It seems to me that there is plenty of repetition in this piece when you look at it from a composers perspective, taking into consideration ideas like harmonic and rhythmic augmentation and diminution, inversion, retrograde patterns etc. which are techniques composers have been using for ages. I bet close examination of the score would reveal many hidden patterns.
The math involved in this composition is truly interesting, but something bothers me: although this concept of "ugly music" is entertaining, it's not useful to the development of new forms of listening and composing. It's sad enough that modern composition is so out of reach for the "common" people, and then the video implies that Schönberg was trying to write "ugly music". I know it's a joke, but if you're using high math concepts, use high musical concepts too and everybody is happy.
Scott Rickard has degrees in Mathematics, Computer Science, and Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and MA and PhD degrees in Applied and Computational Mathematics from Princeton University but can't do simple math or use a calculator.
@TaintedShirt 6 would have been closer to the truth, but in fairness the point i was making was that your argument is effectively like saying a minor typo makes you completely linguistically incompetent.
@DrGluteusMaximus First an incorrect accusation. Now a straw man! What next ?
I pointed out that someone with a lot of qualifications in a particular field can make a mistake in that field. I also pondered whether the tax man would allow me to make a mistake.
At no point did I call Prof Rickard incompetent. You may have inferred as much, but that doesn't mean I stated or implied it. I will admit I could have been nicer in how I pointed out his error.
Apparently, in thinking about repetition, they didn't take into consideration that the same tones in different octaves are a form of reiteration - albeit not 'pattern' repetition. The chromatic scale is not simply a set of discrete numbers, the chromatic scale on a piano is in fact itself a repetitive pattern. They should have mapped this onto 88 discrete frequencies that avoid these intervals.
Not well-written, but if he was going for "ugliest," he failed. Over a century ago, composers began seeking to do away with tonality and serializing pitches. This led to serialization of other elements of music. Aesthetically, this is no uglier than their efforts. Stockhausen himself said that music is not about the sound at the end, but the process of its creation. This man's ideas are not new, and in his case, they are also not well-executed. I've heard much uglier.
Its like mystical ambient by piano. Ugliest can't say it would be... there's lot of people who have made Ugliest music ever and they get even paid for it
I would not call this the world's ugliest music. I would call it the world's "most lacking in beauty" music. Really ugly music, I would think, would have a whole different set of (ugly) patterns of it's own.
@ahlmx6 That may be true, but the vibrations are completely different; and it's the vibrations that determine the structure of molecules that come into contact with them. String theory supports this.
@ahlmx6 Sure, metal has positive effects, it all depends on the individual song. All I know is that Emoto used a song that had vulgar lyrics and seeing water's reaction to just negative words and nothing else, the words probably did more damage than the music because words have a vibration too.
@Eowyn47 umm seriously? you think molecules knew they were "bad" words. you could say fudge, instead of fuck, with more bass and deeper vibrations. the shit prolly was caused because metal has double bass and deep vocals, if you took classical music and changed the notes to deeper notes it'd do the same thing. this study is completely invalid.
@ahlmx6 Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying, because repeatedly, time after time, positive words yielded strong hexagonal structures in the molecules, whereas negative words yielded no structure at all. The whole point of the study was to show that words, thoughts, and emotions affect us because they affect molecules, and we are made of molecules, including 70% water. This idea is not really that radical. If you do the research yourself, you will find similar findings worldwide.
@ahlmx6 Also, deeper vibrations do not necessarily make the molecular structure weaker, just like higher frequencies do not necessarily make the molecular structure stronger. It's much more complicated than that. Google the 528Hz frequency and you will get more information about this phenomenon. It's an example of a 'healing' frequency because doctors actually use this frequency to repair DNA. I expect water would react positively to that frequency, for example.
I wonder how water molecules would react to this music. Anyone who's familiar with Masaru Emoto's water experiments knows what I'm talking about. Basically, the molecules had a stronger structure when classical music was played for it, and a weak structure when heavy metal was played. Both kinds of music have a pattern though, so I wonder how water molecules would react to something with no pattern. Would it be neutral, or have a weak structure like the heavy metal? Someone should try this.
@Eowyn47 His experiments were nowhere near scientific and have never been reproduced. What is a "stronger structure" and a "weak structure"? Besides, the appeal of a particular pattern of an ice crystal is quite a subjective matter. No one should waste time trying this.
@batsali99 If you are familiar with his experiments, you should already know what constitutes a strong structure and a weak one. The strength of the structure is what is objective about his experiments. A strong structure is one that has a stable, hexagonal structure (like a complete snowflake). A weak structure is one that is disjointed or abnormal. You can easily tell the difference. And there are many other scientific experiments that support Emoto's results, ones not done by him.
@Eowyn47 Describe to me in detail the mechanism by which a bunch of water molecules, inanimate matter, can appreciate complex musical structure, understand any human language and choose to respond to what is said. From what I read, you have a mediocre grasp of science and common sense, at best! Try to explain how this bogus scientific experiment makes sense in your magical world. Thanks.
@batsali99 Scientists used to think that molecules were inanimate matter, but quantum physics has changed this. Matter is not dumb, matter is intelligent energy and that energy is constantly changing. If you are genuinely interested in the science behind it, I recommend you do some quantum physics research and read Dr. Emoto's book, 'The Hidden Messages in Water', which will give you more thorough answers than I can give in a YouTube comment with a character limit. Good luck!
That's definitely not the ugliest music, but I guess it's all a matter of one's opinion. My opinion is that I simply appreciate the fact that the music doesn't have a pattern or structure, although at some places, it kind of felt like it DID have a structure. I don't find it ugly or beautiful. It kind of just IS.
just out of curiosity... how is this different if you used Pi (3.14...)to determine the notes and Phi (the golden section 1.61...) as the timing? im pretty sure that pi and phi will go one with out making any patterns.
@wakojako49 I think that is because Pi has reptition in it's number. For example the number '1' occurs twice in the first four digits. He seems to be interested in repetition free score, not just pattern-less
@ChrisCummins mmm.... that's interesting. yeah i guess you're right. anyways its some thought i just thought about cause you know pi and phi are called irrational numbers because there is no repetition of patterns. :P
@AfroDeezeeYak eyes, nose, and mouth are in the same basic position. Plus one has an anatomical equivalent of everything the other has, and vice versa.
This research is very interesting, but there is a mistake in facts: Schoenberg tried to create music without repeats in _1910s_ [so called atonal music, i.e. op.16]. Then he discovered Dodecaphony (1920s, since op.25) and used repeats everywhere.
@Piglet0123456789 I agree. My thought was that there were elements of style producing a pattern. While the specific key press may be random, by translating the calculation to the piano utter randomness is lost.
Show! very good for "creative meditation"...please, don't let me feel alone...I feel like I'm different, as I loved that piece...not bad, really good excerpt!
The only bad thig is the idiot presenter... that's a piece of shit.
7:46 song starts here :) your welcome..
gomesmat 3 days ago
Baixaki?
gomesmat 3 days ago
wouldnt the pattern be this repeated over and over againnn
blackknight22w 4 days ago
I thought it was sort of pretty. It lets your imagination fill in the gaps. :)
Tekime 5 days ago in playlist Best of TEDxTalks
Here is a MP3 of the piece:
KcBZA 6 days ago
Justin Bieber
AlonsoRules 1 week ago
It seems to me that there is plenty of repetition in this piece when you look at it from a composers perspective, taking into consideration ideas like harmonic and rhythmic augmentation and diminution, inversion, retrograde patterns etc. which are techniques composers have been using for ages. I bet close examination of the score would reveal many hidden patterns.
Shunarjuna 1 week ago
I can definitely play this one :-)
ebruschi 1 week ago
The math involved in this composition is truly interesting, but something bothers me: although this concept of "ugly music" is entertaining, it's not useful to the development of new forms of listening and composing. It's sad enough that modern composition is so out of reach for the "common" people, and then the video implies that Schönberg was trying to write "ugly music". I know it's a joke, but if you're using high math concepts, use high musical concepts too and everybody is happy.
rafaelnelvam 2 weeks ago
Scott Rickard has degrees in Mathematics, Computer Science, and Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and MA and PhD degrees in Applied and Computational Mathematics from Princeton University but can't do simple math or use a calculator.
4:45 27 x 3 = 81 and 27 x 3 = 243.
Wonder if the tax man will accept this type of mathematics when I try to insist I have paid all my tax.
TaintedShirt 2 weeks ago
@TaintedShirt Don't confuse maths and arithmetic it's insulting.
DrGluteusMaximus 2 weeks ago
@DrGluteusMaximus Sheesh, I was wondering how to respond. I came up with a few options.
1) If you thought I was being insulting I am sorry you felt this way.
2) Arithmetic is a branch of maths. Check your definitions.
3) I could have posted to failblog if indeed I was going to be insulting.
4) I think you'd best not get upset so easily if you want to get by on the net.
5) Ignore
6) Troll
Option 1 won. I apologise if I upset you because of your inability to use a dictionary.
TaintedShirt 2 weeks ago
@TaintedShirt 6 would have been closer to the truth, but in fairness the point i was making was that your argument is effectively like saying a minor typo makes you completely linguistically incompetent.
DrGluteusMaximus 2 weeks ago
@DrGluteusMaximus First an incorrect accusation. Now a straw man! What next ?
I pointed out that someone with a lot of qualifications in a particular field can make a mistake in that field. I also pondered whether the tax man would allow me to make a mistake.
At no point did I call Prof Rickard incompetent. You may have inferred as much, but that doesn't mean I stated or implied it. I will admit I could have been nicer in how I pointed out his error.
TaintedShirt 2 weeks ago
@TaintedShirt :)
DrGluteusMaximus 2 weeks ago
Apparently, in thinking about repetition, they didn't take into consideration that the same tones in different octaves are a form of reiteration - albeit not 'pattern' repetition. The chromatic scale is not simply a set of discrete numbers, the chromatic scale on a piano is in fact itself a repetitive pattern. They should have mapped this onto 88 discrete frequencies that avoid these intervals.
kstallm 3 weeks ago 2
@kstallm I agree. I also noticed that too.
lelenina2 3 weeks ago
I liked it....
Gr4yW0rld 3 weeks ago in playlist Best of TEDxTalks
I've heard uglier.
AeolisticFury 3 weeks ago
I felt like I was falling down a hill
aldezmail 3 weeks ago 3
I don't know. I think I prefer Gould's interpretation.
xejerk 3 weeks ago in playlist Best of TEDxTalks 4
Sadly, this is not the worst piece of music I've ever heard. Go look up Gucci Mane, and you'll see what I mean LOL.
Iheartsmusic88 3 weeks ago in playlist Best of TEDxTalks
so this took second place to lady gaga right?
originalsoulshatter 3 weeks ago
Not well-written, but if he was going for "ugliest," he failed. Over a century ago, composers began seeking to do away with tonality and serializing pitches. This led to serialization of other elements of music. Aesthetically, this is no uglier than their efforts. Stockhausen himself said that music is not about the sound at the end, but the process of its creation. This man's ideas are not new, and in his case, they are also not well-executed. I've heard much uglier.
rstravis 3 weeks ago 3
Still better than dubstep
SeriousDrazhar 3 weeks ago 21
Music for the long walks on the sands of Arrakis.
arna11420 3 weeks ago
8:53 in - there are the two intervals that start the Godfather theme. B-)
PowerThirteen 3 weeks ago
@PowerThirteen I thought I heard that too!
DrGluteusMaximus 2 weeks ago
I liked it better than any of the rap music I've heard.
browser51 3 weeks ago 4
@browser51 you should stop listening to that shit and listen to some real rap.
mslvc2011 3 weeks ago
Its like mystical ambient by piano. Ugliest can't say it would be... there's lot of people who have made Ugliest music ever and they get even paid for it
MrKepponen 3 weeks ago 3
There is a pattern - the algorithm used to create it.
luminaeus 3 weeks ago
wow that sounded awful 0.0
MUSICimmortalmelody 3 weeks ago
Sounds more like horror music.
sth128 3 weeks ago
The sound of reality. Ups, downs, twists and turns and nothing ever repeats itself exactly.
1800MinhDinh 3 weeks ago
That has got to be the hardest thing to play.
johnnyrock30 3 weeks ago
@4:44 27x3=81 AND 27x3=243. WRONG. 27x3= 243. Get it right!
johnnyrock30 3 weeks ago
This is just Webern without the form...
BWAPP 3 weeks ago
I think I'm gonna stick with the Tau song...
MrLiguinii 3 weeks ago
Wait 'til he uses this technique to generate dubstep...
HordrissTheConfuser 3 weeks ago
i quite like it, I'd like to hear more
robertwillmer 3 weeks ago
I would not call this the world's ugliest music. I would call it the world's "most lacking in beauty" music. Really ugly music, I would think, would have a whole different set of (ugly) patterns of it's own.
Stonefern 3 weeks ago
I enjoyed the weirdness of it. Am I the only one?
gencshehu 3 weeks ago
@gencshehu No, I liked it too
robertwillmer 3 weeks ago
not bad. kinda liked it.
tubesss77 3 weeks ago
I actually really enjoyed this. I mean, really, how often do you hear pattern free music? Exactly.
Proggish 4 weeks ago 3
I've heard worse... so called avant-garde music
HatingFan 4 weeks ago 2
@HatingFan this is supposed to sound worse, theoretically
BabyEater9000 3 weeks ago
This guy obviously never heard Nickelback.
bonesmagoo 4 weeks ago 56
I think ive heard a NIN track that started that way.
Acroanidd 4 weeks ago
This is what grant money can do for ya.
ldavidp 1 month ago
inb4 dubstep remix
dance1211rec 1 month ago
Really reminds me of Morton Feldman!
lebunga 1 month ago
How would you know if he played a wrong note?
camroach87 1 month ago
That's impressive that the pianist could play the piece. But then again, if he made any mistakes who would notice?
mdoerkse 1 month ago 5
Someone get the cat off the piano.
3rdAutisticCuckoo 1 month ago
What a horror!
thrillscience 1 month ago
"the fibonacci song": song with a melody made with the fibonacci sequence.
check on youtube
inshiva 1 month ago
metal is based off of classical music, it used a classical scale... FAIL
ahlmx6 1 month ago
@ahlmx6 That may be true, but the vibrations are completely different; and it's the vibrations that determine the structure of molecules that come into contact with them. String theory supports this.
Eowyn47 1 month ago
@Eowyn47 also true, maybe metal also has positive effects. i enjoy metal and classical. i honestly dont thing this theory has enough proof neways
ahlmx6 1 month ago
@ahlmx6 Sure, metal has positive effects, it all depends on the individual song. All I know is that Emoto used a song that had vulgar lyrics and seeing water's reaction to just negative words and nothing else, the words probably did more damage than the music because words have a vibration too.
Eowyn47 1 month ago
@Eowyn47 umm seriously? you think molecules knew they were "bad" words. you could say fudge, instead of fuck, with more bass and deeper vibrations. the shit prolly was caused because metal has double bass and deep vocals, if you took classical music and changed the notes to deeper notes it'd do the same thing. this study is completely invalid.
ahlmx6 1 month ago
@ahlmx6 Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying, because repeatedly, time after time, positive words yielded strong hexagonal structures in the molecules, whereas negative words yielded no structure at all. The whole point of the study was to show that words, thoughts, and emotions affect us because they affect molecules, and we are made of molecules, including 70% water. This idea is not really that radical. If you do the research yourself, you will find similar findings worldwide.
Eowyn47 1 month ago
@ahlmx6 Also, deeper vibrations do not necessarily make the molecular structure weaker, just like higher frequencies do not necessarily make the molecular structure stronger. It's much more complicated than that. Google the 528Hz frequency and you will get more information about this phenomenon. It's an example of a 'healing' frequency because doctors actually use this frequency to repair DNA. I expect water would react positively to that frequency, for example.
Eowyn47 1 month ago
I wonder how water molecules would react to this music. Anyone who's familiar with Masaru Emoto's water experiments knows what I'm talking about. Basically, the molecules had a stronger structure when classical music was played for it, and a weak structure when heavy metal was played. Both kinds of music have a pattern though, so I wonder how water molecules would react to something with no pattern. Would it be neutral, or have a weak structure like the heavy metal? Someone should try this.
Eowyn47 1 month ago
@Eowyn47 His experiments were nowhere near scientific and have never been reproduced. What is a "stronger structure" and a "weak structure"? Besides, the appeal of a particular pattern of an ice crystal is quite a subjective matter. No one should waste time trying this.
batsali99 1 month ago
@batsali99 If you are familiar with his experiments, you should already know what constitutes a strong structure and a weak one. The strength of the structure is what is objective about his experiments. A strong structure is one that has a stable, hexagonal structure (like a complete snowflake). A weak structure is one that is disjointed or abnormal. You can easily tell the difference. And there are many other scientific experiments that support Emoto's results, ones not done by him.
Eowyn47 1 month ago
@Eowyn47 Describe to me in detail the mechanism by which a bunch of water molecules, inanimate matter, can appreciate complex musical structure, understand any human language and choose to respond to what is said. From what I read, you have a mediocre grasp of science and common sense, at best! Try to explain how this bogus scientific experiment makes sense in your magical world. Thanks.
batsali99 1 month ago
@batsali99 Scientists used to think that molecules were inanimate matter, but quantum physics has changed this. Matter is not dumb, matter is intelligent energy and that energy is constantly changing. If you are genuinely interested in the science behind it, I recommend you do some quantum physics research and read Dr. Emoto's book, 'The Hidden Messages in Water', which will give you more thorough answers than I can give in a YouTube comment with a character limit. Good luck!
Eowyn47 4 weeks ago
That's definitely not the ugliest music, but I guess it's all a matter of one's opinion. My opinion is that I simply appreciate the fact that the music doesn't have a pattern or structure, although at some places, it kind of felt like it DID have a structure. I don't find it ugly or beautiful. It kind of just IS.
Eowyn47 1 month ago
that is definitely not the world's ugliest music. even just on piano you could easily do worse.
remonsim 1 month ago
4:35 27x3 is not 243, dammit...
kevin4peace 1 month ago
He hit a wrong note at 9:07
Zhyppers 1 month ago
@Zhyppers Lol guess we'll never know!
peto0101 1 month ago
At least its not Friday
mookie9439 1 month ago
I'm 17 and what is this.
eetherealflux 1 month ago
I've heard worse pieces of music, so to call it ugly is way overdone...
bpewien 1 month ago
OMG, I actually enjoyed the music. Full of surprises.
apogy02 1 month ago
i'd still rather listen to this than anything by ke$herp >_>
Dizzysadako 1 month ago 2
Still not as ugly as Crazy Bus.
BloobFace 1 month ago 3
@BloobFace
crazy bus, crazyy bus, riidding on the crazy buss
samsonmathew7000 1 month ago
I can play this song too! *Smashing.my.fingers.randomly.around.on.the.keyboard*
Damnit, I can't even play it that bad as that guy ^^
AndiParkour 1 month ago
just out of curiosity... how is this different if you used Pi (3.14...)to determine the notes and Phi (the golden section 1.61...) as the timing? im pretty sure that pi and phi will go one with out making any patterns.
wakojako49 1 month ago in playlist Best of TEDxTalks
@wakojako49 I think that is because Pi has reptition in it's number. For example the number '1' occurs twice in the first four digits. He seems to be interested in repetition free score, not just pattern-less
ChrisCummins 1 month ago in playlist Best of TEDxTalks
@ChrisCummins mmm.... that's interesting. yeah i guess you're right. anyways its some thought i just thought about cause you know pi and phi are called irrational numbers because there is no repetition of patterns. :P
wakojako49 1 month ago
27x3=243? At 5:15 on the presentation :)
mmbosschaert 1 month ago 16
@mmbosschaert It's just a typo that should read 81 x 3 = 243
TruDelusi0N 1 month ago
@mmbosschaert Lol its a pattern but they got it wrogn its
1 1*3 3 3*3 9 9*3 27 27*3 81 81*3 243
TheNecromancer077 1 month ago
@mmbosschaert nice catch! It should have been 81 x 3 = 243
sumitsijher 1 month ago
Comment removed
flirryvorru 1 month ago
@mmbosschaert it was a typo he meant 81
bumblebumz 3 weeks ago in playlist Best of TEDxTalks
@mmbosschaert Well if you follow the pattern, it looks like it was meant to be 81x3 which does come out to 243.
Cerhob 3 weeks ago
So Venetian Snares walked into a bar and
Cheerepownin 1 month ago 20
I played that when i was a kid!
smwilson31 1 month ago 4
Comment removed
AfroDeezeeYak 1 month ago
Sounds like King Crimson.
UNOisMAD 1 month ago
better than nickelback
xalener 1 month ago
the intro is kinda cool LOL
josecalderari 1 month ago
@josecalderari thats the thing, we expect that first bass to be repeated then when its not it sounds awfull lol
sofuckyouyeah 1 month ago
i thougt the worlds ugliest music was metal
pakau 1 month ago
fukk this bad... but still better then justin bieber
pakau 1 month ago 2
Wow. The pianist made a huge mistake at 8:31
benedelstein93 2 months ago 2
@benedelstein93 i noticed it too, yeah, the pianist sux :(
Grafkores 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Plase nigger. Google hip hop, if you wanna hear ugly music.
wii2050 2 months ago
とても美しいと思うんですが。。。。
aimoriizumi 2 months ago
I do have to agree that they have failed to make world's ugliest music. There's much worse crap on radio, MTV, and whatnot every day.
mixutin 2 months ago
No wonder sharks and orcas are so violent- who could listen to that underwater all day long???
mandopiano 2 months ago 3
Haha Rebecca Black's friday is on related videos :D
x264 2 months ago
How is this ugly?
TheJellyPope 3 months ago
@TheJellyPope "How is this ugly?" It sounds like jazz.
Ieatutube 2 months ago
Looks like a cat walking in the piano keys
TheShadowflarer 3 months ago 2
@TheShadowflarer A man playing a piano looks like a cat?
AfroDeezeeYak 3 months ago
@AfroDeezeeYak ¬¬, You can only be kidding me, I mean you've never seen a cat walking across the keys of a piano? Playing random notes?
TheShadowflarer 3 months ago
@TheShadowflarer I have....I still fail to make the VISUAL connection between a cat and a man, however. 0_0
AfroDeezeeYak 3 months ago
@AfroDeezeeYak Is because this guy, its looks like he is a noob in a piano so he play random note, like a cat walking in the piano keys...
TheShadowflarer 3 months ago
@TheShadowflarer A 'noob' physically located inside a piano looks like a cat walking across piano keys?
Interesting.
AfroDeezeeYak 3 months ago
@AfroDeezeeYak Ok, you are impossible, i tried so hard to make you understand but you never go understand OMFG !!
TheShadowflarer 3 months ago
@TheShadowflarer You guys are hilarious
didkei 3 weeks ago
@AfroDeezeeYak eyes, nose, and mouth are in the same basic position. Plus one has an anatomical equivalent of everything the other has, and vice versa.
xalener 1 month ago
the ugliest? It's a great soundtrack for some triller movie!
daedrakul 3 months ago 2
beautiful music!
tom1263tom 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This research is very interesting, but there is a mistake in facts: Schoenberg tried to create music without repeats in _1910s_ [so called atonal music, i.e. op.16]. Then he discovered Dodecaphony (1920s, since op.25) and used repeats everywhere.
aismoll 3 months ago
Comment removed
aismoll 3 months ago
complete bulshit! try make money otherwise.....
AramHovhannisyan 3 months ago
It isn't patternless.
Piglet0123456789 3 months ago 2
@Piglet0123456789 I agree. My thought was that there were elements of style producing a pattern. While the specific key press may be random, by translating the calculation to the piano utter randomness is lost.
Ieatutube 2 months ago
slightly anticlimactic.
Jonpoo1 3 months ago
they should use a music software to play this in a sped up version
billyboy8888 3 months ago
@billyboy8888 watch?v=h0tpq395-yA
Hsiss 3 months ago
WTF it sounds like somebody who has never played a piano. There was probably no need for the piano player.
Jesustheincestpedo 3 months ago
The piano player looked so frustrated with every note he hit....lol
tony2xxx 3 months ago
that is actually some really good 'ambient', I'd say...
constbrus 3 months ago 2
look alike nirvana
Vencermos 3 months ago
7:50 for the music
GustavoCamposBragato 3 months ago 20
fail
goluanty 3 months ago
oooouuuuuhhhhh shhhhhhhit ))
AndrVasilev 3 months ago
lmaooooooooooo
swantonist 3 months ago
81*3=243
=)
LenaMashkina 3 months ago
7:45 Song "The Perfect Ping"
Scott Pickard co-founded a free educational science website for elementary age children called "ScienceWithMe" d.o.t. com
GreatG0dOm 3 months ago
Show! very good for "creative meditation"...please, don't let me feel alone...I feel like I'm different, as I loved that piece...not bad, really good excerpt!
The only bad thig is the idiot presenter... that's a piece of shit.
namesmaster 3 months ago
It's still better than Justin Bieber!
nelcimpilot 3 months ago
i love the ending.
Me2Myself3AndI 3 months ago
it's funny how Linkin Park is in the 'related videos' list
rohanwesz 3 months ago 54
WHAT THE FUCK?!
AbzeRd 3 months ago
How can this music is ugly? I'm not seeing it, I'm hearing it.
diogoavn 3 months ago 2
ЗАНУДСТВО, НЕ ВИЖУ НИЧЕГО ПРОТИВНОГО!!!!!!!
Alalalal712 3 months ago
мда
Alalalal712 3 months ago
only shit
fetirosm 3 months ago
Strange how YouTube recommended me 30 Seconds to Mars after watching the video of the worst music ever.
vsblight 3 months ago
Still better than Bieber.
vsblight 3 months ago
7:47 - Free skip bullshit button (for god sake, why no one did it before ?? >:| I have to watch a lot of bs)
ricardofiorani 3 months ago 3
needs a techno remix
angryDAnerd 3 months ago
Much better than Bieber.
Escapistua 3 months ago
I don't hear "ugliness" I hear "troubled-ness." As if this were the theme song for someone who bad things are always happening to.
Jsqaured 3 months ago
Comment removed
Jsqaured 3 months ago
Comment removed
Jsqaured 3 months ago
бред старого ....
ulkiora1989 3 months ago
There's no Music without a Harmony.
This "melody" could be music if has some phrases or motifs...
So...Great discovery.
huoppp 3 months ago
I think this is the music Vogons play.
hixjustin21 3 months ago
I'm amazed, people actually clapped at the end.
WhatsUpDubai 3 months ago
There is a repeated high and low tone?
ranniskurast 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Way better than Justin Bieber.
kikin12v1 3 months ago
People should stop skipping the lecture.
roxbagarai 3 months ago
o cara ta tocando ate com vergonha kkkkk
ezequielquintino 3 months ago
Comment removed
ezequielquintino 3 months ago
i want to hear this sped up
vans4menu 3 months ago
Quem concorda que é melhor que Restart e Justin Biba da um joinha plz !
CleisonBlackmore1 3 months ago
better than Justin Bieber
DiidoMega 3 months ago
putz! da proxima vez tenta com o albabeto, pq pela a matematica... ti dou nota o,1
diegogomes22k 3 months ago
Faltou so a harmonia , a melodia e otima kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
gabrieltele100 3 months ago
Essa peça foi exibida para deficientes auditivos. O cara levantou pra dizer que tinha acabado :0
Guilherme4887 3 months ago
melhor do que qualquer funk
rriivvaass 3 months ago 2