Markan Priority featuring Pastor Eman Laerton

[gekksvide0]

renassault:

There are assumptions on all sides. That Matthew and Luke wanted to copy everything as found in Mark rather than *using* Mark for rearrangement of their Gospels (Pluralism) isn't to be windowed. They didn't have to include everything they read in Mark. Must analyze all suggestions by scholars. Mark Goodacre has done a good analysis against the hypnotized "Q" source (See Mark Goodacre, the Case against Q, which I haven't started to read yet but followed up Goodacre's Blog about it)

[renassault]

Markan priority does not explain many features, which ur-Mark more than adequately does. For example, a whole parable is missing from both Matthew and Luke, also the number of sentences that are actually ad verbatim are too few for Matthew and Luke to have copied canonical Mark

[0wastedyouth0]

lol mr potato head

[anexperimat]

inexplicably indirect!

[lehman]

jacuzzi style

[anexperimat]

ey man, I ain't sayin the dude doesn't have stowl, just that I don't get it :P