Added: 2 years ago
From: Scoforever
Views: 1,118
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • All you objectivists need to stop criticizing this lady. She's your friend. At least she's acknowledging Rand's good traits. Most scholars realize that Rand was an extreme-capitalist, a dishonest philosopher, and a writer of absolutes.

    Not to mention she hated collectivism, yet used medicare.

  • @redshark618 "Us" Objectivists also realize that she was an extreme capitalist and a writer of absolutes. What you find dishonest in her philosophy, I don't know.

    As for medicare, she, like many US citizens do, (over)paid for it so she might as well have used it.

  • @ReasonSharp Alright, here is a condensed list of Objectivism's problems:

    -dogma, the reliance on "axioms" (moral absolutes) instead of realistic worldviews

    -xenophobia, an automatic conceit or ill-will against those perceived "incompetent"

    -hostility toward any differing opinion (this is the hallmark of dictatorship)

    -extreme egocentricity

    -the valuation of "what" to think, rather than "how" to think

    Overall, objectivism resembles a tyranny more than a philosophy. I've been there before.

  • @redshark618 Oh, please. Is this the highest extent of your "knowledge" of Objectivism?

    Actually, I don't care how you justify that BS, I've heard all of these before and I'm not interested to enter yet another pointless discussion.

  • @ReasonSharp Hostility toward differing opinions. You've proved my point for me.

  • @redshark618 You see what you want to see and not what is. This is concerning both my attitude and Ayn Rand. You're not saying anything new, just repeating what other opponents of Ayn Rand are mindlessly jabbering. It's no wonder that you see any criticism to that as hostility when in reality I just don't care. These points have been thoroughly analyzed and argued against rationally (not to mention, some are blatant lies, at least to someone who has read some of her books).

  • @ReasonSharp I have read her books. I used to believe them.  I hope for now we can agree to disagree. Good day.

  • Jennifer basically says "I decided which of Ayn Rand's traits were her character flaws, and then I felt sorry for her that she didn't overcome them."

    Dishonesty at its best.

  • @ReasonSharp How is that dishonesty? Writers do that all the time. Tolstoy disagreed with Dostoyevsky but still admired his heart.

  • @redshark618 Well, suppose that you lied to a murderer to protect your children and afterwards I said that you were a liar because of it and that I was sorry that you hadn't overcome that flaw.

    Does that sound like I'd be a very honest person in that scenario?

  • I've read the book and I thoroughly enjoyed it. It was a good account of how Ayn Rand developed her thought and her novels. Her life is laid out in a narrative, and like Burns says, you can't help to both admire and yet sometimes wish Rand was a bit different.

    Rand's personal relationships were not very great and she did not have much tact. I think her biggest flaw was that she did not exactly have very good social skills. She had her flaws like every human being after all; she was not a God.

  • am Crap.

    Did she even read Rand's books?

  • Jennifer Burns does not understand Objectivism.

  • If conservatives had listened to Ayn Rand back in the day the Republican party wouldn't be the bunch of douches they are today.

  • Interesting perspective, take on Rand/Objectivism.

    Like all dogmas and belief systems - Christianity, Communism, AA, Amway - Objectivism would work great if everyone bought into it and no new information was allowed into the system to corrupt the believers, shake loose the Unmoved Mover all rationalistic philosophies share.

  • @HickysBoy genuine question- what has the information that has made objectivism redundant?

  • @samm1809 sorry, what IS the information that has made atlas shrugged redundant

  • I wish she'd have elaborated on those "weaknesses and flaws" that she claims Rand had. She claims Rand needed "balance" which leads me to suspect that she came away with an extremely poor understanding of objectivism, or just disagreed with it. We can't know which. I was actually considering buying Burns' book based on the first 90% of the interview, but I really hate when people make accusations without backing them up. That leads me to conclude that she would be a horrible biographer of Rand.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more