As can be assessed by the regions of protein bonds or by the arbitrary divine hand, the 'what-is' is still subjected to secrecy. The 'is' is one and the same with pure Nothing since not a classifiable genus or modifier can be used to name the is epistemologically which in itself is biased and flawed To be 'kissed in shadow' is to be blessed with the understanding of Nothing the fruitfulness of God's essence This song is the sonic replication of such an encounter the representation of non-being
@jessicafaye5353 Don't know what I was on. I was definitely too full of myself to develop a coherent chain of reasoning. I'm back to earth now, alive and well. From the looks of it, I was trying to fuse the little I knew of Heidegger at the time with some kind of hippie mysticism. But you're right, I don't know what the hell I was on at the time.
God is pure Nothing, God is not a thing or an attempt to be a thing [daimon] as God is born by the lovers of the secret. The 'nothingness' of which to be 'kissed in shadow' is understood by God as pure detachment as an unmistakable nearness from the Ground of Being as it is it's abyss Detachment is the abstinence from all that is worldly not from a voluntary piousness or a suffering account of worship, but from an already present necessity. The 'what-is' was not created, it appeared without why.
As can be assessed by the regions of protein bonds or by the arbitrary divine hand, the 'what-is' is still subjected to secrecy. The 'is' is one and the same with pure Nothing since not a classifiable genus or modifier can be used to name the is epistemologically which in itself is biased and flawed To be 'kissed in shadow' is to be blessed with the understanding of Nothing the fruitfulness of God's essence This song is the sonic replication of such an encounter the representation of non-being
pastpresentdilla 2 years ago
@pastpresentdilla Come back down to earth. I can't understand what you're saying. It sounds interesting, i'll give you that.
jessicafaye5353 2 months ago
@jessicafaye5353 Don't know what I was on. I was definitely too full of myself to develop a coherent chain of reasoning. I'm back to earth now, alive and well. From the looks of it, I was trying to fuse the little I knew of Heidegger at the time with some kind of hippie mysticism. But you're right, I don't know what the hell I was on at the time.
pastpresentdilla 2 months ago
God is pure Nothing, God is not a thing or an attempt to be a thing [daimon] as God is born by the lovers of the secret. The 'nothingness' of which to be 'kissed in shadow' is understood by God as pure detachment as an unmistakable nearness from the Ground of Being as it is it's abyss Detachment is the abstinence from all that is worldly not from a voluntary piousness or a suffering account of worship, but from an already present necessity. The 'what-is' was not created, it appeared without why.
pastpresentdilla 2 years ago
Such a beautiful beat!
Goodguuuy 3 years ago 7
Yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.............
Teghead 3 years ago 4