But there's no point in making a cover version that sounds just like the original. Why faithfully recreate something that has already been done, and very damn well at that?
That's a perfectly fair point and not one that I am trying to dispute, I was merely stating that whilst I think that this is a very beautiful piece, it struggles to stand up to comparison to the original - in no way a failing because, as you say, the original is an exquisite song.
This has been flagged as spam show
you commenters below me why did you waste your time typing?
Genedancingmachine 6 months ago
A nice enough piece of music when considered separately but it destroys the ethereal quality that gives the original it's haunting, moving feel.
dempsi1997 2 years ago
But there's no point in making a cover version that sounds just like the original. Why faithfully recreate something that has already been done, and very damn well at that?
isolatedoddball 2 years ago
That's a perfectly fair point and not one that I am trying to dispute, I was merely stating that whilst I think that this is a very beautiful piece, it struggles to stand up to comparison to the original - in no way a failing because, as you say, the original is an exquisite song.
dempsi1997 2 years ago
Woah. Awesome.
sadmonsterclub 2 years ago