every one hates but my 04 cammed 3800 would put most your cars the shame,,even though its not really a sports car this one is about 800 pounds more and not really the fastest car but its a beast and will last forever if looked after
Needless to say, but the 2012 impala that is coming out is going to be much better. Chevrolet is not going to redesign the Impala at all, however they are giving it entire new drive train that give's you six gears & pumps out 320 HorsePower from a new engine! Yet it still get's 30+ mpg on highway with those 320 horses on board.
why do y'all jack ass wanna go so damn fast and kill one another? an impala is one of the best cars out their they last a long time and maybe more in bed then some of yall jack ass smh crash dummys these days
0-60 in 10 seconds.. not bad.. But agreed. This would not be the best vehicle for a race. The 95-98 Buick park avenues aren't that bad thoguh. 0-100 in 10 seconds.
dont be stupid the governor stops it at 107 i deactivated mine and hit 140 but my car was a 9 sec 0*60 remove the gorvernor and ur time decreases about a sec and depends how u drive it too?
actually, i was just racing a mustang yesterday in my 01 chevy impala LS (mustang was an 08 or 09) and i owned the crap outta his car, got me up to 120 easily...i did rebuild the engine and made small modifications but nothing that would seriously bosst me
@BLG4real Dude, All you need to do is to buy an ex police Impala which comes with all kinds of shit that makes it go fast. I used to do 0-60 in 7 seconds with mine even though it had 300K miles on it.
@BLG4real Is it an ex squad car? Did you add any mods to it? I know the new SS can do 5.5 but the 6 cylinders they're running now are the LTZ which does about 7.5 seconds and the police supposedly does 6.8 seconds.
@deltaboy767 You're 4 speed automatic getting 30+ mpg doesn't make it any less shitty that you only have 4 gears. It's also a matter of 5-6 speeds being quicker and more fun to drive.
And second, the 2010 Impala is only rated for 29 mpg, and thats highway. It gets 18 mpg in the city, which is pretty damn shitty. Where's your 4 speed now?
And seriously. 211 hp out of a 3.5 liter v6? Every other not shitty company's 3.5 v6 would make 270+ hp.
people that talk shit about this vid must be intimidated because If you never like this car/upload, then why in the fuck are you wasting your life going to this vid in the 1st place??? Where's the logic in this stupidity? Moronic individuals!
Will you fags stop arguing. Don't get an impala if you wan't speed. Get one if you wan't RELIABILITY and handling. And yes they are excellent cars nomatter what you douchebags say. And yes 112 miles an hour is plenty fast for you jackasses.
@stevenmorookian16 The most reliable car ever!! Don't forget: GET A White Impala and everyone will get out of your way especially if you drive with the headlights on. I never got cut off when I drove my white Impala.
The compass is above the ambient temperature readout. (86°F) In this video it says "CAL", meaning it was in calibration mode for some reason. The engine temp gauge is on the far right side of the screen. Next to that is the fuel gauge which is off-camera.
Every sinlge chevy is the same on the inside that shows creativity. and who puts crank windows in a brand new car for 10,000? Not honda or any import. ONLY CHEVY. Who puts a big V-8 on a FWD car, only chevy. The last time I checked, HONDA is still in business pontiac onwers.
@20044runner Yea GM geared these way to high but they did that for fuel economy not for speed. I say that if they wanted it to be fast they would have made it to be fast. But that's just me. That's why they have cars like the Camaro and Vette!
@wow0yunnies GM has horrible fuel econoy, really? Humm I know your WRONG, cause the Impala is rated at 30+ MPG with a four speed automatic, other makers have to use a 5 or 6 speed to get the same results, so get your facts together before you speek.
@wow0yunnies Excue me, I own a 2010 impala, and i'll scann the god damm window sticker, and show your ass, NOW WHAT!!! and Chevy,com gives the epa of 30 MPG on the LT model with the 3.5 V6. So again you need to shut your hole before you speak.
lets be real here a civic si 2 liter is fater then your impala a rsx 2.0 liter is faster then your impala a acura tl 3.2 270hp is faster then your car by far. the only thing smokin would be your engine. the 3.9 is coarse and unrefined. poor engineering 3.9 liters 233hp? hondas 2 liter engine makes 240 where you at? u cant see honda fool
@rob16875 LMFAO! YOUR FUNNY ! AHAAHAHAA ! YEAHHH RITE ! AN IMPALA MORE LUXURIOUS THEN A HONDA OR TOYOTA ? OKAYY BUDDY ! KEEP DREAMING ! REMBR ACURA AND LEXUS ! ? TEHEHE LMAO!
ROFL, that is the funiest shit i have ever heard. my honda/acura is by far better then any chevy n the road and also 5 star crash rating on all of our cars, not tomention worth the most for resale and depreciates the least of allcars onthe market. i got a 3.2 and willsmoke your 3.5 , 3.9 and your 5.3 liter engines. in my 3.2. please dont ever talk shit.
a ricer? i drive a Acura TL A-SPEC. 3.2 liter V6 with over 300HP with bolt on's out of a 3.2 liter engine. this car sucks. u suck and nobody likes you. i dont like you. your parents dont like you. impala is a disgrace engine is coarse. i could run faster then thing goes. u have bigger engine and yet you would get smoked in a race. v6 on v6
dont get mad, your car sucks, your engine sucks, and chevy sucks. how am i a rcier when i drive a 3.2 liter v6 that would smoke your car which is a 3.9 liter? acura is better then a impala in so many ways its not even funny.how much money u willing to put on a race between your shitty car and my Acura. bottom line is your just another dumb american who thinks chevy is patriotic when in fact your car was built in canada or mexico and my acura built in ohio. fuck your chevy POS. anyday ,anytime
lol do i sound mad? your just rambling on about some dumb honda you have and about how it can beat everybody blah blah blah, what a crock. Your just another ricer wishing his car was anything but slow, and again i dont have an impala or a 3.9, ive got a 3.4 monte carlo
r u serious? LMAO 1st the impala is a poormans buick. my acura is 3.2 liter spushing 270 stock. yours is 3.9 233hp? lame. bottomline is this my car is better crash rating,. worth x2 as much as yours better interior more power better engine more efficient and the inside doesnt looklike it was made frmo a dollar generalstore. stfu noob
2006 tl-APSEC stock ran 14.17 modded now cai, full quad exhaust, TB Spacer, j pipe stock is 270 HP imabout 300 or 305@crank. imnoty saying the impalais a terrible car. but in comaprison inmany reports its not as good as the TL. impala= 2.5 stars out of 5
You are comparing a luxury car to a chevy, a six speed to a four speed auto, $35,000 to $24,000. This car also weighs 300lbs more than your TL. The TL is more like the Lacrosse in comparison.
alright man seriously lets thinkabout this. acura makes a 3.5 liter type -s with 286 and the auto runs 14.0 flat. u have a 5.3 liter V8 only producing 303hp. 4 speed automatic is gm's fault for being dumb as always. im not saying these are badcars however in all honesty they are dept. of the treasury cars. the new rl is v8 powered by a v8 4.4 liter 420hp. chevy is a budget car like a dodge or ford.
My father has a 2004 TL auto and I have drove it before. Back in 05 I had it for a couple days and raced some cars with it. I schooled a scion tc that had cai and custom exhaust. I also took a 2004 civic si. Then I raced my friends 2004 regal gs. All it has is a cai and a performance muffler. I thought for sure that I would win. At around 80mph the regal was a full car length ahead of me.
tl auto arent bad they are average. a regal is supercharged how dou ever come froced induction to a car that isnt? SC the tl and u got around 13.0 my car i keep up withj the new mustangs with 300HPi bet i run around a 13.6 or 13.7. i kill chargers any old mustang camaros are good for awhile subies from a roll noproblem frmo a dig they will kill alot ofcars.put that regall with me and i guarantee it willhave no shot. and thenthe type -s regal has no shot guaranteed.
The regal also had 18 inch wheels and a lot of wheel spin off the line. I mean The wheels spinned through most of 1st gear. The acura actually pulled ahead until around 50 ish. I remember this race well, because I only raced against 5 or 6 cars with the TL. This is the only car that I lost to.
btw
The rest of the cars that I raced were all modified pocket rockets.
this is bottom line acura is by far superior thenany american car. my nextcar will prolly be a merc cause its a high hp, rwd luxury car. and the AMG E55 runs about 12.3 stock in 1/4. thats ridiculious for a 4000lb car. mercedes and bmw are comparable with acura but different kind comparable. acura is more reliable but fwd is avg sometimes, i like rwd and fwd. not a fan of awd as much.
@cadillac is average in comparison to european and japanese luxury cars. cadillac makes descent power but takes alot of dispalcement and a supercharger to produce500HP other automakers us a n/a engine which is usually better but mercedes makes gret engines also. i wont drive gm dodge or fo9rd they are dept of treasury cars owned by obama and congress. no thanks obama works for bankers anyways passing more taxes on this country and mccain and hillary and the bushs they are all the same
gm=fail=bankrupt=cause nobody buys theirjunk= us dept of treasury car is it american ro buy a chevy built in another country? aT LEAST MY ACURA IS BUILT IN OHIO UNLIKES YOUR SHIT BUILT IN CANADA ANDMEXICO DICKFACE look it up moron
we are talking bm and acura and you dont have either so why are you inthe convo? man shit the fuck up , bottom line, me and you in person face to face you would shake my hand and tuck tail. cause this dog hunts. believe it.
how is it american if it it built and or assembled in another country? cmonman, if gm is supposedly american why do their have subpar labor from canada and mexico doing their work? how is that american? butmaybe its american that that put a ugly ass bowtie emblem on the car no matter what parts or where it is built means it is american? thats dogshit and u know it. thats about american as our president saying he is for the people, when we all know he is for the bankers. cmon man think..
If GM wasn't bailed out the unemployment rate would be way higher. There would of been a shit load of companies closing. There would have been a domino effect. I am an independent and did not vote for Obama and I do not like his administration one little bit.
btw Why does it matter if your tl and the rdx are built in the USA? The rest of the acura cars are built in japan and canada.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ill race my acura vs impala malibu and your fuckin v8 POS 5.3 liter 303 hp and watch u lose whqt u think about dat buick fag your cars are out of date why should i buy out a gm when i dont drive their hidesous shit
If we both drove these cars for the first time your bonneville..I'm sorry your TL would loose 8 out of 10 runs. My 85 regal t-type would school your car 10 out of 10 runs. It cost me $3,500 and I have put $5000 into it. It hits 60 in the low 4's and does the quarter mile in 12.57.
I saw your page looks like you got a lot of people haten your ricer ass. Maybe if you put some vtec decals on your over priced POS honda you will turn it into a 10 second car.
lmao acura is by far better then gm any day of the week the only reason ppl buy american is becuase it soooo american., fuck that i buy the better product. pounf dfor pound any motors liter for liter gm loses to imports
your comparing door hinges?? wow man. An acura TL type S would school the "SS like a bitch". If you wanna talk the sport edition of the impala why not the sport edition of the TL. There is no comparing the impala to the TL, the TL is an amazing car. period.
lmso, hilariosu typicla answer from a american who is ignorant. stupidity can be bought , u bought a chevy, see its easy isnt it? the bottom line is my car produces 270stock@ crank. with bolt ons the j32a motor repsonds well to boltons. your impala doesnt have a chance. your 5.3 v8 doesnt either. uhave to have a 5.7 or 6 liter to beat my car. im curious why isit that your v6's have such a hard time competing with import v6's? and your inline 4's to ours? dont worry we will build a V8 soon.
Man... Even your own mom hates your ugly face. I never have owned a Chevy in my my life. I have 3.0L V6 220HP Manual 1995 SHO and 5.3 L V8 303HP 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP. Eat my shit you rice boy.
So what is it that you own? Acura TL? Unless you have the type S you are not beating much. Even if you do, you're bragging about a large, heavy, family sedan. You don't have any videos backing up any of your claims either. I happen to drive a Chevy. 2.0l turbo producing 260bhp. All stock. 0-60 anywhere between 5.5 and 6 seconds depending on road conditions and traction. I've beet 98-2006 mustang GT's.Two different 350z's and countless vtec hondas. 2zz celicas and 1 98 na 4.6L Cobra.
oh you drive a crapbalt? u have 2 liter with a turbo that about 10psi u wanna run a s2k with a turbo 10 psi willproduce around 390rwhp on a gt35 turbo. my tl ha bolt ons the whole thing is a chevy is a chevy its a average car at best. not worth anything. my could buy 2 chevies easy. please dont ever cmopare yourjunk to a acura. 2 liter with a turbo only producing 260 is weak.
Wow you're even more stupid than I thought. Name one stock turbo 2.0l that has more than 260hp. Thats right, you can't. If I got the gm stage3 kit and a gt35r turbo i would be clove to 500hp. What then. I would eat a stock s2000 and your bolt on acura. Stop hating you fukin fag, you're nothing.
HHR SS turbo. Its basically the same exact thing as the new Cobalt SS. Just a hatchback not a coupe or sedan. Check out my vids. Unlike the majority of trash talkers I have vids to back up my claims.
nice, i got me a 2004 impala 3.4 l v6 , and love em, but it sucks how yours stops at a max of 107, you chould get a chip, or disable that one and it would hit 120 easy
I had the same car, it did respond better. I timed it, it was about 8.5 seconds (this one is about a second slower). It's great all the way to 50 then it shifts and the rpm drops, that's where it loses time.
But off the line with its torquey engine combined with the low weight (only 3400lbs for a full size sedan) the car accelerates very well.
Comfy ride, good MPG...good times. Wish my Z28 could be as practical as that clean-on-the-outside-ice-cream-pain-job-pimpala. :P
hell no it wasnt to the floor from start to finish watch the rpm's rise and fall, i like how it shifts like a manual, you reached 60 before it shifted
It does. A lot less. At least the base does, dunno which options you had on your LS. Cause the heated seats are pretty heavy, and so is the 3.8 engine. It's more reliable though, 20hp more power as well.
@pyromonster99 Yeah that is why the Impala is reted at 30+ MPG on the highway, it's the only car in it's class with a V6 four speed automatic to have this fuel economy, other V6's have do have it, but they have to use a 5 or 6 speed automatic, and most 5 or 6 speed autos are failur prone.
you have it completly backwards, for power you need both air and gasoline. the less air you have the less power you get,......enough said. google it if you dont take my word for it.
the description does say holiday in arizona so there could be 2-4 passengers. So if he did a vid of just him in the car it would be faster cause it would not have all the extra weight in the car. Probably shave off a second
I used a digital timer and clocked the 0-60 time in the high 8-second range. That's rather disappointing to see. But, I can understand that since the gears are so long. It's still faster than my '92 Lumina, '89 Reatta, and '07 Kia Sportage though (god, they are the slowest cars I've ever driven!). My Lumina would hold 1st until about 45, then hold 2nd until 80. After that, 3rd gear just kept taking it until it hit its top speed (around 110ish).
ur drowning the engine, use 91 and dont punch the accelerator all the way in at start up. i have a 2005 imapala 3.4 stock and can do 0-60 in 6 seconds
That's not true, I used to have a 2000 Impala 3.4. It was quick, but it couldn't do 0-60 in 6 seconds. The new style SS takes 5.6 seconds to get to 60 and that's a V8.
ill post a video. the only difference is a K&N air filter and 91 octane. if you cant accelerate a car the right way you wont get the proper take off. too much gas not enough air=sluggish take off. right amount of gas and air=boost to 2nd. after that u can floor it. were talking about a stand still. its easier to get more take off when the car is already in motion.
We'll see, but I still wonder that if what you say really makes that much of a difference to acceleration, why don't car magazines use it to achieve better 0-60 runs? You make some sense though, I just don't see how you can go from 0-60 in around 8 secs all the way down to 6 just by not tromping the gas rigt off the line. You do have some mods though.
many car magz test from 5-60 rather then 0-60. Maybe what Dose is saying makes sense. However the computer should make the difference of fuel/air ration to achieve best performance at all times so.. who knows, lets write to GM to find out lol
More like 7.9 seconds. I have one, the camera is at a bad angle and it makes it look like the speedo is reading lower than it actually is. Mine shifts out of first right at 60mph.
this video is bull my impala 08 the fuel shut off pint is 90 mph
MultiBigbear1234 2 months ago
Glad my 07 doesn't limit at 107. So far I've gotten it to 120.
Jrrath 7 months ago
@Jrrath is yours a lt or ltz?
yeawhatugondo 3 months ago
I Prefer a the Rear Wheel Drive B-Body Impalas to the Front Drive W-Body Impalas.
form109 7 months ago 3
every one hates but my 04 cammed 3800 would put most your cars the shame,,even though its not really a sports car this one is about 800 pounds more and not really the fastest car but its a beast and will last forever if looked after
st3v3n98 7 months ago
all that money you pay for that ugly ass car and it moves that damn slow
TheThetiger1123 8 months ago
Needless to say, but the 2012 impala that is coming out is going to be much better. Chevrolet is not going to redesign the Impala at all, however they are giving it entire new drive train that give's you six gears & pumps out 320 HorsePower from a new engine! Yet it still get's 30+ mpg on highway with those 320 horses on board.
joewillgo 8 months ago
why do y'all jack ass wanna go so damn fast and kill one another? an impala is one of the best cars out their they last a long time and maybe more in bed then some of yall jack ass smh crash dummys these days
waldo6435 8 months ago
I bet thats not even there car, it's probably a rental
hmnieu 9 months ago
Lol. I remember when I rented one of these for a trip to California, Top speed limited to 107 MPH. Boring, isn't it?
Footballer3932 11 months ago
0-60 in first gear. I love it! I can't wait to get mine.
LlFiasco 1 year ago
0-60 in 10 seconds.. not bad.. But agreed. This would not be the best vehicle for a race. The 95-98 Buick park avenues aren't that bad thoguh. 0-100 in 10 seconds.
xJesseriotx 1 year ago
@xJesseriotx 0-60 in ten seconds is horrid! I could see even 8 seconds for that car as being okay but meh. That sucks :(
getoffmeluckycharms 8 months ago
SS is better
Hyyerr 1 year ago
This is Toyota Prius slow.... I take that back, this is even slower than a Prius.
BigCarpFoxRiver 1 year ago
dont be stupid the governor stops it at 107 i deactivated mine and hit 140 but my car was a 9 sec 0*60 remove the gorvernor and ur time decreases about a sec and depends how u drive it too?
FHSLopezFHS 1 year ago
@FHSLopezFHS how did you deactivated
clado89 1 year ago
the gearing is meant for good gas mileage not racing lol
rob16875 1 year ago
this cars handling is horrible and low end torque is jus absent.. We test drove one and couldnt wait to take it back
ZoFromABSZ 1 year ago
my 04 3.8 is at 180 000 k and still got no problems with the moters and has way more low end torqe then the 3.9
st3v3n98 1 year ago
hahaha speed limited to 107 cheap!!! lol
LOPEZ1562 1 year ago
did it start from 2nd gear
thetickleninjas 1 year ago
Why is this 3.5 soo slow lol my 3.5 does 7.2 seconds stock on a flat surface
90Mrknowitall 1 year ago
Audi and several other German manufacturers reached the same results 20 years ago
muff1488 1 year ago
actually, i was just racing a mustang yesterday in my 01 chevy impala LS (mustang was an 08 or 09) and i owned the crap outta his car, got me up to 120 easily...i did rebuild the engine and made small modifications but nothing that would seriously bosst me
BLG4real 1 year ago
@BLG4real Dude, All you need to do is to buy an ex police Impala which comes with all kinds of shit that makes it go fast. I used to do 0-60 in 7 seconds with mine even though it had 300K miles on it.
cafeflorab4 1 year ago
@cafeflorab4 mine will get from 0-60 in 5.5 seconds lol its freakin fast
BLG4real 1 year ago
@BLG4real Is it an ex squad car? Did you add any mods to it? I know the new SS can do 5.5 but the 6 cylinders they're running now are the LTZ which does about 7.5 seconds and the police supposedly does 6.8 seconds.
cafeflorab4 1 year ago
wow its slow as fuck! lol my dad's 1994 leberon GTC goes faster and thats a peace of shit car
afr126 1 year ago
long gears
danielhemi2 1 year ago
holy shit! my little 3.0 ranger is quicker than that
itsoundzgood 1 year ago
@demariojason We came here cause we didn't imagine the acceleration would be this shitty
zyro70 1 year ago
@deltaboy767 You're 4 speed automatic getting 30+ mpg doesn't make it any less shitty that you only have 4 gears. It's also a matter of 5-6 speeds being quicker and more fun to drive.
And second, the 2010 Impala is only rated for 29 mpg, and thats highway. It gets 18 mpg in the city, which is pretty damn shitty. Where's your 4 speed now?
And seriously. 211 hp out of a 3.5 liter v6? Every other not shitty company's 3.5 v6 would make 270+ hp.
zyro70 1 year ago
people are bitches...Impala FTW!
ShieldsJustice 1 year ago
people that talk shit about this vid must be intimidated because If you never like this car/upload, then why in the fuck are you wasting your life going to this vid in the 1st place??? Where's the logic in this stupidity? Moronic individuals!
demariojason 1 year ago
8.60 seconds . Its V6 .
the SS get it about 5.58 seconds
zsecsqxsw92 1 year ago
Yeah this is a v6. So slow!
irdrgn 1 year ago
8.2 sec 0-60
coltonwithano 1 year ago
IS very slow, its a 6 cil?
dego2899 2 years ago
Comment removed
xxtmarxx 2 years ago
Will you fags stop arguing. Don't get an impala if you wan't speed. Get one if you wan't RELIABILITY and handling. And yes they are excellent cars nomatter what you douchebags say. And yes 112 miles an hour is plenty fast for you jackasses.
stevenmorookian16 2 years ago 29
@stevenmorookian16 The most reliable car ever!! Don't forget: GET A White Impala and everyone will get out of your way especially if you drive with the headlights on. I never got cut off when I drove my white Impala.
cafeflorab4 1 year ago
@stevenmorookian16 Nothing from from GM is reliable. You're a moron.
idontcare80 1 year ago
@stevenmorookian16 112 MPH is nothing for a car with a big V6
my fuckin sentra can hit 140
and realible?
lol good one
there are so many cars that will last twice as long as the impala and cost like 2/3 as much and actually have gearing that makes sense
i mean 60 in first?
come on garbage motors i mean general motors
123mrkevind 1 year ago
actually impala ss could go up to 150 and it should top out
coolgames14 1 year ago
60 in first lol
is that the 3.5 or the 3.9?
degaik 2 years ago
Does this come with a compass and temperature gauge on the dash?
Goldenrod636 2 years ago
The compass is above the ambient temperature readout. (86°F) In this video it says "CAL", meaning it was in calibration mode for some reason. The engine temp gauge is on the far right side of the screen. Next to that is the fuel gauge which is off-camera.
MajorWayne 2 years ago
Every sinlge chevy is the same on the inside that shows creativity. and who puts crank windows in a brand new car for 10,000? Not honda or any import. ONLY CHEVY. Who puts a big V-8 on a FWD car, only chevy. The last time I checked, HONDA is still in business pontiac onwers.
D15TURBED1 2 years ago
Ok lets put a V8 in a honda and see how affordible it is:)
07blkCobalt 2 years ago
And after they see the movie fast and the furious they get into their car and they're like "HOLY FUCK! I GOT A RACE CAR!"
IMANDALORIAN 2 years ago
@IMANDALORIAN ROFL
afr126 1 year ago
the gears are just so useless
20044runner 2 years ago 15
lol i agree
maxing out in first gear at 55 mph! rofl!!
demonik200 2 years ago
@20044runner Yea GM geared these way to high but they did that for fuel economy not for speed. I say that if they wanted it to be fast they would have made it to be fast. But that's just me. That's why they have cars like the Camaro and Vette!
amdrewi 1 year ago
@amdrewi But GM cars have horrible fuel economy.
wow0yunnies 1 year ago
@wow0yunnies GM has horrible fuel econoy, really? Humm I know your WRONG, cause the Impala is rated at 30+ MPG with a four speed automatic, other makers have to use a 5 or 6 speed to get the same results, so get your facts together before you speek.
deltaboy767 1 year ago
@deltaboy767 Are you stupid? Go to GM website, and look at the mpg listed there. You need to shut your mouth before you speak.
wow0yunnies 1 year ago
@wow0yunnies Excue me, I own a 2010 impala, and i'll scann the god damm window sticker, and show your ass, NOW WHAT!!! and Chevy,com gives the epa of 30 MPG on the LT model with the 3.5 V6. So again you need to shut your hole before you speak.
deltaboy767 1 year ago
@deltaboy767 OMG, you retard, read the GM website, and tell me there's 3X after MPG.
wow0yunnies 1 year ago
@wow0yunnies aren't everyone's mouths close before they speak? 0_o :PPP
afr126 1 year ago
@deltaboy767 *speak* :P
afr126 1 year ago
@amdrewi ture
afr126 1 year ago
ehh.... not too bad, but could DEFINETELY benefit from MUCH shorter gear ratios
4MATICbenz 2 years ago
3 gears transmition... what a shit gm
mrgingles 2 years ago
lets be real here a civic si 2 liter is fater then your impala a rsx 2.0 liter is faster then your impala a acura tl 3.2 270hp is faster then your car by far. the only thing smokin would be your engine. the 3.9 is coarse and unrefined. poor engineering 3.9 liters 233hp? hondas 2 liter engine makes 240 where you at? u cant see honda fool
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
@rob16875 LMFAO! YOUR FUNNY ! AHAAHAHAA ! YEAHHH RITE ! AN IMPALA MORE LUXURIOUS THEN A HONDA OR TOYOTA ? OKAYY BUDDY ! KEEP DREAMING ! REMBR ACURA AND LEXUS ! ? TEHEHE LMAO!
wongmylesa 2 years ago
need to change the gearing in dat thing...
occckid123 2 years ago 2
I just bought one and no way this guy is all the way in it. The car accelerates way faster.
TheTheconcious1 2 years ago
Well this may be the one with the 3.5L V6, its not anything compared to the 3.8L series 3 or the 5.3L V8s they have in the higher models
DystruktoBoi1 2 years ago
people dont be so harsh its a huge car with a 3.5 v6, its alot bigger haevier and more luxurious than your hondas and toyotas
rob16875 2 years ago 2
ROFL, that is the funiest shit i have ever heard. my honda/acura is by far better then any chevy n the road and also 5 star crash rating on all of our cars, not tomention worth the most for resale and depreciates the least of allcars onthe market. i got a 3.2 and willsmoke your 3.5 , 3.9 and your 5.3 liter engines. in my 3.2. please dont ever talk shit.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
sounds to me like you might be a RICER
tmd963 2 years ago
a ricer? i drive a Acura TL A-SPEC. 3.2 liter V6 with over 300HP with bolt on's out of a 3.2 liter engine. this car sucks. u suck and nobody likes you. i dont like you. your parents dont like you. impala is a disgrace engine is coarse. i could run faster then thing goes. u have bigger engine and yet you would get smoked in a race. v6 on v6
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
lmao, ok i will beileve it when i see it, and i dont have an impala, and it still sounds like your a riiiiiccceeerrr
tmd963 2 years ago
dont get mad, your car sucks, your engine sucks, and chevy sucks. how am i a rcier when i drive a 3.2 liter v6 that would smoke your car which is a 3.9 liter? acura is better then a impala in so many ways its not even funny.how much money u willing to put on a race between your shitty car and my Acura. bottom line is your just another dumb american who thinks chevy is patriotic when in fact your car was built in canada or mexico and my acura built in ohio. fuck your chevy POS. anyday ,anytime
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
lol do i sound mad? your just rambling on about some dumb honda you have and about how it can beat everybody blah blah blah, what a crock. Your just another ricer wishing his car was anything but slow, and again i dont have an impala or a 3.9, ive got a 3.4 monte carlo
tmd963 2 years ago
Your acura cost around $10,000 more than this car. The Impala has more room. The door hinges on the TL are shit.
btw
The impala ss would school your car like a bitch.
buickman85 2 years ago
r u serious? LMAO 1st the impala is a poormans buick. my acura is 3.2 liter spushing 270 stock. yours is 3.9 233hp? lame. bottomline is this my car is better crash rating,. worth x2 as much as yours better interior more power better engine more efficient and the inside doesnt looklike it was made frmo a dollar generalstore. stfu noob
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
What year is your TL.
buickman85 2 years ago
2006 tl-APSEC stock ran 14.17 modded now cai, full quad exhaust, TB Spacer, j pipe stock is 270 HP imabout 300 or 305@crank. imnoty saying the impalais a terrible car. but in comaprison inmany reports its not as good as the TL. impala= 2.5 stars out of 5
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
You are comparing a luxury car to a chevy, a six speed to a four speed auto, $35,000 to $24,000. This car also weighs 300lbs more than your TL. The TL is more like the Lacrosse in comparison.
buickman85 2 years ago
alright man seriously lets thinkabout this. acura makes a 3.5 liter type -s with 286 and the auto runs 14.0 flat. u have a 5.3 liter V8 only producing 303hp. 4 speed automatic is gm's fault for being dumb as always. im not saying these are badcars however in all honesty they are dept. of the treasury cars. the new rl is v8 powered by a v8 4.4 liter 420hp. chevy is a budget car like a dodge or ford.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
My father has a 2004 TL auto and I have drove it before. Back in 05 I had it for a couple days and raced some cars with it. I schooled a scion tc that had cai and custom exhaust. I also took a 2004 civic si. Then I raced my friends 2004 regal gs. All it has is a cai and a performance muffler. I thought for sure that I would win. At around 80mph the regal was a full car length ahead of me.
buickman85 2 years ago
tl auto arent bad they are average. a regal is supercharged how dou ever come froced induction to a car that isnt? SC the tl and u got around 13.0 my car i keep up withj the new mustangs with 300HPi bet i run around a 13.6 or 13.7. i kill chargers any old mustang camaros are good for awhile subies from a roll noproblem frmo a dig they will kill alot ofcars.put that regall with me and i guarantee it willhave no shot. and thenthe type -s regal has no shot guaranteed.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
The regal also had 18 inch wheels and a lot of wheel spin off the line. I mean The wheels spinned through most of 1st gear. The acura actually pulled ahead until around 50 ish. I remember this race well, because I only raced against 5 or 6 cars with the TL. This is the only car that I lost to.
btw
The rest of the cars that I raced were all modified pocket rockets.
buickman85 2 years ago
Have you ever raced a g37?
buickman85 2 years ago
Can you make a video of your TL?
buickman85 2 years ago
2006 tl type-s 6speed 0-60 5.5 sec QM 14.1 sec
2006 impala ss 4speed O/D auto 0-60 5.6 sec QM 14.2 sec
I bet if we did 10 runs with these cars the impala would win most of them.
buickman85 2 years ago
this is bottom line acura is by far superior thenany american car. my nextcar will prolly be a merc cause its a high hp, rwd luxury car. and the AMG E55 runs about 12.3 stock in 1/4. thats ridiculious for a 4000lb car. mercedes and bmw are comparable with acura but different kind comparable. acura is more reliable but fwd is avg sometimes, i like rwd and fwd. not a fan of awd as much.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
RWD is the best in overall.
btw
Cadillac is the best american car.
buickman85 2 years ago
@cadillac is average in comparison to european and japanese luxury cars. cadillac makes descent power but takes alot of dispalcement and a supercharger to produce500HP other automakers us a n/a engine which is usually better but mercedes makes gret engines also. i wont drive gm dodge or fo9rd they are dept of treasury cars owned by obama and congress. no thanks obama works for bankers anyways passing more taxes on this country and mccain and hillary and the bushs they are all the same
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
acura = fail
degaik 2 years ago
gm=fail=bankrupt=cause nobody buys theirjunk= us dept of treasury car is it american ro buy a chevy built in another country? aT LEAST MY ACURA IS BUILT IN OHIO UNLIKES YOUR SHIT BUILT IN CANADA ANDMEXICO DICKFACE look it up moron
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
@pureadrenaline25 your the dickface here,you simply assumed that I owned a GM.
Well I dont you dumbass,and let me also tell you that I wouldnt pay through the nose for some souped up honda.
Go drive your POS tl of a cliff you douchebag.
degaik 2 years ago
we are talking bm and acura and you dont have either so why are you inthe convo? man shit the fuck up , bottom line, me and you in person face to face you would shake my hand and tuck tail. cause this dog hunts. believe it.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Why does it matter where the car is built?
buickman85 2 years ago
how is it american if it it built and or assembled in another country? cmonman, if gm is supposedly american why do their have subpar labor from canada and mexico doing their work? how is that american? butmaybe its american that that put a ugly ass bowtie emblem on the car no matter what parts or where it is built means it is american? thats dogshit and u know it. thats about american as our president saying he is for the people, when we all know he is for the bankers. cmon man think..
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
If GM wasn't bailed out the unemployment rate would be way higher. There would of been a shit load of companies closing. There would have been a domino effect. I am an independent and did not vote for Obama and I do not like his administration one little bit.
btw Why does it matter if your tl and the rdx are built in the USA? The rest of the acura cars are built in japan and canada.
buickman85 2 years ago
There are a lot of chevys,buicks,cadillacs,and GMCs that are built here.
buickman85 2 years ago
most are garbage and u and iboth know that
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Your right Acura is garbage and a waste of money. Finally we agree on something.
buickman85 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ill race my acura vs impala malibu and your fuckin v8 POS 5.3 liter 303 hp and watch u lose whqt u think about dat buick fag your cars are out of date why should i buy out a gm when i dont drive their hidesous shit
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
If we both drove these cars for the first time your bonneville..I'm sorry your TL would loose 8 out of 10 runs. My 85 regal t-type would school your car 10 out of 10 runs. It cost me $3,500 and I have put $5000 into it. It hits 60 in the low 4's and does the quarter mile in 12.57.
buickman85 2 years ago
I saw your page looks like you got a lot of people haten your ricer ass. Maybe if you put some vtec decals on your over priced POS honda you will turn it into a 10 second car.
LOSER!!!
buickman85 2 years ago
There is nothing unique about your cars styling. It looks like a mid-size Pontiac Bonneville from the year 2000.
buickman85 2 years ago
lmao acura is by far better then gm any day of the week the only reason ppl buy american is becuase it soooo american., fuck that i buy the better product. pounf dfor pound any motors liter for liter gm loses to imports
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
your comparing door hinges?? wow man. An acura TL type S would school the "SS like a bitch". If you wanna talk the sport edition of the impala why not the sport edition of the TL. There is no comparing the impala to the TL, the TL is an amazing car. period.
RF15T1 2 years ago
Over 300HP with bolt on's? lol they come stock at 270HP. You POS autozone "Cold air intake" wont get you 30HP+. Stupid fuck.
KarlT01 2 years ago
lmso, hilariosu typicla answer from a american who is ignorant. stupidity can be bought , u bought a chevy, see its easy isnt it? the bottom line is my car produces 270stock@ crank. with bolt ons the j32a motor repsonds well to boltons. your impala doesnt have a chance. your 5.3 v8 doesnt either. uhave to have a 5.7 or 6 liter to beat my car. im curious why isit that your v6's have such a hard time competing with import v6's? and your inline 4's to ours? dont worry we will build a V8 soon.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Man... Even your own mom hates your ugly face. I never have owned a Chevy in my my life. I have 3.0L V6 220HP Manual 1995 SHO and 5.3 L V8 303HP 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP. Eat my shit you rice boy.
KarlT01 2 years ago
So what is it that you own? Acura TL? Unless you have the type S you are not beating much. Even if you do, you're bragging about a large, heavy, family sedan. You don't have any videos backing up any of your claims either. I happen to drive a Chevy. 2.0l turbo producing 260bhp. All stock. 0-60 anywhere between 5.5 and 6 seconds depending on road conditions and traction. I've beet 98-2006 mustang GT's.Two different 350z's and countless vtec hondas. 2zz celicas and 1 98 na 4.6L Cobra.
VitaminE6SS 2 years ago
oh you drive a crapbalt? u have 2 liter with a turbo that about 10psi u wanna run a s2k with a turbo 10 psi willproduce around 390rwhp on a gt35 turbo. my tl ha bolt ons the whole thing is a chevy is a chevy its a average car at best. not worth anything. my could buy 2 chevies easy. please dont ever cmopare yourjunk to a acura. 2 liter with a turbo only producing 260 is weak.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Wow you're even more stupid than I thought. Name one stock turbo 2.0l that has more than 260hp. Thats right, you can't. If I got the gm stage3 kit and a gt35r turbo i would be clove to 500hp. What then. I would eat a stock s2000 and your bolt on acura. Stop hating you fukin fag, you're nothing.
VitaminE6SS 2 years ago
What do you drive?
orbitofdoom16 2 years ago
HHR SS turbo. Its basically the same exact thing as the new Cobalt SS. Just a hatchback not a coupe or sedan. Check out my vids. Unlike the majority of trash talkers I have vids to back up my claims.
VitaminE6SS 2 years ago
nice, i got me a 2004 impala 3.4 l v6 , and love em, but it sucks how yours stops at a max of 107, you chould get a chip, or disable that one and it would hit 120 easy
meonfosho 2 years ago
sucks
1gt289 2 years ago 2
ist the driver...not the car.
SONYVINO15 2 years ago
i have a 2002 3.4 L when i floor it, it responds alot better then this, unless this wasnt at the floor
themundayman 2 years ago
I had the same car, it did respond better. I timed it, it was about 8.5 seconds (this one is about a second slower). It's great all the way to 50 then it shifts and the rpm drops, that's where it loses time.
But off the line with its torquey engine combined with the low weight (only 3400lbs for a full size sedan) the car accelerates very well.
Comfy ride, good MPG...good times. Wish my Z28 could be as practical as that clean-on-the-outside-ice-cream-pain-job-pimpala. :P
AmirGTR 2 years ago
hell no it wasnt to the floor from start to finish watch the rpm's rise and fall, i like how it shifts like a manual, you reached 60 before it shifted
meonfosho 2 years ago
I hope that wasnt totally floored the whole time.. my 2000 LS is a bit quicker (but its got the 3.8 and probably weighs less)
Celrage 2 years ago
It does. A lot less. At least the base does, dunno which options you had on your LS. Cause the heated seats are pretty heavy, and so is the 3.8 engine. It's more reliable though, 20hp more power as well.
AmirGTR 2 years ago
HAHA!!it actually displays that their is a governor limit on the car. man thats funny
FoxyWolfProductionz 2 years ago
damn dude, limited to 107, next thing you know youll be getting unknown speeding tickets by mail w/ a program that let the govt. know your speeding
whipalicious08 2 years ago
the 3.5 in my pathfinder is faster then that....
07tundra6in 2 years ago
i agree with doug1bite u need air and fuel to burn gas. less air = less fuel efficiency which = less power
HaloSpartan86 2 years ago
did anyone notice at 32-34 seconds it displays "speed limited to 107 MPH"? just wondering what that is and if anyone else saw it
ahacksor 2 years ago
It means exactly what it says. Chevy limits the car to 107 MPH. At 107, the computer says "no more" and the car won't accelerate anymore.
nakedcomputing 2 years ago
i know that much, is there a way arround it?
ahacksor 2 years ago
get a chip, it takes the limiter off
my old '06 Impala LTZ did the same thing...
I know there are chips for like $40, but remember, you get what you pay for- expect $300+
chevyrules3 2 years ago
that is he governor kicking in on the engine and cutting the fuel so the car cannot accelerate until the speed is lower
cboc19 2 years ago
its as fast as a windstar
l3oss2u 2 years ago
nice 8.8 sec to 60 mph
Ganbala 2 years ago
It's actually faster.. he did floor the pedal at the beginning..
americanstylefreak 2 years ago
it's probably a base 3.6 liter V6?
and yeah, I don't think he had it floored the whole time
chevyrules3 2 years ago
1st gear goes to 60mph, then 2nd gear goes to 100 mph.
wtf, those gears are way toooo long
pyromonster99 2 years ago 3
@pyromonster99 Yeah that is why the Impala is reted at 30+ MPG on the highway, it's the only car in it's class with a V6 four speed automatic to have this fuel economy, other V6's have do have it, but they have to use a 5 or 6 speed automatic, and most 5 or 6 speed autos are failur prone.
deltaboy767 1 year ago
breaking the law breaking the law! I did this too going to vegas, on the desert!
tagima 3 years ago
is this the 3.5 211hp?
20044runner 3 years ago
throw a turbo in that thing ur gonna be goin 115 -120
legendofspades2004 3 years ago
well this is in arizona so the higher elevation would warrent lower performance
doug1bite 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
actually in higher elevations u have better performance the air is thinner u fool
legendofspades2004 3 years ago
you have it completly backwards, for power you need both air and gasoline. the less air you have the less power you get,......enough said. google it if you dont take my word for it.
doug1bite 3 years ago 2
the description does say holiday in arizona so there could be 2-4 passengers. So if he did a vid of just him in the car it would be faster cause it would not have all the extra weight in the car. Probably shave off a second
pye0123456789 3 years ago
I used a digital timer and clocked the 0-60 time in the high 8-second range. That's rather disappointing to see. But, I can understand that since the gears are so long. It's still faster than my '92 Lumina, '89 Reatta, and '07 Kia Sportage though (god, they are the slowest cars I've ever driven!). My Lumina would hold 1st until about 45, then hold 2nd until 80. After that, 3rd gear just kept taking it until it hit its top speed (around 110ish).
Halogen360 3 years ago
damn thats almost like my car ecpet mines looks like a lil faster its a 3.1 Corsica check out my vid i did a 30-120 pull
ESESW1FTY323 3 years ago
Granny geared for sure
453Bandit 3 years ago 2
the 3.5 liter has the long gears for economy and the 3.9 has shorter gears for acceleration
Damon1420 3 years ago
ur drowning the engine, use 91 and dont punch the accelerator all the way in at start up. i have a 2005 imapala 3.4 stock and can do 0-60 in 6 seconds
dose17 3 years ago
That's not true, I used to have a 2000 Impala 3.4. It was quick, but it couldn't do 0-60 in 6 seconds. The new style SS takes 5.6 seconds to get to 60 and that's a V8.
GeneralMotorsRules 3 years ago
ill post a video. the only difference is a K&N air filter and 91 octane. if you cant accelerate a car the right way you wont get the proper take off. too much gas not enough air=sluggish take off. right amount of gas and air=boost to 2nd. after that u can floor it. were talking about a stand still. its easier to get more take off when the car is already in motion.
dose17 3 years ago
We'll see, but I still wonder that if what you say really makes that much of a difference to acceleration, why don't car magazines use it to achieve better 0-60 runs? You make some sense though, I just don't see how you can go from 0-60 in around 8 secs all the way down to 6 just by not tromping the gas rigt off the line. You do have some mods though.
GeneralMotorsRules 3 years ago
many car magz test from 5-60 rather then 0-60. Maybe what Dose is saying makes sense. However the computer should make the difference of fuel/air ration to achieve best performance at all times so.. who knows, lets write to GM to find out lol
Ryantravisaol 3 years ago
0-60 in 6 seconds? Where'd you learn to count? Like 10 seconds.
gumper1986 3 years ago
This car is geared veryyyy weird!
Lumryan 3 years ago 3
wow.. first gear gets up to like 55 MPH.
ianalexroberts 3 years ago
haha 5 mpg. thats like driving a hummer almost. limited to 107. that sucks.
kevindillon00 3 years ago
No, Hummers get 5 mpg during regular driving.
mejasond 3 years ago
whatever... im not being exact
kevindillon00 3 years ago
see, thats wierd. ive hit 110 in my 2008 impala ss. i never got the 107 limiter. hmm
5PTWHOA 3 years ago
the SS's speed computer is probobly configured differently than the regular impala
kevindillon00 3 years ago
Took 9 seconds...pretty slow. But at least it kept accelerating after that.
wildbloodydragon 3 years ago
it's capable of 7.8
milo814 3 years ago
Hope so. :P
wildbloodydragon 3 years ago
instant fuel economy 5 mpg damn!!
chevyman217 3 years ago
limited to 107! that sucks man :(
DeSmetownescbc 3 years ago
did anyone see the "instant economy 5 mpg" below speedo, ouch. lol.
leightondw 3 years ago
God that thing is a dog. My 92 lesabre could beat that car.
sirbuick 3 years ago
is that right? 0-60 in 9 sec????
darkstargtx 3 years ago
More like 7.9 seconds. I have one, the camera is at a bad angle and it makes it look like the speedo is reading lower than it actually is. Mine shifts out of first right at 60mph.
GeneralMotorsRules 3 years ago