So now it's OK to take from us to support people in the same condition we were in but don't have the brass ones to change their life like we did. And by the way since we made it we should be able to spend it anyway we darn well pleased. By the way, if corporations and companies collapse, there will be no jobs. By the way we make our money by producing and investing.
Excuse me but what about people that came from poor families that busted their butts and are now finally in their old age living well ? I grew up in a three room shack with junked cars in the yard, hubby grew up in a family of 6 without his father who deserted the family. We worked hard and paid our own way through college and have never accepted a dime in charity or help from anyone,anywhere.
So now it's OK to take from us to support people in the same condition we were in (continued)
Google Fairtax second tier -- it has a trillion dollar "second tier" of taxation, that is central to their "plan". SInce they know they can't collect this "second tier" of taxation (that is why they hid it), their own plan is a farce.
I mean literally, a farce -- they KNOW their own plan is a joke, and have avoided hearings under oath for 13 years.
All these names are the same person. Compare vocabulary and style. Just "thumbs down" and flag each of his comments. Hopefully he'll eventually give up. BullshipDetector, CanteenKid, FarceTax, FilmCriticOne, NawwLeans, MakeMyPower, MarkDouglasC, MathTruthTax, MyBookDeal, MyBookWork, NavyBeer, NeilTaxCon, PrebateNonsense, Taxfools, TaxSanity, TruthMattersToMe, TubeTaxPro, 12FlyMe, SteamBoatCamp, ItchMyFoot, RooferHoofer, MybookDeal, etc etc.
He really didn't, he bought 86-DOS (actually lets be accurate, he got sombody else to buy it for him) from a company called Seattle Computer products then hired a bunch of people to make a GUI for it based on Mac's GUI then he sold it. This is part of the reason Windows is so shitty today, it's based on a patched and cobbled version of a Shell designed for 8086.
The only real merit in Gates was he was very smart in using vendor lock-in to ensure people remain dependant on his OS.
Well first off corporations would have to pay tax in the first place instead of hiding money in other countries and paying zero tax. Even if you did what Forbes wanted to do and do a 15% flat tax which seems fair, it wouldn't be. After 90k you don't pay anymore into SS which means that the poor who make under 90K would be paying 15% + SS on their entire paycheck versus a rich person paying 15% + (SS up to 90k ).. So the poor would still be paying a bigger % of their pay..Fuck the rich
Immendam always has this look and sound to his voice like he huffed a fuck-load of free-on and someone lit all of his body hair on fire but instead of him shaving it off, he just kept it. I think it's awesome!!
Since Fairtax is a literally a farce -- it won't turn anything into anything.
Even the fucking Fairtax leaders know their own plan is make believe fucking nonsense -- you can't fucking get half your revenue FROM the fucking government.
Read my lips -- FAIRTAX is bullshit. They aren't even trying to pass it.
13 years -- not ONE corporation is for them, yet it gets rid of ALL their taxes. Why aren't corps falling for it?
Savings is much like gold peddling. We're not on the gold standard, so the only people who benefit from gold are the people who deal gold and those who have a lot of risk capital to invest (savings) and spend a lot internationally..where security is maintained in monetary value fluctuations. Much the same, savings is worthless if you maintain it in your national economy and it tanks..and a lot of 401k holders have been finding that out recently.
i like mike gravel's idea of a progressive sales tax... maybe it would work in combo with a more progressive income tax. that would tax rich and poor more fairly and change us from a consuming nation to a saving nation.
Mike Gravel used to be awesome. In his dotage, he fell for a farce. Fairtax fine print is a massive tax on cities and states. Fairtax tries to cover this shit up -- cause it won't fucking happen. You won't get California, for eg, to pay the fed government 50 billion in sales taxes on their own spending. Its FUCKING NUTS.
Its so FUCKING nuts, fairtax hides the shit. But that's what they base their fucking math on.
A Tobin tax is the suggested tax on all trade of currency across borders. Named after the economist James Tobin, the tax is intended to put a penalty on short-term speculation in currencies...
RIch people buying marble and such, do you know how many common men it takes to produce marble and gold leafing. Sure, theres no sense behind it, but the money is still being invested into the economy and it trickles down. Only reason to get angry at that is if youre jealous or you think that the marble and gold leaf could be put to better use somehow
Perhaps there's a way to measure value of work based on how it contributes to majority condition. I don't imagine somebody engineering a broadly contributive productive system would consider ppl using their money=work(time and energy application) for abundant over-valued art which only one person will enjoy. Activity distribution could probably be applied in a better way that would make more ppl happier.
Yes yes, but why would the vast majority of men be in favor of a system which arbitrarily awards a bigger slice of the pie and privilege to people whose wealth does not represent wholly (or at all) their own labors?
Unless you're going to posit some religious endorsement for this notion of property, why should "normal folks" be investing psychic/mental and physical energy into the protection of this parasitical arrangement?
It does reward the right peple. The people who create and maintain opportunity. without the people who create it, there wouldnt even BE anything for you to labor for!!! Its not about how hard one works, its about the product of their work. If there wasnt this so called "american dream", then people would not have the desire to advance or achieve. Your idea is religious. The idea that things arent "fair". that things arent "right". thats not logic, that is religion sir
Without people laboring, there wouldn't BE anything for the exploiters, either. And when Inmendham says "fair" then he goes on to define his version of fair. In other words, other people project their own meaning onto "fair" it's an irrelevant word. As far as "right" goes, he's aiming at right in a sense that it's right if we all can take care of ourselves on a clean planet, that kind of "right", call it religious if you want, but everyone here is arguing for what they think is "right".
that is religion. That is baseless religion. Personal feeling, and not at all whats best or even whats possible. Do you realize we have 6.5 billion people on this planet and rising. There will never be "clean" and "labors" are a dime a dozen. We need to pay the people who actually create opourtunity. We need to attract and motive people to create oportunity by not taxing the shit out of the 1% of the population who are capable of creating opourtinity for the rest
Silly, how old are you? His ideas are religion, but your status quo nonsense is not? You live in a fantasy world. You just spoke completely out of faith in the top 1 percent. Do you KNOW any rich people? Even they would agree with Inmenham's view, they wouldn't want anyone acting on it, but they know they don't do anything. My grandfather was a multimillionaire, he actually invented something, but he'd exploit labor in a heartbeat and he was a jerk.
The flat tax is ludicrous and combined with these rebates it's open to huge amounts of gaming and cheating. Anyone who endorses it has the head in the sand or the clouds.
My dad is a Landlord and he told me this about the fair tax he said it works for everyone, 30% of everything you buy gos down because of the coperate tax and 22% gos up because of sales tax. 8% cheaper for everything + no income tax. Food is not taxed so that's cheaper exports wont be taxed so that's cheaper and so on. Any way you put things in our society the wealthy will always come out on top.
Kyle your dad has been fooled. Food is taxed -- so is rent. Yes, ask your dad if his tenants can pay 30% sales tax -- on rent. And utilities. And food. And car insurance.
But the big pile of shit on fairtax -- these bastards pretend they will tax the fucking government to get money.
Bull fucking shit - only people pay taxes. These Fairtax loony birds won't even have congressional hearing -- they know their own plan is total bullshit.
if he thinks that paying the same percentage is the definition of fair, doesn't it follow logically that all wages should also be equal? somehow i doubt he'd think that was fair. but wouldn't that be 'fair'? kinda sounds like communism to me.
Part 2
So now it's OK to take from us to support people in the same condition we were in but don't have the brass ones to change their life like we did. And by the way since we made it we should be able to spend it anyway we darn well pleased. By the way, if corporations and companies collapse, there will be no jobs. By the way we make our money by producing and investing.
patteel 9 months ago
Excuse me but what about people that came from poor families that busted their butts and are now finally in their old age living well ? I grew up in a three room shack with junked cars in the yard, hubby grew up in a family of 6 without his father who deserted the family. We worked hard and paid our own way through college and have never accepted a dime in charity or help from anyone,anywhere.
So now it's OK to take from us to support people in the same condition we were in (continued)
patteel 9 months ago
Fairtax sounds great, but it's really goofy.
Google Fairtax second tier -- it has a trillion dollar "second tier" of taxation, that is central to their "plan". SInce they know they can't collect this "second tier" of taxation (that is why they hid it), their own plan is a farce.
I mean literally, a farce -- they KNOW their own plan is a joke, and have avoided hearings under oath for 13 years.
Sounds great though.
12FlyMe 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All these names are the same person. Compare vocabulary and style. Just "thumbs down" and flag each of his comments. Hopefully he'll eventually give up. BullshipDetector, CanteenKid, FarceTax, FilmCriticOne, NawwLeans, MakeMyPower, MarkDouglasC, MathTruthTax, MyBookDeal, MyBookWork, NavyBeer, NeilTaxCon, PrebateNonsense, Taxfools, TaxSanity, TruthMattersToMe, TubeTaxPro, 12FlyMe, SteamBoatCamp, ItchMyFoot, RooferHoofer, MybookDeal, etc etc.
urgener 1 year ago
Comment removed
urgener 2 years ago
In terms of technological advancement Bill Gates contributed a lot.
Eldel15 2 years ago
@Eldel15
He really didn't, he bought 86-DOS (actually lets be accurate, he got sombody else to buy it for him) from a company called Seattle Computer products then hired a bunch of people to make a GUI for it based on Mac's GUI then he sold it. This is part of the reason Windows is so shitty today, it's based on a patched and cobbled version of a Shell designed for 8086.
The only real merit in Gates was he was very smart in using vendor lock-in to ensure people remain dependant on his OS.
ebonyeclipse 1 year ago
if ever1 savedever penny they have ...in the end there would be nothing to save for.That easy(one would thank:)
MrDispensable 2 years ago
Ohhhhh, this idiot is a Peter Schiff wing-nut.
itpduder 2 years ago
Well first off corporations would have to pay tax in the first place instead of hiding money in other countries and paying zero tax. Even if you did what Forbes wanted to do and do a 15% flat tax which seems fair, it wouldn't be. After 90k you don't pay anymore into SS which means that the poor who make under 90K would be paying 15% + SS on their entire paycheck versus a rich person paying 15% + (SS up to 90k ).. So the poor would still be paying a bigger % of their pay..Fuck the rich
funeralsong34 2 years ago
Amazing video.
GeraldWatercrest 2 years ago
Why debate with pathological liars? You think the rich became rich by being honest rational thinkers?
joesub007 2 years ago
Immendam always has this look and sound to his voice like he huffed a fuck-load of free-on and someone lit all of his body hair on fire but instead of him shaving it off, he just kept it. I think it's awesome!!
TurkishPoltergeist69 2 years ago
Why the fuck has NO major corporation come out for Fairtax -- when Fairtax gets rid of ALL their taxes?
Why the fuck in 13 years has Fairtax NEVER told cities or states about their fine print - that cities and states would have to pay massive taxes?
Why the fuck does Fairtax say only people pay taxes -- then in their fine print have the government pay about half its own revenues.
Fairtax is deceptive dishonest bullshit. Its so fucking bad they won't even fucking try to have a hearing.
IowaSea 2 years ago
Fairtax says business can NOT be taxed - because they will just pass on the cost of those taxes to people. "Only people pay taxes" said Neal Boortz.
Fine. But then Fairtax lies to your dumb asses and says the GOVERNMENT will pay massive taxes.
Page 148, The Fairtax Book: "The federal government itself will become a MAJOR taxpayer."
How the FUCK can government pay huge taxes - -but businesses CANT
Dumb fucks -- Fairtax is lying, Its a crock of shit. Google Fairtax absurdity.
IowaSea 2 years ago
The end of this vid, the last few minutes rocks.
jedimasterbooboo 2 years ago
Since Fairtax is a literally a farce -- it won't turn anything into anything.
Even the fucking Fairtax leaders know their own plan is make believe fucking nonsense -- you can't fucking get half your revenue FROM the fucking government.
Read my lips -- FAIRTAX is bullshit. They aren't even trying to pass it.
13 years -- not ONE corporation is for them, yet it gets rid of ALL their taxes. Why aren't corps falling for it?
Cause its FUCKING bullshit.
Google Fairtax absurdity.
IowaSea 2 years ago
That old camera has some sound issues.
Gardenghoul 2 years ago
Savings is much like gold peddling. We're not on the gold standard, so the only people who benefit from gold are the people who deal gold and those who have a lot of risk capital to invest (savings) and spend a lot internationally..where security is maintained in monetary value fluctuations. Much the same, savings is worthless if you maintain it in your national economy and it tanks..and a lot of 401k holders have been finding that out recently.
p717 2 years ago
i like mike gravel's idea of a progressive sales tax... maybe it would work in combo with a more progressive income tax. that would tax rich and poor more fairly and change us from a consuming nation to a saving nation.
1satyagraha1 2 years ago
Mike Gravel used to be awesome. In his dotage, he fell for a farce. Fairtax fine print is a massive tax on cities and states. Fairtax tries to cover this shit up -- cause it won't fucking happen. You won't get California, for eg, to pay the fed government 50 billion in sales taxes on their own spending. Its FUCKING NUTS.
Its so FUCKING nuts, fairtax hides the shit. But that's what they base their fucking math on.
Google Fairtax absurdity. Learn something
IowaSea 2 years ago
Tobin tax
A Tobin tax is the suggested tax on all trade of currency across borders. Named after the economist James Tobin, the tax is intended to put a penalty on short-term speculation in currencies...
Merci Wiki
RibbitAfterMe 2 years ago
Youre both jackasses but this dude youre replying to is just lost
bl4h1 2 years ago
RIch people buying marble and such, do you know how many common men it takes to produce marble and gold leafing. Sure, theres no sense behind it, but the money is still being invested into the economy and it trickles down. Only reason to get angry at that is if youre jealous or you think that the marble and gold leaf could be put to better use somehow
bl4h1 2 years ago
In fact those more high end products support a lot more people than the so called necessity products that you consume. like a box of cookies
bl4h1 2 years ago
Perhaps there's a way to measure value of work based on how it contributes to majority condition. I don't imagine somebody engineering a broadly contributive productive system would consider ppl using their money=work(time and energy application) for abundant over-valued art which only one person will enjoy. Activity distribution could probably be applied in a better way that would make more ppl happier.
SuperiorMind 2 years ago
dosnt matter its not productive work and why the fuck should one man own that much? silly
bluballzzz 2 years ago
Yes yes, but why would the vast majority of men be in favor of a system which arbitrarily awards a bigger slice of the pie and privilege to people whose wealth does not represent wholly (or at all) their own labors?
Unless you're going to posit some religious endorsement for this notion of property, why should "normal folks" be investing psychic/mental and physical energy into the protection of this parasitical arrangement?
KosmicCitizen 2 years ago
It does reward the right peple. The people who create and maintain opportunity. without the people who create it, there wouldnt even BE anything for you to labor for!!! Its not about how hard one works, its about the product of their work. If there wasnt this so called "american dream", then people would not have the desire to advance or achieve. Your idea is religious. The idea that things arent "fair". that things arent "right". thats not logic, that is religion sir
bl4h1 2 years ago
Without people laboring, there wouldn't BE anything for the exploiters, either. And when Inmendham says "fair" then he goes on to define his version of fair. In other words, other people project their own meaning onto "fair" it's an irrelevant word. As far as "right" goes, he's aiming at right in a sense that it's right if we all can take care of ourselves on a clean planet, that kind of "right", call it religious if you want, but everyone here is arguing for what they think is "right".
jedimasterbooboo 2 years ago
that is religion. That is baseless religion. Personal feeling, and not at all whats best or even whats possible. Do you realize we have 6.5 billion people on this planet and rising. There will never be "clean" and "labors" are a dime a dozen. We need to pay the people who actually create opourtunity. We need to attract and motive people to create oportunity by not taxing the shit out of the 1% of the population who are capable of creating opourtinity for the rest
bl4h1 2 years ago
Silly, how old are you? His ideas are religion, but your status quo nonsense is not? You live in a fantasy world. You just spoke completely out of faith in the top 1 percent. Do you KNOW any rich people? Even they would agree with Inmenham's view, they wouldn't want anyone acting on it, but they know they don't do anything. My grandfather was a multimillionaire, he actually invented something, but he'd exploit labor in a heartbeat and he was a jerk.
jedimasterbooboo 2 years ago
The flat tax is ludicrous and combined with these rebates it's open to huge amounts of gaming and cheating. Anyone who endorses it has the head in the sand or the clouds.
Invain01 2 years ago
My dad is a Landlord and he told me this about the fair tax he said it works for everyone, 30% of everything you buy gos down because of the coperate tax and 22% gos up because of sales tax. 8% cheaper for everything + no income tax. Food is not taxed so that's cheaper exports wont be taxed so that's cheaper and so on. Any way you put things in our society the wealthy will always come out on top.
KyleClarkUSA 2 years ago
Kyle your dad has been fooled. Food is taxed -- so is rent. Yes, ask your dad if his tenants can pay 30% sales tax -- on rent. And utilities. And food. And car insurance.
But the big pile of shit on fairtax -- these bastards pretend they will tax the fucking government to get money.
Bull fucking shit - only people pay taxes. These Fairtax loony birds won't even have congressional hearing -- they know their own plan is total bullshit.
Google Fairtax absurdity
IowaSea 2 years ago
22% btw and with every item you buy you pay the built in 30% sales tax.
KyleClarkUSA 2 years ago
I'm glad I gave up my old screenname. he used to always leave vid responses to me. he didn't show his face though back then.
LouieArrighi 2 years ago
The thing is, the rich all employ the workers.
What's happened is the money they have right now, and, the games they played to make more and more is collapsing. It wasn't real money.
The rich are the ones who will lose the most. But they are very mobile and now 'citizens of the world' so can pick up and move at any time.
The talk is Australia and New Zealand will be their next 'home' once they flock from the US.
TheAngryCanuck 2 years ago
goddammit cut your hair you look like you belong in a band from the mid 80s
olivermeeh 2 years ago
i'm 12 what is this?
DeathInFire777 2 years ago
Comment removed
jmm1233 2 years ago
i wouldn't call windows a big inovation , linux now theres an inovation :)
jmm1233 2 years ago
ope. spoke too soon hehehe
oldhacks 2 years ago
jeez, what a tosser
if he thinks that paying the same percentage is the definition of fair, doesn't it follow logically that all wages should also be equal? somehow i doubt he'd think that was fair. but wouldn't that be 'fair'? kinda sounds like communism to me.
gothatfunk 2 years ago
I appreciate the change in tone friend. this is good.
oldhacks 2 years ago
SEXY
ZeusSchultz 2 years ago
I preferred the picture of the woman in her underwear to be honest :)
BespokeGroupUK 2 years ago