Oh my goodness... does Anne Estabrook even know her own positions on things? This isn't tough stuff... where do you stand on the issues? She had to go to her notes to find out what she believes? Way to go, Murray!
I would vote for Sabrin. The bottom line is we need the right to arm ourselves against Foreign and Domestic enemies, which are both Criminals if they are harming you without rational and legal cause. If our own gov becomes a dictatorship we must have arms to cause an ajustment back to our basic Law, the Constitution.
Are you all kidding me? Sabrin is your best choice? Why would you pick a candidate that can't win because he's nuts? He's run twice and no one even today knows who he is - for good reason. Look at Senator Lautenberg's record and make an educated decision before choosing between two GOP candidates that are completely oblivious. You have an excellent choice in NJ with your current Senator who has done more than anyone realizes for all of you...
She had to look back at the papers for her gun position, whereas Sabrin hit that one out of the park referencing his father's liberation using a firearm.
She looks like a deer caught in the headlights on these two issues. She will be a pawn in the hands of the masters in Washington.. Please fellow patriots give to Mr Sabrin's candidacy.
Murray Sabrin is a patriot and a scholar. He made Anne Estabrook look plain silly here.
I'm sorry but if you need to refer to notes to see what your position is on an issue - especially as important as the 2nd amendment - you have no business running for Senate.
It would have been awesome if Sabrin said "you know, sometimes I have to look at a piece of paper to see where I stand on the issues too, except I look at the CONSTITUTION!"
Food for thought from leftie Michael Kinsley today, on "the surge"; "..consider how modest the administration's standard of success has become. Can there be any doubt that they would go for a reduction to 100,000 troops—and claim victory—if they had any confidence at all that the gains they brag about would hold at that level of support? The proper comparison isn't to the situation a year ago. It's to the situation before we got there. Imagine that you had been told in 2003 that when George W..
Bush finished his second term, dozens of American soldiers & hundreds of Iraqis would be dying violently every month; that a major American goal would be getting the Iraqi government to temper its "de-Baathification" campaign so that Saddam Hussein's former henchmen could start running things again (because they know how); and "only" 100,000 American troops would be needed to sustain this equilibrium. You might have several words to describe this situation, but success would not be one of them."
She's human and wanted to confirm what she meant. When one word can place a sentence out of context one cannot be too careful. If she misspoke, then this would have been about how she misspoke or changed her position.
I guess she should have been a better robot.
It's good to double checks things before blurting out garbage for us to consume, rather than stuff that they don't believe, just so they can get elected.
Well, if that's all he has to go up against, good grief ... pro-choice catholic ... individual right "as opposed to what?" duh ... any Ron Paul supporter could run circles around that lady.
Only law abiding people follow laws. Laws that restrict gun ownership penalize law abiding people and therefore put them at a disadvantage to criminals who don't care what the law is. Therefore a government that enforces such restrictions is aiding criminals. What's new? Is Anne Estabrook a real candidate??? That she is a catholic and also pro-choice is so Rudy Guiliani! You cannot be catholic and be out-of-step with the pope on this matter. You are not a real catholic Anne! Helloooo? Helloooo?
Watching Anne Estabrook just now scared the crap out of me. Seriously, I have chills. This woman could very well be elected and she is clueless: and this is for Senate! It just goes to show you how our lives are run by the same ignoramuses that annoy you at the grocery store or who spew inanities at church or school. These people get molded with talking points once they reach Washington and become the Ted Kennedys and Nancy Pelosis of the future. God help us...
Awesome. Murray Sabrin is the intelligent person's choice for Senate. If you prefer a hypocritical, meandering, cafeteria Catholic, then vote for her.
i don't know what makes me more freaked out. the possibility that she has to read off a piece of paper to figure out what she believes in. or the possibility she's for so many gun grabbin restrictions that she can't even remember them all. what a dumb biatch.
This Anne Estabrook wench just shows how far the Republican party has strayed from what it used to stand for. Gun control and government sponsored abortions? I guess its the same people that picked McCain as the front runner for president. The party is screwed if this BS keeps up. I guess we deserve to lose to the democrats when we make choices like this.
I want to say 'unbelievable' that your unsavory 'opponent' (more like speedbump) had to thumb through notes for so long to know what her position is on the right to bear arms, but it really isn't. What IS unbelievable, though, is that Congress is almost entirely populated by people like that character. Take 'em down, Murray! I'm awaiting all your filibusters!
One other guy for the Republican primary - Joe Pennacchio, a relative unknown. They're going up against an 84 year old Democrat in the general. He's not disliked, but most people want him out. Historically the polls have underestimated his support, though.
Jesus, what a stupid bitch. Go to hell, anne.
mikejackson4ever 2 years ago
Oh my goodness... does Anne Estabrook even know her own positions on things? This isn't tough stuff... where do you stand on the issues? She had to go to her notes to find out what she believes? Way to go, Murray!
thelittlebard 3 years ago
Everyone look up Joe Pennacchio's fascist manifesto on Google
TheFreedomRevolution 3 years ago
I love how she had to look through her "papers."
That's the fake establishment Republican for you.
mynamewastakentoo 3 years ago 4
She's a retard and dropped out. Ignore her and support the good doctor.
mynamewastakentoo 3 years ago 2
Notice not once does she EVER say supporting the 2nd amendment, just restrictions.
fantacmet 3 years ago 3
SARBIN PERIOD no Liberals
mwspruvn 3 years ago
she doesn't even know how to display her views on the 2nd amendment.
Stupid woman.
And screw people that are trying to take guns, thats tyranny
hleespartastic 3 years ago
Is she an idiot?? Who in the hell would put their money behind her? Wow.
mgilbo1 3 years ago
Couldn't remember three bullet-points about her stance on, no pun intended, the second amendment. Wow.
MooseOfReason 3 years ago 3
we need another money bomb for this man!
musicsheddcom 3 years ago
Sarbin looks like he knows this office well, she doesn't even know what she supports.
CCrossfan 3 years ago
in your face!
desertelite360 3 years ago
Anne Estabrook is a comic genius. This is hilarious!
mattfugazi 3 years ago
I would vote for Sabrin. The bottom line is we need the right to arm ourselves against Foreign and Domestic enemies, which are both Criminals if they are harming you without rational and legal cause. If our own gov becomes a dictatorship we must have arms to cause an ajustment back to our basic Law, the Constitution.
WhiskeyEchoFO 3 years ago
Are you all kidding me? Sabrin is your best choice? Why would you pick a candidate that can't win because he's nuts? He's run twice and no one even today knows who he is - for good reason. Look at Senator Lautenberg's record and make an educated decision before choosing between two GOP candidates that are completely oblivious. You have an excellent choice in NJ with your current Senator who has done more than anyone realizes for all of you...
vailjosh 3 years ago
Sabrin's got my vote!
jen472 3 years ago 4
She had to look back at the papers for her gun position, whereas Sabrin hit that one out of the park referencing his father's liberation using a firearm.
spazam 3 years ago 4
She looks like a deer caught in the headlights on these two issues. She will be a pawn in the hands of the masters in Washington.. Please fellow patriots give to Mr Sabrin's candidacy.
utubedaveg 3 years ago 9
/watch?v=5z0PkGGDS6E
TBRambo 3 years ago
I hope you all donate on February 29th.
murraysabrin(dot)com
paulfor08 3 years ago 2
Wow, Sabrin kicks ass, perhaps he's a good future pres. candidate for the future of the revolution!
Claytrainor 3 years ago 2
Murray, You Rock, my kinda guy!
Hope you win!
Aloha from Hawaii, USCVM (a proud Ron Paul supporter and supporter of like-minded statesmen and stateswomen)
UnderseaCaveman 3 years ago 5
Too bad Sabrin wasn't born in America, he could have made a good president.
CKYsibley 3 years ago 2
Still at Views: 2,327
Organjic 3 years ago 2
He kicks ass and I could see him running for prez even some day.
BIowback 3 years ago 3
Murray Sabrin is a patriot and a scholar. He made Anne Estabrook look plain silly here.
I'm sorry but if you need to refer to notes to see what your position is on an issue - especially as important as the 2nd amendment - you have no business running for Senate.
Go Murray, Go!
rbbo08 3 years ago 8
I felt somewhat sorry for her :)
Good show for Mr. Sabrin!
cherrielane 3 years ago 2
The intellectual gap between Estabrook and Murray is astonishing. She doesn't seem like she has a freakin'clue.
scholaroffreedom(DOT)com
jwilson770 3 years ago 2
This is how we will take back our country 1 seat at a time. Ron Paul Revolution has just begain, we must stick together.
wbradd3797 3 years ago 3
Um hold on...I seemed to have misplaced my opinion in this stack of papers...
erinmhughes 3 years ago 3
Goddamn youtube, the video stops 2 second before its over. Start a view count on this one!!!!
Views: 2,327
Organjic 3 years ago
Catholic and prochoice... following the direction of the church? WTF! LIAR!
Organjic 3 years ago
Estabrook = Neocon trash
secund2nun 3 years ago
She needed her lawyer.
NosePickingSob 3 years ago
Is she stoned?
JMannrdu 3 years ago 2
Go Mur-ray! Go Mur-ray! Go Mur-ray! You've got this chick down! She's a complete waste of space!
Good luck with the nomination!
lastnymleft 3 years ago 2
It would have been awesome if Sabrin said "you know, sometimes I have to look at a piece of paper to see where I stand on the issues too, except I look at the CONSTITUTION!"
afsafsdaf 3 years ago 2
That woman is a mindless bit of fluff. What in the world is she doing sharing a forum with Murray, or any other thinking human being?
-jcr
NSResponder 3 years ago
Murray is the real deal.
I laughed so hard that she had to look up her position.
Omnis2 3 years ago 2
Food for thought from leftie Michael Kinsley today, on "the surge"; "..consider how modest the administration's standard of success has become. Can there be any doubt that they would go for a reduction to 100,000 troops—and claim victory—if they had any confidence at all that the gains they brag about would hold at that level of support? The proper comparison isn't to the situation a year ago. It's to the situation before we got there. Imagine that you had been told in 2003 that when George W..
mpolzkill 3 years ago
Bush finished his second term, dozens of American soldiers & hundreds of Iraqis would be dying violently every month; that a major American goal would be getting the Iraqi government to temper its "de-Baathification" campaign so that Saddam Hussein's former henchmen could start running things again (because they know how); and "only" 100,000 American troops would be needed to sustain this equilibrium. You might have several words to describe this situation, but success would not be one of them."
mpolzkill 3 years ago
Mr. Sabrin, I will be supporting you for the U.S. Senate.
manueltoni 3 years ago
We all know the militia is the government, since, of course, the government would NEED TO BE REMINDED TO NOT DISARM ITSELF! NOT!
libertyeconomics 3 years ago
Murray better win against this dimwit.
coachkemp34 3 years ago
MORE ROBOTS NEEDED...
She's human and wanted to confirm what she meant. When one word can place a sentence out of context one cannot be too careful. If she misspoke, then this would have been about how she misspoke or changed her position.
I guess she should have been a better robot.
It's good to double checks things before blurting out garbage for us to consume, rather than stuff that they don't believe, just so they can get elected.
PS. I voted Murray back for indie governor.
studmoose 3 years ago 2
I think she should know her basic views. If she believes something, she should know it. That is how I see it.
paulfor08 3 years ago
Well, if that's all he has to go up against, good grief ... pro-choice catholic ... individual right "as opposed to what?" duh ... any Ron Paul supporter could run circles around that lady.
yutube1000 3 years ago 3
Catholics are "pro-choice?" What does Fr. Frank Pavone say about Catholic doctrine and abortion?
See: l4l (dot) org/library/cathchoi.html
Scroll down to "Why is Catholicism opposed to abortion?" or read the entire article...
youcanmakeadifferenc 3 years ago 2
Only law abiding people follow laws. Laws that restrict gun ownership penalize law abiding people and therefore put them at a disadvantage to criminals who don't care what the law is. Therefore a government that enforces such restrictions is aiding criminals. What's new? Is Anne Estabrook a real candidate??? That she is a catholic and also pro-choice is so Rudy Guiliani! You cannot be catholic and be out-of-step with the pope on this matter. You are not a real catholic Anne! Helloooo? Helloooo?
prolifenyc 3 years ago 2
Yeah, without her notes she is totally clueless. Even with her notes she is a pretty dim bulb.
carcabe 3 years ago
Watching Anne Estabrook just now scared the crap out of me. Seriously, I have chills. This woman could very well be elected and she is clueless: and this is for Senate! It just goes to show you how our lives are run by the same ignoramuses that annoy you at the grocery store or who spew inanities at church or school. These people get molded with talking points once they reach Washington and become the Ted Kennedys and Nancy Pelosis of the future. God help us...
jpfromtally 3 years ago
Thank goodness she had her notes. Otherwise she might not have had any positions!
FlyingComic 3 years ago
If every here likes Murray Sabrin so much, then you should either join or start a new Murray Sabrin meetup group.
murraysabrin(dot)meetup(dot)com
paulfor08 3 years ago
Go Murray!!!!
d991 3 years ago
ha ha ha
yourtube20061 3 years ago
Awesome. Murray Sabrin is the intelligent person's choice for Senate. If you prefer a hypocritical, meandering, cafeteria Catholic, then vote for her.
glorifiedg79 3 years ago 5
i don't know what makes me more freaked out. the possibility that she has to read off a piece of paper to figure out what she believes in. or the possibility she's for so many gun grabbin restrictions that she can't even remember them all. what a dumb biatch.
jyakulis 3 years ago 3
wow, wish I lived in New Jersey so I could vote for this guy
afsafsdaf 3 years ago 2
does she even understand what pro choice and pro life is? does she even know the difference?
VoteYourConsience 3 years ago 2
That was painful to watch- is she really serious?
Go Murray!
Schmauey 3 years ago 4
lolol Murray owned her. she is not a republican by any standards
VoteYourConsience 3 years ago 6
This Anne Estabrook wench just shows how far the Republican party has strayed from what it used to stand for. Gun control and government sponsored abortions? I guess its the same people that picked McCain as the front runner for president. The party is screwed if this BS keeps up. I guess we deserve to lose to the democrats when we make choices like this.
Oh well.
quickmike 3 years ago 2
RingsideRevolution dot com
galacticwacko 3 years ago
Murray all the way!
Is that woman supposed to be a Republican??
Donate to Murray if you can, his response to the 2nd amendment is fantastic.
Amy31415 3 years ago 4
Glad to see that Murray's opponent has such solid beliefs in the second amendment. >_> [/sarcasm]
Vote for Murray save New Jersey and America!
tehScribbles 3 years ago 3
Do you really not know what you support without reading off a piece of paper?!
HYWT 3 years ago 2
What is wrong with Anne Estabrook?!? She has to check a piece of paper to see what she stands for?!? Does she even know why she is running?
Cleaner44 3 years ago 3
I want to say 'unbelievable' that your unsavory 'opponent' (more like speedbump) had to thumb through notes for so long to know what her position is on the right to bear arms, but it really isn't. What IS unbelievable, though, is that Congress is almost entirely populated by people like that character. Take 'em down, Murray! I'm awaiting all your filibusters!
ThinkShink 3 years ago
Aren't you running against other people too though? (not sure)
StormCommander 3 years ago
One other guy for the Republican primary - Joe Pennacchio, a relative unknown. They're going up against an 84 year old Democrat in the general. He's not disliked, but most people want him out. Historically the polls have underestimated his support, though.
HYWT 3 years ago
Is this lady serious?
DirtMcGirt77 3 years ago
she's so stupid
TBRambo 3 years ago
MURRAY RULES!!!
TBRambo 3 years ago
There is a Murray Sabrin moneybomb set to go off on February 29th.
scholaroffreedom(dot)com
Hopefully we can unseat Lautenberg in 2008!
paulfor08 3 years ago 4