those wind turbines were paid for by yorkshire water as they power the local treatment plant which services a large part of the surrounding area. I agree, Bloom is a leg end!
The depletion of human sources is a hoax! For example oil and coal are formed in the earth crust and at the bottom of ocean constantly, the physics at depths, which are not being educated to us, differ from what we know.
Elites have already powerful energy-sources in use, such as energy from lightning and also from tidal movement (not the poor projects they show us). Also powerful and clean motors exist and are working in hidden bases of the elite-forces.
Haaa, "can we all please wake up"!..Haahaa LMAO. Are you awake then mate?...are you sure?.....If you are, then you would be able too see that in another 5/10 years there wont be a life, as such, specially the life you lead! Lets agree on one fact, coal, oil, natural gas, minerals and so on, are in fact being depleted at an alarming rate, and these are non renewable! "Once there gone, there gone for good"!....and this will be our down fall. Only then will the sheeple see what they have done!
wind turbine...actually funny to see it doing nothing.. i thought this is the ufo one that got hit at first, but if its hot or cold it doesnt move, thats a brilliant observation and daft if your gonna wait for some power from it.. ha ha ha brilliant..im wide awake now thanks ha ha ha
And what kind of political agenda was it? Who benefits from an agenda of being more sensitive to environmental needs? Your political bias is clear. Do you really think that we can burn fossil fuel every hour of every day for the last 100+ years without any effect at all? You people just don't understand. Our children will pay for your ignorance.
Clean coal? I doubt it. I don't mean to alarm you, but have you noticed a rather large chorus of people who are worried about CO2 emissions? I know you'll be dead in 10-20 years, but your kids are going to have to deal with the effects of 100+ years of emissions and pollution. Hell of legacy to leave them, don't you think?
Economies can always be restructured. the environment, on the other hand, cannot be fixed so easily. The move towards green power is a necessary one because we cannot continue to burn fossil fuels with total abandon. It's ludicrous to think that we can emit co2 and pollutants every hour of every day for last 100+ years with little effect. Our lifestyles and economy may have to change somewhat, but that is far better than ignoring the problem.
The issue here is not whether or not you agree or disagree on CO2 levels and their effect and if 'Global warming' is man made or not. Is wind-power a feasible and cost effective way to make energy and is it actually as 'green' as they like to claim?
I'm sure that wind power has its problems but I think that it's a step in the right direction. It's kind of like hybrid cars; while they may not be a "green" as they claim, they are evidence that times are a changing. It just makes sense. I live in a place where coal is predominant power source, meaning I have the dirtiest electrical grid in my country. There needs to be a move towards reducing consumption coupled with cleaner sources of power.
Most greens are so narrow minded they will close down alternatives like clean coal and nuclear to suit their blinkered outlook. There are many new technologies on the horizon but pouring taxpayers money into wind-power is a waste, considering it could be put to much better use elsewhere.
There is no such thing as clean coal. And nuclear power leaves us with stockpiles of radioactive material that we have no idea what to do with. The stuff will outlast me, you, and your grandchildren's children. Where wind power doesn't leave a radioactive legacy, or have much of a carbon output. As wind/solar technology increases in efficiency and consumption levels off, hopefully the two will meet each other in the middle.
While you live in hope the lights start to go out. There's a new generation of micro nuclear plants just waiting to be built with minimal problems with decommissioning.
He is grasping at straws here. The wind turbines are allocated so that they can catch/get the winds coming form different directions. Hence, sometime one works and the other does not, and the other way around.
-8 here last night, and no wind. It wouldn't matter which direction you pointed the damn thing in. Anyway, our coldests winds are easterly, which are least common. So how many turbines will be turning when we need them?
Coal and nuclear are subsidised far more then wind . . . and you can store energy. What are you going to do next complain that tidal gives use too much energy during the rush hour?
Yes they are facts! Clean coal simple costs too much the same is true for nuclear power which also emits high amounts of CO2 (about 40% per unit of energy in comparison to oil, in the UK), as well as other harmful chemicals. There is not one Nuclear power plant that has been made without government subsidies, as it is not financially viable in a free market.
Personally I'd prefer to first stop the flow of money going into the deeply corrupt EU departments and its globalistic plans for a NWO.
Let people have their windmills and PV cells if they want them. The main problem is our overconsumption (too taxing for a healthy living environment) and our deep ignorance (mass psychosis / consensus trance).
no we can't because solar and wind doesnt sell any coal or oil for the sake of making rich big industrialists even richer. you should look up the channel "Free Global Energy" and watch the 26 part playlist he got on his profil
:) now I understand T BOONE PICKENS advertisement here does not tell you that hhhhhhmmmmmmmm maybe we could use electricity to keep them going when there is no wind :) thanks I enjoyed this.
Great message, unfortunately your message is drowned out by the WIND hitting microphone. A nice twist to the message would be that there is some wind out here but either its not enough to move that beast or it doesn't move on purpose just to throw money away as it is a show of force on EU laws on British soil.
AWESOME!!!!
mallardhead 1 year ago
Couldn't have said it better Mr bloom, one of the few people in politics who is sane!
jrdesignco 1 year ago
Godfrey Bloom is off his nut. He lives in a parallel reality to the rest of us.
Anyone can spout simplistic and angry bullshit about anything. Doesn't make them right though.
williamofnormal 2 years ago
Which reality are you in?
ukipwebmaster 1 year ago
Er....if the wind isn't blowing, why can we hear wind in the background of the video, interrupting the sound quality??
ihateiainlee 2 years ago
If the wind was blowing and it couldn't turn the turbine; what does that say???
ukipwebmaster 2 years ago
Dunno! Maybe that Mr Bloom isn't working hard enough to turn all that hot air he spouts in the right direction?
ihateiainlee 2 years ago
those wind turbines were paid for by yorkshire water as they power the local treatment plant which services a large part of the surrounding area. I agree, Bloom is a leg end!
MrRoggaB 2 years ago
So they were paid for by the customers of Yorkshire water along with the taxpayers nationally who have to subsidise this sort of energy generation.
What happens when the wind stops? Do people get a backlog of sewage?
ukipwebmaster 2 years ago
Godfrey Bloom is a legend does alf make me laugh and always has such good points.
loveEUROPEhateEU 2 years ago
Meanwhile we are pushed into a fear-complex, which is in fact an illusion and a complete loss of rational and emotional human energy!
The good of Mr. Bloom is that he is pointing out that authorities act precisely into the wrong direction and precisely THEY are causing the damage!!!
SaharaForce 2 years ago
The depletion of human sources is a hoax! For example oil and coal are formed in the earth crust and at the bottom of ocean constantly, the physics at depths, which are not being educated to us, differ from what we know.
Elites have already powerful energy-sources in use, such as energy from lightning and also from tidal movement (not the poor projects they show us). Also powerful and clean motors exist and are working in hidden bases of the elite-forces.
All is being hidden for us.
SaharaForce 2 years ago
Haaa, "can we all please wake up"!..Haahaa LMAO. Are you awake then mate?...are you sure?.....If you are, then you would be able too see that in another 5/10 years there wont be a life, as such, specially the life you lead! Lets agree on one fact, coal, oil, natural gas, minerals and so on, are in fact being depleted at an alarming rate, and these are non renewable! "Once there gone, there gone for good"!....and this will be our down fall. Only then will the sheeple see what they have done!
skunkace 2 years ago
Lol, even the Green party agrees that nuclear power is the only solution now.
Independence4Britain 2 years ago 3
Wind turbines= an eye sore, waste of space and many oppose it.
ukburger 2 years ago 3
nuclear power is the furture!
LukePhillipsWINS 3 years ago
wind turbine...actually funny to see it doing nothing.. i thought this is the ufo one that got hit at first, but if its hot or cold it doesnt move, thats a brilliant observation and daft if your gonna wait for some power from it.. ha ha ha brilliant..im wide awake now thanks ha ha ha
crimsoncoin 3 years ago
The global warming fraud is unravelling. It is now shown that the planet has now COOLED since 1998.
But don't tell that to the politically correct enviro-rads, as the "debate is over."
Their agenda wasn't nvironmental idealism to begin with; it was political and economic.
alogmail 3 years ago
And what kind of political agenda was it? Who benefits from an agenda of being more sensitive to environmental needs? Your political bias is clear. Do you really think that we can burn fossil fuel every hour of every day for the last 100+ years without any effect at all? You people just don't understand. Our children will pay for your ignorance.
Chemicalogic 3 years ago
Yeah...we'll have to shut down the volcanoes.
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
whatever.
Chemicalogic 3 years ago
I agree 100%
jme1976 3 years ago
Clean coal? I doubt it. I don't mean to alarm you, but have you noticed a rather large chorus of people who are worried about CO2 emissions? I know you'll be dead in 10-20 years, but your kids are going to have to deal with the effects of 100+ years of emissions and pollution. Hell of legacy to leave them, don't you think?
Chemicalogic 3 years ago
I think the legacy they will have is living under the economic effects of loony green policies, don't you think?
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
Economies can always be restructured. the environment, on the other hand, cannot be fixed so easily. The move towards green power is a necessary one because we cannot continue to burn fossil fuels with total abandon. It's ludicrous to think that we can emit co2 and pollutants every hour of every day for last 100+ years with little effect. Our lifestyles and economy may have to change somewhat, but that is far better than ignoring the problem.
Chemicalogic 3 years ago
The issue here is not whether or not you agree or disagree on CO2 levels and their effect and if 'Global warming' is man made or not. Is wind-power a feasible and cost effective way to make energy and is it actually as 'green' as they like to claim?
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
I'm sure that wind power has its problems but I think that it's a step in the right direction. It's kind of like hybrid cars; while they may not be a "green" as they claim, they are evidence that times are a changing. It just makes sense. I live in a place where coal is predominant power source, meaning I have the dirtiest electrical grid in my country. There needs to be a move towards reducing consumption coupled with cleaner sources of power.
Chemicalogic 3 years ago
Most greens are so narrow minded they will close down alternatives like clean coal and nuclear to suit their blinkered outlook. There are many new technologies on the horizon but pouring taxpayers money into wind-power is a waste, considering it could be put to much better use elsewhere.
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
There is no such thing as clean coal. And nuclear power leaves us with stockpiles of radioactive material that we have no idea what to do with. The stuff will outlast me, you, and your grandchildren's children. Where wind power doesn't leave a radioactive legacy, or have much of a carbon output. As wind/solar technology increases in efficiency and consumption levels off, hopefully the two will meet each other in the middle.
Chemicalogic 3 years ago
While you live in hope the lights start to go out. There's a new generation of micro nuclear plants just waiting to be built with minimal problems with decommissioning.
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
did he film this himself, or did someone hold the camera for him?
12tod 3 years ago
We could get the MEP's from Brussels to turn a big cog which produces energy for Britain?
Put them all to some good use (:
Binfieldius 3 years ago
He is grasping at straws here. The wind turbines are allocated so that they can catch/get the winds coming form different directions. Hence, sometime one works and the other does not, and the other way around.
He is dead wrong on this, in my own opinion.
agfigueroaa 3 years ago 2
So they are even less efficient from a very low base to begin with?
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
it depends on the Kw/$.
agfigueroaa 3 years ago
-8 here last night, and no wind. It wouldn't matter which direction you pointed the damn thing in. Anyway, our coldests winds are easterly, which are least common. So how many turbines will be turning when we need them?
OccupyingSpirit 3 years ago
Coal and nuclear are subsidised far more then wind . . . and you can store energy. What are you going to do next complain that tidal gives use too much energy during the rush hour?
blaiko 3 years ago
"Coal and nuclear are subsidised far more then wind" Facts?
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
Yes they are facts! Clean coal simple costs too much the same is true for nuclear power which also emits high amounts of CO2 (about 40% per unit of energy in comparison to oil, in the UK), as well as other harmful chemicals. There is not one Nuclear power plant that has been made without government subsidies, as it is not financially viable in a free market.
blaiko 3 years ago 2
Come back when the lights go out
ukipwebmaster 3 years ago
A subsidised product that delivers the goods is better than a subsidised product that doesn't. Not everybody believes in the eco religion.
HarryBallbag 3 years ago
alot of truth in that video - thanks
ReptilianOverlord 3 years ago
Personally I'd prefer to first stop the flow of money going into the deeply corrupt EU departments and its globalistic plans for a NWO.
Let people have their windmills and PV cells if they want them. The main problem is our overconsumption (too taxing for a healthy living environment) and our deep ignorance (mass psychosis / consensus trance).
Selasia 3 years ago
no we can't because solar and wind doesnt sell any coal or oil for the sake of making rich big industrialists even richer. you should look up the channel "Free Global Energy" and watch the 26 part playlist he got on his profil
happosai21 3 years ago
:) now I understand T BOONE PICKENS advertisement here does not tell you that hhhhhhmmmmmmmm maybe we could use electricity to keep them going when there is no wind :) thanks I enjoyed this.
deanna777777777777 3 years ago
Great message, unfortunately your message is drowned out by the WIND hitting microphone. A nice twist to the message would be that there is some wind out here but either its not enough to move that beast or it doesn't move on purpose just to throw money away as it is a show of force on EU laws on British soil.
Deoptics8 3 years ago
Good old Godders
harryaldridge 3 years ago