this is so informative. we've been duped and swindled to the nth degree by the oil production crooks for so long... all that damage to our beautiful planet so some people could get rich. the swindle continues
The first fuel used in engines was hydrogen not alchohol. But the truth about the use of alchohol is they way "they" want to do it is take from our food sources to raise the cost of food. Hydrogen is the better solution and/or any power that can come from water. Water is fully renewable unlike all the rest, you burn hydrogen/oxygen and you get water back. Google Genpax and see what in store for our future and/or the possibilities. No more fuel bills of any kind, now thats a true solution.
Hydrogen itself is not a fuel source. It is a method to store energy.
Food vs Fuel is a myth. (Get them to ask the wrong question, and the answer doesn't matter.) Cattle don't digest much of the starch from corn anyway, so fermenting the starch first let cattle gain more on the leftover DDG. The food supply actually increases. Alcohol is liquid solar energy, renewable, and recharges the local economy. David Blume shows 20 better feedstocks in his book, Alcohol Can Be a Gas.
Did you even look at the Genepax site? It already been done, why they aren't selling units is something I don't understand yet, but they have already made water a source of electrical energy. If you plant anything on the land that was used to produce food, you have taken from our food source in that the land is no longer used to grow food. End result higher food prices. Also look up Stanley Meyer, and Dr. Daniel Dingel. Rain water is free and it runs well on rain water. Now that's hard to top.
I disagree, still, on the food vs fuel fallacy. Even mesquite grown in the desert will yield fermentable fruit pods, in addition to buffalo gourds grown under the trees. It's non-arable land to start with, and you end up with energy AND animal feed afterwards. Let's talk kelp grown on nets in the ocean. Again, no land used, but more fuel and food results. Overall, there is no shortage of food in the world; typically it's a shortage of money or evil gov't. HHO is a downward energy spiral.
How do you get past the law of diminishing returns? You know, the part where it takes more electricity to produce hydrogen than you get back from it? Also how do you address the lack of storage space using hydrogen as a transportation fuel? Of course if you can solve the tank requirements and get a range over 300 miles per tank, then we could use methane, which requires NO electrical or fossil fuel input.
Take a look at my video of Stanley Meyer and in the right hand corner there is a site address that will take you to the key of how Stanley Meyer did what he did. The site is energeticfourm. There I go over how the water for fuel technology works.
Another one of Rockefeller's ingenious coups was to donate millions of gas lamps to the populations of China and ended up selling them oil for generations to come racking up millions of $s.
Good marketing. :-) Giving away the razors to sell the blades. Railroads would give away land to settlers knowing there would be timber/livestock/crops to sell in a future years.
Great information and Makes sense, only problem is that in order to get people to watch this you are going to have to have some zippy graphics and/or more shock value to liven up things as the average tuber has a short attention span and probably will get bored after 20 seconds. Sad but true.
Yes and no. Rockefeller did fund the Prohibition agitators to tighten up his market for oil. Our addiction came later. I guess if we'd had alcohol fuel available all these years we'd be using cars just as much, perhaps more so, since the fuel would be cheaper.
Where is PART 2?
Geothermal is our ticket out of the petrofool mess. Electric everything, powered and re-charged by geothermal power. There'd be no pollution.
stopdemockery 6 months ago
This is my fav show, can't wait until it is back I just caught up online at seevstreaming (.) com
nullquible90 1 year ago
Excellent series. Would've been easier to follow if the videos were numbered so one could watch them in order.
CahKwainaUna 1 year ago
When will it be o.k. to hang some of these rockefellers in the public square?
After a fair trial...of course.
smujismuj 1 year ago
this is so informative. we've been duped and swindled to the nth degree by the oil production crooks for so long... all that damage to our beautiful planet so some people could get rich. the swindle continues
MrBuckwilliam 1 year ago
Wind car...is here...on you tube. Check it out.
Creatorisintherain 3 years ago
The first fuel used in engines was hydrogen not alchohol. But the truth about the use of alchohol is they way "they" want to do it is take from our food sources to raise the cost of food. Hydrogen is the better solution and/or any power that can come from water. Water is fully renewable unlike all the rest, you burn hydrogen/oxygen and you get water back. Google Genpax and see what in store for our future and/or the possibilities. No more fuel bills of any kind, now thats a true solution.
h2opower 3 years ago
Hydrogen itself is not a fuel source. It is a method to store energy.
Food vs Fuel is a myth. (Get them to ask the wrong question, and the answer doesn't matter.) Cattle don't digest much of the starch from corn anyway, so fermenting the starch first let cattle gain more on the leftover DDG. The food supply actually increases. Alcohol is liquid solar energy, renewable, and recharges the local economy. David Blume shows 20 better feedstocks in his book, Alcohol Can Be a Gas.
Cheers!
heyerstandards 3 years ago 3
Did you even look at the Genepax site? It already been done, why they aren't selling units is something I don't understand yet, but they have already made water a source of electrical energy. If you plant anything on the land that was used to produce food, you have taken from our food source in that the land is no longer used to grow food. End result higher food prices. Also look up Stanley Meyer, and Dr. Daniel Dingel. Rain water is free and it runs well on rain water. Now that's hard to top.
h2opower 3 years ago
I disagree, still, on the food vs fuel fallacy. Even mesquite grown in the desert will yield fermentable fruit pods, in addition to buffalo gourds grown under the trees. It's non-arable land to start with, and you end up with energy AND animal feed afterwards. Let's talk kelp grown on nets in the ocean. Again, no land used, but more fuel and food results. Overall, there is no shortage of food in the world; typically it's a shortage of money or evil gov't. HHO is a downward energy spiral.
heyerstandards 3 years ago
How do you get past the law of diminishing returns? You know, the part where it takes more electricity to produce hydrogen than you get back from it? Also how do you address the lack of storage space using hydrogen as a transportation fuel? Of course if you can solve the tank requirements and get a range over 300 miles per tank, then we could use methane, which requires NO electrical or fossil fuel input.
AuCinaoaMie 3 years ago
Take a look at my video of Stanley Meyer and in the right hand corner there is a site address that will take you to the key of how Stanley Meyer did what he did. The site is energeticfourm. There I go over how the water for fuel technology works.
h2opower 3 years ago
Another one of Rockefeller's ingenious coups was to donate millions of gas lamps to the populations of China and ended up selling them oil for generations to come racking up millions of $s.
aragee 3 years ago
Good marketing. :-) Giving away the razors to sell the blades. Railroads would give away land to settlers knowing there would be timber/livestock/crops to sell in a future years.
heyerstandards 3 years ago
Great information and Makes sense, only problem is that in order to get people to watch this you are going to have to have some zippy graphics and/or more shock value to liven up things as the average tuber has a short attention span and probably will get bored after 20 seconds. Sad but true.
johndude 3 years ago
but won't people who smelled the smoke of engine powered by alchohol will eventaully be drunk, now I'm just being sarcastic?
wel2myworld 3 years ago
so, what he just said that rockafellar is to blame w/ u.s.a. obsession with gas
wel2myworld 3 years ago
Yes and no. Rockefeller did fund the Prohibition agitators to tighten up his market for oil. Our addiction came later. I guess if we'd had alcohol fuel available all these years we'd be using cars just as much, perhaps more so, since the fuel would be cheaper.
heyerstandards 3 years ago 2