Rings of Energy - Spin Forces - Magnetic Observations and Mainstream Misconceptions Part 1

[TheNeokorben]

THANK YOU FOR THE EFFORT DUDE,KEEP DOING WHAT YOU DOING AND DON'T LISTEN TO NO BODY TRYING TO PUT YOU DOWN ,YOU HAVE THE SPIRIT OF GOOD RESEARCHER,MAY BE YOU WILL GET A BREAKTHROUGH ONE DAY

[TheRealVerbz]

@TheNeokorben Thank YOU! That breakthrough came 3 weeks ago my friend.

Please take a look at my newest radio interview to discus what a Magnet IS and WHY:

watch?v=HC2tJn0OLG0

There is a hidden code according the the Mayans and Egyptian Hieroglyphics that I finally solved after 6 years of research.

LOTS to discuss.

Facebook,com/Verbelli

Also take a look at the videos I've posted in the last month on my page!

watch?v=v6L-PsfvgEg

[vormanator]

This Video Reminded ME That I Didn't Finish MY COFFEE...lol

[blulander1969]

12:12 ish is that the diamagnetism at play and does it stay upright if you turn it 180 degrees ? Oh and where did you get your clear hemisphere ? :-)

[TheRealVerbz]

@blulander1969 Yes, that's diamagnetism. The copper will stay in a centripetal spin which ever way you spin it. But the magnetic ball will ALWAYS flip to North.. IN A CONCAVE SURFACE.

Doesn't do that on a flat plane. And there are no flat planes in the universe. Everything is ultimately a curve when you really go to investigate.

I got the hemispheres from a used security cam. It was the cover for the lens.

Like the hemispheres that cover cameras in stores, casinos or banks.

:o)

[Peterwhitlock]

WOW a lot of play and nothing at all new in any way shape or form... it was a whole waste of my time. Absolutely nothing new and all old stuff I knew as a kid. Are people Impressed with this NOTHING to offer stuff?

[TheRealVerbz]

@Peterwhitlock You must be much more informed than 90% of others because most people have not encountered the discoveries I've made with magnets, or other researchers like Ed Leedskalnin, Walter Russell, Viktor Schauberger, etc.

Take a look at the information in the video description and I GUARANTEE you'll find something you've never encountered.

Playing is how we discover.

You'd like the information I have in the description given we have the same attitude about Michio Kaka.

[blulander1969]

@Peterwhitlock “The key to wisdom is knowing all the right questions.” – John Simone without experimentation "PLAYING" we learn nothing new, nor can we understand the theory without the practical :-) PEACE

[LibertyTreeBud]

Keep feeding those brain cells, you're doing good. Thanks

[fuelban]

this is the basics of applied mechanics, the force will try and often succeed in moving the spinning object up, never down, provided the object is not held ridged, doing so to elevate force before critical collapsing of the materials structure, {conservation of self. in this case material), it can be seen put in to practice & working in Victorian steam engines.. self governing speed mechanisms. more recently in a bendex, in you're car, ( the starter motor) same principles

Thom in Scotland.

[fuelban]

you got it in the last few mins of your video... I will point you to look at explosion (Google it) thousands of explanations "Read them"... NOW point you to "Implosion" (goggle it) No explanations, here is your answer guy, comprehend this, "Implosion", and it becomes evident... but dangerous.... LOL...

Thom in Scotland.

[fuelban]

these are some of the best informative experiments I have seen recently guy, well done, and keep trucking, we are all just diggers for the gold of understanding.. nice 1, hope to see more ...

Thom in Scotland.

[fuelban]

At 05:36 ...You are viewing a magnetic force as a timeLinear force, it is not, it is a built action of microscopic force lines of tinny gyroscopic units, I have no other words of descriptive to use than this so...

Thom in Scotland.

[fuelban]

boy have you activated a hornets nest of comments..LOL..Good luck Daniel who dare to stand alone... But hey hey guy, does a spinning object not specifically cling to its central fulcrum, ? here might be you're answer. the opposite is occurring from the expected. I do see your reasoning & it makes perfect sense to me, however, there is a missing element in your reasoning. I see a particular common denominator in all of this, it crosses All & Binds all. 1 missing element here.

Thom in Scotland.

[tenkosami]

I'm looking through your channel so I don't know if you've already done so, but... can you make a sketch of what causes the tuning fork to spin when you guide the spherical magnet around the semisphere? I'm a visual kind of person, would need to see how the forces work to understand them. I will keep an eye on your channel, will subscribe. Also, thanks for making these videos. =)

[TheRealVerbz]

@tenkosami The tuning fork spins because the magnet is on a curved surface. If you try the same motion on a flat table, the tuning fork won't spin.

All direction is curved and all motion is spiral in reality and if you follow those natural rules, things will spin while they move instead of meeting resistance.

I'll try to make a sketch or some visual example to further elaborate that effect. I wanted to show more of that but no one seemed to notice it other than yourself.

:o)

[Mannycom420]

@TheRealVerbz have you herd of Ed leedskalnin? and Coral Castle? prolly lol this is what has been hidden for century's imo so basic and simple yet it so powerful at the same time...all things,even chalkra...i hope some people can learn the books are definitely wrong on the dynamics of Magnitism and Charges! if you put a cylinder magnet in a plasma field it will rotate the plasma at high speed L or R , weather N or S is in the field! because the M field is moving not static Peace!

[TheRealVerbz]

@Mannycom420 See the information in the video description! I'm very aware of Leedskalnin's work.

I LOVE all this stuff.

There's so much to share and discover it's absolutely amazing.

Add me on Facebook,com/Verbelli if you have a page.

Check out my photo albums, notes, comments and all that stuff.

:o)

--Jason

[tenkosami]

I have to say that I can't understand or acknowledge any of your theory regarding positive versus negative energy. However, what you show in this video - the tuning fork - is mind-boggling. I can't imagine what would cause the tuning fork to rotate as you move the magnet around the semisphere. Clearly, there is something going on with magnetism that most people are not aware of, otherwise there would be an explanation for this activity.

[GHOSTTOYS]

the first part is interesting but the second with the paper clip is funny because have you tough of induction .. i meant that is a metal bar or rod or event a paper clip can get magnetise so it becaume a magnet so to the paper clip got pole now ..

[TheRealVerbz]

@GHOSTTOYS It's the fact that the Blosch Wall repels the metal while the poles attract. Only certain alignments can attract while others repel. Regardless if the paperclip has poles, the center of the clip will be repelled by the Bloch wall which is positive pressure. The poles are negative pressure. Positive pressure repels and negative pressures attract.

[ppllbjw]

wow, so in regard to the your last comment Jason....is a helicopters without blades possible? have pple created magnets and devices that can wobble the magnetic field and fly?

[TheRealVerbz]

@ppllbjw It's not only possible, but it's been achieved already. That's what the military calls ARVs or Alien Reproduction Vehicles. They used to call them Levity Disks which was originally John Searl's technology, the IGV (Inverse Gravity Vehicle).

You can use a bunch of explosive energy to achieve lift via aerodynamics and be subject to the laws of physics, or you can use implosive energy to achieve lift via magnetodynamics and electrostatics at which point you bypass all so called Laws.

[ppllbjw]

@TheRealVerbz Thanks for answering the neophyte questions! I appreciate it because I don't have a science background and I'm wanting to learn!

[emmon72cz3x]

@TheRealVerbz You have discovered a 3 dimensional compass. You are a genius, my friend. Oh, wait. The Chinese beat you by about 2,200 years!

[TheRealVerbz]

@emmon72cz3x I'm just going from what I interpret from Egyptian Hieroglyphics. Some Chinese technology came from Egypt. There's nothing new under the Sun as they say. Bringin back the ancient knowledge! hahaa

[ActiveStorage]

what hemisphere do u live in? Northern one i assume? Can u travel to the southern hemesphere or finding ppl who live in the southern hemisphere and ask them to do the "spinning spherical magnet in a bowl" experiment there? Wonder if the sphere's +\- direction will switch

[TheRealVerbz]

@ActiveStorage It doesn't matter where you are on the globe, where you are in space, etc. A magnetic field and spin forces are isolated to the system generating them.

I'm near San Francisco in North America. The Coreolis Force has no effect on magnetism whatsoever. Magnetism IS gravity. Coreolis Force is inertia. Magnetism doesn't experience inertia because it's a wave.

:oD

[ActiveStorage]

@TheRealVerbz alright, gonna check out ur new vids then

ps

i didnt mean coreolis force when talked about hemispheres.. i meant electromagnetic poles of our planet and how they divide it into 2 hemispheres. There is got to be some form of interaction between ur neodymium sphere and the earth's magnetic field

cheers

[TheRealVerbz]

@ActiveStorage The mass making up the magnet is positive polarity or high pressure potential.

Like Pressure seeks like pressure. So a bubble will rise to equalize just like a rock sinks to equalize pressure.

Gravity is pressure. Alleviate the pressure by canceling out the frequencies and you have inverse gravity.

All bodies are inherently weightless.

The interaction of the neodymium magnet and the Earth's field are 2 separate forces. Both are isolated fields. Spin the magnet = repel from Earth.

[TheRealVerbz]

@TheRealVerbz This is the difference between aerodynamics and magnetodynamics. Birds fly, bees levitate. You can create a gyroscopic electric wave by spinning the blades of a helicopter. You will be subject to the laws of thermodynamics, inertia, time, etc.

But if you angle a magnet and spin it.... it creates like a magnetic helicopter blade that cuts through the Aether. Lift is created by wobbling the magnetic field around you which repels all inertia, mass, gravity, etc.

[ActiveStorage]

@TheRealVerbz huh) thats new) will take me a while to get my head around what you've just wrote.

nevertheless thank u, and dont get stuck in a swamp of any kind of artificial constructs that our mind creates. Cause that's how we got to where we are now.

[emmon72cz3x]

@TheRealVerbz You have discovered a 3 dimensional compass. You are a genius, my friend. Oh, wait. The Chinese beat you by about 2,200 years!

[ActiveStorage]

i would put holoscience website in the description too. google electric universe if you are interested

[TheRealVerbz]

@ActiveStorage Also w w w,feandft,com The Electric Universe is included with the works of Walter Russell, DB Larson, Viktor Schauberger, Marcel Vogel, John Keely, Dr. Keshava Bhat, and so many more.

Also please see my newest videos.

:o)

[MLeonBridges]

Just wondering but I thought the reason the N side always wants to point up is because of the earth's magnetic field and the S side being attracted to the northern hemisphere. Also your negative/positive energy confused me a bit, If the energy at the poles is always negative then wouldn't poles of two magnets always attract even if its S to S or N to N?

[TheRealVerbz]

@MLeonBridges It gets confusing because there's a lot of things going on with a magnet and many different ways to look at it.

When 2 negatives collide, it creates a ring of positive. But when the 3 fields are connected, they become 1 magnet. (Trinity)

Polarity and magnetic current (flux) is not the same. What science calls polarity in many scenarios is actually magnetic current and equalizing of pressure potential.

[TheRealVerbz]

Imagine 2 bubbles in water rising 1 behind the other. The bottom bubble is chasing the 1 on top not because it's attracted to it, but because both bubbles seek to equalize pressure potential. Science observes 2 bubbles (magnets) and assumes they stack N S N S because opposites attract. It's an illusion of observation. In reality, both magnets are seeking to equalize pressure potential and are aligned relative to each other like bubbles rising or rocks sinking. Like pressure seeks like pressure.

[TheRealVerbz]

@TheRealVerbz Opposites Repel. Hold a basket ball underwater and it wants to rise. This is because the ball is negative pressure and wants to seek a negative pressure state. Under water is high pressure. If opposites attract, the basketball should be sink to the bottom of the pool.

North is constantly chasing South just as man is constantly chasing woman. Light chases dark. If light and dark were attracted, the entire universe would be grey. Pressure Potential is polarity which is directional.

[TheRealVerbz]

@TheRealVerbz So the 2 negatives on either side of a magnet are locked together from the magnetization process of making it. The 2 negatives seeking each other are like the top and bottom of a sphere trying to touch. As the poles gravitate to each other and the sphere oblates, there is a ring that forms along the equator. That ring is positive pressure.

So a magnet has Negatives on top and bottom with a ring of positive BUT the magnet has a North and South Pole which oppose each other.

[ParapaDrifter]

aint it the earths magnetism influencing the North orientation?

Also the wobble of the earth occasionally flips the poles..

cool shiz nonetheless... I could write a movie based on this stuff

[TheRealVerbz]

@ParapaDrifter There is some conflicting semantics and technicalities between Walter Russell's description and Ed Leedskalnin. Walter said the Earth is not a magnet, but Leedskalnin said it is. But their definition of magnet is different too. I have the comparing research on my facebook page and writings.

The Earth and ALL the planets are lined up perfectly to the Sun all the time like stacked magnets. N S N S N S.

No planet wobbles actually, that's an illusion of relative perception.

[TheRealVerbz]

@TheRealVerbz Look into Dr. Keshava Bhat

w w w.feandft,com/Dr.%20Bhat.htm

The quackademic explanation is that Earth wobbles 1 revolution on it's axis about every 26,000 years. The Vortex Sun Model explains the entire Solar System moves in a vortical trajectory like a snake moving in 3 dimensions not a flat plane. As the Solar Snake moves above or below the Galactic Ecliptic, it produces the illusion that the polar axis of our planet is wobbling if viewed only from an Earth bound perspective.

[TheRealVerbz]

@TheReal When seen from outside the Solar System the Solar Snake is creating the so-called wobble due to its vortical trajectory above and below the Galactic Ecliptic. A powerful mind can mentally image these processes and a space craft is not needed in order to gain this perspective. The Maya, Inca, Egyptians, Indians, etc all knew this and represented the Solar Force as Serpents or twin opposing vortexes.

The Precession of the Equinox should be called the Precession of the Ages of the Zodiac.

[ParapaDrifter]

@TheRealVerbz thats what is needed. artists for visualization. I can do a bit of 3D with blender. I should sit on my ass and do some visualizations. Not only from outside the solar system, showing how the planets are always aligned, are they? also, some visualizations on the surface of the earth, with a true starmap on the sky; it'll go along way to proving that the solar vortex model is feasible.

Haha, I'm starting to sound like you.

So, is it possible to model accurate movements to scale?

[TheRealVerbz]

@ParapaDrifter :oD All the visualizations are helpful! Please imagine and see what you come up with. The planets are always aligned just as the body of a snake is always aligned. The body of the snake may slither and parts of it seem out of alignment, but every slither and every ripple is still part of the serpent.

Just as the planets might not be in a straight line, but they're part of the galactic serpent and are perfectly aligned. The Sun is the head of the snake and the snake coils. (Helix)

[gedw99]

wow this was the best video i have seen in a while. The logic makes alot of sense and matches the evidence based approach.

The fact that when you align two N ends of a magnet and then repel is then because the vortex motion is causing the "friction" between then two and hence repelling. NOT because the top of North and the Bottom is south.

that actually makes sense. amazing and so simple

[MattBlytheTheOne]

In a magnet the electron spin is almost totally diametric to the atoms alignment which can be seen from the field lines and flux density, which cause the stronger centripetal attraction forces in a ferrous body (a conductor). The forces are present in other materials but because of their atomic "packing" it makes them bad for electron flow and the forces become negligent.

[TheRealVerbz]

@MattBlytheTheOne Hey Matt!

:oD

You're going to love my next few videos.

I'm going to need some help from a few people.

See my latest note on my Facebook page.

[MattBlytheTheOne]

Attraction in a magnet is the extent to which electrons in a body want to join the flow of electrons in a magnet.... which is increased by diametric electron spin. There is also a small magnetic force in a wire conductor for example but the electrons are (more or less) all moving along its path axially. (they actually spiral along it which causes the weak manetism). Likewise magnets always have a small electrical force evident. It just depends on the atoms electron spin alignment.

[MattBlytheTheOne]

Electron spin is difficult to explain in just a few words on YT but if you imagine elctrons flowing down a wire, then their axial spin is minimal, so the magnetic flux is minimal, but if they flow through a coiled wire then they create more magnetic flux due to the increase in diametric electron spin. In a "pure" magnet all the electron spin is diametic which creates a flow of elctrons from its centre to its poles causing the attraction forces (which is only weak in a wire). lol see I told you?

[MichaelSmathers]

FANTASTIC OBSERVATIONS!

[Beamshipcaptain]

Nice job, Jason!

[CliveSinclairZX]

This is fantastic! Thank you.

[CliveSinclairZX]

=) yay

[RunAMuckGirl2]

Oooo Oooo! Interesting!! Thank you!

[77GSlinger]

Excellent work! @2:30 the print is really difficult to read could you post it in the more info area please? You are definately on the high road friend. Walter Russell's Cosmology explains all of the great works created by the many great thinkers you quoted. This is the cutting edge of the new emerging paradigm which will free mankind from the energy barons, war mongers and control freaks, behind the wars and illegal monetary system, political corruption and rampant greed.

[TheRealVerbz]

@77GSlinger Works best on full screen.

:o)

Looks like this will be a 3 or 4 part video.

I've been discovering things by the hour now.

People REALLY need to look into the names I mentioned in the description and add me on Facebook,com/Verbelli

I can use all the insight I can get!

[77GSlinger]

@TheRealVerbz I am well versed in Russellian Science if you have any questions about twin opposing em vortices, cubic wave fields and spherical scalar systems, feel free to ask!

[thebigseahorse]

Thank you for your videos. great work!

[K0W0O0N0]

Great research and nice video!

THX for sharing this!

Cheers...