish to know which ones you trust?
@krisdevalle I don't trust a word you say Kris. The Jarrah White video is highly reliable from my point of view; however, you see it as a complete flaw, but I really don't think you took any time to watch it. What don't you like about the video Kris? Are you really that daffy? Maybe wearing that hat for too long has finally got to you? ): Poor Kris!
@mrwonderfulman2011 He even admitted that he will not watch a Jarrah White video because he doesn't like Jarrah's his voice. Meanwhile Kris probably sounds the same. They are both from Australia.
@mrwonderfulman2011 If I ever saw him in a Bar or a Pub wearing that hat, I would smack it right off his head and when he goes to pick it up, I would step on it and hold it down with my foot.
@Aeronauticalexplorer He's just a Croc Dundee wanabee! He's not half the man Dundee is anyway? No one would be dumb enough to believe in the moon landing.
@Aeronauticalexplorer Wow you guys are so angry. Jarrah White is all 'argh help I'm being stalked' and then we have you guys threatening to strike me if you saw me.
@krisdevalle "These guys were test pilots ..." The perfect selection to cover it all up then? If questions concerning their safety ever came about, we would just direct people back to the answer ... they were test pilots! Born with the ability to "keep cool" and afraid of nothing! Yeah, that's brilliant Kris! You'll have to do a lot better than that Handsome! :)
@paulosio HA HA ha ha. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the truth came out about Gagarin. They admitted He was NOT the 1st man in space. Get a clue kid.
@krisdevalle Kris, you're full of sour onions and need a diaper change! The Jarrah White video showed how deep Aldrin dug his boot into the soil whereas the Mythbusters never went down more than a millimetre. When a boot is dug into the dry soil without any water vapour (moisture) the dust collapses in on itself kris! This is not too difficult to understand?
@krisdevalle The proof that they used wire supports to simulate 1:6 gravity is enough for anyone to understand that the whole thing was faked. They never walked on the Moon. It has been proven already. Get over it.
@CNN911Fakes - Similar to so many other gems from GeneralSweetie.
"The number of stars isn't infinite... If it were, you'd always see a white sky, regardless of daytime or nighttime. There just wouldn't be any "void" in between the stars." - GeneralSamov, 1 month ago
Indeed, that's what I said. Of course monkeys like you or CornFlakes can't understand this fact, but proper scientists do. In fact, what I said is called the Olbers' paradox. You should look it up.
@krisdevalle Kris, do you really get paid for being on here covering up the fake moon landing? They must not pay you much eh? If they did, you would certainly afford a better looking hat at least. :)
@krisdevalle You certainly invest quite a bit of time on here though? Just curious that's all? In any case, no one wants to believe the moon landing was a complete fake, but it was Kris! Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Besides, I seem to recall you said you believe in God. So, don't you also believe in the bible? Because according to the bible the world is only 6000 years old or so. Not billions of years what is this I don't even
@MegaLogaritmo, the website is virtually useless. First, most of us don't speak Portuguese. Second, the website isn't even complete! The "Sobre nos" page gives no information about who created the website. If this is important astrophysical information, you have more work to do to tell the world!
@LunarTuner; resumo, só para ti ( estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt ): in the center of stars, planets and moons, there is a type of antimatter that repels everything as like poles of magnets, but in enormous proportions, much more repelling herself when separated, and this cause the shape of the ellipsoids orbits of moons and planets. Also repels the magma within a certain distance, where it forms a repulsive barrier compressed by the magma. AMC(man on the moon:NASA lie!)
@COMMOGSE : não, isso é porque estás observando um espelho. Também pudera, tem tanto idiota neste planeta que aqui, no You Tube, tais não se ausentariam, mesmo. Xingar, todos podem aqui. Divulgar uma das maiores descobertas da astrofísica contemporânea, isso é para poucos. See estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
No matter how many times I see this video, I gives me chills everytime. What a fantastic achievement for USA / mankind. And this was back in 1969!! unbelivable !. From a 'human' perspective, whan an experience must it have been, to lift off, travel further and faster than anyone else on the history of your planet, on a minute tin-foil capsule and then land on our moon. Wow...I'm speechless.
In scenes from the first step in "moon", the horizon is too close, in scenes without distortion, where the camera is on height of helmet of the ACTOR! Read the comments on my channel. The man was never on the moon! I am the author of estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
i wish people would stop using methods to try to debunk that this is fake bs and just use their common sense. this shit never happened. this 2012 and people are still gullible enough to believe this crap. conspiracies do exist people. theres millions of people that still think a plane hit the pentagon when it's in no way possible. believing everything your govt. tells you is nothing more than blind patriotism. i hope one day to see people with brains in this country.
@DecayedOfferings, there are ~ 20,000 photos of Apollo's 9 missions; 100 hrs of video; 842 lbs. of samples free to any geologist in the world who requests them; retroreflectors on the moon detected by observatories in many countries & Apollo was the only thing launched to get those there; independent tracking by USSR & UK; Indy photos of Apollo 8's TLI burn; Millions of documents; Millions watched launches.
Why listen to you instead of astronomers, physicists and geologists?
@DecayedOfferings, Oh, they convinced you it was debunked? I assume they were well-qualified--more qualified than the PhD scientists who designed your computer, your airliner, your phone, your TV and the satellite that gives you communications? I challenge you to find ONE of those PhD scientists who believes the evidence of the Apollo program has been "debunked."
Why, the Dead sea scrolls obviously, coupled with the gospel according to Matthew and why not, even the book of Mormon thrown in for good measure. What you end up could best be described as something resembling a Vicki Bennet song...
(warning: retainment of mental sanity is not guaranteed - handle with care /watch?v=DT8dW9DF5TU)
@Aeronauticalexplorer, Joseph Goebbels said, "“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
Is it your plan to just repeat your own personal opinion over and over and over until people believe it? Good luck with that. May I suggest that you show us evidence of this studio, tell us where it is, offer testimony from someone who saw it or photos or documentation of it. That might work better for you.
Before you reply again. that list of changes were of the cuff knowledge. when you can think w/o wiki references come see me. I'm not here to give you comments on your video, so you might need to find another source of income.
LMAO at the comments here. Shit guys stop beating each other up. 'The Earth's atmosphere does not suddenly end at a particular altitude and space begins. In fact, the Earth's atmosphere continues out for more than 1,000 miles into space.'
James A. Van Allen is one overrated man. He said hey guys can you put a Geiger counter on that rocket? Shit, if they offered me a boss ass job, a kick ass paycheck and promised to make my name infamous, I'd probably say whatever they wanted too. Shit the guy that first came up with the idea to put something between you ass and a horse wasn't named blanket or saddle, was he
First,Van Allen thought the radiation in the belts is deadly but after he offered a NASA job he change his story.
That proves the moonlanding was a massive crime against humanity and to this day actively damages science and scientists.
This is why everyone human with a moral sense regardless of what he/she thinks of the so-called "moon landing" should come out and demand an investigation to clean the mess.As soon as possible before key witnesses have died.
@NASACrooks, What part of this statement don't you get?
A person in the cabin of a space shuttle ... at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week."
Van Allen wrote that in 2003. Does that sound like he no longer thought the belts were deadly? He never changed his mind--he qualified his earlier statements. The belts have ALWAYS been deadly for anyone planning to live in them.
@CNN911Fakes, the inner belt is more dense with high-energy protons.
If you want to know how Apollo navigated the VABs, watch this:
watch?v=z4gSRy1tHls
The lower belt dips to as low as 100 miles in a bump called the South Atlantic Anomaly, caused because the earth's magnetic core is off-center. The highest point of the lower belt would be near 650 miles. For a good diagram of this, search: "The abnormity of the radiation belts over the South Atlantic (SAA)"
Avoiding the questions, like you're avoiding backing up your retarded claims? I'm actually surprised people here are even falling for your monkey babbling and are still playing your game and providing evidence (that you quickly shrug off anyway). I wonder when was the actual last time you've made an educated claim, or have shown the tiniest semblance of evidence supporting it. It's a fact it never happened in this thread.
@GeneralSamov I don't even think he has a point anymore, his modus operandi is to simply disbelief everything that is said and ask stupid questions that anyone can look up.
I don't think he ever had a point, but yeah, he's pretty much turned into a parody of what he was about 1 month ago. Considering he was parody back then already, we're now left with a... parody of a parody?!?? Whoah.
Oh well...
I'm stuck with a valuable friend,
I'm happy, hope you're happy too.
One flash of light, but no smoking pistol.
(I'm afraid the sordid details have been disclosed already, though)
Why, the Dead sea scrolls obviously, coupled with the gospel according to Matthew and why not, even the book of Mormon thrown in for good measure. What you end up could best be described as something resembling a Vicki Bennet song...
@GeneralSamov I bet if he looks up the Apollo moon landings in the Britannica, suddenly the Britannica will have an 'agenda' and be part of the conspiracy.
NASA gypped Jarah White by selling him stuff guaranteed to be something it wasn't.
NASA hoax. Ongoing for over 40 years now. NASAcrooks gypping all of us.
nameofthepen 29 minutes ago
@nameofthepen NASA is probably making a fortune of this fake lunar dust.
mrwonderfulman2011 25 minutes ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 - Ye$. Authentic as bottled (tap) water.
nameofthepen 7 minutes ago
(sigh) Still educating folks in English; a never-ending task, apparently.
Scare quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase to indicate that it does not signify its literal or conventional meaning. - Wiki, Scare Quotes
Quotation marks can also be used to indicate a different meaning of a word or phrase than the one typically associated with it and are often used to express irony. - Wiki, Quotation Mark
nameofthepen 54 minutes ago
@nameofthepen Good. So Jarrah used soil that was unlike lunar soil to show that NASA never went to the moon?
Doesn't really make much sense either way.
krisdevalle 47 minutes ago
@krisdevalle Either way, the product was manufactured from NASA themselves and they sent it to Jarrah to do a demonstration. Jarrah proved that no footprint could have been created using that product and therefore, NASA never went to the moon. Simple stuff Kris!
mrwonderfulman2011 26 minutes ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrdreadfultard2011
Hmm... indeed! Flawless logic. Kind of like when you need to go to the nearby village you will obviously choose to go by plane. Apart from the fact you'll first need to travel to the airport (which is probably farther away than the village), then fly to another airport (God only knows where that one is), and then get from the second airport to the village you set out to go to. Indeed, the logic behind is impeccable. Impeccable as in retarded.
GeneralSamov 5 minutes ago
Hey lander fucktards. The moon mission's were giant failures.. Suck it up like at least a one nut man would do.. But the good news is that you get another chance by voting for Newt!!! He's going to get a city going on up there. Shit hot damn!!!!!
drummerbadass1 1 hour ago
I always wanted to believe that NASA went to the moon, but they didn't and that's too bad! Why wouldn't anyone really want to believe that NASA went the moon? That's not what this forum is about and that's what I try to address. Why not question its reality? These shills get so worked up when anyone shows any disbelief or when an experiment shows any little bit of proof toward a hoax, the shills get so personal like they have something to hide?
mrwonderfulman2011 1 hour ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 You seem a little worked up.
krisdevalle 1 hour ago
@krisdevalle So do you meathead! You have said nothing but attacks and insults toward anyone who questions the moon landing. Speak for yourself Kris!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 hour ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 It seems like they trying to help perpetuate the NASA moonlanding myth.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 hour ago
Just because bedroom experiments may have turned out badly for some people doesn't mean that Jarrah's *scientific* one wasn't valid. Apollo hoax! ;-)
nameofthepen 2 hours ago
@nameofthepen What makes it rather amusing is that you feel that he used accurate lunar simulant to prove NASA never went to the moon, thus rendering the lunar simulant inaccurate.
So if they never went, what is the simulant simulating?
None of you turkeys seem to be able to answer that simple question.
krisdevalle 1 hour ago
@krisdevalle You replied to the wrong person genius
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 hour ago
@nameofthepen I think Kris is need of a diaper change he's so full of shit!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 hour ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 He is full of himself. Same thing. lol!!!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 hour ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 - Jarrah bought his "simulated lunar soil" from NASA.
nameofthepen 1 hour ago
@nameofthepen Do go on. How did NASA know what to simulate?
krisdevalle 1 hour ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nameofthepenis/mrdreadfultard2011
You're now posing questions to yourself and answering your own questions on the air? Are you absolutely certain you're not starting to develop schizophrenia?
GeneralSamov 58 minutes ago
This video was recorded in a studio NOT on the Moon.They never really walked on the Moon.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
neil armstrong
LaughaLot013 2 hours ago
It's too predictable of a video from my point of view. If these men really travelled all the way to the moon, you would certainly think they would be worried or would show some uncertainty in their voices. They didn't because they had nothing to worry about. Wink Wink! :)
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011
So they spent billions of dollars (and even if you believe its fake they spent billions of dollars making the saturn V's etc) but because the people behind the "Hoax" neglected to tell these actors to sound worried, that's proof that it's faked.
I've never noticed any astronaut's sounding worried as it happens... I suppose the international space station is also fake because the astronauts on it don't sound worried either....
Seriously get a brain.
paulosio 1 hour ago
@paulosio Watch the Jarrah White video that shows how Aldrin's footprints were not possible to make! That's not too hard to watch even for you. If you can't understand it, I can explain it to you and to Kris. You both seem a little slow!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 hour ago
@paulosio You have no brain. If you did you would know buy now that the International Space Station is only 150 miles off the ground. The Moon is way out 230,000 Miles AWAY!!! lol Do you have any understanding of the difference?
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 hour ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer by*
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 hour ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aeronauticalexplorer
You are not supposed to randomly bang on keyboards. Get back to your group and eat some bananas or something.
GeneralSamov 55 minutes ago
this should definitely have the most views on youtube.
EhHolepro 2 hours ago
If you just forget the whole space race and all this hoax nonsense and just see it as a couple human beings on the moon, it sends shivers down my spine to think they were the only people on it at that time and now it has been left empty for years and years. I wish I could go there one day..
GroockG 6 hours ago
Please can one of the hoax people answer me this... We all know that Neil Armstrong said "One small step for man" when he meant to say "...for A man".
"for man" and "for mankind" actually mean the same thing (although it was obvious what he meant).
So if this was all just a "movie", he messed up the most important line of the most important scene. So why the hell didn't they re-shoot it???
TheBaldmeister 7 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheBaldmeister
I now expect one of the tards to come up and say Neil's mistake was intentional, so that when the hoaxtards would eventually crawl out from under their rocks and claim it was faked NASA could say just what you did, "why did we not re-shoot it then?"
GeneralSamov 5 hours ago
@TheBaldmeister You know something; I really question the moon landing for many reasons. I also wonder a lot about the preparation of the dialogue too. It's as if the astronauts had a script planned before they left the planet. I mean, there was nothing strange about their voices from the time they stepped on to the moon "One small step for man ..." from the time they departed "What a ride, what a ride." In my opinion, the script was planned well ahead. Drama at its best! :)
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 After questioning the validity of the NASA claim and researching and examining all the evidence against them, anyone with any common sense can see that they whole thing was Bull Shit.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer If you watch that Jarrah White video about making footprints in the lunar soil, he completely deflates the Mythbusters demo and shows how they're a bunch of idiots that are in bed with NASA and manipulate an experiment to the point where they find the results they were hoping to find. They can't even do any experiment properly whereas White shows how moisture would be needed otherwise the dust collapses in on itself. The Buzz Aldrin little boy footprint is a complete joke!
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 I know. The Mythbusters always have a predetermind outcome with the NASA experiments. Did you see the one they did with the Wire support and slow motion video? They called it "Busted" but never did the slow motion with the wire support On. The did them seperate. So Jarrah White took the video of the Mythbuster Jamie on the wire and Slowed it down and PRESTO instant NASA video Astronot jump. Exactly the same as the NASA video. Slow Motion AND the wire support is what NASA used
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Yeah but we could see the wire there.
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle So your theory is that if don't see it, it is not there? You crack me up with your stupidity. You remind be of a dumb blonde headed bimbo. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Don't forget with a really bad hat!
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
"One small step for man , One giant dick in Russias mouth"-the was most Americans see this event .
crysisidiol999 7 hours ago
Just knowing that we are little beings on a large ball floating in an unimaginably vast space makes me wonder why everything is the way it is. That is when I found a website called Truth Contest. You can search it in google and click on the top result. Then read "The Present" on the homepage.
bedtheater 8 hours ago
ooo they doing the moonwalk!!
Mr1cam43 10 hours ago
See comments on my channel. The man, never on the moon! I'm author of estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
MegaLogaritmo 17 hours ago
@MegaLogaritmo
Hey Ufologo !
COMMOGSE 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MegaLogaritmo
The man, never on the moon! Please visit goatse. info/ for more ... info. Thanks!
GeneralSamov 15 hours ago
Just take a look at the Apollo 11 crew,and tell me again how these 3 retarded sons of whores could have possibly been to the moon.What a laugh!
NASACrooks 20 hours ago
@NASACrooks : Not hard to believe when considering you were able to log on to your computer and find the correct keys while typing.
JDQuantum 13 hours ago
@NASACrooks - maybe they were also driving the "space shuttle"?
Totally LMAO at this "space shuttle footage": /watch?v=fi17lrcvPi4
nameofthepen 11 hours ago
Its the little things that give it away !
LOL
COMMOGSE 21 hours ago
At least the world is slowly catching on and questioning the reality of the so called moon landing. The answers will come forward eventually in the future.
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
Actually Buzz tripped over some lighting cords during the first take and sprained his ankle so my Great Uncle filled in as his stunt double
XRACER113 1 day ago
I wonder if Neil and Buzz fought to get out first lmao its not like the moon was acid they act all scared.
chucky493 1 day ago
Got a new thread for the shills...
What was the command module air pressure (and what, besides 60% oxygen did it consist of) and what was the humidity?
ps, the shills have already said the 40% was an unknown inert gas meaning the humidity was 0, but let's see what falls out here.
CNN911Fakes 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CornFlakes
How about you stop pulling questions out of your ass in the hope you're going to catch an eventual fault by one of us, when it's obvious we're not making them (since we're telling the truth), and since you only end up ridiculing yourself further? I mean, "dust snows gently onto the Moon" what the flying fuck? How high do you have to be to write something like that? What are you on to even think up such nonsense? And especially, where can I get some of that?
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
@CNN911Fakes - Oh, boy! Just in time for the week-end. ;-))
nameofthepen 1 day ago
@nameofthepen I no longer put any trust or any real value in the Mythbusters demonstrations from now on. They clearly manipulate their experiments to the point where they get the results they want to find. These so called "shills" put so much priority in the Mythbusters' demonstrations when they're not even doing their experiments properly. I think there's a scientific word for it all? Oh yeah, it's called experimental bias!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 - Agree. There's something a little too cheesy about Mythbusters. But, they do fool a lot of people who aren't paying attention.
nameofthepen 1 day ago
@nameofthepen Yeh, let the fake shills start!
Hey, what kind of work do you do? Oh, I am a part-time weekend replacement shill for the full time shills' off days. Great pay, but I feel so dirty afterwards. Like Pilate and Hamlet's mom, I sometimes think I will never get clean.
Anyway, the focus of the question is the relative humidity of the command module. Should be zero.
CNN911Fakes 1 day ago
@CNN911Fakes - an anesthesiologist is what they need now. ;-)
nameofthepen 1 day ago
Neil is transparent!
ulaghchi 1 day ago
Dear shills:
The primary source of the dust is the cosmos. The time period is billions of years. Like a gentle snow with no wind, the dust falls evenly and covers everything evenly. There will be some variation near the edges of steep inclines whose angles are such that the lunar gravity and momentum are stonger than the frictional force stopping the dust.
Because there is no erosive force or other disturbance, where a bit of dust stops, it stays. Falls evenly, stays even. Simple blow hard
CNN911Fakes 1 day ago
@CNN911Fakes .
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
norjop 1 day ago
@CornFlakes
And there I was thinking you couldn't get any more high. I stand corrected.
Seriously, like sand on th Earth is just fine grains of stone, the same applies to regolith. As we all know, there's no snow in space, and much less does it snow lunar dust. Rather, there are numberless micrometeorites flying around at crazy speeds and wreaking havoc wherever they can. They quickly burn up in Earth's atmosphere, but easily reach the ground on the Moon, "eroding" the surface.
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
@GeneralSweetie sez: "...there are numberless micrometeorites flying around at crazy speeds, and wreaking havoc wherever they can."
But they never hit one single Astro-NOT or spaceship? (facepalm)
nameofthepen 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nameofthepen
Pretty sure some might have hit them, but one thing is exposure through billions of years (like your associate) stated, a wholly another 3 measly hours. Also, the suits were designed to withstand impacts up to a certain degree.
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nameofthepenis
Which part of "associate" did you fail to understand?
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
@GeneralSamov More shill science.
They call them "micro" because they are really small. They fall evenly across the real lunar surface, making very little difference to the overall thickness of the real lunar dust. Like the solar protons, they hit in all directions, there being no atmosphere, including nearly parallel to the real lunar surface
The micrometeors are another proof that no one went to the moon; they are random, constant and penetrating. There is no safe time period on the moon
CNN911Fakes 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CornFlakes
Sure. Like I said, the candy selling pirate unicorn has a discount today.
In the real world and in the real universe, little is uniform. If it were, then we wouldn't have mountains and valleys, and the Moon wouldn't be scattered with craters all over its surface (it would be all just one big crater uniformly deep throughout the whole lunar surface). Once again you show just how poor thought out you moontard shill claims are.
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
@GeneralSamov YT correctly marked your message as spam.
Really, how stupid can a shill be.
-you are horribly underpaid
-your English is often beyond understanding
-you know nothng about the universe or even our own solar system.
--atmosphere blocks and reflects light
--The only place in our solar system with living creatures is our earth
--the moon has no erosion - the hole a meteor makes is not erosion. We have mountains and valleys because we are violently different from the moon.
CNN911Fakes 21 hours ago
@KennyTwo
Hey Abraham !
What are the effects of the moon on earth ?
What are the effects of earth (6 times larger) on the moon ?
What do you think ?
COMMOGSE 21 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CornFlakes
U MAD?
Apart from the last point you've posted nothing put butthurt accusations, because obviously you've got nothing to counter my points but you were still trying to save face (which, I should add, was a vain attempt). As for your last point lucky that I used quotation marks, because I obviously know erosion isn't the proper term, but it's close enough, point in case you understood perfectly what I meant.
So yep, u mad... and my points still stand undisputed.
GeneralSamov 17 hours ago
@CNN911Fakes Are you sure about that? After all, most of the information you have about conditions on the moon comes from NASA.
krisdevalle 15 hours ago
@krisdevalle Really? please give us a list of those things we know about the moon that came only from NASA.
Fact is, most of what we know about the moon predates NASA's creation as a fakery factory.
CNN911Fakes 15 hours ago
@CNN911Fakes Really? What other countries sent unmanned probes to the moon to investigate the lunar environment?
krisdevalle 14 hours ago
@krisdevalle Perhaps he thinks "The Mouse On The Moon" was a documentary. :)
I remember NASA arranged the seismograph on the moons surface so that they could use the LEM's boost stage as a signal source. They discovered, that under the surface rock, the moon is made of a very hard sort of green cheese.
The "wrapper" layer is made out of light elements almost exclusively. This helped to explain a lot of things like why it doesn't look like green cheese.
knowledgemonger 13 hours ago
@krisdevalle I see you decided against providing a list opf those things we know about the moon that came only from NASA.
Why am I not surprised?
CNN911Fakes 7 hours ago
@CNN911Fakes Why should I?
I asked you where you got your knowledge of the moon from. You appear to be very skeptical of many information sources, so I wish to know which ones you trust?
krisdevalle 4 hours ago
@krisdevalle I don't trust a word you say Kris. The Jarrah White video is highly reliable from my point of view; however, you see it as a complete flaw, but I really don't think you took any time to watch it. What don't you like about the video Kris? Are you really that daffy? Maybe wearing that hat for too long has finally got to you? ): Poor Kris!
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 He even admitted that he will not watch a Jarrah White video because he doesn't like Jarrah's his voice. Meanwhile Kris probably sounds the same. They are both from Australia.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer We really don't even know if that picture is Kris? That hat is too much for anyone to brag about.
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 If I ever saw him in a Bar or a Pub wearing that hat, I would smack it right off his head and when he goes to pick it up, I would step on it and hold it down with my foot.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer He's just a Croc Dundee wanabee! He's not half the man Dundee is anyway? No one would be dumb enough to believe in the moon landing.
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Wow you guys are so angry. Jarrah White is all 'argh help I'm being stalked' and then we have you guys threatening to strike me if you saw me.
Good work, kids.
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle Say what you want Kris, but it doesn't make you any more convincing.
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 I can't believe you think the moon landings were fake because you think Neil or Buzz should have been more terrified.
These guys were test pilots you moron. Trained to keep cool under any circumstance.
Good god you are dim.
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle "These guys were test pilots ..." The perfect selection to cover it all up then? If questions concerning their safety ever came about, we would just direct people back to the answer ... they were test pilots! Born with the ability to "keep cool" and afraid of nothing! Yeah, that's brilliant Kris! You'll have to do a lot better than that Handsome! :)
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 I feel confident that your disbelief is far from what is required to prove to the world that this was a hoax.
Argue the facts all you like, lady. Won't change them.
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle You can argue the fact that it was faked all you like. It will never make it real.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011
Gagarin didn't sound worried either and he was the 1st man in space... .Or do you believe that was faked too?
paulosio 1 hour ago
@paulosio HA HA ha ha. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the truth came out about Gagarin. They admitted He was NOT the 1st man in space. Get a clue kid.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 hour ago
@krisdevalle You forgot about also stepping on your hat while it is on the floor. lol!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer I'm so scared!
youtube threats! Whatever shall I do!
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle What threat?
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle Kris, you're full of sour onions and need a diaper change! The Jarrah White video showed how deep Aldrin dug his boot into the soil whereas the Mythbusters never went down more than a millimetre. When a boot is dug into the dry soil without any water vapour (moisture) the dust collapses in on itself kris! This is not too difficult to understand?
mrwonderfulman2011 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 LOL they had foot prints on the moon but nothing from the Rocket lander! lol!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 Highly reliable? He performed his experiment in a bedroom.
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle The proof that they used wire supports to simulate 1:6 gravity is enough for anyone to understand that the whole thing was faked. They never walked on the Moon. It has been proven already. Get over it.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@CNN911Fakes - Similar to so many other gems from GeneralSweetie.
"The number of stars isn't infinite... If it were, you'd always see a white sky, regardless of daytime or nighttime. There just wouldn't be any "void" in between the stars." - GeneralSamov, 1 month ago
nameofthepen 12 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nameofthepenis
Indeed, that's what I said. Of course monkeys like you or CornFlakes can't understand this fact, but proper scientists do. In fact, what I said is called the Olbers' paradox. You should look it up.
GeneralSamov 11 hours ago
@CNN911Fakes Where did you get this information?
krisdevalle 1 day ago
@krisdevalle John 3:16
CNN911Fakes 1 day ago
@CNN911Fakes Not a very well peer-reviewed source.
krisdevalle 23 hours ago
@krisdevalle Kris, do you really get paid for being on here covering up the fake moon landing? They must not pay you much eh? If they did, you would certainly afford a better looking hat at least. :)
mrwonderfulman2011 22 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 No. Why do you think you people would be important enough for NASA to pay someone to deal with your ridiculous ideas?
It's youtube, buddy. Full of kooks mucking around.
krisdevalle 22 hours ago
@krisdevalle You certainly invest quite a bit of time on here though? Just curious that's all? In any case, no one wants to believe the moon landing was a complete fake, but it was Kris! Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
mrwonderfulman2011 22 hours ago
@mrfulofshitman
Thats the spirit we want !
Glad you made it out of hiding !
COMMOGSE 22 hours ago
@mrfulofshitman
Good morning Chuck !
Any new bullshit today ?
COMMOGSE 22 hours ago
@COMMOGSE Any new bullshit? Well, just what's inside your head, but then again, that was always there. :)
mrwonderfulman2011 22 hours ago
@CornFlakes
Besides, I seem to recall you said you believe in God. So, don't you also believe in the bible? Because according to the bible the world is only 6000 years old or so. Not billions of years what is this I don't even
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
I think the moon landing was real. That's my opinion.
avpkid345 1 day ago
@avpkid345 - Your channel rocks, dude. :-)
nameofthepen 1 day ago
nasa stoled the plan from jugoslavia
mackocacko2 1 day ago
The man, never on the moon!
See estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
MegaLogaritmo 1 day ago
@MegaLogaritmo, the website is virtually useless. First, most of us don't speak Portuguese. Second, the website isn't even complete! The "Sobre nos" page gives no information about who created the website. If this is important astrophysical information, you have more work to do to tell the world!
LunarTuner 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LunarTuner; resumo, só para ti ( estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt ): in the center of stars, planets and moons, there is a type of antimatter that repels everything as like poles of magnets, but in enormous proportions, much more repelling herself when separated, and this cause the shape of the ellipsoids orbits of moons and planets. Also repels the magma within a certain distance, where it forms a repulsive barrier compressed by the magma. AMC(man on the moon:NASA lie!)
MegaLogaritmo 1 day ago
See estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
The man, never on the moon!
RitmoMegaLogo 1 day ago
See estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
MegaLogaritmo 1 day ago
@MegaLogaritmo
Hey Ufologo !
COMMOGSE 1 day ago
@COMMOGSE : yes, and astrophysicist / cosmologist author of estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
The man, never on the moon!
MegaLogaritmo 1 day ago
@MegaLogaritmo
You forgot bullshitist , retardist and talkshitist !
COMMOGSE 1 day ago
@COMMOGSE : não, isso é porque estás observando um espelho. Também pudera, tem tanto idiota neste planeta que aqui, no You Tube, tais não se ausentariam, mesmo. Xingar, todos podem aqui. Divulgar uma das maiores descobertas da astrofísica contemporânea, isso é para poucos. See estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
MegaLogaritmo 1 day ago
@MegaLogaritmo
Falador !
COMMOGSE 1 day ago
No matter how many times I see this video, I gives me chills everytime. What a fantastic achievement for USA / mankind. And this was back in 1969!! unbelivable !. From a 'human' perspective, whan an experience must it have been, to lift off, travel further and faster than anyone else on the history of your planet, on a minute tin-foil capsule and then land on our moon. Wow...I'm speechless.
Aramis7 1 day ago
sorda corolla
NASACrooks 1 day ago
@NASACrooks - ¡Viva sorda corolla! ;-)
nameofthepen 23 hours ago
@nameofthepen What information do we have on COMMOGSE? Is she another paid shill?
mrwonderfulman2011 21 hours ago
@mrfulofshitman
Where have i heard that sentence before ?
It sounds familiar !
COMMOGSE 21 hours ago
@mrfulofshitman
Sometimes i get the feeling i was talking to an old friend.
You know what i mean ?
COMMOGSE 21 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 - I'd say at least as real as the Astro-NOTs. ;-)
nameofthepen 12 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In scenes from the first step in "moon", the horizon is too close, in scenes without distortion, where the camera is on height of helmet of the ACTOR! Read the comments on my channel. The man was never on the moon! I am the author of estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
RitmoMegaLogo 1 day ago
Doctor Who brought me here :)
NatalieCondliffe 1 day ago
How is possible to still belive in moon landing today???
John D. Rockefeller was right: "I don't want a nation of thinkers. I want a nation of workers!"
The method: .youtube.com/watch?v=hvGEfEG0H7c&feature=share&mid=56563
testerics 1 day ago
i wish people would stop using methods to try to debunk that this is fake bs and just use their common sense. this shit never happened. this 2012 and people are still gullible enough to believe this crap. conspiracies do exist people. theres millions of people that still think a plane hit the pentagon when it's in no way possible. believing everything your govt. tells you is nothing more than blind patriotism. i hope one day to see people with brains in this country.
DecayedOfferings 1 day ago
@DecayedOfferings, there are ~ 20,000 photos of Apollo's 9 missions; 100 hrs of video; 842 lbs. of samples free to any geologist in the world who requests them; retroreflectors on the moon detected by observatories in many countries & Apollo was the only thing launched to get those there; independent tracking by USSR & UK; Indy photos of Apollo 8's TLI burn; Millions of documents; Millions watched launches.
Why listen to you instead of astronomers, physicists and geologists?
LunarTuner 1 day ago
@LunarTuner you come at me with the same old shit that people have already debunked.
DecayedOfferings 1 day ago
@DecayedOfferings, Oh, they convinced you it was debunked? I assume they were well-qualified--more qualified than the PhD scientists who designed your computer, your airliner, your phone, your TV and the satellite that gives you communications? I challenge you to find ONE of those PhD scientists who believes the evidence of the Apollo program has been "debunked."
LunarTuner 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@krisdevalle
Why, the Dead sea scrolls obviously, coupled with the gospel according to Matthew and why not, even the book of Mormon thrown in for good measure. What you end up could best be described as something resembling a Vicki Bennet song...
(warning: retainment of mental sanity is not guaranteed - handle with care /watch?v=DT8dW9DF5TU)
GeneralSamov 2 days ago
If he was the first man on the moon, how did they get the camera out there?
Gothgrl102 2 days ago
@Gothgrl102 Smarter people than you figured it out.
krisdevalle 2 days ago
@Gothgrl102 there was a camera on the outside of the ship
Amychelle14 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ashes to ashes, funk to funky
We all know CornFlakes' a junky
Strung up in heaven's high, hitting an all time low...
GeneralSamov 2 days ago
Comment removed
GeneralSamov 2 days ago
Gingrich says, vote for me and the US are on the Moon in 2020, hah....they would have to fake it, just as they did after Kennedy's foolish claims.
kennjohnsen 2 days ago
in the words of PhillyD: one small step for man, one giant Dick in Russia's Mouth
blibblab1001 2 days ago
This video was recorded in a studio. They never really walked on the Moon.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 days ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer, Joseph Goebbels said, "“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
Is it your plan to just repeat your own personal opinion over and over and over until people believe it? Good luck with that. May I suggest that you show us evidence of this studio, tell us where it is, offer testimony from someone who saw it or photos or documentation of it. That might work better for you.
LunarTuner 1 day ago
Before you reply again. that list of changes were of the cuff knowledge. when you can think w/o wiki references come see me. I'm not here to give you comments on your video, so you might need to find another source of income.
eatmyassclean 2 days ago
What is "plane" stupid anyway? A level above "train" stupid, perhaps? I wonder where "ship" stupid belongs then...
GeneralSamov 2 days ago
This video was recorded in a studio. NOT on the Moon you damn fools.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 days ago
Kiss my (_l_)
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 days ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Boy you really showed him.
krisdevalle 2 days ago
LISTEN UP THIS VIDEO IS A SYMBOL OF THE AMERICAN DREAM
SO WHAT IF ITS FAKE
SO WHAT IF THE GOVERNMENT ITS CORRUPT
IT IS A MAN STANDING ON THE FUCKING MOON
darkrapter125 2 days ago
@darkrapter125 Stop screaming I have a hangover.
eatmyassclean 2 days ago
so fake, nobody has ever set foot on the moon. But with hollywood technology everything becomes possible on a tv screen
UpInUrAss 2 days ago
This video was recorded in a studio. They never really walked on the Moon. Anyone who believes they did is gullible.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 days ago
LMAO at the comments here. Shit guys stop beating each other up. 'The Earth's atmosphere does not suddenly end at a particular altitude and space begins. In fact, the Earth's atmosphere continues out for more than 1,000 miles into space.'
fas . org/spp/military/docops/army/ref_text/chap5im . htm
eatmyassclean 2 days ago
James A. Van Allen is one overrated man. He said hey guys can you put a Geiger counter on that rocket? Shit, if they offered me a boss ass job, a kick ass paycheck and promised to make my name infamous, I'd probably say whatever they wanted too. Shit the guy that first came up with the idea to put something between you ass and a horse wasn't named blanket or saddle, was he
eatmyassclean 2 days ago
Yeah, we went to the moon, yeah, NASA faked some shit, figure it out, it still won't change shit.
eatmyassclean 2 days ago
fake and gay
camiispacepilot 2 days ago
First,Van Allen thought the radiation in the belts is deadly but after he offered a NASA job he change his story.
That proves the moonlanding was a massive crime against humanity and to this day actively damages science and scientists.
This is why everyone human with a moral sense regardless of what he/she thinks of the so-called "moon landing" should come out and demand an investigation to clean the mess.As soon as possible before key witnesses have died.
NASACrooks 2 days ago
@NASACrooks
First,Van Allen "thought" !
The end !
LOL
COMMOGSE 2 days ago
@NASACrooks, What part of this statement don't you get?
A person in the cabin of a space shuttle ... at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week."
Van Allen wrote that in 2003. Does that sound like he no longer thought the belts were deadly? He never changed his mind--he qualified his earlier statements. The belts have ALWAYS been deadly for anyone planning to live in them.
LunarTuner 2 days ago
@LunarTuner Would 1000 miles be the lower or upper belt?
And, again, what kind of radiation was it in the lower belts that was so much more penetrating?
CNN911Fakes 2 days ago
@CNN911Fakes, the inner belt is more dense with high-energy protons.
If you want to know how Apollo navigated the VABs, watch this:
watch?v=z4gSRy1tHls
The lower belt dips to as low as 100 miles in a bump called the South Atlantic Anomaly, caused because the earth's magnetic core is off-center. The highest point of the lower belt would be near 650 miles. For a good diagram of this, search: "The abnormity of the radiation belts over the South Atlantic (SAA)"
LunarTuner 2 days ago
@LunarTuner Col, how shillish. In your response to my comment, you avoided all 3 of my questions.
Feel free to try again or, as is common among your kind, keep avoiding the questions.
CNN911Fakes 2 days ago
@CNN911Fakes You could probably have looked it up for yourself.
What's the matter? Too hard?
krisdevalle 2 days ago
@CornFlakes
Avoiding the questions, like you're avoiding backing up your retarded claims? I'm actually surprised people here are even falling for your monkey babbling and are still playing your game and providing evidence (that you quickly shrug off anyway). I wonder when was the actual last time you've made an educated claim, or have shown the tiniest semblance of evidence supporting it. It's a fact it never happened in this thread.
Oh well, at least you bring comic relief.
GeneralSamov 2 days ago
@GeneralSamov I don't even think he has a point anymore, his modus operandi is to simply disbelief everything that is said and ask stupid questions that anyone can look up.
He's devolved into farce.
krisdevalle 2 days ago
@krisdevalle
I don't think he ever had a point, but yeah, he's pretty much turned into a parody of what he was about 1 month ago. Considering he was parody back then already, we're now left with a... parody of a parody?!?? Whoah.
Oh well...
I'm stuck with a valuable friend,
I'm happy, hope you're happy too.
One flash of light, but no smoking pistol.
(I'm afraid the sordid details have been disclosed already, though)
GeneralSamov 2 days ago
@GeneralSamov What I am particularly amused by is that he has now stated he doesn't believe any sources of information.
I used NASA data; he said since he thought NASA lied, he can't trust them.
Then he said he only used NASA data.
Then he decided that wikipedia had an agenda, so none of their information can be trusted either.
Where's he going to go next? Microsoft Encarta? God forbid... the library?
krisdevalle 2 days ago
@krisdevalle
Why, the Dead sea scrolls obviously, coupled with the gospel according to Matthew and why not, even the book of Mormon thrown in for good measure. What you end up could best be described as something resembling a Vicki Bennet song...
GeneralSamov 2 days ago
@GeneralSamov I bet if he looks up the Apollo moon landings in the Britannica, suddenly the Britannica will have an 'agenda' and be part of the conspiracy.
krisdevalle 2 days ago